Free Essay

Enrolment Decisions: Factors Influencing Students in Selecting Higher Educational Institution

In: Business and Management

Submitted By janikko24
Words 5326
Pages 22
2012 National Research Report

Why Did They Enroll?
The Factors Influencing College Choice
An analysis of traditional-aged students
What matters to students when deciding where to enroll?
There are a variety of factors that influence a student’s decision to enroll. Factors such as cost and the availability of financial aid are universally important at all types of institutions. However, other factors can vary widely by institution type, demographics, class level, and whether the student enrolled at his or her top choice. Every year, hundreds of campuses administer the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory™ (SSI) to their students. In addition to more than 70 items rated for importance and satisfaction on the general student experience, the SSI includes nine items that address factors in a student’s decision to enroll. During the fall of 2011, more than 55,000 students from more than 100 public and private fouryear and two-year institutions completed the SSI. These students rated the factors to enroll items on a scale of one (meaning not important at all) to seven (very important). This report details the responses from the nationwide pool of data. In particular, this report has a special emphasis on the nearly 22,000 first-year students who responded in order to see which items scored higher with ratings of important or very important (a ranking of six or seven on the answer scale). Comparisons with upperclass students and between students at their first-choice institution versus those attending their second- or third-choice institution are also provided. In addition, the report highlights trend results in enrollment factors as originally reported in our recent 15-year satisfaction trend reports.

About the study
This study Inventory during the fall of 2011 at colleges and universities nationwide. includes a comparison Table 1: Participants between Number of first-year Institution type institutions students and Four-year private colleges and students who 63 universities have been Four-year public colleges and 9 enrolled universities two years Community, junior, and technical 14 colleges or more (upperclass Two-year career and private 32 schools students).
Total

The study is based on data gathered from students who completed the Student Satisfaction

Total number of student records
25,070 11,277 11,859 7,607 55,813
TM

118

The full list of contributing institutions can be found in the appendix.

These schools provide a cross section of the student experience. The focus of the data is from the fall semester because that is when enrollment factors are likely to be most current in the minds of students, especially first-year students. This year’s study provides comparisons between first-year students and students who have been enrolled two years or more (upperclass students). There is also a comparison between two groups of first-year students: those who perceive themselves to be at their first-choice institution and those who identify the institution as their second or third choice. This report focuses on traditional college students. A separate study is available on the factors to enroll for students in adult learner undergraduate or graduate programs and students enrolled in online learning programs.

2 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Demographic mix of respondents
Class level for all students at all institutions Institutional choice (first-year students only)

42% 58%

36%

64%

TM

TM

First-year students Upperclass students

First-year, first-choice students First-year, second- and third-choice students

Specific information regarding the demographic distribution by institution type is included in the appendix.

What factors are considered?
The following list describes each available factor that students rate on the Student Satisfaction Inventory. • Cost: Addresses how important tuition was in the student’s decision to enroll. • Financial aid: Takes into consideration the financial aid package that was offered to the student. • Academic reputation: Reflects what the student thinks he or she knows about the academic quality of the institution. • Size of the institution: Indicates how important the size of the institution, either large or small, was to the student. • Recommendations from family and friends: Reflects the importance of comments and encouragements from family members. • Geographic setting: Addresses campus location as a factor because of distance from home as well as the setting of the school (urban, rural, etc.). • Campus appearance: Considers how the campus looks to the student and may also reflect perceptions of campus maintenance. • Personalized attention prior to enrollment: Indicates the student’s perception of how he or she was treated through the admissions process.

These factors may also have influence for specific institutions:
• Opportunity to play sports: For four-year and community college campuses, examines how critical the opportunity to compete athletically was to the student. • Employment opportunities: Reveals a factor unique to the career and private school version of the Student Satisfaction Inventory and indicates the student’s perceptions regarding career options with a degree from the institution.

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 3

Factors to enroll: First-year students
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
TM
83% 81% 81% 79% 84% 86% 79% 75% 71% 64% 63% 70% 72% 68% 63% 58% 50% 49%50% 45% 56% 62% 63% 54% 84% 75% 68% 61% 59% 80% 78% 82%

Four-year private first-year students Four-year public first-year students Community college first-year students Career school first-year students

Cost, financial aid, and academic reputation were the top factors across all institution types.

Cost

Financial aid

Academic reputation

Size of institution

Recommend from family

Geographic setting

Campus Personalized appearance attention prior to enrollment

This chart lists the eight enrollment factors that are consistent on the Student Satisfaction Inventory across all four institution types. The percentage reflects students indicating that the item is important or very important.

What is most important to first-year students?
Cost, financial aid, and academic reputation were the top enrollment factors across all institution types. These three variables appear to play a critical role in influencing students’ enrollment decisions. The other factors included in the list of choices were all more important to students at career schools than they were to students at four-year private and public colleges or community colleges, especially personalized attention prior to enrollment. It should be noted that employment opportunities, which is a unique item on the career-school survey and is not included in the chart above, was the top enrollment factor for these institutions, with 89 percent of students indicating it was important or very important to their decision. Certainly the cost of attending a college—regardless of the type of institution attended—played a role in enrollment decisions. With students attending public four-year and two-year campuses, cost was the dominant factor. At four-year private colleges, it ranked third behind academic reputation. At two-year career schools, cost—while still important with an 81 percent score—was fifth behind employment opportunities, financial aid, academic reputation, and personalized attention. Financial aid joined cost at the top of the enrollment factors and was the top issue for students at four-year private campuses. At two-year private institutions, financial aid was a close second behind employment opportunities, with nearly 86 percent saying it was important. Clearly, economic issues— how much will their educations cost, how will they pay for it—weigh heavily on the minds of students. Even the top enrollment factor from students at career schools, future career opportunities, indicates a strong economic concern. Academic reputation was also a strong factor, ranking as one of the top three enrollment factors across all institution types, with at least 70 percent of students indicating it was important or very important.

4 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Factors to enroll: Comparison of first-year students and upperclass students
While enrollment factors may be top of mind to first-year students, it is also interesting to observe the perceptions of upperclass students (sophomores, juniors, and seniors at four-year institutions and secondand third-year students at two-year institutions). It should be noted that upperclass responses could reflect either students’ original decision to enroll or their current decision to continue their enrollment into the coming year—the survey does not specifically ask if they are ranking their original enrollment factors. Either way, the responses provide an indication of the relative importance of these factors to upperclass students. Four-year private institutions: First-year students vs. upperclass students
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
TM 33.7% 29.0% 62.9% 56.4% 48.9% 48.7% 57.7% 51.6% 53.9% 62.4% 78.5% 76.2% 83.9% 83.8% 79.1% 77.8% 68.1% 62.7%

Four-year private first-year students Four-year private upperclass students

0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic Campus setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports

At four-year privates, the factors of financial aid and family recommendation were relatively unchanged as enrollment factors when comparing class levels. All of the factors were as or more important to first-year students. Campus appearance had the biggest movement between first-year and upperclass students with an 8.5 percentage point shift down in importance, followed by a 6.5 percentage point shift down in importance for institution size for upperclass students. Four-year public institutions: First-year students vs. upperclass students
80% 70% 60% 50% 40%
33.2% 80.5% 79.2% 79.6% 77.5% 75.2% 74.9% 64.2% 60.5% 49.7% 45.5% 66.2% 63.1% 63.4% 55.6% 61.3% 56.3%

Four-year public first-year students Four-year public upperclass students

30% 20% 10% 0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Campus Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports
TM 23.0%

For students at four-year publics, the perception of academic reputation was unchanged based on class level. Geographic setting actually became more important to upperclass students by 3.1 percentage points. The opportunity to play sports had the biggest drop in importance between firstyear students and upperclass students with a 10.2 percentage point shift down, followed by campus appearance with a 7.8 percentage point decrease in importance to upperclass students.
© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 5

Community colleges: First-year students vs. second- and third-year students
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
TM 23.7% 22.1% 49.9% 49.3% 45.3% 44.8% 83.0% 83.0% 78.1% 76.3%

Community college first-year students
71.2% 71.0% 60.2% 55.8% 59.1% 57.5%

Community college second- and thirdyear students

53.6% 53.6%

0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic Campus setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports

With a potentially shorter span of time for first-year students at community colleges to students in their second or possibly third year, there were fewer shifts in perceptions for factors in the decision to enroll, with many items maintaining the same percentage. The one exception is geographic setting, which was slightly more important by 4.4 percentage points for second- and third-year students as compared with first-year students. Career and private schools: First-year students vs. second- and third-year students
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Recommend Geographic Future setting from employment family opportunities Campus Personalized appearance attention prior to enrollement
TM
81.0% 76.5% 85.7% 83.5% 83.5% 80.7% 69.6% 66.8% 89.2% 86.1% 81.7% 77.7% 68.0% 63.7% 72.0% 69.8% 74.6% 71.5%

Career school first-year students Career school second- and thirdyear students

First-year students at two-year career and private schools indicated slightly higher importance scores on all items, with the recommendations from family and friends as well as personalized attention prior to enrollment reflecting the greatest difference by 4 percentage points compared with second- and third-year students. Again, the percentages stayed relatively consistent across the class level designations.

6 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Factors to enroll: Comparison for first-year students at their firstchoice institution vs. second and third choice
Students who perceived themselves to be at their first-choice institutions were typically more satisfied with their overall experience than students who perceived themselves to be at their second- or thirdchoice institution. While we don’t know why an institution was a first or second choice for a student, we can see which factors may have influenced enrollment when we slice the data for just first-year students with the additional indicator of institutional choice. Four-year private institutions: First-year students, first choice vs. first-year students, second and third choice
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
TM 39.4% 30.6% 80.6% 77.4% 84.1% 83.7% 81.4% 74.5% 70.1% 64.4% 60.1% 50.5% 45.6% 62.5% 62.2% 64.3%

Four-year private first-year, firstchoice students Four-year private first-year, secondand third-choice students

57.9% 57.5%

0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Campus Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports

Interestingly, the perception of financial aid as a factor in the decision to enroll was basically the same for students at their first choice and those at their second or third choice. The opportunity to play sports was 8.8 percentage points more important to students at their second- or third-choice school, followed by cost with a higher importance of 3.2 percentage points. Academic reputation was 6.9 percentage points more important to students at their first-choice institution followed by the personalized attention prior to enrollment, which was more important by 5.8 percentage points. Four-year public institutions: First-year students, first choice vs. first-year students, second and third choice
83.8% 83.8% 76.8% 75.5% 73.7% 65.5% 61.8% 51.1% 47.6% 38.7% 29.6% 67.5% 65.4% 60.3% 56.2% 61.4% 61.1%

80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

78.3%

Four-year public first-year, firstchoice students Four-year public first-year, secondand third-choice students

TM

0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic Campus setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports

For students at four-year public institutions, the perceptions of academic reputation and personalized attention prior to enrollment were the same across institutional choice, but geographic setting was
© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 7

more important to students at their first choice by 11.3 percentage points, with campus appearance having the next biggest difference of 5.1 percentage points. For students at their second or third choice, the opportunity to play sports was more important by 9.1 percentage points, financial aid more important by 7 percentage points, and the perception of cost more important by 5.5 percentage points. Community colleges: First-year students, first choice vs. first-year students, second and third choice
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Personalized Opportunity Recommend Geographic Campus setting appearance attention prior from to play to enrollement family sports
TM 27.1% 21.9% 51.3% 47.0% 48.4% 39.2% 83.0% 82.9% 79.4% 75.7%

73.7% 66.3% 58.5% 50.7% 55.0% 50.8% 61.0% 55.3%

Community College first-year, firstchoice students Community College first-year, secondand third-choice students

First-choice students at community colleges placed a higher importance on the recommendations from their family and friends by 9.2 percentage points, followed by geographic setting (7.8 percentage points) and academic reputation (7.4 percentage points). The one area that was more important to students at their second or third choice is the opportunity to play sports by 5.2 percentage points. Career and private schools: First-year students, first choice vs. first-year students, second and third choice
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Personalized Recommend Geographic Campus Size of Future setting appearance attention prior from institution employment to enrollement family opportunities
TM 82.5% 78.5% 87.3% 83.1% 85.7% 79.9% 71.7% 65.8% 74.4% 70.2% 64.3% 67.7% 76.7% 71.1% 90.6% 87.1% 83.5% 78.7%

Career school first-year, firstchoice students Career school first-year, secondand third-choice students

At career and private schools, first-choice students all had higher importance scores than students who indicated that they were at their second- or third-choice institution. Geographic setting had the highest importance difference between the two groups with 6.7 percentage points.

8 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Fifteen-year trends on enrollment factors
In 2011, Noel-Levitz published a series of reports focusing on the importance and satisfaction trends on institutions over the past 15 years. These reports included a review on the shifts in enrollment factor perceptions over the course of that period. The relevant findings include: Four-year private institutions: Students in 2009-2010 indicated much higher importance scores on cost (6.8 percentage points), campus appearance (5.6 percentage points), and financial aid (5.1 percentage points) than students in 1994-1995. Four-year public institutions: All factors increased in importance between 1994-1995 and 2009-2010, with the biggest jumps coming for financial aid (15.1 percentage points), personalized attention prior to enrollment (10.9 percentage points), and recommendations from family and friends (10.3 percentage points). Community colleges: All of the factors increased in importance for students between 1994-1995 and 20092010, with financial aid reflecting the largest jump at 8.7 percentage points, followed by the opportunity to play sports (8.1 percentage points) and recommendations from family and friends (7.8 percentage points). Career and private schools: Several factors had double-digit increases in importance between 1996-1997 and 2010-2011: Recommendations from family and friends (16.0 percentage points), school appearance (15.7 percentage points), geographic setting (13.5 percentage points), and size of institution (12.2 percentage points). For more information on how the priorities of students have changed over time, please see the 15-year reports, available at: www.noellevitz.com/benchmark15years

How these findings impact your work in student recruitment and retention
What do these results signify for campus professionals? The results suggest three priority action items: 1. Prospective and current students want to know how much their education will cost. Your Web site and other campus communications should make this information accessible. If you are changing tuition, communicate this clearly to current students, as well as why tuition is changing and how students will benefit from the change. Be sure to make full use of federally mandated tuition calculators to provide complete, current information to prospective and current students on your Web site. 2. Make financial aid information easy to obtain. This goes beyond the first year of enrollment—students likely want to know how much financial assistance will be available during their entire campus careers. Information on other financial resources, such as scholarships, is also important. 3. Use your academic reputation to express the value of your educational offerings. Students need to know that an education from your institution is worth the investment. Making the strengths, features, benefits, and outcomes of your academic offerings clear will go a long way toward helping prospective students decide to enroll with you, as well as convincing current students to persist and graduate. Your faculty and staff should also express your institution’s academic excellence in their interactions with students. In addition, keep in mind that personalized attention prior to enrollment also plays an important role, especially at private institutions. Delivering personalized attention at every point of contact—in the mail, online, over the phone, and on campus—can make a big difference in persuading a student to enroll and to persist. It’s also an area where your campus has a unique opportunity to differentiate itself from other institutions. Location, size and setting, while not unimportant, do not rank nearly as high as these other factors. Tell students what it will cost, what financial assistance will be available, and the value of your educational offerings, and you address these top three elements that impact enrollment decisions.

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 9

Appendix I: List of institutions
Four-year private institutions Abilene Christian University, TX Azusa Pacific University, CA Bethel College, IN Bethel University, MN Bethune-Cookman University, FL Biola University, CA Bryan College, TN California Baptist University, CA Cedarville University, OH Coker College, SC Concordia University Texas, TX Corban University, OR Cornerstone University, MI Covenant College, GA Cox College, MO Crown College, MN Eastern University, PA Evangel University, MO Fresno Pacific University, CA Geneva College, PA Gordon College, MA Goshen College, IN Grace College and Seminary, IN Graceland University, IA Greenville College, IL Hope International University, CA Houston Baptist University, TX Huntington University, IN Indiana Wesleyan University, IN John Brown University, AR LeTourneau University, TX Lincoln College, IL Lipscomb University, TN Manhattan Christian College, KS McPherson College, KS Mid-America Christian University, OK Milligan College, TN Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design, WI Mississippi College, MS Montreat College, NC Northwest Christian University, OR Northwest Nazarene University, ID Northwest University, WA Northwestern College, MN Ohio Dominican University, OH Pacific Northwest College of Art, OR Palm Beach Atlantic University, FL Rockhurst University, MO Siena College, NY Simpson University, CA Southern Nazarene University, OK Southern Virginia University, VA Southwestern Adventist University, TX Spring Arbor University, MI St. Edward’s University, TX Tabor College, KS Taylor University, IN Trinity Christian College, IL University of Tampa, FL Valley Forge Christian College, PA Warner University, FL Waynesburg University, PA Williams Baptist College, AR Four-year public institutions Dakota State University, SD Mississippi State University, MS Montana Tech - North, MT Salem State University, MA South Carolina State University, SC South Dakota State University, SD University of MichiganDearborn, MI University of Minnesota Duluth, MN University of Nebraska, NE Community colleges Augusta Technical College, GA Bucks County Community College, PA Coffeyville Community College, KS Cypress College, CA Eastern Idaho Tech College, ID Fox Valley Technical College, WI Heartland Community College, IL Highland Community College, IL Kilian Community College, SD Lanier Technical College, GA Montana Tech - South, MT Piedmont Technical College, SC Spokane Falls Community College, WA Tri-County Technical College, SC Career and private schools Anthem Career CollegeMemphis, TN Anthem Career CollegeNashville, TN Anthem College-Atlanta, GA Anthem College-Dallas, TX Anthem College-Denver, CO Anthem College-Fenton, MO Anthem CollegeKansas City, MO Anthem College-Maryland Heights, MO Anthem College-Milwaukee, WI Anthem College-Minnesota, MN Anthem College-Orlando, FL Anthem College-Phoenix, AZ Anthem College-Portland, OR Anthem CollegeSacramento, CA Anthem InstituteCherry Hill, NJ Anthem InstituteJersey City, NJ Anthem Institute-Las Vegas, NV Anthem InstituteManhattan, NJ Anthem InstituteNorth Brunswick, NJ Anthem InstituteParsippany, NJ Anthem Institute-Springfield, PA The Bryman School of Arizona, AZ City College of Altamonte, FL City College of Ft. Lauderdale, FL City College of Gainesville, FL City College of Hollywood, CA City College of Miami, FL Laurel Business Institute, PA Morrison University, NV Pima Medical InstituteMesa, AZ Salter College, MA Taylor Business Institute, IL

Note: This list reflects only the institutions which administered the Student Satisfaction Inventory between September 1 and December 31, 2011.

10 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Appendix II: Demographics
Table 2: Class level by institution type Institution type
Four-year private colleges and universities Four-year public colleges and universities Community, junior, and technical colleges Two-year career and private schools Total

First-year student counts
8,023 2,709 5,600 5,519 21,851

Upperclass student counts
16,145 7,608 5,147 1,784 30,684
TM

Table 3: Institutional choice by institutional type (first-year students only) Institution type
Four-year private colleges and universities Four-year public colleges and universities Community, junior, and technical colleges Two-year career and private schools Total

First-year, first-choice student counts
5,166 1,652 3,588 3,495 13,901

First-year, second- and thirdchoice student counts
2,798 1,045 1,947 1,970 7,760
TM

Note: Overall student counts reflect all students in the data set, but not all students indicated a class level or an institutional choice.

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 11

Appendix III: Complete tables for each data set
Table 4: Comparison across institution type for first-year students only Four-year private first-year students
78.5% 83.9% 79.1% 62.9% 48.9% 57.7% 62.4% 68.1%

Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

Four-year public first-year students
80.5% 79.6% 74.9% 64.2% 49.7% 63.1% 63.4% 61.3%

Community college first-year students
83.0% 78.1% 71.2% 49.9% 45.3% 55.8% 53.6% 59.1%

Career school first-year students
81.0% 85.7% 83.5% 69.6% 68.0% 72.0% 74.6% 81.7%
TM

Table 5: Four-year private institutions: First-year students vs. upperclass students Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First-year students
78.5% 83.9% 79.1% 62.9% 33.7% 48.9% 57.7% 62.4% 68.1%

Upperclass students
76.2% 83.8% 77.8% 56.4% 29.0% 48.7% 51.6% 53.9% 62.7%
TM

Table 6: Four-year public Institutions: First-year students vs. upperclass students Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First-year students
80.5% 79.6% 74.9% 64.2% 33.2% 49.7% 63.1% 63.4% 61.3%

Upperclass students
79.2% 77.5% 75.2% 60.5% 23.0% 45.5% 66.2% 55.6% 56.3%
TM

12 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Table 7: Community colleges: First-year students vs. second- and third-year students Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First-year students
83.0% 78.1% 71.2% 49.9% 23.7% 45.3% 55.8% 53.6% 59.1%

Second- and third-year students
83.0% 76.3% 71.0% 49.3% 22.1% 44.8% 60.2% 53.6% 57.5%
TM

Table 8: Career and private schools: First-year students vs. second- and third-year students Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Future employment opportunities Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First-year students
81.0% 85.7% 83.5% 69.6% 89.2% 68.0% 72.0% 74.6% 81.7%

Second- and third-year students
76.5% 83.5% 80.7% 66.8% 86.1% 63.7% 69.8% 71.5% 77.7%
TM

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 13

Table 9: Four-year private institutions: First-year students, first-choice campus vs. first-year students, second- and third-choice campus Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First choice
77.4% 84.1% 81.4% 64.4% 30.6% 50.5% 57.5% 62.5% 70.1%

Second or third choice
80.6% 83.7% 74.5% 60.1% 39.4% 45.6% 57.9% 62.2% 64.3%
TM

Table 10: Four-year public institutions: First-year students, first-choice campus vs. first-year students, second- and third-choice campus Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First choice
78.3% 76.8% 75.5% 65.5% 29.6% 51.1% 67.5% 65.4% 61.4%

Second or third choice
83.8% 83.8% 73.7% 61.8% 38.7% 47.6% 56.2% 60.3% 61.1%
TM

14 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

Table 11: Community colleges: First-year students, first-choice campus vs. first-year students, second- and third-choice campus Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Opportunity to play sports Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First choice
83.0% 79.4% 73.7% 51.3% 21.9% 48.4% 58.5% 55.0% 61.0%

Second or third choice
82.9% 75.7% 66.3% 47.0% 27.1% 39.2% 50.7% 50.8% 55.3%
TM

Table 12: Career and private schools: First-year students, first-choice campus vs. first-year students, second- and third-choice campus Enrollment factors
Cost Financial aid Academic reputation Size of institution Future employment opportunities Recommendations from family Geographic setting Campus appearance Personalized attention prior to enrollment

First choice
82.5% 87.3% 85.7% 71.7% 90.6% 70.2% 74.4% 76.7% 83.5%

Second or third choice
78.5% 83.1% 79.9% 65.8% 87.1% 64.3% 67.7% 71.1% 78.7%
TM

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • www.noellevitz.com 15

Questions about this report?
We hope you found this report to be helpful and informative. If you have questions or would like more information about these findings, please contact Noel-Levitz at 1-800-876-1117 or e-mail ContactUs@noellevitz.com.

About Noel-Levitz
A trusted partner to higher education, Noel-Levitz helps systems and campuses reach and exceed their goals for enrollment, marketing, and student success. Over the past three decades, the higher education professionals at Noel-Levitz have consulted directly with more than 2,700 colleges and universities nationwide in the areas of: • Student retention • Staff and advisor development • Student success • Marketing and recruitment • Financial aid services • Research and communications • Institutional effectiveness Noel-Levitz has developed an array of proven tools and software programs; diagnostic tools and instruments; Web-based training programs; and customized consultations, workshops, and national conferences. With the Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys, including the Student Satisfaction Inventory, the firm brings together its many years of research and campus-based experience to enable you to get to the heart of your campus agenda.

How to cite this report Noel-Levitz (2012). Why did they enroll? The factors influencing college choice. Coralville, Iowa: Author. Retrieved from www.noellevitz.com/Factors2012.

Except where cited otherwise, all material in this paper is copyright © by Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to redistribute information from Noel-Levitz, Inc., either in print or electronically. Please contact us at ContactUs@ noellevitz.com about reusing material from this report.

P009 0812

16 © 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc. • 2012 National Research Report: Why Did They Enroll? The Factors Influencing College Choice

1-800-876-1117 | ContactUs@noellevitz.com | www.noellevitz.com

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Perceived Value for International Students

...Edited the topic student wanted I come up with an appropriate topic PERCEVED VALUE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: CASE STUDY, APPROACH OF PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUITION. Name: Institution: Remember questionnaire I did re write it whole Abstract The international students’ enrolment in Malaysian private higher education institutions acts as a major contributor to the national economic ability of the higher education institutions. Consequently, this has led to the rise of several studies concerning international students on many aspects, including their perceptions, living experiences, and their behaviors towards the renowned values of the choice of their private higher education institution in Malaysia. In this context, there are very few studies that have looked into international students’ overall satisfaction with their experiences in private higher education institutions. This study is committed to investigate the factors affecting decision making of international students in choosing Malaysian private higher education institutions as a study destination for their postgraduate studies. Sampling chosen for this research are international students currently studying at XX College, one of the leading private higher education institutions in Malaysia. This study contains a theoretical framework...

Words: 16228 - Pages: 65

Premium Essay

``Push-Pull'' Factors Influencing International Student Destination Choice

...``Push-pull'' factors influencing international student destination choice Tim Mazzarol Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia Geoffrey N. Soutar Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia Keywords Students, Decision making, Learning, Country of origin Introduction Why do students choose to study overseas? Demand for education, particularly higher education, has traditionally been driven by expectations of its ability to raise the economic and social status of the graduate. For people in less developed countries, limited access to education in their own countries led to a significant rise in the number of international students studying overseas. Between 1960 and 1970, the average growth in international student flows was around 9 per cent, and continued at about 6 per cent from 1970 to 1980 (Hughes, 1988). While there is some evidence of a slowing in the overall flow of international students during the 1980s and 1990s (Kemp, 1995), a global industry has been created. The global pattern of international student flows may be explained by a combination of ``push and pull'' factors that encourage students to study overseas. ``Push'' factors operate within the source country and initiate a student's decision to undertake international study. ``Pull'' factors operate within a host country to make that country relatively attractive to international students. Some of these factors are inherent...

Words: 6132 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Sustainable Competitive Advantage for Market Leadership Amongst the Private Higher Education Institutes in Malaysia

...ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH (2 ICBER 2011) PROCEEDING nd nd SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR MARKET LEADERSHIP AMONGST THE PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTES IN MALAYSIA Loh Teck Hua KDU University College Business School Section 13 Campus, 76, Jalan Universiti, 46200, Petaling Jaya, Selangor DE ABSTRACT One of Malaysia’s economic goals is to become an education hub for the region. To achieve this, the Malaysian government had liberalised government policies resulting in the proliferation of Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) including private Universities and University Colleges. As competition intensifies it becomes increasingly pertinent to ask “What sustainable competitive advantage should the Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) have to achieve market leadership in the Malaysian education industry?” For the smaller PHEIs, it is a question of survival itself. This paper aims to provide a theoretical study of some of the key strategic activities of the leading PHEIs to answer this question. The literature review covering both foreign and local sources indicates three key factors of sustainable competitive advantage, i.e. branding and image, the physical aspects of higher education including location and facilities, and the mode of delivery. The paper will seek to identify these factors amongst the market leaders to ascertain the validity of the secondary data via critical analysis of their activities. The theoretical framework employed...

Words: 11731 - Pages: 47

Premium Essay

Student

...INTRODUCTION. 1. Background information to the research problem. The prevalence of drop out varies between and within countries and occurs more frequently in certain age ranges and grades depending on the educational structure and patterns of participation in that country (Hunt, 2008). However, Teenagers’ dropping out of high school before completion has been a challenge for educators, parents, and employers for at least 30 years [Blue & Cook (2004); citing Haycock & Huang]. For many public school students’ particularly male students from low-income or ethnic minority families graduating from high school has remained problematic, even as the nation’s general educational level has increased [Blue & Cook (2004); citing Dillow]. According to 2000 current population survey (CPS) of the U.S. census bureau are used to compute dropout and completion rates by background characteristics, such as sex, race/ethnicity, and family income. Dropout rates in U.S are typical calculated in one of two ways: status rates and events rates. Status dropout rates indicate the number and percentage of people aged 15–24 who are not enrolled in school and have not obtained a high school credential. Event dropout rates, on the other hand, measure the number and percentage of students leaving school over a particular time period typically one year. Dropping out of school seems to be the result of a long-term process of disengaging from school [Blue & Cook (2004); citing Alexander &...

Words: 9182 - Pages: 37

Free Essay

Students Accommodation

...MacroPlan Australia Setting New Standards MacroPlan Australia Setting New Standards Student Accommodation Study October 2006 PREPARED FOR CITY OF WHITEHORSE City of Whitehorse MACROPLAN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD SYDNEY |MELBOURNE Page 1 of 60 MacroPlan Australia Setting New Standards + Contact Information PROJECT DIRECTOR Con Tsotsoros (Director, Spatial Planning) MELBOURNE SYDNEY Fairfax House Level 5, 19-31 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW. 2000 t. 02 9252 1199 f. 02 9241 6002 REPORT CONTACT Jason Black (Associate Director, Spatial Planning) MELBOURNE MELBOURNE Level 4, 107-109 Flinders Lane, Melbourne, Vic. 3000 t. 03 9663 6826 f. 03 9663 2896 e. info@macroplan.com.au w. www.macroplan.com.au Signed+ …………………………………….……. Dated: 26 October 2006 + This document has been reviewed by the Director of the Spatial Planning Group, MacroPlan Australia. This document is for discussion purposes only unless signed and dated by the person(s) identified. Disclaimer © MacroPlan Australia Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language in any form by any means without the written permission of MacroPlan Australia Pty Ltd. Intellectual Property Rights All Rights Reserved. All methods, processes, commercial proposals and other contents described in this document are the confidential intellectual property of MacroPlan Australia Pty Ltd and may not be used or...

Words: 31920 - Pages: 128

Premium Essay

Mister

...contemporary society than Biology has”. Man, probably was a biologist before he was anything else, his own health body in health and illness, the phenomena of birth, growth, and death of the plants and other animals that give him food, shelter and clothing undoubtedly were matters of serious concern to man then and even now. Biology is intimately connected to daily life and everybody’s life-long planning. Shut out Biology from daily life and civilization comes to a standstill. It is in the light of this, that the research seeks to build and elicit among students and teachers the proper appreciation and interest in the value of Biology to the individual and to the society at large. This subject Biology, occupies a very important position in senior secondary school level curriculum. Introducing Biology at that level meaning laying a strong foundation in Biology and help equip people in future in Biology related careers. Students enrolment in Biology are more than in Chemistry and Physics. It is for this reason that Biology should be well taught in senior secondary school. Biology has the highest number of candidates...

Words: 5188 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Factors Influencing Students Academic Performance in Biology

...FACTORS INFLUENCING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN BIOLOGY IN ILORIN WEST LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF KWARA STATE, NIGERIA. BY OLAWUNMI, Kareemat Ariyo 08/25PA026 A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE EDUCATION; FACULTY OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF ILORIN, NIGERIA IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION (B.SC.ED.) IN BIOLOGY MAY, 2012 CERTIFICATION This is to certify that this research project was carried out by OLAWUNMI, Kareemat Ariyo with Matriculation Number 08/25PA026 and it has been read, certified and approved as meeting the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Science Education Degree (B.Sc. Ed. Biology) under the Department of Science Education, faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin Kwara State Nigeria. Dr. S. O. Oyelekan Date Supervisor Esther O. Omoshewo PhD Date Head of Department Prof. A. S. Olorundare Date Dean, Faculty of Education External Supervisor Date DEDICATION The entire work of this project is dedicated to Almighty Allah, the Bestower of knowledge and Wisdom, to whom everything shall returns. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am highly indebted to Almighty Allah, Who alone had favored me beyond my imaginations. ABSTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Certification Dedication Acknowledgement Abstract Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Background of the problem Statement of the problem Purpose of the...

Words: 7009 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Counselling for Career Choices

...UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION FACTORS INFLUENCING CAREER CHOICE AMONG THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SOUTH TONGU DISTRICT OF VOLTA REGION, GHANA DANIEL KWASI GAMELI AVUGLA JULY, 2011 UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION FACTORS INFLUENCING CAREER CHOICE AMONG THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SOUTH TONGU DISTRICT OF VOLTA REGION, GHANA DANIEL KWASI GAMELI AVUGLA (B.ED BUSINESS EDUCATION, ACCOUNTING OPTION) A Thesis in the Department of Psychology and Education, Faculty of EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, University of Education, Winneba, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for award of the Master of Philosophy (M. Phil Guidance & Counselling) degree JULY, 2011 DECLARATION STUDENT’S DECLARATION I, DANIEL KWASI GAMELI AVUGLA declare that this Thesis, with the exception of quotations and references contained in published works which have all being identified and duly acknowledged, is entirely my own original work, and it has not been submitted, either in part or whole for another degree elsewhere SIGNATURE: ............................................................................. DATE: ......................................................................................... SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that the preparation and presentation of this work...

Words: 27516 - Pages: 111

Premium Essay

The Impact of Application of Information and Communications Technology (Ict) in the Administration of Polytechnics in Ogun State, Nigeria

...Abeokuta for the award of Masters Degree in Education. _____________________ _____________________ DR. FOLAJIN, S.O. SIGNATURE / DATE PROJECT SUPERVISOR ________________________ _____________________ PROGRAMME LEADER SIGNATURE / DATE _____________________________ _____________________ PROF. BADMUS ADEMOLA SIGNATURE / DATE DEAN SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ________________________ _____________________ EXTERNAL EXAMINER SIGNATURE / DATE DEDICATION This research project is dedicated to the Holy Spirit, who has been the source of my inspiration. Also to my dependable wife, Mrs. Endurance Amishetu Adesayo Soneye and to my beloved children, Adebayo Soneye (Jnr.), Adedayo Soneye and Adetayo Soneye. To number one student of National open University of Nigeria Chief Aremu Okikiola Olusegun Obasanjo (Former President Federal Republic of Nigeria). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My profound gratitude goes to the Almighty God for His continual guidance, shelter, provisions and support. I also wish to express my indebtedness to my loving and caring mother Mrs. Grace Abiola Soneye for her motherly advice and encouragement. I really appreciate your spiritual...

Words: 10801 - Pages: 44

Free Essay

“the Effect of Study Habits of Selected Marine Student to Their Academic Performance”

...SELECTED MARINE STUDENT TO THEIR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE” A Research Paper Presented to the College of Arts Department In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course English Presented To Sir. Joel E. Payapa, Ed.D Presented By Cercado, Joshua Kim T. Daniel, John Daniel M. De Guzman, John Odilon T. March 15, 2013 Chapter 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND Introduction The extent of student’s learning in academics may be determined by the grades a student earns for a period of learning has been done. It is believed that a grade is a primary indicator of such learning. If a learner earns high grades it is concluded that they may also have learned a lot while low grades indicate lesser learning. However, many experiences and studies found out that there are also several factors that would account for the grades. No single factor can be definitely pointed out as predicting grades. It has been an inter play of so many factors – gender, IQ, study habits, age, year level, parent’s educational attainment, social status, number of siblings, birth order, etc. In fact, almost all of existing environmental and personal factors are a variable of academic performance. However, at this point in time, there searchers would like to investigate the possible relationship of study habits and the factors affecting it to the academic achievement of under graduate education student of Technological...

Words: 7761 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Undergraduates' Perceptions of Tourism and Hospitality as a Career Choice

...undergraduate tourism and hospitality student’s views of the industry as a career choice. Three hundred and seventy-nine tourism and hospitality students, from eight Australian institutions, completed a questionnaire rating the importance of twenty factors in influencing their choice of career, and then the extent to which they thought tourism and hospitality, as a career, offers these factors. A number of factors have been identified as being significantly different. From the results it is clear that students generally do not believe that a career in tourism and hospitality will offer them the factors that they find important. Key Words: Career choice, Undergraduates, Perceptions, Tourism, Hospitality INTRODUCTION The tourism and hospitality industry worldwide, and in Australia in particular, has been confronted with the problem of attracting and retaining quality employees which has lead to a shortage of skilled personnel to staff the ever-growing number of tourism and hospitality businesses (Andorka, 1996; Bonn & Forbringer, 1992; Breiter, 1991; Deery & Shaw, 1999; Dermady & Holloway, 1998; Emenheiser, Clay, & Palakurthi, 1998; Ferris, Berkson, & Harris, 2002; Freeland, 2000; Heraty & Morley, 1998; Hinkin & Tracey, 2000; McDermid, 1996; Powell, 1999; Tourism Division, 2002). This problem is complex with many different contributing factors. A number of characteristics commonly found in the tourism and hospitality industry result in the skills shortage currently facing the industry...

Words: 6459 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

The Effects of Study Habit on the Academic Performance

...FACTORS AFFECTING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY BY KYOSHABA MARTHA BBA (UCU) 2005/HD04/4262U DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FUFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY DECEMBER 2009 DECLARATION I, Martha Kyoshaba, hereby declare that, this dissertation is my original work and has never been presented to any university or institution for any academic award. Sign:………………………………………………………….. Martha Kyoshaba Date:………………………………………………………….. 1 APPROVAL This dissertation has been written under our supervision and has been submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Educational Management with our approval as supervisors. ………………………………………………………………. Dr. James L. Nkata Date:………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………. Dr. F. E. K. Bakkabulindi Date:………………………………………………………… 2 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my late mother, Mrs. Petrid K Majara who always wanted me to be a teacher, my husband Jacobs who encouraged me to strive on and my little girls, Isabel and Christabel whom I want to follow in my footsteps. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank the following people who in many ways contributed to this piece of work. I am indebted to my supervisor, Dr. James L. Nkata for his patience, inspiration and encouragement. I admired the way in which...

Words: 17394 - Pages: 70

Premium Essay

Advrtising

...IN GHANA By Beatrix Allah Mensah AUTHOR: Beatrix Allah-Mensah Department of Political Science University of Ghana, Legon ISBN: 9988-572-87-5 © Copyright Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation, Accra Published in 2005 Printed & designed by O´Mens Graphix, Accra, Tel.:021-238098 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to acknowledge the contribution of all those who made this project a success. First, I give glory to the Almighty God for bringing me this far in my academic and professional pursuit. Secondly, I express my thanks to all my lecturers in the Department of Political Science, University of Ghana, who have nurtured me onto this path of professional and academic life. Thirdly, I am grateful to all our key informant interviewees from all the institutions/ministries/political parties who gave us their time and valuable information used for this study. Fourthly, I wish to sincerely acknowledge the contribution of my research assistants, Alfred Appiah and Nimingah Beka, national service personnel of the Department of Political Science for their dedicated service during the data collection. Finally, I would like to express my thanks to the Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES) for commissioning this study and giving me the opportunity to carry it out with financial and institutional support. I would like to state that, except for quotations or references which have been dully acknowledged, this is the result of a research I conducted personally. God Bless all who contributed to this effort. ...

Words: 36172 - Pages: 145

Premium Essay

Online Learning

...Online Learning for Educational Productivity U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology Prepared by: Marianne Bakia Linda Shear Yukie Toyama Austin Lasseter Center for Technology in Learning SRI International January 2012 This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education under Contract number ED01-CO-0040 Task 0010 with SRI International. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred. U.S. Department of Education Arne Duncan Secretary Office of Educational Technology Karen Cator Director January 2012 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce this report in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the suggested citation is: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity, Washington, D.C., 2012. This report is available on the Department’s Web site at http://www.ed.gov/technology On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print, or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at (202) 260-0852 or (202) 260-0818. Technical Contact: Bernadette Adams Senior Policy Analyst Office of Educational Technology bernadette...

Words: 22355 - Pages: 90

Premium Essay

Academic

...ACADEMIC GUIDELINES www.ibs.utm.my ACADEMIC GUIDELINES CONTENTS ITEM PAGE Overview / Background of UTM 4 Philosophy of UTM 4 Vision of UTM 4 Mission of UTM 4 Motto of UTM 4 International Business School (IBS) In Brief 5 Vision of UTM IBS 5 Mission of UTM IBS 5 Core Values 5 Client Charter 6 UTM IBS Organization Chart 7 Postgraduate Administrator 8 Graduate Faculty 9 Enrolment and Duration Of Studies 13 Change of Program Of Study, Type of Registration, And Mode of Study 13 Withdrawal (TD) of a Course 14 Attendance 14 Academic Load 14 Credit Exemption and Transfer 15 Grading System 16 Academic Standing 17 Deferment, Suspension and Termination 18 2 ACADEMIC GUIDELINES ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES  MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) 20 21  Introduction  MBA Course Structure  Programme Specifications and Learning Outcomes 23  Course Synopsis 26 21  DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (DBA)  Programme Specifications and Learning Outcomes  DBA Course Structure 38 41 OTHER INFORMATION  REFERENCES UTM IBS Postgraduate Student Society (PGSS) 42 43 3 ACADEMIC GUIDELINES OVERVIEW / BACKGROUND OF UTM The main campus of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) is located in a strategic area of 1,177 hectares in the Iskandar Development Region, Johor.UTM has another campus known as the UTM Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Semarak with an area of 18 hectares. The history of UTM began in 1904 as a Treacher Techical School and was later...

Words: 8304 - Pages: 34