Free Essay

Fools Crow

In:

Submitted By colt45ice
Words 1060
Pages 5
All is Lost In Fools Crow, by James Welch, Welch shows that everything can be lost through betrayal, the loss of a center, and no trust. This is described in the text of Fools Crow, by the story told by Mad Plume of the Black Patched Moccasins. Mad Plume tells Fools Crow, formally known as White Mans Dog, about their past and their downfall. Betrayal is the start to something that can destroy everything that a tribe once was. Little Dog was once the chief of the Black Patched Moccasins. “Many of us were surprised, but Little Dog told us a good trick, for soon good things to eat would grow. The white chiefs wished us to quit the trail of the blackhorns and to grow the good things to feed upon.” (97). Little Dog tried to live in peace with the Napikwans. So he and his people tried to live like the Napikwans. The thing though is that they were always hungry now because they were not getting the nutrients they once got, so they started hunting the blackhorns again. This angered the Napikwans. So Little Dog had to try other ways to please them. All he wanted was peace among them and his people. He feared the Napikwans so he threatened his people “He told our people not to kill anymore of them. He told the seizer chiefs that he would deal harshly with those Pikunis that offended them. He wanted peace between the Pikunis and the Napikwans, and that would be his downfall.” (97). He did not want his people to offend the Napikwans in anyway to give them a reason to bring harm to them. The negative to this though is that Little Dog’s people saw it as him taking the Napikwans side. Therefore his people turned on him and killed him “The killers of Little Dog felt the head chief had put the interest of the Napikwans before those of the Pikunis. It was he who betrayed the people.” (98). Everything he did was only to protect his people or prolong his people from an inescapable fate. He saw something that the rest of his tribe did not. All they did after all the efforts he did to keep them safe was betray him. Betrayal is the beginning of the end. Little Dog was more than just a chief to these people he provided a center. He wanted to protect his people from a threat that was far greater than they could understand “He knew the Napikwans possessed greater medicine than the Pikunis, for they came from that place where the Sun Chief rises to begin his journey.” (97). He did so much for his people to try to keep them safe he lost sight of being as a part of his own people. They tried to live like the Napikwans and traditions were being lost. The center was starting to fade even before the betrayal. “We are a leaderless people now.” (98). Betrayal was the cause of the loss of the center and everything began to crumble. Without a leader the people lose care for one another and they go into anarchy. The young men had left to fend for themselves “No, they are off hunting for themselves, or drunk with the white man’s water, or stealing their horses.” (98). Without a center there is no law or tradition that really matters anymore. There is no one there with honor because of the betrayal of their own people. The center is the bond; it is what keeps the people in unity. A center can be many things in this case it was one man with a hope “There is no center here.” (98). Now that there is no longer a center, the people have made their new center in themselves “They do not bring anything back to their people.” (98). They do not see the threats in their world and all they are doing is taking their own people down too by being selfish. Without a center trust and respect is tense. The people convey the betrayal of Little Dog with the loss of trust. They no longer respected him once he started trying to live like the Napikwans. Once Little Dog was betrayed and the center was lost, all trust was lost among the Black Patched Moccasins “He was betrayed by some of his own people, and that is why the Black Patched Moccasins have become so distrustful.” (97). They cannot even trust their own to provide for each other because there is no longer anything to keep them united. Trust and respect is what gives people hope, but they have abandoned all of that. They do not feel as if they would be welcome anywhere else to get away from the Napikwans, because they feel as if they did this to themselves. It was much more than that though. They were once so highly respected and it all got ripped away because their own people did not just have some hope or trust in the center of their tribe. They had given up in a way because everything these people had worked for their whole lives was just taken away in matter of seconds. Now they were poor and had nothing really. “Perhaps – it would be nice.” (98). This is what Mad Plume says to Fools Crow and that was the end of the conversation. They did not want to be taken care of if their own people are not willing to take care of them. They wanted some honor and respect in trying to be independent and salvage what was left of the center they still had among the tribe. Even though they had lost everything they still offered Fools Crow to feast with them. I feel like they do this to try and cover up all their hurt and show something in themselves that they did not really have. They hold on to a false hope for all their trust was lost. In conclusion, even great things can crumble. The Black Patched Moccasins have been through hell, but yet they seek out respect and try to have hope. They show no importance to Fools Crow at a glance, but they are the moral of how easy these people could fall if they did not work together and have leadership.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Fools Crow Essay

...Madison Liechty AP English 3 Pohl Period 6 23 July 2014 Characterization of Fools Crow When writing, authors use different techniques to give the characters specific qualities. One method an author can use is characterization, which is the information the author gives to the reader about the characters such as physical appearance, feelings or dreams the character has, and what others say or how they react to the character. In the novel Fools Crow, James Welch uses characterization to enhance the personality of White Man’s Dog, and the story follows this eighteen year-old boy through his life as a Blackfoot Indian living in western Montana. Welch creates different situations for White Man’s Dog to show how he develops throughout the story. The story opens and White Man’s Dog is described as an unlucky and unsuccessful boy with nothing to show for his eighteen years. He is not only unsuccessful when it comes to hunting, but he has also never touched a woman’s body, creating the opportunity for his friends make fun of him and call him dog-lover (Welch 4). Even though White Man’s Dog is unsuccessful and overshadowed by his younger brother and his friends, an old war leader, Yellow Kidney, sees potential in White Man’s Dog. As the omniscient narrator looks into Yellow Kindey’s thoughts, White Man’s Dog stands out because although he is inexperienced in the manner of war, he already possesses qualities that are scarce among other men his age (Welch 20). After returning from Yellow...

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Fools Crow Journey To Self-Discovery Analysis

...Kiyara McCue Mrs. McConnell English 12 24 October 2016 Fools Crow Journey to Self-Discovery As the book opens, eighteen-year-old White Man’s Dog dreams of becoming a wealthy and respected warrior. His friends tease him because he has never been with a woman, and he is troubled by his desire for his father’s third wife, Kills-close-to-the-lake. When his friend, Fast Horse, announces that Yellow Kidney is planning a horse raiding party against the Crows, White Man’s Dog sees the raid as an opportunity to acquire horses and respect. Two years previously, he had gone to seek his animal helper, but receive ‘no song, no vision’. He sees himself, and is seen by the rest of his tribe, as being ‘without luck’ (p7). Though White Man’s Dog is eager to join the party, he admits to Fast Horse that he is afraid. He is reassured, however, by the offer of the Pikuni medicine man, Mik-api, to perform a ceremony which will make him brave. Though he is wary that White Man’s Dog’s poor luck might infect the rest of the raiding party, Yellow Kidney agrees to take the boy along out of respect for his father, Rides-at-the-door....

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Lear Learns to See Better

...in front of us. Before diving into the details of words and imagery let’s have a look at key synopsis and events in the play related to our theme: * 1.1.130 Lear uses flattery test to divide his kingdom (shortsightedness) * 1.1.161 Overtaken by anger Lear says “out of my sight” to Cordelia his favorite daughter (anger) * 1.1.16 Lear banishes loyal Kent for his honesty (anger) * 1.4.9 Lear does not recognize Kent in disguise and employs him again (shortsightedness) * 1.4.200 Lear asks “Where are his eyes?” (confusion) * 1.4.204 “Lear’s shadow” is fool’s answer to Lear question about how he is (fool wise words) * 1.5.20-21 “To keep one’s eyes of either side’s nose, that what a man cannot smell out he may spy into” (Fool wise word) * 1.5.36-37 “If thou wert my fool, nuncle, I’d have thee beaten for being old before your time.” (Fool) * 3.2.1-13 “Blow winds and crack your cheeks! Rage, blow, You cataracts and hurricanoes, spout Till you have drenched our steeples, drowned the cocks! You sulphorous and thought-executing fires, Vaunt-couriers of oak-cleaving thunderbolts, Singe my white head! And thou, all-shaking thunder, Strike flat the think rotundity o’th’world! Crack nature’s moulds, all germens spill at once That makes ingrateful man!” (rage) * 3.2.14-24 “Rumble they bellyful! Spit fire! Spout rain! Nor rain, wind, thunder, fire, are my daughters. I tax not you,...

Words: 2683 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

King Lear

...Literature 10/30/14 Who’s the fool? King Lear is a story about an old king that, before retiring, splits his in half and gives it to his two older daughters. This turns out to be a bad decision due to the fact that neither of those daughters seems to like him. Along this road there are people that help him get through this ordeal. One of these people is known throughout the play as the fool, but is the fool really a fool or is he something greater? The fool doesn’t change the way he acts towards Lear during the course of the play. In most plays, books, movies, etc. the court jester, clown, or joker (except batman) have a very small part in terms of the main plot. In those same places; however, these people represent something that the main character is trying to defeat or lacks. In this play the fool signifies the thing that King Lear doesn’t have. He embodies King Leers’ ability to not see the truth. In most scenes that he appears, the fool hits Lear with a line or a little speech in which the fool tries make Lear see the light. This process does take a little while before Lear picks up on a few, very clear, hints. When reading King Lear one can’t help notice that the fools’ casual lines are actually intelligent and thoughtful, and not random stupidity. The king questions one of his knights “But where’s my fool? I have not seen him this two days.” This might be the last time that King Lear is thinking clearly. Maybe if the fool was present at the beginning of...

Words: 1441 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

A Worthy Fool

...Aaron Cornelius Pledge English III Mrs. Brown December 7, 2013 A Worthy Fool In many of his plays, Shakespeare is able to use characters in a very exciting way. Certain characters are able to transform the entire play in a special way. For Romeo and Juliet, there is Friar Lawrence, Julius Caesar there is Casca, and for As You Like It there is Touchstone. Even though these characters may not be the focus of the play, they do have an indiscrete purpose and serve what turns out to be a paramount role. In the play As You Like It, Shakespeare creates the character Touchstone and uses his quick wit and playful attitude to add an additional amount of comedy. Everything about him is fairly entertaining, from his clothing to his personality and even his name. A touchstone is actually used to test the purity of metals. When scrapping gold against touchstone, it will leave a line of dust that someone can use to show how untainted it is. Much like the stone touchstone, Touchstone has the skill to expose human beings by using his wittiness to scratch their surface. This is really shown when he argues with William and Corin. When attempting to scratch the surface of Corin, Corin comes out unscathed. “Will thou rest damned? God help thee, shallow man. God make incision in; thou art raw.”(iii.2.70-72). Corin is able to counter the remarks of Touchstone. In this situation Corin shows to be a true gold. He does not back down, but counters him. The conversation between Touchstone...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Cruelty In Shakespeare's King Lear

...Lear demonstrated the cruelty of heart and attacked the sense of humanity. Further, in the Elizabethan times fools’ profession was to entertain the king and others. Not to mention, King Lear was an aged king who divided his kingdom between his daughters and he foolishly committed misjudgment that ended with a tragedy by disowning his daughter Cordelia. However, the fool’s role was the most insightful role in the play and he was the only person who was allowed to criticize the king. Moreover, the fool appeared and disappeared many time in the plays and his appearance and disappearance affected the king’s decisions. Also, the fool and Cordelia represented the truth in King Lear’s life and they were not seen in the same acts...

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

King Lear

...The True Nature of Lear’s Madness Out of all of Shakespeare’s works, King Lear is by far his greatest tragedy. Tragedy, not in the sorts of horrific blood shed, but in terms of the hostile nature of humankind, that was thoroughly explored within the play. The brilliance of the play does not only lie in its brilliant storyline, it ultimately lies in the numerous universal, yet controversial themes. Themes of familial obligation, metaphorical blindness, political disarray, cruelty, betrayal, insanity and madness, these are only a few of the many conveyed. The critical summation of King Lear is as such: King Lear, ruler of Britain, decides to abdicate his throne and leave Britain in the charge of his three daughters. However, due to his weakness to flattery he bestows the entire kingdom to his daughters, Goneril and Regan. Unlike her malevolent sisters, Cordelia is banished by Lear. Ultimately, as a result of the committed acts, Lear sets not only himself, but also his entire country into civil strife. The natural order originally established by Lear falls apart and disorder engulfs the realm. Lear’s, ‘fall from grace’ in addition to the abuse he attains from his offspring causes him to go temporarily insane. However, insanity leads Lear to self-realization, completely stripped from his royal pretensions. Such a realization causes Lear to overlook his values and finally learn of humility. One is able to state that before the climax took place Lear, in fact was ‘mad’, this...

Words: 1117 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The King

...Metamorphosis of King Lear Through the course of the play, King Lear goes through a process of attaining self-knowledge. With this knowledge, he goes through a metamorphosis of person, much like a caterpillar's change into a butterfly. In the beginning, King Lear's vanity, and the image and exercise of power dominate his person. But a series of losses (based on his own bad decisions), a wise "fool", a powerful storm, a seemingly crazy man, and the death of one who truly loved him clear his vision and allow him to see himself and the world as they truly are. The pain and suffering endured by Lear eventually tears down his strength and sanity. Lear is not as strong, arrogant, and filled with pride as he seems in the beginning of the play. Instead he a is weak, scared and confused old man. At the end of the play Lear has completely lost his sanity with the loss of his daughter, Cordelia and this is the breaking point that leads Lear to his death. In the beginning, King Lear shows his need for praise is how he chooses to divide his kingdom among his daughters. The one who praises him with the most "love" shall receive the largest area of land. This is even more evident when considering that Lear already has divided up the kingdom before the praising even begins, as he gives each daughter her land before hearing the next daughter's praise. Thus the entire arbitration is just a show and an ego boost to himself. It is because of his love for praise that makes him react so strongly...

Words: 1406 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

King Lear Essay

...Van Drine 1 Jonathan Van Drine ENG 4U1 Ms. S. Kavcic July 11th 2014 The Relationship that ended in Mortality When discovering the truths about human nature, society examines the relationships between humans. One of the strongest relationships that develop over time is the parent-child relationship. The bond between these two sets of people is so powerful and is rarely broken. Both people have duties and responsibilities that they carry out to help develop and nurture their relationship. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, he uses the family dynamic to analyze the relationship between King Lear and his two daughters, Regan and Goneril, to see if this bond exists. In a loving relationship, children respect and honor what their parents do for them. Shakespeare emphasizes on the compassion, blindness, betrayal and insanity that is present throughout the play. In every relationship there is always going to be a line of reasoning when both people do not see eye to eye on the same thing. However, there should always be someone in that relationship that shows the kindness and willingness to forgive. This is an act of compassion. When King Lear travels to Regan’s castle to live with her, he begins to realize that his two daughters are joining forces and inform him that they will not allow him to stay with each other unless he dismisses all of his attendants. When King Lear hears this, it ...

Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

King Lear

...KING LEAR Act One The play opens at Lear’s court, where we meet the main characters. The opening scene is in itself shocking, as Lear forces his daughters to declare their love for him. The one who loves him the most will receive the largest part of his kingdom, which he intends to divide between the three. Lear himself wishes to hand over the ruling of the kingdom to his daughters, while retaining the ‘Pre-eminence, and all the large effects / That troop with majesty’ (Scene 1, Lines 131-2). Goneril and Regan acquit themselves well at this love test. Cordelia, however, dismayed by her sisters’ ponderous words, refuses to take part in the ‘contest’ and tells Lear that she loves him as her duty instructs her. When Cordelia refuses to speak again, Lear casts her off without a moment’s hesitation. Ken attempts to argue with the King, accusing him of ‘hideous rashness’ (Scene 1, Line 151). When Kent further warns Lear that his elder daughters are false flatterers, Kent too is banished. Lear invests Albany and Cornwall with power, and, after Burgundy refuses to take Cordelia as his wife, now that she is without dowry, France takes her for her virtues alone. Goneril and Regan complain, in private, about Lear’s harsh judgement and unpredictable behaviour and worry that they too may be treated unfairly. Edmund, Gloucester’s bastard son, soliloquises about his own situation, revealing his devious intentions towards his brother. When his father enters, Edmund’s...

Words: 27223 - Pages: 109

Premium Essay

Shakespeare

...“King Lear”, a play written by Shakespeare is about a king from Britain who decides to step off the throne. He wants to divide his kingdom in three, and leave the pieces to his daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. He states that he will give the biggest piece to the daughter who can prove loves him most. Two of his daughters flatter him so dearly, and the other states that her true love for her father cannot be explained in words and she simply loves him with all her heart. The king is not happy with her words, so he banishes her from the castle and leaves her with nothing; however he unfortunately divides the pieces remaining to his two false daughters who have fed him with lies. While all this is going on Lear starts to realize the foolish mistakes he has been making and other families are having some similar issues. Many characters go through life altering events and finally see the plain truth at the end of the play, where it is in some cases too late to apologize for. They experience hardships, regrets, sorrow and grief. This play runs through many interlocking themes such as blindness, justice, and appearance and reality. The theme of blindness is ever so present in this play. For one, Cornwall and Regan poke out Gloucester’s eye because he helped Lear in a time of need. This physical act represents the symbolic nature of Lear and Gloucester’s great blindness. Both are blind to the falseness of their children. They praise the ones that are untrue to them, and believe...

Words: 1033 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Life and Song of Crow

...‘From the Life and Songs of the Crow’ by Ted Hughes God tries to teach Crow to say LOVE: ‘Crow gaped, and the white shark crashed into the sea’. (Crow’s First Lesson) Background – where did the idea for ‘Crow’ come from? In 1957 Ted Hughes met the American sculptor, engraver and publisher Leonard Baskin. Baskin was obsessed by corpses, and a variety of other things attended this obsession, including crows which he engraved with disturbingly anthropoid (human-like) characteristics. An invitation from Baskin to Hughes to write a few little poems to accompany his engravings was the cause of the first Crow poems. Crow: From the Life and Songs of the Crow was first published by Faber in 1972. The poems included in Crow are part of a large number of poems which make up a ‘vast folk epic’ which tells the story of Crow. Hughes’s account of the creation of the figure of Crow is thus: God, having created the world, has a recurring nightmare. A huge hand/ voice comes from deep space, takes him by the throat, half-throttles him, drags him through space, ploughs the earth with him then throws him back into heaven in a cold sweat. Meanwhile man sits at the gates of heaven waiting for God to grant him audience. He has come to ask God to take life back. God is furious and sends him packing. The nightmare seems to be independent of the creation, and God cannot understand it. The nightmare is full of mockery of the creation, especially of man. God challenges the nightmare to...

Words: 2287 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Is Gimple Truly A Fool?

...The word fool as defined by as “a person lacking in judgment or prudence” (webster dictionary). When considering this definition Gimple is truly a fool, he lacks what would be defined as “better judgment” and leads with belief in possibilities. Gimple was consistently falling for tricks and seeming to never learn from them. However despite the many tricks Gimple fell for, I would not count him a complete fool. Gimple might have lacked what we would call “better judgement”; but, he did not lack complete judgement. He was able to judge situations and see the dishonesty within them; he just decided to believe without evidence. It is this intentional decision made by Gimple to believe without evidence, in reaction to his peers and their cruelness,...

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Did Little Nimrod Killed Bird

...Little Nimrod killed C.C Robin because he had discovered the poaching secret that Little Nimrod was keeping. The first piece of evidence is that there were dead birds in the grass. This fact is important because C.C Robin is an ornithologist, or bird expert, and Little Nimrod is a poacher this proves that when C.C Robin was observing birds Nittle Nimod killed them. One of the birds that both little nimrod and C.C Robin had taken interest in was a bald eagle. These types of birds are endangered and Little Nimrod had just killed one. This started a fight between the two men.Another piece of evidence is the axe marks in the tree near the campsite.This detail is important because it implies that an axe was brought to the campsite by Bernie Burger...

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Crow: Film Analysis

...The Crow (1994) Director: Alex Proyas The Crow Analysis The film, The Crow, is a magnificent film that portrays an unhappy spirit who is on a vendetta to find and kill the criminals responsible for his and his fiancée, Shelly played by Sofia Shinas, death of Hollows Eve. The film takes place in city that is at a dismal state and one that is vulnerable to heinous crimes, such as the murder of Eric and Shelly. Murder is a big part of the film and is something that the director, Alex Proyas, wants to portray throughout the movie. I believe that Proyas wanted to show murder is a big issue in our society and that no one is safe, even people who are loving and harmless as Eric and Shelly were. When Eric says “Victims aren’t we all” right before he stabs Tin-Tin, explains how no one is safe from murder, whether you the good guy or the bad guy, it is almost a given. This film was filled with many symbols but the one that stood out the most was the crow. I believe that the crow symbolizes life’s mysteries; such as something which we cannot simply explain happens, we may just say that it was part of God’s plan or it was simply a twist of faith. Whatever the case may be, the crow was the reason Eric was resurrected and given a chance to get back those who ended his and Shelly’s lives. Not only does the crow show destiny but it also portrays life. For example when Eric was resurrected, he was virtually indestructible and nothing could harm him. But when the crow was wounded...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3