critically reflect and response to Hegel‘s and Trevor-Roper's comments about Africa
Introduction
In the mid nineteenth century, the German thinker Hegel, in his original Lectures on the Philosophy of History, pronounced that Africa is no verifiable part of the world; it has no development or improvement to show. Over 100 years after the fact, in 1965, then the Oxford University educator Hugh Trevor-Roper reverberated Hegel's notion. He pronounced that maybe, later on, there will be some African history to instruct. However, at present there is none, or next to know: there is just the historical backdrop of the Europeans in Africa. The rest is to a great extent murkiness, and obscurity is not a subject of history. Such assumptions are demonstrative of a bigot perspective and a general doubt of African accomplishments. Other than prejudice, in any case, explanations denying that Africa has a history are established in an essential origination of legitimate verifiable sources. It was trusted that social orders' advancements towards change and advance should have been recorded in composing structure at the general time that they happened. It was this emphasis on composing archives that rendered Africa's past imperceptible to the history specialist specifically and the more extensive open when all is said in done. Most African people groups did not create composing frameworks until the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years. Subsequently, there was a scarcity of composing records that students of history could attract on to study Africa's past. The few composed records originated from outside spectators, for example, early European shippers and voyagers. Henceforth, it was generally held that Africa had no history.
Maybe one may contend that, Trevor-Roper, Hegel and individuals who have said that there is no history in Africa were taking a gander at development and paper sources. By and by, I trust history go way past the two said above. The general history of Africa is, specifically, a background marked by thoughts and civic establishments, social orders and foundations. It depends on a wide assortment of sources, including oral convention and artistic expressions (General History of Africa (1993) altered by Ali A. Mazrui and C. wondji). As indicated by the Oxford English Dictionary history is the investigation of past occasions; the past. The Cambridge International Dictionary of English likewise considers history to be something that has been done or experienced by a specific person or thing more than once over a long stretch. The word history is a Greek word history, indicates request, learning gained by examination. History is the disclosure, accumulation, association, and presentation of data about past occasions. All the above on history lets us know the there is a whole other world of history than simply composed materials and development. The citation by Trevor-Roper has two (2) measurements: He says the history started when the white man came and you can obviously see that, for Trevor-Roper, if there is no composed material, then there is no history, however Africans have constructed their history in light of oral history so Trevor-Roper's contention does not hold water and comes up short on the grounds that before the white man came to Africa there were a considerable measure of things going on. He has displayed an abnormal state of lack of awareness in African issues.
The Trevor-Roper Trap or the Imperialism of History, declared that back in the mid 1960's the recognized Professor Hugh Trevor-Roper of Oxford University broadcasted, as each Africanist likely knows, that at any rate pre-pilgrim Black African had no history. He more likely than not implied what he said, for he rehashed his dispute in 1969 by putting the mark unhistoric on the African mainland; the entire of the African continent that is, including Egypt, Ethiopia and the Maghrib. History lets us know that development began route back in Egypt, which is in Africa so what does Trevor-Roper call that one? Murkiness? Africa's extraordinary human advancements made a colossal commitment to the world, which is still wondering about by individuals today. Antiquated Egypt, which initially created more than 5000 years back, is a standout amongst the most striking of these human advancements and one of the main governments anyplace on the planet. However, even before the ascent of this human progress, the prior government of The Seti was established in Nubia, in what is today the Sudan. Egypt of the Pharaohs is best known for its incredible landmarks and accomplishments of designing, (for example, the Pyramids), however it likewise made extraordinary advances in numerous different fields as well. The Egyptians, delivered early types of paper and a composed script. They built up the timetable as well and made imperative commitments in different branches of arithmetic, for example, geometry and variable based math, and it appears to be likely that they comprehended and maybe created the utilization of zero. They made essential commitments in mechanics, rationality, watering system and design. In pharmaceutical, the Egyptians comprehended the body's reliance on the cerebrum more than 1000 years before the Greek researcher, Democritus. A few students of history now trust that antiquated Egypt had an imperative impact on old Greece, and they indicate the way that Greek researchers, for example, Pythagoras and Archimedes considered in Egypt, and that the work of Aristotle and Plato was to a great extent in light of prior grant in Egypt. For instance, what is normally known as Pythagoras' hypothesis was known not old Egyptians, many years before Pythagoras' introduction to the world.
On the substance of it there is little motivation behind why we ought to trouble with this kind of perspective now in the 1990s. All things considered, the torrential slide of articles and books on African history, including a few multi-volume General Histories – which have been distributed subsequent to the 19960s, one might say bear confirmation to the ludicrousness of Trevor-Roper's position. Walter Rodney (1972) a West Indian Marxist student of history from Guyana is well-known for his book How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. The book was distributed for various reasons and one reason for this present book's allure is the writer's significant information on African history and his expertise in utilizing this learning to dishonor those numerous European scholars of the past who considered Africans primitive and who reverberated the infamous articulation of Hugh Trevor-Roper that, Africa has no history. As indicated by Professor Adu Boahen, Trevor-Roper is a man who had never done any genuine exploration in Africa, yet he learned about sufficiently certain of sheer scholarly obliviousness to put forth that expression.
There has been presence in Africa before the white man came to Africa and there is no presence without history. For instance, amid the period that the white man had not come to Africa, Africa was composed into political, social, social and financial establishments. Prior in the ace frontier Africa, that is before the European came to Africa, Africa had its own particular political association which manages who ought to have power. There were two (2) sorts of state frameworks in Africa, specifically the unified and non-brought together. In the non-brought together a framework which is likewise called ACEPHALOUS power or power and rights were given to older folks, ministers and age grade frameworks. The incorporated framework has one individual in whose hand force was vested. It was the effective lords and high-positioning boss like the leaders of Oyo (Yuroba) or Asante in West Africa. So by this one, there is a figure head who has the ability to run the show. It is apparent that there were individuals in Africa and this happened in Africa before the Europeans reached Africa to stop Africa's improvement.
Once more, much sooner than the white man came to Africa; Africans were composed into a little family units, assembled into a few units called factions. The families were sorted out by a name, mark and can be sued and they had attributes like the head of the tribe, gathering of older folks, name and epithet, claimed properties, just to say a couple of things here. All these go far to give confirm that there was presence in Africa, thus I don't concur with Trevor-Roper when he says Africa does not have a history.
Some would contend, obviously that Trevor-Roper and others are taking a gander at composing archives to show history however is that the main thing which can store history? A few million years back before the Europeans came to Africa, the African mainland was possessed by Black Africans and this is apparent in Archeology, Ancient Record, Musicology, Rock expressions, Monuments, Numismatics, Oral history, etc. For instance Archeology which is the experimental investigation of prior development and past human societies, gives proven that there has been a presence on the African landmass particularly when individuals uncovered parts of Africa and found relics. It has been found that a long way from having no history, it is likely that mankind's history really started in Africa. The most seasoned proof of human presence and that of our prompt predecessors has been found in Africa. In July 2002 additional confirmation of the presence of early primates in Africa was founded with the revelation of the fossilized stats of what has been called Sahelanthropus tchadensis, thought to be between 6-7 million years of age, in Chad. The most recent investigative examination focuses on the way that every single individual is prone to have African progenitors. This lets us know that there was life in Africa even before the white man came to Africa and that is history.
Another case is antiquated records and reports. Reports like Tarik Al Fatah, Ibn Bahata and other Arabic researchers and record managers stored in Cairo Universities are all proof that indicates the way that individuals had possessed Africa long back. There are records which are furtively put away in Libya colleges which propose that there were Trans-Sahara Trade by the early Africans and Arabs is confirmation that there was life by dark Africans on the African landmass. Musicology, which is the academic investigation of music likewise gives confirmation of presence in Africa before the European came. This is on the grounds that the music kind in Africa can be followed to old mediums. The class of music the Africa has lets us know that individuals lived in Africa. Some of which are played at celebrations. Once more, Africans demonstrated their adoration for workmanship through rock expressions by individuals who lived long back. They didn't utilize papers yet made craftsmanship on rocks. The stone depictions in the Basuti Land in South Africa and Tassili are confirmations. We can likewise say the stone workmanship is Egypt when they utilized pictures on the divider to tell stories, their creative abilities and dreams. All these and numerous different things space won't permit me to say are confirmations that there were individuals in Africa before the Europeans came to Africa. Africa had a history and still has a history.
Conclusion
It is not genuine that Africa has no history. It is apparent from the above examinations that Africa has a history which did not begin with the Europeans. Africans and the African mainland have made colossal commitments in mankind's history pretty much as different people groups and landmasses have. It is the improvement of Eurocentric and bigot sees in Europe that have denied this and looked to nullify the historical backdrop of Africa and its people groups.
Reference
G.W.F. Hegel, The Philosophy of History, translated by J. Jibree, New York: Dover, 1956.
Hugh Trevor-Roper, The Rise of Christian Europe, London: Thames and Hudson, 1965.
Coventry, L. and Nixon, M. (Eds.) (1999). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Encyclopedia (2003). A History of Africa: The Original Africans. Retrieved May 04, 2016 from http://xenohistorian.faithweb.com/africa/af01.html
Fuglestad, F. (2005). The Ambiguities of History: The Problem of Ethnocentrism in Historical Writing. (8). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Fuglestad, F. (1992). The Trevor-Roper Trap or the Imperialism of History. An Essay: JUSTOR: History in Africa (vol. 19) pp. 309-326 retrieved May 04, 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3172003?uid=3738072&nid=...
Hegel, G. W. F., (1956). The Philosophy of History, trans. J. Jibree. New York: Dover http://www/spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Histrevo.htm
Ki-Zerbo, J. (Ed).(1995). General History of Africa (Vol. 1): Methodology and African Prehistory. California: University of California Press
Mazrui, A. A. and Wondji, C. (Ed.)(1993). General History of Africa (8). California: University of California Press.
Procter, P. (Ed.)(1894). Cambridge International Dictionary of English.
Thompson, Paul, The voice of the Past. Oral History, 2nd edition Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1988