Free Essay

British History

In:

Submitted By yuqingma123
Words 610
Pages 3
Britain, 1906-1914
The reasons for the ‘Liberal landslide’ in 1906
Debate: The 1906 general election has encouraged debate about whether the result was due primarily to Conservative weaknesses or to Liberal strengths.
The Boer War: 1. It was far more costly in lives and money than had been expected and some of the methods used to defeat the Boers caused moral outcry in Britain. 2. It had revealed the effect of poverty in the cities, reflected in the findings by Booth and Rowntree that 10% of people in major cities lived below the poverty line. 3. It revealed the low national efficiency at that time and the need for social reforms. The Liberals had also gained support by claiming that the Conservatives had neglected this. 4. The war also had the effect of encouraging Joseph Chamberlain to push his campaign for tariff reform, which was argued as the Conservatives’ biggest policy misjudgement.
The 1902 Education Act: 1. It provided for all schools to be funded from local rates. It was an unpopular reform with many amongst the electorate. 2. It had also helped to reunite the Liberal Party after the Boer War and restore Nonconformist support for the Liberals. A campaign was launched against the act led by the Liberal MP David Lloyd George.

The 1904 Licensing Act:

1. Another issue annoyed nonconformist voters. Nonconformists denounced the 1904 Act as a ‘brewers’ bill’.

The Chinese labour issue between 1902 and 1904:

1. It annoyed not only the nonconformists but also the trade unionists. The British trade unions feared that employers might bring the so-called’ Chinese slavery’ into Britain, so pushing down wages at home.
The Taff Vale case: 1. Balfour’s ongoing refusal to rectify the Taff Vale Case by legislation was a major concern of trade unions and their members. This encouraged trade union support for the idea of a Labour group in parliament.

The Tariff reform campaign 1903:

It was probably the Conservatives’ biggest policy misjudgement.

(Short-term factors):

1. In 1903 the tariff reform campaign was launched by Joseph Chamberlain, known as Imperial Protectionism. Both working class and middle class feared that tariffs would mean dearer food and falling living standards. 2. Tariff reform divided the Conservative government and party, one leading Conservative, Winston Churchill, actually voted with the Liberals on this issue in 1904.

(Long-term factors):

1. This issue helped to reunite and strengthen the Liberal Party because belief in Free Trade was something all Liberals strongly supported. All Liberals were united behind the banner of economics laissez-fair policy, which was a ‘bread and butter’ issue of great concern to voters in all classes.

The Conservative prime minister: A.J. Balfour 1. He had piloted the Education Bill through parliament himself, failed to see the political implications of ‘Chinese slavery’ which was a concern of both the middle and working classes 2. Perhaps his biggest mistake, allowed the Unionists to split over tariff reform with Balfour and his supporters trying to hold the balance by ‘sitting on the fence’ between Chamberlain’s supporters and the free traders. 3. His resignation in late 1905, even before the General Election, smacked of (smack of = seems to have bad qualities) weakness and unpopularity of the Prime Minister and his Party.

The Lib-Lab Pact: 1. Campbell-Bannerman forged an agreement with Ramsay Macdonald (Leader of LRC-Labout representation comitee), whereby the Liberals would not oppose Labour candidates in the next general election in 30 Constituencies inEngland and Wales. In return, the LRC promised to restric their candidates in other constituencies and so prevent a split in the anti-Conservative vote and also reduced Liberal’s election cost.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

British History

...Dossier #6 TRADITION AND MODERNITY “The sun never sets on the British Empire. "This famous quote is often used to show the large number of territories that Britain had all over the world during the seventeenth to the middle of the twentieth century. By extension, this also shows the scope of its influencel. The first of this set of three documents is the opening speech to the 2012 Olympic Games given by Academy Award winner film director Danny Boyles under whose direction the whole programme fell. At first sight Boyle’s text seem somewhat unrelated to the Olympics as it seems rather like a tribute to Britain and we get the impression that he was on a mission of patriotism lauding Britain as a great country. However, to put this speech into perspective it may be worthwhile to bear in mind the fact that, as mandated by the Olympic Charter, the formal ceremonial opening of this international sporting event is combined with an artistic spectacle to showcase the host nation’s culture. We can therefore understand the relevance of the contents of this opening speech. In fact, the different sections of the ceremony were designed to reflect aspects of British history and culture. Document 2 is the 2006 logo of the British Conservatist party. The previous logo of a torch which was used from 1983 until then was abandoned because of its negative association with the party under Margaret Thatcher. The torch emblem logo having been introduced in the Iron Lady’s eighties heyday, David...

Words: 2804 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

British Economic History

...British Economic History Supervision 4 ''Qualitative aspects of living standards, such as the disamenities of urban living, have become the decisive factors in evaluating whether the English working classes benefited from Industrial Revolution''. Introduction One of the most controversial issues of British Economic History is the living standards during the industrial revolution. ''Pessimists'' against ''optimists'' oppose their ideas about whether the standards of live during the industrial revolution improved,deteriorated or remained stable. On the one hand,optimists like Jeffrey G.Williamson, held the view that although some workers suffered from harsh working conditions and were working more days,the increase in real wages could offset these disamenities and as a whole,the majority of people lived from 1760 to 1850 benefited from the industrial revolution in terms of standards of life. On the other hand,pessimists like Charles H. Feinstein argued that the living standards of life deteriorated for the working class in early industrialisation. The main difference in the perception of judging the living standards between optimists and pessimists is the distinction between the importance of qualitative and quantitative factors that influenced the lives of workers during industrialisation. On the ''quantitative side'',optimists base the arguments on real wages,life expectancy and on the move to the cities away...

Words: 2221 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

British History Essay

...Fmkdfnbkjdfnbldfksjnbdlfjkbnlfgj sjklgn fkljs nskljg ndskjlndljknsdhkn kjl nkljfnlkj nkjldfnlkj fsdnfjlkhn jkl nkjldndjksnhln Njkcgnfkdjlbnkljfd bjklnfnbjlkdfnbjkl nbkjnf kjlndfkl jnkjlsn kjndfkj nslkj njklfndsgkjsnflkjnsd kjlfnkjn kn jk n jkfnds gjkdsn gkjsfdng kjlsdn ksjnbjknfj nfkj bnsfkj nfklsdj bnkjdlfnkljbdnkljfdbnfdkljbl s blnj nsklj nskl jdnsbfjkl ds n kjnf kjbnklfjdnkjldsv j I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE DICKS IN MY BUTT I LOVE...

Words: 2912 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

History Of British Control Of The Bullion: Mercantilism

...Matthew Jensen Mr. Vitale British Lit 23 March 2015 British Control of the Bullion Mercantilism started around three hundred years ago for the wealth of the mother nation. The British government wanted colonies because colonies would increase their wealth and power. The thought was that no great nation would be able to exist and survive without colonies. In the beginning of the 17th century, mercantilism was becoming a popular economic theory in the British Empire. However, this is not the first time in history that mercantilism shows up. This economic policy appeared in France as a state intervention, which would protect the domestic merchants and manufactures. The origin of this economic policy comes from a man named Adam Smith....

Words: 1459 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Betsy Ross Research Paper

...Every American student learns in school the patriotic accounts that formed this country. Although these stories reflect real events, the truth has been stretched in some of the more famous tales. The most famous patriotic stories all contain common myths the American public believes. The signing of the Declaration of Independence, Betsy Ross’ design of the American flag, and Paul Revere’s midnight ride all contain factual inaccuracies or exaggerations. When learning American history, students typically believe that all fifty-six delegates at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia signed the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. Americans celebrate this date as Independence Day. The actual date, however, that America declared independence from England was July 2, 1776. The next couple days were spent going over the original draft written by Thomas Jefferson. The confusion of the two dates is because...

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

History Is a Lie

...novels, essays, historical and scientific works. His best-known histories are The Age of Louis XIV (1751), and his Essay on the Customs and the Spirit of the Nations (1756). He broke from the tradition of narrating political and military events, and emphasized traditions, societal history and achievements in the arts and sciences. One of his famous sayings, “History is the lie commonly agreed upon”, is quite contrary as some agree with it while others argue that that is not the case. Based on the analysis and readings I agree with what Voltaire said. Some people associate history with past whereas history is not the same as past. As past is the occurrence of all the events even the minor ones while history is the selection of some events from the past which are then given meaning to by the historians. So what we study is not actually history but historiography (the writings of history). An example of which can be a person selling gingerbread man in a low lying area and some random people come to his stall and beat him up and kill him [1]. So the historians will not give importance to this event – which is definitely part of the past but it is not the part of written history. At the same time history is majorly affected by the involvement of the role of power in its writing. History is always created by the winners. This means that the people who are on the winning end of any event will determine what the correct history will be. This can be seen with the example of Germany losing...

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Loyalist Rebuttal To Common Sense Summary

...History has been an essential pillar point in our society today. As we look back through history, we can observe that the winners of war were the ones to write History. Have we ever wondered about what the losing side might have to say about the exact time period? The “A loyalist Rebuttal to common sense,” by Rev. Charles Inglis presents to us the view of the opposing side of the time period. In the article Ingis states that the “Common sense” by Thomas Paine makes no assimilation or identify any realistic view of the lives of the colonist during the time period. As Thomas Paine “Common Sense,” intrigues the colonist towards rebellion, Ingis is alarmed by the repercussions of the behaviors and the affects rebellion would have on the country. The major problem that Ingis identifies, is whenever he read the Common Sense is that it all Paine’s main goal is to, “poison their minds...

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

History

...children study history? There is no doubt that the primary purpose of schooling is to prepare students to function effectively in the world, and thereby to assist society to function effectively as well. We study the past in school not because students need to know a collection of old facts, but because history helps them understand how the world works and how human beings behave. Knowledge of the past is required for understanding present realities. When people share some common knowledge of history, they can discuss their understandings with one another. What does history give?Human self-awareness is the very essence of history. Arnold Toynbee said, “History is a search for light on the nature and destiny of man.” R.G. Collingwood wrote, “History is for human self-knowledge…the only clue to what man can do is what man has done. The value of history, then, is that it teaches us what man has done and thus what man is. Psychologist Bruno Bettleheim asserted that human self-knowledge is the most important role of education.” Most of all, our schools ought to teach the true nature of man, teach about his troubles with himself, his inner turmoil and about his difficulties in living with others. They should teach the prevalence and the power of both man’s social and asocial tendencies, and how the one can domesticate the other, without destroying his independence or self-love.” Read more: http://socyberty.com/education/teaching-history-is-important/#ixzz21GQnYhj0 Why history in the elementary...

Words: 3105 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Colonial Argumentative Essay

...Stories are predictable. They’re typically written with rising action, an intense climax, and a satisfying resolution. History, on the opposing hand, isn’t so simple. It continues to go on regardless of its many climaxes. To some critics, history can never give a decided ending. The Colonial era would serve as an example of that. The founding of America was a title wave of various controversies as well as having many ups and downs. The only resolution to such undependability, according to the leaders of that time period, was the eventual signing of the Declaration of Independence. The reason for this declarative action by the colonists was due to the indecisive and power tightfisted British government. To better understand this claim, it’s imperative to first analyze the origins of Colonial America. A question that ought to be asked is, why colonize? It was no doubt a risky endeavor by the British Commonwealth. Some critics, such as Christopher Columbus, would argue that it was due to religious attempts to expand Faith. It was in fact, something entirely different - power. It was a power move for the English leaders to encourage colonization in the New World. Eric Foner said it best, “National power and glory, they argued,...

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Does We Repeat the History

...We don’t learn from History, we repeat it? By dhara on November 17, 2010 in Articles I think its agreeable that if we don’t learn from history we would repeat it again.For example: If a person like Hitler borns back then now we will not ignore his acts may be we will take persistent actions to get rid off from him and his actions. History is proof that has examples of people repeating the mistakes of the past. Many of those mistakes are being repeated in the world today. This “law” is true whether it be on an international level, or a personal one. This is one of the things which is annoyable when said “We must let the kids learn from their own mistakes”. Bull. If you love your children, you will hope to teach them to avoid that which is harmful to them by trying to let them learn from YOUR mistakes. Learning by one’s own mistake can often be too late, and you can be too dead to learn anything from it. Insanity is repeating the same mistakes of the past and expecting a different outcome. But—— What if Orville and Wilbur Wright had paid attention to the history of attempts at flight? Would you be using the Internet if Gordon Moore had spent more time building a computer “the historically correct way” rather than designing the ridiculously tiny processor he developed? How many of you would prefer the good old days of medicine to what we have now? With all of the History majors the colleges crank out you would think that there wouldn’t be any more war, crime, or poverty...

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Age Of Revolution Summary

...impossible. When was still married to Betty Draper. At the beginning of 21st century American historian could learn such an artifact? forward to the new political history of illusion, why should anyone bother to renew old? In a book written in old age we can learn important things Draper Revolution? Well, of course, the answer is yes. In contemporary American educational institutions, Hobsbawm is probably the best stability...

Words: 1326 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Happy

...History As An Interpretation Growing up in a conservative environment I was taught that what everyone said was the truth and if you were told something about the past it was to be taken as a fact. To me there was not a single argument to the fact that the pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. But as you get older you start to understand concepts and motives and to not be so naive. As I grew up my grandparents always told me to take everything “with a grain of salt” which meant to not eagerly accept every detail as a fact but to look at everything from a different perspective until you can formulate your own ideas on a certain subject. This new way of thinking helped cure some of my adolescent naiveness. When I first signed up for this class I had no idea what to expect; I knew it was an honors class and I wanted the challenge, but as far as the class structure would go I had no idea as to how things would be run. Immediately I knew this was a different type of class because most classes I had taken in the past would look at a pre-approved book and we would memorize and accept everything it said down to the letter. This unfortunately, as I learned through this class, presented an incredible biased view and opinion on various subjects. For instance I was taught that the war with japan was basically us saving these savage and cruel beasts. It taught of the horrors of torture to American P.O.W. and the sucker punch Japan delivered during the attack on Pearl Harbor. To me it was obvious...

Words: 1025 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Assignment

...All history is historiography, and none of it is objective. All history is historiography, and none of it is objective. History is not just what really happened in the past, but a complex intersection of truths, bias and hopes. History encompasses at least three different ways of accessing the past: it can be remembered, recovered or even invented. All are imperfect in some way. No historian or historical source reveals the full and unvarnished truth, so memory is a imperfect guide. Sometimes the significance of recovered data is hard to determine. Furthermore, many rumored "histories" can be shown to have been invented; at the same time, however, these fabrications still tell us much about a society's beliefs and dreams. In reality, the best histories are the best stories. History is anything but an endeavor that should be consigned to some dusty shelf on the top floor of a library nobody ever visits. It's, ironically, the most modern, most relevant, most incendiary discipline there is, to judge by nothing more than the number of car bombings, shootings and other atrocities committed in the name of warring pasts. Edward Said’s “Orientalism” has reverberated in each of the disciplines that collectively constitute Middle East Studies, including history. The book had positive effects. It forced us to take seriously the reality of the power relations produced and reinforced by British and French colonialism, and to detect the way in which those power relations...

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reviewing the Past the Patriot

...A. What elements in the film are historically accurate and which are inaccurate? Give examples from the article to illustrate.  Some elements of the film were accurate such as guerilla war fare on both sides such as the British slaughtering villages and the Americans killing officers first in the battle. There are also inaccuracies that historians have found such as the character Benjamin Martin and the battle of Cowpens which Cornwallis was not present. Many historians criticized the movie for these inaccuracies to the point where it was even compared the Godzilla to biology. B. In your view, do the historical inaccuracies harm or help our understanding of past events and historical figures? Explain I think in this particular movie it does harm the understanding because the revolutionary war was the birth of our nation, and for the movie to have incorrect information takes away the realization of the war. We as Americans are proud of our for fathers fight for our nations freedom, so for someone who loves history might have a problem with the movie, but if you don’t really want to take the time to research movies like this are good to get the jest of history. C. In your view, do the historical inaccuracies harm or help our understanding of the present (people or groups)? That is to say, is the director using historical events and people to make a point about America and Americans today? Explain. For this particular movie I think the director did a good job as representing...

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Histography

...Historiography It is the study of the history and methodology of the discipline of history. The term historiography also denotes a body of historical work on a specialized topic. Scholars discuss historiography topically – such as the “historiography of Catholicism,” the “historiography of early Islam,” or the “historiography of China" – as well as specific approaches such as political history and social history. Beginning in the nineteenth century, at the ascent of academic history, a corpus of historiography literature developed. Furay and Salevouris (1988) define historiography as "the study of the way history has been and is written — the history of historical writing... When you study 'historiography' you do not study the events of the past directly, but the changing interpretations of those events in the works of individual historians." Questions studied Some of the common questions of historiography are: 1. Reliability of the sources used, in terms of authorship, credibility of the author, and the authenticity or corruption of the text. (See also source criticism). 2. Historiographical tradition or framework. Every historian uses one (or more) historiographical traditions, for example Marxist, Annales School, "total history", or political history. The historiography of early Islam refers to the study of the early origins of Islam based on a critical analysis, evaluation, and examination of authentic primary source materials and the organization of these sources into...

Words: 985 - Pages: 4