Free Essay

Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians and the Plebeians

In:

Submitted By mmoore32
Words 874
Pages 4
University of the People,
HIST 1421 Greek and Roman Civilization,
Written Assignment 3

Intro: The Republic of Rome was not composed of one sole roman people, they were subdivided into two classes known as the patricians and plebeians. Despite living in close proximity, these two groups were put into separate social strata. Although both classes had rights, the patricians did not share the full rights of the people with their neighbors the plebeians. The economics and political differences became so great that eventually lead to a revolt by the plebeians within Rome.

Body: In Ancient Rome, the patricians were the wealthy landowners who lived within the city and had their properties work by slaves. These men were composed of the aristocrats, noblemen and upper ruling class in Rome. The plebeian class consequently was made up of the commoners and other free Romans such as the farmers, merchants, architects and artisans. Despite the fact that quite a few of the plebeians had a abundance of wealth, they were still considered lower class and could not join the upper echelons of the ruling powers. The Roman nation during this time was going through a uprising, as they became increasingly intolerant of their tyrannical kings. In a act of this rebellious sentiment, the patricians and plebeians worked together to rid themselves of the monarchies. After disposing of the monarchs in Rome, they began to assemble new politics, created voting assemblies and instituted laws, such as Valerian Laws, that condemned those trying to become a king as a traitor to the nation. Unfortunately, despite the working united to create a republic, a majority of the power fell into the hands of the patricians. For example, the power in the assemblies were not equal. "The plebeians could, it is true, still vote in the comitia centuriata, but they could not hold any of the new offices, nor could they sit in the senate." (Morey, n.d.)

This, in of itself, might not have been that terrible, but the patricians began to use their political power in impertinently towards the plebeian class. While the patricians lived a lavish lifestyle and callously flaunted their riches and exerting little effort to assist the poor. From the perspective of the plebeians, they were acting no better than the kings they had helped to overthrow. The plebeians were still composed of the farmers and commoners, living outside the city in the countryside. When wars would come, as they inevitably do, the plebeians would suffer more than those of the patricians, who were protected by the city walls. As was aforementioned, a majority of the plebian class was made up of the farmers and builders, therefore, they would have to leave their land unattended to serve in the military. These absences would inevitably have dire consequences for the plebeians. When these men served in the army, they would have to leave the land unattended and this lead to the property being either ruined due to neglect or ravaged by enemy forces. With their land typically destroyed and their families driven away while they served their country, they lost their home, fields and way of life. While their neighboring countrymen were under great distress, the patricians made the animosity greater by adding fuel to the fire. They took advantage of the downtrodden state of the plebeians by creating inequitable law of debt. Without money, their property destroyed and most of their possessions claimed by enemies during the war, plebeians needed to turn to the patricians for assistance. This led to them becoming debtors to the patricians that were loaned money, receiving harsh penalties if the debt couldn't be reimbursed. As a result of this policy of debt in addition to the failure of the assembly to provide for the wellbeing of the plebeians, they decided to secede from Rome, traveling to the mountain of Mons Sacer. After coming to terms with the fact that Rome couldn't function without the plebeians, the patricians began dialogue with their countrymen. The two group were able to come to a negotiated resolution, the patricians releasing some of the plebs from the debt and creating a office of the Tribune of the Plebs.

Conclusion: While the patricians and plebeian were tied together, they had an abundance of disparity and conflicts. With the combination of plebeians not being able to sit in the senate/ not being allowed to hold office, along with the destruction of their land, the crushing debt placed upon them by the patricians was inevitably more than enough to cause the decision to withdraw from Rome. The difficulties were simply the most pronounce of the myriad that plagued Rome at the time. The spoils of war had been unequally divided and distributed by the ruling patricians as well as the public land among other things. It should go without saying that a plebeian upheaval was bound to occur.

REFERENCE

Morey, W. (n.d.). Greek Government. Retrieved on 11th July, 2016 from http://www.forumromanum.org/history/index.html
Rymer, E. (2014). Plebeians in Ancient Rome, Retrieved on 11th July, 2016 from http://historylink101.com/2/Rome/roman-plebeians.htm
Munro, R. (n.d.). Patricians and Plebeians, Retrieved on 11th July, 2016 from http://rightsandresponsibilitiesofrome.weebly.com/patricians-and-plebeians.html

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Patricians Vs Plebeians Essay

...king true power was held by citizens. Patricians were in noble class while Plebeians were in lower class. Not too long these two groups began to clash because of political and monetary segregation. Economic Differences between Patricians and Plebeians Patricians were a wealthy set of people who lived in the city and their property was secured within the city. Then again Plebeians were poor, lived in the wide open and their firm and property was generally unprotected. While Plebeians were serving in the military for securing the nation, their own particular property was frequently destroyed by their adversaries....

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Patricians And Plebeians Research Paper

...people, the Patricians and the Plebeians had a common enemy, the kings. Working together they gained victory over the kings, driving them from the land. The victory would require a united front, yet once the battle was over and Rome became a republic, it was obvious the equality was not shared by all. A long struggle for political power and equality for the Plebeians would be a battle of the wealthy verses the poor (Morey, 1901). Discussion Discuss how the economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt. Include in your discussion the results of the first revolt or secession. The Patricians were the aristocrats, once the kingship was over, the power belonged to them. The Patricians held all the political offices and senate seats. Wealth and oppression of the poor were their allies. The Patricians lived inside the city walls, protected from invading forces. Being able to occupy public land and utilize it as their own was another benefit strictly given to the Patricians. To further distance themselves from the Plebeians, loans would be made to the poor, which when unpaid would result in the acquisition of a slave, (the former debtor) (Morey, 1901). The Plebeians were the commoners and peasants, their profit...

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Plebeian Classes

...The many economic and political differences between the patrician and plebeian classes caused a lot of civil unrest in Ancient Rome. These discrepancies led to a disparaging difference in the quality of life for Roman citizens. The plebeian class was disgruntled to an extreme, and eventually they began to lead revolts against the aristocratic republic that they felt held them down. Around the time of B.C. 500, the Roman community had two people’s assemblies: the Comitia Curiata and Comitia Centuriata. For a long time, the Comitia Curiata was the only legal representation that the Roman populus had (Encyclopedia Britannica Online, par. 2). The Curiata was, of course, made up of only patricians. The patricians were the wealthy citizens. The Curiata was originally given the responsibility of electing Consuls, passing laws, and trying judicial cases. With the creation of the Comitia Centuriata, the importance of the Curiata began a slow decline. The Plebeian class was allowed to participate in the Comitia Centuriata, but the organization tended to serve the interests of the elite. The Comitia Centuriata...

Words: 588 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Patricia's Rights

...The Roman Republic was comprised of the Patricians and the Plebeian classes. These two classes were not treated the same. They had different rights in terms of economic and political aspects. Both groups had some rights, not like pure slaves, their rights were only different from the two groups. Due to the fact that they had different rights, this is attributed to the cause of Plebeian revolt which took place inside Rome. Between the two groups, the Patricians were the richest and these were landlords. The Patricians had their own houses, they also had villas which were run by slaves. The Patricians were well respected and everyone treated them as upper - class people who were in – charge of the slaves and were. On the other hand, the Plebeian were considered as free Romans and these were just commoners. The Plebeian were considered as just ordinary people and they were treated just like that. These were workers who were who did various jobs like building, farming, merchants artisans etc. Because the Kings treated the Plebeian as slaves, the Plebeian got fed -up with such treatment and started making some changes. They started making new laws and some political changes like the valerian...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Roman Civilization

...Author: Mashell Chapeyama Institution: University of the People Course: History Bachelor’s Degree Selected essays on Roman Civilization Plebeian revolt There are a number of causes that led to the first revolt by the Plebeians. Some of the causes of the revolt are poor distribution of land, poverty among the Plebeians, and the harsh debt law that affected the plebs. This essay will discuss the causes of the first Plebeian revolt as well as the results of the revolt. One of the main causes of the plebeian revolt was the existence of poverty among the Plebeians. The poverty was a result of the actions of the Patrician, in some ways. What happened was that the Plebs assisted the Patrician to expel the kings from Rome and led to a republican state. The fight against the kings left the plebs in a very worse off condition. Since the patricians lived in the city, during the war their property would remain secure. The city was guarded by walls. However, since the plebs lived in the countryside, which was not guarded, their property was greatly destroyed during the wars. The plebs’ fields were destroyed as much as their property. The destruction of the property and fields was possible since the Plebs men were fighting in the wars leaving their homes unprotected. So, whereas the men were fighting during the wars their properties and fields were being plundered, making them very poor at the end of the wars. So the Plebs were not happy that their properties and fields were being...

Words: 9212 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Greek and Roman Comparison

...Greek and Roman Comparison Lisa Lain HIS275CA June 1, 2015 Zachary Lenz Greek and Roman Comparison The Greek and Roman empires were very important to the history of the world. With their empires came religions and philosophies. While their religions were much different, both the Greeks and the Romans turned to Christianity at some point. Their philosophies were also quite different. They each studied the building blocks of the universe and created their own theories. With any empire come societal struggles. Both the Greek and Roman empires dealt with such struggles but the main aspect of the struggles varied. Territorial expansion was very important in both the Greek and the Roman empires. They both sought out to find more land and fought for the land they found through wars and battles. Trade and commerce were a major contribution to both empires as well. While both empires traded different things both within their empires, they also traded outside of it. The Roman and Greek civilizations also dealt with a decline in civilization. The reasoning behind their declines was different, but both empires contributed to their own decline. Religions and Philosophies While the Greek and Roman religions differed greatly, they both turned to Christianity at one point. In the beginning religions, the Greeks and Romans alike believed in many gods. Each of these gods was believed to be a god of certain events. Both the Greek and the Romans worshipped their gods at temples...

Words: 6976 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Is the United States Following in the Footsteps of Ancient Rome’s Decline?

...factors supporting this are that the U.S. is the economic leader in the world. At this time, the U.S. has the strongest military of any nation. There is relevance with what is happening in the United States today and what occurred during the fall of the Roman Empire. One common and provable fact is that in many ways history does have a tendency to repeat itself. Not only on a worldwide scale does this happen, but in the lives of individuals as well. After all, governments and their political entities are made up people. And as part of human nature, people are prone to make the same mistakes again and again, as the Roman Empire and the U.S. similarities and differences in the functioning of the state. The Roman Empire established a connection between the state and the people. The people were subjected respectively by pride in their country. Their pride was extremely strong in a nation who offered a stable and profound class society. They government’s hierarchy included a military emperor or Sacrificial King, senate, consuls, and the forum. The Romans also enacted a class society of peasant farmers, patricians and plebeians, who were among the higher level in the class society. Ruled by a dictator, the Roman Empire was under strict control. The early and late Roman Empire was a powerful dominating group in its time. It conquered many other nations and influenced culture around the west of the world. The Roman Empire created political ideologies through literature and through action...

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Fall of Rome and the Emergence of the Roman Empire

...Oscar Villanueva Why the Roman Republic Decayed and Became the Roman Empire The rise and subsequent fall of the city of Rome was a significant historical event, characterized by the dramatic decline of the republic, to her transformation into an empire. Originally a small provincial town, Rome rose to prominence and produced astounding strengths, which was then lost when Rome became incapable of defending its governing structures of the republic. It is the purpose of this study to highlight these events, giving reasons that led to the decay of the Roman Republic, and the rise of the Roman Empire. The prominence of Rome Rome was a small province town which after many wars became the focus and command center of the vast empire of Rome. However, history tells us that it took hundreds of years and a combat of many wars to rise to this prominence. It gained influence over a significant portion of southern Europe, northern Africa, and Middle East. Rome conquered nearly all the surrounding territories going beyond the Mediterranean Sea. It was this military dominance in the region that helped the Roman republic rise and became a formidable force of influence. The republic had appeasing methods of keeping her citizens happy and content. In this endeavor, Rome respected and protected the people’s local cultures with the sole purpose of keeping the people pacified. The Romans in their quest for improved stability, offered a healthier way of life to...

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Foundation Review

...society? Similarities and differences between them? (article) What is the definitions AND significance of the following? Rome Etruscans Latins Republic Greeks- influence? Patrician Legions Plebeian Senate Consuls Centuriate Assembly Tribal Assembly Tribunes Veto- Who had it? Praetors- How many? Twelve Tables Citizenship- who had it? Women? Times of emergency, who ruled? “Real Power” Geography? Punic Wars Hannibal? Scipio? Tiberius & Gaius Gracchus? Civil War Period? Shift from Republic to Empire? Describe Loyalty of soldier? Julius Caesar Triumvirate Crassus Pompey Ides of March Octavian? Augustus? Pax Romana? Trade system? Basis? Succession to throne? Gladiators? Entertainment? Problems with Empire? Why the Fall-specifics? Diocletian? Constantine? Huns? Germanic invasions? Attila? Byzantine Empire Romulus Augustulus? Virgil? Roman Achievements? The major contribution to Western CIF.? Dates of Republic/Empire/Byzantine Trajan? Arch/Architecture? Infrastructure? Greatest Roman Legacy? Gupta Major accomplishments of each Empire? Mauryan Chandragupta Maurya? Indian geography? Invasions into India? Arthashastra Ashoka Maurya? Kautilya? Buddhism and Hinduism? Brahmin? Collapse? Patriarchal/Matriarchal? Chandra Gupta? White Huns? Tamil? Trade patterns/partners? Guild? Political stability? Dates/TL of...

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Federal Gov

... b. Kick back scheme is about giving out contracts and then they give money of the government money back to the person to the beginning. c. Niccolo Machiavelli “The Prince” 15, 16 century and condemned by the Catholic Church. Nic and Machiavelli was used by shakespear and the Nick-name was derived from it. Use of the nick name was mostly used to disassociate from the vast amount of evil doing. 2) Political Philosophy and Political theory d. Asks normative as well as empirical question. i. Normative is about value such as the best form of government and justice ii. Empirical is more about factual such as the amount of states or colonies. 1. Aristottle 5th BC and teacher of natural law theory and about natural inequality. a. Very similar about the natural rights theory of John locke’s, written some time in the 1680s. This are the same as the one that Thomas Jefferson’s work in the Declaration of Independence. That by, nature have the right to have the same amount of equality of political rights. e. Karl Marx – founder of the ideal of the communism in Europe. Social democratic of the western Europe derive from the ideas of Marx. The Russian social democratic party. f. John Jack Rousseau – people in primitive society were better off morality than the one in the current because the current corrupt our hearts. g. Transperancy.org and surveys all countries of the world and rates...

Words: 4651 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Revisiting, Revising, and Reviving America's Founding Era

...Most Americans nowadays like to think that they have the American Revolution pretty well figured out. Conventional wisdom starts the saga in 1763 when Britain, saddled with debt at the close of the Seven Years' War, levied new taxes that prompted her American colonists to resist, and then to reject, imperial rule. Having declared independence and defeated the British, American patriots then drafted the constitution that remains the law of the land to this day. With George Washington's inauguration as president in 1789, the story has a happy ending and the curtain comes down. This time-honored script renders the road from colonies to nation clear, smooth, and straight, with familiar landmarks along the way, from Boston's Massacre and Tea Party through Lexington and Concord, then on to Bunker Hill and Yorktown before reaching its destination: Philadelphia in 1787, where the Founders invented a government worthy of America's greatness. Those Founders are equally familiar. Washington and Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison, Sam and John Adams, Patrick Henry and Alexander Hamilton: in the popular mind this band of worthies, more marble monuments than mere mortals, guides America towards its grand destiny with a sure and steady hand. "[F]or the vast majority of contemporary Americans," writes historian Joseph Ellis, the birth of this nation is shrouded by "a golden haze or halo."(1) So easy, so tame, so much "a land of foregone conclusions" does America's Revolution...

Words: 6252 - Pages: 26

Free Essay

Federal Gov

... b. Kick back scheme is about giving out contracts and then they give money of the government money back to the person to the beginning. c. Niccolo Machiavelli “The Prince” 15, 16 century and condemned by the Catholic Church. Nic and Machiavelli was used by shakespear and the Nick-name was derived from it. Use of the nick name was mostly used to disassociate from the vast amount of evil doing. 2) Political Philosophy and Political theory d. Asks normative as well as empirical question. i. Normative is about value such as the best form of government and justice ii. Empirical is more about factual such as the amount of states or colonies. 1. Aristottle 5th BC and teacher of natural law theory and about natural inequality. a. Very similar about the natural rights theory of John locke’s, written some time in the 1680s. This are the same as the one that Thomas Jefferson’s work in the Declaration of Independence. That by, nature have the right to have the same amount of equality of political rights. e. Karl Marx – founder of the ideal of the communism in Europe. Social democratic of the western Europe derive from the ideas of Marx. The Russian social democratic party. f. John Jack Rousseau – people in primitive society were better off morality than the one in the current because the current corrupt our hearts. g. Transperancy.org and surveys all countries of the world and rates...

Words: 4651 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Economics: Changes over the Centuries

...ECONOMICS: CHANGES OVER THE CENTURIES LANDON COPE HISTORY 202 NOVEMBER 5, 2009   INTRODUCTION This report attempts to uncover the changing attitudes towards economics in the world over the course of several centuries. Several articles will be examined in an attempt to trade how basic attitudes, approaches, beliefs, ideas, and values concerning economics have changed over time. The articles being examined are (1) The Wealth of Nation by Adam Smith, (2) The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and (3) Japan’s Gross National Cool by Douglass McGray. The Wealth of Nations was published in 1776 and will represent the earliest of the works being examined here. Smith explains economic principles such as self-interest, supply and demand, and free marketplace. From this work we see the unraveling of capitalism and the paradigm of free trade. This work set the premise for many works to follow, including The Communist Manifesto. The Communist Manifesto is an influential political manuscript that outlines the problems with capitalism and the struggles between classes. Communism is trumpeted here, as well as conditions necessary for a transition to communism. This work was written in 1848 and represents a stark contrast to The Wealth of Nations in principle and in theory. Much has resulted from this manuscript and its ideas as can still be seen in the world today. Lastly, Japan’s Gross National Cool represents modern economic thought. Written in 2002, its...

Words: 3008 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

World Civilisation

...HUM 1000: WORLD CIVILIZATIONS NOTES BY DR. KAKAI P.W THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF CIVILIZATION IN AFRICA Definition of key terms As we begin this course, it is crucial to first discuss our understanding of the concept ‘civilization’. This is a comparative term which is usually applied in comparison to such words as ‘barbarian’ ‘savage’ and ‘primitive’. In classical antiquity the Europeans used the word ‘barbarian’ to refer to a foreigner who was regarded as inferior (Ogutu and Kenyanchui, An Introduction To African History, 1991 p33). Do you think this is still the way we use the word barbarian? The Latin speakers referred to hunters, food-gatherers as savage. In the 17th century this term ‘savage’ referred to a person without art, literacy, or society who lived in fear of existence and death. ‘Primitive’ on the other hand, in Latin meant ‘the first or original’. Europeans used these words interchangeably when referring to non-Europeans while the word civilization was preserved to describe historical developments of European people (ibid). Now the term civilization is no longer confined to the above development but also extends reference to non-European communities. Attributes of civilization includes observance to law, belonging to an organized society, having a society of literate people with advanced developments in urbanization, agriculture, commerce, arts and technology. The French thinkers of the 18th century referred to a person of the arts and literature...

Words: 29345 - Pages: 118

Premium Essay

Business

...The main thrust of Durkheim's overall doctrine is his insistence that the study of society must eschew reductionism and consider social phenomena sui generis. Rejecting biologistic or psychologistic interpretations, Durkheim focused attention on the social-structural determinants of mankind's social problems. Durkheim presented a definitive critique of reductionist explanations of social behavior. Social phenomena are "social facts" and these are the subject matter of sociology. They have, according to Durkheim, distinctive social characteristics and determinants, which are not amenable to explanations on the biological or psychological level. They are external to any particular individual considered as a biological entity. They endure over time while particular individuals die and are replaced by others. Moreover, they are not only external to the individual, but they are "endowed with coercive power, by . . . which they impose themselves upon him, independent of his individual will." Constraints, whether in the form of laws or customs, come into play whenever social demands are being violated. These sanctions are imposed on individuals and channel and direct their desires and propensities. A social fact can hence be defined as "every way of acting, fixed or not, capable of exercising on the individual an external constraint." Although in his early work Durkheim defined social facts by their exteriority and constraint, focusing his main concern on the operation of the legal...

Words: 20388 - Pages: 82