...The tension between the North and the South grew rapidly in the 19th century. The Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas Nebraska Act are just some of the events that contributed to this. The reason that this tension grew was because during these events, the North and South had different views on the events. Sometimes the South would agree but the North would disagree and that caused problems. The Missouri Compromise was the starting point for this rapid growth. It took place in 1820 and permitted Maine to be admitted into the union as a free state and Missouri as a slave state. When this happened, it maintained the balance of the Senate. Now, southern slave owners have a clear right to pursue escaped fugitives that went...
Words: 808 - Pages: 4
...Most of the debate in the first few weeks concerned the revision of the Virginia Plan. The Plan "corrected" the inequality that the "one state, one vote" notion inflicted upon the large states (and those, like the Southern states, that hoped to be large soon). Most of the details could certainly be worked out. Issues like fugitive slaves, export taxes, and import taxes were minor, when compared to the really big issue facing the Convention: representation. Quite frankly, the small states would never agree to a purely representational form of government. They foresaw the annexation of small, ineffective states as the populations of the large states continued to grow and their influence waned. Some, like the Delaware delegation, were instructed to leave the Convention if equal suffrage in the legislature was compromised. Large states felt the equal suffrage system to be inherently unfair, and were going to do everything they could to abolish it. Today, a conflict between the big and small states seems odd. Conflicts between states are now generally regional and regardless of size. But at the Convention, size, or anticipated size, was one big dividing line. The intensity of feelings of the two sides were surprises to the others - Madison and the Big State faction thought the inequality of equal suffrage to be so patently unfair that the small states would naturally accede. The small states, used to the status quo, were surprised at how forceful the big states were about proportionality...
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...The effectiveness of political compromise in reducing sectional tensions was very poor, as demonstrated by the Missouri Compromise, the compromise of 1850, and the Kansas Nebraska act. These compromises created very little help in trying to repair the tensions. One of the first compromises to try to loosen the tensions was the Missouri Compromise. It all started when Missouri was pushing to become a state. At this time the controversy between having slave vs free states was major. There were 11 free states and 11 slave states. This was an even balance for the North and the South so, having Missouri come in as a free state would grant the North more power over the South. The politician Henry Clay came up with the grand idea of admitting another state, (Maine) as a free state and Missouri as a slave state. At the time this seemed brilliant, but really it still failed to loosen the tensions. This is shown when it is repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act in...
Words: 580 - Pages: 3
...Missouri Compromise of 1820 In 1819, Missouri requested statehood, and the freedom to become a slave state. This set off a heated debate, as the twenty two states then part of the union were evenly divided eleven and eleven between free and slave. While northerners, in accordance with their plan to slowly kill off slavery by not allowing new states to be free, were against the idea of Missouri being a slave state, while Southerners used a state's rights argument. They reasoned that, like the original thirteen states, new states should be able to decide the issue of slavery for themselves. In the end, both sides reached a compromise. In the immediate future, so the states were not unbalanced, Maine became a free state, and going forward no state north of the...
Words: 1469 - Pages: 6
... Interamerican University Final Essay Exam Compromise in A Secret Sorrow and Sorrowful Woman Marriage is a compromise and both “A Sorrowful Woman” and “A Secret Sorrow” express this theme. But they portrait differently on how this compromise can affect the outcome of a marriage. On the short story “A Sorrowful Woman” shows that too much compromise can cause feelings of unfulfillment and the failure of a marriage. While in “A Secret Sorrow” shows that if there is a balance of how much is compromised the outcome can be worth the sacrifice and the marriage can thrive. Marriage is a compromise because both sides come to an agreement that they will be together to the day they die. Faye, the female protagonist of “A Secret Sorrow”, and the unnamed protagonist from “A Sorrowful Woman” both had to compromise something for marriage, yet Faye’s is the less severe of the two. The accident that she had been in made her incapable of having a child and Kai, her love, claimed to be willing to work through it and still desired to marry her. But she believed he was “playing the gentleman”(34). She thought that he was giving up his dreams for the sake of chivalry. Faye only had to give up her doubt and believe he really loved her in order to get what for her represented happiness, marriage. But for the unnamed female protagonist it seemed that marriage was the compromise. She could not stand the role of wife and mother. So mush so that “the sight of...
Words: 498 - Pages: 2
...President of the United States from 1825 to 1832. The Compromise of 1850 dealt with the following problems: If California were a free state, what to do with the slavery question in the North and South? There were many issues to discuss: slavery, the slave trade, corrupt politicians and how poorly the states were dealing with them the reality of slavery. (ouleft.org, pg 1, staff; civilwar.org, staff, ) Another question was the issue with the unresolved Texas...
Words: 1305 - Pages: 6
...American Revolution, the issue of slavery was not resolved but continued due to the U.S Government’s policies, state conflicts, and social disputes. Compromises such as Missouri, 1850, and 3/5’s were contradicted by other policies such as Dred Scott and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise (docC) was an example of how the U.S. government tried to resolve issues concerning differences in opinions concerning slavery. There was a dispute over whether or not Missouri should enter as a slave state or a free state. A similar occurrence happened in further West during the Wilmot Proviso (docE). In both situations the government tried to find a simple fix rather than instilling a consolidated solution. Many southerners, such as Thomas Jefferson (docD), disagreed with the Missouri Compromise because they seen it as a poor decision made by the federal government when it should be a state issue....
Words: 403 - Pages: 2
...The Civil War became an impending event after the fallout following the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was meant to solve the United States’ problems, but neither side got exactly what it wanted. Thus, the nation became more divided, and a civil war became increasingly unavoidable. However, the compromise might have worked if either side was less biased and more open to other ideas and settlements. Also, the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin (Written by Harriet Beecher Stowe) played a large role in the events leading up to the war. The book inspired antislavery people but angered those who were proslavery. The book horrified many Americans, but southern slave owners denied that the events in the book occurred in real life. This created separation...
Words: 303 - Pages: 2
...the textbook, lecture and power-point notes compare and contrast the compromises of 1820 and 1850. Slavery came about in America in 1619 (RN). It lasted through the American Revolution, even after Thomas Jefferson scripted his famous lines in the Declaration of Independence, "All men are created equal. They are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Clearly, slaves were not part of this included in Jefferson's words. When it came time to write the Constitution, the word "slavery" was never used. Instead, the framers chose to use the term "other people." These other people were counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation in Congress according to the Three-Fifths Compromise (RN). This compromise kept slavery in the United States unharmed. The framers also decided not to do anything about the issue of slavery for twenty years. Prior to the American Civil War, many different compromises were made in an attempt to hinder the growing disagreements. However, this only extended the unavoidable events that would occur. The differences between North and South were far to great and compromise did not stand a chance at preventing the imminent conflict. This was most clearly shown in the ways in which the two main compromises: the Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri Compromise, and the Compromise of 1850 failed. In 1820 Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave...
Words: 2024 - Pages: 9
...Particularly, the Compromise of 1850 opened a gap in the slave system regarding popular sovereignty. Shown in a map are effects of the Compromise of 1850 where the Utah and New Mexico territories were placed under the principle of popular sovereignty (Document A). This is a significant factor from a social standpoint because popular sovereignty created the belief that Americans had a voice in the government. Negatively, however, popular sovereignty led to clashes between the pro-slavery and antislavery groups, such as in “Bleeding Kansas.” Moreover, the Constitution is left for interpretation, and from a Southern standpoint, is taken advantage of by the North. When the South assisted in the acquisition of a new territory, the North instantly fought the ability of Southern men to bring slavery into the land. This prevents...
Words: 1280 - Pages: 6
...Calhoun, and Daniel Webster’s Speeches on the Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 was a proposed solution to the conflict over slavery in the new territories acquired in the Mexican-American War by Kentucky Senator Henry Clay. It consisted of laws that admitted California into the Union as a free state, the Fugitive Slave Act would be amended, the slave trade in Washington, D.C. would be abolished, a government created in Utah, and boundaries set between Texas and New Mexico. The Compromise of 1850 was first introduced at the Senate meeting in February 1850. The proposal brought about heavy debates from John C. Calhoun, Daniel Webster, and William Henry Seward. They were similar because each man loved and served their country and was passionate about their view of the issues of slavery and the new territories and believed their opinion was correct; however they were very different in what each believed to be fair and true. John C. Calhoun of South Carolina did not support The Compromise of 1850. He believed it was a betrayal to the south. He argued that the North and South were almost on equal grounds when the Constitution was ratified with an equal division of the States, but all of this was threatened by the Northern influence on government. Clay also argued that if Northerners wanted the south to stay in the Union they would have to stop in their attempts to limit slavery. Daniel Webster of Massachusetts supported The Compromise of 1850 proposed by Henry Clay of Kentucky...
Words: 549 - Pages: 3
...The Missouri Compromise was an agreement in 1820 between the existing states and Congress about slavery. Tension had begun to rise between between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups within the US Congress and the people of the nation. It all boiled up to an insane amount when Missouri requested to become a slave state instead of a free state. This request, if followed through by Congress, would ruin the fragile balance between the existing slave and free states. At that time, there were eleven free states and eleven slave states and disrupting that balance would upset way too many people. To keep the peace between the people and Congress, Congress formulated a two-part compromise. Missouri would get their wish to become a slave state, but in return, Maine would be admitted as a free state. It was a simple trade off that ended up causing more problems than anyone could have seen coming. The second part of the compromise was an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory and established a boundary between the free and slave states. This amendment and land remained this way until the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. The extremely rough debate over Missouri's application as a slave state lasted all the way from December...
Words: 510 - Pages: 3
...Although the Compromise of 1850 introduced several measures that would impact the nation and cause further tensions and division amongst pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups, the Fugitive Slave Act was the most controversial. The Fugitive Slave Act safeguarded slavery, not only in the states where slavery was allowed, but also imposed this same protection in non-slave states. While abolitionists regarded this as a violation of state sovereignty and a disparagement to free land, pro-slavery groups rejoiced in the strengthening of political and legal support of slavery throughout the United States. As law officials attempted to reclaim slaves who had escaped to freedom in the north, they were met with increasing resistance and violence....
Words: 365 - Pages: 2
...The Missouri Compromise settled the question of slavery for many years in the United States. It's repeal would bring so much conflict that it would lead to the Civil War. Missouri applied for statehood on December 18, 1818. This created a huge problem because the Northern states refused to even allow another slave state to join the Union. A compromise developed when Maine applied for statehood in 1819. Maine could join as a free state to balance out Missouri joining as a slave state. By the year 1820, the compromise had been realized. The first step was that Missouri and Maine would be admitted to the Union, one as free and the others as slave. In 1845 the Missouri Compromise was revoked as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The revoke was more impactful than the compromise itself. It effectively settled the question of slavery from 1820 to 1854, it's revoke began the sectarian conflict which eventually brought the United States into the Civil War....
Words: 483 - Pages: 2
...Annotated Bibliography Clay, Henry. Missouri Compromise. Congress,1820. Henry Clay’s compromise, Missouri Compromise, is an excellent bill which made sure that their was at least a settlement between the slave states who wanted Missouri to become a slave state, and the free states that wanted Missouri to become a free state. At the time there were 11 free states and 11 slave states and none of the states want the other “side” to have more power than the other, meaning more representatives. This compromise is important because clay found out a way to balance the states by added Maine into the Union as well. Emerson, Ralph. Self Reliance. Boston,1840 Ralph Emerson’s Self Reliance is an excellent essay in which he spreads his idea our individual...
Words: 258 - Pages: 2
