Free Essay

Fall of Aig

In: Business and Management

Submitted By menzez7
Words 3262
Pages 14
INTRODUCTION AIGFP was founded in 1987. Henry Sosin and two others persuaded CEO Hank Greenberg to create a division focused on investments that fed on AIG’s AAA rating. AIGFP had made more than $60 million in the first six months. Sosin left in 1993 and was replaced as CEO by Tom Savage. In 1998, AIGFP had revenue of $500 million and had yet to divulge in credit-default swaps. However, later that year, with the backing of Joe Cassano, who was at the time COO, Savage signed off on the backing of JP Morgan’s complex debt. This is where credit-default swaps were first acted on. These credit-default swaps were a series of payments made to a buyer in which the seller would compensate the buyer if the buyer defaulted on the loan. In 2000, Cassano took over as CEO. According to the numbers, the company had brought in over $1 billion that year. In 2002, it came out that AIGFP had helped conceal the bad assets of PNC Financial services by setting up a “special purpose entity” to undertake the assets. By 2004, AIG had paid an $80 million fine for helping conceal these bad assets. Later in 2005, rumors about bad accounting practices were going around and Hank Greenberg stepped down as his role of CEO. When he did this, credit-rating agencies dropped AIG’s credit rating from AAA to AA. This required AIGFP to have over $1 billion in collateral for their credit default swaps. After taking a second look at the portfolio, it became alarming that many of the credit-default swaps had to deal with subprime mortgages, meaning that the default risk was large if the housing market went under. By the end of 2005, Cassano had wisely chosen to stop dealing in credit-default swaps, but he could not undue the $80 billion of collateralized debt. However, Cassano stuck to the idea that they could he could not see how they could lose anything on these investments. In August 2007, the housing market plummeted and companies, starting with Goldman Sachs, required collateral from AIG that was insuring the mortgage backed securities. By November, AIG’s stock prices had plummeted 25 percent, and AIGFP recognized a loss of $352 million. Even with this, Cassano and Sullivan still tried to convince investors that everything was alright. Losses of $11.8 billion had been calculated by February of 2008. Cassano stepped down as CEO on March 31, but he left with consulting contract worth $1 million a month. In September, credit agencies planned to again drop AIG’s credit rating, causing them to have to have more collateral that they could not back. To insure this did not happen, on September 16, the Federal Reserve took control of 80 percent of AIG when it gave them an $85 billion dollar “loan” or bailout (The Rise).
EXPLANATION OF THE AIG COLLAPSE
“Managers perform several basic managerial functions: planning, directing/leading, organizing, staffing, and controlling. They should manage in a way that brings good people into the organization and makes good people want to stay. Managers, especially immediate supervisors, largely determine whether employees stay with or leave a company” (Crews 5). “Managers should remove employees whose behavior indicates they are not trustworthy to ensure the long-term interests of the company” (Crews 5a). Because of illegal accounting practices and hiding losses through an overseas company, Greenberg was removed from his position. AIG dropped from its AAA rating. Five others received jail time for conspiracy and fraud (Cass Business School 6). AIG had multiple people involved in fraud or conspiracy, showing good people were not brought into this organization and it caused problems. Instead of bringing in ethical employees, AIG brought in those who only cared about results. These employees were involved in illegal practices such as fraud that led to the downfall of AIG. An ex-AIG executive explained why he thinks that Greenberg was the main cause of the problem. He explains that Greenberg left a gap in the system. While it may not have fallen apart until he left, what he left was not much. Instead, he left a broken workplace. And of course he would! No one wanted to work for him. He was a terrible person (Cohan). This shows us the character of Greenberg. His ethics were not where they should have been and therefore it caused those around him to hate working for him. Managers’ demeanor helps bring in good employees. Because no one wanted to work for Greenberg, it was harder for him to bring in ethical workers. Therefore, those who did stay had similar ideas to Greenberg, and were unwilling to check his unethical behavior that ultimately led to the downfall of AIG. Also, Greenberg only kept those around who would work as hard as him. He said that a company like AIG is not founded on a normal work schedule. He went on to state that in order to make a company like AIG work, co-workers who believe the same thing and strive for the same ideas are vital (O’Harrow and Brady “The Beautiful Machine”). Training is a critical part of leadership. Instead of training well-rounded employees, Greenberg looked for those who only focused on working hard. Many times, this is actually a good idea. However, Greenberg instilled in his employees the drive to make money. Greenberg only focused on the short-term rise in the company and he ensured that his employees would go along with him instead of looking for a more ethical way to succeed, causing there to be no regulation of his actions. Without proper information, managers often will make incorrect and flawed decisions. This is a result of the business conclusions being very difficult to work with and conflicting priorities (Crews 7). “Managers weigh profits against ethical concerns. Unfortunately, many companies focus on short-term concerns instead of long-term measures of success. Likewise, many companies reward managers based on short-term measures, whereas ethical behavior almost always requires a concern for long-term reputation and profitability” (Crews 7a). AIGFP turned into a dictatorship. Cassano intimidated his co-workers. In exchange for large sums of money, he belittled and harassed them (Lewis). Cassano only cared about making money in the short-term. He did not focus on the high risk that his volatile investments carried with them. He also had little care for the work environment. He would make it terrible as long as he got the results he wanted. In the process, he sent a message to his employees that said money was the only thing that mattered. He only cared that the results were achieved, not how they were achieved. This led to the large involvement in credit-default swaps. Being very lucrative, Cassano focused on these swaps and the large profit they were earning AIG. However, he only focused on the profit, not on the idea that they did not have the collateral to back up these swaps, which in turn, led to the collapse of AIG. Greenberg can name all of the errors that Sullivan, Cassano, and the company made. AIGFP greatly increased the salve of credit default swaps instead of limiting them. These were no longer just issued on corporate debt but on a much different risk that Wall Street was endorsing by the issuance of progressively unsafe mortgage-backed securities that are connected to Alt-A and subprime mortgages (Cohan). Increasing the salve of credit default swaps was a very risky move. Limiting the risk that they already had should have been the focus of management. Instead, profits outweighed everything for them and they did not care about the risk they were adding to AIG. They did not want to bother with the “safe” move, but only with the move that would potentially be the most profitable for them. It started out to be very profitable; however, they did not have the collateral to back up the insurance they sold. By focusing more on these default swaps, they were writing down profits before the money was actually made and these profits ended up not coming in. Because of this, AIG could not pay back what they owed to people, causing the company to collapse. AIG’s achievements were earned by analyzing data, always revamping assumptions, balancing risks and manufacturing the hedges. These credit-default swaps required none of that. Savage also said that looking back, the deals should not have happened (Brady and O’Harrow). Managers sometimes do not make the correct decisions. As Savage points out, the deals should never have happened. In retrospect, it was easy for him to see how much they could hurt the company. They were too risky and all the factors pointed to the fact that it was the wrong decision. These credit-default swaps had too much risk attached to them and even though they were profitable, they were the main factor in the destruction of AIG. The reason for this is because; put in simple terms, it was a fraud. These swaps brought about too many losses and AIG was not able to recover, causing the world’s largest insurance company to fall. The workplace often brings out compliance in most people. Because of this, the proper authority can get workers to do whatever they are told. This being the case, workers can be influenced by the managerial staff to do things that may be unethical, sometimes without the employee even knowing it is wrong. In the cases where they do, employees have to make a choice. Many times employees will just do as they are told so that they can keep their jobs. Occasionally they will quit and go to a different job to circumvent the problem. Very seldom an employee becomes a snitch, which hardly ever works in their favor (Crews 3). Because Greenberg managed greater than 17 percent of outstanding shares and he had complete control over his subordinates’ job future, he was not going to be questioned or replaced (Boyd 56). Because the employees did not want to lose their jobs, they were willing to do whatever Greenberg wanted, even if it meant doing something for him that was unethical. This had a direct effect to the collapse in 2008. It was clear that some of the things Greenberg was doing were unethical and should have been challenged, yet no one stepped in to stop him in time.
The harsh environment of Enron, Independent, and AIG from the companies Chief Executives stifled works from fighting the issues that are in the company (Cass Business School 17). This is a direct link to the unethical behavior of the managerial staff. Instead of trying to encourage people to let them know what is going wrong, they intimidated them so the workers would not bring up the issues. The managers saw what they were doing was profitable, even if risky and unethical, and wanted to keep it that way. So instead to trying to change their ways, they intimidated those who would normally speak out so that there were no issues brought up.
Formed of Greenberg’s trusted contacts and associates as well as renown ex-politicians and statesmen that brought standing, the board was not likely to have the means necessary to stand up to Greenberg and his unclear decision about reinsurance transactions. They certainly would not look into AIGFP and its market models (Cass Business School 8). Because they were Greenberg’s friends, Greenberg was allowed to work in the reinsurance transactions that, if monitored, would have been seen as very dangerous for the company because it was a sham in order to make his financial statements look better. Greenberg was committing fraud and covering up losses that should have been seen by the board but were not. If seen and stopped, the collapse of AIG could have been less severe.
“Stakeholders, including boards of directors, consumers, investors, whistleblowers, auditors, lawyers, rating agencies, and regulatory agencies, are supposed to hold managers and businesses accountable for their decisions and actions. In reality, legal, auditing, rating, and/or regulatory weaknesses often contribute to ethics scandals” (Crews 11). Bernake state that AIG found a loophole in the regulatory system. Nothing was monitoring the Financial Products division. This giant insurance company had a hedge fund on the side (Saporito et al.). The regulatory system is supposed to hold the managers accountable, yet it let AIG have an unregulated “hedge fund” and did not monitor the fraud that was taking place.
Boards dominated by insiders and CEOs have control over major corporations (Vasudev 790). As mentioned earlier, the board was a group of people unwilling the challenge Greenberg, and this allowed him to have complete control over the company and he did not have leave much control for other stakeholders. Because of this, when he decided to hide the losses that AIG was actually having, only the board had the power to stop him and they were unwilling.
Many people question how and why the AIGFP deterioration began. This is because of a change in how the business decisions were made. This happened because the leadership had changed. Cassano was appointed CEO of AIGFP. Savage, its former CEO, had been versed in mathematics and understood what was happening within AIG, but Cassano did not have these qualifications and lacked the skills necessary for his position (Lewis). AIG needed a better regulatory system in place to realize that Cassano did not have the necessary skills for this position. Although he was a much respected businessman, when dealing with risky investments, qualifications in advanced mathematics are needed. The regulatory system of AIG should have held the management and Cassano accountable when it was clear that he did not fully understand the risk he was immersing the company into.
CONSEQUENCES TO IMPORTANT STAKEHOLDERS
AIG was obviously majorly affected by their collapse. In September of 2008, they became largely owned by the government when the government gave them an $85 billion dollar loan to cover some of their losses and insure that the company did not completely collapse. Stock price, which were once valued at over $70 per share dropped to $2.21 per share the day after the bailout.
The United States government was negatively affected by the collapse of AIG. This “too big to fail” idea left the government with a hard decision. They could either bailout AIG and start helping them rebuild and help them work through this tough time, or they could let them fall and cause the collapse of other huge firms. Bailing them out, while not a great choice, was the only option. Because of this the government took a 79.9% stake in AIG and gave them a $85 million loan. Since then, the government has given them over $180 million of the taxpayers’ money. The government received a lot of backlash from this because many taxpayers did not understand the affect it would have on the world if the government had allowed them to fail.
Hank Greenberg also took a big hit during this collapse. Formerly the CEO of AIG, Greenberg was forced to step down from his position and is now undergoing civil charges that have yet to have been resolved. Also, Greenberg owned a large portion of stock in AIG. During the collapse, his portion which was once value at over $700 million had dropped to $28 million. Although this is still an abundant wealth, this is a massive loss to his portfolio. Greenberg also owned a lot of stock through Starr International. Starr’s shares were once valued at $15.8 billion and have since dropped to $470 million. So even though he still has plenty of money, he lost 96 percent of his investment.
The United States taxpayers were also greatly affected by the fall of AIG. The collapse has cost taxpayers $170 billion as of now, and this number could continue to rise. The United States government and many taxpayers were outraged to hear where some of that money was going. AIG had paid out $165 million in bonuses to those at AIGFP, which had caused the collapse and bailout in the first place. Even though this was a small amount compared to the big picture, it still was putting the taxpayers’ money straight into the pockets of those who had brought about the fall ((Saporito et al.).
Finally, shareholders in AIG took the largest hit after its collapse. Overall, shareholders lost $170 billion dollars in the collapse. Many of these people relied on this money for retirement and future living. Even though they may not have individually lost as much as someone like Greenberg, they also were not left with an amount like $28 million. With this problem taking years to resolve, shareholders’ investment will likely never return anywhere close to its original state.
LESSONS LEARNED The first lesson that I learned was that it should be a high priority to be ethical. Now this may seem like an obvious thing, but it clearly is not. A manager has a duty to perform his tasks in an ethical manner and to higher those who will do the same. With AIG, many problems could have been avoided as fraud ultimately led to their collapse. The second lesson that I learned is transparency is important. Had Cassano and other leaders in AIG been transparent with what was going on in AIGFP, it would have been a warning call to investors that something like this can be very volatile. Instead, AIG managers kept saying that they saw no way the credit-default swaps could lose money. Also, they were not being transparent where the money they had was going. High ranking managers were receiving large bonuses while the company was failing and the information was not disclosed at the proper time. Finally, I learned that employees should be the focus of a company. If ethical, hard-working employees are brought into the company and trained, the company is put in a good spot to flourish. A company’s main goal should be centered on ethical practices, and the only way to ensure that is to bring in ethical employees. Inevitably, they will not be able to do this perfectly; however, if done well enough other employees should be able to recognize unethical decisions and stop them before they are finalized. Overall, companies need to hold employees to a high ethical standard to ensure that things like this do not happen.

WORK CITED PAGE
Boyd, Roddy. Fatal Risk. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey. 2011.
Brady, Dennis and Rober O'Harrow Jr. "A Crack in the System." Washington Post. 30 December 2008: A1.
Cass Business School. "Roads to Ruin: The Analysis." 15 January 2014. http://www.airmic.com/roads-ruin-study-major-risk-events-their-origins-impacts-and-implications.
Cohan, William D. "Collapse of the House of Hank." Institutional Investor. 44, 3 (2010): 40-84.
Crews, Sandra. "Tragic Truism Handout" Management 3200. 2014.
Lewis, Michael. "The Man Who Crashed the World." 2009. 15 January 2014. http://haraldhau.com/The_Man_Who_Crashed_the_World.pdf.
O'Harrow, Robert and Dennis Brady. "The Beautiful Machine." Washington Post. 29 December 2008: A1.
Saporito, Bill, Massimo Calabresi, Michael Duffy, Jay Newton-Small, Michael Scherer, Mark Thompson, Michael Weisskopf, and Adam Zagorin. "How AIG Became Too Big to Fail." Time. 173, 12 (2009): 24-30.
"The Rise And Fall Of AIG's Financial Products Unit." Talking Points Memo. TPM, 20 Mar. 2009. Web. 02 Apr. 2014.
Vasudev, P. M. "Default Swaps and Director Oversight: Lessons from AIG." The Journal of Corporation Law. 35, 4 (2010): 757-797.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Aig Scandal

...On March 14, Maurice “Hank” Greenberg resigned his position as CEO of American International Group (AIG) amidst allegations of fraud and accounting manipulations at the world’s largest insurer. In an attempt to contain an escalating scandal, the company fired two more top executives on March 21, including the chief financial officer, Howard Smith. Though not a household name, AIG is the 10th-largest corporation in the United States. It has close ties to the political establishment, counting on its board of directors William Cohen, the former defense secretary in the Clinton administration, and Richard Holbrooke, the former US ambassador to the United Nations. Greenberg, who remains the chairman of the board of directors, has long been considered the titan of the insurance industry. In 1987, Ronald Reagan offered him the number-two position at the Central Intelligence Agency, presumably because of his international connections, particularly in Southeast Asia. He declined the nomination. Because of its enormous size and international reach, the investment firm Payne Webber wrote in 2000, “We have come to view AIG as almost the equivalent of a sovereign corporate nation, with its own diplomatic ties, economy, and head of state.” The evidence of fraud—including recent revelations as well as information that has come to light over the past year—suggests that AIG arranged deals to manipulate financial figures, both its own and those of other companies. It is yet another indication...

Words: 1899 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Business Ethics

...The fallen Giant AIG is the story of a company and its network of financial partners, who took unprotected risk and fell because of it. To prevent global economic disaster, the U.S. government came to its rescue. This has resulted in the biggest taxpayer bailout of a private company in American history. American International Group, Inc. is a company whose operation began back in 1919. It was established back then by Cornelius Vander Starr as an insurance agency in Shanghai, China. AIG left china in 1949 after Starr had established himself as the westerner the sell insurance to the Chinese people. AIG headquarters then shifted from china to New York City after the communist came to power, which is still the headquarters up to date. It is from here that AIG began its expansion tapping into other markets such as the Latin America, Asia, Middle East and Europe through use of its subsidiaries.In 1962, Starr gave management of the company’s lagging U.S. holdings to Maurice R. Greenberg, who shifted its focus onto selling insurance through independent brokers rather than agents. The start of the problems faced by AIG began during the occupancy of Greenberg as AIGs' CEO. It was during tenure that the corporation expanded from its original line of insurance into other many complex lines of business and insuring risks that only a few other companies would consider handling. This led to the involvement of the company in businesses that it did not fully comprehend. AIG started investing...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Aig Scandal

...Group (AIG) and American International Group Financial Products (AIGFP) were directly in the center of the collapse. Within AIG and AIGFP, a few managers stood out when it came to involvement in the financial scandal. Maurice “Hank” Greenberg is one manager that undeniably stands out. He was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of AIG until 2005. He micromanaged his workers and gave them little freedom (Bandler, Boyd, and Burke). Obviously, his managing tactics influenced the demographics of AIG tremendously. Joe Cassano, another core manager, was the CEO of AIGFP. He implemented credit-default swaps (CDSs) and oversold them, resulting in AIG having to file for bankruptcy because it couldn’t pay the buyers of these CDSs back (Serwer and Sloan). While these two men were heavily involved in the cause of the collapse, they raised many questions regarding the fact that AIG’s questionable decisions passed regulations and audits. Many people have looked into how AIG and AIGFP didn’t cause fuss while they were getting audited. How did they pass all of these regulations without any problems? It has been noted that Greenberg had previous relations with a lot of so-called “big-shots” in the business world that could have had an impact on the results of these audits and regulation checks (Cass Business School). This may or may not have influenced the result of AIG during 2007 and could have potentially prevented the financial crisis if regulators did end up lying about AIG. Many...

Words: 2991 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Who Is Responsible for Aig Bailout

...share responsibility for the AIG bailout situation. The first fault lies with the ratings agencies. These agencies (S&P, Moody’s) gave AAA ratings – the highest level of creditworthiness – to the underlying securities that backed the CDS’ that AIG sold. This misrepresentation of the nature of these securities occurred either because of negligence on the part of the ratings agencies or by fraud. In either case, AIG perhaps did not realize that the securities on which they were basing their CDS’ contained a high percentage of subprime loans. AIG also must take responsibility for its actions. If the company did not realize that the AAA ratings were a sham, it should have. The company is in the finance business and was essentially placing a $400 billion bet on these products. It is irresponsible for a company to sell that much of a product – especially considering the importance of CDS’ to the top and bottom lines – without knowing what they are selling. If they did realize that these securities were not as secure as the agencies indicated and misrepresented them to customers, then AIG should shoulder most of the blame. The final component of blame should fall to the Federal Reserve. In this situation, the Fed (and White House) should have ensured that if they were going to bail out AIG and take over 80% of the company, controls should have been put into place to ensure that the taxpayers receive their money back. Profligate spending at AIG should not have been allowed...

Words: 317 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Business Ethics

...24 September 2010-WEEK SIX Case Study Six Coping with Financial and Ethical Risks at American International Group (AIG) I. Introduction American International Group (AIG) a leading American insurance organization operating in 130 countries. Established in Shanghai, China by Cornelius Starr; Starr was the first to sell insurance to the Chinese. In the 1960s Starr handed control of AIG to Maurice Greenberg who remained the company's chief executive officer until 2005. II. Response to Question #1 If the corporate culture of AIG was a contributing factor in the downfall of the company, Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg would have to be placed under the microscope and thoroughly examined as he would be held liable for creating such a culture. Maurice R. Greenberg was the chairman of the American International Group from 1968 to 2005, during which time he built the small insurance company into what became the world's largest insurance and financial services corporation (Times, 2010). From its beginning, AIG was at the front of the line in regards to the Global Market. Global business practices were embedded into the framework of the corporation and allowed AIG to conduct business successfully overseas. The company found its new home in New York in the 1940s and continued to operate fairly in the insurance market. When Greenberg took over as CEO, the company was not performing well. This forced Greenberg to adapt a win at all cost approach to business. Although his concepts...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Aig Fair or Foul?

...The Ethical Dilemma of AIG Fair or Foul? A matter of public opinion. American International Group (AIG) was established in 1919 by Cornelius Vander Starr in Shanghai, China. He became the first westerner in Shanghai to sell insurance to the Chinese. After turbulent times and the hostile takeover of the communist regime, he left for greener pastures in 1949 and ended up in New York City. While in New York, the company began to grow and prosper. I wide range of premium services was being offered and the future looked bright. The company went public in 1969. Fast-forward thirty-five years, no one could have prepared for what was about to happen. In 2005 an accounting scandal rocked AIG to the tune of $1.6 billion. Criminal charges were filed against many of the company’s top executives. The summer of 2008 was a time that began to send shockwaves around all of the world markets. Financial statements were disclosed and stock prices began to fall rapidly. On September 16, 2008 AIG suffered a liquidity crisis following the downgrade of its credit rating. Industry practice permitted firms with the highest credit ratings to engage in high-risk investment practices. Credit default swaps without depositing any form of collateral with their trading counter-parties. The Federal Reserve announced the creation of a secured credit facility of up to $85 billion to keep the company from completely collapsing. In exchange, the government would receive an 80% equity...

Words: 559 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Insurance Company Report

...Insurance Sector Analysis Project Details: Subject: Financial Management Topic: Insurance Sector analysis Teacher in charge: KB sir Made by: 1. Abhinav Aggrawal, BFIA 1A Roll number: 75101 2. Akhil Bedi, BFIA 1A Roll number: 75107 3. Jessica Singh BFIA 1A Roll number: 75124 Teacher Remarks: Contents Insurance Sector Analysis 1 Project Details: 2 Acknowledgement 4 An Overview of the project: 5 Objective: 5 A Brief History 8 Insurance Sector: Growth 9 Life insurance: 10 General Insurance 11 Ratio Analysis 13 Return on Equity 14 Combined Ratio 15 Debt Equity 17 Loss Ratio 18 Financial Statement Analysis 19 Profit 20 Share Capital 22 Reserves 24 Premium 26 Investments 28 References 30 Acknowledgement We would like to express our gratitude towards KB sir, who gave us the golden opportunity to peep into the financial world, and comprehend and adopt the techniques of analysis and interpretation. Alongside, he has also guided and directed the progress of this project as a member itself, assisting us at every dead lock. We are really thankful to him. Secondly, we would also like to thank the college authority for facilitating such an exposure and providing amenities that made this project possible. Lastly we would like to express appreciation towards each other for the cooperation and commitment shown by each member of the group, which helped shape this project within the limited time. Thank you...

Words: 5451 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

Business

...AIG Presentation Matthew Fong Minkyung Lee Yesl Lee Koo chul Jung Contents History of AIG Financial Crisis of AIG Bailout Policy Bonus Payments Outrage Conclusion Bibliography Cornelius Vander Starr - Established an insurance agency in Shanghai, China. -The first Westerner in Shanghai to sell insurance to the Chinese in 1949. -Management of the company’s lagging U.S and holdings to Maurice R. Greenberg. M.R.Greenberg -American businessman and former chairman and CEO of AIG -The world’s 18th largest public company. -Selling insurance through independent brokers rather than agents to eliminate agent salaries. -Currently CEO of C.V.Starr and Company. 1919 American Asiatic Underwriters(AAU) -Sell American insurances in Shanghai. Asia Life Insurance Company - Target is Chinese to sell life insurance - Hong Kong, Indonesia, Philippine, Jakarta. 1926 American International Underwriters(AIU) - Header agent in America, they were guarantee for American’s accidents.(started from Home foreign business) -New strong agent in Latin America around 1930~45 1968 -Starr died and Greenberg became a CEO 1970 -Greenberg was succeeded as CEO by Martin J,Sullivan. -Martin J. Sullivan began his career at AIG in London Office. 1984 -AIG listed their stocks on New York stocks exchanges and AIG be came the largest insurance company. 2005 -Became embroiled in a series of fraude investigations conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission...

Words: 1169 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Aig Incomplete

...Title: American Insurance Group (AIG) Group Name: Date: Executive Summary: Company Background American International Group, Inc. (AIG) is a world leader in insurance and financial services. It is a holding company for a network of subsidiaries primarily engaged in insurance and insurance-related activities, including property, casualty, life, financial services, retirement savings products, asset management, and aircraft leasing. It is headquartered in New York City, and operates in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions. In 2006, AIG had sales of $113 billion and 116,000 employees (Saporito, 2009). According to the 2008 Forbes Global 2000 list, AIG was once the 18th-largest public company in the world. Its common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, as well as the stock exchanges in Ireland and Tokyo. AIG faltered in America’s sub-prime mortgage crisis. It had traded heavily in credit default swaps and could not meet its obligations. In that case, United States government came to its rescue with an $85 billion bailout on September 16, 2008. As of March 2009, AIG has taken a major step toward cleaning up its image by reorganizing its insurance units under American International Underwriters. It is the foreign general insurance segment of AIG. AIU and its subsidiary brands are now distinct from AIG (National News, 2009). The holding company, itself, is currently undergoing rebranding that includes a new name, which is expected to be revealed in the near...

Words: 1258 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Aig Report

...AIG continued to streamline its core insurance operations and restructure businesses, over the past few years, to enhance capital allocation and operating leverage. For this, AIG has been using the proceeds gained from the disposition of redundant businesses along with earnings from its ongoing business operations. The gradual recovery in the economy and equity market, post the downturn in 2008, has helped AIG to recoup the value of its investments and dispose of its redundant and risky businesses at attractive valuations. This in turn has helped in consistent improvement of the financial leverage along with the reduction in interest expenses. Consistent payoffs along with strategically divested assets improved the operating leverage and led to an operating cash flow of $3.95 billion in the first nine months of 2013, which surged from $3.68 billion in 2012 and an outflow of $81 million in 2011. Moreover, reduction in debt by $6.27 billion in the first nine months of 2013 from 2012-end level, through its liability management initiatives, helped improve debt-to-capital ratio to 17.6% at the end of Sep 2013 from 20.5% at 2012-end and about 31% at 2010-end. The redemption of notes worth $500 million in Sep 2013 will further improve the financial leverage. At the end of Sep 2013, AIG s DIB had excess liquidity worth $2.9 billion, while majority of DIB s debt is scheduled to mature in the next 5 years, thereby enhancing capital flexibility and buoyancy for long-term growth. Going ahead...

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

International Group Analysis

...Team B American International Group (AIG) Analysis Mario Diaz MGT/521 September 22, 2014 Dr. Deb Lawton University of Phoenix Team B American International Group (AIG) Analysis Divisional structure efficiency review. Due to several changes within the company and with personnel, the current structure of our team has become inefficient in matters of operational needs and organizational direction. A proposal to make some changes at our divisional level has been recommended and the organizational structure within this division will be revamped in order to meet with current company goals as well as industry and consumer needs. Why is restructure needed? As it has become widely known, the Government bailout program which AIG was a recipient of an $82 billion loan, has had a significant effect on consumer confidence in our company. Top that with ill-advised bonus packages being provided to AIG executives and partners, really put AIG in the targets of consumer watchdogs and government committees. This was a low-time for AIG and since then we have made changes for the better and started to gain both consumer and government confidence in the direction that AIG has begun to take. AIG has begun to gain consumer confidence as it has again become a global leader in the insurance industry. This is evident because according to American International Group (2014), AIG generated, “$67,497,000,000 as of the end of calendar year 2013, and currently it has approximately 64,000...

Words: 881 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Aig Bailout

...Can We Expect A Regulated CDS Market? Derivatives Project Xilin Yang (Celine) Introduction The article introduces credit default swaps and explores the problems of the credit derivatives. By analyzing the AIG’s bailout, the article describes the regulation gap in the CDS market and states the regulation reform after the crisis. Part I is background, generally introduces the Wall Street crisis. How it happened? What consequence it has? Part II is mainly about AIG’s CDS business: how AIG got involved in the crisis and why the biggest world insurance company suddenly collapsed. Part III is about credit default swaps: definition, construction, and problems. Part IV is concerned on the regulation reform after AIG’s failure. Wall Street Crisis Speaking of the Wall Street crisis, people all know it proceed from subprime crisis. The relatively low interest rate prompts banks to issue large amount of housing loans. To transfer default risk embedded in those loans, investment banks package those loans and mortgages into student loans, car loans and credit card debt, which form the so-called collateralized debt obligation (CDOs). All these derivatives depend on the housing loans. In the era of low interest rates, house prices rise rapidly and promote the rapid development of the housing loans business. With steady stream of housing loans into financial derivatives products, different ranks of products are packaged to sale out. The good view of economy makes those potentially risky...

Words: 2738 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

A Summary of the Case “Coping with Financial and Ethical Risks at American International Group (Aig)”

...Financial and ethical Risks at American International Group (AIG)” Background          American International Group, Inc. is a company whose operation began back in 1919. It was established back then by Cornelius Vander Starr as an insurance agency in Shanghai, China. AIG left china in 1949 after Starr had established himself as the westerner the sell insurance to the Chinese people. AIG headquarters then shifted from china to New York City, which is still the headquarters up to date. It is from here that AIG began its expansion tapping into other markets such as the Latin America, Asia, Middle East and Europe through use of its subsidiaries.          AIG – Causes of its demise The start of problems facing AIG began during the tenure of Greenberg as AIGs' CEO. It was during tenure that the company expanded from its initial line of insurance into other many complex lines of business and insuring risks that only a few other companies would consider handling. This led to the involvement of the company in businesses that it did not fully comprehend. AIG started investing in many different types of securities which included mortgage backed securities and also credit derivatives trading. AIG then went ahead to become a leading player in these markets, insuring other company's debt obligations against losses due to its excellent credit rating at the time.          It was AIG's Financial Product Unit (AIGFP) that brought about the fall of the company, due to its disastrous credit swaps product...

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Meralco

...ankruptcy For AIG? 4 0 0 1 0 WASHINGTON, D.C.–Earlier this week, Texas Republican Jeb Hensarling and California Democrat Brad Sherman–who rarely find themselves on the same side of an issue–both suggested putting failed and shamed insurer American International Group into a “receivership,” a process that the government uses to unwind failed banks. Sherman says that he’s floated the idea to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. (A Treasury spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.) Wednesday, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair, all but echoed these suggestions, telling a Senate panel that for companies that are too big to fail, there should be “a legal mechanism for the orderly resolution of these institutions similar to that which exists for FDIC insured banks.” In other words, a receivership. Given the $170 billion into AIG , and the explosion of anger over the company’s payout of $165 million in bonuses, it’s no shock the idea is being explored as a way of washing the public’s hands of the messy and troublesome firm. Could it work? Yes, but there are risks. The FDIC acts as a “receiver” for failed banks all the time, taking them over and selling assets to satisfy creditors’ claims. There’s currently no mechanism for placing a non-bank holding company like AIG into a receivership, so Congress would have to create this authority. The problem is AIG’s debt. In a receivership, debt contracts are usually kept in place. Without...

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Credit Crisis

...title of “The Dominoes Fall: a timeline of the squeeze and crunch”. I include below the December preamble. The version of mid-May, 2009, will appear as the editorial of the June 2009 issue of the AJM, under the title “Anatomy of a Credit Crisis.” I include below the June preamble, in which I assay a framework for understanding the genesis of the crisis. December, 2008: IN ITS LEADER of October 13, 2008, the Financial Times characterized the western world’s banking system as suffering “the equivalent of a cardiac arrest.” The collapse of confidence in the system means that “it is now virtually impossible for any institution to finance itself in the markets longer than overnight.” This occurred less than a month after Lehman Brothers (LB) collapsed, without bailout. Six months earlier Bear Stearns (BS) had been bailed out after JP Morgan Chase (JPM Chase) had bought it for $10 a share, at the regulator’s urging. After LB fell, who would be next? And if LB, who was not at risk? Despite the earlier U.S. government bailouts of the erstwhile government mortgage originators (and still seen as government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs), the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the later bailout of the world’s largest insurer, American International Group (AIG), everything changed with the demise of LB. The FT was describing the freezing of the interbank credit market. After LB’s fall, so-called counterparty...

Words: 14558 - Pages: 59