Premium Essay

Gender as a Social Contruct

In:

Submitted By priT
Words 1025
Pages 5
INTRODUCTION TO GENDER STUDIES GSSA 1004: MINOR ASSIGNMENT
Priyanka Thattengat a1608970

Connell writes “gender must be understood as a social structure. It is not an expression of biology, nor a fixed dichotomy in human life or character. It is a pattern in our social arrangements” (2009: 10). What did you think Connell means by this statement and can you give two examples to support your argument?

The separation of gender in society is an idea that has been ingrained into us from an early age. We are taught to recognize the differing characteristics and behaviors of each gender. Connell explores the idea that gender is not an expression of biology or a human characteristic but a complexity of our social structure. Similarly Cranny-Francis et al. explores the themes of ‘gender’ and ‘sex’ displaying how these terms relate and intersect. Both authors highlight the inequality of a fixed gender dichotomy present in society. Wright also supports this theory through her ted talk, Fifty Shades of Gay, exploring the contradictory ideas placed around the concept of gender. To understand what Connell means, we must first make the distinction between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’. Sex is defined as “a theory about human beings which divides them into two biologically based categories – male and female” (Cranny Francis et al. 2003: 7). Whereas gender is defined as, “the structure of social relations that centres on the reproductive arena, and the set of practices that bring reproductive distinctions between bodies into social processes” (Connell 2009: 11). Essentially explaining that gender is a cultural creation that has been built upon the concept of sex. However there are many varying definitions around ‘gender’ in which similarities of sex can be drawn. One of which takes the position that “gender is the cultural elaboration of sex, as a hierarchical pair

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Sociology

...Functionalism, strain and Subcultural theories Durkheim’s functionalist theory Functionalism – society based on value consensus. Members of society sharing common culture. In order to achieve this, two things needed: - Socialisation – helps ensure individuals share the same norms and values. Shows the way to act. - Social control – rewards for conformity and punishment for deviance. Controls behaviour. Inevitability of crime – functionalists see crime as inevitable and universal. Every society has crime. Two reasons why crime and deviance are in all societies: - No everyone is equally socialized into norms and values. Some are likely to be deviant. - Diversity of lifestyle and values. Different groups have their own subcultures with distinctive norms and values. Some may see deviant acts as normal. > Durkheim says in modern societies there is tendency towards anomie. The rules for behaviour become weaker and less clear-cut. This is because modern societies have a complex division of labour meaning individuals become more different from each other. Crime is more likely. Positive functions of crime – it also performs two positive functions Boundary maintenance - produces a reaction from society, uniting members in disapproval of criminals and reinforcing their commitment to shared norms and values. Adaptation and change – all change starts with an act of deviance. There must be scope to challenge existing norms and values and this will seem deviant in the...

Words: 7771 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Hedonic Consumption

...American Marketing Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Marketing. http://www.jstor.org Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions Author(s): Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Morris B. Holbrook Source: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer, 1982), pp. 92-101 Published by: American Marketing Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251707 Accessed: 07-09-2015 14:31 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251707?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 195.176.55.48 on Mon, 07 Sep 2015 14:31:12 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Elizabeth C. Hirschman & Morris B. Holbrook Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions Introduction URING the 1950s there was substantial discussion...

Words: 6224 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Will Do Next Time

...Instructor’s Manual and Test Bank to accompany A First Look at Communication Theory Sixth Edition Em Griffin Wheaton College prepared by Glen McClish San Diego State University and Emily J. Langan Wheaton College Published by McGraw­Hill, an imprint of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright Ó 2006,  2003, 2000, 1997, 1994, 1991 by The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The contents, or parts thereof, may be reproduced in print form  solely for classroom use with A First Look At Communication Theory provided such reproductions bear copyright notice, but may not be reproduced in  any other form or for any other purpose without the prior written consent of The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any  network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. PREFACE Rationale We agreed to produce the instructor’s manual for the sixth edition of A First Look at Communication Theory because it’s a first-rate book and because we enjoy talking and writing about pedagogy. Yet when we recall the discussions we’ve had with colleagues about instructor’s manuals over the years, two unnerving comments stick with us: “I don’t find them much help”; and (even worse) “I never look at them.” And, if the truth be told, we were often the people making such points! With these statements in mind, we have done some serious soul-searching about the texts that so many teachers—ourselves...

Words: 159106 - Pages: 637