Originalism verse Living Constitutionalism, which do you prefer?

Originalism is the belief that the Constitution should be based on what our founding fathers intended it to be, and Living Constitutionalism is the belief of changing the intent of the Constitution as time changes.
I find Living Constitutionalism most desirable. Living Constitutionalism seems most desirable to me because I feel that even that the laws were written so long ago times change and people change as time goes on. With that being said laws have to be interpreted differently. I think with Living Constitutionalism it helps us (the people) with today’s time. I think that people are changing daily and the laws have to be interpreted in today’s views, if they are not then you would not have the difference in people. Everyone would be more the same. …show more content…
The world would never change if people and things did not. If people and things change then the laws of the people does not necessarily have to change but has to be reasonable to people of today’s world. Living Constitutionalist believes in equality. They believe that everyone should be treated equally and everyone should have equal rights. They do not believe anyone should be discriminated against.
I think Originalism was good in the early years of the Constitution, but in this day and time people changes and violent changes, therefor the laws has to best fit the people of the current time. Things such as hangings and burning of people seemed to be fair back then, but now days it seems too harsh. I think that Originalism in today’s world would be infringing on peoples dignity and