Free Essay

Adsfg

In:

Submitted By ebu40938
Words 504
Pages 3
Research paper on Linear Programming Problem

Productivity growth and efficiency change in Indian banking: Technology effect vs catch-up effect Name: Gajanan S Ghadlinge
Roll No. 18, MMS-I

Document Information: | Title: | Productivity growth and efficiency change in Indian banking:Technology effect vs catch-up effect | Author(s): | Lakshmi Kumar, Institute for Financial Management and Research (IFMR), ChennaiD. Malathy, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Madras, Chennai, andL.S. Ganesh, Department of Management Studies, IIT Madras, Chennai, India | Citation: | Surender Kumar, (2006) "A decomposition of total productivity growth: A regional analysis of Indian industrial manufacturing growth", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55 Iss: 3/4, pp.311 - 331 | Publisher: | Journal of Advances in ManagementResearch Vol. 7 No. 2, 2010pp. 194-218#Emerald Group Publishing Limited0972-7981DOI 10.1108/09727981011084995 | Abstract: | Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to understand the influence of technology change in the banking sector by employing data envelopment analysis (DEA) and also to determine the change in total factor productivity (TFP) and its components, namely technical change and technical efficiency change.Design/methodology/approach– The DEA method has been used to assess the efficiency of the entire banking sector and the bank groups. The purpose has been to investigate TFP change and its components’ (obtained using Malmquist index) influence on the growth in the banking sector as well as in the four bank groups. In doing so, for each bank group the levels of technical efficiency, technical efficiency change, efficiency change and TFP change have been estimated. Further investigation has been done to determine if significant differences in these exist between the different bank groups in terms of size, time period and ownership. The determinants of productivity have been assessed.Findings– The TFP growth over the entire period (1995-2006) was driven by technical change as compared to efficiency change, showing that technology and innovation had a greater impact than efficiency change, or the catch-up effect. The fixed effects estimates of the determinants of TFP change and its components show that size, ownership and time period exert significant effect on technical change.Practical implications– The results of the analysis presented in this paper suggest that policies that result in efficiency change are likely to have little impact on the future prospects of the banking sector relative to policies that foster the adoption of the latest technologies. This has exactly been the focus of Reserve Bank of India and though some banks may consider it as an imposition of technology, the result of this requirement appears to be positive as is apparent from this paper’s analysis.Originality/value– The value of this paper comes from the empirical testing that in the Indian banking sector growth in the more recent period came from technology change or frontier shifts as compared to efficiency change. Also, growth is larger due to frontier shifts than due to efficiency change. This endorses Lucas’ findings regarding the focus on the positive impacts of deregulation and competition in the Indian banking sector |

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Aasafdasdf Adsfg Ds Df

...[pic]ewikvj kn‡ii wcVv we‡µZv‡`i Rxeb I RxweKv M‡elYv g‡bvMÖvd mv_x ivq cixÿvi †ivjt 9359931 wkÿvel©t 2008-2009 mgvRweÁvb wefvM miKvix we.Gg.K‡jR, ewikvj| ewikvj kn‡ii wcVv we‡µZv‡`i Rxeb I RxweKvt ewikvj wmwU K‡cv©‡ik‡bi 20 bs Iqv‡W©i †cÖwÿ‡Z GKwU mgvRZvwË¡K M‡elYv| M‡elYv g‡bvMÖvd ‡KvW bst 2042 g‡bvMÖvdwU RvZxq wek¦we`¨vj‡qi Aaxb 2008-2009 wkÿve‡l©i wm‡jevm Abyhvqx mgvRweÁvb 4_© el© | (m¤§vb) cixÿv- 2012 Gi AvswkK kZ© c~i‡Yi Rb¨ `vwLj Kiv n‡jv) Dc¯’vcbvq mv_x ivq cixÿvi †ivjt 9359931 wkÿvel©t 2008-2009 ZË¡veavq‡bt Rbve, gvndyRv AvLZvi, cÖfvlK, mgvR weÁvb wefvM miKvix we Gg K‡jR, ewikvj| b‡f¤^i, 2014 mgvRweÁvb wefvM miKvix we.Gg.K‡jR, ewikvj| ‡NvlYv cÎt Avwg mv_x ivq †NvlYv KiwQ †h RvZxq wek¦we`¨vj‡qi Aax‡b 2008-2009 wkÿv e‡l©i wm‡jevm Abyhvqx mgvRweÁvb 4_© e‡l©i (m¤§vb) cixÿv 2012 Gi AvswkK kZ© c~i‡Yi Rb¨ `vwLjK…Z Òewikvj kn‡ii wcVv we‡µZv‡`i Rxeb I RxweKvÓ wk‡ivbv‡g g‡bvMÖvdwU Avgvi wbR¯^ cÖ‡Póvq iwPZ| †idv‡iÝ e¨wZZ Gi †Kvb Ask ûeû Ab¨ Drm †_‡K mivmwi †jLv nqwb Ges cÖ‡qvR¨ mKj †ÿ‡Î h‡_vchy³ cÖwµqv AbymiY K‡i DØ„wZ cÖ`vb Kiv n‡q‡Q| G g‡bvMÖvdwU Ab¨ †Kvb cÖwZôv‡b Qvcvi Rb¨ †cÖib Kiv wKsev Ab¨ †Kvb wWwMÖ AR©‡bi Rb¨ `vwLj Kiv nqwb| ZwiLt mv_x ivq cÖZ¨qb cÎ RvZxq wek¦we`¨vj‡qi Aax‡b 2008-2009 wkÿve‡l©i wm‡jevm Abyhvqx mgvRweÁvb 4_© el© (m¤§vb) cixÿv Gi AvswkK kZ© c~i‡Yi Rb¨ `vwLjK…Z Òewikvj kn‡ii wcVv we‡µZv‡`i Rxeb I RxweKvÓ wk‡ivbv‡g g‡bvMÖvdwU Avgvi wbR¯^ cÖ‡Póvq iwPZ n‡q‡Q| bxwZgvjv...

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5