Premium Essay

Change - Kotter's 8 Step Modell Applied to Government Contracting Out

In:

Submitted By top00323
Words 4467
Pages 18
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page
Executive Summary …………………………..…………………………………………..… 3
Change: Kotter’s 8 Step Model Applied to Government’s Contracting Out
1. Contracting-Out Defined in Government Agencies……………………………..….. 4
2. Initial Acceptance of Change………… urgency (Step #1)….…..…………………... 4
3. Attempted Resistance of Change. Form a Powerful Coalition (Step #2) …………….…..5
4. Benefits of Government Contracting Out…………………………..…………….…. 5
5. Who benefits from government contracting out?. Create a Vision for Change (Step #3) .. 6
6. What is the method by which contracts are awarded?……………………………..….. 6
a. Competitive Bidding Contracts……… ……………………………………...… 7
b. Sole Sourcing …………………………..…………………………………...…. 7
c. Set aside Government Contracting……………………………...………..……. 7
1. Women-Owned Small Business………………………………………….…. 8
2. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)………......… 9
3. Veteran –Owned Small Business (VSOB)……………………………….…. 9
4. Small Business (SB)………………………………………………………... 10
5. Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) ………….……….…10
6. Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB)…………………………….……........10
7. Small Disadvantaged Business 8(a) Certified [8(a)] Communicate the Vision (Step #4)………………………………………..……….10
7. What additional steps have been taken to encourage Federal agencies' use of WOSB, SDVSOB & VSOB?...................... remove the obstacles (Step #5)…......................................................11
8. Road blocks to fulfilling the allotted contractual goals, are they real or perceived?...remove the barriers……………13, Create Short-term Win (Step

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Change - Kotter's 8 Step Modell Applied to Government Contracting Out

...Land Use in Pinchot Latonia Ross SCI 207: Dependence of Man on the Environment Jeff Kingsbury April 16, 2012 LAB QUESTIONS In the lab questions below, report your answers in the format of a scientific report: introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusions and management recommendations. Click here for a tip sheet about writing scientific reports. Introduction 1. What is the question that this study aimed to answer? State the hypothesis that you tested. This study aims to answer the question of whether 25%, 50%, OR 75% fragmentation will be sustainable for Pinchot’s forest in terms of sustaining its biodiversity and ecosystem services. It is hypothesized that neither 50% nor 75% fragmentation will protect the reserve’s biodiversity and ecosystem services. Methods 2. Briefly describe the methods of data collection and analysis you used to test your hypothesis. What scientific procedure did you follow to answer your question and test your hypothesis? I first started the experiment at 0% fragmentation and increased it by 25%, 50%, and 75% adding each species such as SFG, BBWF, Elk and wolves to each fragmentation level of the forest to show the effect each species would have on the forest ecosystem as the level increased. Results 3. Look at your results table. What were impacts of fragmentation on each species’ population numbers when all four were present? Do you accept or reject your hypothesis? Support your answer with reference...

Words: 1170 - Pages: 5