Free Essay

Ethical Capitalism

In:

Submitted By brendancph
Words 2886
Pages 12
GOOD EVENING
I’M HERE TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT CAPITALISM.
I’M HERE BECAUSE A FEW WEEKS AGO I SAT ON A PANEL AT CBS ASSESSING STUDENTS WHO HAD APPLIED FOR OVERSEAS INTERNSHIPS
I EXPECTED TO MEET DENMARK’S NEXT GENERATION OF BUSINESS LEADERS
INSTEAD I MET DENMARK’S NEXT GENERATION OF NGO OFFICERS, CHARITY WORKERS AND UNITED NATIONS BUREAUCRATS.
ONE STUDENT AFTER ANOTHER TOLD ME HOW THEY HAD NO INTEREST IN A CAREER IN BUSINESS.
HOW BUSINESS PEOPLE ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN MONEY.
IT WAS AS IF CAPITALISM WAS SYNONYMOUS WITH EXPLOITING THE POOR, PUTTING CHILDREN TO WORK IN FACTORIES, DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT.
IT WAS AS IF YOUR SCHOOL HAD BEEN POISONED, THAT A COLLECTIVE GROUPTHINK HAD TAKEN HOLD AND IT HAD BECOME IMPOSSIBLE TO STAND UP FOR THE MARKET ECONOMY WITHOUT LOSING ALL YOUR FRIENDS.
THAT’S WHY I’M HERE. I ASKED TO BE HERE.
TO STAND UP FOR THE MARKET ECONOMY. FOR CAPITALISM.
AND FOR LIBERTY – WHICH IS WHAT MAKES IT ALL TICK.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN THE MARKET ECONOMY IS MANKIND’S GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT
DARWIN’S THEORY OF EVOLUTION WAS GOOD.
EINSTEIN’S THEORY OF RELATIVITY WAS QUITE IMPRESSIVE.
THE LUNAR LANDINGS DESERVE A MENTION.
BUT CAPITALISM IS A MIRACLE.
WE HAVE INVENTED A MAGICAL SYSTEM THAT ALL BY ITSELF GENERATES PROSPERITY AND MAKES EVERYBODY RICHER.
CAPITALISM IS A FORCE FOR GOOD NOT BECAUSE IT MAKES THE RICH RICHER – ALTHOUGH IT DOES - BUT BECAUSE IT LIFTS THE POOR OUT OF POVERTY.
THE BIG WINNERS FROM CAPITALISM – THE JACKPOT LOTTERY WINNERS – ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT RICH
THE MARGINAL VALUE OF AN EXTRA MILLION DOLLARS TO A RICH PERSON IS ALMOST ZERO.
IF MARK ZUCKERBERG WERE GIVEN A BILLION DOLLARS TOMORROW IT WOULD NOT CHANGE HIS LIFE IN ANY WAY.
BUT A GOOD JOB, DECENT HOUSING, GOOD HEALTHCARE AND FREE EDUCATION ARE ABSOLUTELY TRANSFORMATIONAL FOR THE POOR.
WHAT THE MARKET ECONOMY HAS DONE FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT RICH IN THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS IS ALMOST UNBELIEVABLE.
ON JUST ABOUT EVERY MEASURE – EDUCATION, LIFE EXPECTANCY, HEALTH CARE, DIET, RECREATION, HOUSING – ORDINARY PEOPLE IN EUROPE HAVE BENEFITTED HUGELY FROM THE PROSPERITY CREATED BY THE MARKET ECONOMY.
AND YET THE MARKET ECONOMY IS UNDER ASSAULT.
OUR STREETS ARE FILLED WITH PROTESTERS – ANTI-CAPITALIST, ANTI-AUSTERITY, ANTI-BANKING, ANTI GLOBALISATION –
IT MIGHT SURPRISE YOU TO HEAR: I AGREE WITH THEM.
THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN.
BUT I HAVE TO DISAGREE WITH THEIR ANALYSIS OF WHY IT’S ROTTEN.
CAPITALISTS ARE NOT EVIL. FAR FROM IT.
IN MY CAREER I HAVE BEEN LUCKY ENOUGH TO SERVE AS THE PRESIDENT OF COCA-COLA’S AFRICA DIVISION.
I RAN A VERY LARGE BUSINESS, WITH OVER 75 MANUFACTURING PLANTS IN 39 COUNTRIES IN SUB SAHARAN AFRICA.
MY FRIENDS, WHEN YOU FIND YOURSELF IN SUCH A POSITION YOU HAVE THE POWER TO CHANGE LIVES
YOU HAVE LEVERS AT YOUR DISPOSAL THAT THE PLACARD WAVERS IN THEIR TENTS IN THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT WILL NEVER HAVE – AND YOU CAN USE THAT POWER TO MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE.
SO ASK YOURSELF THIS:
IF YOU FOUND YOURSELF RUNNING A BILLION DOLLAR DIVISION OF A MULTINATIONAL SOMEWHERE IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD – INDONESIA, VIETNAM, BOLIVIA, WHEREVER – WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
WOULD YOU PUT CHILDREN TO WORK IN YOUR FACTORIES?
WOULD YOU PUMP RAW SEWAGE INTO THE LOCAL RIVERS?
WOULD YOU EXPLOIT THE POOR?
OF COURSE NOT.
AND NOR DID I.
WHAT I DID DO WAS USE MY POSITION TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE IN THE AFRICAN CONTINENT.
IF YOU DON’T AGREE WITH THE WAY BUSINESSES CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD THEN DON’T JUST MOAN ABOUT IT IN THE STUDENT UNION BAR, TAKE THEM OVER AND RUN THEM YOURSELF.
DON’T SIT THERE BLOGGING ANGRILY – GET YOURSELF INTO A POSITION OF POWER AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
THE WORLD OF BUSINESS GETS BETTER EVERY YEAR BECAUSE OF A BLOOD TRANSFUSION OF YOUNG MANAGERS WHO HAVE SOCIAL VALUES THAT DIDN’T EXIST EVEN 30 YEARS AGO.
WE ARE NOT LIVING IN THE 19TH CENTURY ANYMORE. WE LIVE IN AN AGE OF ENLIGHTENED CAPITALISM .
THE PLACARD WAVERS ARE WRONG BECAUSE THEY HAVE MISSED THE POINT.
THE SYSTEM ISN’T ROTTEN BECAUSE OF BANKERS BONUSES, IT’S ROTTEN BECAUSE OF THE ASSAULT ON LIBERTY AND THE ASSAULT ON THE MARKET ECONOMY, WHICH IS PUTTING OUR PROSPERITY AT RISK.
HALF A CENTURY AGO, THE GREAT AMERICAN PHILOSOPHER AYN RAND WROTE A BOOK CALLED ‘ATLAS SHRUGGED’.
IT’S A NOVEL SET IN A WORLD WHERE THE GOVERNMENT SETS UP WHAT IT CALLS A NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC PLANNING TO DIRECT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY RATHER THAN LEAVE IT TO THE MARKET.
IT SENDS OUT INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL THE COMPANIES TELLING THEM WHAT TO PRODUCE, WHEN AND AT WHAT PRICE.
AND WHEN THINGS GO FROM BAD TO WORSE IT SENDS OUT NEW ORDERS TO WORKERS AND CONSUMERS TELLING THEM WHAT TO BUY, WHAT TO EAT, WHAT TO WEAR AND SO ON – ALL IN THE GREATER NATIONAL INTEREST OF COURSE.
THE IDEA IS THAT GOVERNMENTS CAN PULL ALL THE LEVERS AND CONTROL EVENTS, STEERING THE ECONOMY BACK ON COURSE.
IT ALL ENDS IN TEARS OF COURSE, AS IT ALWAYS DOES IN THE REAL WORLD.
EVEN AYN RAND DIDN’T REALLY EXPECT THAT HER NIGHTMARE WOULD COME TRUE, BUT SADLY IT HAS.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, NOVEMBER 19TH 2008 WAS A BLACK DAY IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THAT BEACON OF THE FREE MARKET.
MARK IT IN YOUR CALENDAR AND CIRCLE IT IN BLACK.
ON THAT DAY, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVES OF THE THREE BIG AMERICAN CAR MAKERS – GENERAL MOTORS, FORD AND CHRYSLER – TURNED UP AT A CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ON CAPITOL HILL WITH THEIR BEGGING BOWLS TO ASK CONGRESS FOR MONEY.
THEY PLEADED WITH CONGRESS TO GIVE THEM TAXPAYERS’ MONEY AND TOLD THE SENATORS THAT IF THEY DIDN’T GET IT THEIR BUSINESSES WOULD GO BUST.
WANT TO KNOW HOW MUCH THEY ASKED FOR?
FIFTY THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS.
LET’S LEAVE ASIDE FOR A MOMENT THE FACT THAT THESE THREE GENTLEMEN SHOULD NOT EVEN BE ALLOWED IN THE SAME ROOM AS EACH OTHER – THEY ARE COMPETITORS! – BUT LET’S ASK INSTEAD WHY THEY NEEDED THE MONEY.
THEY NEEDED IT BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN WIPED OUT BY CONSUMERS WHO HAD STOPPED BUYING THEIR BIG, GAS-GUZZLING EXPENSIVE AND UNRELIABLE CARS AND INSTEAD HAD STARTED BUYING CHEAPER, BETTER, MORE TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED TOYOTAS, HONDAS, NISSANS AND BMWS – ALL OF WHICH, INCIDENTALLY, ARE NOW MANUFACTURED IN THE US BY US WORKERS.
IN FACT, IN THE TEN YEARS LEADING UP TO THAT MEETING, THE MARKET SHARE OF THE BIG THREE IN THE US HAD FALLEN FROM 70% TO 50%.
THAT’S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU RUN YOUR BUSINESS BADLY – CONSUMERS SWITCH TO SOMETHING BETTER. IT’S THE MARKET AT WORK.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE DAY THESE THREE CHIEF EXECUTIVES ON THEIR MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR SALARIES, BONUSES AND STOCK OPTIONS, PITCHED UP ON CAPITOL HILL TO BEG FOR A TAXPAYER FUNDED RESCUE OF THE COMPANIES THEY HAD LED OVER A CLIFF STANDS AS ONE OF THE MOST SHAMEFUL IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
BECAUSE INSTEAD OF KICKING THEM OUT AND SENDING THEM AWAY WITH THEIR TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS CONGRESS VOTED THEM THE MONEY.
A $17BN RESCUE PACKAGE WAS SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT BUSH LATER THAT YEAR.
TODAY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OWNS 32% OF GENERAL MOTORS.
THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC PLANNING IS ALIVE AND WELL IN AMERICA.
WHO COULD EVER HAVE BELIEVED IT?
SO WHAT SHOULD CONGRESS HAVE DONE?
LET THEM GO BUST, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN
LET. THEM. GO. BUST.
BANKRUPTCY OF BADLY MANAGED COMPANIES IS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE MARKET ECONOMY AND IT’S ALSO THE MOST POORLY UNDERSTOOD.
IF GENERAL MOTORS HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO GO BANKRUPT IT WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED THE NUMBER OF CARS AMERICANS WANT TO BUY EACH YEAR.
THAT MEANS ALL OF GM’S MARKET SHARE WOULD BE UP FOR GRABS AND THE REMAINING COMPANIES WOULD HAVE TO EXPAND PRODUCTION HUGELY TO MEET DEMAND.
UNDOUBTEDLY HONDA AND TOYOTA WOULD HAVE BOUGHT SOME OF GM’S FACTORIES, FIXED THEM UP TO RUN MORE EFFICIENTLY AND FILLED THE GAP THAT WAY.
UNDOUBTEDLY MANY OF GM’S BEST PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN RE-HIRED BY NISSAN AND BMW.
UNDOUBTEDLY SOME OF THEIR BETTER CAR BRANDS WOULD HAVE BEEN BOUGHT TOO.
AND WHAT WOULD EMERGE AT THE END OF THAT IS A FITTER, LEANER AND MORE PRODUCTIVE CAR INDUSTRY IN THE US.
AND THAT IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN ANYWAY.
IN THE LONG TERM, GOVERNMENTS CANNOT PROTECT COMPANIES FROM THIER OWN INCOMPETENCE. CONSUMERS WILL MAKE THE DECISION.
THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS IS LITTERED WITH FAILURE.
THESE CAR MAKERS WILL STILL GO BUST EVENTUALLY – BUT NOW THE GOVERNMENT HAS ENSURED THAT WHEN THEY DO GROTESQUE AMOUNTS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY – MONEY TAKEN FROM ORDINARY FAMILIES ON MODEST INCOMES - WILL BE LOST TOO.
MEANWHILE OTHER BUSINESSES ARE ALLOWED TO FAIL.
IN THE US ALONE THOUSANDS OF BUSINESSES FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY IN 2008, SOME OF THEM LARGE EMPLOYERS, YET CONGRESS DIDN’T FIREHOSE TAXPAYERS’ MONEY AT THEM.
IT SHOULD ALREADY HAVE OCCURRED TO YOU THAT THERE IS SOMETHING VERY WRONG ABOUT A SYSTEM WHERE ELECTED POLITICIANS SIT IN JUDGEMENT OVER WHICH COMPANIES WILL BE SAVED AND WHICH WILL BE ALLOWED TO FAIL.
ARE YOU GOING TO ALLOW THE SAME KIND OF ASSAULT ON THE MARKET HERE IN DENMARK?
I HOPE MRS THORNING-SCHMIDT HAS MORE SENSE.
DENMARK TODAY HAS ONE OF THE STRONGEST ECONOMIES IN THE WORLD.
TO SAY THAT YOU PUNCH ABOVE YOUR WEIGHT IN THE WORLD IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT.
DENMARK HAS FIVE MILLION PEOPLE. JUST LIKE SCOTLAND. JUST LIKE THE ISLAND OF SICILY.
SCOTLAND? IT’S KEPT AFLOAT BY HUGE WEALTH TRANSFERS FROM ENGLAND, SOME 30 BN EUROS A YEAR.
YOU’VE ALL SEEN THE FILM ‘BRAVEHEART’. THE SEQUEL COULD BE CALLED ‘BEGGARHEART’
SICILY? HOW MANY WORLD-BEATING SICILIAN COMPANIES CAN YOU NAME?
BUT DENMARK IS A WORLD BEATING ECONOMY.
I HAVE BEEN LIVING AND WORKING IN DENMARK FOR A YEAR NOW AND I HAVE TO SAY YOU HAVE A FANTASTIC COUNTRY. I LOVE IT HERE.
THAT’S THE GOOD NEWS.
THE BAD NEWS IS THAT YOU’RE GOING TO LOSE IT – ALL OF IT – IF YOU TAKE IT FOR GRANTED.
YOUR PROSPERITY ISN’T GRANTED TO YOU BY GOD – IT’S THE LEGACY OF YOUR FATHERS AND GRANDFATHERS WHO WORKED HARD TO CREATE IT.
YOU NOW HAVE TO STEP INTO THEIR SHOES.
IF YOU DON’T, YOU WILL SQUANDER THAT LEGACY AND I PROMISE YOU YOUR CHILDREN WILL GROW UP POORER THAN YOU.
IF YOU THINK IT CAN’T HAPPEN, I’D LIKE TO INVITE YOU TO STARE DOWN THE BARREL OF A GUN WITH ME AND TAKE A LOOK AT HOW BAD IT COULD GET.
I WANT TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT MY COUNTRY, THE UK.
IN 1997 – JUST FIFTEEN YEARS AGO –WE HAD THE STRONGEST ECONOMY IN THE WESTERN WORLD. WE WERE FLYING – WE HOOVERED UP A GIGANTIC PROPORTION OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INTO THE WHOLE OF EUROPE. BRITAIN WAS THE PLACE WHERE EVERYONE WANTED TO DO BUSINESS.
ROLL THE MOVIE FORWARD TO TODAY AND WE ARE NOW THE MOST INDEBTED NATION IN THE WORLD- BY SOME DISTANCE.
THE UK IS IN FACT INSOLVENT ON ANY DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
OUR NATIONAL DEBT WAS 40% OF GDP 15 YEARS AGO. NOW IT’S APPROACHING 100% OF OUR GDP.
YOURS IN DENMARK IS ABOUT 40% TODAY. WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO BE IN 15 YEARS TIME?
THE UK GOVERNMENT’S DEFICIT - THE RATE AT WHICH IT ADDS TO THAT DEBT PILE EVERY YEAR – IS WORSE THAN THAT OF GREECE OR SPAIN.
THE UGLY TRUTH IS THAT THE UK HAS ALREADY RUN OUT OF MONEY.
THE GOVERNMENT IS BORROWING 350M POUNDS A DAY TO FUND THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT IT SPENDS AND WHAT IT RAISES IN TAXES.
EVERY THREE DAYS IT ADDS ANOTHER BILLION POUNDS TO THE DEBT PILE.
THERE IS OBVIOUSLY NOBODY WILLING TO LEND MONEY TO A GOVERNMENT THAT IS SPENDING LIKE A DRUNKEN SAILOR SO TO PAY THE WAGES OF OUR NURSES AND TEACHERS THE GOVERNMENT HAS RESORTED TO PRINTING MONEY.
THE UK TREASURY ISSUES BONDS ON A FRIDAY AND YOU CAN SELL THEM BACK TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND ON MONDAY IN EXCHANGE FOR NEWLY CREATED POUNDS. THEY’VE PRINTED 325 BN POUNDS IN TWO YEARS AND THERE’S NO SIGN OF IT ENDING ANY TIME SOON.
WE ARE PRINTING MONEY, DEBAUCHING THE CURRENCY AND TRYING NOT TO READ BOOKS ABOUT THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC, WHERE WHEELBARROWS FULL OF BANKNOTES WERE REQUIRED TO BUY A LOAF OF BREAD.
HOW DID THIS HAPPEN IN JUST 15 YEARS?
WELL THE POPULAR MYTH IS THAT GREEDY BANKERS CAUSED IT.
IN FACT THE BANKS ARE A SIDESHOW.
IT HAPPENED BECAUSE IN THREE SUCCESSIVE ELECTIONS, THE BRITISH PUBLIC WERE SEDUCED BY PROMISES OF SOMETHING FOR NOTHING, THAT YOU COULD SPEND MONEY YOU HADN’T EARNED WITH NO CONSEQUENCES.
IN JUST TEN YEARS, THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY UNDER TONY BLAIR AND GORDON BROWN INCREASED PUBLIC SPENDING BY 58% WHEN THE ECONOMY GREW ONLY 17%.
YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE A MATHEMATICIAN TO KNOW WHAT THAT LED TO.
THE UK NOW HAS A BLOATED STATE SECTOR THAT IT CAN’T AFFORD AND DARE NOT CUT BACK.
IT SEEMS THAT WHERE THE STATE IS CONCERNED THERE IS NO NO REVERSE GEAR. IT ONLY GETS BIGGER, NEVER SMALLER.
LIKE SO MANY OTHER COUNTRIES, THE UK TOOK ITS PROSPERITY FOR GRANTED.
THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR SHORTER HOURS.
LONGER VACATIONS.
EMPLOYEE PROTECTION LAWS THAT MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FIRE ANYONE.
A NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE THAT PUT OVER A MILLION OUT OF WORK.
LAYERS OF RED TAPE AND BUREAUCRACY STIFLE ENTERPRISE AND CHOKE THE LIFE OUT OF BUSINESS. HARDLY ANYONE WANTS TO INVEST IN BRITAIN NOW AND SOME VERY LARGE BUSINESSES ARE PLANNING TO LEAVE.
DURING LABOUR’S REIGN OF TERROR WE LOST A MILLION JOBS IN MANUFACTURING AND REPLACED THEM WITH A MILLION NEW JOBS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.
SO EVERY TOWN HALL NOW HAS ITS GENDER AWARENESS CO-ORDINATION DEPARTMENT BUT THE FACTORY DOWN THE ROAD IS BOARDED UP.
THE GOVERNMENT IN LONDON IS PINNING ITS HOPES ON GALLOPING ECONOMIC GROWTH - 2.5% A YEAR - WHICH WILL RAISE TAX REVENUES, REDUCE THE DEFICIT AND ELIMINATE THE NEED TO PRINT ANY MORE MONEY.
THIS IS THE PLAN.
WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE IS RIGHT NOW?
IT’S NEGATIVE. THE UK ECONOMY IS ACTUALLY SHRINKING.
PLUG THAT INTO THE TREASURY FORECASTS AND THE UK IS BUST.
I KNOW BECAUSE I’VE DONE THE NUMBERS. IT’S TOO SCARY FOR WORDS.
AND IT ISN’T JUST THE UK.
WESTERN EUROPE IN GENERAL IS COMMITTING SLOW ECONOMIC SUICIDE FOR MUCH THE SAME REASON..
EVERY YEAR THE EU COMMISSION AND POPULIST GOVERNMENTS – BOTH CENTRE RIGHT AND CENTRE LEFT - ANNOUNCE A RAFT OF NEW DIRECTIVES AND LAWS WHICH ALWAYS HAVE TWO THINGS IN COMMON:
THEY INCREASE THE SIZE AND INFLUENCE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR
AND
THEY RAISE THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ALL OVER THE WORLD, EVERY DAY, COMPANIES ARE MAKING DECISIONS ON WHERE TO BUILD THE NEXT FACTORY, THE NEXT R&D LABORATORY, THAT NEW SALES OR DISTRIBUTION CENTRE.
PRESENTATIONS ARE BEING MADE BY PEOPLE IN SUITS, PEOPLE LIKE ME.
THESE INVESTMENT DECISIONS HAPPEN EVERY DAY AND THEY WILL DRAMATICALLY AFFECT YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN.
I HAVE SAT IN MANY OF THESE MEETINGS MYSELF AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT TWO OF THE MOST POWERFUL INFLUENCES ON THE FINAL DECISION OF WHERE TO INVEST ARE TAXATION AND REGULATION.
THAT’S WHY PUNITIVE TAXES ON THE COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS WHO CREATE WEALTH ARE AN ACT OF ECONOMIC SUICIDE.
MAYBE SOCIALISTS GO TO BED WITH A SMILE ON THEIR FACE WHEN THE TOP RATE OF INCOME TAX IS RAISED, AS IT WAS RECENTLY IN THE UK, BUT WHO REALLY PAYS THE PRICE?
WEALTH CREATORS – COMPANIES AND PEOPLE - ARE MOBILE – THEY JUST MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE.
AND WHEN THEY GO THEY TAKE ALL THE JOBS AND TAX REVENUES WITH THEM. UNEMPLOYMENT GOES UP AND TAX REVENUES FALL.
IT’S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
REGULATION IS EQUALLY CORROSIVE.
NO COMPANY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND IS GOING TO INVEST IN A COUNTRY WHERE YOU CAN’T FIRE ANYONE, EVER, WHERE NOBODY IS ALLOWED TO WORK MORE THAN 35 HOURS A WEEK AND WHERE EVERYONE RETIRES AT 43 OR WHATEVER IT NOW IS IN GREECE.
POLITICIANS ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE INTRODUCING ALL THIS STUFF – AND IF YOU VOTED FOR THE SNAKE OIL SALESMEN WHO TOLD YOU WE COULD DO ALL THIS WITHOUT ANY IMPACT ON JOBS OR PROSPERITY YOU ARE ALSO TO BLAME. IN A DEMOCRACY YOU GET WHAT YOU VOTED FOR.
I AM FANATICALLY PRO-EUROPEAN.
I SPEAK FLUENT FRENCH AND ITALIAN AND I LOVE THE HISTORY, CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND RICHNESS OF EUROPEAN LIFE.
BUT I ALSO SEE EUROPE COMMITTING SLOW ECONOMIC SUICIDE.
WE LIVE IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY AND BUSINESS WILL GO ELSEWHERE IF WE DON’T MAKE EUROPE A GREAT PLACE TO INVEST AND REMOVE THE STRANGLEHOLD OF TAXES AND REGULATION THAT ARE CHOKING THE LIFE OUT OF ENTERPRISE.
CAPITALISM IS THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN.
IF YOU THINK THE ANSWER IS A NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC PLANNING – WHICH IS WHAT THE EU COMMISSION IN BRUSSELS IS BECOMING – THEN YOU ARE CONDEMNING YOUR CHILDREN TO GROW UP POORER THAN YOU.
YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE – ALL OF YOU – BUT YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICES.
DON’T WASTE YOUR TALENTS WAVING PLACARDS AND SENDING OUT ANGRY POSTS ON A BLOGGING SITE. THAT MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO THE LIVES OF ANYONE, ANYWHERE.
USE YOUR TALENTS TO MAKE THE MARKET ECONOMY EVER BETTER.
BE PART OF THE BLOOD TRANSFUSION.
THANKYOU.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Capitalism and the Corporation

...problem to be investigated is the role of corporation in society and its ethical influence on social responsibility. There have been arguments that capitalism and corporations are responsible for economic ills of the society. It is therefore necessary to understand the role of corporation and ethical influence if any. In other to address the problem stated above it is necessary to define what capitalism and corporation are, and give background insight through meaningful literature reviews. According to dictionary.com capitalism is an economic system in which investments, ownership and means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is driven and maintained mainly by private individuals or corporations, in contrast to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth. A corporation on the other hand is a business organization created by its owners known as stockholders under authority of the law to exist continuously independent of its members; powers and liabilities (limited liability) separated from those of its members.(American Heritage Dictionary). The answer to the problem stated above may be embedded in the "not a cold mete or fallen from the sky" statement of Dr. Novak (Jennings, 2012, p.108). Role of Corporation In Society The problem to be investigated is the role of corporation in society and its ethical influence on social responsibility. There have been arguments that capitalism and corporations are responsible for economic ills of the society It is therefore...

Words: 1724 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Business

...capitalist system   Throughout history of capitalism, there has been one persistent criticism. The whole system seems to be based on selfishness the more one works, the more one prospers. If one is unable to work, the system seems to have no answer to his or her problems. Furthermore, there does not seem to be any moral or spiritual foundation to the system. Where do businesses get their values? What about concepts such as sharing, helping neighbors, and protecting the environment? It is important to make a distinction between plain capitalism and democratic capitalism. Democratic capitalism is a system based on three components: (1) free enterprise; that is, freedom to own your own businesses and farms and freedom to keep the profits, (2) a freely elected government that has internal checks and balances, and (3) moral, ethical, and spiritual values that are part of the very fabric of the country and the business system. Plain capitalism is a system where there is free enterprise, but no freely elected government and no foundation of moral, ethical, and spiritual values. There are several “capitalist” countries headed by rightwing dictators that do not have democratic capitalism and do not have the relative prosperity and social justice that we have in the United States. Let’s explore democratic capitalism in more detail so that you can understand how the system works. One of the most important elements of democratic capitalism is its moral and spiritual base. When the U.S...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

To What Extent Should We Let Government Control Our Economy?

...financial crisis happen. The views on what roles the government should have in the economy range from capitalism, which is a belief that the economy should be controlled by individuals (hrw ESL dictionary 85), to communism, which is a belief that a social organization such as the state should control economy.(558) Most people adopt a view somewhere between these extremes, yet even those moderate views vary greatly. Because society put emphasis on productivity and profit, most economic systems in the world tend to be oriented toward capitalism instead of communism. Many believe that capitalism is immoral because it is based on profit, which they claim to be the result of egoistic actions. I personally think that it is not the system that is unethical, but more how it is used and what is done with it. It can be compared to a neutral instrument such as a knife, which can be used either to cut food or kill. There is no morality in the knife itself. In this essay, it will be argued that, unlike most beliefs, capitalism is a morally acceptable economic system. To support this claim, three premises will be used. First of all, the market economy on which capitalism is based upon, promotes mutual help and fair exchange. Also, under such a system, when an individual is pursuing his own interests, he is simultaneously increasing the general wealth of his society as well as his own. Lastly, capitalism facilitates exchanges with people outside of our circle of care by dealing with them voluntarily...

Words: 1780 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Explore the Ideas of Karl Marx

...“Explore the ideas of Karl Marx, discussing his theories and views toward capitalism. Discuss how these matters compare to modern day economic conditions, and consider the ethical and sustainability matters that are raised for today's managers.” Karl Marx; an economist, sociologist, revolutionary and historian, whose theories continue to influence economic thought for managers today. Karl Heinrich Marx (May 5,1818 – March 14, 1883) put forth many theories with regards to economics, politics and society that established the base on which Marxism was formed. His critique of the philosophies of other theorists and critical analysis of capitalism has influenced economic perception, and contributed largely toward the current understanding of capital and labour and the relationship that exists. In Karl Marx’s criticism of capitalism, he discussed many social matters such as ‘alienation’, the dominance by the ‘bourgeoisie’ over the ‘proletariat’; issues with regard to labour, such as the de-skilling and dehumanisation of workers as technological advances came about and capitalists strived to maximise ‘surplus value’ through the ‘exploitation’ of human labour. Although times have changed and this type of work environment is not as common, it is still an ever present situation in places such as China and India where cheap labour is employed to maximise the return for those in ‘control’. Advancements in technology continue, to the extent where the duties of workers can be performed...

Words: 3106 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Gvgrvgrgrgr

...innovation . He is the author of a History of Economic Analysis, published in 1954 and still refers. Neither Keynesian nor neoclassical, is often close to the Austrian School of Economics. It is considered economist excitement and it is called heterodox economist for his theories on the evolution of capitalism in democracy, he believes doomed to disappear for social and political reasons. Schumpeter leaves hardly classify an economic school. Whether it was Austrian , he has never been part of the Austrian School with which he was familiar with the teachings of Eugen von Böhm- Bawerk at the University of Vienna. The economist he admired most was undoubtedly Leon Walras , but his analysis goes beyond the neoclassical framework . He was also heavily influenced by the writings of the German sociologist Max Weber. And if he shared some conclusions with Karl Marx, his analysis was very far from Marxist economic designs. Is actually the founder of general economic evolutionism . It is therefore listed in the circle called "heterodox" economists. He believes that the foundation and spring dynamics of the economy are innovation and technical progress. The history of capitalism is a permanent moult. Technology evolves, turns pushing swathes of economic activity to wither and disappear after being dominant. Structural change is prior to quantitative. The purpose of this paper is to talk about the influence of Max Weber on Schumpeter’s thought,with respect to their central visions...

Words: 1911 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Bgs Models

...business, government, and society are infinite and their meaning is open to interpretation. Faced with this complexity, many people use simple mental models to impose order and meaning on what they observe. These models are like prisms, each having a different refractive quality, each giving the holder a different view of the world. Depending on the model (or prism) used, a person will think differently about the scope of business power in society, criteria for managerial decisions, the extent of corporate responsibility, the ethical duties of managers, and the need for regulation. The following four models are basic alternatives for seeing the BGS relationship. As abstractions they oversimplify reality and magnify central issues. Each model can be both descriptive and prescriptive; that is, it can be both an explanation of how the BGS relationship does work and, in addition, an ideal about how it should work. The Market Capitalism Model The market capitalism model, shown in Figure 1.2, depicts business as operating within a market environment, responding primarily to powerful economic forces. There, it is substantially sheltered from direct impact by social and political forces. The market acts as a buffer between business and nonmarket forces. To appreciate this model, it is important to understand the history and nature of markets and the classic explanation of how they work. Markets are as old as humanity, but for most of recorded history they were a minor institution....

Words: 1872 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Max Webers Protestant Ethic & the Spirit of Capatalism

...Max Weber “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” Max Webers “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” is an analysis as to the relationship between the emergence of the spirit of capitalism in the west and the ethics of Calvinism. He argues that Calvinism catalysed this creation of the capitalist spirit. His study arose when he asked himself why capitalism had emerged out of Western Europe before anywhere else in the world, even though the economic conditions seemed identical in many of these places. In this essay I will argue that this relationship between the two isn’t as paramount as Weber suggests, and in fact may be completely arbitrary. I believe this for a number of reasons including the distorting effect Webers use of a “ideal type” has and the fact that some areas where Calvinism was practiced heavily Capitalism developed a lot later in, while others with no Calvinist beliefs still did develop Capitalism. Weber starts his analyse looking at the intrinsic relationship between religion and business. He emphasises how sect membership is a sign that you are trustworthy and will be a good business partner, as admission to one of these congregations only happens after a careful probation, where your conduct, back to early childhood, is assessed and checked for any kind of frivolity. Admission therefore is a guarantee of the moral qualities of someone, it is a badge of honour showing you have those qualities that are required in business matters...

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Capitalism Is Wrong With Capitalism

...produce? How much should we produce? And who is making those decisions. Capitalism is the economic system agreed upon in the United States of America. In the recent discussions of the efficacity of...

Words: 1756 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Capitalism and Invisible Hand

...Capitalism & the Invisible Hand Throughout the history of civilization have been two forms of social administrations: Individualism which has taken the form of capitalism and collectivism which has taken many different forms, each form different from one another, such as socialism, communism, nazism, and etc. Capitalism is an economic system in which most of the means of production and distribution, such as businesses or factories, are not owned by the government but by the private individuals who operate them for profits. (“13b. Comparing Economic Systems.”) In the center of the free-market capitalism is the individual who has four basic rights: • The right to own private property. • The right to own a business and to keep the profits made by operating his business. • The right to freedom of competition. • The right of freedom of choice. (Nickels, Understanding Business) On the other hand, socialism is an economic system that calls for putting most of the means of production in the hands of government which will share the wealth and income more equally among people.( Nickels, Understanding Business) The main goal of socialism is to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. Thus, the government has the responsibility to evenly distribute the wealth in order to make the society just and fair. (“13b. Comparing Economic Systems.”) An individual attempts to become wealthy, which explains why his focus is only on profits, but to achieve this goal he has to exchange...

Words: 974 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Capitalism

...Due to the limited resources and unlimited human wants, whole world faces problem of scarcity. Therefore, capitalism is needed to solve these production decision such as what and how to produce the goods and services and distribution decision such as for whom to produce the goods and services. Capitalism is an economic system in which the major portion of production and distribution is in private hands, operating under what is termed a profit or market system. In the country which works on capitalism system, the production and distribution decisions are made by private individuals who are free to pursue their self-interest and their decisions are coordinated and communicated through price signals which also means by profit motive in the market. I believe that the morality of capitalism is debatable, whether the capitalism is moral or immoral have to view it from different sides of perspective. Utilitarianism said that an action is judged as right, good, or wrong on the basis of its consequences. It emphasizes that greatest good for the greatest number of people. In other words, the goods have to be maximized for everyone affected by the decision (Weiss J.W., 2008). When all the costs are added and compared with the results, if the benefits outweigh the costs, then the action may be considered ethical. In a capitalist economic system, individuals have natural rights to property. They can possess, use and dispose the means of production or distribution such as equipment, machines...

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Social Theory

...Zain Muzaffar Social Theory Thomas Long 11/13/2013 Social Theory Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, is credited with establishing and developing the idea of a communist society in response to modern capitalism in the early 1800's. Communism is the theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all its members. Marx described human history as the attempt to control nature in order to improve the human condition. The party was formed to support and promote the common interests of the proletariat. The labor market is penetrated thorough the means of social capitalism that is endorsed from the buying and selling power of companies that promote the circular flow of products in the buying market of financial capital distributed and dispersed through financial capital gains of the economy buying and selling products that commodities of social Marxism. The Marx’s view of capitalism, and the idea of commodity fethisms is the ideal perception of social relationships involved in production, and not talking about the relationships among people but the economic concept of commodities exchanged in the marketplace. The economic value of products that are commodities in the social market are circulated as forms of capital merchants who are competing for financial capital gains, and mediated forms of monetary exchange that is contributed to the GDP, and the...

Words: 1914 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Final Exam Prep

...Moral Philosophies Consequentialist theories. The morality (right vs wrong) of an action is judged entirely by its on consequences. Right and wrong are determined by the outcome of an action. “The end justifies the means” -Egoism -Utilitarianism Non consequentialist theories Based on inputs and intentions Actions are intrinsically good or bad by themselves. The right or wrong of these actions is not determined by their consequences. Utilitarianism Actions are judged by how much they benefit the majority. The greatest good for the greatest number of people. It is ethical to make the minority unhappy or suffer to create the greatest good The various ways of defining the greatest good should be taken into consideration. Promulgated by John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham Act Utilitarianism Every act has an individual moral obligation. Rule Utilitarianism Apply utilitarianism to a set of rules that will benefit the majority. Kantian Ethics Intention based The categorical Imperative contains three maxims. Universality: You should only do something if you think it would be ok if everyone did it all the time. E.g. cheating in business, if everyone did it the economy would collapse. Every human should be treated as an end not a means to an end: So you can’t manipulate people to achieve an end. Contrasts to consequentialism which is based on ‘the greater good’. Means you cannot lie, (example about com101 being fav class) Act as if you were...

Words: 2581 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

The Morality of Capitalism

...Thesis Capitalism has been the subject of ethical criticism since it was first introduced into society. I defend the morality of capitalism because it gives people incentive to work, establishes a web of trust between them, satisfies their material well-being, and generates a wide spectrum of prosperity. Exposition As citizens of the United States, we are members of the leading capitalist economy in the world. Our production and distribution is mostly done privately and we operate in a “profit” or “market” system. The capitalist system has been a target for criticism throughout the last three hundred years and is being discussed now more than ever due to the recent recession and financial crisis (Shaw and Barry n.d., 1). Its effects, structure, varieties, and possibilities provide for a large field of study and writers from several different disciplines have provided their input to the debate. Most fundamental is the question of whether our capitalist system is a morally justifiable one. This question can’t be answered by reviewing the efficiency and productivity capitalism provides, but instead requires a thorough analysis of ethics. A capitalist society is characterized by the private ownership of property and a free market that grants citizens the right to use their resources for their own benefit. Private property is the ownership of productive resources like companies, stocks, and bonds and should not be confused with personal property. Personal property consists...

Words: 2675 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ethical Treatment of Shareholders and Workers in a Traditional, Capitalist Corporation; the Ford Motor Company and Compare and Contrast the Findings with the Treatment of These Stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation.

...This essay will aim to investigate the ethical treatment of shareholders and workers in a traditional, capitalist corporation; The Ford Motor Company and compare and contrast the findings with the treatment of these stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation. The structure of this essay will be as follows; firstly the fundamental differences between the two contrasting organisations will be examined and how these differences impact the ethical treatment of the relevant stakeholders; secondly, the ethical treatment of shareholders in regards to corporate governance and the executive’s accountability and control will be investigated, and lastly, the ethical treatment of workers within the two contrasting organisations will be scrutinized in relation to the employees right to participation and association, as well as the right to fair wages. To frame the purpose of this essay; to investigate the ethical treatment of shareholders and workers in a traditional, capitalist corporation compared to the treatment of these stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation, it is imperative to firstly examine the contrasting ideologies and points of difference between the two ways of organising. In understanding the fundamental differences between the two contrasting organisations, it is then possible to recognise the ethical dilemmas that arise for both shareholders and workers. The fundamental differences between a traditional capitalist corporation and the Mondragon Cooperative...

Words: 2184 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Essay

...online discussion we discussed whether "capitalism benefits everybody". Purpose of this discussion was to analyse the importance of sociological imagination and ethical reasoning for better understanding of business, society and government relationship under capitalism, it was valuable to know each other's opinions, knowledge and understanding on the topic. Sociological imagination can be defined as the social analysis of behaviour and traits of business, society and government that assist us in representing images from our previous experience and knowledge, because of each other's uniqueness it was interesting to discuss about this topic and to get a broader response. After participating in the online discussion I can define capitalism as an economic and political system in which a county's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit rather than by the government. There are both advantages and disadvantages to capitalism in Australia but it truly benefits everyone including the Business sector, Government and Society. Since the economic and political systems are controlled by the private sector to gain profit, it'll encourage the owners and the employees to be efficient and produce quality goods and services. This will increase GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in Australia, and therefore it will also increase the country’s economy which will benefit both the government and the society. As most of us have discussed capitalism definitely benefits the society, because...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4