...Carbonated Soft Drink Industry Analysis A framework, known as the five forces model, was created by Michael E. Porter to assist managers with identifying opportunities and threats within an industry by analyzing the competitive forces. His five forces consist of: the risk of entry by potential competitors, the intensity of rivalry among established companies within an industry, the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, and the closeness of substitutes to an industry’s products. The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) Industry will be thoroughly analyzed using Porter’s Five Forces. Risk of Entry by Potential Competitors With high barriers to entry, the risk of potential competitors entering into the CSD industry is low. The high cost of developing a manufacturing plant in order to meet demand is a barrier that makes the risk of entry low. Coke and Pepsi have spent numerous amounts of money to gain the brand loyalty of their customers. Because brand loyalty is already established in the CSD industry, the risk of competitors entering is lowered. Due to brand loyalty, both Coke and Pepsi have a high demand for their products. Both companies are able to produce in mass quantities and lower the variable cost for each product. With the variable cost being lowered, they are able to lower their selling price. Another barrier that lowers the risk of entry is franchise agreements that Coke and Pepsi have made with their bottlers. The agreements state that...
Words: 852 - Pages: 4
...investigates the strategic management of Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola in an effort to make recommendations on how Pepsi Cola can build strategies in gaining a larger share of the market. The assessment of strategic management begins with the vision and mission of both organizations, which leads into literature review that identifies the consumer preferences of both Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola. Following the literature review is the teams’ own personal assessment of consumer preferences for the Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola brand (Please refer to Appendix A for the assessment). Finalizing the investigation are recommendations for Pepsi Cola to gain a larger share of the market. The Cola Wars Research Paper According to an industry report from Hoover’s (2014), the U.S. soft drink industry yields $34 billion annually and continues to grow internationally. The largest markets of consumption for soft drinks outside the U.S. are: Mexico, Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay (Hoover’s, 2014). The constant change of consumer preferences is what drives Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola to compete for a larger share of the market. The intense rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola have been going on since the late 1800’s (Economy Watch, 2011); when Pepsi Cola was born from a “combination of: carbonated water, kola nuts, vanilla, and rare oils” (Pepsi Legacy Book, p.7. 2005). This paper focuses on the diversified strategies of both Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola in their efforts to gain the largest share of...
Words: 6418 - Pages: 26
...Marketing Management Analysis of The Coca Cola Company® Team L4 [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] Ellen van Winkel Thamar Peper Annelieke Been Rozemarijn 561548 561526 561503 Barendsen, 552505 Marketing Management Block 1-2008 Date: 25 February 2008, Amsterdam To: Dr. L. Lin Mr. van der Rest Version 1 Chapter 1 Introduction We started this project with a choice, Coca Cola or Pepsi. We chose to analyze Coca Cola, we all preferred the brand image, and were eager to find out how Coca Cola is organized. The next step was determining what geographic location would be analyzed. We chose the United States, the soft drink capital. Soft drinks are invented in the United States, and has the highest consumption of soft drinks. After analyzing the Cola War Continues: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 we were able to state the problems in the case. These are divided into a main and several sub problems, that are stated below. Main problem: To analyse the case about the Cola War and the position of Coca-Cola a main problem is formulated. ‘What could coca cola do to remain its market position and stay ahead of its competitors?’ Sub problems: To finally give an answer to the main problem sub problems are...
Words: 14534 - Pages: 59
...Strengths With a company such as Coca-Cola they have both internal as well as external strengths. One such strength would be that it is a strong company as they are not only a $23 billion company but it also sells roughly 400 drink brands while holding the largest beverage market share of around forty percent (Bazil, M 2013). This company has also served more than 200 countries serving more than 1.7 billion servings a day (Bazil, M 2013).While Coca-Cola has not yet made an organic product, they do however own Odwalla being a natural juice company. Even though its product will not be marketed as their own brand however with Odwalla’s knowledge of natural juice making will indeed make to be an excellent strength for the Coca-Cola’s company. However one of the bigger strengths in which this company posses would be their brand loyalty in which their customers have. Therefore someone who drinks Coca-Cola will indeed choose the organic fruit juice over other competitors because it has the logo of Coca-Cola. Another strength this company has is its popularity as it is well known throughout the nation. It is a fact that Coca-Cola buys not only because of its incredible taste but also due to it being accepted nationwide. Due to Coca-Cola being able to sell all over the world it is a fact that more and more customers will therefore continue to buy what they know and love. Weaknesses As with any company Coca-Cola also has its downfalls but with limited weaknesses as there are...
Words: 1022 - Pages: 5
...Coca Cola Wars Case Analysis July 31, 2010 Executive Summary Coca-Cola was invented and marketed in 1886 by a pharmacist named Dr. John Pemberton he named Coca-Cola after the coca leaves and kola nuts he used in order to create the product. Twelve years later in 1898 Caleb Bradham created Pepsi Cola for the beneficial effects it claimed to have on upset stomachs and indigestion. The enmity between the two soda companies are known as the “Cola Wars”. The war began in the 1960’s when Coca-Cola’s supremacy ruled the market as the beverage of choice above Pepsi Cola. Due to the competition between the two rival cola companies actions became extreme and forced both companies to implement strategic methods in order to keep the competitive edge over the other. Coca Cola Wars Case Analysis I. Current Situation: Coca-Cola's and Pepsi Cola’s marketing strategies has been as impossible to tell apart as the products themselves, both companies rely on vibrant colors, catch phrases, attractive people, and famous entertainers to grab consumer’s attention and to entice them into purchasing their products. In 1941 Coca-Cola officially renamed their product to “Coke” as an official trademark with a series of advertisements informing consumers that “Coke” means Coca-Cola (Coca-Cola, 2011). Pepsi was first introduced as " Drink" in 1898 by Caleb Bradham its inventor who created Pepsi at his home, it was later that Bradham changed the name and officially named the beverage Pepsi...
Words: 3366 - Pages: 14
...CASE STUDY : COLA WARS CONTINUE : COKE AND PEPSI IN 2006 The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006” focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. ‘ Cola war’ is the term used to describe the campaign of mutually targeted television advertisement & marketing campaigns between Coke & Pepsi. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. Both Coke & Pepsi have segmented the soft drink industry into two divisions, via – 1.Production of soft drink syrup. 2.Manufacturing & distribution of soft drinks at retail level. Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed...
Words: 1192 - Pages: 5
...exceptional marketing programs and well as aggressive business strategies have become recognized the world around. Many of these are part of our everyday life and if not then we see them every day in our comings and goings. Two of these world-wide brands that many of us know are also extremely similar in both product as well as marketing strategy. Those two brands are The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. On May 8, 1886, a pharmacist named Dr. John Pemberton carried a jug of Coca-Cola syrup to Jacobs’ Pharmacy in downtown Atlanta, where it was mixed with carbonated water and sold for five cents a glass. (Our Heritage, 2012) Three years later in the summer of 1898 a young pharmacist named Caleb Bradham began experimenting with combinations of spices, juices and syrups, trying to create a refreshing new drink to serve to his customers. His success came in the form of the beverage now known around the world as Pepsi-Cola. (Pepsi Legacy, 2005) And from that day forward the rivalry between Coca-Cola and Pepsi would become legendary. These two beverage companies are competing for the top spot in a massive global market. The cola and carbonated beverage industry reaches to nearly every corner of the planet, and the vast majority of the market share belongs to the two giants Coke and Pepsi. With such a huge market and enormous revenue potential in an industry such as this, it is no wonder that the Coke versus Pepsi competition is so fierce. So how does either of these companies create an advantage...
Words: 6544 - Pages: 27
...Cola Wars Continue Coke vs Pepsi in 2010 Submitted by: Dinesh MR (13141) Submitted to: Prof. NR Govinda Sharma Case Description Carbonated soft drinks (CSD’s) are popular drinks constituting very attractive and profitable business for more than a century. This business is capital intensive and was and still dominated for long period by few giants who had patent rights and who gained very high brand recognition over the years. The competition between Coca Cola and Pepsi was very aggressive and caused the industry profitability to fluctuate up and down. The rivalry in this industry was fatal for small concentrate producers as well as small bottlers and lead to merging and acquisitions that left the industry controlled by big players of huge firms. Since the year 2000, the industry is facing a big challenge with the increase in the popularity of the non-CSD drinks especially with the multiple warnings issued by the health organizations against the carbonated soft drinks. With huge market size in US and worldwide, with few giants existing in the market for more than a century mainly Coca and Pepsi controlled more than 70% total of market share and constituted a duopoly market in this industry, with low product price, with perfect setup of the business, with vertical integration pattern and with the huge marketing campaigns that created strong brand names with high customer loyalty. Analysis through Porter’s Five Forces Model Barriers to Entry Barriers to entering...
Words: 3102 - Pages: 13
...Coca-Cola marketing channel strategy study in China Chapter Coca-Cola Company's development in China Section the basic situation of Coca-Cola Company 1. Coca-Cola and the company's produce Coca-Cola, the world's one hundred years the popularity of the wonderful liquid is from the United States in 1886 in Atlanta, Georgia pharmacist John Dr. Peng Bodun (John S. Pemberton) in the backyard at home, will Carbonated water and sugar and other ingredients mixed in a triangle pot in the invention. "Coca-Cola" is the English name was Pemberton's assistant and partner in accountant named Robinson. Robinson is a classical calligrapher, he considered that 'the two capital C character will look great', so he had to personally write cursive scripts using Spencer's 'Coca-Cola'. 'coca' is the son of refined spices cocoa leaves, 'cola' is the fruit of the cocoa component removed. "Coca-Cola" trademark has not changed over the past century. In 1892, businessman Hom Chandler in 2300 U.S. dollars to buy all the secrets of Coca-Cola franchise, and the creation of Coca-Cola Company. Under his leadership, less than three years Bianba Coca-Cola extended to across the country. In 1899, Benjamin Franklin Thomas andղķʿ??̘ Whitehead signed with the Candler regional development in the United States most of the bottling business contracts. Since then its development momentum will be unstoppable in 1904 developed into a 120 bottling...
Words: 3232 - Pages: 13
...Analysis of The Coca Cola Company® Team L4 [pic] [pic] [pic] [pic] Ellen van Winkel Thamar Peper Annelieke Been Rozemarijn 561548 561526 561503 Barendsen, 552505 Marketing Management Block 1-2008 Date: 25 February 2008, Amsterdam To: Dr. L. Lin Mr. van der Rest Version 1 Chapter 1 Introduction We started this project with a choice, Coca Cola or Pepsi. We chose to analyze Coca Cola, we all preferred the brand image, and were eager to find out how Coca Cola is organized. The next step was determining what geographic location would be analyzed. We chose the United States, the soft drink capital. Soft drinks are invented in the United States, and has the highest consumption of soft drinks. After analyzing the Cola War Continues: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 we were able to state the problems in the case. These are divided into a main and several sub problems, that are stated below. Main problem: To analyse the case about the Cola War and the position of Coca-Cola a main problem is formulated. ‘What could coca cola do to remain its market position and stay ahead of its competitors?’ Sub problems: To finally give an answer to the main problem sub problems are needed. They will help to find answers to different segments in the case. These answers to the sub problems together will provide the answer to the main problem. The sub problems can be arranged under different headings and are as follows: What lies in the future of Coca-Cola? • What are the...
Words: 290 - Pages: 2
...For the exclusive use of R. PONCE 9-702-442 REV: JANUARY 27, 2004 DAVID B. YOFFIE Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century For over a century, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola vied for “throat share” of the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60-billion industry in the United States, where the average American consumed 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a “carefully waged competitive struggle,” from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual growth of around 10% as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption consistently rose. According to Roger Enrico, former CEO of Pepsi-Cola: The warfare must be perceived as a continuing battle without blood. Without Coke, Pepsi would have a tough time being an original and lively competitor. The more successful they are, the sharper we have to be. If the Coca-Cola company didn’t exist, we’d pray for someone to invent them. And on the other side of the fence, I’m sure the folks at Coke would say that nothing contributes as much to the present-day success of the Coca-Cola company than . . . Pepsi.1 This cozy relationship was threatened in the late 1990s, however, when U.S. CSD consumption dropped for two consecutive years and worldwide shipments slowed for both Coke and Pepsi. In response, both firms began to modify their bottling, pricing, and brand strategies. They also looked to emerging international markets to fuel...
Words: 13837 - Pages: 56
...This report is based upon the information from the Harvard business case: “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century”. Both Coca Cola Company and PepsiCo are the largest players in the Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) industry. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in a ‘Nash Equilibrium’. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The scope of this report covers not only on the increase of overall market share, but also finding new opportunities in unrevealed markets. The analysis is also based upon the eight key concept model. In addition the PEST-analysis and the five forces model of Porter is also utilized to gain insight into the ‘macro-environment’ and ‘meso-environment’ 1. Analysis The eight key concepts analysis is applied to identify the key issues with regard to both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The outcome of the analysis is utilized to establish the new strategy for both companies. The key issues for each concept are described in this paragraph. Direction The mission and vision of the two companies, described in the case, differ on one major issue. The Coca-Cola Company direction limits its market to a product portfolio of beverage brands, whereas PepsiCo does not only focus...
Words: 3313 - Pages: 14
...The Coca – Cola Company struggles with Ethical Crises Coca-cola has the most valuable brand name in the world and, one of the most visible companies worldwide, has a tremendous opportunity to excel in all dimensions of business performance. However, over the last ten years, the firm has struggled to reach its financial objectives and has been associated with a number of ethical crises. Warren Buffet served as a member of the board of directors and was a strong supporter and investor of Coca-Cola but resigned from the board in 2006 after several years of frustration with Coca-Cola’s failure to overcome many challenges. Many issues were facing Doug Ivester when he took over the reins at Coca-Cola in 1997. Ivester was heralded for his ability to handle the financial flows and details of the soft drink giant. Former CEO Robert Goizueta had carefully groomed Ivester for the top position that he assumed in October 1997 after Goizueta’s untimely death. However, Ivester seemed to lack leadership in handling a series of ethical crises, causing some to doubt the “Big Red’s” reputation and its prospects for the future. For a company with a rich history of marketing prowess and financial performance, Ivester’s departure in 1999 represented a high-profile glitch on a relatively clean record in one hundred years of business. In 2000 Doug Daft, the company’s former president and chief operating officer, replaced Ivester as the new CEO. Daft’s tenure was rocky, and the company was allegedly...
Words: 4255 - Pages: 18
...9/8/2015 PGDM/MBA Material: Case Study- Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century www.mbapgdmstuff.blogspot.com Home Human Resource Marketing Information system management Images You are visitor # Case Study- Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century 110,588 Search This Blog Translate Select Language ▼ Category Assignment Business Communication Business Environment Business Law Case Study Compensation MAnagement E- Business Summary: "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the 21st Century” explains the economics of the soft drink industry and its relation with profits, taking into account all stages of the value chain of the soft drink industry. By focusing on the war between Coca‐Cola and PepsiCo as market leaders in this industry – with a 90% market share in carbonated beverages – the study analyses the different stages of the value chain (concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, suppliers) and the impact of the modern times and globalization on competition and interaction in the industry. Analysis: It is quite clear that there was a “war" between Coca‐Cola and PepsiCo: not only have they been rivals for entrepreneurship For your Information Formates Human Resource Management Human Resource Mangement Human resource Planning Indian Labour Law Industrial Relation Information system Management International Marketing ...
Words: 1069 - Pages: 5
...Econ Case Analysis Cola Wars Continue – HBR 702442 History of the Cola Wars For decades, Pepsi and Coca Cola fought over the market share of the soft drink industry. Throughout this almost duopolistic competition, Coke’s share grew from 33.4% in the 1960s to 44.5% in the late 90s; while Pepsi’s market share grew from 20.4% to 31.4% in the same time span. Although there are other potential firms in the market with considerable market influence such as Schweppes and Royal Crown, Pepsi and Coca-Cola remains the two most powerful giants in the soft drink industry. The Cola war began in the 1950s when former Coca-Cola marketing executive Alfred Steele made “beat coke” his theme as new CEO of Pepsi. In the early periods, both companies initiated marketing campaigns that differentiated itself from the competitor, such as Pepsi’s “Pepsi Challenge” and Coke’s “America’s Preferred Taste”. Throughout time, both Coca Cola and Pepsi experimented with new cola and non-cola flavors and introduced new lines of products such as Fanta, Mountain Dew, etc. Pepsi even diversified into the non-soft drink industries and merged with Frito-Lay. The merger claimed synergies based on shared customer targets. In the 1960s, Coke’s focus was primarily on the overseas market while Pepsi’s focused its attention on the domestic market which doubled its market share between 1950s and 1970s. The competition heated up in the 1980s when both companies increased their marketing budget and introduced new...
Words: 673 - Pages: 3
