In Sally Mann's Immediate Family, nudity is very common. In her own perspective, she want to conserve the time and the beauty of her daughter through the use of artistic photography; however, those pictures should not be published to the public if she want to keep it as a time capsule. In Richard Billingham's images of Ray's A Laugh, he depicted the family in his most realistic way as possible. The drunk father with a smoker mother create an unpleasant environment for Richard. In a way, he is using this to show his background as well as inspire people to not give up on life. Both photographer is showing their work without the consent from their family. The border line between publishing meaning photo and publishing without legal consent is blur in some cases, especially for Richard Billingham's photo.

Look at Alfred Stieglitz's selection of Georgia O'Keeffe portraits and Nicholas Nixon's "Brown Sisters" series. What is the overlap and what are the differences? Upload an image from both photographers when making your points.

In Alfred Stieglitz's selection of Georgia O'Keeffe, I can see that there are different styles of hand position that Alfred staged for Georgia, and it shows the beauty of Georgia at the time. The different compositions reflect on the age and the personality of Georgia. On the other hand, Nicholas “Brown …show more content…
By adding captions and manipulating picture, the audience would have a basic idea of what to expect in the magazine. At the same time, the level of complicity that photo illustration creates can also enhance the meaning of the overall cover. For example, the bruise and the kiss mark on former President Bush’s face shows the love and the hate that people have towards him. As a audience, I would expect the magazine to go over what is loveable about him and why do people hate