...is better than Dictatorship. Democracy is a process not an event. Democracy, like anything in world, has its significance and its disadvantages at the same time. So, the question arises as to what really is democracy and in what aspects is it different from dictatorship. Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people. Therefore, one can call democracy as the will of the people. This definition is self explanatory as to the advantages of democracy. How can a thing be the will of the people living in the land and still not be advantageous to them? This question explains that democracy is a cure to certain ills; it is the voice of people. However, democracy is not as clean as it looks from the outside, it does has its own foes that needs to be answered so for that purpose we are going to compare it with dictatorship and in conclusion establish which system is better than the other. Like democracy, dictatorship has also its own advantages and disadvantages. Dictatorship is believed to be a system where the power is centralized and rests with one person called the dictator. As it is a centralized system of governance it carries with it all the advantages a centralized system has and it has to cater to all the disadvantages a centralized system has to deal with. However, it is to be regretted in the very beginning that dictatorship has got a much worse of image as compared to democracy due to certain reasons, which is, dictatorship carries with it...
Words: 1563 - Pages: 7
...rich or poor people in a communist system. It stands for a stateless society where all are equal. On the other hand, Fascism was founded in Italy by Benito Mussolini. Fascism is the glorification of the state and it considers state on top of everything; believes in nationalism where state control everything. Communism means state ownership and fascism means state control. Fascism became popular between 1919 and 1945. Communism became popular after the Revolution of Russia in 1917. Fascism began to rise in Europe directly following the First World War because there was a fear of Socialism. The first nation where fascism rose to power was in Italy with Mussolini and his government. He created this ideology as the exact opposite of socialism and the way to combat the rise of socialism. He saw the rise of the Soviet Union and was afraid that they would move across Europe to force communism. Fascism has the government supporting private business instead of the government . In the start of communism people believe that everyone should be the same and not classified by a certain class. Where in Fascism takes the views of karl Marks but use his writing for ones use, and believe that the nationalism is the most important and one person should be in control of the people and the state with very little say by its people. Fascism is differently does not work because the people...
Words: 1529 - Pages: 7
...In 1823, the Mexican empire was overthrown and Nicaragua joined the United Provinces of Central America. Finally, on April 30th, 1838 Nicaragua declared its independence from the United Provinces, and established itself as a republic. Political Unrest During the 1840s and 50s, Nicaragua was characterized by political unrest. A power struggle ensued between liberals in the city of León and conservatives in the city of Granada. Continuous conflict tore the country apart, and eventually erupted into civil war. As a result, economic stability was difficult to maintain, influencing Nicaragua’s growth in years to come. In 1855, liberals invited United States military adventurer William Walker and his mercenaries to take part in the war. While he assisted the liberals in capturing the city of Granada, he suppressed the liberal’s leadership and appointed himself president. After one year in power, he was “captured and executed in Honduras in 1860” (Advameg Inc.). Conservatives then took power in 1863 and ruled for thirty...
Words: 1366 - Pages: 6
...power of various government ministries - especially in the presidential system of governing where the legislature is separate from the executive. 4. Executive Power = The power to execute, enforce, and administer law. Executive power in government is the President's power, given by the Constitution, to execute, enforce, and administer law. 5. Judicial Power = The power to interpret laws, to determine their meaning, and to settle disputes within the society. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. 6. Constitution = The body of fundamental laws setting out the principles, structures, and processes of a government. The United States Constitution was adopted in its original form on September 17, 1787. 7. Dictatorship = A form of government in which the leader has absolute power and authority. A dictatorship by nature gathers power to the person or group that takes control of a nation; a dictator's rule over his people is absolute, and his authority cannot be legally challenged. 8. Democracy = Any system of government in which leaders rule with consent of the citizens. A democracy is a form of government, with...
Words: 376 - Pages: 2
...The American people and the nations of the world endured six days of anxiety and tension, praying while they waited for the president’s order to be carried out. (Gow pg. 11) In addition to being a politician President Kennedy was also a historian. In his book Why England Slept he compares a democratic government with a dictatorship during a time of war. (Gow pg. 15) “The representatives of a democracy cannot run contrary to the basic wishes of the people in any game of bluff when the decision must be whether it will be peace of war, the fundamental instinct of man against war binds, the hands of democratic leaders. In a dictatorship, on the other hand, people are often powerless to impress their wishes on the dictator until it is too late....
Words: 270 - Pages: 2
...Dictatorship in Africa The early 20th century was marked by the development of several dictatorships, Western Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. In Africa, some countries have summers or are still run by men with evocative names like Kaddafi in Libya, and Mobutu in Congo ex Zaire. Dictatorship has several causes and also consequences, but there are also some solutions to fight this scourge. Dictatorship is a political system that almost always involves tyranny because it is directed by one man or sometimes a small group who hold all the powers: judicial, legislative and executive. Dictatorship is established and maintained by violence with the support of the army (coup or civil war). There are several causes for dictatorship in Africa. The first cause is the economic. When the people do not have jobs, they follow someone who can help them. For example we have Kaddafi who became president after economic crisis in Libya, and then he became a dictatorship and controls everything in the country of Libya. The second cause of dictatorship is the bait of gain. Some people just want power and they take it by force. It is the case of Mobutu, who just took power in Congo. He get help of some Europe’s countries. He was a dictatorship very cruel; and he was drinking the blood of people. Another cause of dictatorship is the inefficiency of parliaments. The countries under a command of a dictatorship does not have a real parliament because all the power is in the hands of the president...
Words: 1007 - Pages: 5
...Elective Dictatorship is the term used to describe the government and the Prime minister to be seen as having powers over the country that seem excessive. A government appointing as an elected dictatorship is likely to have a large majority over all other parties in the House of Commons. This essay will analise the arguments for and against the UK having an elected dictatorship. It will conclude that a proper dictatorship is never possible because the UK’s constitution is a democratic one and there are counter balances to accessive Prime ministerial powers. However when a government has a very large majority it can use its control over the House of Commons to make decisions that can seem to some as being dictatorial. Firstly, it can be argued that with a political party having a large majority of seats any law can be passed easily. For example, during Clement Attlee’s premiership in 1945 he created NHS even though many hospitals and medical professors were against it. Another example is Margaret Thatcher’s accomplishment of the ideology of privatisation in 1983 in opposition of trade unions which was an extremely powerful sectional pressure group. Secondly, when a political party has a large majority of seats in the House of Commons, only a few people can be against its ideologies. A good example of this is the ‘whipping system’. This is when a political party passed a new bill the ‘wips’ enforce backbenchers to vote for supporting their political party’s legislation. ...
Words: 623 - Pages: 3
... or to get money for petty things that are in no real danger of harming anyone. The issues posed here are that, as stated before, American’s are losing freedoms, and also another big issue is fairness. Hypothetically a cop could pull over someone for speeding, even if they are not, and the person pulled over has no say in it because it is the cop’s word versus the person pulled over’s word. Who would the court believe? The cop. Are there enough safety issues and people getting injured or killed from speeders for the Supreme Court to issue this ruling? Other situations where people are in the mercy of those in power are dictatorships. In dictatorships there are not nearly as many freedoms as the United States has. People do not have a say in authority and if they speak out or act out they will be punished. While I do not believe that the United States will get this bad, this new ruling that cops can cite speeders without a radar is a big step to American’s giving into the power of the...
Words: 278 - Pages: 2
...involvement in the Vietnam War will always be remembered, as he increased the American involvement in the matter of Vietnam. Due to this decision, the vision of the United States push towards peace and prosperity was distorted and reversed. Johnson was highly criticized due to Vietnam War and was succeeded by Richard Nixon who was a member of the Republican Party. Americans voted republican because the Democratic party was divided into different feuding fractions during the time of Lyndon. B. Johnson. The Doctrine of Johnson was articulated after the intervention of the Dominican Republic in United States in 1965. The domestic revolution was also declared by Johnson stating that intervention of Dominican Republic in the Western Hemisphere is not a local matter. The doctrine of Johnson is considered to be an extension of the Kennedy’s Doctrine. It is considered that this doctrine was proposed to oppose the movements of democracy in Latin America which was in favor of military dictatorship of right-wing in U.S (Levy 2002). Doctrine of Kennedy The doctrine of Kennedy was articulated by President John. F. Kennedy during 1961 and 1963. Kennedy raised his voice against the communism which was progressing in the Western Hemisphere. In 1961, President John. F. Kennedy presented guide lines upon which the future policy of the United States of America was supposed to formulate. He...
Words: 1272 - Pages: 6
...oppressive dictatorship. Fulgencio Batista had been Cuba's innovator for most of time since arriving to energy in an army hen house in 1933. He remained a master until 1940 when he formally became a chosen chief executive. The selection was not a reasonable one, but Batista honored the idea of democracy when he was beaten in the 1944 selection, and quietly passed energy over to his competitors. He had partners to US companies (and is alleged to have had partners to organized criminal activity, just like in Godfather Aspect 2). In 1951 he joined the competition to become President again, but when a study revealed him in last position he organized a second hen house and seized energy again. After the 1952 hen house Batista experienced large community disapproval and municipal disobedience, along with a revolt cause by Fidel Castro which was mashed (don't fear, Castro becomes essential again later). The US had many linked with Cuba, which legalized betting in and create an effort to woo United states travel and leisure. Prostitution also became very typical. Cuba encounters large extensive hardship because Batista put all the nation's sources into offering vacations for the wealthy Individuals in america he did company with. He announced an election in 1954, but with himself as the only lawful applicant. Student demonstrations and road riots became very typical and Batista organized energy only with the aid of an army that many suspicious was funded by the United States. Gradually...
Words: 1235 - Pages: 5
...between both countries. In the treaty, the United States government was obligated to pay Mexico fifteen-million dollars. In return for the compensation, The United States expanded its territory. The territory that was obtained via the treaty eventually became New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, Arizona, and some of Utah.[1] This treaty, especially in the long run, benefited both the United States and Mexico, but there are many arguments about why the war started. Some argue that the United States was power hungry and was continuing its “bulling” of the continent to fulfill their belief that it was God’s will for the United States to control the land from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. This has now become to be known as Manifest Destiny.[2] Then there are the counter arguments that the dictatorship of Mexico sent troops to invade the United States and killed Americans. In a message to congress on May 11, 1846, President James Polk said, “Mexico invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil.”[3] There are many arguments that say the United States is a racist nation and that this war, like many others, was because of white racism. Whether the battles were all racially motivated will never be known. It is impossible to know what was in the hearts of the Americans who fought in the war. What is know is that during that time Mexico was under an oppressive dictatorship and whether the motives of the United States were malicious or not, everyone should agree...
Words: 3628 - Pages: 15
...initiating any type of war. No other forms of government can provide this type of structure. I find the core of democracy very interesting , it improve the integrity of citizens. It gives each citizen, a sense of responsibility to develop and improve our country. Many countries accept the idea of democracy and it is also one of the core values of the United Nations. Dictatorship is a form of government in which one person possesses the absolute power without any constitutional limitation. The coming of dictatorship is usually unexpected. The old system cannot be restore and it's not ready for the alternatives of democracy. Because, it still requires great development and improvement with the right intentions. Adolf Hitler is one of the most well known dictators in history. A dictator usually tries to maintain strict control of educational and economical life. They also tend to control the media as well as the police and armed forces. Anyone disagreeing is subject to brutality because dissent is a threat to a dictator and people become prisoners for holding ideas deemed to be a threat to the State. I think the idea of dictatorship is too extreme to the point where is no longer necessary. I think...
Words: 286 - Pages: 2
...countries together. Culturally, Politically, and Socially, we as a society are vastly different from the culture of Zaire. Muhammed Ali brings unity to Zaire throughout 1974. PolyGam, the producer of this documentary chooses to show cultural differences. Zaire throws their lifestyle in the culture. The soothsayer shows up several times throughout the documentary. She remains a constant reminder that they are in fact in Zaire and that Muhammed Ali embraces the culture of Zaire. The soothsayer is a fundamental aspect of their culture. The soothsayer, is the fortune teller who performs and tells the audience what the future will hold for Zaire. This would never occur in the United States. Granted we have our occasional palm readings. But for the majority we just live our lives and find out what happens when it happens. Our American society is based on Manifest Destiny. Our Destiny will be what it will be and we can control it and change it throughout our lives. Culturally speaking, the conditions in which they live differentiate. As soon as the Americans working for Muhammed and Foreman, asked and needed air conditioning in their hotel rooms. The hotel only had a certain amount of air...
Words: 491 - Pages: 2
...How To: Use Comparing Strategies DQ3: HELPING STUDENTS PRACTICE AND DEEPEN THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF NEW KNOWLEDGE Element 17 Examining Similarities and Differences Comparing is the process of identifying similarities and differences between ideas or things. A variety of strategies can be used when designing comparison activities. We will discuss sentence stems, Venn diagrams, double bubble diagrams and comparison matrices. Sentence Stem Comparisons This strategy can be used to have the students compare and contrast people, characters, places, events, concepts or processes. The comparisons can be general or specific. Marzano’s Becoming a Reflective Teacher, gives the following examples: General – House cats are similar to lions because ____________________. House cats are different than lions because _______________________. Specific – Sherlock Holmes and Gandalf are both characters who enjoy solving mysteries, but they are different because ____________________________. After a gym teacher has provided a series of critical-input experiences on baseball and fast pitch softball, he might assign a sentence stem assignment comparing and contrasting the two sports. A completed example can be found in Marzano’s A Handbook for the Art and Science of Teaching and looks something like this. Baseball and fast pitch softball are similar because they both… • Have 4 bases in a diamond shape • Have 9 defensive players. • Have the same ball/strike counts: 4 balls = walk & 3 strikes = out ...
Words: 1388 - Pages: 6
...say in the Government with the major Government decisions being made by the two powers who were by then ruling over Germany and deliberating on its issues. However, in 1949 two states emerged, which were East Germany and the West Germany. The West Germany also known as the Federal Republic of Germany was a democracy with a parliament, labor unions and with a capitalist economy. Eastern Germany was a dictatorship led by the Soviet Union called the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED). The West German rule was better that the dictatorship kind of governance by the Soviet Union. The German citizens in the East Germany got oppressed with their voices not hearkened to by the Soviet Union set up government. The detrimental dictatorship rule by Adolf Hitler was once more reincarnated by the Soviet Union[3]. The leader of West Germany by then was Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, the country under his rule experienced an economic miracle becoming the most prosperous economy in Europe by then. All these series of events took center stage in the year 1955. West Germany formed strong foreign relationships with countries like France, United States and Israel. East Germany was doing so well economically with its populace having better standards of living as compared to those in West Germany. The Marxist-Leninist dictatorship government in East Germany made the government stagnate economically because the organization of the economy was selfish to serve the self-interests of the Soviet Union.Moreover...
Words: 1182 - Pages: 5
