Free Essay

American Political Controversies

In:

Submitted By ehrose
Words 2003
Pages 9
* Controversy- etymology (word origin)
From Latin: “against” (contra) and “versus” (verse)
Contra = against or in comparison with
Implies difference of opinion or contrast
Verse = line of writing
Implies opinions expressed in some type of public arena
Controversy- definition
A prolonged public dispute or debate. Disputation concerning a matter of opinion.
“Prolonged” - matters are unsettled over time, lasting
“Public” – not private, concerning people as a whole
“Dispute / debate” – challenge, taking exception to
“Opinion” – personal belief or judgment
Synonyms of controversy- disagreement, difference
ALSO- contention, strife, argument, dissonance, lack of harmony, heated conflict
Controversy- Denotation v. connotation
Denotation = meaning
The most direct, exact, specific meaning of a work or expression
Literal meaning- meaning without interpretation, embellishment, or exaggeration
A dictionary definition.
Subjective and “cold”
Connotation = suggestion
Emotional coloration
Suggested or implied meaning in addition to what is explicit, objected, denoted
Impression that goes beyond a defined meaning
Emotional association with a word, phrase, idea
Subjective and emotively “loaded”
September 17
Democracy- people, common people. People’s rule.
Types of democracy
Direct- when all members of a community (polity, group) gather together and individuals cast a vote or make decisions=each person is given a chance to influence the policymaking process
Representative- when one person or a group of people are elected and assigned with the task of making decisions on behalf of the group of citizens (“constituency”) that they represent
Voters- demos – choose (elect) representatives for a public office through the act of voting
Voting = a formal expression of preference for a candidate that is made known through a marked ballot
We assume that we as voters choose our representatives
Why do incumbents have such an advantage?
Electoral benefits (office; paid employees and staff and unpaid staff, unlimited paid trips to their districts, unlimited long-distance calls, providing services to and serving voters)
Campaign contributions (money; financial backing by interest groups- “war chests”)
Name recognition (running at least one successful campaign, media exposure)
…and… electoral districts?
Representatives choose voters
“As a mapmaker, I can have more of an impact on an election than a campaign.. more of an impact than a candidate.” –David Winston, GOP redistricting consultant in 1990 redistricting- the process of redrawing legislative districts if you live in the united states, you live in a district. All representatives to the US are house of reps, state legislatures, and many local offices are elected from districts goal of redistricting- to eliminate competition, to create “safe” districts for a political party.
“safe” district/seat- a seat that at election is sure to be held by the same party as held before.
“Marginal” district/seat- a seat held with a small majority in a legislative election. *

1776- the continental congress adopts the d\Declaration of Independence
13 American colonies (then at war with Great Britain) are independent states
July 4: the wording of the Declaration is approved by congress
1781- the Articles of Confederation established (written in 1777)
The US is a confederation of 13 states: individual states maintain considerable autonomy
Congress has limited powers
Declare wars, establish army and navy, sign treaties, oversee Indian affairs
Regulate weights and measures, run post office
BUT no mandatory power to raise taxes
No Executive or Judiciary powers vested in congress- weak and leaderless government
1787- 55 delegates meet in Philadelphia to produce new constitutional arrangements (originally, to amend the Articles of Confederation): representatives from 12 states attend (except for Rhode Island)
55 are to be known as the founding fathers
Delegates from the state legislatures BUT not directly elected by the people
A secret meeting- in a sense that the delegates lacked the universal mandate-> thus, extra freedom to debate (given the lack of accountability)
Plan: first, produce a document-> then, lobby for its approval
39 out of 55 signed the Constitution
Beard’s Argument #1- Brown’s Counterargument
Charles Beard
1913 published economic interpretation of the constitution of the united states
“Investment portfolios” of the Founding Fathers
Men of considerable “personalty” (holdings other than real estate; bonds):
Public security interests (gov’t bonds)
Land speculation
Money loaned
Investments in manufacture and commerce
Investments in slave trade and slave ownership
Conclusion: they only represented economic interest of financial elites (maximized their financial gains)

* Robert Brown * 50 years after Beard * Response to Argument 1: also looks as investment portfolios of FF * Notices they do have personalty, but ALSO have realty (holdings in real estate) * Says beard failed to recognize this bc: * Beard used secondary sources (method) * Beard is not critical of sources (ideology) * Says men motivated to protect both and * Create laws protecting everyone’s property (realty in particular) * Protect their and everyone else’s rights * Attacks messenger (Beard) which, in turn, undermines Beard’s argument * Appeals to emotions * Concludes that as long as the FF benefitted so did the country as a whole (they protected everyone’s interests) * Similar to the principles of Reagan (trickle down economics) * Beard’s 2nd Argument: * Ratification of the Constitution (through state conventions) * Says ¾ of eligible voters did not vote * 1/6 of the eligible voters voted in favor * Argues that 75% abstained from voting and therefor did not support the Constitution * Of the eligible voters, 8.5% voted against the constitution * Only 16.5% voted in favor of the Constitution * Says there was NO consensual support of the Const. * Concludes that population (adult white males) and the states did NOT support the const. * Brown’s Response to Argument 2: * Says the 75% who didn’t vote are indifferent (tacit support) * ONLY 8.5% of ALL eligible voters voted against * 16.5% voted for it * Argues this means that 91.5% of voters liked it and all 13 states did approve of the const. * Concludes: * Consensus and no partisanship * Ratification followed (democratic) procedural practices of the times * Beard’s argument and Brown’s Counterargument (main focal points) * Beard: personalty interests…Brown: realty interests * ***Look on PowerPoint on oncourse for rest & interpretations!! *** * * 9/10 * Who elects the president? * Originally believed that President is elected by a group of older statesmen (the electoral college) but the emergence of political parties with competing interests and high degree of partisanship led to: * Article II section 1 and the 12th amendment of the constitution: * The president is elected by the electoral college, Americans do not vote directly for a presidential candidate * Members of the electoral college are elected through popular elections on state level * Electors are selected on a state by state basis * Names are not on the ballot * Voters actually choose electors * Number of electors equals the number of representatives and senators in each state * Rules of selecting the electors are determined by individual states but: * States follow the winner takes all mechanism (winning candidate gets all electoral votes from the state) * Who can be an elector? * Any citizen who is not a senator or a representative and a citizen who has not “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the US, or given aid tor comfort to the enemies thereof” * Who are the electors? * Party officials, party leaders, people with direct affiliation with presidential candidates * Electors never meet as one body * Meet in their state capitals on the Monday after the second Wednesday of December and cast their votes on separate ballots for president and vice president * When voting is done, electors certify the vote and send results to DC. * Candidate with the highest number of votes in the electoral college is the president for four years, formally decided at the joint session of congress * If no candidate receives the absolute majority of electoral votes (50%+1), the House of Representatives chooses the Presidential candidate from among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Senate chooses the Vice President from among the two candidates who received the most electoral votes. * Electoral votes * Andrew Jackson 99 * John Quincy Adams 84 * William Harris Crawford 41 * Henry Clay 37 * Total: 261 * Needed to win: 261/2+1=131 * Problem? Jackson had only 99 electoral votes that is, 32 short of the required majority * Solution? Vote in the house of representatives * Result? * Adams 87 * Jackson 71 * Crawford 54 * 9/15 notes * -It is possible for a candidate to not get a single person’s vote- not one – in 39 states or the district of Columbia, yet be elected president by winning the popular vote in just 11 of these 12 states: California, new york, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, new jersey, north Carolina, Georgia, Virginia * -There are 538 total votes in the Electoral College and a presidential candidate must win a majority – 270 – electoral votes to be elected. Since 11 of the 12 states in the chart above account for 271 votes, a candidate could win these states, lose the other 39, and still be elected. * -Arguments that we should NOT have Electoral College * Lawrence Longley v. Robert Weissberg * Longley: “deplorable institution”- 1. Faithless electors * uncertain election outcomes * Weissberg on Longley: 1. Faithless electors * never affected outcome of elections * Longley: 2. Winner takes all. * No absolute majority when more than two candidates * magnifies the power of large states * Weissberg: 2. Winner takes all. * Partisan interest groups in large states never decided/influenced outcomes or gained direct benefits after elections * Longley: 3. Constant two * smallest state have disproportionate amount of power/influence * Weissberg: 3. Constant two * perhaps, but prevents fraud, since outcome is in no doubt * Longley: 4. popular v. electoral vote * problem with legitimacy (minority) presidents * Weissberg: 4. Popular vs. electoral vote * unlikely outcome, happened 3 times * Longley: 5. Contingency procedure (house of representatives) * constitutional crisis if deadlock in the house of representatives * Weissberg: 5. Contingency procedure (house of representatives) * unlikely occurrence (happened once and never past 1824) * * Weissberg “defending a sin”
1. Conservative arguments the system is proven and workable. It works! Its stable!
Conserve, preserve
Practical view; reform, gradual changes
Emphasis on stability; preserves a two-party system in which two major parties:
Must seek a reasonable compromise
Must build broad-based coalitions (thus avoiding divisive politics)
2. Pragmatic argument makes presidential campaign manageable provides little incentives for fraud in small states allows candidates to focus on swing and independent voters- “more important voters” total cost of presidential elections (both candidates):
2008- $1.6 billion
2012- $2.0 billion *
Weissberg Conclusion- ABOLISHING WOULD BE A MISTAKE!
Provides stability and manageability to political system
Provides for modifications if needed
Longley conclusion- ABOLISH!
Neither certain in operation
Nor neutral * September 22, 15
Electoral benefits- office; paid employees and staff and unpaid staff, unlimited paid trips to their districts, unlimited long-distance calls, providing services to and serving voters
Redistricting=the process of redrawing legislative districts
If you live in the united states, you live in a district. All representatives to the US house of representatives, state legislatures and many local offices are elected from districts
Goal- eliminate competition
Gerrymandering- also known as redistricting
Manipulating the boundaries of an electoral district to favor one party
Derived from name of governor Elbridge Gerry of MA
Packing- concentrating like-minded voters together in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts
Cracking- spreading like-minded voters apart across multiple districts to dilute their voting power in each
Is gerrymandering effective?
How redistricting is done
The constitution requires that the house seats should be reapportioned among the states every ten years (following the census)
Issue: but… the constitution does not specify how the states should draw district lines
The constitution does not even specify whether districts are to be required at all
Its expected that the states must make a good-faith effort to draw districts with the same number of people in each district within the state
Who? Who decides how districts are drawn?
State legislatures (note: the majority party controls the process)
Bi partisan or non-partisan commissions (note: the state governor and majority party leaders control who is appointed to these commissions) * Challenge? Can gerrymandering be challenged in courts?
Supreme court opined that political gerrymandering claims could be properly be challenged in courts and manageable standards of redistricting could be
Affects?
Computers
Mapping technology
Detailed knowledge of the political preferences of voters from registration records *

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Native Americans, Struggles, Mascots, Controversy

...Native Americans, Struggles, Mascots, and Controversy There has been a national debate for years over Native American athletic mascots. “Members of the North Carolina Mascot Education and Action Group and the Guilford Native American Association, however, repeatedly told us that they perceived the use of Indian mascots, logos, caricatures, and similar images by our schools as a clear form of institutional racism” (Grier 2005: 51). In this paper we will discuss the controversial impact of the Native American stereotype used as mascots. In the early 1900’s when the threat of colonization was abolished Americans started to use the Native American mascot to show their acknowledgement of their struggles. Although this was symbolic it has been an ongoing controversy within schools and sports. California is the second highest state that uses the most Native American imagery and symbols. The importance of this contemporary issue is an ongoing debate in California that has impacted the true history of Native Americans and the battles they went through. The truth is crucial because their imagery and interpretation is misunderstood in American history. In the early 1900’s it became acceptable to use Native American imagery for advertisement. “One of the reasons why most Americans find the mascots unremarkable and do not turn a critical eye toward the mascots is because of the prevalence of similar images throughout U.S. popular culture” (King, et al 2002:391). Although years later...

Words: 1493 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Recommended Topics

...ENGL 250: #4 Documented Essay Suggested Topics For the Assignment #4 Documented Essay, you will present multiple viewpoints from a currently debated issue. You need to draw your topic from the issues and controversies discussed in Rereading America, or a current debate in anthrozoology (human-animal studies). Here is a list of suggested topics. You may choose one of these, or create your own with instructor approval. Look through the table of contents and chapter introductions in Rereading America and find a debate or a controversy that interests you, and develop your topic in the form of a question that could have multiple answers. Your topic must be narrowly focused enough to cover adequately in a 5-7 page paper. Family & Relationships: * Do children need to be raised by both a mom and a dad? * An increasing number of people are opting not to become parents. Is this bad for society? * Can a parent who uses marijuana recreationally still be a good role model? * Does lifelong monogamous marriage represent the ideal partnership? * Should prostitution be legalized? Is it wrong to pay for sex? * Should the government prohibit genetically engineering babies? * In what circumstances, if any, should assisted suicide be legal? Education: * Should colleges require classes in history, arts, and humanities? * Do too many kids go to college? * Should student loan debts be forgiven? * Should the government fund college educations...

Words: 524 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Washington Redskins Name Change

...Zachary Hagan-Sanchez Should the Washington Redskins Change their name? No, the Washington Redskins should not change their name. They have had the name since the franchise was born in 1937, which is 80 years ago. If people want to change the Washington Redskins name and mascot then there are going to be lots of other teams in professional sports as well as in colleges and high schools that are going to have to change their names too. The Oneida Indian Nation has started a campaign for the NFL to stop using a racial slur as the name of Washington’s football team; they also want the mascot changed to something that is not offensive to Native Americans. They are not wrong about the meaning of the word Redskin, if you look it up in the dictionary it is defined as “Used as a disparaging term for Native American.” The name was not picked 80 years ago to be offensive and a slur and for many decades no one had a problem with it until now. Whether or not the name gets changed there are still going to be people on both sides of the fence that are either going to be happy or upset. I personally think they should just leave it alone and move on. There is always going to some kind of problem whether it is racial or something different, what people need to remember is that we are all human regardless of the color of our skin or the name of a team or what a mascot looks...

Words: 263 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Indian Mascots

...Everyone has heard of at least one team named the “Indians” or “Redskins” or some form of Native Americans, you grow up watching them on ESPN and get accustomed to it. You don’t think that there is anything wrong with a type of person being a mascot; you weren’t raised to question it. Before this week's lesson I didn’t think that there was anything wrong with Indians being a logo for a school, I didn’t think about the fact that the term “redskins” was a racial slur and could be considered offensive. In class we were presented with evidence supporting both sides, should be not have Indian mascots or should there still be Indian mascots. I believe that we should not for the reasons that it is offensive to some Native American tribes. I myself...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fighting Okra Research Paper

...The Legend of the Fighting Okra Since the establishment of Delta State University in 1924, the Statesman has always been the official mascot. Around the late 1980’s some of the baseball and basketball players grew suspicious that this mascot did not “represent” Delta State or “intimidate” the opposing teams that they were to take on. After all, a mascot is supposed to be intimidating, right? The Statesman just was not making the cut for these athletes. They thought hard to create a picture in their head for what could accurately describe the teams. A potential mascot was maybe the Fighting Algae. The color of algae fit but some of the mates were not sure if they were ready to be called “Pond Scum” by the opponents (Mizell,2004). That’s when Bob Black, Delta States baseball pitcher, came up with the Fighting Okra! With the okra having a green color and having such tough skin, it was a perfect match for the University. The baseball players arrived at one of the basketball games and began to chant, “OKRA! OKRA! OKRA!” Unfortunately, the baseball players were removed from the game but the chant stuck and eventually so did the fighting okra. After becoming so popular, the college students put a face to the Fighting Okra which was mean and always ready for a fight. The first official mascot costume was from a male student who took a green sleeping bag and sewed into the Fighting Okra (The History Tavern, 2011). Delta State refused to adopt the Fighting Okra as the...

Words: 552 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Banning Native American Mascots

...End of an Era for Harmful Mascots Professional athletic organizations should have to ban all Native American mascots. Native Americans have dealt with racism and oppression of their people ever since the pilgrims had landed on this continent. They pilgrims started with a slow, methodical push to the Native peoples then started to move them cross country to private ground specified for them. These Native Americans were moved out from their homes. Now, they are expected to respect the use of their own people through mascots. Native American mascots have been used for decades...

Words: 273 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Native American Mascot Names Summary

...In the article State to Reexamine Schools’ Use of Native American Mascot Names the author’s believes that Oregon schools should change their Native American mascot. The author gives many convincing points such as some see the use of Native imagery as an offensive stereotype or a racist practices. He points out that Native American have pushed for the state to do something about the issue. It is very clear where the author stands on this topic. Although the author gives many arguments for his side of the subject, he gives ment counterarguments as well such as the names and mascots may be embedded into the community or that changing the mascot will cost a lot of money because they would have to change gym floors, uniform, signs etc. He brings...

Words: 416 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Offensive Mascots Research Paper

...Mascots Can some mascots be racist? Mascots can be very offensive towards Indian/Native American races because they form stereotypes about different races. These mascots need to be changed, because it is bad for the people being offended, and the community as a whole. People argue that this doesn't hurt the people, but it does, constantly. Everywhere they go there are stereotypical things around them, because of their teams mascot. Some people may say that it would cost to much money to do this kind of operation. Well, first off, it was the school's fault for having their team mascot offend many different religions of Native Americans. Their team mascots can be stereotypical,causing people to think that Native Americans are either “war like”, or “fierce”, when they really aren’t what people think.”It is racist. It is harmful. It is shaming. It is dehumanizing” See-ah-dom Edmo, vice president of the Oregon Indian Education Association. This is why the cost shouldn’t matter of changing these school mascot names....

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Native American Mascots

...will read and view several selections that reflect multiple viewpoints on the same topic and develop and express an opinion on an issue based on the evidence presented. You will develop a product that expresses your point of view about the use of Native American mascots for school or sport teams. Role: You will assume the role of an avid sports fan or the resident of a community that has a sports team with a Native American mascot. Audience: The president of the professional sports team, president of the college or university, or local school board (all with Native American mascots) Situation: Recently Houston ISD joined a growing list of organizations that no longer allows the use of Native American names as mascots for their teams or school. Stanford University, for example, changed its mascot from the Indian to a redwood tree in 1972, and others have followed suit after an NCAA ban and public outrage over what is considered by some to be ethnically offensive stereotypes that belittle Native Americans. Others believe that these names are embraced by fans who are honoring the heritage and history of the American Indian. Your challenge is to review all of the documents in the library and determine whether Native American representations should or shouldn’t be used as team mascots. You must convince your audience of your position by using evidence from at least three of the resources in the document...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Washington Redskins: Should They Change Their Name?

...I think the washington Redskins should change their name because it is offensive, the name has been a hot topic for quite some time, and they could easily change the name to something else. Redskins is a term used by europeans when they first came to the new world. The word was used a reference to the indians darker sometimes reddish tinted skin. The Redskins team name didn't just become a hot topic it's been a hot topic for 31 years. Since 1972 people have been saying how offensive the name is to the native americans. The Redskins may lose the rights to their mascot, and will not have any new stadiums built for the team until the name is changed. Other teams have also changed their names, and it has not change how the fans see them or their profit from the games. The Redskins should change their name because it is the right thing to do if native american beleive the name of a team that represents them should be changed then who are we to say no. “Redskins can't possibly honor a heritage or noble character trait, nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It's an insult, a slur, no matter how benign the present day intent.” said Bob Costas, NBC sports host. The term redskin is originally used to refer the native...

Words: 663 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Native American Mascots

...S. using Native American Mascots.” All sports teams have mascots to represent their schools pride and strength. Mascots generally don’t fall under exploration, except for the ones that represent Native American tribes. These mascots are usually based on inaccurate descriptions of Native Americans causing controversy on whether or not they should be allowed. Many Native American tribes have been feeling offended, which is why the issue has been arising today with well known sports teams including the Fighting Sioux, The Redskins, The Indians, Etc. This controversy has had a dramatic effect due to the widespread ban of many of the Native American tribal sports...

Words: 772 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Indian Mascots You Re Out Analysis

...In the article “Indian Mascots- You’re Out!” on the LA Times, Jack Shakley, discusses the utilization of Native American mascots in games. The author portrays the utilization of Indian mascots throughout history of game. He discusses how it has annoyed a few individuals. The way games can utilize Indian mascots can be extremely segregating. He talks of how the mascots look moronic and does idiotic things before the fans. Shakley’s ethos is that he is Indian himself and his mother felt like Indian mascots weren't worthy (520). The way he utilizes emotion is by making you feel that Indian mascots are awful to have as mascots on the grounds that the ways they are depicted resemble fools. He creator utilizes logos to demonstrate that evolving the mascot of a group isn't shabby; Stanford lost a huge number of dollars when they...

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Cartoon 'Mascots' Lather And Nothing More

...People have virtuous rules, or ethics, they live their life by. The cartoon “Mascots” has kindness, the article “Who Will Save the Savior Sibling” has charity, and the excerpt from “Lather and Nothing More” has temperance. To begin, the use of Native American mascots is not appropriate virtuously because it goes against kindness. In his cartoon ”Mascots”, Phil Hands persuades caucasians to change their Native American mascots because it is insensitive to Native Americans. Native American school has caucasian mascot. The mascot in the cartoon depicts a stereotyped caucasian man to parallel how Native American mascots are used. A real caucasian mascot would insult a large number of caucasian people. Native Americans are insulted by mascots depicting...

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Native American

...years the Native American mascot debate is one that has gotten major press. Native Americans are very angry and want to be heard. The tribal names that these natives go by are something that mean very much to them. School boards, and sports teams around the country have used these mascots, and names to define who the team, and or school is. Today, many people see using Native American names for mascots to be racist. These mascots and cultural figures are part of the Native American culture. To go and generalize these people into a sports team that have nothing to do with who they are, is being very prejudice, misleading, and in many ways wrong. Native Americans deserve the right to be heard and understood that their names, tribal figures, and beliefs are theirs. Mascots used to define them bring nothing but racism, shame, stereotyping, and generalization. Many sports teams, schools, and universities in the US have adopted some incarnation of the Native American warrior as their mascot. However, many people, of Native American heritage as well as non-Indians, believe that the portrayals of Native Americans in this manner is a harmful, racist aspect of our culture, and one that we should take strong measures to prevent. It is not wrong for one to say that racism all around the world needs to be put to an end. We as Americans hold ourselves to high standards of being accepting to all ethnicities. It is hard to understand how we are unable to relate to Native Americans and understand...

Words: 2659 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Sports Names In Sports

...and as a way of familiarizing ourselves we usually point them out by their mascots and names. Little did we know that our team’s mascot or name may be offensive to a particular culture and has an underlying meaning. According to the Director of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of the American Indians, as early as 1912 Indian names for sports teams have been used in the professional sector. Following this example many high schools started naming their teams using Indian culture and the use of Indian inspired Mascots. We may like the way the teams name and its mascots suit them, but to the Native American...

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6