...opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to research through animal testing. The opinions vary and the passion runs deep. Both sides have extremely intelligent people, such as doctors and scientists, that argue vehemently for their opinion. While both sides present equally convincing arguments, there are downsides to each and a compromise must be reached. Many people, such as Dr. Andre Menache, who has campaigned against animal testing for over thirty years, would argue that animal testing is cruel and simply not worth it. According to Menache, “if we rely on animals to predict human response, we will get the right answer only 33% of the time. This figure is based on the correlation between preclinical...
Words: 628 - Pages: 3
...through the animal testing done in laboratories with the purpose of ensuring a drug’s effectiveness for humans. Though many may argue that animals fully merit their own rights to not be tested on, it is not taken into account how often animals are the best option for bringing revolutionary discoveries, since the help testing for drug safety and providing accurate biological feedback for the development of medicine. Furthermore, it is through the information presented that a...
Words: 1207 - Pages: 5
...* 1) Animal testing is not the same as human testing : Animal testing and human testing have different effects and results. The reaction of a drug in an animal’s body is quite different from the reaction in a human. * 2) Drug testing on animals causes stress, pain and sometimes death: Animal testing is cruel and sometimes it doesn’t even work. Some of the animals are not even properly anesthetized so, they feel sharp pains and usually die. One example of animal testing is called the Draize test in which the product tested is placed in the animal’s eyes resulting in blindness and death. Another example of animal testing is the LD50 in which huge amounts of a product are put into the animals’ stomachs until they die. In this process they suffer from vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion and internal bleeding. * 3) Animal testing is morally wrong: Besides producing suffering and pain, animals being tested generate high levels of depression because of being inside of small cages. It’s a proven fact that most scientists that do animal testing feel guilt and sorrow although they should not become emotionally connected with the animals. * 4) Animal testing is very expensive: Animal testing costs over $136 billion dollars annually for the American public. Animals must be fed, housed, cared and treated with drugs. The tests are very expensive and they may be practiced more than once in short periods of time. * 5) There are many alternatives for animal testing...
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...Are animals really people too? Do they get married? Are they considered responsible for their actions? We give them names and human personalities on to them but we eat them. We domesticated and breed them for consumption and work tasks. We have used animals as tools for thousands years. All major civilizations use animals to eat or work or both. Animal rights activists will say that we do not need animal testing but we do. A large majority of scientists believe that animal testing is still the gateway to most scientific and medical advancements. Using animals for testing is necessary and reasonable for the advancement of science and medicine. Animal testing has led to many scientific and life-saving advances. That includes the creation of the vaccines of small pox and...
Words: 1921 - Pages: 8
...Every year, over 25 million animals are used to conduct experiments for scientific and commercial research. Testing on animals have developed safe products for human use, which includes medical treatment, medicine, cosmetic, and skin care. Experimenting on them has enabled us to advance our approach to creating and innovating commercial and scientific products. People forget that the animals also benefit from these experiments. Others argue that it is inhumane and now that we have alternative options due to today’s technology, we should not be using animals anymore. Machines can replace the use of animals as well as prevent mistreatment of them. Opponents also claim that animals are different from humans which makes results irrelevant and therefore people...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...Cheyenne Lozano Ms. Hopper EH10, R1 10 Mar. 2016 Animal Testing Many people think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Others think that it’s necessary in the medical field and will help advance medicine. It has helped with many medical discoveries, but it does have it’s flaws and hiccups that undermine it’s overall value. Though it still has some strong points, animal testing should be limited because animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing, animal testing doesn’t produce accurate results, and there are many other reliable alternatives to it. Animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing. The human body is extremely complex. Humans differ from animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically...
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...A very touchy subject on whether or not animals should be tested on. More than 100 million animals are killed from testing in the U.S alone. That’s about 273.973 animals a day that die from getting tested for biological,medical, and cosmetic reasons. But why is this a thing, perhaps humans wouldn’t want anything bad happening to them and only to an innocent animal. Just think of your animals at home, they are scared going to the vet, let alone in a cage their whole life and getting nothing but tests. There are many reasons as to why this vicious act should be stopped immediately. You’re hurting an animal. That should be enough reasoning to stop. What gives you the right to test on confused scared animals. Some people believe...
Words: 477 - Pages: 2
...Animal testing is using animals in experiments for educational, commercial or for the purpose of research. For centuries, animal testing have been used in scientific and medical research. Each individual look upon animals in a different way; some consider animals as their mates while others consider animals to be their subordinates which can be used for their own good. Numerous medical research centers use a variety of animals as testing subjects. During animal experimentations, some animals are experimented on to check the reliability of some medication while others are used to gather information about human behaviors in specific conditions. It is also used in testing of medications, medical strategies, consumer products and military weapons....
Words: 590 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing research paper Throughout history animals have been unfairly tested on. As early as 384 Bc animal testing has occurred (Hajar). In 1980 Henry Spira, an animal rights activist, took an ad out in the New York Times with the slogan “How many rabbits does Revlon blind for beauty's sake?” That is what started the campaign to stop animal testing. Animals are tested on to make products such as shampoo, makeup, and sunscreen. When you test on animals 50% of the animals that get tested die during the study. The ones who survive are later killed. The main animals that are tested on are monkeys, rats, mice, lizards, guinea pigs and baboons but are not limited to those animals. Animal testing should be banned because it is unnecessary and cruel to animals. Different procedures are done to animals that are painful and would be considered animal abuse in any other situation. To test products and chemicals on animals there are many procedures that are done. One procedure is vivisection, which is the act of cutting or experimenting with live animals or putting harsh chemicals on the animals. Another procedure that is done is a Draize test. A Draize test involves dripping substances in rabbit or other animals eyes causing pain and in serious cases blindness. These procedures should be stopped because it is hurting live creatures and is cruel to...
Words: 561 - Pages: 3
...Dogs, cats, mice, and other small rodents risk their lives around the world in order to help us. Taking small animals and holding them down while injecting chemical substances into their eyes and body is humane? Animals have no say in what we can do to them. The animals go through severe suffrage for our needs. There are many negative outcomes of animal testing, but there are alternatives we could be using instead of living creatures. Animals should not be used for the testing of products. What is animal testing? Animal testing is the testing in which humans practice medical procedures on animals. Cosmetics and bath products are usually tested on the animals, and are the most common tests. These experiments can lead to death, and severe injuries....
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...ability of a test substance to irritate or damage the eye. This kind of needless torture happens hundreds of times every day as scientists don’t even care if the animal is suffering. Animal testing should be banned because we don’t need the next eyeliner and we have a different body system than animals. Claim: My claim is that we should not do animal testing. First Argument: The first reason why is that they kill animals just to have the next medicine,soap, and food ingredient. My first piece of evidence: Right now there are millions of animals such as dogs, cats, rats, mice, and primates getting tortured just to get the next product of eyeliner. In a recent article by PETA they said that “More than 100 million animals every year suffer and die in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests”(PETA), just to see if the products work. There are some countries such as Europe are getting away from buying products that were animal tested. China is different, they are continuing to sell animal cosmetics. What are cosmetics? A product applied to the body, especially the face, to improve its appearance. In 2014 “China spent 26.3 billion dollars, just on cosmetics”(Jeanne Kim). This proves that people should not kill animals just to get the next resource. The second piece of evidence: Animals are suffering mentally and physically in the facilities where they are getting treated. In the “United States there are over 1,100 facilities” where dogs, cats...
Words: 828 - Pages: 4
...and injure animals in the process of testing products? There tends to be three sides taken amongst this argument. Side one involves people that believe that an animal life does not compare to that of a human life and therefore it causes no problem to test any product we may have on animals if it benefits the consumer, side two which consists of the opposing argument to this, consists of the people who are against animal testing and believe that it is cruel and unjust and no matter the situation cannot be justified. Finally the third argument is the middle ground which embodies both points from the for and against argument of animal testing, they say that animal testing is cruel however sometimes it can be justified if the pros out way the cons such as in medical product development. Animal testing has and will always be a hotly debated topic one reason for this is because of the money it brings to the economy. “Animal research is a multibillion-dollar industry. Much money can be made by researchers and their institutions, those that supply animals and equipment for experiments, and companies that sell products tested on animals.”( Yarri, Donna, 2005) It is unlikely that the people involved in animal testing are going to want to use more costly methods of experimentation because of the “rights” of animals and therefore will argue the point that animal research is justified. Another point that may be argued by them is that if they have to find new means of testing this may reduce...
Words: 637 - Pages: 3
...Scientists putting animals through suffrage through medical research, but in any case, it is not contested, but on a scale it often is. There is an up and downstream of whether animal experimentation is a part of good science and also result in medical breakthroughs for humans. Depending on whether the progress may have achieved by any means. Millions of animals each year in the United States are experimented on for testing to help find cures and medicine for sick people/patients. Toxicity of medicine is put into animals and take the risk of whether or not are tests are successful or not so we can research further more. Research is led into saving lives, but what about the ones that are tested for hours on end and spend days in cages without...
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
...¬¬¬Animal testing is always on the debate through the past century with the rapid development of technology and medication industry. Animals are used in generally three purposes Biomedical and behavior research, Education, and Drug and product testing. With the development of these industries, animal testing becomes a hot topic. On one side, people tries to protect animals since they think all the organisms are equal. On the other side however, scientist and some anthropologists who stand on human’s perspective point out that all the efforts we have paid to try to be nice to animals are just because we are humans and we are the dominant force on this earth. The better position should be --- we as humans should protect animals since they live on the same planet as we do, but the first priority of all the creatures are to survive which is very cruel but very true. Therefore, humans have the right to make their lives better by conducting a certain level of animal testing. Animal testing is essential for human beings to cure their diseases. The record of animal would be traced back to at least 2000 years ago with the first record made in the third century B.C. In Egypt, philosopher and scientist Erisistratus used animals to study body functions. About five centuries later, the roman physician Galen proved that theory by conducting an animal test and finally uncovered the mask of body function (Research Animals, History, n.d). According to the FBR, (Foundation for Biomedical Research)...
Words: 1088 - Pages: 5
...Animal testing is use of animals in experimental ways for the benefit of biomedical research, and it has been a topic long argued about. To every argument, there are two sides: The American Medical Association (AMA) and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Humans (PETA). AMA’s opinion on the topic states that animal testing is necessary, while PETA highly discriminates it. These two major groups of people have been “at war” with each other on this topic of animal testing in biomedical research for decades. The AMA has recently published an article on this topic titled “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research.” AMA’s argument in this article is effective, they use persuasive techniques to support their claim, and their evidence is clear; however, the author fails to make some of his counterarguments convincing. AMA’s claim convinces you that animal testing is needed for biomedical research in many different, but persuasive ways. For example, they express that without all of the information gathered from animal testing, either man kind will be tested on, or we wouldn’t have the health benefits and treatments for diseases that we have today. In this statement, the author uses appeal to fear, by stating that humans everywhere will pay the price in terms of human pain and suffering, thus increasing fear and prejudice towards the audience. Another way the author uses persuasive techniques to support the claim, is by saying that there are limitations to the use of human subjects such...
Words: 670 - Pages: 3
