Free Essay

Anti Trust and the Consumer

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tiki07
Words 3108
Pages 13
Anti-Trust Laws and the Consumer
Anti-trust laws protect the consumer from unfair and deceptive trade practices. These laws were created to protect business owners, consumers and economic efficiency. In an open and free market, businesses must provide quality products and services to consumers as well as truthful representation of their goods and services. Misrepresentation results in inferior products and artificially inflated prices for the consumer and is at times accomplished through unlawful collusion between competitors. A fair and open market where businesses compete in a non-monopolistic environment brings economic efficiency as businesses are encouraged to find more efficient methods of production stay in the market. Inefficient firms that fail to understand consumer needs, eventually lose in the market. If open market competition was nonexistent, cartels and monopolies would be free to distort the allocation of society’s resources for economic profit in the long run. This would result in economic loss to consumers as well as competitive harm to the economy.
In the United States, the basic federal antitrust laws are: The Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act (1914) and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. The Sherman Act prohibits the restraint of trade and the creation of monopolies and is an important part of economic legislation in the United States. The Sherman Act prohibits any agreement among competitors to fix prices, rig bids or engage in other competitive activity. Corporations or individuals in violation of the Sherman Act face large fines and/or imprisonment and must make restitution to the consumers for overcharges. The Clayton Act of 1914 is a supplement to the Sherman Anti-trust act. It deals with specific types of restraints including exclusive arrangements, tie-in sales, price discrimination and mergers and acquisitions. These restraints protect against monopolistic takeovers. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 was created to support loopholes in the Clayton Act and is a “catch all” for all antitrust laws. The Federal Trade Commission Act has national and international jurisdiction in prohibiting unfair trade and competition practices.
Antitrust laws protect the consumer at both the state and federal level. These laws do not restrict or prosecute all joint agreements between companies, such as joint research and development. They govern companies that raise consumer prices through forms of collusive pricing and low output of supply. Horizontal price fixing, bid rigging and allocation schemes are considered the most common forms of antitrust collustions. Firms that agree to sell at a fixed price or agree to not bid against each other defraud their customers into thinking they are competitive. These types of non-compete agreements are usually covert and illegal.
Horizontal price fixing is agreed upon between competitors through a policy that is committal between players. When prices are artificially set, the free market is unable to fundamentally drive price levels, creating economic inefficiency. If output is reduced and prices are raised, the intent to create a monopoly is in question. It brings harm to the consumer and to economic efficiency through affected prices, profit margins, discounts and wages. In bid rigging, competitors agree on who will submit the winning bid before the bid process begins. Common forms of bid rigging are bid suppression, complementary bidding and bid rotation. Bid rigging usually happens among government agencies soliciting competitive bids. The dairy industry has faced prosecution in conspiracy to rig bids on milk products sold to public schools and other public institutions. Students and taxpayers who subsidized public school meals overpaid for milk while the dairy industry made excessive profits on artificially inflated milk products. Allocation schemes are when competitors agree to divide markets among themselves. Competitors will agree to allocate customers or geographic areas amongst themselves and will purposely quote high prices to customers outside their allocated area to forfeit business.
While price fixing, bid rigging and market allocation are the obvious violations of antitrust, there are more complex forms of antitrust violations. As antitrust violations become more complex, illegal per se is no longer a common ruling of the court in antitrust violations. Illegal per se is solely an interpretation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and it is no longer believed to bring accurate judgment in modern day cases and rulings. To combat the need for new interpretation, the US Supreme Court developed a doctrine called the rule of reason. The rule of reason gives lead way in the interpretation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. This flexible approach is meant to bring economic efficiency and preserve the business opportunities of individuals. Examples of modern day antitrust behaviors in question are resale price maintenance, bundled discounts, predatory pricing in the consumer oil market and online behavioral advertising.
Resale price maintenance (RPM) is when a manufacturer influences its retailers to resell a product at the same price and thereby prevents competition. RPM can be in the form of maximum or minimum resale price maintenance. Maximum resale price maintenance is when the manufacturer sets a cap on its distributors markup price. If maximum RPM is set too high, consumers are disadvantaged by high prices allowed by the manufacturer. If maximum RPM is set too low, distributors are disadvantaged because they cannot raise their prices high enough to make a profit. Minimum resale price maintenance is also known as vertical price fixing. Vertical price fixing agreements are between buyers and sellers who operate at different levels of a manufacturer’s retail distribution chain. This is different from horizontal price fixing which is agreements between competitors at the same level of distribution.
With minimum RPM, the manufacturer sets the minimum price of its downstream distributors or retailers. The manufacturer monitors their price setting requirements and can terminate downstream distributors for breach of pricing agreement if their good(s) are sold below the minimum price set. Before 1997, the courts ruled minimum RPM antitrust cases as illegal per se under the case ruling of Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Parke & Sons Co, 1911. In 1997, this case was overruled in Leegin Creative Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
Leegin manufactures and distributes leather goods and accessories under the name of Brighton. The manufacturer implemented an RPM and terminated retailers who sold their goods below their minimum RPM. Leegin also sold only to specialty stores that could offer better service and support of their product. PSKS was caught discounting the Brighton line below the minimum RPM. When asked to stop, PSKS sued Leegin in violation of the Sherman Act with interpretation of the Dr. Miles case. Leegin won when the Supreme Court overruled Dr. Miles and stated that minimum RPM does not fall under horizontal price fixing and market division since it does not restrict competition and/or output. This became a turning point in the interpretation of minimum RPM.
One of the benefits of minimum RPM is the inability to free ride. Free riding is when consumers purchase quality products at a lesser price minus product service and support. An example of free riding is a consumer views a product at a trade show or specialty shop from a distributor that offers full service and support of downstream product(s). The consumer then purchases the product over the internet without service or support at a price below the full service distributor’s retail price. This kind of competition discourages full-service retailers because of the inability to recoup the additional expense of showcasing and professional support of product lines. In addition, the manufacturer also loses sales due to the competitive disadvantage of their downstream distributors.
A harmful effect of minimum RPMs is when price fixing and exclusion of competitors is combined. Collusion is agreed upon by either competing manufacturers or between retailers who together place pressure on the manufacturer to change the RPM. One harmful example is when a retailer can raise prices due to an increase in minimum RPM and the retailer does not provide retail space for a competing manufacturer. The retailer sells the product with the higher profit margin through exclusionary practices. This also places the consumer at a disadvantage since substitute products are limited or unavailable. While there are benefits and harms to RPM, the economic incentive of RPM is to prevent intra-brand competition between distributors.
The next modern day antitrust behavior in question is discount bundling and bundle tying. This is when a seller offers two or more products at a discount when purchased together. One product is the “tying good” and the conditional purchase product(s) are the “tied good.” This could be a 20% discount on product A when purchasing product B. A discounted bundle could stipulate a market share (quantity) purchase or a required multiple product purchase. Bundled discounts and tying are omnipresent in the marketplace and basically considered efficient. Bundling can be simple or complex as well as, contractual or non-contractual. One common form of complex bundling allows the customer to determine the portions of various goods to purchase at a bundled discount. This is generally offered to Group Purchasing Organizations and large commercial contracts such as medical brokers. For the most part, discount bundling is competitively harmless and non-monopolistic. There are theories however, that question particular its characteristics and antitrust violation.
The positive economic reasons for bundled discounts are considered efficient, profitable and beneficial to buyers and sellers. Some items are manufactured as a bundle to lower transactions costs or protect product quality. A complete package such as a car, eliminates the need for the consumer to purchase the shell of a car and add their own seats, tires, etc. to finish the product. Lowering the transaction costs of doing business is savings passed down to the consumer.
Product quality protection is when bundled product A and B are complementary. Product quality may diminish in product A if the consumer purchases an inferior product B, when product B is needed to operate product A. Giving the consumer monetary incentive to purchase a tied bundle of complement products mitigates customer dissatisfaction and preserves brand quality. An example is printers and ink cartridges and a business example is when a franchise restricts its franchisees to their suppliers in order to preserve consumer quality. For the two reasons explained, tying maintains competition and is non-monopolistic.
The most common issues for antitrust violations in tie bundling is leveraging, predatory pricing and exclusionary conduct. Leveraging is when a manufacturer outputs a Product A with high market demand and ties with a product B that pushes out competitors. This happened in 1987 when Kodak tied the sale of their copiers with service contracts restricting part replacements to buyers who only serviced their copiers internally or through Kodak. It formed a service monopoly for Kodak and pushed out independent service companies.
An exclusionary example of bundling is when competitors who manufacturer a subset of another competitor’s bundled products are subject to being pushed out of the market because of profit margins. For example, if manufacturer 1 creates a bundled discount that consists of product A and B and manufacturer 2 only produces product A at the same price, manufacturer 2 must sell below the competitor’s amortized bundled discount price of product A to stay competitive. Manufacturer 2 lowers prices to compete and forfeits profit margin. Manufacturer 1’s ability to sell at the lowest price and profit, pushes out the competitor with the limited product line. Eliminating rivals in the market allows bundled discount competitors to gain market share and predatory pricing works against efficient competitors and can lead to monopolies. Predatory bundles are always exclusionary but exclusionary bundles are rarely predatory. While bundled pricing offers a savings to the consumer in the short run, it could lead to higher prices in the long run if product competition is eliminated.
Consumer oil prices are a third modern antitrust behavior in which interpretation is evolving with government and consumer protection agencies. There is much debate and speculation over volatility in gas prices. Oil companies argue that gas prices are reflective of crude oil prices and the adjustment of supply and demand; however, consumers and politicians contribute high gas prices to oil companies exploiting their market power.
The oil industry is considered an oligopoly to some because of minimal competitors and the speculated existence of cartels. It was deregulated in 1981 and at times come under scrutiny for showing large economic profits that coincide with high consumer prices and restricted output. Some speculations of exploitation are market manipulation of data and price projection; oil companies falsifying information on prices and inventory and price fixing conspiracies between oil companies. In Texaco v. Dagher, 2006 Texaco and Shell gas stations owners filed a class action suit against Equilon for setting a set single price for both brands. Plaintiffs also charged Equilon with collusion and horizontal price fixing. Equilon was found not guilty on all charges of antitrust violations of the Sherman Act.
In 2008, oil prices surged as heavy speculators purchased crude oil in the futures market. This is thought to be a contributing factors to the price increase for consumer oil. As more oil investors entered the futures market, the value of the dollar dropped and oil prices rose creating an inconsistency with market demand and price. Moreover, the CFTC is currently investigating alleged short-term manipulation of crude-oil prices that were allegedly read by an industry-used price-reporting system...There is also concern of the timing of energy companies and traders entering the market. While there is no absolute proof of market manipulation at this time, lawmakers and regulators are currently working to enforce regulations to ensure that speculative investors do not create oil market volatility at the expense of the consumer.
The final antitrust behavior to be discussed in this paper is online behavioral advertising. Online behavioral advertising is the practice of tracking an individual’s internet activity in order to deliver advertising tailored to his/her interests. While there are benefits to tailored free online advertising, consumer privacy is a concern that includes the hidden method of data collection and the risk of collecting sensitive data from an individual’s computers. Data is collected invisibly through “cookies” or small text files placed on a computer’s web browser. The cookie transmits data back to the website’s server on the browsing activity of the individual’s computer. This brings concern that the security of the data collected could be fraudulently compromised, especially information regarding finances, health and children. While there are laws in place related to data protection, the FTC also has 4 governing principles. They are (1) transparency and control; (2) reasonable security and limited data retention; (3) material changes to privacy policies (consent of the consumer if material changes) and (4) companies must obtain a consumer’s consent before using sensitive data. Companies that have recently addressed these principles are Google and Yahoo. They offer opt-outs on their toolbar for online tracking and privacy controls. Microsoft has released a new web browser version that will allow the user to clear the browser’s cache at the end of each internet session. Educational programs are also being developed to inform the consumer of online data collection. While online behavioral advertising has the right to operate freely in a competitive market, FTC practices will continue to evolve as they examine the marketplace and work towards protecting the consumer .
In conclusion, the United States’ founding antitrust laws were written to protect both the consumer and the individual business owner. As times have changed, so have the complexities of how businesses operate in today’s free and open marketplace. The courts no longer rule solely on illegal pre se for antitrust violations as they have learned to interpret the law bearing rules of reason on a case by case basis. When the competitive system is operating effectively it brings economic efficiency and is Pareto-efficient. Bibilography

Richard M. Steuer of Mayer Brown, LLP, “Executive Summary of The Antitrust Laws”,

“Antitrust Enforcement and the Consumer”, US Department of Justice, http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/misc/antitrust/antitrus.htm

"Price Fixing & Bid Rigging - They Happen: What They Are and What to Look For." Antitrust Primer for Procurement Professionals 1-3. Web. 14 Nov 2009. .

Graglia, Lino A. "Symposium: A Continuing Symposium on Antitrust and the Roberts Court:
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.: The Strange Career of the Law of Resale
Price Maintenance." Antitrust Bulletin 53.3 (2008): 803-847. EconLit. EBSCO. Web. 14 Nov.
2009.

Boyle, Peter M., and Sean M. Green. "Will Another Per Se Rule Fall?" Legal Times Vol XXX, No. 12 (2007): 1-2.

Shaffer, Greg. "Slotting Allowances and Resale Price Maintenance: A Comparison of Facilitating Practices. " The Rand Journal of Economics 22.1 (1991): 120-135. ABI/INFORM Global, ProQuest. Web. 14 Nov. 2009.

Hovenkamp, Herbert and Hovenkamp, Erik, “Complex Bundled Discounts and Antitrust Policy”, Antitrust Bulletin, pg 1-25(Feb. 2009)

“The current state of the law and economics of tie-in sales and the implications for the business manager." Graziadio Business Report 11.2 (2008): n. pag. Web. 13 Nov 2009.
.

Elhauge, Einer "How Loyalty Discounts Can Perversely Discourage Discounting." Journal of Competition Law and Economics 5.2 (2009): 189-231. EconLit. EBSCO. Web. 12 Nov. 2009.

Flint, P.. (2009, September). Rising oil prices? It's elementary! Air Transport World, 46(9), 22. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1861782081).

Zachary A Goldfarb. (2009, July 29). Oil Speculation Limits Weighed; Regulator Scrutinizes Financial Firms' Sway Over Prices. The Washington Post,p. A.13. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from Washington Post. (Document ID: 1807757051).

Durrance, C.. "Collaborations among competitors: Texaco Inc. v. Dagher. " Antitrust Bulletin 53.1 (2008): 35-49. ABI/INFORM Global, ProQuest. Web. 14 Nov. 2009.

Balke, Nathan S., Stephen P. A. Brown, and Mine K. Yucel "Crude Oil and Gasoline Prices:
An Asymmetric Relationship?." Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review (1998): 2-11.
EconLit. EBSCO. Web. 14 Nov. 2009.

Sticky prices, inventories and market power in wholesale gasoline markets, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol 33, No. 1, Spring 2002, pp. 116-139 "Oil: It's Back to Supply and Demand." Business Week, Feb. 5, 2007: n. pag. Web. 13 Nov 2009. .

Oil prices, demand out of sync, CEO says, Business, Chron.com – Houston Chronicle

"Finance And Economics: Data drilling; Speculators and the oil price. " The Economist 12 Sep. 2009: ABI/INFORM Global, ProQuest. Web. 14 Nov. 2009.

U.S. oil probe focusing on price manipulation, May 30, 2008, Reuters.com

“FTC Staff Report: Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising” Behavioral Advertising, Tracking, Targeting & Technology, Feb. 2009

FTC Staff Revises Online Behavioral Advertising Principles, Feb. 12, 2009

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Anti Trust Policy in the Modern Economy: Microsoft Anti-Trust Case

...Anti-trust Policy in the Modern Economy Microsoft's Anti-trust Case Mark Hinman UCCS Baud 5590 Anti-trust Policy in the Modern Economy Microsoft's Anti-trust Case This paper's intention is to discuss the role of anti-trust legislation in the modern economy. To accomplish this, we will be reviewing the United States Government's anti-trust case against Microsoft that began nearly twenty-two years ago. To begin we will look at the history leading up to the filing, the government's argument, Microsoft's argument, and the outcome of the case. We will also look at the intent of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Specifically, how does the Sherman Anti-Trust Act protect consumers? Finally, we will discuss whether the anti-trust legislation actually accomplishes what it is intended to do, with respect to the technology industry. Microsoft has been under constant scrutiny since June 1990 when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a probe into the possible collusion between Microsoft and IBM. Three years later, the FTC handed over their investigation to the U.S. Department of Justice. After years of accusations for monopolizing and engaging in anti-competitive acts, Microsoft finally, on May 18, 1998, received a suit for violation of federal anti-trust laws.[i] The suit alleges that Microsoft is in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and seeks to prohibit Microsoft from selling certain products and engaging in certain sales...

Words: 2315 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Business Laws....Effective or Not?

...place such as the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act. Anti-Trust laws limit what businesses can and cannot do to ensure that all competitors have an equal chance of succeeding. (Bovee and Thill p. 39). We will discuss each of these laws throughout the paper and hopefully answer the question that was originally asked. The United States laws that are in place currently are typical effective as control measures to ensure fair business practices are followed. Determining the success or failure of specific legislation or regulations can be relative to what angle you are looking from. With anti-trust laws we are insured safeness from unreasonable trade, price discrimination and unfair and anti-competitive business practices. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act In 1890, Congress enacted the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which is a law designed to restore competition and free enterprise by breaking up monopolies. The Act of July 2, 1890 (Sherman Anti-Trust Act) states that: “This Act outlaws all contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that unreasonably restrain interstate and foreign trade. This includes agreements among competitors to fix prices, rig bids, and allocate customers, which are punishable as criminal felonies.” (The Act of July 2, 1890 pg. 1) The original intention of the Sherman Antitrust Act was to protect consumers from big businesses that were using unscrupulous means to raise...

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Anti-Trust Laws

...rules and regulations to govern fair and equitable trade and business practices. However, with competition came regulation for business and trade. A Competitive America As Americans we love to compete. Therefore it is no wonder that the United States economy is based on competition. Promoting competition is accepted as the best way to promote consumer well-being. America’s anti-trust laws have been in place for more than 100 years, since the Industrialization of America protecting the consumer’s rights. However, more countries have passed anti-trust laws in the past 20 years. America’s anti-trust laws were passed to focus on anti-competitive practices. Americans have long loved free market system and the competition that it fosters. Competition among businesses has been regulated by anti-trust acts recently; however they help to maintain a fair and equitable system where the small business is able to compete with the big business. The anti-trust laws enable the consumer to purchase a quality product at an affordable price due to the competitive market that it sets in place between the businesses. Anti-trust laws are needed to continually handle the companies that would be dishonest in business practices if not for regulations and rules....

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Regulation and Compliance

...HCS/430 - Legal Issues in Health Care: Regulation and Compliance February 28, 2011 William Bross Article/Case Law Search The main function of the anti trust law in health care is to help keep the industry competitive and open so that any means of delivery service that are new or any new financing of health care services are able to compete for the acceptance by any purchasers. By developing these arrangements helps the competition such as providers, insurers, and any others and this is important to help prevent the fixing of prices, and any other agreements that may be allocated among the competitors. By enforcing the anti trust laws federally has helped to facilitate the delivery of health care systems that is efficient and has helped to challenge any efforts of any anticompetitive providers in health care delivery. Anti trust laws are a body of laws that help to prohibit any anti competitive behavior and any business practices that are unfair. These laws are made to help encourage competition in the workplace. These anti trust laws make many practices illegal and they may hurt consumers and businesses and can violate ethical behavior standards. In order to prevent failure within the market there are regulators along with candidates that are private which helps to apply the anti trust laws. These anti trust laws are supposed to help produce prices that are low and also make services and good better. These laws continue to be a concern for hospitals, organizations...

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Anti Trust Laws

...competitors in similar businesses (Ftc Guide To Antitrust Laws, 2008). With the current health care debate issues concerning anti trust laws are also an issue for concern. A major facet of President Obama’s health care reform is for those within the health care community from providers to drug companies to commit on some level to keeping down cost. According to the New York Times, “Any agreement among competitors with regard to prices or price increases — even if they set a maximum — would raise legal concerns” (Pear, 2006) Anti-trust laws are imperative to keep the market competitive regardless of the type of business one runs. However, especially in terms of medical care it is important that issues, such as price gouging do not take place because of the large number of people who struggle with health care cost. Unfair business practices are always a point within business constantly under monitoring and creating changes because of said monitoring. Health care is essential to the everyday lives of the American people, from those who can afford to pay cash for their medical services to those who use public assistance, and everyone in between. If any area of business needs to stay abreast of issues concerning anti trust laws and monopoly health care is number one because of the domino effect health care can have on the economy (Jost, 2009). Another aspect of anti trust laws is the ability to keep the market competitive. In the instance of health...

Words: 1043 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Thesis Problem Statement

...Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Finance The United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation Topic: My Honors Program thesis project will deal with “The United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation.” In this ongoing anti-trust case, the Justice Department and 19 States Attorneys' General are alleging that the company is guilty of monopolistic and anti-competitive trade practices that are detrimental to industry competitors and consumers. Microsoft contends that it has fostered innovation and competition and has not engaged in monopolistic practices. Over the course of this project, I will examine the historical and current applications of anti-trust law and utilize these laws to develop an analysis of the Microsoft case. Rationale: The history of Anti-Trust litigation in the United States features several groundbreaking cases that have contributed to our current competitive environment. Without a doubt, the ongoing Microsoft anti-trust trial is the most relevant and challenging exercise of anti-trust law in decades. I find the Microsoft anti-trust case to be an outstanding thesis topic for a variety of reasons. As a future law school student, I am intrigued by the complex applications of anti- trust law and the existing jurisprudence with regard to such cases. Most experts would agree that recent developments involving computing technology and Internet products have helped fuel our nation's incredible economic performance over the last several...

Words: 528 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Is Genetically Modified Food Safe?

...Is Genetically Modified Food Safe? Shana Kritzer Lourdes University 23 April 2013 Is Genetically Modified Food Safe?   In the spring of 1998, a riot broke out, just outside of Norfolk, England. The cause was not labor disputes or race relations, but a crop of genetically modified food. What began as a peaceful demonstration of anti-genetic modification Greenpeace protesters evolved into a riotous crowd of about 150, who after trampling security guards, marched onto the field and began uprooting and destroying a plot of genetically modified (GM) corn. Protesters used bare hands, trimming shears, and a mowing machine to destroy over 4 acres of the 6 acre plot. Farm workers tried to drive protesters away with a mechanical digger and shovels, while the farm manager disabled the mowing machine by ramming it with his tractor, but the protesters continued to demolish the crop field. After fifteen minutes police arrived and managed to break up the riot. The protest led to 30 arrests and 26 injuries (6 police officers, 12 farm workers, 8 protesters) (“GM Protesters”). After 12 more incidents like this one, numerous raids and attacks on food stores and labs selling or producing genetically modified products, the controversy and upset in England has still not reached an end. Around the world the debate on genetically modified food continues.         Products containing genetically modified ingredients dominate the grocery shelves, with at least seventy-five percent of processed...

Words: 5994 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Rhectorical Analysis Essay

...The Anti-Nike Ad Nancy The Anti-Nike Ad In my opinion this is an anti-Nike ad, it is portraying Nike as a bad company. This ad is in black and white with some words colored in red. Looking at this ad I see a young girl running with no shoes on her feet and holding a blanket. I think there is a baby in that blanket by the way she is cradling it in her arms. The ad describes how hard the Indonesian people have to work for Nike to get their products out to the consumers. They also highlight the words in red how it’s so cool to wear Nike. I intend to analyze the ad according to its use of credibility (ethos), emotion (pathos), and intellect (logos). One of the ways this anti-Nike ad was able to get consumers to trust them was through its use of ethos. Nike is a very popular band that professional athletes use in sporting events. Since Nike is a popular brand there has been a lot of advertisements around that encourage people to try their product. However, this anti Nike ad is the most effective advertisement ever made because it shows negativity towards the Nike brand. Nike has been around for a long time so, when you see an ad that contradicts their brand you ask yourself if you want to support their product. In my opinion this ad is trying to get a reaction from Nike. Because Nike is so well known they can reach more readers and consumer to get their point of view to a broader audience. Another way this anti-Nike ad was able to get consumers to trust them was...

Words: 621 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Clayton Act

...Clayton Anti-trust Law In the late 1800’s there were some big names in the economy. Two of the biggest trusts out there where the Carnegie Steel and John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company. These two companies and a few others dominated the economy and controlled not only the prices, but the market share for their products. In response, the Sherman Anti-trust Act was passed around 1890 to limit the control. The Sherman Act however, did not cover everything that businesses needed it to cover. In 1914, Woodrow Wilson instructed Congress to pass a new set of antitrust laws called the Clayton Act. (Swenson, 2) The Sherman Act was first passed to ensure that no company “shall monopolize, attempt to monopolize or conspire with another to monopolize interstate or foreign trade or commerce, regardless of the type of business entity” (Abernathy, 4). If a company did violate this act they could face up to three years in jail and up to $350,000 per violation and corporations could be fined up to $10 million per violation (6). Although the Sherman Act provided much advancement in fighting monopolies, there needed to be another act that more specifically and clearly prohibited certain anti-competitive practices. Since the Sherman act needed more clarification, the Clayton Act of 1914 was soon drafted by Henry De Lamar Clayton Jr. Clayton along with many other people though the Sherman Act needed to be strengthened and clarified to work better. When Woodrow Wilson became president...

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Laws in the United States

...fair business practices. With anti-trust laws in place we are then warranted a since of security from unfair and anti-competitive business practices, unreasonable trade, and price discrimination. As though anything new that is introduced, laws and or regulations when newly introduced can become the product of skepticism. Typically the judgmental ears question the new laws purpose and what influence it will have, even though these new laws may be intended to foster fair and or competitive business practices. Although most of us do not recognize their value, anti-trust laws affect our daily lives in a multiplicity of ways. In 1890 Congress ordained the Sherman Antitrust Act, a law designed to restore competition and free enterprise by breaking up monopolies. This Act July 2. 1890 states the following: “This Act outlaws all contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that unreasonably restrain interstate and foreign trade. This includes agreements among competitors to fix prices, rig bids, and allocate customers, which are punishable as criminal felonies.” The novel purpose for Sherman’s Act was to protect consumers from big business that was exercising immoral means to raise the prices of their product falsely, for example producing too few goods to help meet the consumers needs thereby driving up the products value and price. The government has throughout the years introduced new laws to help protect both the trade industry and consumers. In 1914 Congress passed two more...

Words: 718 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Rhetoric of Cover Girl Advertisements

...featuring Ellen DeGeneres promoting a new anti-aging product. In the advertisements featuring Ellen, the advertisers at Cover Girl uses ethos, logos, and pathos in an attempt to convince women to buy their products. By identifying the ways in which Cover Girl’s new advertisements appeal to their audience, students of rhetoric can gain a more complete understanding of how advertisers employ rhetorical principles as tools of persuasion in order to motivate their audience to buy new products. Choosing Ellen DeGeneres as the new spokesperson for Cover Girl most overtly appeals to authority. Many women trust Ellen both because she maintains a level of respect both personally and professionally. On a personal level, Ellen presents herself as an average woman who happens to be funny. Cover Girl hopes that women will identify with Ellen because of her positive and prominent personal reputation. Furthermore, Ellen hosts a talk show that, among other things, establishes her as an honest and reliable source of information. Several American women watch Ellen’s talk show daily and trust her as an authoritative and reliable source of helpful information. For example, Ellen recently included a segment giving advice to her audience about how to save money on Valentine’s Day. Several women rely on Ellen for important consumer information. Therefore, when women see Ellen featured in a Cover Girl advertisement endorsing Cover Girl products, they trust the product to do what Cover Girl claims that...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Power Point

...………………………….………………….……………………...… page 4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….........page 5 References…………………………………………………………………….…....... page 6 Market Structure Introduction The purpose of this paper is to discuss and exam the two major types of market structures and how they affect the companies and their production along with the affect that consumers have on the companies and how the market is driven. We will discuss the affect that monopolies and oligopolies have on consumers as well and the part that the Government can play in how these companies are able to operate. Market Structure When studying an antitrust investigation I felt it necessary to first explain some things about market structure. The two types of market structure I will discuss are monopolies and oligopolies. A monopoly market structure is when a single company is the sole producer of a product and they can set the price for which it is sold. Usually there are no close alternatives to this product or service making it the only one available to the consumer and competition is not a problem for these companies due to the barriers that can prevent other competition from trying to enter that market. These barriers consist of economies of sale, legal barriers and patents, control over necessary resources, and pricing or other strategic business actions to prevent others from entering the market (McConnell, 2012). When we speak of monopolies there...

Words: 1173 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Geroski, Thinkig Creatively About Markets - Key Learning Note

...definition of market boundaries for the corporate strategists to take the right strategic and innovative decisons. He believes that all corporate strategists have specific needs that affect their vision of how the market should be delimited. The market definition has to be in line with those needs. At first, Geroski discusses two tradionnal visions of the market: “trading markets”, and “anti-trust markets”. “Trading markets” are defined as geographical areas, in which people deal with groups of homogeneous products that obey to the rule of one price. Geroski defines “anti-trust markets” as markets which are dominated by a firm or a group of firms, and where competitivness is serverly controlled. These two market visions seem to be correlated, but Geroski points out some inconsistencies: indeed, if, for example, there was some change in the degree of the market’s competitiveness, would an increase in prices be possible? As Geroski says, “some members of trading market may not be effective members of anti-trust market”… Thus the rule of one price is hardly applicable in presence of an “anti-trust market” in which firms might be able to exert monopoly power. As those traditionnal market definitions are not satisfactory, Geroski has thought of a third concept of market: A “strategic market”, in line with each company’s needs and goals. In this model, each firm shapes it’s own market, to respond to its strategic objectives and maximize its...

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

United States vs. Microsoft Corporation

...Introduction The Department of Justice investigated Microsoft Corporation for anti-trust behavior throughout the 1990’s. 19 States complained against Microsoft for practicing monopolistic behavior, following the investigation, the case went to trial. The following paper discusses the case against Microsoft, than talks about the monopoly market structure, and how it can affect society. United States of America V. Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Corporation, a multinational software corporation, was investigated for anti-trust behavior throughout the 1990’s. Complaints to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), sparked an investigation on Microsoft corporation for using market power to monopolize web browsing software, which may prevented competing web browsers to gain marginal revenue. (Kleiner, 2011) In 1990, the FTC started investigating the Microsoft Corporation for monopoly (Brown, 1993), though in 1993 the FTC could not reach a conclusion if Microsoft practiced anti-trust behavior and further dropped the case (Keho, 1993). In 1994, The Department of Justice (DOJ) reopened the case, which resulted in a settlement between the complainants, the DOJ and Microsoft Corporation (U.S. Department of Justice, 1995). In May of 1998, 19 state plaintiffs and the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, accusing the corporation for being a monopoly market structure by destroying competing threats posed to Microsoft. The company was accused for bundling their software to include with...

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

AT & T-Time Warner Merger

...about white collar crime and the media deal between the two telecommunication companies, this merger is a deal that could put the company at risk of committing white collar crimes. Both AT&T and Time Warner are already big corporations in the media industry, and their union will make even fewer titans. It will lead to a huge amount of power for AT&T and will be in violation of anti-trust laws set forth by the government itself. This deal is not in the public interest and federal regulators should scrutinize this deal and consider the effect it will have on smaller telecommunication businesses, consumers, and employees. Time Warner owns popular media companies such as CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros. Studios. AT&T is a major provider of telephone, internet and cable services across the nation. Both of these companies are incredibly large and prosperous on their own. Together, they would make the few number of companies that dominate the telecommunications market even smaller. This could have a negative effect on the free-market economy if they use this power to monopolize the market. This is exactly what Anti-trust laws were designed to prevent. The Clayton Act, an...

Words: 520 - Pages: 3