Free Essay

Alignment of Academic Standards with Ell Proficiency Standards

In:

Submitted By kthornton57
Words 1348
Pages 6
December 2, 2012
English Language Teaching: Foundations and Methodologies

Alignment of Academic Standards with ELL Proficiency Standards In 2001 the federal government put into action what is known as the No Child Left Behind Act or the NCLB, changing the foundations and the administration of educational instruction in our American educational systems. Written within the federal law of the No Child Left Behind Act the government requires states to include English Language Learning or ELL students in state assessments and assess students language proficiency with valid, reliable assessments in the areas of oral language and reading and writing skills, but more specifically comprehension of speaking, reading, listening, and writing the English language. Also included in the NCLB Act are the provisions that these assessments given must also assist in assessing students in their attainment of the states academic achievement standards. (NCLB, 2001) With the development and creation of these federal standards being implemented into the educational system a new approach needed to be maid and assessed in how states and schools were acclimating and appropriately assessing English Language Learners. With the ever so growing population of non-English speaking students being implemented into the government regulated educational systems over the last several decades something needed to change. Even just the population and growth of English Language Learners has increased by over 20% in just the past several years and is only expected to increase with time. It is clearly stated that children whom are not English speaking or those that are disabled or disadvantaged in any way shape or form still have the right to a fair and just education, just like the rest. Because of the wide span of English language learning students over the United States something that would regulate and serve as a wide spread requirement and or benchmark needed to be implemented in the education system and through the NCLB Act it was done. Now that the states across the board had to adhere and abide by assessment regulations and academic standards with the NCLB Act, the question laid in question of how exactly the English language learning children would fit into this picture. The government came up with the agreement that there will be an overall expectation of what the academic standards that must be met and assessments will be given with the expectation of the students to pass in the general education classes, however they would specifically let each state come up with their own individual guidelines and protocols that would match up with this expectation. The tricky part is that it has to intertwine with the state and government academic standards. For an example the Arizona or TESOL English language learner standards are required to work individually as a state but are also required to adhere and administer the governmental requirements. This is done by specifically grouping the English language learning students into categories so to speak. These groups or categories that are put into action are there for no other reason than to identify what each child’s level of comprehension and ability to speak, listen, read and write the English language. There are a series of levels that are tailored or tiered off into individual categories for the age ranges. These categories are all requirements and the overall framework and foundations to build off of, but are also requirements of the government no matter what state you reside in it stays the same. The standards are known as the ELP or the English language Proficiency Standards. The ELP standards are sub categorized off into several different sections starting with the age ranges, and ending up with individual achievement and comprehension. The first and foremost important factor is the age in which a child is, making the students be appropriately sectioned by developmental ability and accuracy in cognitive functions. There are four categories within the age bracket starting with kindergarten through second grade, then third to fifth grade, sixth through eighth grade and then finally ninth through twelfth grade. After the appropriate age range has been identified and appropriately intertwined with their peers, you can then assess what level of English they utilize and understand. The first level is an entering level emerging all the way up to a bridging level meaning they are ready to be immersed into the general education classrooms with a full understanding and comprehension and the full ability to utilize the English language. Of course this is the overall ultimate goal for all students and through consistent and accurate documenting and testing through the assessments they will all reach a bridging level as soon as possible. After an appropriate level of English language proficiency standards have been assessed and identified the students need to be tested on their understandings of the overall general academic standards. These standards are tested with the alignment of the academic requirements for all American students. The first standard tested and assessed is the overall comprehension and mastery in social and instructional abilities. The overall assessment focuses on the level the “English language learners communicate in English for social and instructional purposes within the school setting”. (Lisboa, 2004) The next level of assessment strictly focuses on Language Arts, looking for the ability of the “English language learners’ ability to communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area”. (Lisboa, 2004) The third level of assessment focuses on mathematics following the same expectations of having the “English language learner communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area” (Lisboa, 2004), and the next two levels of assessment will assess the same overall comprehension as well. The fourth level of assessment area is in Science, and the fifth level of assessment in Social Studies. Now each one of these five levels of assessments are then broken down further with the individual understanding and mastery in reading, writing, listening and speaking within each level of domain. A child might understand how to listen and speak thoroughly in science, however they have not yet mastered and score really low in reading and writing in science. This is how a teacher can specifically utilize the content by collecting data from all of the various sources in the testing process and can not only see exactly the level of understanding at the beginning of the year but can keep an accurate level of data collection to compare with the standards based instruction required. Throughout this entire identification process that happens with the English language proficiency standards it provides the educators with a pretty specific level of where a child stands academically with all of the academic standards requirements. It is at this stage when an instructor can actively assess and acknowledge where a child sits with their comprehension of subject matter, but also their level of understanding of the English language especially in specific subjects. With the collection of this very subject specific testing the instructors can accurately identify what a child’s strengths and weaknesses are and can be prepared and aware of the areas in which they will need more assistance and resources to be provided for understanding. With the appropriate levels of academic standards being addressed and taught not only for the academic standards expected of all children in the schooling systems nationwide, but even for the English language learning students the hope and reason for the integration is success on both the English language proficiency standards as well. This really creates and level of understanding for everyone involved in a child’s educational journey, and creates a higher level of success for all involved.
References:
Lisboa, Robin M. (2004). English Language Proficiency Standards. Division of English Language Learning. Illinois State Board of Education. Retrieved on December 1, 2012 from http://www.isbe.state.il.us/bilingual/htmls/elp_standards.htm
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Pub. L. 107-110, Jan 8, 2002. Statute 115.1425- 2094.
The Arizona K-12 Academic Standards. English Language Learners. The Arizona Department of Education. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www.azed.gov/english-language-learners/elps/forms/

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

English Profeciency

...English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PRACTICE Edited by Jamal Abedi U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , D AV I S • S C H O O L O F E D U C A T I O N Copyright © 2007 The Regents of the University of California The work reported herein was supported in part by the National Research and Development Centers, PR/Award Number R305A050004, as administered by the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The findings and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the Institute of Education Sciences, or the U.S. Department of Education. T his study required the participation of all fifty states, their assessment directors, particularly those involved with the NCLB Title III assessments. Their cooperation and patience is much appreciated, and their dedication to educating young people is greatly admired. We cannot thank the states enough for their collaboration with this project. Many people generously contributed to the development of this report. We are especially indebted to the chapter authors for their invaluable contributions and for their patience throughout this process. Sue Rigney from the U.S. Department of Education contributed greatly to the quality of this work by providing excellent comments and suggestions. We are so grateful for her support, advice and contribution to this report. Kathleen Leos of the U.S...

Words: 115272 - Pages: 462

Premium Essay

Intellegences

...for ELLs According the Echevarria, Vogt, and Short (2013), the 44 states that implemented the Common Core Standards these states are working “to ensure the required standards are included and the U.S. Department of Education (USED) is requiring participating states to revise their NCLB assessments” (p.8). While this alignment of standards promotes a unity between states and helps to promote college preparedness (p.8), it fails at considering the needs of English language learners. Some states, like Illinois and Arizona have created standards that help teachers to understand ELLs and consequently develop instruction that can be differentiated for their various proficiency levels. No two ELLs enter school at the same proficiency level or with the same experiences. This diversity makes it quite challenging for teachers to accommodate every learner. Consequently, teachers can use the Arizona English learner standards to supplement the Common Core Standards in an attempt to differentiate instruction for their ELLs. The standards address all proficiency levels, including pre-emergent, emergent, basic, low intermediate, high intermediate, and proficient. Obviously, the strategies that are adequate for general education students and proficient ELLs would not suffice for those at the pre-emergent or even the low intermediate stage. Therefore, differentiation is absolutely necessary. Differentiation would vary at the different stages as well as take into consideration ELL proficiency...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ell Proficiency Standards

...Alignment of Academic Standards with ELL Proficiency Standards Laura Hardin Grand Canyon University ESL-523N May 8, 2011 Abstract This essay focuses on standards-based instruction and its effects on English language learners. Furthermore, this discussion will address the purpose for creating ELL Standards and the resulting benefits the standards provide both teachers and students within ELL departments throughout the country. As the amount of second language learners steadily increases, it is critical that the components necessary to decrease the language barriers, which can negatively affect students’ daily performance, be analyzed and modified as necessary. In 1983, a report titled, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, was released under President Reagan’s National Commission on Excellence in Education (“A Nation at Risk”, 2006). The statistical information gathered in this report compared the performance of American high school and college students to that of their peers in other advanced countries. This study identified several risk factors in regard to the public education system in the United States. For example, commission research found that American students failed to place first or second on any of the nineteen academic tests administered internationally and in fact placed last on seven of those nineteen assessments (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983). In addition, the study showed a steady decline...

Words: 1180 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Interview with Curriculum Specialist

...educator, how would you describe the purpose of education in our society? What do you feel are the major influences on what happens in the educational community? I feel the purpose of education in society is to help all students realize their full potential in being a successful and contributing member of society. The major influences include the political climate, technological advances, and community values and expectations. 3. To what extent do you feel the curriculum of your school (school system) is consistent with the vision/mission statement of your school or school system? The mission statement of our school system is: It is the mission of the Anne Arundel County Public Schools to educate all students to the highest standards and to eliminate the achievement gaps among all student groups. We will do this by: • Holding high expectations for all students; • Building positive...

Words: 4411 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Fgeashre

...METHODS OF TEACHING LINGUISTICALLY DIVERSE STUDENTS LEDU 341/ SEED 541 SPRING 2015 ------------------------------------------------- PROFESSOR/CLASS INFORMATION Jenna Canillas Stein M.A. Course: LEDU 341/ SEED 541 Methods for Teaching Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Students Term: Spring 2015 Credit Hours/Units: 3 hours Class Time: Location: Section 01 – Thur. 4:30 -7:15 PM (Multiple Subject) ROOD 57 Section 02 – Thur. 7:20 - 9:50 PM (Single Subject) ROOD 57 E-Mail: Jennifer.stein@biola.edu Office Hours: T-12:45-4:15 PM; Office Location: SOE #20 W- 2:30-4 PM; TH 1-4 PM Meetings with Professor: Email or via SOE (Flora) Office Phone: x5651 School Website: www.biola.edu Dept. Website: http://education.biola.edu ------------------------------------------------- BIOLA UNIVERSITY MISSION STATEMENT TRUTH~TRANSFORMATION~TESTIMONY PATTERNS OF THOUGHT, HEART, AND ACTION The mission of Biola University is biblically centered education, scholarship, and service; equipping men and women in mind and character to impact the world for the Lord Jesus Christ. ------------------------------------------------- SCHOOL OF EDUCATION MISSION/VISION STATEMENT The mission of the School of Education is to equip Christian educators to impact, public, private, mission and homeschools through biblically centered education, scholarship, and service. The vision of the School of Education is to equip a generation...

Words: 7089 - Pages: 29

Free Essay

Essay Formatting

...CORE PROFICIENCIES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS / LITERACY UNIT GRADE 7 “Doping can be that last 2 percent.” OD LL DUCATION www.odelleducation.com OD LL DUCATION Page 1 EVIDENCE-BASED ARGUMENTATION Literacy – the integrated abilities to read texts closely, to investigate ideas and deepen understanding through research, to make and evaluate evidence-based claims, and to communicate one’s perspective in a reasoned way – is fundamental to participation in civic life. Thus, the importance of a literate citizenry was understood and expressed by Thomas Jefferson early in the life of our democratic nation. Today, students face the prospect of participating in a civic life that stretches beyond the boundaries of a single nation and has become increasingly contentious, characterized by entrenched polarization in response to complex issues. Citizens have access to a glut of information (some of which is nothing more than opinion passed off as fact) and are often bombarded by bombast rather than engaged in reasoned and civil debate. Learning the skills and habits of mind associated with argumentation – how to conceive and communicate “arguments to support claims, using valid reasoning and sufficient evidence” [CCSS W1] as well as how to “delineate and evaluate the argument[s]” and “the validity of the reasoning and relevance and sufficiency of the evidence” presented by others [CCSS R8] – is therefore central to students’ civic and academic lives...

Words: 23215 - Pages: 93

Free Essay

National Integration and Tolerance

...National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Introduction About this report This report draws on the results of a sociological survey, desk research, media monitoring and focus group meetings conducted in Georgia in 2006. It provides a review of the legislative framework governing the protection of persons belonging to national minorities in Georgia. It also analyses public perceptions that affect the life of these persons in Georgia as a whole and more specifically in areas where persons belonging to national minorities live in large numbers. The report was prepared in the framework of the National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Program (NITG) by the research group of the implementing agency – the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG), Institute of Social Researchers (ISR) and BCG Research sociological agencies and was supported through consultation and training by the Freedom House. Purpose and Context of the Report NITG program is supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The overall goal of the program is to elaborate a National Integration Strategy and Action Plan (NISAP) on national minorities through participatory approach, to ensure legitimacy, sustainability and sense of ownership towards the document among key stakeholders. Through this process, Georgia will test innovative policies and contribute to the development of best practices as a part of a legally compliant strategy document. The project also aims to build...

Words: 43671 - Pages: 175

Free Essay

Test2

...62118 0/nm 1/n1 2/nm 3/nm 4/nm 5/nm 6/nm 7/nm 8/nm 9/nm 1990s 0th/pt 1st/p 1th/tc 2nd/p 2th/tc 3rd/p 3th/tc 4th/pt 5th/pt 6th/pt 7th/pt 8th/pt 9th/pt 0s/pt a A AA AAA Aachen/M aardvark/SM Aaren/M Aarhus/M Aarika/M Aaron/M AB aback abacus/SM abaft Abagael/M Abagail/M abalone/SM abandoner/M abandon/LGDRS abandonment/SM abase/LGDSR abasement/S abaser/M abashed/UY abashment/MS abash/SDLG abate/DSRLG abated/U abatement/MS abater/M abattoir/SM Abba/M Abbe/M abbé/S abbess/SM Abbey/M abbey/MS Abbie/M Abbi/M Abbot/M abbot/MS Abbott/M abbr abbrev abbreviated/UA abbreviates/A abbreviate/XDSNG abbreviating/A abbreviation/M Abbye/M Abby/M ABC/M Abdel/M abdicate/NGDSX abdication/M abdomen/SM abdominal/YS abduct/DGS abduction/SM abductor/SM Abdul/M ab/DY abeam Abelard/M Abel/M Abelson/M Abe/M Aberdeen/M Abernathy/M aberrant/YS aberrational aberration/SM abet/S abetted abetting abettor/SM Abeu/M abeyance/MS abeyant Abey/M abhorred abhorrence/MS abhorrent/Y abhorrer/M abhorring abhor/S abidance/MS abide/JGSR abider/M abiding/Y Abidjan/M Abie/M Abigael/M Abigail/M Abigale/M Abilene/M ability/IMES abjection/MS abjectness/SM abject/SGPDY abjuration/SM abjuratory abjurer/M abjure/ZGSRD ablate/VGNSDX ablation/M ablative/SY ablaze abler/E ables/E ablest able/U abloom ablution/MS Ab/M ABM/S abnegate/NGSDX abnegation/M Abner/M abnormality/SM abnormal/SY aboard ...

Words: 113589 - Pages: 455