A most number of facts prove that changes in the approach employers direct the efforts of employees have significant allegations for the time allegations of work. A rise in the literature directs to the 'greedy' (Coser, 1974) character which is also called as post-Fordist (Amin, 1994; DiPrete et al., 2002), post-industrial (Lewis, 2003), post-modern (Kumar, 1995) or very effective presentation work (Appelbaum et al., 2000; Osterman, 2000; Godard, 2001). These concepts contribute to the statement that there has been a shift from work based on the authority from the higher level to the lower level will result in more flexible production technologies. Generally, the theory consist of some form of team-based work, advances in training structure and line of business progress, and performance-related compensation (Ramsay et al., 2000; White et al., 2003; DiPrete at al., 2002; Appelbaum et al., 2000; Perlow, 1999). These measures involve management giving up many restrictions imposed on employees and bringing in a variety of techniques which are aimed to increase employees' work contentment and obligation (Ramsay et al., 2000). The penalty for this job proposed for the worker is heralded with phrases like 'employability' and 'empowerment'. By facilitating employees to contribute and be appropriate to their acquaintance and proficiency more fully, a better output is achieved at working (Ramsay et al., 2000; Baron and Kreps, 1999). When taken in a positive account this comes down to freeing employees from suppression on work from many years in the past and replacing them with difficult tasks, self-government and accomplishment. (E.g. Sennett, 1998; Vallas, 1999; Godard, 2001). (Meyers, 1997)