Free Essay

Corporate Governance

In:

Submitted By yul3489
Words 1696
Pages 7
Purpose of study This journal is focusing about the relationship of investor protection and the risk choices in corporate investment. It also examines the factor that influence the risk choices are either due to the insider or the manager explicit ownership and compensation structure or through private benefit. From this journal, my review is about the positive relationship between investor and risk choices in order to influence more investment to help the corporation in manufacturing sector to survive from different level of risk and sustain a good firm’s growth rate in future. Motivation of study According to the “law and finance” approach by La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer and Vishny (1998 and 2000), they stated that the role of investor protection is really important to ensure for a good development of the country. Referring to the World Bank ranking, the top ten countries that have good investor protection are a part of OECD countries that have good political and economic condition and the most surprisingly Malaysia is one of the countries that only as an emerging country. From this, we clearly know the important of investor protection in order to help the country itself to survive in a longer time. Besides that, the corporations have to know how to raise external capital and grow without need to increase the risk. Nowadays, many corporations unable to survive without making a good risk choices plus do not make much in order to protect their investor. Problem statement 1) There is positive relationship between investor protection and risk taking in corporate investment. It is with the interfere of institutions like bank, loan, and labor union able to influence the risk taking of the firm on the investment as well? 2) Is it with the higher risk taking able to improve the productivity and growth of the firm? Contribution of study As we know, the investor protection is one of the most important elements that can ensure for those who are investing in the regulated financial are not being cheated by the other party. To attract more investors to invest are not easy in order to sustain of the corporation growth rate. Basically, there are a few positive relationship between investor protection and the riskiness

of the corporate investment. Investor protection able to influence the amount of corporate resources that can turn into private benefit. Most of the company will play safe where they only will pick the project that risky when the expected outcome is in high cash state flow is sufficient to cover up for the lower level of diversion in less profitable states. As referring to Shleifer and Wolfenzon (2002), they state that the better investor protection, the smaller the expected diversion. Besides that, the employer also able to protect their career when they are using corporate resources in order to diversify the company operational riskier. The better of investor protection with conservative behaviour will return with higher corporate risk taking and improve the value of the project. In conjunction with this matter, it will give more power to the dominant owner in order to protect their corporation benefit from taken by the outsiders that only have limited equity. However, the dominant also can take advantage and will influence to invest more conservative than they would as they know the diversified portfolio of the corporation. Another contribution is it will attract a greater influence and interfere of non-equity shareholders like banks, labor unions and government on the investment policy of corporation within the countries that have poor investor protection. For example, a firm mostly will depend on loan from bank in order to sustain the company growth so that the bank will take advantage with a low investor protection and able to attract the firm to take a conservative investment policy. Theoretical framework They using the tunneling concept in order to discuss how dominant insider or shareholder can have a strong control right with a very low level of a cash flow right. This concept is actually satisfied with the poor investor protection countries as when the tunneling cost is varying with the amount of cash flow plus r is lower when the unit has higher cash flow. As we know, when r is drop, more people will choose to invest with big amount without thinking about the risk. From this they come out with three channel by the first one is lower the investor protection will allow the insider with low level cash flow right to keep the corporation resources as their own benefit. Another channel is come out from undiversified ownership with low investor protection countries wherer the owner are controlling to take the less risky investment in order to protect their property and wealth. The third one is come out from the important of nonequity holder group like bank, labor, and government as they can influence the firm easily for choosing the investment.

Methodology - Market, sample, data, variables, statistical issues such as endogeneity and others. From this journal, it using the ten years of data from the large panel of manufacturing companies from Compustat Global Vantat for 39 countries from 1992 to 2002. They did examine through a cross country study. The regression specification that been used is:
RISKC = α1 + α2Investor Protectionc + α3Stakeholder Influence+α4Xc + ωc, (1) RGDPc = β1 + β2RISKc + β3Yc + ϑc, and TFPc = γ1 + γ2RISKc + γ3Zc + ςc, (2) (3)

Within the cross country study, it regress the firm and country level of corporate operation on variable that relate to investor protection and stakeholders plus the growth as well. In order to come up with the result, the variable that been used is by measuring the risk taking. In this measurement, it develops three proxies of the degree of risk taking in firm operation based on the volatility of corporate earning where as the market adjusted volatility of firm earnings within the sample of 1992 to 2002, a country average of the volatility of firm earnings and an imputed country risk score. They simplified with three type of risk. For the RISK 1, they used the 5 years of earning and total asset within the given ten years and then compute the deviation of the firm’s EBITDA/Assets from the country average. Then, they calculate the standard deviation of this measure for each firm. For the RISK 2, they calculate the average of RISK 1 within the given countries. They are not fully depends on this two risk solely because they may be linked to investor protection. As we know, the diversion of the internal corporate resources may reduce the earnings volatility observed. It is a positive relationship between the investor protection and income fluctuation when deviation is lower and investor protection are stronger even not relate to investment management risk selection. To overcome this matter, then they come out with RISK 3 as they develop the measure of risk taking. They used U.S earnings data to calculate the industry for industry risk score,σUSA 1994−1997, j . According to Leuz, Nanda, and Wysocki (2003) and Bhattacharya, Daouk, and Welker (2003, they stated that the observation of the cash flow of U.S data is certainly not perfect and less income smoothing compared to the other countries. Due to recession they taking the year of 1994 to 1997 as the impute score of risk taking as the sample of report’s business unit within the years are quite changing. They only using the firm with sales above $10million as they believed with the firm that put more investments into riskier can get a higher RISK 3 score.

As simplified, this RISK 3 is actually taking the average over 1998 to 2002 of the country annual value-weighted average of risk scores, σUSA 1994−1997, j.

Findings From the regression that using Risk 1, it show a positive significant relationship between the corporate accountability and firm level risk-taking with the anticipation of rule of law and anti-director rights. The coefficient on the proxy for the bargaining power of labor unions is positively significance related. From the Regression that using Risk 2, they compute with 4 models. In model 1, the accounting disclosure is showing a positively significance result while in model 2 the rule of laws coefficient only show a weak positive significance. The anti-director variable is not significance in the model 3. When all the three variables are included, only accounting disclosure has a significance regression coefficient in model 4. As simplified, the better the investor protection will increase risk taking propensity. From the regression that using Risk 3, there is no negative significance relationship between the nonequity stakeholder and risk taking. While the bank and labor unions also show a positive significance coefficient. The regression for the country productivity growth also show a positive insignificant coefficient. As simplified, it is proven that there is a positive relationship between investor protection and corporate risk taking and the between of risk taking and growth. By the way from this interpretation could be due to two reasons where for the first one using a small sample and the proxy for the risk taking in the country level analysis is based upon a subset of the economy. Implication From the review, we can conclude that the investor protection is really important to support the country in order to sustain the firm growth plus can influence the firm to invest with the best risk. So that the firm should improve to have a better investor for their own benefit in future. This can help them from being cheated and prevent other dominant insider to take advantage on their wealth for his or her own benefit. Hopefully, more research and findings related to this matter come out to help the firm to be more cautious and take serious action to enhance their own reputation in future.

UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA KUALA LUMPUR

MASTER OF SCIENCE (FINANCE)

CORPORATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (BWFF5013)

Article Review on
Corporate Governance and Risk Taking
(Kose John, Lubomir Litov, and Bernard Yeung) The Journal of Finance, Vol. xiii, No. 4, August 2008

Name Matric Number

: Yulfaizah Binti Mohd Yusoff : 817158

Submission Date : 21/6/2014 Lecturer’s Name :Dr. Khaw Lee Hwei

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...1.0 Introductions 2.0 Literature review 3.0 Background and history of Development CG The term of corporate governance not just been introduced but it also drew attention of the public about the weaknesses of Malaysian corporate governance practice due to the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. After 1998, the government of Malaysia decided to adopt the corporate reforms to enhance the quality of good corporate governance practice in the country. The main sources of the Corporate Governance reforms agenda in Malaysia other than Malaysian Code on Corporate governance are the Capital Market Master Plan (CMP) and also Financial Sector Master Plan (FSMP). This sources provides guidelines on the principles and best practices in corporate governance and the direction for the implementation as well as charts for the future prospects of corporate governance in Malaysia. Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance is an initiative that established by the Financial Committee on Corporate in 1998. This committee is consists of both government and also industry. MCCG was introduced on March 2000. This code brought a systematical change in structure of public and also private corporation. The principles underlying the report focus on four areas which are board of directors, directors’s remuneration, shareholders and accountability and audit. Compliance with the code is not mandatory. However, the listed companies in Bursa Malaysia are required to prepare their annual report on how they have...

Words: 2720 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Table of Contents 1. TITLE PAGE 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 3. INTRODUCTION: 6 4. CONTEXT OF THE COMPANY: 7 5. WHAT IS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: 8 6. THE PURPOSE AND BENEFIT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE: 8 7. GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERANCE: 9 8. REVIEW OF REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: 9 8.1 Organisation Structure: 10 8.2 Republic Bank Limited’s Core Values: 11 8.3 Republic Bank Limited’s Code of Conduct and Ethics: 12 8.4 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Republic Bank Limited: 12 8.5 Policies and Procedures in Republic Bank Limited: 13 9. CONCLUSION: 13 10. RECOMMENDATION: 14 -15 11. REFERENCES: 16 12. APPENDICES: 17 Appendix I 17 Appendix II 18 Appendix III 19 - 20 Appendix IV 21 - 22 Appendix V 23   TO: THE CHAIRMAN, REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED FROM: CONSULTANT DATE: 03RD MARCH, 2014 SUBJECT: IMPROVING CORPORATE GOVERANCE IN REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It has been established that Organisations need to have a Competitive Advantage to remain viable and profitable. In order to accomplish this, one (1) essential tool is good Corporate Governance. This paper first identifies what good Corporate Governance entails then reviews the Corporate Governance process of Republic Bank Limited (a local banking organisation) utilising the tools, concepts and theories of the governance process identified. Some recommendations have been made to further enhance what the bank currently practices. 3. INTRODUCTION: The extent...

Words: 4276 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Corporate Governance Issues and Responsibility On the basis of the principles and rules outlined by the New Zealand Security Commission and code of ethics adopted by NZFSU and PGGW Wrightson in their company’s prospectus, they have failed to follow good corporate governance in their companies. In this case study, there were many corporate governance issues and some of them are highlighted below Board Composition and review: There was imbalance of independent and non independent directors in the board. Craig Norgate, who was the Chairman of PGG Wrightson failed to promote cooperation and efficiency amongst the board members, and was unsuccessful in trying to maintaining good relationship between the management and the board. The Chairman of NZFSU and PGWW failed to comply with the rules of Corporate Governance that, there should be a mix of balance and skills according to the size and complexity of firms, and in this case study, there were fewer independent directors and the need of them were felt by NZFSU, when the company’s current directors were unable to cope up with the failure of the company The board need to achieve the right mix, and should choose directors who have the required skills and knowledge and can contribute to achieve the goal of the company and provide more benefits to the shareholders. There should be a rigorous process for nomination and selection procedure of a director. The Chairman of Boards of PGG Wrightson and NZFSU, were accused in not disclosing...

Words: 2250 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 1 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE We can attribute societies demand for improved corporate governance on the number of recent financial scandals that have occurred in both the United States and abroad in the past decade. For many organizations, the way to rebuild shareholder confidence was to implement a fundamental framework of procedures that would ensure scandals like Enron, WorldCom and Tyco would not occur in the future. It is precisely these scandals that made corporate governance the focus of organizations worldwide. Corporate governance is defined as the principles and processes that provide the strategies on how an organization directs and obtains its goals, the oversight process for implementing effective accountability from its directors and managers (Rittenberg, Johnstone, & Gramling, 2012). What are two of the principles that surround corporate governance? How do they tie into the recent legislation that was put into place to resolve ethical challenges and changes within the last decade? Two principles that surround corporate governance include “successful management and ethical corporate culture and independence and objectivity” (Creel, 2013). It is management’s responsibility to create a culture of “integrity and ethical behavior” (Rittenberg, Johnstone, & Gramling, 2012). In addition, it is imperative for board members to maintain their objectivity and their judgment must remain independent and in the best interest of its stakeholders. Corporate...

Words: 1286 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Examination Paper IIBM Institute of Business Management Examination Paper Corporate Governance Section A: OBJECTIVE TYPE (20 marks) MM.50 • • • This section consists of Multiple choice questions. Answer all the questions. Questions carry 1 mark each. 1. In the second version of McKinsey’s model called “the Central model” governance chain is represented by a. Well-developed equity market & dispersed ownership b. Underdeveloped equity market & concentrated ownership c. Well-developed equity market & concentrated ownership d. Underdeveloped equity market & dispersed ownership 2. Corporate governance refers to a combination of law, rules, regulations and a. Value b. Wealth c. Voluntary practices d. Customer Satisfaction 3. ____________, is one of the major tools. Corporations use to direct persuasive communication to target buyers & the public. a. Advertising b. Media c. Press d. None 4. Policy adopted by the monetary authority with respect to the supply of money is called a. Monetary Policy b. Fiscal Policy c. Budgetary Policy d. Economic Policy 5. Cash reserve requirements refer to the a. Purchase & Sale of government securities & other approved securities by the Central bank. b. Changes in bank rate by the Central Bank c. That portion of bank’s total cash reserves which they are statutorily required to hold with the RBI. IIBM Institute of Business Management 1 Examination Paper d. The particular level of liquid ity maintained by commercial banks. 6. This committee...

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Executive Summary This report pretends to do a review of the Corporate Governance about Amazon.com. The methodology adopted for this work is based in information available from the company in its websites and annual reports. In the brief report the review of the structure, process and effectiveness of the governance of the amazon.com is made and the recommendations for appropriate improvements are given it the end of the report. I concluded that company shows the corporate governance components according to their core business and their environmental business. Table of the Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................04 2. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.................... 04 3. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics........................................................05 4. Officers and Directors.................................................................................08 5. Conclusion & Recommendation.................................................................09 6. References...................................................................................................11 1. INTRODUCTION: Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) is an American multinational electronic commerce company with headquarters in Seattle, Washington, United States. It is the world's largest online retailer. The company also produces consumer electronics...

Words: 2304 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...board through a one-to-one training for up to a year. The training includes workshops on corporate governance, risk management, roles of a non-executive director and assistance in capturing types of board aligned for their interest and strengths (Sealy, Doldor, & Vinnicombe, 2009). The Female FTSE Report in 2008 has named 1,800+ women at committee level across a variety of industries and these names were compiled as a very real response to the ‘lack of pipeline’ argument. However, these are just a list of names envisioned to be on the radar of search consultancies. Initiatives in database management in the UK therefore saw a major executive search consultancy announced a compilation of a database of senior female executives in the FTSE 250 companies aimed to increase the percentage of female board members on the organizations (Sealy, Doldor, & Vinnicombe, 2009). In addition, the Appointment Commission and UKRC for women in SET have been actively managing their database of potential female candidates. These organizations will match opportunities and those women on their databases. In 2004, a FTSE 100 cross-company set up a mentoring scheme aimed to provide mentoring at senior level for senior women in the FTSE 100 companies who were deemed to be potential board members (Sealy, Doldor, & Vinnicombe, 2009). In Canada, a certified mixed-sex training programme is run by the Corporate Directors aimed to prepare individual men and women for board positions. Furthermore...

Words: 2166 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...What is Corporate Governance?Corporate Governance refers to the way a corporation is governed. It is the technique by which companies are directed and managed. It means carrying the business as per the stakeholders’ desires. It is actually conducted by the board of Directors and the concerned committees for the company’s stakeholder’s benefit. It is all about balancing individual and societal goals, as well as, economic and social goals.Corporate Governance is the interaction between various participants (shareholders, board of directors, and company’s management) in shaping corporation’s performance and the way it is proceeding towards. The relationship between the owners and the managers in an organization must be healthy and there should be no conflict between the two. The owners must see that individual’s actual performance is according to the standard performance. These dimensions of corporate governance should not be overlooked. | Corporate Governance deals with the manner the providers of finance guarantee themselves of getting a fair return on their investment. Corporate Governance clearly distinguishes between the owners and the managers. The managers are the deciding authority. In modern corporations, the functions/ tasks of owners and managers should be clearly defined, rather, harmonizing. Corporate Governance deals with determining ways to take effective strategic decisions. It gives ultimate authority and complete responsibility to the Board of Directors. In today’s...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...fraud. Various academic theories surrounding corporate governance will be explored (agency; stewardship and stakeholder) in examining the investor protection framework within the banking industry. Peter Gourevitch argues that various differing corporate governance models exists globally as a result of differing political climates which shape the rules and regulations that make up a country’s corporate governance model. Erik Berglof and Stijn Claessens argue that enforcement is the key to good corporate governance. However, enforcement is a result of a country’s political system which ultimately decides on the framework for regulation and enforcement. Peter Mulbert discusses corporate governance of banks in a principal-agent framework and that the corporate governance of a bank differs from those of a regular firm. This is contrasted with T.G. Arun and J.D. Turner’s discussion of corporate governance of banks in developing economies. Rafael La Porta et al. in their paper “Investor protection and corporate governance” argue that “that the legal approach is a more fruitful way to understand corporate governance and its reform than the conventional distinction between bank-centered and market-centered financial systems.” They continue to argue in their paper “Law and Finance” that investor protection are usually strongest in common-law based countries as compared to civil-law based countries within a corporate governance framework. This literature review provides a very...

Words: 422 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...B: Short Notes | Question | Answer | 11(continued)1(continued) | Clause 49The term ‘Clause 49’ refers to clause number 49 of the Listing Agreement between a company and the Stock Exchanges on which it is listed. The Listing Agreement is identical for all Indian Stock Exchanges, including the NSE and BSE. This clause is a recent addition to the Listing Agreement and was inserted as late as 2000 consequent to the recommendations of the Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee on CG constituted by SEBI in 1999. Clause 49, when it was first added, was intended to introduce some basic CG practices in Indian companies and brought in a number of key changes in governance and disclosures (many of which we take for granted today). In late 2002, the SEBI constituted the Narayana Murthy Committee to “assess the adequacy of current corporate governance practices and to suggest improvements.” Based on the recommendations of this committee, SEBI issued a modified Clause 49 on October 29, 2004 (the ‘revised Clause 49’) which...

Words: 4860 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...reviewing the performance of the chief executive 3. ensuring the availability of adequate financial resources. 4. approving annual budgets 5. accounting to the stakeholders for the organization’s performance 6. setting the salaries and compensation of company management. Sub committees Nomination and remuneration committees Nomination committees review and consider the structure and balance of the board and make recommendations regarding appointments, retirements and terms of office. The remuneration committee’s role is to ensure that remuneration arrangements support the strategic aims of the business and enable the recruitment, motivation and retention of senior executives while complying with the requirements of regulatory and governance bodies, satisfying the expectations of shareholders and remaining consistent with the expectations of the wider employee population. It will assume responsibilities to equitably, consistently and responsibly reward executives having regard to the performance of the corporation, the performance of the executive and the general pay environment. Audit committees the audit committee is a creation of the board of directors of the firm. Its membership is comprised of members of the board of directors. The primary role of the audit committee in most publicly traded companies is to assist the board of...

Words: 454 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Efficacy of Corporate Governance Contents 1. Definition of Corporate Governance 2. History of Corporate Governance – Pre and Post Liberalization 3. Objectives of Corporate Governance 4. Need of Corporate Governance 5. Framework of Corporate Governance 6. Principles of Corporate Governance in India and in the World 7. Merits and Demerits of Corporate Governance 8. Impact of Violation of Corporate Governance Laws 9. Case Study – a) Satyam b) Pfizer c) 3rd Company 10. Conclusion 11. Bibliography Definition "Corporate Governance is concerned with holding the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and communal goals. The corporate governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. The aim is to align as nearly as possible the interests of individuals, corporations and society"-(Sir Adrian Cadbury in 'Global Corporate Governance Forum', World Bank, 2000) Corporate governance is the relationship between corporate managers, directors and the providers of equity, people and institutions who save and invest their capital to earn a return. It ensures that the board of directors is accountable for the pursuit of corporate objectives and that the corporation itself conforms to the law and regulations. - International Chamber of Commerce Corporate Governance deals with laws, procedures, practices and implicit rules that...

Words: 25453 - Pages: 102

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...CORPORATE GOVERNANCE A system of checks and balances between the Board, Management and Investors to produce an efficiently functioning the corporation, ideally geared to produce long term value. ISSUES IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE * Asymmetry of power * Asymmetry of information * Interests of shareholders as residual owners * Role of owner management * Theory of separation of powers * Division of corporate pie among stakeholders CURRENT STATUS ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE * Insistence on forms and structures * Overarching regulations * Regulatory overkill * Lack of adequate number of strong, independent directors * Large liabilities for companies and officers Scope of Corporate Governance * “Corporate Governance is concerned with holding the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and communal goals. The governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. The aim is to align as nearly as possible the interest of individuals, corporations and society. * The foundation of any structure of corporate governance is disclosure. Openness is the basis of public confidence in the corporate system and funds will flow to centers of economic activity that inspire trust.” -Sir Adrian Cadbury. * “Shareholders role in governance is to appoint the directors and the auditors. Poor corporate governance has ruined companies...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Why corporate governance: Corporate governance is a multifaceted subject. An important part of corporate governance deals with accountability, fiduciary duty and mechanisms of auditing and control. In this sense, corporate governance players should comply with codes to the overall good of all constituents. Another important focus is economic efficiency, both within the corporation (best practices guidelines) as well as extremely (national institutional frameworks). The word ‘corporate governance’ has become a buzzword these days because of two factors. The first is that after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the cold war in 1990, it has become the conventional wisdom all over the world that market dynamics must prevail in economic matters. The concept of governmental controlling the commanding heights of the economy has been given up. This, in turn, has made the market the most decisive factor in settling economic issues. This has also coincided with the thrust given to globalization because of the setting up of the WTO and every member of the WTO trying to bring down the tariff barriers. Globalization involves the movement of four economic parameters namely, physical capital in terms of plant and machinery, financial capital in terms of money invested in capital markets or in FDI, technology, and labor moving across national borders. The pace of movement of financial capital has become greater because of the pervasive impact of information technology and the...

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...and ethical lapses have heightened people, press, and investor security of companies, creating demand for a corporate culture of integrity driven performance and a new corporate transparency. Management and boards now feel compelled to ensure that proper governance processes are in place to protect corporate reputation, brand image and share holder value. According to Pricewaterhouse Cooper’s 8th Annual global CEO survey (Dec 2004), 50% of retail industry CEOs believe that there is a strong relationship among all elements of GRC (governance, risk and compliance) and that effective governance can be a value driver and a benefit versus a cost, to their companies. Effective corporate governance requires management and board involvement, accountability, embracing the processes, compliance, and structure required to direct and manage the affairs of a corporation. Its overall goal is to ensure the financial viability to the enterprise and enhance share holder value. For the retail and customer industry, globalization, which entails multinational operations, various financial reporting systems, and complex supply chain with wholesalers, distributors, and multiple types of retailers, not to mention multiple brand portfolios, and various types of outlets, provides significant rationales for management and boards to develop an effective GRC program. Successful corporate governance depends largely on trade-off among the various conflicting interest groups like government, society, inventors...

Words: 15491 - Pages: 62