Free Essay

A Research Study to Determine If the Gop’s Argument to

In:

Submitted By npayne1
Words 1343
Pages 6
A Research Study to Determine if the GOP’s Argument to
Defund Planned Parenthood is Creditable

By

Nathaniel A. Payne

Submitted to the Faculty of
Brandman University
In partial fulfillment of the requirement for
HRCU 630 Conflict & Negotiation

03 April 2016 Introduction
The Grand Ole Parties’ (GOP) argument to defund Planned Parenthood is not creditable because of one particular reason; Planned Parenthood is not using government funds to conduct abortion. These are the term in which the legislation was written and passed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Planned Parenthood receives public funds to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services and ensure access to such services to provide educational programs which enhance understanding of individual and societal implications of human sexuality to promote research and the advancement of technology in reproductive health care and encourage understanding of their inherent bioethical, behavioral, and social implications (Planned Parenthood, 2014). Now the GOP wish to change legislation and deny Planned Parenthood public fund because now the Party wish to argue that no organization should receive public fund that conducts abortions for any program it does. All people have the right to make decisions for them-selves. To be able to make informed choices people need education and resources (Lottes, 2013). First and foremost this is not attracting the Republican Party nor is it a Demarcate verses Republican bipartisan debate. This is a study of the merits of an argument impose by one entity to another to deny future operational funding. 3 percent of Planned Parenthood services are abortions and yes, it is a larger share of Planned Parenthoods revenue only because abortion services are really expensive and to point out that these services are paid by the patient. Public funds given to Planned Parenthood and its partners are used to provide about 4 million tests and treatments related to sexually transmitted diseases, over 500 thousand breast exams, 3 million birth control services, and about 1 million pregnancy test each year. This does not include the educational class it provides to teens and young adults.
GOP’s Argument
During the hearings that the Republican members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee lunched against Planned Parenthood Republicans criticized Planned Parenthood saying that the organizations receives most of its revenue from public funds and that the tax payer is providing over 40 percent of Planned Parenthoods income.
The Rebuttal
The use of this argument to defund Planned Parenthood does not hold water. As the legislation or U.S. law is written, federal funds cannot be used for abortions unless the pregnancy threatens the life of the expecting mother or in the case of rape or incest. So if Planned Parenthood is getting 40 percent of income from taxpayers, this means it’s not coming from abortion but from other services they provide. Argument after argument Planned Parenthood has defended itself with the law being on their side.
Why doesn’t the Republican Party see that their arguments have no merit? It’s because the Republicans are negotiating theory and emotion. “The bigger the transaction, the more important it is to identify core interest, walkaway options, and assess how other parties see their choices (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, 2015). The problem is the Republicans have done none of this, they started a hail storm with conservative and made defunding Planned Parenthood a political issue and have no way of taking it off the table without making it a lose/win situation with Planned Parenthood being the victor. The worse of all this is “the ramifications of their political differences, the impacts of their public comments, and the innuendo of their private asides not only resonate with the messiest battles associated with divorce but also symbolize larger sociopolitical impacts on women, illustrating how women’s bodies can serve as material tools for various political groups” (Young & Wright, 2015).
My Argument
Here is an argument as to why Planned Parenthood should remain funded. It’s good for the economy. When people have access to family planning it creates a clime in income levels and family planning reduces poverty because families are not living above their means which reduces the amount of families on state assistance. “Medicaid and Title X provide critical reproductive health care and family planning services to low-income women and families throughout America. Medicaid is the largest single public funding source for family planning services” (Zoppo, 2012). Defunding this Planned Parenthood throws many American who can’t afford to go to a major hospital or private physician for basic health care services under the bus.
The members of the Republican Party that support defunding Planned Parenthood is underestimating the benefit of services this organization provides to the private and public.
The benefit to women that most GOP members fail to see or refuse to see is the positive impact of these reproductive health care centers provide. Due to being able to receive contraceptive service from a government funded clinic a high percentage of women were able to take better care of themselves and their family. Because women have a choice they were able to retain employment, seek higher positions or stay in school. Also because women have the capability to control family size the chance of living in poverty is much lower. No matter what side of the abortion argument a person is on, we must all agree that if you defund Planned Parenthood and low income women in this country are not able to receive contraceptive service there will be more unplanned pregnancies and more abortions. There is a consensus within the GOP that this conflict with Planned Parenthood needs to be resolve prior to the 2016 Presidential Election because it has begun to look like GOP verses women’s rights.
Strategies & Resolutions
There are a few strategies one might use to resolve a conflict like this such as Reconciling Interest. “Interest is needs, desires, concerns, fears. The things one cares about or want” (Lewicki, et al. 2015). Because the GOP does not want to lose face they can ask for concessions as more transparency of the organization and accounting of public funds to ensure funds are not being used toward abortion services. Another strategy to resolve this dispute is Determining Who Is Right: “to rely on some independent standard with perceived legitimacy or fairness to determine who is right” (Lewicki, et al. 2015). The two entities must look outside each organization and find a private research company that does not have ties to either organization.
This company will work as an arbitrator, study the facts and make logical and justifiable decisions based solely on the standing law written by both houses and operating statements obtained from Planned Parenthood. The decision is final and let the cards fall where they may.
Conclusion
As of now I see no side winning this argument because each side refuses to adopt a negotiation strategy. They refuse to accommodate because this would be a lose/win, compromise and split the different is off the table because there is too much to lose, avoiding the situation could work for Planned Parenthood but not the GOP because they have to answer to their conservative constituents that will continue fighting the good fight without collaborating with the enemy. The only strategy for either side at this juncture is to remain competitive; win at all cost.
References
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015) (7th Ed) Negotiation: Reading, Exercises, and Cases. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Lottes, I. L. (2013). Sexual Rights: Meanings, Controversies, and Sexual Health Promotion. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3/4), 367-391. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.764380
Planned Parenthood Mission Statement. (2014). https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/mission
Young, A. M., & Wright, J. L. (2015). The Anatomy of a Divorce: Women's Studies in Communication, 38(2), 146-150. doi:10.1080/07491409.2015.1034631
Zoppo, D. (2012). The War on Women: Federal Remedies to Fight Back Against States that De-fund Planned Parenthood: Vermont Law Review, 37(2), 495-525.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

A Research Study to Determine If the Gop’s Argument to

...A Research Study to Determine if the GOP’s Argument to Defund Planned Parenthood is Creditable By Nathaniel A. Payne Submitted to the Faculty of Brandman University In partial fulfillment of the requirement for HRCU 630 Conflict & Negotiation 03 April 2016 Introduction The Grand Ole Parties’ (GOP) argument to defund Planned Parenthood is not creditable because of one particular reason; Planned Parenthood is not using government funds to conduct abortion. These are the term in which the legislation was written and passed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Planned Parenthood receives public funds to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services and ensure access to such services to provide educational programs which enhance understanding of individual and societal implications of human sexuality to promote research and the advancement of technology in reproductive health care and encourage understanding of their inherent bioethical, behavioral, and social implications (Planned Parenthood, 2014). Now the GOP wish to change legislation and deny Planned Parenthood public fund because now the Party wish to argue that no organization should receive public fund that conducts abortions for any program it does. All people have the right to make decisions for them-selves. To be able to make informed choices people need education and resources (Lottes, 2013). First and foremost this is not attracting the Republican...

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Discourse Analysis and the Media

...connotations.............................................................................17 VI. Conclusion.......................................................................................................19 I. Introduction The same-sex marriage movement deals with what is arguably a leading social issue in the United States today. In 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) legally fixed the definition of marriage to be that which includes one man and one woman, including the provision that “states need not recognize a marriage from another state if it is between persons of the same sex” (www.domawatch.org). Grassroots organizations began to form on both sides of the debate concerning same-sex marriage reform. Most discourse research on the issue focuses on the ways in which the media and reform oppositionists (DOMA defenders) use language to display and perpetuate their social and political dominance over the pro-reform...

Words: 7680 - Pages: 31

Free Essay

Sarbanes

...Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Ivy Xiying Zhang* William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration Carol Simon Hall 4-312 University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14627 zhangxi@simon.rochester.edu February 2005 I am grateful for the guidance of my dissertation committee, Bill Schwert, Charles Wasley, Ross Watts, and especially Jerry Zimmerman (Chairman). I also appreciate comments from Jim Brickley, Philip Joos, Andy Leone, Jerry Warner, Joanna Wu, Yan Cao, Ling Lei, Laura Liu, Tao Kuang, and workshop participants at the University of Rochester. All errors are my own. * Abstract This paper investigates the economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act through a study of market reactions to legislative events related to the Act. I find that the cumulative abnormal return around all legislative events leading to the passage of the Act is significantly negative. The loss in total market value around the most significant rulemaking events amounts to $1.4 trillion. I then examine the private benefits and costs of major provisions of the Act by investigating the cross-sectional variation in market reactions to the rulemaking events. Regression results are consistent with the hypothesis that shareholders consider both the restriction of nonaudit services and the provisions to enhance corporate governance costly to business. The results also show that Section 404 of SOX, which mandates an internal control test, imposes significant costs on...

Words: 28191 - Pages: 113

Premium Essay

Hidden Persuader

...Vance Packard With an Introduction by Mark Crispin Miller PUBLISHING Brooklyn, New York Copyright © 1957, 1980 by Vance Packard Originally published by Pocket Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc. Introduction Copyright 2007© by Mark Crispin Miller All rights reserved. Printed in Canada Reissue Edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission of the publisher. Please direct inquiries to: Ig Publishing 178 Clinton Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11205 www.igpub.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Packard, Vance Oakley, 1914The hidden persuaders / Vance Packard ; [new] introduction by Mark Crispin Miller. p. cm. Originally published in 1957 by McKay and reissued in 1980 by Pocket Books with a new afterword. ISBN-13: 978-0-9788431-0-6 ISBN-10: 0-9788431-0-X 1. Advertising--Psychological aspects. 2. Consumers--Psychology. 3. Advertising, Political. 4. Propaganda. 5. Control (Psychology) I. Title. HF5822.P3 2007 659.101'9--dc22 2007027043 To Virginia CONTENTS Introduction by Mark Crispin Miller 1. The Depth Approach PERSUADING US AS CONSUMERS Z. The Trouble With People 3. So Ad Men become Depth Men 4. ....And The Hooks Are Lowered 5. Self-Images for Everybody 6. RX for Our Secret Distresses 1. Marketing Eight Hidden Needs 8. The Built-In Sexual Overtone 9. Back to the Breast, and Beyond 10. Babes In Consumerland 11. Class and Caste in the Salesroom 12. Selling Symbols...

Words: 85598 - Pages: 343

Premium Essay

Heath Care Policy Legislation Stage

...Chicago; International Trade and Transportation specialist, Hunton & Williams (Greg, “Why we should invest today in 'Airports Inc.'”. March. http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/labor/218525-faa-why-we-should-invest-today-in-airports-inc) With the latest Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) forecast predicting a doubling of passengers and cargo by 2030, the current funding system is not up to the job of ensuring airports will have the infrastructure they need to handle such dramatic increases in traffic. This will have far-reaching consequences. Commercial airports are powerful economic engines, generating 10.5 million jobs and $1.2 trillion for the U.S. economy, according to a new Airports Council International-North America study. Across the country, workers and businesses count on local airports to attract investment and move people and goods around the world. Since 2001, the total number of jobs associated with airports has increased by more than 50 percent. Despite unprecedented growth and clear evidence of the economic benefits of infrastructure investments, airports expect to have $80 billion in unmet needs through 2015 because of the flawed system used to pay for infrastructure projects. That has not always been the case. Airports generated millions of jobs and trillions of dollars for local communities between 2001 and 2010 because President Bill Clinton and Congress made two decisions to improve airport infrastructure planning and investment in 2000. The...

Words: 41248 - Pages: 165

Premium Essay

Game Change

...GAME CHANGE OBAMA AND THE CLINTONS, MCCAIN AND PALIN, AND THE RACE OF A LIFETIME JOHN HEILEMANN AND MARK HALPERIN FOR DIANA AND KAREN Contents Cover Title Page Prologue Part I Chapter One – Her Time Chapter Two – The Alternative Chapter Three – The Ground Beneath Her Feet Chapter Four – Getting to Yes Chapter Five – The Inevitables Chapter Six – Barack in a Box Chapter Seven – “They Looooove Me!” Chapter Eight – The Turning Point Chapter Nine – The Fun Part Chapter Ten – Two For the Price of One Chapter Eleven – Fear and Loathing in the Lizard’s Thicket Chapter Twelve – Pulling Away and Falling Apart Chapter Thirteen – Obama Agonistes Chapter Fourteen – The Bitter End Game Part II Chapter Fifteen – The Maverick and His Meltdown Chapter Sixteen – Running Unopposed Chapter Seventeen – Slipping Nooses, Slaying Demons Part III Chapter Eighteen – Paris and Berlin Chapter Nineteen – The Mile-High Club Chapter Twenty – Sarahcuda Chapter Twenty-One – September Surprise Chapter Twenty-Two – Seconds in Command Chapter Twenty-Three – The Finish Line Epilogue – Together at Last Index Author’s Notes About the Authors Copyright About the Publisher Prologue BARACK OBAMA JERKED BOLT upright in bed at three o’clock in the morning. Darkness enveloped his low-rent room at the Des Moines Hampton Inn; the airport across the street was quiet in the hours before dawn. It was very late December 2007, a few days ahead of the Iowa caucuses. Obama had been sprinting flat out...

Words: 160589 - Pages: 643

Free Essay

Bush

...FAMILY OF SECRETS The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government, and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years RUSS BAKER Contents Foreword by James Moore 1. How Did Bush Happen? 2. Poppy’s Secret 3. Viva Zapata 4. Where Was Poppy? 5. Oswald’s Friend 6. The Hit 7. After Camelot 8. Wings for W. 9. The Nixonian Bushes 10. Downing Nixon, Part I: The Setup 11. Downing Nixon, Part II: The Execution 12. In from the Cold 13. Poppy’s Proxy and the Saudis 14. Poppy’s Web 15. The Handoff 16. The Quacking Duck 17. Playing Hardball 18. Meet the Help 19. The Conversion 20. The Skeleton in W.’s Closet 21. Shock and . . . Oil? 22. Deflection for Reelection 23. Domestic Disturbance 24. Conclusion Afterword Author’s Note Acknowledgments Notes Foreword When a governor or any state official seeks elective national office, his (or her) reputation and what the country knows about the candidate’s background is initially determined by the work of local and regional media. Generally, those journalists do a competent job of reporting on the prospect’s record. In the case of Governor George W. Bush, Texas reporters had written numerous stories about his failed businesses in the oil patch, the dubious land grab and questionable funding behind a new stadium for Bush’s baseball team, the Texas Rangers, and his various political contradictions and hypocrisies while serving in Austin. I was one of those Texas journalists. I spent about a decade...

Words: 249168 - Pages: 997