Premium Essay

Baron Case

In:

Submitted By pede22
Words 1128
Pages 5
Statistical Analysis
On February 18, 2006, Mrs. Kim requested that Baron Art Mart, Inc. compensate her for the permanent injuries inflicted on her by one of their employees while falsely imprisoning her on January 3, 2006. Since the injury left her with a permanent disability that wont allow her to work for the next ten years until her retirement, she is demanding compensation of $765,000 in medical expenses and $500,000 for her loss of future income. Mrs. Kim has provided us with her yearly gross income from her sales position at a pharmaceutical company called Derk from the past fifteen years. I will use Mrs. Kim’s yearly gross income to determine her projected real income for the next ten years to see if her request for $500,000 for loss of future income is reasonable. In order to begin our analysis, we need to calculate Mrs. Kim’s real income. To find her real income from the past fifteen years, we first had to divide each price index divided by one hundred to obtain an adjusted price index. The price index, also known as inflation, is a weighted average that measures the price change over a period of time by comparing the prices of any year with the prices of its base year. By dividing each price index by one hundred, we are calculating the adjusted price index which is the percent of change in inflation in for each of those years. As you can see, the price indexes in Mrs. Kim’s attached document show that her gross income is increasing every year but also at an increasing rate. The price indexes were constructed by comparing the total cost of a fixed market basket of goods in one year by its base year. After we calculate the adjusted price index for each year, we divide Mrs. Kim’s yearly gross income by its adjusted price index to find out what her real income for each year was. The real income is the amount of income an individual receives for a year after

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Credit: Ftisland 4th Mini Album [Grown-Up] Title Song '지독하게 (Severely)' Mv Full Ver

...手表里的齿轮嘀嗒嘀嗒地响着。 我含泪望着敏仪的遗照。敏仪还这么年轻,为什么这么快离开人世?为什么别人遇到车祸,车子都快变成西饼了都没事,而敏仪只是被车子撞了一下就归天呢?为什么?为什么? 手表里的齿轮依旧嘀嗒嘀嗒地响着。 我不能再这么看着敏仪了,再这样下去我会疯掉。怀着这一颗伤心欲绝的心,我向教堂的大门走去。 不巧,才出大门不久,有一个人和我相撞。 “真倒霉,女朋友死了,现在连走出教堂而以就这么黑!”我在心里莫名的骂着。 正当我想把怒气发泄在那和我相撞的人时,我发现站在我面前的,居然是敏仪! 我猛地把敏仪抱入怀里。 “敏仪,谢天谢地,你……”话还没说完, 我就被怀里的女子推开了。 我被她推得跌坐在地上。她给了我一颗很奇怪的眼神,然后就走进教堂。 我顿时傻了。平时敏仪最爱腻在我的怀里,今天怎么……不行,我一定要查清楚! 于是,我悄悄地得跟着敏仪。 她祈祷完后,就去练舞了。 “这不就是敏仪演出的舞啊?奇怪,敏仪的演出不是已经过了吗?为什么她还要练呢?” 我随手从舞蹈室附近的书摊的架子拿起一份报纸看。突然间,我发现一件很奇怪的事。拿报纸的日期居然是2012年1月17日! “奇怪,今天不是2012年1月27吗?为什么……” 顿时,我的心里突然浮现了一个很疯狂的念头——时间倒流。 “难道,老天爷可怜我,想给我改变结局的机会?嗯,一定是这样!”想到这,我迈着轻快的步回家。 回家后,我开始会议敏仪从18号的点点滴滴。 18号那天,敏仪好像有跟我投诉说她昨晚过马路时险些被车撞。 “好,明天要去那交通灯等她!” 第二天,我来到了敏仪差点出车祸的地方。我记得这天我和敏仪在意大利餐馆吃晚餐。她想必是在回家时要过马路时差点被撞。稍微算了算时间,敏仪应该是9点到这里。 “好,我就在这附近的餐馆坐到9点!” 晚上9点。我走出餐馆看看现况。就在这时,我看到敏仪正要过马路,而与此同时,有一家跑车正在从向敏仪!我马上往敏仪的方向冲去一把抱住了敏仪。 幸好时间捉对了,我的敏仪没有受伤。 “你没事吧?” 敏仪给了我一个欣慰又好奇的微笑。随后,我送敏仪回家。 “喂,你不是说有事吗?怎么还有时间陪我回家?”敏仪问。 我尴尬的笑了笑。敏仪回了我一个甜甜的微笑就走进屋子了。 望着敏仪的背影,我欣慰的笑了笑。好了,第一天的劫过了。 19号。我和敏仪去吃早点。我记得,这天我因为看窗外的景色看得太入神了而忘记帮敏仪放糖。还有,我们去教堂祈祷时,突然下起雨来,把我们都弄湿了。 我马上把雨伞带在身边。 来到Tea House,如往常般,敏仪帮我叫了一壶咖啡。 我如往常般欣赏窗外的景色。只是现在,我特别留意了敏仪的动作。不久,咖啡到了,敏仪正在帮我倒到杯子里。 我连忙把糖放到他的杯子。 也许我的动作太快了,敏仪有一点吓倒。她惊奇的眼神使我觉得很尴尬。我连忙拿起我的咖啡来喝。咖啡一进入我的嘴里,我差点没把咖啡吐出来——我帮敏仪放糖了,可我的忘记放了!天哪,苦死了!!! “怎么样?无糖咖啡好喝吗?”敏仪带着一点戏虐的口气问道。 我尴尬的笑了笑。 吃完早点,我们去教堂祈祷。敏仪的演出快要到了,她紧张得天天来教堂祈祷,祈求演出不要出错。我就像上次那样陪她到教堂祈祷,这是这次,我带了把雨伞。 祈祷完后,我们走出教堂。 “今天大晴天,为什么带伞?”看到我倒着雨伞,敏仪好奇地问道。 我神秘的笑了笑。 ...

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Sources of Lords vs Commons

...Assess the arguments in favour of a largely or wholly elected second chamber. (25) Introduction: What is our second chamber? HoL – currently appointed for Life – briefly say how this developed: why are there life peerages, how do they work, who do they tend to be, how are they appointed? What happened to the hereditary peerages? What is currently proposed for the House of Lords? This article states what Labour’s proposal is, then assesses the strengths of an unelected house (as it is at the moment). Right, now you need to assess the arguments in favour of an elected (partly or wholly) House of Lords! It might make the House of Lords more representative! Explain why this is a good thing. Explain how the House of Lords composition is now (look it up). Then EVALUATE: Would it being an elected house actually make it more ‘representative’? Composition of House of Commons is still rather unrepresentative, despite being elected (call on data from Unit 1). More democratic! Means more legitimate! (be sure to explain what these words mean) Explain why this is a good thing. However: Potentially want more power; likely to exercise its current powers more (Delay -1 year) DEADLOCK – lack of legislation Elected chamber may remove continuity of service – continuity allows for building of expertise and experience of government However, staggered elections can solve this But these make it less democratic Could an elected and more legitimate Lords counterbalance the political dominance of the...

Words: 332 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Baroness Dilemma

...Baroness DilemmaAs he left for a visit to his outlying districts, the jealous Baron warned his pretty wife: “Do not leave the castle while I am gone, or I will punish you severely when I return!” But, as the hours passed, the young Baroness grew lonely and despite her husband’s warning, decided to visit her Lover who lived in the countryside nearby. The castle was located on an island in a wide, fast flowing river, with a drawbridge linking the island and the land at the narrowest point in the river. “Surely my husband will not return before dawn,” she thought, and ordered her servants to lower the drawbridge and leave it down until she returned. After spending several pleasant hours with her Lover, the Baroness returned to the drawbridge, only to find it blocked by a Madman wildly waving a long and extremely sharp knife. “Do not attempt to cross this bridge, Baroness, or I will kill you,” he raved. Fearing for her life, the Baroness returned to her Lover and asked him to help. “Our relationship is only a romantic one,” he said, “I will not help.” The Baroness then sought out a Boatman on the river, explained her plight to him, and asked him to take her across the river on his boat. “I will do it, but only if you can pay me my fee of five Marks.” “But I have no money with me!” the Baroness protested. “That is too bad. No money, no ride,” the Boatman said flatly. Her fear growing, the Baroness ran crying to the home of a Friend, and after again explaining the situation...

Words: 341 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Magna Carta

...protect the rights and property of the Barons and Nobles of 13th century England. The livelihood and well-being of the common man or peasants was not taken into account when the nobles illustrated this historic document. According to U.S. National Records & Archives Administration (2007), “No freeman shall be taken, imprisoned, disseized, outlawed, banished, or in any way destroyed, nor will we proceed against or prosecute him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land” (p. 1). In this paper, I will be discussing the noble’s complaints concerning the Magna Carta, the noble’s interests compared to the king’s, and some interests that both the king and nobles agreed upon. One of the biggest complaints that the barons and nobles had about the Magna Carta was the increase in royal taxes. King John, was also increasing abusive commands when it came to the Royal Justice System. The barons and nobles wanted limited rights for the King, but oddly enough more rights for themselves. King John, frequently sold legal rights to the highest paying bidder and used the Royal Justice System to reward the people he held close and punish those people who disobeyed. The barons and nobles were looking for less taxation and less overall power held by the King. When it came to the barons and nobles of 13th century England, they viewed themselves as high society and wanted to be “legally” treated as such. At one point in 1215, the barons and nobles were so outraged by the...

Words: 832 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Conflict Between King John and the Barons

... King John vs. The English Barons The conflict between King John and the barons began as early as 1204. King John had lost most of the English held territories in Northern France by this time. This was very upsetting to the barons because King John would demand more taxes and more men, both of which were supplied by the barons. This was to try and regain these lost territories. In 1214 King John was defeated in Northern France a second time and again demanded more taxes and men. The barons were no longer going to accept this. They had decided to rebel against the King and chose East Anglian baron, Robert FitzWalther to lead them.(BBC History) The rebellion had begun and the barons had declared war on King John on May 3, 1215.(history.edjakeman) The majority of the barons did not join the rebellion but did not support the king and remained neutral {BBC History) Each side had their own position on the problems and what needed to be done to make things work between the two sides. The barons felt King John was being unfair in many ways. They felt that John was demanding more and more money but they were getting smaller roles in government and not getting half the benefits.(history.edjakeman) The barons were not only resentful about money but that King John was using foreigners in service and then giving them appointed positions. “[The most] essential difference between the crown and the [barons was] the crown felt its aristocracy...

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dior

...Assess the arguments in favour of a largely or wholly elected second chamber. (25) Introduction: What is our second chamber? HoL – currently appointed for Life – briefly say how this developed: why are there life peerages, how do they work, who do they tend to be, how are they appointed? What happened to the hereditary peerages? What is currently proposed for the House of Lords? This article states what Labour’s proposal is, then assesses the strengths of an unelected house (as it is at the moment). Right, now you need to assess the arguments in favour of an elected (partly or wholly) House of Lords! It might make the House of Lords more representative! Explain why this is a good thing. Explain how the House of Lords composition is now (look it up). Then EVALUATE: Would it being an elected house actually make it more ‘representative’? Composition of House of Commons is still rather unrepresentative, despite being elected (call on data from Unit 1). More democratic! Means more legitimate! (be sure to explain what these words mean) Explain why this is a good thing. However: Potentially want more power; likely to exercise its current powers more (Delay -1 year) DEADLOCK – lack of legislation Elected chamber may remove continuity of service – continuity allows for building of expertise and experience of government However, staggered elections can solve this But these make it less democratic Could an elected and more legitimate Lords counterbalance the political dominance...

Words: 332 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Robber Barons Research Paper

...What are some arguments in favor of the Robber Barons (or captains of industry)? Just as professor Burton mentioned, the Robber Barons were not one sided, in that they were only good or bad. The truth is that they were complex individuals that did do good and bad things. In addition, one argument in favor of Robber Barons consists of the philanthropy that these individuals practiced. Consequently, in many cases their intentions may be maleficent, however, if the donations that these individuals made to society helped, then they can be labeled as beneficial. For example, Daniel Drew built several churches; helped found Drew Theological Seminary and Drew Seminary for Young Ladies. These institutions helped society in a positive fashion. Additionally,...

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Robber Baron or Captains of Industry Quandry

...Robber Barons Nikki Jakus – 5th In 1859, Frederick Douglass delivered a lecture in which h explained America's success as the effect of men's drive to conquer each new frontier they were faced with, whether it was the mysterious West, or the struggle for land and resources. They used theses invisible walls as motivation to fuel their drives in building a new nation from nothing. Thus the American Dream was born. These men, those who, born with none of the advantages/privileges of others yet managed to become great successes through their own hard work and determination, became known as Self Made Men. Rugged, independent, and driven: they became pioneers of their time. They lead the way in progress and innovation during the Gilded age. One of history's best know examples of a Self Made Man is Andrew Carnegie, the Steel king . Born in Scotland to hand loom weavers, his family immigrated to America when the mechanization of the cotton industry put them out of work. They settled down in Allegheny, PA where Carnegie worked as an errand boy in a textile mill to support his financially struggling family. He soon gained a job in a telegraph office where he proved himself dedicated when he memorized addresses and names. When his father died he was left the sole supporter of his family at age 20. With little education, Carnegie taught himself at the library and night school. While in the telegraph industry, he proposed new ideas that increased profit in Railways and communication...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Men Who Built America

...“The Men Who Built America” “The Men Who Built America” was based off of three men, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie, each played a very important role in making America what it is today. Rockefeller made a monopoly off of standard oil. Vanderbilt made a monopoly of the railroad system in America while Carnegie made a monopoly from steel. The men had many accomplishments throughout their lives. John D. Rockefeller was born on July 8, 1839 and was an American industrialist and philanthropist. He founded Standard Oil which dominated the oil industry and became the first great U.S. business trust. Standard Oil began as an Ohio partnership formed by John D. Rockefeller, his brother William Rockefeller, Henry Flagler, Jabez Bostwick, chemistSamuel Andrews, and a silent partner, Stephen V. Harkness.  Adjusting for inflation, he is often regarded as the richest person in history. Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in retirement. His fortune was mainly used to create the modern systematic approach of targeted philanthropy. He was able to do this through the creation of foundations that had a major effect on medicine, education, and scientific research. When he died on May 23, 1937 he left his son John D. Rockefeller Jr. was entrusted with the supervisions of the foundations. Cornelius Vanderbilt was born on May 27, 1794 and was also an American industrialist and philanthropist. Vanderbilt made his fortune in the shipping and railroads industry. He was also the...

Words: 638 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Andrew Carnegie

...the south, this inspired people to begin investing and building, along with influencing stocks and bonds. The people who did this were known as “robber barons”, which was a derogatory term to describe their greed. The rest of the economy was slowly realizing that these “robber barons” had much more power in the economy than many governments. In 1970 when the economy began its downfall into a depression, hundreds of thousands of people found themselves suddenly without a job. This led people to wonder if the robber barons would organize any types of charity to help out those less fortunate. Since these were the people who controlled all of the money, only time would tell if they would help out. Andrew Carnegie was the first robber baron to start donating, mostly to universities and libraries. Carnegie was not born wealthy, but slowly started off working as a messenger boy. He made such a strong impression that he was soon promoted to secretary, earning $35 a week. His superintendent at the railroad took a strong liking to him, often giving investment tips. He made good investments, which paid off big time. He learned how to produce steel and started a few plants, making more money than he had ever dreamed of. Carnegie’s goal was to earn $50,000 a year and anything else more, he could give away. Eventually another robber baron bought him company out, but this still left Carnegie with more money than he knew what to do with. The first great spending of his fortune was creating...

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Andrew Carnegie Research Paper

...The men who allegedly built America had many privileges that are not allowed today because of many things that they did. Men like Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, and Henry Ford did many things as a group that were unethical and unlawful, while creating ideas that did helped to further the business world, but the laws that were made to cover these laws and unethical things that they did been tightened down so much. Andrew Carnegie- Born on Nov. 25 in dunfermline, Scotland. He grew up poor and got a job at the age of 13 in a factory earning $1.20 a week. Andrew Carnegie’s mother lived with him until 1886 when she passed away. The following year he married Louise Whitfield(History.com). Andrew and Louise had one child, a daughter named Margaret. As a young teenager he took a job working for Thomas Scott at one of the biggest railroad companies. Carnegie’s first major accomplishment was designing a bridge that crossed the Mississippi River that connected east and west for major trade and rail travel. (Bio.com) In order to build this bridge Carnegie had to find a way to buy cheaper steel to not end up bankrupt. Carnegie solved this problem by producing his own steel in a new more effective way. Carnegie co-founded his first steel factory in Pittsburgh in the 1870’s(history.com). Carnegie had the only factory in the United States and being able to underbid other companies Carnegie decided to buy other factories and begin his empire. By 1889...

Words: 2014 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Student Enrollment

...K-Sean Burrell April 24, 2013 HIS 152 Were the nineteenth century entrepreneurs Robber barons or captains of industry? Captains of Industries played a major role in the economic development of the United States during the late nineteenth century. Persevering from poverty, powerful industrialists such as John Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, and Cornelius Vanderbilt became the utmost wealthiest businessmen in America. Driven by one motive, wealth, these men were able to control entire sectors of the economy. Interestingly, this process created new jobs, increased the availability of goods, and monetary donations towards the welfare of the people helped establish libraries, museums and colleges. Each individual is a “captain of industry” because they positively advanced establishments leading to great success for American society. Revolutionizing the petroleum industry, John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil Company in 1870 which helped businesses such as the railroad with their tariff flow. John D. Rockefeller was a genius businessman with an ambition for success. Rockefeller was able to reduce his competition by inventing new ideas such as “quantity discount”, which would charge less if the customer bought more. Rockefeller could persuade individuals to purchase his oil instead of competitors because it appeared cheaper. Quoted by John D. Rockefeller in an interview with William Hoster “I believe the power to make money is a gift of God ... to...

Words: 1093 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

None

...The Men who built America: a True Tale of Innovation Change is an inevitable fact of life and it also applies in the world of business in countless ways. Staying ahead of the crowd of competitors is part of innovation and the greatest business pioneers of our time were the best at adapting to the environment that surrounded them and their influence. “The Men who Built America” shows many interesting parts of the business world both good and bad. Hostile takeovers and buyouts were byproducts of the tension between competing industries and business tycoons, especially in the midst of the Industrial Revolution of early America. Many traits are represented in great business leaders but innovating may be the single best thing to be skilled at. Cornelius Vanderbilt was originally one of the first of many American pioneers and he thrived in setting new trends and finding ways to step ahead of competition. Innovation was his biggest ally in overcoming the rivals in his industry. He originally started with a shipping business that he brought up from nothing and soon used big ships to transport numerous kinds of materials to both the east and west coasts of the country. When the railroad industry was first taking off, Vanderbilt saw a path of profit and potential. The shipping business he owned was one of the greatest companies of its time but Vanderbilt had the eye to see potential into a new type of business that was faster and more efficient. It also created larger profit...

Words: 2351 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Why Robber Barons Are The Captains Of Industry

...After the Civil War, an era known as the Gilded Age where US's economy was growing and cities was changing. Industrialist such as Carnegie and Rockefeller was crowned with the name of Captains of Industry and Robber Barons. The industrialist should be considered as Captains of Industry because they helped with the urbanization in the city, helped with US economy's growth, and donated large amount of money toward public organizations. One of the reasons why the industrialists are the Captains of Industry is because they helped with the urbanization. For example, "Workers in agriculture outnumber all other 52 to 48 percent in 1870, but by 1900 no farming labor constituted 60 percent of the workforce. In 1870 the nation had only twenty-five cities with...

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Robber Barons Role In Westward Expansion

...Robber Barons played a huge role in westward expansion as well as the connection between the eastern and western parts of the United States. Names such as Cornelius Vanderbilt, James Hill, and Edward Harriman were all railroad tycoons who shaped the way America transported goods, as well as themselves. After the civil war America entered a second industrial revolution, where capitalism grew, and business tycoons took advantage of poverty and dependence from the American public. These Business tycoons, also known as Robber Barons, were able to take advantage of the way the country was and make money off it. In the late 1800s, wealthy industrialists controlled much of America’s wealth. Many of these "Robber Barons" took advantage of post-Civil...

Words: 385 - Pages: 2