1) Yes, I believe that Project Share is altruistic in nature and serves the greater good of man and it is also a good business decision for the company. I have postulated some of my thoughts on the writings of Milton Friedman. While I have no objections to giving back to the community and doing social good, I do believe that a majority of the money, time and effort should come from employee contributions rather than corporate dollars used for funds, grants and scholarships. Companies should limit their direct involvement in these activities using just their brand and influence to raise public awareness to the cause, so long as it is consistent with the companies’ values and beliefs. I also believe it is the firm’s primary job is to focus on delivering the highest possible return of shareholder value. If a company cannot produce a profit, or sustain the shareholder’s appetite, then the possibility of promoting a Project Share cannot exist. Everything in the business revolution is predicated on returning value. I should clarify, that my statements above are based upon the fact the companies in discussion are publicly traded and not private entities. Private entities, which include partnerships, limited liability corporations and other non-traded companies with limited employees and owners who are the sole shareholders, can operate as the social responsibility doctrine as they see fit.

2) Milton Friedman’s, belief was that the one and only one social responsibility of a company is to” use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.”(Beauchamp, Bowie & Arnold, 2009, p.55) He also believed that corporations cannot have responsibilities but it is based upon the people within the companies. Project Share is