...The Cons of Standardized Testing In past decades, tests were given to students to decide their placement in classes or to determine which students needed to be placed in resources class. Today, standardized tests are used for arbitrating the success or failure of students, teachers, and schools. “Despite their biases, inaccuracies, limited ability to measure achievement or ability, and other flaws, schools use standardized tests to determine if children are ready for school, track them into instructional groups; diagnose for learning disability, retardation and other handicaps; and decide whether to promote, retain in grade, or graduate many students. Schools also use tests to guide and control curriculum content and teaching methods” (Fair Test, 2007). On top of that, should one test at the end of a school year determine if a teacher was successful? No! A teacher’s success should be determined on the children’s learning throughout an entire school year based on many different assessments; this should be the same for children’s success. Students and teachers need to be held accountable for their success but not by administrating a standardized test. Standardized testing has become a political issue. When schools are tested they are compared to other schools in there state and nationally which permits politicians to display their concerns about certain school systems. You see, in the political world politician’s show their concern with our schools by attaching standardized...
Words: 1185 - Pages: 5
...Position Paper – The Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation The Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation Animal research has had a major role in many scientific and medical advances. It has both its advantages and disadvantages. “Moreover,” animal experimentation is an extremely controversial subject that has divided people into a group that either support animal testing or oppose it all together, and another that advocates the use of alternatives. There are many pros and cons when it comes to this subject. People all over the world have different opinions on weather animal lab testing is humane and necessary. Animal experimentation is unethical due to the practice of animal torture and suffering, animal choice and death of these animals. Animal experimentation (noun): any type of experiment performed on living animals, especially in order to test the effects of chemical compounds such as new drugs, cosmetics, food additives and pesticides (Animal experimentation, 2001). All over the world, people think differently on whether animal experimentation is an appropriate way to test medicines and products. Each year in the United States, an estimated 70 million animals are maimed, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Substances we use every day, such...
Words: 1471 - Pages: 6
...Standardized Testing Standardized testing is probably one of the most bittersweet aspects of American education. On one hand, It helps us set a baseline of where students are academically and what needs to be approved on in average. On the other, it adds a tremendous amount of stress to some students, and encourages the system to lean to a curriculum that “teaches to test”. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of standardized testing and provide my personal opinions on it in the end. Standardized testing does a pretty good job of establishing a baseline of where students land and what needs to be improved on. “Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are doing as compared to students across the country and locally.”(Columbia University School and Child Care Search Service 1). This also gives us areas that need to be improved on. Another good thing about standardized testing is that it helps teachers know what material needs to be taught during the year. “Probably the greatest benefit of standardized testing is that teachers and schools are responsible for teaching students what they are required to know for these standardized tests.” (Columbia University School and Child Care Search Service 1). Standardized testing improves international rankings as...
Words: 547 - Pages: 3
...Did you know that “the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered pain during [animal tests]” (ProCon). The fact that over 71,370 animals are suffering through tests begs the question as to why we continue if that many animals are being harmed. However, the rise of animal testing in products has brought up a controversial issue since the late nineteenth century when it first became popular. Animal testing is experiments put on animals to help understand the possible outcomes it can put on humans. Today, animals get tested for different products often found in cosmetics, prescriptions, and household cleaning supplies. The cons associated with animal testing today by far outweigh the possible pros that could come from it. Although most people would agree with testing products before humans use them in everyday life,...
Words: 691 - Pages: 3
...In the American education system, standardized testing is something that both teachers and students can’t escape from. State mandated test can create many problems within the education system, and result in the failure of students. For Example, “Rather than conceptualizing and retaining knowledge for the long term, students remember what they have to and forget when they no longer need it. It shows a single way of teaching and stifles creativity in the school system” (Armstrong). This shows that students are on a continuous cycle of learning, and testing, learning and testing. This is harmful to both students and teachers because for one, students in the long run are not really learning enough to prepare them for college, and teachers have...
Words: 337 - Pages: 2
...Human Testing ethical? Human testing was established to allow scientist to create medicine that is safe for mankind, and everyday products. Human testing helps scientists to study human anatomy and to understand it, for the most part. According to Juengst in “Genetic Testing and Screening”, The more you try to understand genes the more complicated it can get (Juengst 5). The author is explaining on how advanced the human body can truly be. Human testing doesn't sound that bad, right? Well what if someone told you that human testing was being demonstrated on men, women and even children, without their consent? Human testing is not only ethical but also vital to the environment and for survival. Human testing is the study of human genetics...
Words: 956 - Pages: 4
...Are standardized tests really necessary? In my opinion the state should discontinue standardized tests because all it is doing is teaching students to pass the test rather than learning ways to apply the material in real world situations, and not everything on the test will be of use to the students. Most of the times, the teachers teach their students the curriculum of the tests, instead of teaching material that can be used in the real world. One example, could be those formulas and equations used in math. It is uncommon to see a real world problem along with a formula. Math commonly uses formulas, but formulas are not commonly used in daily life. They mostly teach the process, but not how to apply those skills in a daily life situation....
Words: 312 - Pages: 2
...Have you ever heard of animal testing, if you have then you might have heard it is a cruel and barbaric way to find cures that don’t even work? Also you may have heard from someone on the other end of the totem pole who believe that animal testing and the affects that come with them are a sad but necessary part of life and that is what stands out to be true. If You want to learn more facts and opinions from both sides so you can draw your own conclusion I implore you to keep reading. Body paragraph one: Many view animal testing as cruel and barbaric though they don’t see the benefits that come out of it. Although some animals are permanently injured and some die so many lives, humans and animals are saved. Before you judge based off of rumors...
Words: 404 - Pages: 2
...Animal Testing Introduction The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to Pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years. Laboratory animals are generally used in three primary fields: biomedical research, product security evaluation and education. (Animal Experiments) It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Reports have been generated to indicate that about 10 percent of these animals are not being administered with painkillers. The supporters of animal rights are pressurizing government agencies to inflict severe regulations on animal research. However, such emerging criticisms of painful experimentation on animals are coupled with an increasing concern over the cost it would have on the limitation of scientific progress. (Of Cures and Creatures Great and Small) Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. Each and every medication used by humans is first tested on the animals. Animals were also applied to develop anesthetics to ease human ailments and suffering during surgery. (Animal Experiments) Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surround animal testing. As a result several regulations have been put in place to evaluate and control the...
Words: 3584 - Pages: 15
...envision if they're safe or effective’’ (Animalequality). The result with animal testing is that we've several new medicines that facilitate save several our lives and keep United States functioning properly. Although it's going to kill several animals within the finish it's a sacrifice we've to decide on to form for the higher of our race. It’s additionally higher to use animals than its humans. There is also no alternative to using other than using animals for testing. Living systems like persons and animals are extraordinarily complicated. Finding out cell cultures in a very Petri dish, whereas generally helpful, doesn't...
Words: 1432 - Pages: 6
...Introduction About 95% of animals that are tested on are not protected by law and the other 5% are only given minimal protection. Each year millions of animals are harmed by the unlawful testing. Cosmetic and pharmaceutical companies should not be allowed to test their experimental products on animals and harm the animals, instead companies should find alternative solutions. Animals have been subjected to testing since the early Greek Scientists such as Aristotle and Erasistratus started the use of testing on animals. After, Aristotle and Erasistratus started testing on animals many physicians began to test surgical procedures on animals before they performed the procedures on humans. In the late 1930s, the United States Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act passed a law that enforced companies to test their products on animals before the product can be released to the public and then, other United States Administrations decided that it was a...
Words: 1224 - Pages: 5
...Animal testing can be defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects” (Dictionary.com, 2014), and is generally involved in the testing of medical or cosmetic products. Research on living animals has been “practiced since at least 500 BC,” and an estimated “26 million animals are used every year in the United States” for scientific and commercial testing (ProCon.org, 2016). While animal testing has contributed to progress in the medical field, the ethical barriers it brings up causes us to wonder if companies should be allowed to test on live animals for medical purposes. There are many non-profit organizations dedicated towards ending the use of animals in research, testing, and science education and replacing...
Words: 541 - Pages: 3
...Imagine being adopted from a foreign country, you don’t know anything about your family’s genetic history or your ancestry. What can you do to find out these types of things? You could take a genetic test, genetic testing can be used to help prevent diseases, it’s the analysis and collection of someone's DNA. It helps identify what diseases someone is predisposed to and can recommend steps to help them change their lifestyle. A wide variety of genetic tests are now available to the public, some give the person’s ancestry, others can give deeper insights to their genetic code. Companies like Ancestry.com began with 2 million sales at the end of 2016, in August of 2017 they had already sold around 5 million. Genetic tests are becoming increasingly common and used more often. It is important that you understand your ancestral history, you can start by using a general genetic test. Genetic tests are very accessible to the public and the majority are very general. Many companies sell genetic tests There are over 30 companies that sell genetic tests. Some even cater to different countries. There are over 25 companies that do not sell tests anymore. The tests are very general and are not specific. General tests give the...
Words: 845 - Pages: 4
...Taking standardized tests has put me under too much pressure. The time was coming for me to take the ACT test as my junior year of high school had started. When my brother had taken the test, he had used a tutor to prepare for it, so I decided to use the tutor as well, meeting with him twice a week after school. I had to study for the ACT test, keep my grades up, and stay involved in extracurricular activities, which occupied most of my time during the day. Therefore, spending time for other interests became a challenge as I had little time to spare. I took my first ACT test in December, but soon scheduled another test and returned to the tutor after a less-than-satisfactory score. In my research of potential colleges, it became apparent...
Words: 254 - Pages: 2
...“He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” ― Immanuel Kant. Likewise, we can judge the amount of justice animals get in animal testing. While some believe animals should be tested on because it is necessary, most test on animals are not necessary, fail often, and are inhumane. Tests on animals are not necessary and are incorrect. First of all, most experiments are flawed; 87% of animal tests fail, causing animal lives to be sacrificed for nothing, according to procon.org. This means that people are being inconsiderate about wasted animals subjects. In the same fashion, 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials anyways. To add, there are many alternatives to animal testing, and new technology that does not require animal subjects. WIth all these failed tests, animals are dying for...
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
