Free Essay

An Argument for Design

In:

Submitted By creed91
Words 1800
Pages 8
Adam Hubert
PHI 150
Dr. Peterson
Intelligent Design
October 27, 2013

Take a moment to think about the world around you and all of its beauty. From the ever flowing Mississippi River, to the ledges of the mighty Grand Canyon, or even to the peak of Mt. Fuji there is an immense amount of things on this Earth that are so incredible it is hard to believe science and chance created these magnificent things. So what is the best explanation for these occurrences? I believe that these occurrences scream of an intelligent designer which also leads us to the existence of God. First I must explain what an argument for design is and then we will look at Paley’s Watchmaker Theory to give us better insight on this argument. Then I will point to Betty and Cordell’s argument that the things of our universe lead us to a belief in God (intelligent designer) and that the Big Bang theory is not the best explanation alone for the existence of God, and that a multiverse is not the best explanation for the existences in our universe. Design arguments most often try to explain the existence of God by pointing to various occurrences and objects within our world and universe that lead us to believe that there is an intelligent designer. According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, design arguments usually consist of three premises. One is a premise that asserts that the material universe exhibits some verifiable property (F); Two is a premise that asserts that (F) is persuasive evidence of intelligent design or purpose; Three concludes that the best or most probable explanation that the material universe exhibits (F) is that there exist an intelligent designer who intentionally brought it about that the material universe exists and exhibits (F) (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). A simpler way to say this is that the theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent designer, and not by other natural happening. This is background of my argument but to give you a better perspective let’s take a look at Paley’s Watchmaker Theory for a clearer understanding. Watches, because of their complexity, are used a lot metaphorically. William Paley didn’t shy away from this in his 1802 book Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity collected from the Appearances of Nature. Paley states, “ Suppose I found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I should hardly think…that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for a stone that happened to be lying on the ground? For this reason, and for no other; namely, that, if the different parts had been differently shaped from what they are, if a different size from what they are, or placed after any other manner, or in any order than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use that is now served by it (Paley Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Paley states that the watch has two features that give reason for an intelligent designer. It performs a function an intelligent designer would give value to (keep time), and the watch could not perform these if its parts or mechanics were arranged differently. Paley then states that this holds true for things in nature. For example, plants, and how they take light and turn it into food for themselves while at the same time providing life for other organisms. The designer would give value to the fact that the plants produce oxygen to give to other organisms, while if the plants did not have their mechanics arranged in the right order (chlorophyll) they would not be able to go through the process of photosynthesis. Paley puts the design argument into a metaphorical perspective that paints a picture of how the design theory works and sets Betty and Cordell up for their take on intelligent design. The Anthropic Teleological Argument presented by L. Stafford Betty and Bruce Cordell states that because it is so unlikely that our universe was randomly generated, there must have been an intelligent designer. Betty and Cordell point to the calculations of many renowned scientist to show that our unique universe could not have existed if the slightest detail were any different than the way it is now. They state, “At this point we must ask ourselves what is easier to imagine and thus to believe; that the cosmos’ entire history should have arisen from this self-creating and self-explaining surd; or that a pre-existing mind and power of vast magnitude should have created the ingredients of the universe and triggered it at the Big Bang? The second alternative seems a little bit more likely… (Betty and Cordell 223).” This argument goes off of inference of the best explanation in the sense that logically it makes more sense and easier to believe that an intelligent designer created the universe rather than a random explosion of matter that started to expand and our universe was formed. This point also creates an objection though, where did God come from and how did he create everything ex nihilo, or out of nothing. The theist should properly respond to this objection by pointing to the definition of God, a wholly good and omnipotent being. So by our human perspective God or the intelligent designer should not be able to create himself, but remember by omnipotent he can do all, for he is all powerful so there is nothing he cannot do. This does not fully reject the idea of the Big Bang though, for who are we to know the process for which the intelligent designer did his work. Remember that his intelligence far surpasses our feeble minds, and what does not quite make sense to our minds could have been the easiest way to create the universe. While I have handled this objection, there is still the idea of a multiverse that I must address. The multiverse theory declares that our universe is not the only one, but states that many universes exist parallel to each other. These different universes within the multiverse are called “parallel universes”, and in these parallel universes there is an infinite amount of universes with an infinite amount of possibilities. So while we breathe oxygen on this planet in this universe, there may be a parallel universe where humans breathe uranium gas. The objection this brings up to the intelligent design argument is that what if our universe was not created intelligently and hat it was just one infinite possibility within a multiverse filled with infinite possibilities. There are multiple objections to counteract this theory though. First off where did this multiverse come from? Just as it is improbable to believe that the Big Bang sparked out of nowhere it is possibly more improbable to believe that an infinite amount of universes just sprang into existence. Secondly what evidence is there to point to the existence of a multiverse? While a lot of times belief in an intelligent designer or God is called a leap of faith according to Paley there is evidence all around us. Some of the things within our universe itself are hard to explain by science alone, take the placement of our planet for instance. If Earth was placed a few inches from where it is now it would not be able to sustain life. It is more reasonable to believe that an intelligent designer was at work to believe that this is a random occurrence in a pool of infinite possibilities. I stand firm in my belief that not only is the intelligent design argument the most attractive but it is also the most probable argument for the existence of our universe. My hopes up to this point is that it is clear for you to see that the intelligent design argument is clearly a logical argument and that it not only explains the existence of God but also helps explain the creation of our universe. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process. There are three premises that typically go with the intelligent design argument, One is a premise that asserts that the material universe exhibits some verifiable property (F); Two is a premise that asserts that (F) is persuasive evidence of intelligent design or purpose; Three concludes that the best or most probable explanation that the material universe exhibits (F) is that there exist an intelligent designer who intentionally brought it about that the material universe exists and exhibits (F). This argument is better explained by Paley’s Watchmaker Theory, in this theory he says that if he is lost in the woods for an extended period of time and there are no signs of life and then all of a sudden he finds a watch it is evident that this watch was created by an intelligent creator. For the watch serves a purpose the designer would find meaningful and it would not be able to fulfill these purposes if it was arranged any differently. Paley then points to nature to help further his point, which sets up Betty and Cordell for their argument. They argue that the occurrences in our universe are more probable with the help of an intelligent designer. Within their argument they point to various scientific arguments to further their point. The argument brings up some objections which are handled by pointing to the definition of God and states that he is so powerful that only he could create the universe ex nihilo, yet this does not mean the Big Bang process did not happen, for God may have done it this way. Finally I handled the objection brought about by the multiverse theory and that it is highly improbable that a multiverse is the reason for our universe for where did this multiverse come from and secondly what evidence is there to prove. Thus leading us to believe that intelligent design is the best argument for the existence of God and the creation of our universe.

Betty, L.S. and B. Cordell. “The Anthropic Teleological Argument” in Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. Ed. M. Peterson, W. Hasker, B. Reichenbach, and D. Basinger. Oxford University Press, 2009. pp 222-230.

Archie, Lee C, "William Paley, ‘The Teleological Argument,’" Philosophy of Religion (June 26, 2006) URL=<http://philosophy.lander.edu/intro/paley.shtml>.

“Intelligent Design” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Design Argument

...The Design Argument The design argument is one of the traditional arguments of the existence of God. This argument has a variety of forms. This is an argument that is in support of God’s existence. Many philosophers have their doubt that a God exists. There are philosophers who have supported the design argument, one of the philosophers being Aqunias. Aquinas attacks the other arguments made against the existence of God. There is a formulation that is close to the one that Aquinas used. The formulation is “(1) Among objects that act for an end, some have minds whereas others do not. (2) An object that acts for an end, but does not itself have a mind, must have been designed by a being that has a mind. (3) Hence, there exists a being with a mind who designed all mindless objects that act for an end.” In these formulations it is being explained that an object (us human beings, or anything) acts for an end, basically stating living our lives through our purpose and purpose only. The design argument is also known as the teleological argument, teleogy meaning purpose. The second point translates into the third, it is saying that there was a being who created us that has a purpose, that being is God. There are two sorts of the design argument, they are the global and local design arguments. A global design argument explains general features of the whole universe and argues that this feature should be explained by the hypothesis that it is the product of intelligent design. So...

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Design Argument

...The Design Argument is also known as the Teleological Argument coming from the Greek word ‘telos’ meaning end/purpose. It is an “a posteriori” argument (from experience) based on empirical evidence (based on the 5 senses). It is synthetic (from observation) and is inductive (there are a number of possible conclusions although one may be more probable). The Design Argument states that the universe has order, purpose, regularity and suitability for human life (Sarah Tyler). Complexities of the universe demonstrate some form of design. The design requires a designer. Therefore, for many, the designer is God of the Classical Theism (Hereafter referred to as God). This argument was first introduced by Socrates, a Greek philosopher, showing that the argument is strong as it has survived the test of time as we are still discussing it in the 21st century so the argument has merit and displays longevity. “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures, how can there be doubt that they are the work of choice or design” cited by Socrates. There is an early belief that there is design in the world. In the 13th century, Thomas Aquinas furthered the design argument through his book, Summa Theologica. He proposed 5 ways to prove the existence of God; one of which was the Teleological argument. For Aquinas, these arguments point to a being “that we call God”. To prove the existence of god, he used the analogy of the archer, arrow and target to show that there must be...

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Design Argument

...Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God. The design argument, also referred to as the Teleological Argument, stemmed from the Greek work ‘telos’ meaning ‘end’ or ‘purpose’. It is an a posteriori argument (from experience) based on our empirical senses and it is synthetic meaning that it is from observation. The argument is also inductive meaning there a number of possible conclusions. The main origin of the Teleological argument is based on a designer commonly known as ‘the classical God of theism’ (hereafter referred to as God). The argument from design find its origins in Thomas Aquinas’ ‘Summa Theleologica’ and is the fifth of his five ways of proving the existence of God. His argument includes the beneficial order in the universe which he observes i.e. there are things in the universe that work towards an end or purpose. He argues that the world is like an arrow shot from an archer’s bow - it has direction and purpose. God is the archer and the world is the arrow. God is controlling the world and as he is the reason behind why it is been created. Aquinas then goes on to say the world works because the designer is God, and so things in nature are ordered for their apparent purpose e.g. trees give us oxygen. However, this is a weak argument because Aquinas is not comparing two similar ideas. William Paley also argues for the design argument. His argument includes several ideas, one of which uses an analogy of a watch and...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Design Argument

...DESIGN (TELEOLOGICAL) ARGUMENTS Design arguments are empirical, a posteriori and synthetic Telos = end/purpose Arguments state that order design purpose God William Paley – the divine watchmaker * This is an argument from analogy * If one came across a stone on a hill, one would conclude that it was there naturally. However, if one came across a watch, one would assume that it was not there naturally. * This is because the watch is complex, harmonious, planned, functional and purposeful * We would say that such a watch must have an intelligent designer. * The universe is similar – there are many different parts that work together harmoniously and in an apparently purposeful way. It is also complex, self-sufficient and interdependent * Therefore we should assume that the universe has an intelligent designer – God * However, arguably the universe is more akin to a stone than a watch – how can nature itself stick out as something unnatural? * Hume – the world is dissimilar to a watch, and so because the effect is different, we cannot infer the same cause * Also, this argument assumes that there is purpose to the universe, even though there is no evidence as such. * There is much disorder in the world due to natural disasters and wars, unlike a watch * If the universe is flawed, this implies that the creator was flawed. God is supposed to be perfect. * This analogy also anthropomorphises God by...

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Design Argument

...Give an account of the fundamental ideas of the design argument for the existence of God. (25 marks) The design argument outlines that the world has been designed, and therefore requires a designer. This designer, has to have been God because he is the only being that has the power and will to do so. This argument is a posteriori because it bases it’s argument on observations within the Universe. It is also an inductive proof because it has more than one possible conclusion. There are a few ideas that support the idea of the world being designed, one of them being Aquinas’s Fifth Way. This idea says that irrational beings are able to work towards a “beneficial order” (an order where the being will eventually work towards a beneficial purpose). Aquinas observed that these irrational beings could work towards this order without having the required intelligence to do so. For example, grey whales annually migrate from the Alaskan Coast to Mexican waters, a journey which stretches further than 20,000 km and lasts 3 months to carry out, in order to reach a beneficial end or purpose. Aquinas concluded that there must have been a higher power that directed them towards this beneficial order, and Aquinas maintained that this was God. He said God must have designed these irrational beings so that they could work towards this beneficial end. Another idea of the design argument is William Paley’s watch analogy. Paley said that if you were to come across a watch in a field, it would...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Complexity Design Argument

...The complexity design argument given by William Paley reasons that the existence of God is evident in the complexity of the natural world. He argues that random events cannot account for the development of life and the systems that comprise our world. Observation of the natural world indicates purposeful design not random events. Purposeful design requires the existence of God. He argues this through the use of analogies and sensibilities; through the comparison of man’s inventions to the functions and purposes of life. The clock makers’ analogy is one such argument. The clockmakers analogy imagines that you are taking a walk through the woods. You stumble upon a clock. Immediately you wonder, “where did this clock come from?” You might consider that it naturally grew there just as the nearby trees and plants did; but more likely you would assume that someone had left it. Because of its form and function, you would reason that the...

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Paley's Design Argument Analysis

...William Paley’s takes on the design argument in an analogy form which in its most basic form states if a watch is complex then it must have a maker if we compare to a human eye which is more complex then it proves that an intelligent creator thus exist. His argument is logically persuasive thought Natural theology. As for David Hume’s, “Dialogues concerning Natural Religion,” contra argument he finds various flaws in Paley’s argument.(need to explain) What I established after reading these two arguments is that it is difficult to come to a conclusion about the existence of god. Paley’s and Hume’s arguments are both inductive arguments discussing the existence of an intelligent creator, god, a topic that can never be proven to be true and absolute....

Words: 2351 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Paley's Design Argument Analysis

...Throughout history, the topic of whether an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient being, known as God, truly exits in our world or not is constantly debated between mainly two types of beliefs: atheism and theism. Obvious to every individual, “God” cannot be seen, heard, or touched. Scientifically, there is no concrete proof of God’s existence. Simply, an atheist would assert that God does not exist due to scientific reasoning and logic and Rowe’s argument from evil. However, a theist would refute the atheist’s argument with Paley’s design argument and Swinburne’s free will defense. Ultimately, what can truly be known about God’s existence? God’s Existence Versus Logic From an atheist’s perspective, there is no evidence supporting God’s...

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Design Argument Revision Notes

...The Argument for Design Background • Also known as teleological argument from Greek ‘telos’ meaning ‘goal or purpose’ • A posteriori – the DA claims there is evidence of design in the world and so relies on external empirical evidence for its proof. • Inductive argument. • Arguments for design go back at least as far as the Greek philosopher Plato [428-347 B.C.] • Some distinguish between ‘qua regularity’ and ‘qua purpose’, meaning that some DA’s argue on the basis of there being regularity in the Universe whilst others claim there is evidence of the Universe being designed for a purpose. • Three main types of argument are: From order [regularity] From beauty Anthropic [purpose] William Paley [1743-1805] in Natural Theology: Evidences of The Existence and Attributes of the Deity [1805] • Makes use of analogy and likens the complexity of a watch to the complexity of the Universe. Since a watch is clearly designed, so is the Universe [qua regularity]. Also, the human eye is too complex to have arisen by chance so must be designed for some purpose [qua purpose] • Hume [1711-1776] in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding put forward a number of criticisms of the DA before Paley published his work: • Design and order could be the result of chance [the Epicurean hypothesis] • Hume believed the analogy on which the DA is based is unsound...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Paley's Criticisms Of The Design Argument

...The design argument, also known as the teleological argument, in its simplest form could be defined as an ideology that argues that all this order and complexity that exists in this world has a creator or a intelligent being with a ‘rational mind’ behind it, without whom none of this would be possible. This creator is thought to be God. As I mentioned earlier, this argument is also known as the teleological argument alluding to the greek word "telos," which translates to “goal” or “purpose. (IEP)” The way Paley sees it is that the universe in a way works similar to a watch in that it displays design and consistency. As long as card indicators are present such as complexity and function, there is a designer behind it; God. It’s quite evident...

Words: 671 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Part a: Explain and Illustrate Two Problems with the Argument from Design (15 Marks)

...teleological argument questions the strength of Paley’s watchmaker analogy (although it must be noted that Hume’s criticism came 23 years before Paley made his argument) by debating whether the universe and watches are actually alike. If the universe and watches were alike, then it would be supposed that the universe has a designers because as Hume says ‘like effects presuppose like causes.’ For instance, if I saw two chocolate Mars bars I would be able to assume that they had the same cause, i.e. the same starting ingredients. However, Hume rejected Paley’s use of analogy as the watch and the universe are not similar. This is because the watch is mechanical while the universe is organic. We can assume a house has an architect and a builder because a house is unnatural and cannot be produced by nature. The universe on the other hand is natural however (unlike the watch used in Paley’s analogy), so the universe and the watch are not ‘like effects’, with Hume saying the analogy would work just as well between the watch and a giant vegetable. Evidently, it would not be plausible to conclude that the vegetable was designed. People have seen watches being made, so it cannot be debated whether they are designed, but no one has seen a universe being constructed neither is it as evident of design as the watch. Because of this Paley’s is flawed and cannot infer a designer. Although the world appears designed, this does not mean that the best explanation for this appearance in design. Darwin’s...

Words: 424 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

‘We See Examples of Design Throughout the Natural World and Conclude That an Intelligent Designer Is Clearly Demonstrated.’ Assess Whether This Argument Succeeds.

...‘We see examples of design throughout the natural world and conclude that an intelligent designer is clearly demonstrated.’ Assess whether this argument succeeds. The idea of an intelligent designer has split philosophers down the middle. Many different arguments are proposed by philosophers on each side as to why an Intelligent designer exists or doesn't exist. Arguments both from and for design present clearly that there is a god and we know this just by looking at objects around us. However it can be questionable that would an intelligent designer design diseases such as cancer , this rules out the possibility of an omnipotent designer. Examples of design are practically ever, from the printer that printed this work to the waterproofing of feathers on ducks. It is clear to us that a printer has been designed as it would be near impossible that it grew from a tree or just appeared. If I was to say a flying bee is more complex than a printer it would be hard to conceive. However the science or printers has been around for many years now and they are fairly easy to explain, but the flight of bee, a natural object, an insect, has only been understood in recent years. If a printer, which at face value seems more complex than a bee has been designed surely reason permits us to assume that a bee would have also been designed. You don't have to look very far to see evidence of design, a human eye provides a perfect example of design, it is made up of loads of tiny parts...

Words: 880 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Things

...110 Heter Lecture Two: The Argument from Design by Paley [1] Overview. William Paley argued that the universe is so complex that it must have been designed by a higher power. Paley compares the natural universe to a watch. The complexity of the watch proves that it must have been designed. Such a meticulous machine could not have arise by chance. Since the natural universe is far more complex than a watch (think of a human heart), the natural universe must have a designer that is very powerful. This designer must be all powerful; thus the designer must be God. Paley’s argument has been revived in the past five years under the name of “Intelligent Design.” The Intelligent Design Argument is exactly the same as Paley’s argument, with only one exception. The Intelligent Design Argument concludes that “a higher power of some sort, that we might call an ‘intelligent designer’ must exist.” But the argument does not call the ‘intelligent designer’ God. [2] Note on terms: “Teleological.” The Argument from Design has two different names. The argument is also called the “Teleological Argument.” The word “teleological” comes from the Greek word “telos” which means “end” or “purpose.” Paley believes that the universe has a purpose (telos) just like a watch has a purpose (to tell time). For example, the purpose of a human heart is to pump blood. [3] The Argument from Design Premise 1.If an object has a design then it must have a designer. (A watch...

Words: 1056 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Explain Why Some Philosophers Argue That Evidence of Design in the Universe Proves the Existence of God.

...The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. Telos means goal, aim or purpose. The argument looks at the idea of purpose and order within the universe to argue for the existence of God. The argument is an a posteriori, inductive, synthetic argument. A posteriori arguments have statements that rely on proof from the external evidence. In inductive arguments the argument is only brought in at the conclusion. Aquinas's 5th way in the cosmological argument as it argues for the existence of God, with regards to the evidence of purpose in nature. Aquinas stated that everything works together in a particular order despite the fact that inanimate objects have no mind or rational powers to achieve this. He explained his point by using the example of an arrow, saying that for an arrow to reach its destination it must be directed first of all by the archer. In the same way ‘natural bodies’ seem to act in a regular fashion to reach a specific purpose. As they, like the arrow, are not able to direct themselves, there must be a first cause. This first cause is what Aquinas considered to be God. Another philosopher that postulated a teleological argument is Paley. Paley put forward his argument for the existence of God during the period of enlightenment (where science was being used to prove evolution). Paley explained his theory using an analogy of the watch, but drawing comparisons between features of the watch and of the universe. He stated that if a man was walking...

Words: 1178 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

William Paley Existence Summary

...SUMMARY OF PALEY’S EVIDENCES OF THE EXISTENCE Joseph K. Olumullah Ivy Tech Community College PHIL 220-obh-h1-201420 Instructor: Jeff Dodge 09/29/2014   SUMMARY William Paley was born in England in 1743-1805 and was a trained Anglican priest. William wrote several books on both Christianity and philosophy. One of the notable books that he wrote was teleological argument for the existence of God. His argument has gone some changes in the past years, the latest being christened “intelligent design”. This argument is the same as design argument and the only difference being that latter concludes that there is higher power that is called an “intelligent designer while the previous doesn’t called it “intelligent designer. Paley argues that...

Words: 623 - Pages: 3