Free Essay

Category Moody's Rating

In:

Submitted By chrisxmei
Words 2919
Pages 12
Credit Opinion: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Global Credit Research - 13 Aug 2013
Chicago, Illinois, United States

Ratings
Category Moody's Rating

Outlook Corporate Family Rating Sr Sec Bank Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Commercial Paper Speculative Grade Liquidity

Negative Ba2 Baa2/LGD1 Ba3/LGD4 NP SGL-2

Contacts
Analyst Phone

Bill Wolfe/Toronto Donald S. Carter, CFA/Toronto

416.214.3847 416.214.3851

Key Indicators
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company 2010 2011 2012 LTM Q2-2013 $10,018.9 $10,611.0 $10,221.9 $10,278.5 4.0x 4.6x 4.4x 4.4x 5.7% 8.6% 7.9% 8.8% 3.1x 2.6x 2.6x 2.6x 4.2x 3.9x 3.6x 3.5x 15.0% 13.3% 14.2% 13.2%

Net Sales (in Millions) Debt / EBITDA FCF / Debt (EBITDA-Capex) / Interest (FFO+Interest) / Interest RCF / Debt All ratios reflect Moody's Standard Accounting Adjustments

Note: For definitions of Moody's most common ratio terms please see the accompanying User's Guide.

Opinion Rating Drivers
- Muted general economic conditions and continued over-capacity limit prospects for cash flow growth - The rating depends on ongoing de-levering

Corporate Profile
Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RR Donnelley) is North America's largest commercial printing company, with annual revenues of approximately $10.3 billion of which 74% comes from North American operations while 26% is international. RR Donnelley provides pre-media, printing, logistics and business process outsourcing products and services.

SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
RR Donnelley is weakly positioned at the Ba2 level because of elevated leverage and very weak industry

fundamentals evidenced by stalled revenue growth. With organic revenue growth having stalled and given the implication that EBITDA will stagnate, management implemented more conservative Debt-to-EBITDA policies, and the rating assumes significant debt repayment as efforts to restore financial flexibility unfold. We expect management to apply virtually all of the company's nearly $300 million of annual free cash flow (Moody's estimated) towards debt reduction for the foreseeable future. The rating continues to benefit from the company's resilient cash flow profile. During the 2008/2009 recession, despite 2009 revenue being 15% less than in 2008 and despite a 34% EBITDA decline, the company remained cash flow positive in 2009.

DETAILED RATING CONSIDERATIONS
- MUTED GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND CONTINUED OVER-CAPACITY LIMIT PROSPECTS FOR CASH FLOW GROWTH Commercial printing is a very fragmented and competitive industry with chronic over-capacity that causes pricing and margin pressure. This pressure was significantly magnified in the 2008/2009 recession. Conditions rebounded in 2010, however, based on shipments of key paper grades used by commercial printing companies, we believe the 2010 gains were given back in 2011 and conditions have been relatively stagnant since then. We believe that capacity utilization, the value of industrial production, and consumption of paper grades consumed by commercial printing companies, three parameters we track to gauge industry conditions, remain at or below recessionary trough levels. We also see little potential for improvement as digital media continues to displace print. We estimate industry-wide capacity utilization at 60%-to-70%. Permanent improvement in the capacity utilization rate will be difficult to manage. We know from paper and forest products industry indicators that North American demand for coated and uncoated communications papers, key paper grades for commercial printing, is on a long term downwards trend of approximately 5% per year. Consequently, even with consolidation shuttering printing capacity, we anticipate fundamentals languishing and margins remaining in the same general range as recent observations. RR Donnelley continues to diversify its revenue base. However, the company is unable to diversify into businesses with growth prospects that exceed GDP, and we believe that diversification efforts involve taking share from competitors in adjacent industries. Consequently, while the effort is credit-positive, at best it is playing margin-maintaining defense but does not provide cash flow up-side. - THE RATING DEPENDS ON ONGOING DE-LEVERING The company's debt load and dividend pay-out were sized prior to recent industry contraction and ongoing margin compression that has reduced EBITDA. In its February 26, 2013 earnings release, RR Donnelley announced a more conservative, 2.25x-to-2.75x, target range for leverage of Debt-to-EBITDA (revised from 2.5x-to-3.0x). The target leverage range revision and stage-setting for de-levering are both credit-positive, however, pending Moody's adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA reaching 3.75x by 2015, RR Donnelley will be weakly positioned at the Ba2 rating level. We expect interest expense plus the dividend will consume an aggregate of more than 45% of EBITDA during 2013 and 2014. With capital expenditures consuming a further 28% of EBITDA and with cash taxes increasing and with mandated pension funding, conversion of EBITDA into (after-dividend) free cash flow is somewhat limited at approximately $300 million per year, a modest 6% of debt (in the above discussion, capital expenditures, EBITDA, interest expense and debt are inclusive of Moody's standard adjustments). The rating assumes significant debt repayment as efforts to restore financial flexibility unfold. We expect management to apply all of the company's nearly $300 million of Moody's-estimated after-dividend free cash flow towards debt reduction for the foreseeable future. Execution risks include unexpected operational set-backs or a change in management's commitment. The rating continues to benefit from the company's resilient cash flow profile. During the 2008/2009 recession, despite 2009 revenue being 15% less than in 2008 and despite a 34% EBITDA decline, the company remained cash flow positive in 2009. Together with good liquidity, this provides important downside protection. There is also the potential of dividend reduction augmenting debt reduction efforts. Despite a constant per share dividend over the past several years and share buy-backs that have reduced the share count, the proportion of cash from operations (before working capital changes) consumed by the dividend has increased from 16% in 2007 to an estimated 21% LTM. While the rating does not presume dividend reduction, nor does it presume asset sales which are also a possible source of supplementary cash flow, accelerated debt reduction would be credit-positive.

Liquidity
With challenging fundamentals and a business whose activity levels are volatile, RR Donnelley needs to have solid liquidity arrangements. We assess the company's liquidity arrangements as being good (SGL-2). RR Donnelley has a well-spaced ladder of debt maturities and we expect the company to generate in excess of $300 million some 25% of EBITDA, after interest expense (30% of EBITDA), capital expenditures (28% of EBITDA), and dividends (16% of EBITDA). This source of liquidity would normally be augmented by cash on hand, but $248 million of the company's $354 million cash balance is held offshore and is subject to local country income or withholding taxes if repatriated, implying that the usable cash balance is much lower. RR Donnelley's main source of third party liquidity is a $1.15 billion revolving credit facility that matures in October 2017. The facility is sized at a reasonable 11% of annual sales. At June 30, 2013, the revolver was undrawn and the company had a cash balance of $354 million (although, as noted above, a significant portion was held off-shore and would result in significant taxes were it repatriated). Access to the credit facility is subject to two financial covenants, total debt to EBITDA and EBITDA to Interest Expense (as defined in the credit agreement). The applicable thresholds are 3.75x for the total debt to EBITDA test and 3.0x for the EBITDA to Interest Expense, and as of June 30, 2013, the applicable measures as 2.9x and 4.7x, respectively, indicating reasonable cushion. Covenant compliance is not expected to restrict access to the revolving credit facility over the next several quarters.

Structural Considerations
RR Donnelley is an operating company that also holds equity interests in various other operating companies. The company's non-debt liabilities reside both at RR Donnelley and a number of its subsidiaries, while all rated debts reside solely at RR Donnelley. The revolving credit facility benefits from secured up-stream guarantees from various operating subsidiaries. However, since the $1.15 billion revolving facility is small relative to the company's $3.4 billion pool of unsecured notes, and with advantageous access to realization proceeds and ample value coverage, its rating is three notches higher, Baa2, than the company's Ba2 CFR. Reciprocally, the relatively small size of the revolving credit facility leaves sufficient residual value covering the senior unsecured pool that its rating is only one notch below the CFR at Ba3.

Rating Outlook
Given the potential of a change in management's de-leveraging commitment as well as accelerating declines in the broadly-defined commercial printing industry, the outlook is negative.

What Could Change the Rating - Up
Presuming stronger industry fundamentals and solid liquidity, positive outlook or ratings actions could result from Moody's-adjusted free cash flow-to-Debt (FCF/TD) to increasing on a sustainable basis into the 10%-to- 15% range. At that level of FCF, Moody's-adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA would likely be in the 3.0x-to-3.5x range. Given adverse systemic influences, the negative ratings outlook, and with recent measures at a significant discount to the upgrade guidance measures (estimated 2012 FCF/TD is 5.9%; Debt-to-EBITDA is 4.4x), an upgrade over the next couple of years is unlikely.

What Could Change the Rating - Down
Interruption of delivering towards 3.75x Moody's-adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA by 2015 could result in a CFR downgrade, as would adverse liquidity developments, a downwards revision in existing financial guidance or a more than 2.5% decrease in annual organic revenue.

Rating Factors
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company Global Publishing Industry [1][2] Factor 1: Scale and Diversity (25%) Current LTM 6/30/2013 Measure Score

[3]Moody's 12-18 month Forward
View* As of August 2013

a) Consolidated Revenue (USD

$10.3

A

$10.1 - $10.2

A

Billions) b) Market Position: Content and Services c) Business and Geographic Diversity
Factor 2: Operating Performance and Volatility (17.5%)

Ba Ba

Ba Ba

Ba Ba

a) Consolidated Revenue Growth vs. Nominal GDP b) Revenue Volatility
Factor 3: Financial Policy and Event (10%)

B Baa Ba 4.4x 8.8% 2.6x B B B Ba3 4.0x - 4.3x 5% - 6% 2x - 3x

Ba Baa Ba B B B Ba3 Ba2

a) Financial Policy and Event Risk
Factor 4: Financial Strength (47.5%)

a) Debt / EBITDA b) Free cash flow / Debt c) (EBITDA-CapEx) / Interest
Rating:

a) Weighted Average Factor Result b) Actual Rating Assigned

[1] All ratios are calculated using Moody's Standard Accounting Adjustments. [2] Based on financial data as of 6/30/2013(L); Source: Moody's Financial Metrics [3] This represents Moody's forward view; not the view of the issuer; and unless noted in the text, does not incorporate significant acquisitions and divestitures

© 2014 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATION") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER

DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER

OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Does It Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings

...for bond ratings? Historical evidence$ John (Xuefeng) Jiang a,n, Mary Harris Stanford b, Yuan Xie c a Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, N252 Business Complex, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA M. J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA c Fordham University, 441E Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, USA b a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 12 December 2010 Received in revised form 13 July 2011 Accepted 9 August 2011 Available online 7 April 2012 JEL classification: G18 G20 G28 Keywords: Credit ratings Investor pay Issuer pay Moody’s S&P abstract We test whether Standard and Poor’s (S&P) assigns higher bond ratings after it switches from investor-pay to issuer-pay fees in 1974. Using Moody’s rating for the same bond as a benchmark, we find that when S&P charges investors and Moody’s charges issuers, S&P’s ratings are lower than Moody’s. Once S&P adopts issuer-pay, its ratings increase and no longer differ from Moody’s. More importantly, S&P only assigns higher ratings for bonds that are subject to greater conflicts of interest, measured by higher expected rating fees or lower credit quality. These findings suggest that the issuer-pay model leads to higher ratings. & 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction This paper investigates whether charging bond issuers for credit ratings leads to higher ratings. The three major credit rating agencies—Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s Investor Service...

Words: 13947 - Pages: 56

Premium Essay

Manager

...Rating Action: Moody's assigns ratings to Chrysler refinancing; Ba1 to first lien term loan and B1 to second lien notes. Outlook is stable. Global Credit Research - 29 Jan 2014 Approximately $5 billion of obligations rated New York, January 29, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service assigned ratings to debt securities being offered by Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler) in connection with the refinancing of $4.7 billion of VEBA trust note. Ratings assigned are: Ba1 to $2 billion of new first-lien term loans that rank pari passu with the company's existing $2.9 billion in outstanding term loans (also rated Ba1) and B1 to $2.7 billion of second-lien secured notes that rank pari passu with the company's $3.2 billion in outstanding second-lien notes (also rated B1). Proceeds will be used to refinance $4.7 billion in outstanding VEBA trust note. The company's B1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR), B1-PD Probability of Default Rating, and SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity ratings are unaffected. The rating outlook is stable. RATINGS RATIONALE The assignment of the new Chrysler ratings recognizes that the transaction is a refinancing that will not materially change the company's level of outstanding debt. Benefits from the transaction will include a meaningful reduction in interest expense as the VEBA notes carry an effective interest rate of 11.7%. The interest rate on the new offerings will be considerably lower. However, the newly-offered obligations will have a shorter maturity profile compared...

Words: 2381 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Moody's Rating

...CORPORATES RATING METHODOLOGY Global Pharmaceutical Industry Summary This rating methodology explains Moody’s approach to assessing credit risk for companies in the pharmaceutical industry globally. This document is intended to provide general guidance that helps companies, investors, and other interested market participants understand how key qualitative and quantitative risk characteristics are likely to affect rating outcomes for companies in the pharmaceutical industry. This document does not include an exhaustive treatment of all factors that are reflected in Moody’s ratings but should enable the reader to understand the qualitative considerations and financial information and ratios that are usually most important for ratings in this sector. This rating methodology replaces 1 the Global Pharmaceutical Industry Methodology published in October 2009. While reflecting many of the same core principles as the 2009 document, this update provides a more transparent presentation of the rating considerations that are usually most important for companies in this sector and incorporates refinements in our analysis that better reflect key credit fundamentals of the industry. No rating changes will result from publication of this rating methodology. This report includes a detailed rating grid and illustrative mapping examples that compare historical performance on factors in the grid to ratings of companies covered by this methodology. The purpose of the rating grid is to provide...

Words: 13613 - Pages: 55

Premium Essay

The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in the 2008 Financial Crisis

...credit rating agencies such as Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s in promoting well-functioning capital markets. How well are the agencies performing their roles?” – December 2013 past paper Credit rating agencies are private profit oriented entities that earn revenues for issuing opinions on the credit worthiness of sovereign governments, corporations and a variety of specific debt issues and issuers. They enjoy a high level of credibility in the investment community and their opinions are extremely influential. Credit rating agencies first emerged in the United States in 1909. They initially issued ratings solely for the debt obligations of the railroad, which had catalysed the development of a global bond market to finance their expansion. The advent of credit rating agencies in the early 20th Century reflected the emergence of highly capital intensive industries in the USA and the corresponding expansion of capital markers to finance them. Over recent decades, global capital flows have accelerated as sovereign borrowers, notably in the developing world, turn to private capital markets for financing needs previously met by commercial and development banks, as well as multilateral agencies. The two major credit rating agencies are Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Corporation. Standard and Poor’s is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the McGraw Hill Group of companies,, while Moody’s Corporation is the parent company of Moody’s Investor Services. Credit rating agencies...

Words: 1385 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Rating Agencies and Financial Crisis

...Table of content: 1) Introduction 2) Rating agency: * Who are rating agencies? * Development of the rating agencies * Function of rating agencies * The procedure of rating assignment * Solicited method * Unsolicited method * Sovereign rating * Rating scale and definition * Advantages of credit rating * Disadvantages of credit rating 3) Rating agencies and companies: * Failures of rating agencies * Reasons for the mistakes of rating agencies 4) Rating agencies and states: * Background * History of Italian rating * Critics against Italian rating 5) How to improve the rating: * “Issuer pays” or “Investor pays” * Public funding of rating * Government rating agency * Increase of competition * Liability of CRAs 6) Conclusion 7) references Introduction: The history of the Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) is well represented through a parabolic trend. Before 1960 CRAs were quite famous only in the USA, later on their importance have increased in all the world until the recent crisis, in which they reached their highest level; whereupon they have been loosing power. Credit Rating Agencies are: an independent company that evaluates the financial condition of issuers of debt instruments and then assigns a rating that reflects its assessment of the issuer's ability to make the debt payments. An important key to understand the future of the thesis concerns the...

Words: 2909 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Credit Risk

...IDENTITY CARD NO. : 3505543 NAME : GEORGE S. OGUTU CONTACT : P. O. BOX 11873-00400, NAIROBI. CELL PHONE : 0722 736 054 OCCUPATION : CIVIL SERVANT EMPLOYER : GOVERNMENT OF KENYA, MINISTRY OF ROADS DISTRICT : SIAYA LOCATION : USONGA SUB-LOCATION : USONGA VILLAGE : NYANDORERA RESIDENCE : RONGAI STATES: I am the above mentioned male adult Kenyan of the above given address, aged 52years. I am employed by the Government of Kenya, Ministry of Roads as a Technologist based in Nairobi’s Industrial Area. I am the owner and Policy Holder of Motor Vehicle Registration Number KAA 572R Nissan Sunny Saloon. I had insured the said Vehicle with M/S Gate-way Insurance Company ** policy Number 010/070/1/140134/2008/11. The cover which was on display as on 1st September, 2012 was valued from 14th November, 2009 to expire on 13th November, 2012. I wish to state as follows:- I do recall that on the 1st day of September, 2012, I gave my vehicle to Keziah Ogutu who is my young sister. She was to use the vehicle to go to her office. At about 8.00 am, she called me and informed me that she had been involved in an accident along Mombasa Road at Bellevue while driving to her office. She further told me that a Pedestrian ran on the road when she collided with the vehicle. She told me that the Pedestrian sustained injuries. I then rushed to the scene and found the Police at the scene. The victim had already been removed from the scene and taken to hospital by an ambulance. After Police...

Words: 3863 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Credit Management

...How did increased competition affect credit ratings? Bo Becker Todd Milbourn Working Paper 09-051 Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010 by Bo Becker and Todd Milbourn Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. How did increased competition affect credit ratings? Draft Date: September 15, 2010 Bo Becker and Todd Milbourn* Abstract. The credit rating industry has historically been dominated by just two agencies, Moody’s and S&P, leading to longstanding legislative and regulatory calls for increased competition. The material entry of a third rating agency (Fitch) to the competitive landscape offers a unique experiment to empirically examine how in fact increased competition affects the credit ratings market. Increased competition from Fitch coincides with lower quality ratings from the incumbents: rating levels went up, the correlation between ratings and market-implied yields fell, and the ability of ratings to predict default deteriorated. We offer several possible explanations for these findings that are linked to existing theories. Key words: Credit ratings; competition and reputation; information quality * Harvard Business School (Becker) and Washington University in St Louis (Milbourn). Contact author’s e-mail address: bbecker@hbs.edu. We wish to thank Pierluigi Balduzzi...

Words: 19527 - Pages: 79

Free Essay

Sovereign Credit Ratings

...credit ratings An assessment of sovereign ratings provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Authors: Joep Pennartz, Jan Pieter Snoeij The views expressed in this paper are their own and not necessarily those of Rabobank. Contact: Joep Pennartz and Jan Pieter Snoeij wrote this working paper as a part of an internship at Rabobank. For further information please contact their supervisor at Rabobank’s Economic Research Department: S.A.Kamalodin@rn.rabobank.nl Editors: Allard Bruinshoofd, head of International Economic Research Shahin Kamalodin, economist 1 “There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There’s the United States and there’s Moody’s Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody’s can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it’s not clear sometimes who’s more powerful.” (Friedman, 1996). Introduction Credit rating agencies (CRAs) are of major importance in international financial markets. Their prominence is explained by the myriad number of traded fixed income securities; one simply cannot assume that every market participant has the resources to assess the credit risk of each borrower. That is where CRAs step in; they distil public and private information into a simple credit rating. The informative value of these credit ratings lowers information asymmetries and enhances transparency and liquidity (Katz, Salinas, & Stephanou, 2009; IMF, 2010). Furthermore, credit ratings facilitate ...

Words: 9256 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Loan Default Rate

...INFRASTRUCTURE SPECIAL COMMENT Default and Recovery Rates for Project Finance Bank Loans, 1983–2010 1. Introduction 1 2 4 7 12 14 15 28 37 37 39 60 60 Table of Contents: 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SUMMARY 3. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT FINANCE INDUSTRY 4. DATA AND METHODOLOGY 5. DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECTS 6. DISTRIBUTION OF DEFAULTS 7. DEFAULT RATE ANALYSIS 8. RECOVERY ANALYSIS 9. FURTHER ANALYSIS OF TIME TO DEFAULT AND TIME TO EMERGENCE BY INDUSTRY 10. EXPOSURE AT DEFAULT APPENDICES MOODY’S RELATED RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Analyst Contacts: NEW YORK 1.212.553.1653 This Special Comment (the “Study”) is an update to Moody’s initial study published in October 2010 (the “Initial Study”) examining the default and recovery performance of project finance bank loans. The Study documents Moody’s updated analysis of historical project finance bank loan default and recovery rates using updated and expanded aggregate data (the “Study Data Set”) from a consortium of leading sector lenders (together, the “Bank Group”). Moody’s wishes to acknowledge and thank each of the banks in the Bank Group for supporting and contributing to the Study. This Special Comment is an abridged version of a more comprehensive study undertaken on behalf of the Bank Group. The updated Study Data Set includes 3,533 projects which account for some 51% of all project finance transactions originated globally during a 27 year period from January 1, 1983 to December 31, 2010. The Study Data Set is a statistically robust data...

Words: 25909 - Pages: 104

Premium Essay

Cases in Financial Management

...interpreting a firm’s financial data and strategic plans; • Enhance your critical thinking and problem solving skills; • Expand your understanding of financial theory and its application; • Improve your listening and cooperative learning skills. II. Learning Promises At the end of this course your will be able to… • Think like a financial manager; • Interpret a company’s financial health by evaluating the performance of its cash flow components and financial ratios; • Create financial forecasts with different scenarios; • Justify the acceptance or rejection of a loan based on credit analysis: • Learn to interpret loan covenants and the underlying collateral; • Discover the metrics that Moody’s uses to identify credit risk changes; • Explain how management...

Words: 5389 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

The Ratings Agencies

...* Annexes Annexes I I. Grille de Notation des agences Moody's, Fitch et S&P I II. Principales acquisitions des trois grandes agences depuis 2000 II III. Accords de Bâle II - Pondération des actifs bancaires III IV. Grèce : Décisions des instances internationales et impact sur le taux à 10 ans IV V. Répartition des notations souverains par catégorie et par répartition géographique V VI. Evolution du Résultat Opérationnel des 3 grandes agences VI VII. Nombre d'émetteurs corporate notés par Moody's par catégories de note VII VIII. La crise de la dette expliquée aux nuls VIII IX. Les agences de notation decryptées XIV Grille de Notation des agences Moody's, Fitch et S&P Moody's | S&P | Fitch | | | Long Terme | Court Terme | Long Terme | Court Terme | Long Terme | Court Terme | Signification de la note | Catégories | Aaa | P-1 | AAA | A-1+ | AAA | F1+ | Prime | INVESTISSEMENT | Aa1 | | AA+ | | AA+ | | High Grade | | Aa2 | | AA | | AA | | | | Aa3 | | AA- | | AA- | | | | A1 | | A+ | A-1 | A+ | F1 | Upper Medium Grade | | A2 | | A | | A | | | | A3 | P-2 | A- | A-2 | A- | F2 | | | Baa1 | | BBB+ | | BBB+ | | Lower Medium Grade | | Baa2 | P-3 | BBB | A-3 | BBB | F3 | | | Baa3 | | BBB- | | BBB- | | | | Ba1 | / | BB+ | B | BB+ | B | Speculative | SPECULATIF | Ba2 | | BB | | BB | | | | Ba3 | | BB- | | BB- | | | | B1 | | B+ | | B+ | | Highly Speculative | | B2 | |...

Words: 2971 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Marketing5000

...Chapter 7 Interest Rates and Bond Valuation Bond Features Bond - evidence of debt issued by a corporation or a governmental body. A bond represents a loan made by investors to the issuer. In return for his/her money, the investor receives a legaI claim on future cash flows of the borrower. The issuer promises to: Make regular coupon payments every period until the bond matures, and Pay the face/par/maturity value of the bond when it matures. Default - since the above mentioned promises are contractual obligations, an issuer who fails to keep them is subject to legal action on behalf of the lenders (bondholders). Bond Value = Present Value of the Coupons + Present Value of the Face Value Bond Value = INT [1 – (1/(1 + rd)N)]/rd + M * 1/(1 + rd)N where: INT = the promised coupon payment M = the promised face value N = number of periods until the bond matures rd = the market’s required return, YTM If a bond has five years to maturity, an $80 annual coupon, and a $1000 face value, its cash flows would look like this: Time 0 1 2 3 4 5 Coupons $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 Face Value $ 1000 Market Price $____ How much is this bond worth? It depends on the level of current market interest rates. If the going rate on bonds like this one is 10%...

Words: 2132 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Dim Sum Bonds

...DIVERSIFICATION OF ISSUERS THE “DIM-SUM SUBSTITUTE”: SYNTHETIC RENMINBI BONDS 6 6 7 9 This report addresses recent developments in the offshore market for bonds denominated in mainland China’s currency, the Renminbi (RMB), whether settled in RMB or another currency. Called “dim sum” bonds when settled in RMB or “synthetic” if settled in other currencies such as U.S. dollars, these debt instruments have so far come out primarily in Hong Kong, with several synthetic convertible bonds in Singapore. However, in future, Chinese authorities may allow offshore RMB transactions elsewhere, and more euro-RMB bonds1 issued in other financial centers could soon appear. A comment answering investors’ frequently asked questions on our approach to rating both types of these bonds will follow within a few weeks. The progressive internationalization of the RMB will facilitate growth in Hong Kong of both kinds of RMB-denominated bonds. In particular, the rapidly expanding volume of the city’s deposits and of trade settlements in RMB has driven growth in dim-sum bonds, and the Chinese government’s allowance last week for Chinese enterprises to settle direct overseas investment in RMB will catalyze this trend. However, the market is still at an early stage, and evolving regulations for RMB business in Hong Kong will determine the speed and sustainability of its growth. A diversification in the types of issuers and issuances for dim-sum bonds has already occurred, with corporate-bond tenors of...

Words: 4815 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Dsds

...Commercial Paper Thomas K. Hahn C ommercial paper is a short-term unsecured promissory note issued by corporations and foreign governments. For many large, creditworthy issuers, commercial paper is a low-cost alternative to bank loans. Issuers are able to efficiently raise large amounts of funds quickly and without expensive Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration by selling paper, either directly or through independent dealers, to a large and varied pool of institutional buyers. Investors in commercial paper earn competitive, market-determined yields in notes whose maturity and amounts can be tailored to their specific needs. Because of the advantages of commercial paper for both investors and issuers, commercial paper has become one of America’s most important debt markets. Commercial paper outstanding grew at an annual rate of 14 percent from 1970 to 1991. Figure 1 shows commercial paper outstanding, which totaled $528 billion at the end of 1991. This article describes some of the important features of the commercial paper market. The first section reviews the characteristics of commercial paper. The second section describes the major participants in the market, including the issuers, investors, and dealers. The third section discusses the risks faced by investors in the commercial paper market along with the mechanisms that are used to control these risks. The fourth section discusses some recent innovations, including asset-backed commercial...

Words: 9131 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Financial Reporting One

...Financial Reporting Project: CVS Health Corporation and Walgreens, Co. Financial Reporting Project: CVS Health Corporation and Walgreens, Co. Progress report two CHRISTOPHER ALLEN, SYED BOKHARI, GAELLE DENIZE, AND JONATHAN PLANTE Progress report two CHRISTOPHER ALLEN, SYED BOKHARI, GAELLE DENIZE, AND JONATHAN PLANTE 2015 2015 Table of Contents Module 4 Questions………………………………………………..pages 2-3 Module 6 Questions………………………………………………..page 3 Module 7 Questions………………………………………………..pages 4-5 Module 8 Questions………………………………………………..page 5-6 Accompanying Exhibits to Module 4……………………………...pages 7-9 Module 5 Questions (Exhibits six through eight)……………….....pages 9-11 Accompanying Exhibits to Module 6……………………………...pages 11-12 Accompanying Exhibits to Module 7……………………………...pages 12-14 Proxy Statement Questions………………………………………...page 15 Works Cited……………...………………………………………...pages 16-17 Return on Equity, Analysis, including the analysis of Operating and Non-operating Return (for a detailed analysis, please refer to Exhibit One, Two, and Three) In the fiscal years of 2012 and 2013, Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) had a higher return on equity (ROE) than did CVS; however, in 2014, CVS had a higher ROE than did WBA. (CVS and WBA 10-Ks) Both components of ROE (operating and non-operating) explain this above information. For the fiscal years of 2012 and 2013, WBA had a higher operating return, which is also called return on net operating assets (RNOA), than did...

Words: 3567 - Pages: 15