Premium Essay

Concept Builders vs. Nlrc

In:

Submitted By iloveyouamigo
Words 2742
Pages 11
FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 108734. May 29, 1996]
CONCEPT BUILDERS, INC., petitioner, vs. THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, (First Division); and Norberto Marabe, Rodolfo Raquel, Cristobal Riego, Manuel Gillego, Palcronio Giducos, Pedro Aboigar, Norberto Comendador, Rogello Salut, Emilio Garcia, Jr., Mariano Rio, Paulina Basea, Aifredo Albera, Paquito Salut, Domingo Guarino, Romeo Galve, Dominador Sabina, Felipe Radiana, Gavino Sualibio, Moreno Escares, Ferdinand Torres, Felipe Basilan, and Ruben Robalos,respondents.
D E C I S I O N
HERMOSISIMA, JR., J.:
The corporate mask may be lifted and the corporate veil may be pierced when a corporation is just but the alter ego of a person or of another corporation. Where badges of fraud exist; where public convenience is defeated; where a wrong is sought to be justified thereby, the corporate fiction or the notion of legal entity should come to naught.The law in these instances will regard the corporation as a mere association of persons and, in case of two corporations, merge them into one.
Thus, where a sister corporation is used as a shield to evade a corporations subsidiary liability for damages, the corporation may not be heard to say that it has a personality separate and distinct from the other corporation. The piercing of the corporate veil comes into play.
This special civil action ostensibly raises the question of whether the National Labor Relations Commission committed grave abuse of discretion when it issued a break-open order to the sheriff to be enforced against personal property found in the premises of petitioners sister company.
Petitioner Concept Builders, Inc., a domestic corporation, with principal office at 355Maysan Road, Valenzuela, Metro Manila, is engaged in the construction business. Private respondents were employed by said company as laborers, carpenters and riggers.
On November,

Similar Documents