Free Essay

Fukuyama

In:

Submitted By amininaa
Words 2329
Pages 10
Francis Fukuyama. The end of the Cold War as the end of history.

Introduction.
The specifics of the international situation after the Cold War.
Since 1985, the world is going through an amazing evolution. The interdependence emerged and has become a reality of understanding of all processes in the world. Peace, freedom, human rights, social security, democracy have taken place of those values, because of which the major battles were unfold in the international arena and within countries. Overnight concepts collapsed that before seemed unshakable. In this case, not only the political picture of the world changed . At large numbers of people in different countries sense of global community, solidarity, public interest, human intimacy has been strengthened . Not surprisingly, that the rapid evolution of the global situation, the collapse of the bipolar system and fade into the background of ideological aspects confused scientists specializing in political predictions.
Now, it is necessary not only to explain the reasons which led to the formation of new political realities after the "cold war", but also suggest new approaches and concepts on the basis of which it was possible to trace the dynamics of international relations in a changing world.

Francis Fukuyama, his works and intepretations.
Francis Fukuyama - known American political scientist and geopolitician. He received a bachelor's degree from Cornell University (New York), then - PhD in political science from Harvard University.
"The End of History and the Last Man" is the first book of the American philosopher and political scientist Francis Fukuyama, was released in 1992 by publisher Free Press. It preceded the appearance of the book's publication in the journal The National Interest essay "The End of History?" (1989), which has received considerable attention in the press and scientific press. In his book "The End of History and the Last Man" Fukuyama continues the essay and argues that the spread in the world of Western-style liberal democracy indicates the end point of socio-cultural evolution of mankind and the formation of the final form of government. In the view of Fukuyama's end of history, however, does not mean the end of the event history, but it means the end of the century ideological confrontations, global wars and revolutions, and with it - the end of art and philosophy.
The book "The End of History and the Last Man," was subjected to abundant criticism in the scientific literature and in journalism. Most reviewers have pointed to the ideological bias of the author's extreme commitment to liberal democracy, the selectivity in the evaluation and selection of the events of the facts, as well as the underestimation of the importance of such movement has grown, openly opposing the spread of liberal democracy as Islamic fundamentalism.
Francis Fukuyama has taken an active part in the debate that raged after the release of the book, consistently defending his positions, but in subsequent works he gradually revised the previously stated views.
Fukuyama contemplates the Soviet Union and comes to the conclusion that the post-historical consciousness represented by the "new thinking" - the only possible future for the Soviet Union. Fukuyama writes: "The Soviet Union is on the crossroads: either it enters into the road, which is forty-five years ago chose Western Europe and which was followed by the majority of Asian countries, or, confident in its own uniqueness, stucks in place. The selection will be huge for us, because when you consider the territory and the military power of the Union, it will continue to absorb our attention, making it difficult to realize that we are already on the other side of the history. "
Challenge facing the world is to learn to settle conflicts that exist or will exist between different ideas in such ways as negotiation, mediation, counseling. In the world of social science today is one of the central points is a provision under which the social development involves not so much as confrontation, an irreconcilable clash of different ideas, cultures, values, but their mutual enrichment, dialogue and through that their harmonization. Thus, following Fukuyamas logic, if we talk about the end of history, it is rather the end of the history of war, violence, and it makes no sense to link the end of history with the victory of the liberal ideology.
Fukuyama concludes his article with words that the end of the story is sad, because that would not be an ideological struggle that requires courage, imagination and idealism - instead of all this - the economic calculation, the endless technical problems, environmental concerns, and the satisfaction of sophisticated queries of a consumer. In posthistorical period there is no art, no philosophy, there is a carefully guarded museum of human history.

Criticisms.
The controversy about the "end of history" began in 1989, before the publication of the book "The End of History and the Last Man", when its piece was published in "The National Interest". The majority understood the words on the achievement of mankind "end of history" literally (eg, Dwight Ueynmen article "Voyage Into the Digital Universe"). According to Ueynmen, Fukuyama idealizes the principles of liberal democracy and the free market and sees no opportunities for their development and improvement.
Critics have focused on the fact that Fukuyama is too one-sided assesses the situation, he did not see that in addition to the confrontation of East and West, there are other very good reasons for conflict, clash of nations and peoples, widening gap between the North and the South, the renaissance of religious fundamentalism, the revival of nationalist extremism, also it was pointed the fact that the defeat of the totalitarian 'communism' does not mean that the historical scene descended basic values of communism - the ideas of justice, equality and freedom.
Russian researchers expressed about Fukuyama as: for example, litterateur D.Zatonsky in "Postmodernism: The hypothesis" (magazine "Foreign Literature", 1996) critically examines the work of Fukuyama's "end of history", placing it in the context of postmodern culture. Moreover, in his opinion Fukuyama's work is nothing more than a literary consequence of the postwar period, and refers to the philosophical kind of literature.
Immediately after the release of the print book, "The End of History and the Last Man" has caused a huge wave of reviews and the response of publications, becoming one of the most influential works of the 90-ies of XX century.
'Francis Fukuyama came up with a theory and a catchy phrase that turned him into an intellectual rock star' - wrote journalist Sarah Baxter. - 'Article published in a small magazine in small editions, literally electrified the entire academic world. His reflections resulted in a book, which became a global best-seller'.
Hidekazu Kawai Japanese political scientists commented Fukuyamas work with two main words: "You misunderstand" .
"The tremendous interest in Fukuyama essay had both political and cultural reasons. The former is a "revolution" in Eastern Europe ... - wrote Hidekazu - The rapid replacement of Marxist-Leninist ideology of "new thinking" and even more rapid disintegration of the socialist camp was a shock, and for analysts not less than for ordinary, inexperienced in political forecasts citizens. That why it is so complecated to interpret and understand'.
In the book "The Ghosts of Marx" the French philosopher Jacques Derrida pointed out that Fukuyama declares an accomplished "the end of history" which has come with the victory of the liberal ideas of democracy, which does not have, in his view, equivalent alternatives, and at the same time openly ignores evidence that liberal democracy in its ideal form does not exist anywhere in the world , that is an achievement of the future or that it is much more likely unattainable ideal. Derrida writes: "As Fukuyama ignored then how to think in an event, it randomly oscillates between two incompatible ways of reasoning."
The article «Reflections on the End of History, Five Years Later» Fukuyama explained his position on this and related issues. He pointed out that critics often mixed empirical and nominative positions in his book. The proclamation of the "end of history" is nominative, but not empirical: it does not mean that the "end of history" - it is like that, that was the end of wars, famine, ethnic and religious conflicts, and the fact that in terms of ideas and theories are no more viable alternatives to liberal democracy. "The most conventional false interpretation of my argument is the assertion that the" end of history "is an empirical statement describing the current situation in the world - wrote an American political scientist. - These critics believe that I said that there will not be any war, poverty, conflict at all'.
Many researchers have noted that Fukuyama talks about the triumph of democracy and capitalism, while forgetting that they are not able to provide equal opportunities and equal rights for all citizens.
British historian Perry Anderson, one of the prominent representatives of Western Marxism, pointed to the fact that appealing to the idealistic legacy of Hegel, Fukuyama ignores Marx and historical materialism, and with them, the class struggle, which does not disappear in a capitalist society where the capitalists exploit workers. On the planet of the few capitalist prosperity is based on the misery of the majority. The difference between the U.S. and India - the standard of living higher than in the first 70 positions. This oligarchic capitalism that generates the nuclear standoff, which can not be kept in a small circle, the flow of emigration to developed countries, hunger, poverty, environmental destruction. Thus, according to Anderson, to talk about the "end of history" is not possible.

'The end of history' today.
After the events at the beginning of the XXI century, in particular the attacks of September 11, Fukuyama's theory was recognised as "outdated" and "naive." In the words of an article in the Times, «story renewed its motion, leaving Francis Fukuyama prophesied its end, trail in his tail." However, the new political realities were unable to convince the scientist. In his works he continued to defend former positions. For example, in an article written shortly after the September 11, Australian, he stated: "I believe that in the end I will stay right: modernity - a powerful freight train that does not go down the slope by recent events, anyhow painful and unprecedented they were. We remain at the end of the history, because there is only one system that continues to dominate world politics - the system of liberal-democratic. "
In his review of two books ("The End of History" and "America at a Crossroads"), published under the title "Two Fukuyama," the British political scientist Anatol Lieven wrote that as a thinker in the field of history, culture and social science Fukuyama stands out not only the sharpness and depth of thought, but often by the fact that Paul Berman in his review for the New York Times described as playfulness. He likes to toss in the air conflicting ideas and competing schools of thought and juggle them. And even if the result is often obtained a terrible mix-up, the very process of thinking of the author captivates and stimulates the imagination.

Conclusion.
Thus, the "end of history" Fukuyama brings to an end of ideology, before fighting for the political and social domination. The end of ideology coincides with the end of the confrontation systems. Inherent in liberal democracy form of government and specifically to the fundamental principle of law it is final and not subject to improvement. The victory of the liberal state is directly related to the "attraction" and "vitality" of the market economy.
According to the statistics presented in the work of Fareed Zakaria, in 1900 no country was not what we now think of democracy - namely, the government formed after the elections, which may be open to all adult citizens. Today, such system operates in 119 countries, that is, 62% of all countries of the world. What once was the practice inherent in only a handful of states located on the shores of the North Atlantic, it has now become a familiar form of government for a significant portion of humanity. Outdated monarchy, fascism and communism is completely discredited. Even a Muslim theocracy attracts only a few fanatics. In the vast majority of democracy has become the only source of political legitimacy. Even if the opponents of democracy have resorted to its rhetoric and its rituals reproduce, so she really won. But this conclusion is too optimistic: it turned out that the structure of liberal democracy and liberal democracy often do not match. Thus, the path to liberal democracy in many countries is much more complex and tortuous than anticipated Fukuyama. But this, it seems, does not refute the theory of the American philosopher, and forces it to consider a broader time perspective and give it a more allegorical interpretation.
In my opinion, as the end of history can not be understood as a triumph of liberal democracy, but the creation of a system in which any attempts of resistance will be broken. And maybe after that nothing really happens, the world will be conflict-free society. Perhaps the story really is a one-way process that incorporates advances in science and technology, but that does not mean that this process should result and finish with a liberal democracy.

Bibliography:
Books:
1. Fukuiama, F. (2005 edition) 'The end of history and the Last Man'. (Philosophy). Retrieved on 18, April, 2013.
2. Lancov, S. (2006) 'World politics and International Relations'. Studybook. Retrieved on 18, April, 2013.
3. Zakaria F. (2004) 'The future of freedom: illiberal democracy in the United States and beyond'. Retrieved on 20, April, 2013.
Articles:
1. Sokovnina, S. (2001) Iurii Boldyrev: "Achieving something, if supported". Nezavisimaia gazeta. Retrieved on 21, April, 2013.
2. Hidekazu Kawai (1998) 'Japanese politics and Future World'. 日本の政治と未来の世界.Retrieved on 7, May, 2013.
3. Fukuiama, F. (1989). 'The end of History?'. The National Interest. Retrieved on 18, April, 2013.
4. Jacques Derrida (1994). Specters of Marx: State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Short summary. Retrieved on 7, May, 2013.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hoyasaxa

...region, continent to continent. One thing in common though, they all come down to similar controversies. Much controversy and debate aroused around what has become the center of debate and advocacy: human rights. In A Year of Living Dangerously, Francis Fukuyama (2008) argues that there must be a sense of unification among immigrants and citizens from the concerned home-country, and a method similar to the United States’ approach to assimilating immigrants, which Fukuyama claims to be successful. Fukuyama, however, is mistaken to claim that the United States’ approach to assimilating immigrants has been a successful one, in social terms. Fukuyama (2008) argues that the biggest challenge in achieving democracy is to assimilate citizens in a manner that would not provoke anger from either the immigrants or “right-wing populists” (p. 269). A bigger problem yet, is to impose a new national identity on the immigrants to enable them to connect with other citizens of different religions, ethnicities, and backgrounds into “a common democratic culture” (p. 270). He suggests that this could be achieved much like how the “American creed has served to unite new immigrants to the United States” (p. 270). These statements show that Fukuyama fails to recognize the flaws in the immigration assimilation method. Immigrant assimilation is assessed by four benchmarks: socio-economic status, geographic distribution, the attainment of a second language, and intermarriage. Although some immigrants...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Fukuyama’s and Hungtington’s Future

...FUKUYAMA’S FUTURE Fukuyama is best known as the author of The End of History and the Last Man, in which he argued that the progression of human history as a struggle between ideologies is largely at an end, with the world settling on liberal democracy after the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Fukuyama predicted the eventual global triumph of political and economic liberalism. "What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such... That is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government." According to Fukuyama, since the French Revolution, democracy has repeatedly proven to be a fundamentally better system (ethically, politically, economically) than any of the alternatives. The most basic (and prevalent) error in discussing Fukuyama's work is to confuse 'history' with 'events'. Fukuyama does not claim at any point that events will stop happening in the future. What he is claiming is that all that will happen in the future (even if totalitarianism returns) is that democracy will become more and more prevalent in the long term, although it may have 'temporary' setbacks (which may, of course, last for centuries). He believes that the European Union more accurately reflects what the world will look like at the end of history than the contemporary United States ...

Words: 563 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Ethics

...benefits of the research some might be slightly ok with using the animals. Often there is controversy over whether or not humans and animals should be held to an equal level, and even more whether or not animals can feel pain just as humans. Some just like Peter Singer who Francis Fukuyama discussed in his essay, seem to believe that animals should be held to a higher power and be considered more valuable than that of humans. Fukuyama quotes from Peter Singer in his article “Human Dignity”, “the need for animal rights, since animals can experience pain and suffering as well as humans, and the downgrading of the rights of infants and elderly people who lack certain key traits, like self-awareness, that would allow them to anticipate pain. The rights of certain animals in his view, deserve greater respect than those of certain human beings” (Fukuyama 190). Overall, Singer is saying that depending upon the mental ability of the human and depending upon the animal it may be in demand of much more reverence than the human. Of course, there are several opinions in which other would throw this out just as Fukuyama would. He believes in the exact opposite and focuses on the importance of “human dignity.” Fukuyama is a strong believer in everyone being held equal no matter “race, gender, disability, or virtually any...

Words: 1054 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Transhumanism: The World's Most Dangerous Idea

...Firstly bioethicists such as Francis Fukuyama meet the idea of transhumanism with a great deal of scepticism. Fukuyama is a Professor of International Political Economy at John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and member of the now defunct President’s Council on Bioethics under George W. Bush’s Presidency from 2001-2004. When asked by the Editors of Foreign Policy for the September/October 2004 edition of the magazine, what idea, if embraced, would pose the greatest threat to the welfare of humanity?’ Fukuyama replied ‘Transhumanism’. Continuing to describe it as ‘a strange liberation movement’ whose campaigners want nothing more than to ‘liberate the human race from its biological constraints’ (2004). Fukuyama however sees this as an undesirable future, one, which he describes as ‘coming at frightful moral cost’. He cites Aldous Huxley’s 1932 Novel Brave New World, stating that while there appears to be an ideal world free from disease, social conflict and mental illness, ‘where there is even a government ministry in place to assure that the time between desire and satisfaction is kept to a minimum’, it...

Words: 1622 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Have Western Liberal Democracies Effectively Responded to Challenges to Their Power? in Your Answer, Refer to at Least One Internal and One External Challenge.

...Have Western liberal democracies effectively responded to challenges to their power? In your answer, refer to at least one internal and one external challenge. Introduction In 1989 political scientist Francis Fukuyama declared “the end of history.”[1] Despite his language, Fukuyama was not an apocalyptic religious fundamentalist awaiting the rapture, but rather, he saw with the collapse of the Soviet Union the ultimate and final triumph of liberal democracy. Fukuyama draws on Marxist and Hegelian interpretations of the narrative of history as one of progress, in this case with its apex at the liberal democracy best represented by the United States of America. The triumphalism of this context may seem naïve in a post-9/11 world, but it should be seen in its original context of the decades long cold war between the US (and its allies) and the Soviet Union. These two sides came to represent an ideological conflict rather than a purely physical one, between liberal capitalist democracy and authoritarian communism, between free enterprise and central planning. Liberal democracy emerged victorious economically, politically and, Fukuyama would argue, philosophically. However, Fukuyama would be hard pressed to defend his near-eschatological optimism today, and Marxist critic Terry Eagleton has said that “the End of History is at an end.”[2] Rather than the comparatively monolithic opposition it experienced in the 20th Century, today the political dominance of liberal democracy is...

Words: 2309 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Chinese Nationalism: International Conflicts Between China And United States

...will lead to more conflicts, and may also strengthen the nationalism. Francis Fukuyama, one of the representative of the first group, argues that all countries will gradually move together and reach the liberal democracy in his book The End of History. In contrast, Samuel P. Huntington, another influential political scientist one of the representative of the second group, critiqued Fukuyama’s theory and argued that the individual civilizations will be strengthened under the globalization, and they will also clash with each other, finally cause more conflicts in his Clash of...

Words: 1248 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Dominating Forces Post Cold War Era

...its place is a collision of two opposing forces both competing to materialize as the new, dominant world order. There exists now an overarching battle between the assimilating force of globalization and the emphatic differentiation of cultural identity as a reaction. This structural dissonance in global relations has elevated inherently tense inter-state relationships and cleared a path for the rise of cultural nations within and across states seeking to solidify their distinctiveness and secure a role in the order of the new world. As the United States emerged victorious from the bipolarity of the Cold War era, so came her establishment as the hegemonic state of the world. This triumph of western liberalism symbolized what Francis Fukuyama deemed “the end of history” - the end of conflicting ideologies among the states which would lead to a world of perpetual peace. Fukuyama’s thesis is based on the Renaissance and Reformation of Europe and the Enlightenment experienced by North America and Europe (Packer. 2012.) Essentially, he argues that the progression of human history as a struggle between ideologies ends after the Cold War era; that the entire world will come to accept liberal democracy as the most desirable world order. The major fault in his theory, of course, lies in the simple fact that the Renaissance, Reformation, and Enlightenment were largely experienced only by western civilizations and therefore do not necessarily carry much weight with other civilizations...

Words: 1581 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

“Our Obligation Is to Give Meaning to Life, and in Doing so to Overcome the Passive, Indifferent Life”

...Author Note This paper was prepared for PHI 100: Introduction to Philosophy Homework Module #8 Taught by Professor David Smith 1. “Our obligation is to give meaning to life, and in doing so to overcome the passive, indifferent life” a quote by quote by Elie Wiesel, Nobel laureate for peace, Holocaust survivor and author. I do not know, I find times I believe life does not have meaning, and agree with the Nihilists, Taylor and Schopenhauer. There are times I believe I tread my own destiny and find meaning in what I do, like R. M. Hare Self-Chosen Commitment. I still have many questions left unanswered. I think we all, at one time or another ponders the meaning of life. I have concluded, and it is not 42, Elie is right, my world or my meaning of life is a succession of obligations. I do not know if it is good or not so good. Growing up, I had obligations to my mom and dad, later in life to God, as a solider I sought obligations to my country, then my wife and daughters and now to myself. Could I have lived my life differently and shied away from any obligation? I do not think so; something is side giving you the drive to seek what others will not. I do not know what that is, God? Maybe. So this one I would have to agree with Elie, and Hare, we give our own life meaning, or not 2. Of course human history is progressing, in science, technology, standards of living, socially and governing. Yet there were nearly 10,000 rapes last year and 16,254...

Words: 736 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Politics Essays - World Politics

...They were the most lethal terrorist attacks in history, taking the lives of 3000 American and international citizens and ultimately leading to changes in anti-terror approaches and operations in the U.S and around the globe. (www.fbi.gov). Before 9/11 occurred, the U.S was encountering a period of peace and economic boom. This fostered the illusion that International Relations were of no great significance in the wider arena. The American public and political classes were unconcerned with previous attacks on the World Trade Centre in 94, the attack on the USS Cole, and the attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Attacks of 9/11 and the fall of the World Trade Centre’s marked the beginning of the real 21st century. (Brown 04). 9/11 was not simply an act of terror but the most destructive single act of terror since World War 2. Many in the Islamic community saw the attack, as an attack on “the symbolic heart of global capitalism” (Brown 04). 9/11 galvanised the American people, and less then 12 hours after the attacks, president Bush formally declared a “war on terror”. Overnight America’s relationships with Russia, China and India improved. Britain and Australia were also seen as close allies. President Bush and his supporters stressed the need to go on the offensive against terrorists, to deploy the U.S. military, and to promote democracy in the Middle East. (Gordon 07). The U.S is fighting a war on terror and must remain on the offensive. The Bush administration feel,...

Words: 2090 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Synthetic Future

...The Synthetic Future The Synthetic Future Haydar K. Hamdan American University of Beirut English 203 Monday, October 14, 2013 Haydar K. Hamdan American University of Beirut English 203 Monday, October 14, 2013 Figure 1: The First 3D Printer Figure 1: The First 3D Printer Over the past decades, there has been a non-stop technological revolution. Every day there are new discoveries and inventions in different regions of the world. Humans have landed on the moon, discovered galaxies and stars, found cures for some deadly diseases and also invented equipment such as vehicles, airplanes, computers and many others to facilitate their lives. But one invention that might have the edge over the aforementioned inventions is the 3D printer. During 1984, Charles W. Hull of 3D Systems Corp designed the first ever working printer (Figure 1). But it was until 1990 that this invention started to gain importance. This was the beginning of an outbreak in this field. From that year on, scientists and innovators have worked on developing 3D printers and have been able to do so. Now, there are different kinds of 3D printers with different functions. Some of these printers are specialized in producing food, while other printers can print different kinds of objects; from decoration objects to synthetic body organs (PCMag.com, February 2012). 3D printing is a prototyping process where a 3D design is used to create real objects. The 3D-model is saved in STL (Stereo Lithography) format...

Words: 1641 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Assess the Relationship Between War-Fighting and Nation-Building.

...Contents General Models Nation Building and Political Development 1 Nation Building and War-fighting in Historical Perspective 4 Post Cold War Approaches to Nation-building: The Case of the United States: 6 Nation Building and War fighting: A Snapshot of the Record 8 Germany and Japan: misleading historical lessons, specious claims: 9 CONCLUSION 10 BIBLIOGRAPHY 11 ASSESS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WAR-FIGHTING AND NATION-BUILDING. Nothing is, and will remain in such short supply in the greater majority of the polities of the world’s ‘countryside’, as a sense of political community; and yet no such crucial term as ‘nation building’ has of recent been subjected to so much trivialisation and casual usage. This essay attempts to lay out what it is that nation building entails, as a background to assessing whatever linkage it may have with war fighting, causally or by coincidence. I outline existing schools of thought on nation building and demonstrate that it bore a clear relationship with war fighting especially in the dusk of the extensive empires of Western Europe. I argue that the United States had a much rosier experience by virtue of its geographical isolation, and of being constituted by an immigrant population, and as such, it may the least qualified actor to enforce nation building however construed. The essay points out the prevailing fallacy of conflating short-term post-conflict reconstruction with protracted nation building and state...

Words: 4569 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Has Sovereignty Changed With The Cold War's End?

...the United Nations to intervene in matters which are...within the domestic jurisdiction of any state,” (United Nations 1945). The fact that the UN is not a supranational dictatorial authority and its 193 member states retain their sovereign entitlements reflects this. Yet the international community has willingly disregarded state sovereignty through intervention; by losing its complete inviolability, sovereignty has been fundamentally changed. Close examination of the Cold War’s geopolitical consequences show that sovereignty has undergone monumental change. First of all, the number of vulnerable states saw an increase in the Cold War’s aftermath. For instance, Fukuyama notes that the Cold War left a number of “weak and failed states stretching from North Africa…the Balkans…the Middle East and South Asia,” (Fukuyama 2006, 2). Naturally, this led to a marked increase in intrastate conflicts like the civil war in former Yugoslavia. Furthermore, the USSR’s demise left the USA as the sole superpower; which meant that the ideological fault lines that had once hindered international cooperation disappeared. With many states in dire need of aid and without an ideological clash halting international cooperation, more humanitarian interventions were authorised than ever before. During the 1990s alone, the UN security council authorised 40 interventions (ICISS 2001). In contrast to only 18 authorised during the Cold War (United Nations 2013). The Cold War’s end had created a new international...

Words: 1085 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ideologies

...‘Ideologies have become irrelevant to the discussion of politics since the collapse of the communism in East Europe.’(Fukuyama francis,1989) I disagree with this statement in a large extent. Overview Fukuyama published the idea of ‘end of ideology’, which became a controversial issue in 1989. No doubt, fascism and communism had both lost their appeal after the collapse of the communism in east Europe. In the postwar period, the three ideologies-liberalism, socialism and conservation –came to accept the common goal of capitalism. ( Lee, 1990) However, it does not mean that capitalism is a triumph of the world. Jacques mentions that there are many types of Marxism. For instance, orthodox Marxism is produced by the unique history tradition. Therefore, when one specific communism is collapsed, it does not mean that the communism is collapsed. In fact, there still are states that pursue other types of communism. People reflect and become interested in Marxist if capitalism cannot bring them into utopian era. There is no way to say that ideologies are becoming irrelevant to the discussion of politics. Also, All human are political thinkers. We all have difficult thoughts and diverse perceptions when the things happen around us. Modern ideologies such as feminism and ecologism are witnessed. From the observations and judgments, we can find out our own belief of what our world is and what we ought to be. ‘equality , ’rights’ ,’freedom’ ,’justice’ are the expression...

Words: 2288 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Marketing Development

...In a book dealing with the art of creative management, Gareth Morgan cites a common view of marketers: They're peacocks …all show; no real substance. They look good; people like to watch; but they serve no useful purpose. Irish setters… very good looking dogs. But not very intelligent at all. They've no real knowledge.1 On the other hand, there is an argument that marketing is a source of competitive ability, economic growth, and wealth creation. A fundamental question that we should be asking is: If governments can no longer fix world markets, nor guarantee national market shares, who decides what the standards of quality, service and value are? Who decides who wins and loses? The answer is obvious: the customer. When we talk about new world competitive order it becomes obvious that customer choice, preference and demand are its exclusive driving forces. What we have come to call 'customer science' is pivotal. That, of course, is marketing. Marketing is, above all, a philosophy enshrining a long-term commitment to customer satisfaction and the deployment of a set of intense skills to achieve it. By definition, therefore, marketing is the key to profitable growth and must form part and parcel of every business operation.2 Therefore you can see that this latter perspective is based on the belief that marketing can provide a better understanding and assessment of the marketplace, including customers and competitive behaviour. When undertaking your reading...

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Universal Approach Case Study

...Murphy (1986) reminds us that in the U.K., the popularity of medical genetics and the abuse of Darwinism created increasingly racial and racist accounts of why certain groups of people were more degraded or tainted than others. Very little was known or researched on what was happening to large groups of individuals who were needing or seeking help in the context of alienation and disadvantage. Power in the two approaches Foucault points out that juridical systems of power produce the subjects they subsequently come to represent” Power in transcultural psychotherapy inevitably “reproduces” what it claims merely to “ represent”, which is decentralization and seclusion. Fukuyama (1991) commented that “many people belonging to cultural groups who do not fit within the dominant culture power structure experience various forms...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4