...Crisis need not strike a company purely as a result of its own negligence or misadventure. Often, a situation is created which cannot be blamed on the company - but the company finds out pretty quickly that it takes a huge amount of blame if it fumbles the ball in its response. One of the classic tales of how a company can get it right is that of Johnson & Johnson, and the company's response to the Tylenol poisoning. What happened In 1982, Johnson & Johnson's Tylenol medication commanded 35 per cent of the US over-the-counter analgesic market - representing something like 15 per cent of the company's profits. Unfortunately, at that point one individual succeeded in lacing the drug with cyanide. Seven people died as a result, and a widespread panic ensued about how widespread the contamination might be. By the end of the episode, everyone knew that Tylenol was associated with the scare. The company's market value fell by $1bn as a result. When the same situation happened in 1986, the company had learned its lessons well. It acted quickly - ordering that Tylenol should be recalled from every outlet - not just those in the state where it had been tampered with. Not only that, but the company decided the product would not be re-established on the shelves until something had been done to provide better product protection. As a result, Johnson & Johnson developed the tamperproof packaging that would make it much more difficult for a similar incident to occur in future...
Words: 537 - Pages: 3
...Running Head: TYLENOL MURDERS Johnson & Johnson: The Tylenol Crisis of 1982 Since 1887 Johnson and Johnson had been a respected member of the health care industry providing millions of customers with a diverse line of products from surgical dressings and band aids to baby powder. It had built its reputation on providing surgeons with sterile dressing to use after surgery because infection was a major cause of death after surgical procedures. The company was also a pioneer in the corporate idea of decentralizing the structure of their business so each set of products were directed by their own subsidiary and each had autonomy from the main corporate center. A family run, publicly traded business, the company had always had been aware of its responsibility towards the public and its employees as well as its shareholders. In 1959 Johnson and Johnson acquired McNeil laboratories, maker of the prescription-only drug Tylenol. By 1980, Tylenol was responsible for 37 percent of the pain reliever market and was responsible for 33 percent of the company’s profit growth (Tifft, Griggs, 1982). That type of share of the market illustrates the presence Tylenol had in the industry and there was no end in sight. On the morning of September 29th Mary Kellerman was seen by her parents as having flu symptoms so they gave her Extra Strength Tylenol to combat her fever. She became sick within hours and died later that day. On...
Words: 2003 - Pages: 9
...and to use its various tools to manage a crisis” (University of Phoenix, 2010). A company must be able to communicate well with the outside environment to conduct public relations successfully. This is particularly true concerning crisis management. A real life example is the crisis management strategies undertaken by Johnson and Johnson during the Tylenol crisis in 1982. By managing relations well with the public, the company could diffuse a crisis situation that put the very existence of the company in question (cited in Devlin, 2004). The case study of the Tylenol crisis serves to illustrate the importance of well-managed communications strategies when it comes to concerning managing public relations in a crisis situation. When the catastrophe broke out, Tylenol was the profuse merchandise of Johnson & Johnson. Leading the painkiller market, it was contributing 33% of the year-to-year profit growth of the company (cited in Watson, 2006). During fall 1982, some unknown parties removed a number of Tylenol packages from store-shelves in the Chicago area, opened those packages, removed the tablets, replaced them with cyanide contaminated tablets and replace those packages on the shelves without any apparent signs of tampering. As a result of the cyanide in the capsules, seven people died horribly and overnight, the most trusted product in the industry became the most feared product in the industry (cited in Swit, 1982). The Tylenol crisis was the result of an act of...
Words: 1764 - Pages: 8
...Ethics: Tylenol Recall Case of 1982 Developing high-quality business ethics is a crucial step in avoiding, resolving and preventing ethical problems. If companies focus on exceeding the standard expectations for ethical situations, they will be more likely to hold on to their current customers and might even attract new clientele. The Chicago Tylenol Recall is the perfect example of how the corrective actions a company takes may be able to save the reputation and restore the image it has worked hard to create. Johnson & Johnson was faced with a situation that was not necessarily theirs to blame. Someone, that was not associated with the company, had been tampering with the over-the-counter medicine. However, Tylenol took certain measures to illustrate to their consumers they were a trustworthy company that cares about their customers’ safety. The methods Johnson & Johnson used to handle the crisis had both positives and negatives, but overall, the company was able to regain the company’s image and become one of the most popular medications. 1. History and Background of Case In 1982, Chicago was hit by a string of deaths caused by tainted cyanide-filled capsules of Tylenol. Someone had been filling Extra-Strength Tylenol capsules with cyanide and returning them to drug-store shelves (Tift and Griggs). By October of 1982, seven people had been killed by the poison-laced capsules (Meadows). This caused a wave of panic in the city, state, and country as it involved...
Words: 1350 - Pages: 6
...| Topic-; Identify any crisis, which occurred recently in industry/organization critically analyze the ways by which it was resolved. What is management crisis?Crises can strike any company at any time. Microsoft, ValuJet, Chrysler, Pepsi and the tobacco industry are some of the most recent companies that can attest to this fact, but they are not the only ones. Crises do not discriminate based on a company’s size or notoriety, and they can hit when a company least expects them. They come in many forms – strikes, layoffs, product recalls or allegations of misconduct, but while some of these may seem small, every crisis has the potential to damage the reputation of a company. Regardless of the severity of the situation, crises pose a serious threat to companies – not only to their reputation but their fiscal health as well. When Odwalla’s apple juice was thought to be the cause of an outbreak of E. coli bacteria, the company lost a third of its market value. The same allegation against Jack in the Box restaurant in 1993 caused the hamburger chain’s stock price to fall from $14 a share to nearly $3 a share. On the other hand, some companies emerge from crises unscathed in the eyes of consumers and investors. Johnson and Johnson is one such company. After it was discovered that its Tylenol capsules had been laced with cyanide, Johnson and Johnson reacted in such an effective way that the case is now well-documented as an example of successful crisis management. The factor...
Words: 2345 - Pages: 10
...Module 4, “part three of the public of the four-step public relations process is the action phase. It is during this stage of the process that the organization implements its strategic plan by doing and saying things to change attitudes, perceptions or even behavior on the part of its targeted publics”. The public relations decisions made as a result of the Tylenol crisis arrived in two phases. The first phase was the actual handling of the crisis. The comeback of both Johnson & Johnson and Tylenol was the second phase in the public relations plan. The planning for phase two began almost as soon as phase one was being implemented. The sabotage of the Tylenol capsules spurred an extreme panic about the safety of over-the-counter medications. In fact, the Tylenol crisis was so prominent that a survey at the time shows more Americans were aware of the tragedy than could identify the president of the United States (Murray & Shohen, 1992). It even threatened the very survival of Johnson & Johnson as a company because at the time, Tylenol products made up a very large portion of their revenue. Johnson & Johnson chairman and CEO, James Burke, reacted to the negative media coverage by forming a seven-member strategy team. The team's strategy guidance from Burke was first, "How do we protect the people?" and second "How do we save this product?" The company's first actions were to immediately alerted consumers across the nation, via the media, not to consume any type of Tylenol...
Words: 1635 - Pages: 7
...Information/Additional Perspective Johnson & Johnson Tylenol Case In 1982, Johnson & Johnson's Tylenol medication commanded 35 per cent of the US over-the-counter analgesic market - representing something like 15 per cent of the company's profits. Unfortunately, at that point one individual succeeded in lacing the drug with cyanide. Seven people died as a result, and a widespread panic ensued about how widespread the contamination might be. By the end of the episode, everyone knew that Tylenol was associated with the scare. The company's market value fell by $1bn as a result. When the same situation happened in 1986, the company had learned its lessons well. It acted quickly - ordering that Tylenol should be recalled from every outlet - not just those in the state where it had been tampered with. Not only that, but the company decided the product would not be re-established on the shelves until something had been done to provide better product protection.As a result, Johnson & Johnson developed the tamperproof packaging that would make it much more difficult for a similar incident to occur in future. How Did Johnson & Johnson Make These Decisions? The public relations decisions made in light of the Tylenol crisis had to have come from somewhere. This basis for decision making became a bit more clear in 1983, when the New Jersey Bell Journal published article written by Lawrence G. Foster. Foster, Corporate Vice President of Johnson & Johnson, at the time of the Tylenol...
Words: 836 - Pages: 4
...Assignment 1 Advanced Marketing | [The Johnson & Johnson Tylenol case study] | | Before the crisis, Tylenol was the most successful over-the-counter product in the United States with over one hundred million users. Tylenol was responsible for 19 percent of Johnson & Johnson's corporate profits during the first 3 quarters of 1982. Tylenol accounted for 13 percent of Johnson & Johnson's year-to-year sales growth and 33 percent of the company's year-to-year profit growth. Tylenol was the absolute leader in the painkiller field accounting for a 37 percent market share, outselling the next four leading painkillers combined, including Anacin, Bayer, Bufferin, and Excedrin. During the fall of 1982, for reasons not known, a malevolent person or persons, presumably unknown, replaced Tylenol Extra-Strength capsules with cyanide-laced capsules, resealed the packages, and deposited them on the shelves of at least a half-dozen or so pharmacies, and food stores in the Chicago area. The poison capsules were purchased, and seven unsuspecting people died a horrible death. Johnson & Johnson, parent company of McNeil Consumer Products Company which makes Tylenol, suddenly, and with no warning, had to explain to the world why its trusted product was suddenly killing people. Robert Andrews, assistant director for public relations at Johnson & Johnson recalls how the company reacted in the first days of the crisis: "We got a call from a Chicago news reporter....
Words: 673 - Pages: 3
...Tylenol Ethics Paper MGT/498 Tylenol Ethics Paper Johnson & Johnson companies reside in over 57 countries all across the world. This company consists of 250 sister companies. “Our Family of Companies is organized into several business segments comprised of franchises and therapeutic categories (Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., 2013)”. Johnson & Johnson is broke up into three main segments which include healthcare consumer, pharmaceuticals, and medical device and diagnostics. During 1982 Johnson & Johnson accidently “replaced Tylenol Extra-Strength capsules with cyanide-laced capsules, resealed the packages, and deposited them on the shelves of at least a half-dozen or so pharmacies and food stores in the Chicago area. The poison capsules were purchased, and seven unsuspecting people died a horrible death. Johnson & Johnson, parent company of McNeil Consumer Products Company which makes Tylenol, suddenly, and with no warning, had to explain to the world why its trusted product was suddenly killing people (Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., 2013)”. Johnson & Johnson was informed of this mistake by a Chicago news reporter. The news reporter told Johnson & Johnson that the medical examiner in Chicago “had just given a press conference people were dying from poisoned Tylenol (Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., 2013)”. Johnson & Johnson remedially formed a seven-member strategy team to figure out how they...
Words: 671 - Pages: 3
...Tylenol crisis of 1982 John Doe Business Society September 30, 2015 Tylenol crisis of 1982 John Doe Business Society September 30, 2015 Abstract In this paper I talked about the Johnson and Johnson Tylenol case of 1832. I explained the case and defended Johnson and Johnson’s ethical decision. I learned that this case paved the way for companies to start recalling their products if there is something wrong with them. Tylenol crisis of 1982 Johnson and Johnson’s Tylenol product had become one of the most successful over the counter product in the United States. Then mysterious deaths all around the US were being linked to Tylenol. Johnson and Johnson was faced with the ethical decision whether or not they should have a recall on their product or not. Many companies have been put in the ethical decision of right and wrong before. Johnson and Johnson decided that the best decision they could make was to recall their product from the market. Even though this decision may have set Johnson and Johnson back in the short term, eventually they were able to come back even stronger in the long term. Johnson and Johnson’s Tylenol was cashing in 19 percent of its profits. Tylenol was becoming one of the most successful products ever. The fall of 1982 comes around and there are reports of deaths that doctors are relating to Tylenol. Many Tylenol bottles were reported tampered with. Somebody had replaced the pills in a Tylenol bottle with cyanide-laced capsules. These pills...
Words: 1084 - Pages: 5
...of little Mary Kellerman of Illinois just a few days before similar cases began to spread over neighboring cities. Mary’s parents soon learned what happened to their little girl, after two off-duty firefighters alerted health officials of the connection of the sudden deaths and Tylenol (Weiss, 2006). In this paper, the author will discuss the affect “The Tylenol Crisis had on Johnson & Johnson and the company’s stakeholders using the six-step ethics issue resolution process. Defining the Issue In the fall of 1982, McNeil Consumer Products, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, faced a crisis that claimed the lives of seven individuals in Chicago, Illinois. After two local firefighters who were home listening to his or her police radio, discovered that the information retrieved from each incident involved the consumption of Tylenol. After testing, the remaining Extra Strength Tylenol capsules retrieved contained 65 milligrams of cyanide poisoning. This was considered 10,000 times more than what was needed to kill someone. After the connection was made between the seven deaths and Extra Strength Tylenol, Johnson & Johnson had to find an avenue to make public this awful finding. However,...
Words: 1298 - Pages: 6
...Running header: Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson: The Tylenol Crisis Renita Edwards Virginia College MGT3410 Mike Aday 3/20/2008 Outline I) Brief history of Tylenol crisis II) Recalling the product from points of view a) Economic point of view b) Legal point of view c) Moral point of view III) Benefit from the company’s credo and mission statements a) Johnson & Johnson b) Bristol- Myers Squibb c) Merck Corporation d) Bridgestone Tires IV) Conclusion Johnson & Johnson: The Tylenol Crisis Brief History During the fall of 1982, on September 30, Johnson & Johnson CEO James Burke received the horrible information that several deaths had occurred. The deaths of seven people were a result of them taking cyanide-laced capsules of Extra Strength Tylenol. This information captivated the nation’s attention. Before this happen Johnson& Johnson “had captured over 35 percent of the $ 1 billion analgesic market- over three times the market share of it’s nearest competitor.” (Boatright, 2007) Tylenol was actually dominating the analgesic market; this product was making a lot of money for Johnson & Johnson. The cyanide was placed into the capsules of the Extra Strength Tylenol, the capsules were easy to lace because they could be pulled apart and put back together again and no one not know it. James Burke and staff found out that “the tampering had...
Words: 1646 - Pages: 7
...study been communicated any more effectively. Identifying the different public relations communications tools and techniques that were used to infirm, influence, motivate the public; what other tools would have been used. Last if this were to happen today how would new improve technologies effect this case, mean while because of the recent globalization of market could the result of Tylenol Murders case turn out any different if it occurred today. Identify the different publics Johnson and Johnson have been in business for over one hundred years. This company is the maker of the brand name medication Tylenol and is known as a well managed business, but on the morning of September 30th the year 1982 Johnson & Johnson was face with a unforeseen public relation situations. The company learned that the extra-strength Tylenol had been used to murder three people. In passing days there was a report of three more people also dying from the extra-strength Tylenol. Before this occurred Johnson and Johnson was a growing million dollar company. When the murder of the six people occurred the high profile company was caught off guard, but right away they open up to the media to make the public aware of what happen in their company to prevent panicking. After finding of that some wrong information was released, the...
Words: 1057 - Pages: 5
...24, 1989, the tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground on the Bligh Reefs in Prince William Sound, Alaska spilling 10.8 million gallons or 20% of the ship’s cargo. It was the 34th largest oil in the world at the time and the largest in U.S.A. The oil spill killed 500,000 birds over 90 species more than 4000 sea otters, 14 killer whales and destroyed tourism and the fish industry of the area. It was said on reports that the probable reason on why the tanker has gone aground was because of the captain and its crew being drunk. The "Exxon Valdez" entered the language as a shortcut for corporate arrogance and damage because of its lack of action as soon as possible by the owners of the company when the oil spill happened. 2/9 Johnson & Johnson: Tylenol Tylenol an over-the-counter product in the U.S. with over hundred million users was the most successful in selling painkillers. Tylenol was the absolute leader in the painkiller field accounting for a 37 percent market share, outselling the next four leading painkillers combined, including Anacin, Bayer, Bufferin, and Excedrin. Unfortunately in 1982 a total of seven deaths occurred in Chicago resulting to a recall of all Tylenol bottles all over the U.S. which led to a drop in sales of $1.2B but has recovered because of its great strategies by using public relations and media as a tool to once again gain the trust of its consumers. 3/9 II. Situational Analysis Exxon Valdez I’ll be using the social,...
Words: 1300 - Pages: 6
...Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson is known around the world today as the most competitive and broadly based manufacturer of health care products. J & J also provides other services to the pharmaceutical and medical diagnostic markets. In 1887, three brothers, Robert Wood, Edward Mead, and James Wood Johnson set out to create Johnson & Johnson; which became one of the largest health care companies. The company started in Brunswick, New Jersey with only fourteen employees, today employs more than 110, 000 employees. J & J’s objective is to provide scientifically sound, high quality products and services to help, heal, cure disease and improve the quality of life. With their objective set high, J & J has social responsibility, sets guidelines for FrameworkS to help with creativity within the company, infuse ethics into its decision making, and strives to keep ahead of the competition in the fast paced market. The Johnson and Johnson (J & J) company has been motivated to accomplished its Credo which is its social responsibilities. J & J has been reaching out to support social and public health programs as well as medical educational initiatives around the world. Its Credo emphasizes the vision of Global responsibility toward communities in which they live in and work, its customers and global environment, employees, finally its stockholders. J & J’s community responsibility has been made by providing financial support, product donations and health care expertise through...
Words: 2632 - Pages: 11
