Premium Essay

Federal Prosecution In Federal Courts

Submitted By
Words 376
Pages 2
Federal prosecution is in federal court, under federal law, which is conducted by the U.S Department of Justice; the federal government employs the judge and prosecutor. The justice department also represents the US government in all legal matters and at times it provides legal advice to agencies. This system is built by a combination of both, civil service officials and appointed politicians. In federal prosecution, there are three important entities; the solicitor general, the criminal division, and U.S. attorneys. The U.S Solicitor General is the third highest ranking in the justice system. Their task is to represent the executive branch, as well as supervise and conduct government litigation in the U.S Supreme Court. With respect to the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Cja 423 Week 2 Assignment Race and Ethnicity Juvenile Offenders Outline and Reference

...com/contact-us/ ) Feel Free to Search your Class through Our Product Categories or From Our Search Bar (http://hwguiders.com/ ) I. Introduction II. Juvenile Offenders A. The Federal Bureau of Investigation B. Race and Ethnicity Overview C. Juvenile Justice Process 1. Arrest 2. Detention, 3. Prosecution, 4. Adjudication, 5. Transfer to adult court III. Data A. Differential rates of arrest for crime are related to race. 1. Violent crimes 2. Robbery TO Download Complete Tutorial Hit Purchase Button CJA 423 week 2 Assignment Race and Ethnicity Juvenile Offenders Outline and Reference Get Tutorial by Clicking on the link below or Copy Paste Link in Your Browser https://hwguiders.com/downloads/cja-423-week-2-assignment-race-ethnicity-juvenile-offenders-outline-reference/ For More Courses and Exams use this form ( http://hwguiders.com/contact-us/ ) Feel Free to Search your Class through Our Product Categories or From Our Search Bar (http://hwguiders.com/ ) I. Introduction II. Juvenile Offenders A. The Federal Bureau of Investigation B. Race and Ethnicity Overview C. Juvenile Justice Process 1. Arrest 2. Detention, 3. Prosecution, 4. Adjudication, 5. Transfer to adult court III. Data A. Differential rates of arrest for crime are related to race. 1. Violent crimes 2. Robbery TO Download Complete Tutorial Hit Purchase Button CJA 423 week...

Words: 2112 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Processing a Defendant Crjs Unit 4 Group Project Portion

...Processing a Defendant: In A Federal Investigation. Unit 4 Corrections and Prisons July 7th, 2013 AIU ONLOINE PROFESSOR: TINA DINGLE Abstract Today we will be discussing how a defendant is processed through a federal case. This is exceptionally important because your actions or absence of actions as law enforcement during the detaining of these suspects can result in the difference between their prosecution and release under federal statue. This presentation will also act as a checklist as well as provide additional information that you may need while in the field or throughout the proceedings of this case. Understand that your participation in this case may not be limited to just arresting or the processing of evidence; you may be utilized as a witness, under oath, in front of a federal court of law. Federal Investigation Outline Format for Presentation Process 1.0 Investigation 1.1 Evidence: It is evidence that leads the prosecutor to believe he has a "Strong case", meaning there is strong evidence that the person or persons have committed the crime. Direct evidence would include a witness who saw the crime happen, video/audio tape of the crime, and statements done by witnesses, of the crime. Circumstantial evidence may come from someone who did not see the crime first-hand; it includes someone's feelings on multiple indicators in the theory of the crime, even though that person did not see the crime take place (Journalists Guide, 2011). 1.2 Decision to...

Words: 4648 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Criminal Justice

...Myia M. Hardy CJA/204 Introduction to Criminal Justice Instructor: Ron Furtado November 1, 2011 The criminal justice system is a set of legal and social institutions for enforcing the criminal law in accordance with a defined set of procedural rules and limitations. In the United States, there are separate federal, state, and military criminal justice systems; each state has separate systems for adults and juveniles. Criminal justice systems include several major subsystems, composed of one or more public institutions and their staffs: police and other law enforcement agencies; trial and appellate courts; prosecution and public defender offices; probation and parole agencies; custodial institutions ( jails, prisons, reformatories, halfway houses, etc.); and departments of corrections (responsible for some or all probation, parole, and custodial functions). Some jurisdictions also have a sentencing guidelines commission. Other important public and private actors in this system include: defendants; private defense attorneys; bail bondsmen; other private agencies providing assistance, supervision, or treatment of offenders; and victims and groups or officials representing or assisting them (e.g., crime victim compensation boards). In addition, there are numerous administrative agencies whose work includes criminal law enforcement (e.g., driver and vehicle licensing bureaus; agencies dealing with natural resources and taxation). Legislators and other elected officials...

Words: 1370 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Unit 1 Ip

...several different components that work on different levels of duty. This paper would describe the different parts of this much needed system such as law enforcement, attorneys of prosecution duties, defense advocates or counsels, Magistrates or judges on three different levels of government, federal, state, and local. Also, this paper would confer the two different structures of the system of the criminal courts. Last, it would give the stages of interactions of the prosecutorial and investigative process with a lawbreaker defendant. Officers: Law Enforcement There are different kinds of agents of law enforcement in the federal level of government. The FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Marshall, USSS, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, and Drugs Enforcement Agency are support staffs and special agents of the federal government. They protect the White House, the President and his family, Vice President, the White House. Also, there are some agencies including the IRS, Bureau of Indian Affairs that assist these law agencies on suspicious activities. They can implement on both levels, federal and state (Ekman, 2013). On the state level, there are sheriffs, state troopers and state police officials, and deputies. They patrol state routes and sometimes federal areas. They patrol the highways for traffic violations and civil and/or criminal laws. There are drug task forces, state parks law enforcement agencies, and attorney general. The...

Words: 1118 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Processing a Defendant

...Unit 4 Corrections and Prisons August 12, 2012 Abstract Today we will be discussing how a defendant is processed through a federal case. This is exceptionally important because your actions or absence of actions as law enforcement during the detaining of these suspects can result in the difference between their prosecution or release under federal statue. This presentation will also act as a checklist as well as provide additional information that you may need while in the field or throughout the proceedings of this case. Understand that your participation in this case may not be limited to just arresting or the processing of evidence; you may be utilized as a witness, under oath, in front of a federal court of law. Federal Investigation Outline Format for Presentation Process 1.0 Investigation 1.1 Evidence: - It is evidence that leads the prosecutor to believe he has a "Strong case", meaning there is strong evidence that the person or persons have committed the crime. Direct evidence would include a witness who saw the crime happen, video/audio tape of the crime, and statements done by witnesses, of the crime. Circumstantial evidence may come from someone who did not see the crime first-hand; it includes someone's feelings on multiple indicators in the theory of the crime, even though that person did not see the crime take place. 1.2 Decision to Charge: Prosecutors study all information provided by the investigators, and at...

Words: 4401 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

State Courts: State Vs. Federal Judiciary

... State vs Federal Judiciary Judiciary is one of three branches of government; the other two are the Executive and Legislative branches. The purpose of judiciary is to interpret and protect the law. Judiciary acts like a guardian for our Constitution in our court system. Within the boundaries of each state and coexisting with state courts are numerous federal district and appellate courts that function independently. It may seem overwhelming and baffling to consider what legal matter may be decided in which forum. But for the most part, federal and state courts have their own separate purpose and part in applying the laws before it and administering justice to all. Federal Judiciary The...

Words: 1139 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Paper

...points that are the more important in your view on properly processing a defendant in a federal investigation. •A 1-page outline on the best way to format and present the federal criminal pretrial process, which includes jury selection, evidence and jury instructions. Please provide examples in your outline of your recommended format for presenting the process. •A 1-page draft of how to present the processing requirements and the mandated pretrial measures required by law While many citizens think the real action in the criminal courts happens during trials, they are wrong in that assessment. Ninety percent of criminal cases are disposed of by guilty pleas rather than trials. Most of those guilty pleas are the result of agreements between prosecutors and defense attorneys. Plea bargaining is a process in which a prosecutor makes a concession to a defendant (for example, reducing charges or recommending a lighter sentence) in exchange for the defendant's pleading guilty. Even cases that go to trial are sometimes decided before the trial begins. Some experts think that the O.J. Simpson case, for example, was won outside the courtroom through early forensic work by experts and through a legal strategy that forced the prosecution to present its evidence at a preliminary hearing rather than a grand jury proceeding. In the landmark case Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantees access to qualified counsel, which is fundamental...

Words: 3297 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

A Second Bite of the Apple

...double jeopardy purposes. In applying the doctrine, the crucial determination is whether the two entities that seek successively to prosecute a defendant for the same course of conduct can be termed separate sovereigns. This determination turns on whether the prosecuting entities’ powers to undertake criminal prosecutions derive from separate and independent sources. It has been uniformly held that the states are separate sovereigns with respect to the federal government because each states’ power to prosecute derives from its inherent sovereignty, preserved to it by the Tenth Amendment, and not from the federal government. Give the distinct sources of their powers to try a defendant, the states are no less sovereign with respect to each other than they ae with respect to the Federal Government.” (Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 (1985) Pp. 437 -439) A Second Bite of the Apple Double jeopardy clause prevents the government from prosecuting a person accused of a crime more than once for the same offense. To bar from retrying the accused if the prior prosecution had progressed to the point in which jeopardy had attached; if it involved the same offenses; and if both prosecutions where brought by the same governing entity. (Kanovitz, J. (2015) pg. 474) I If double jeopardy was as straight forward as it appears there wouldn’t be a vast load of case law arguing whether it had been violated by the government. There are two sources of difficulty that applies to double jeopardy, first...

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Mapp V. Case Brief Summary

...The facts supported the issue and was accepted by all courts that officers did obtained evidence by unlawful search and seizure. The officers came there in pursuit of information that a person wanted for questing regarding a connection with recent bombing was hiding in the house and there were large amount of paraphernalia being hidden in house. The petitioner requested for a search warrant, officer at the time had no search warrant. Officers waited for backup for about three hours and knocked on the door. Upon failure to open the door on time officers forcefully entered the house and showed alleged search warrant. But the Ohio Supreme Court said even if the evidence was acquired illegally it does not prevent them from using it on trail, citing Wolf v. Colorado in which court hold that, if a person is prosecuted for a State crime in a State court, the Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent use of evidence obtained illegally. The petitioner than appealed in Supreme Court of United States for evidence acquired in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be used in State court proceedings. Judgement: The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decision of Ohio Supreme Court and ruled in favor of the petitioner by 5-3 votes. The court...

Words: 850 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Components of the Criminal Justice System

...and Federal Governments in an effort to control crime and inflict penalties on individuals who break the laws. A single universal criminal justice system does not exist in the United States. What we do have are many similar, individual systems. The criminal justice system works differently in each area depending on the jurisdiction that is in charge. These systems vary from city, county, state, federal or tribal government or military installation. The different jurisdictions have various laws, agencies, and processes of managing criminal justice procedures. The main systems are comprised of the State system and the Federal System. The state system is responsible for handling crimes committed within their state borders. The Federal System is responsible for handling crimes committed on federal property or occurring in more than one state. Most criminal justice systems are made up of three major components being Law enforcement, the courts and Corrections. They also have two other components being Prosecution and Defense Attorneys. The first major component and the front line defense against criminal activity is Law Enforcement. Law enforcement officials are responsible for recording reports on crimes that happen within their jurisdiction. Investigators review data from crimes and gather evidence. Street level officers are responsible for physically arresting offenders, giving testimony about the information collected through the course of the arrest during the court procedures...

Words: 1235 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ethics Work

... * * * Pretrial process is when the prosecution and the lawyer provide all the evidence that will presented in the case. This would be a list of all the witnesses that will be call by either party or from one party. Both the prosecution and lawyer also have the chance to motion for the use of a way of referencing something that they think might help the case. * * * * * * A pretrial conference is a meeting of the parties to a case conducted prior to trial. The conference is held before the trial judge or a magistrate, a judicial officer who possesses fewer judicial powers than a judge. [ A pretrial conference may be held prior to trial in both civil and criminal cases. A pretrial conference may be requested by a party to a case, or it may be ordered by the court. Generally, the term pretrial conference is used interchangeably with the term pretrial hearing.Pretrial conferences are conducted in criminal cases to decide matters that do not inquire into the defendant's guilt or innocence. Under rule 17.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, pretrial conferences for criminal cases may be conducted to promote a fair and expeditious trial. In practice, federal and state courts use the pretrial conference in criminal cases to decide such preliminary matters as what evidence will be excluded from trial and what witnesses will be allowed to testify. legal- * * * The court may set any criminal case for a pre-trial hearing before...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...heard footsteps leading towards his location so he stepped out from his hiding spot and shot Samuel’s. While Cheever was walking back towards his hiding spot he shot Samuel’s once again. He made the decision to also shoot a deputy, a detective, and members of the local SWAT team which had also arrived. However only Samuel’s was shot (Westlaw, 2013). History Cheever was charged with Capital murder in Kansas. Soon after the Kansas Supreme Court determined that the state’s death penalty scheme was unconstitutional. The prosecutor’s chose to dismiss their charges to allow the federal authorities to prosecute him utilizing the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C 3591 et esq (Westlaw, 2013). Within the federal case, Cheever filed notice where he intended to allow expert evidence which indicated that his methamphetamine intoxication negated him to have specific intent. The Federal District Court then ordered Cheever to submit to a psychiatric evaluation. Seven days into the federal trial the case was dismissed and the Kansas Supreme Court...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Court History and Purpose

...Court History and Purpose CJA/224 July 28, 2012 Court History and Purpose This paper will cover topics such as; what a court is and what the purpose of the court is. This paper will define the dual court system. In addition this paper will describe the role that early legal codes, the common law and the precedent played in the development of courts. And lastly this paper will identify the role of the courts in the criminal justice system today. The courts are a part of the judicial branch in the three branches of government. This means that in this branch the laws are interpreted. Like the other two branches, it works to keep the criminal justice system running as smoothly as possible. The laws are make in the legislative branch and is enforced in the executive branch. The police are a part of the executive branch. So when some one breaks a law, the job of the police, executive branch, is to arrest or ticked said offender. After an arrest or a citation or ticket is made, the next step is the court proceedings. In a case that an arrest is made, the offender is brought in front of a judge and bail is set. After that, if need be, the case is brought to prosecution. If the prosecution takes that case, then the case is put on trial. This is important because it shows just what the judicial part of government and the court part of the criminal justice system does, and why it is important. So the court systems job is to interpret the law and bring justice...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Easr

...victim 2. Which U.S sumpre court case forced the prosecution must disclose any evidence that the defense request. U.S V. bagley 3. Which work group member has the responsibility of demonstrating to a jury that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? The prosecutor 4.The role of the defense attorney includes all except? Which one of the following. D: representing the state 5:Which U.S supreme court case established the right of counsel for indigent defendants in federal court proceedings? Johnson V. Zerbst. 6. Which U.S supreme court case established the right to counsel for indigent defendants in state felony court . Gideon V. Wainwright 7. Which U.S supreme court case established the right to counsel for juvenile defendants? In re gault 8. The most widely used system in indigent defense is. public defender program 9. List the order of the steps in criminal trial . 1. Opening statement by prosecutor? Plaintiff 2. Opeing statement by defense 3. Direct examination by prosecutor/ plaintiff. 4..Cross- examination by defense 5. Motions 6..Direct examination by defense 7.Cross examination by plaintiff/prosecutor 8. Closing statement by plaintiff/prosecutor 9. Closing statement by defense 10. Rebuttal argument 11. Jury instructions 12. Verdict 10: The federal speedy trial act allows for the dismissal of charges when the prosecution does not seek indictment with...

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Crime to Corrections

...presented outside a federal courthouse to the public after a recent round up of local gang members by federal, state and local authorities. Included in the brief will be information on the process by which the suspects were taken into custody, booked and all information recorded. We will also give a detailed, step by step overview of the federal justice system as it pertains to the defendants as they work their way through the legal system. Our brief will conclude with the corrections process as it applies to a federal case. The brief is intended to make the public aware of how law enforcement, the judicial system, and corrections all work together to try to make the process through the legal system as smooth as possible to maintain due process while upholding the law.   Welcome, I understand this is a difficult and confusing time for you if you are here because of the recent arrests that occurred. I am going to explain in detail to you the steps that will be taken as each suspect is processed through the jail. I will then discuss the pretrial measures as required by law to protect the defendant as well as the victims in this case. Finally, I will discuss pretrial steps as well as what will occur should a federal trial take place for the defendant. Please hold any questions till the end of my briefing so we can get through all the information as there is a lot of it. First, let me discuss the arrest. This morning, at approximately 6:00a.m., Federal officers, with the support...

Words: 1858 - Pages: 8