Computer Forensic Analysis and Report
Nathaniel B. Rollins Jr
Kaplan University

Computer Forensics I/CF101
Prof: Tatyana Zidarov
November 19, 2012

Computer Forensic Analysis and Report A. INTODUCTION I Nathaniel B. Rollins a Computer Forensic Specialist (CFS) with the Metro Police Department (MPD) received a file image from Officer X to conduct a search for electronic evidence. Which he stated was copied from the SNEEKIE BADINUF (COMPLAINANT) computer, with consent. This was verified through COMPLAINANT statement, repot, consent to search form, and chain of custody, provided by Officer X, along with the request for analyzing the evidence. Upon reviewing of her statement filed on May 14 2006, the COMPLAINANT stated she had received an email from a correspondent named NFarious that demanded $5000 in ransom, or the animals would be harmed. The COMPLAINANT also stated her pets had been gone for an entire week, and she was worried that the abductor may already have injured the animals. During a subsequent interview the COMPLAINANT stated that she took out a $20,000 insurance policy on her pets in September 2005 that would not be active for 6 month. The purpose of this investigation is to confer or negate the COMPLAINTANTS involvement with the kidnaping of the animals. B. MATERIALS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW a. 1 Chain of Custody b. Evidence Log c. Complainants Statement d. Officers Report e. Forensic Disk Image of Computer f. Photos (location of PC in residence) g. Collection Checklist (first responders tool) h. Consent Form (search and seizer) C. BACKGROUND I CFS Rollins verified the forensic equipment and software was forensically clean and operational, resulting in negative findings, all software and hardware operational. At 1530 on May 14, 2006 I CFS Rollins began the bit-stream image of the forensic