Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Submitted By
Words 561
Pages 3
What is the most efficient use of power? A strong central government, where little to no power goes to the people, or one where all the power goes to the people and very little power goes to the government? For most people the first option is their own personal nightmares whereas the latter is their ideal. The Federalists want to have a system of power where most power goes to the government and is favorable by the wealthy, well-educated men. The Anti-Federalists are in favor of a system of power where most power goes to the people. This option is favored by farmers. The Antifederalists appeals to the ordinary man, whereas the Federalists appeals to the 1% of the population that own land. The thought process of the Antifederalists appeal more to the common colonist. First, the Antifederalists want to not ratify the Constitution, but rather dd a Bill Of Rights. Led by the greatest colonist minds of Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, and James Winthrop, son of John Winthrop (Antifederalists). The anti-federalists want a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of the people and oppose the ratification of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights are a list of rights that they believe should be accessible to everyone, however rich or poor they were. …show more content…
George Mason, a delegate to the Philadelphia Convention, had been quoted that the Constitution was “totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the state governments." (Antifederalists). The states to have no power was something the Antifederalists oppose to and are very vocal about. George was also quoted saying he’d “rather chop of my right hand than put it on the Constitution as it now stands.”

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

...As they were trying to put together the Constitution, America divided into two sections, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who supported the Constitution and those who opposed the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists. Even though the Anti-Federalist could not prevent ratification as the Federalist triumphed, they were able to amend the Constitution which included the Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalist believed a national government threatened liberties, rights and gave the federal government too much power; therefore, they felt each state should have the right to decide its own laws. In addition, they felt America was too large for the government to understand the concerns of each state and its...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

...The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two different groups that worked on the Articles of Confederation, and together created what is now our Constitution. This wasn’t an easy task to accomplish, there were many debates in order to create this document. To create the Constitution, 55 delegates met together at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to discuss how to adjust the Articles of Confederation to the new, developing country. Due to the “weaknesses” that presented itself within the Articles of Confederation, many delegates were split into two groups; one was the Federalists, which consisted of prominent businessmen, the second group was the Anti-Federalists, which consisted mostly of farmers and workers. The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were: 1. Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of the size of the state 2....

Words: 849 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists

...The Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy can be very nerve racking, especially when picking a side. Both sides offer their fair laws but they still struggle to have a fair amount of laws. Federalist and Anti-federalist have been head to head as if trying to win a race about who is better but in the end it’s all up to Americans and what we decide. Personally, I have decided to stick to Federalist based on the laws they offer. On the Federalist side the government is has greater power than under the Articles of Confederation. Although the power is limited it still benefits greatly to Americans instead of the Anti-Federalist power which would have to tax citizens. One great benefit from the Federalist’s is the power allowing states to...

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Anti-Federalists Compare And Contrast Essay

...the American government turning into something similar. The Constitution could’ve ended their fear or heightened it. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers were fundamental to ratifying the Constitution because they reminded people of the corruption they had endured and it led to the Bill of Rights despite having more difficult and uncommonly used language. The Federalist and Anti-Federalists had strong arguments for each of their arguments. Both sides claimed that people will pretend to be something they’re not to get the vote...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

His 301 Wk 2 Wksht

...University of Phoenix Material Influences on the Constitution Table Complete each section below. Include citations for your sources. |Documents |Summary |What was its influence on the Constitution? | |Magna Carta |Written in 1215, the document was a series of written promises |The magna carta served as the first piece of legislature attempting to keep the | | |that the King would rule England and deal with the people |rights for the people fair. The Americans saw it and read about it and decided it | | |fairly according to feudal law. It was an attempt by the barons|was time America had “higher law” ideas and design a document to give the people | | |to stop the king from becoming an oppressor more than a ruler. |rights and to protect them from oppression, such as the people during the time of | | | |the magna carta were suffering. | |Mayflower Compact |The mayflower compact served as the document needed to keep the|Much like the magna carta, the mayflower compact was put into...

Words: 1671 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Comparing Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

...This essay is going to compare and contrast both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, They both had some major differences, but other things they had the same thought process. Many things were different about their beliefs with the role and nature of the newly created United States government. Hamilton mainly like the more power of the government the better it is for society. Jefferson wanted more of a smaller government and having people with individual rights. Hamilton and Jefferson were two ways different thinkers in what they want for society and believe in. Hamilton was in favor of a strong central government and a national constitution. He wasn't really a strong supporter of democracy or even the Bill of Rights. Favored implied powers, a loose construction of the constitution. He was one of many writers of the Federalists papers. Also favored the wealthy, urban commercial interests of the nation. Hamilton created national debt and actually paid for it all through a brilliant plan of taxing whiskey. He was an official member of the Federalist party and the first secretary of treasury. He was unfortunately killed in a duel vise president Aaron Burr. He was one who was fond of and greatly admired England or Britain, which is known as...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

In Two Cities How Does Madame Defarge Finally Meet Her End?

...Charles, and their daughter have all fled to England, and are, at that time, in the process of doing so. When she gets there, she finds Miss Pross blocking a single doorway to the house. Defarge tries to get past her, and they fall to blows. Defarge endeavors to draw her pistol to shoot Ms. Pross, and succeeds in taking it out, but right before she fires it, Miss Pross strikes it upward, and Defarge kills herself unintentionally. 14. Who was the first governor of the Plymouth Colony? What happened to him? The first governor of Plymouth Colony was John Carver. While working in the fields one day during the unbearable heat, he collapsed of heat stroke and died shortly thereafter. 15. Who wrote the Federalist Papers? Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison collectively wrote the Federalist...

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Influences on the Constitution Table

...University of Phoenix Material Influences on the Constitution Table Write one or two paragraphs in each section. Include citations for your sources. Documents | Summary | What was its influence on the Constitution? | Magna Carta | Charter drawn up in the attempts to stave off civil war against King John in 1215. The Magna Carta gave Englishmen certain human rights, freedom of religion, reform of justice system and regulated officials. The Magna Carta limited the king’s power and created what we know today as parliament. | Freedom of Religion, a maintained justice system allowing men a fair trial, freedom from oppression and unlawful persecution, that not one man should lead a nation solely, but a group of officials, and checks and balances. | Mayflower Compact | Men aboard the Mayflower bound for Northern Virginia in 1620 decided to land in what we know as Massachusetts. They signed the Mayflower Compact to enable that crew of men the right to self govern and have equal rights. | First constitution signed in The New World, organizing a local government of an elected governor and officials to regulate laws, and taxes. Basis for self government. | Articles of Confederation | With growing popularity in the ideas of independence from England, the colonies needed a way to unite them but not take away individual state/colony rights. Written in 1777 but not approved by all states until 1781. | Gave the idea of a central government while keeping most power within each...

Words: 1063 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Confederation and Constitution

...HISTORICAL ESSAY #1 Confederation and Constitution The Articles of Confederation was agreed to by Congress on November 15, 1777 and was ratified and in force on March 1, 1781. By the year 1787, this new government had fallen short of the expectations of the people it was intended to govern. The weaknesses in The Articles of Confederation were numerous and had, in the thinking of many prominent men of that time, failed and would lead to a state of anarchy. There was such a sense of urgency to amend it that there seemed to be an atmosphere of panic among many of our Founding Fathers. John Dickenson and fellow members of the 2nd Continental Congress, weary of monarchy rule, had created the Articles of Confederation as a listing of twelve specific Powers given Congress by which to govern. Legislation required nine votes to pass. Each state had only one vote and this was problematic to the larger states, as their problems, more often than not, were based on a larger population and it was not unusual that the smaller states didn’t understand or want to pay for the solutions. Some lesser acts did not require nine votes to pass, but simply a majority of those present. Acts of Significant Consequence did require nine votes. The trouble with all of this was that even if nine votes could be achieved, there was no enforcement of law to be implemented by Congress. Congress could make law but not enforce it. It could charge states for their share of national...

Words: 2326 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Constitution Table

...University of Phoenix Material Influences on the Constitution Table Write one or two paragraphs in each section. Include citations for your sources. |Documents |Summary |What was its influence on the Constitution? | |Magna Carta |The Magna Carta was a set of laws generated by the barons of |When the thirteen US colonies became independent from Great Britain in 1776, it | | |England and the Archbishop Steven Langton of the Catholic |needed to set a central government to pass laws and enforce the laws. During this | | |Church to limit the powers that King John possessed during the |time many British settlers followed the great Britain law that was put in place by | | |12 century and of any king thereafter. The Magna Carta came |the Magna Carta. In 1789 the United States Constitution was ratified and many of the| | |into law on June 15, 1215 and marked the beginning to a |Magna Carta laws were introduced to the foundation of what is the United States | | |constitutional England where the laws were promised to be good |Constitution. Such laws as that of no man should...

Words: 3422 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Paper

...U.S. History and Constitution HIS120 Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) At the end of the course, students will be able to: SLO1.     Describe the cultural, geographic and climatic influences on Native American societies. SLO2.     Compare and contrast religious, social and cultural differences among the major European settlers. SLO3.     Describe the events that helped create American nationalism and lead to the American Revolution. SLO4.     Explain the Constitutional Convention, the Articles of Confederation, and the emergence of a democratic nation. SLO5.     Explain the U.S. Constitution as it related to the separation of powers, checks and balances, the Bill of Rights, and the major principles of democracy. SLO6.     Evaluate the Jeffersonian dream of expansion and its effect on Native Americans SLO7.     Describe Jacksonian democracy and the creation of a two party system SLO8.     Explain slavery and associated issues that led to the Civil War and its aftermath.     Module Titles Module 1—Early American exploration and colonization (SLO1) Module 2—British colonies (SLO2) Module 3—Road to the Revolution and the American Revolution (SLO3) Module 4—Early Republic (SLO4 and SLO5) Module 5—Jacksonian America (SLO 6 and SLO7) Module 6—Road to the Civil War (SLO8) Module 7—Civil War (SLO8) Module 8—Shaping American history: Signature Assignment (all SLOs) Module 1 Early Exploration and Contact with Native Americans Welcome to HIS 120: U.S....

Words: 6289 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Government

...Houston Community College Homework 1-5 Presented To: Lloyd W. Gaddis By Yushana Ford Government 2305 8:00A.M- 9:30A.M Mon/Wed 09/20/2015 Chapter 1: The More Things Change…The More They Stay the Same 1. Analyze current problems and issues in American Government by applying Historical perspectives: -History Repeats Itself +A new Communication medium paves the way to Electoral Victory- Meaning the internet and social media have revolutionized American politics. Campaign advertising is the use of an advertising campaign through the media to influence political debate and ultimately voters. Political advertising has changed drastically over the last several decades. Harry S. Truman was proud of his accomplishment of shaking approximately 500,000 hands but his accomplishment was soon pale compared to the next presidential election with the advent of television, war hero and presidential candidate D.W Eisenhower created commercials to get votes and so on and it different with different elections and different decades. +The Power of Incumbency- It is usually used in reference to elections where races can often be defined as being between an incumbent and non-incumbents. Incumbents have easier access to campaign finance and government resources that can be indirectly used to boost a campaign. Incumbency is any elected official who is already in office and seeking re-election. 2. Explain the Philosophical underpinnings of American Political System through...

Words: 10611 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Precedents

........................... 4 A. B. C. II. A. B. C. D. E. F. The Supposed Conflict Between Originalism and Precedent ............................ 5 A Short History of Precedent ............................................................................... 7 The Consistency of Originalism and Precedent ............................................... 21 The Supermajoritarian Theory of Constitutional Originalism........................ 28 The Relative Benefits of Original Meaning and Precedent ............................. 29 Precedent Rules .................................................................................................. 34 Factors Relevant to Beneficial Precedent Rules .............................................. 41 The Contrast with Other Approaches to Precedent ......................................... 44 Applying the Approach to Previous Supreme Court Overruling Decisions ... 48 THE NORMATIVE THEORY OF PRECEDENT .................................................................. 27 CONCLUSION...

Words: 28150 - Pages: 113

Free Essay

Employee

...ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to redistricting reform, from access to the courts to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution – part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group – the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S LIBERTY AND NATIONAL SECURITY PROJECT The Brennan Center initiated its Liberty and National Security project two years ago to foster better public understanding of the importance of accountability, transparency, and checks-and-balances in the formulation and implementation of national security policy. We have since been at the forefront of advocating for sound, rights-respecting policy prescriptions based on broad public participation and informed discussion. Our staff engages in a spectrum of public education, legislative advocacy, litigation and scholarly activity. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jonathan Hafetz is Litigation Director of the Liberty and National Security Project at the Brennan Center. He is actively involved in post-9/11 litigation involving detainee rights and other national security issues, and is lead counsel in several leading detention...

Words: 5638 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Pols Final Exam Review

...Federal Government Exam 1 Review: The first exam will consist of questions generated from the following review sheet. Make sure you understand each of these topics before proceeding to the test. The exam will be timed so you will not have the ability to peruse your notes or retake the exam. The exam itself will consist of 30 multiple choice questions and you will have 35 minutes to complete the exam. Federalism: The Basic elements of a Federal system of government (i.e. how is it structured/how power is shared) • Layers of gov • Equal power • Distinct powers Powers of the federal government: delegated powers, implied powers (necessary and proper clause), and concurrent powers. • Delegated Powers: (expressed/enumerated powers) powers given to the federal government directly by the constitution. Some most important delegated powers are: the authority to tax, regulated interstate commerce, authority to declare war, and grants the president role of commander and chief of the military • Implied Powers: Powers not expressed in the constitution, but that can be inferred. “Necessary and proper clause” • Concurrent powers: powers shared by both levels of government. Ex: Taxes, roads, elections, commerce, establishing courts and a judicial system • Reserved powers: powers not assigned by the constitution to the national government but left to the states or the people. Guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Include “police power”-health and public...

Words: 37488 - Pages: 150