Graffiti can be viewed as one of the most often happening aesthetic problems in the society. It is a widely spread criminal offensive practice in America and precisely within Los Angeles. Graffiti can also be defined as an extremely common form of visual contamination. Graffiti purely doesn't have the connection with any of the artistic representations, and it is strictly a criminal activity. In simplest terms, we can define graffiti as a form of drawing, portraying or utilization of any other medium used to leave imprints upon any kind of property, roads, buildings or subways. Graffiti if not prevented at the same time may lead to much more graffiti at the exact same location, and often this leads to some serious issues among the youngsters gangs designed to use graffiti as the dividing agent for their areas.

Some people throughout the world try to defend graffiti as sign of modern artistic genera which is totally baseless. Moreover, their claim to defend graffiti as a piece of art is not even justified. It is very easy to distinguish art forms from other visual contaminations. For instance, we can consider any visual item and filter it through several parameters like social value, economic background, aesthetic domain and the political impact of that particular art form. Unfortunately, in case of graffiti we get negative results from all the mentioned art marking variables.

Graffiti is a big reason and contributing factor for financial loss. Based on the statistical records, it is responsible for more or less eight million dollars every single year. The folks associated with Los Angeles on the individual basis pay almost nine hundred dollars to get rid of this particular visual criminal offense from the walls of their homes each year. The primary cause of rapid removal would be to avoid the graffitists from doing it once again. As if not really removed at once, the property becomes a permanent spot for the taggers to write or even sketch. This frequently results in the gang turmoil that is not inexpensive. In a broad spectrum, graffiti accounts for youngsters’ turmoil, monetary losses, and visual pollution along with a high rate of damage to the property. All of these elements are severe offences, and the sinner should be penalized according to the regulation. Commonly, a graffiti painter utilizes spray paint to mark the region of their bunch. Within absolutely no time if the owners of the actual property remove the graffiti object by paying to some graffiti removing company, the other competitors will use graffiti once again on the same site such as the very first bunch did. As a consequence, the whole region will be a site of graffiti. As this turmoil often turns in the fight, consequently, could be very serious. Moreover, if anyone intends to eliminate the bit of graffiti from the home, he needs to pay the removing company. These particular monetary losses upon his finances are not favored by the government, and that he alone accounts for losing. Therefore, graffiti within Los Angeles is a wide monetary reduction per annum the residents.

It is almost impossible to oppose the graffiti makers all the time. The best technique to stop them from spoiling the wall or the building can be a digital camera which can be employed to identify the individuals close to the property. This can be a very vital device, and the criminal could be captured even after running from the spot. In contrast to advertisement within the spray paint businesses, labeling that graffiti is really a crime, and also the culprit is going to be penalized thousand dollars or perhaps a couple of month prisons. The use of cameras ought to be employed for the hundred percent outcomes against the graffiti manage. The federation ought to lead within the installation of these surveillance cameras combined with the citizens. Areas of the region should be dispersed, and the federation should use surveillance digital cameras for the 24/7 inspection from the area.

A lot of people may criticize that setting up the actual monitoring digital cameras is an extremely expensive solution for the area, and it will be expensive a lot more than expectations. As mentioned previously, the federation should profit the individuals inside it. Subsequently, no matter how costly this solution is, this plan is not more than eight billions, which is the annual price of the actual graffiti elimination procedure. As everyone knows that different ways to prevent graffiti like indication boards, property prevention methods and the common understanding of individuals have failed in the past. Therefore, for my part the only effective operating solution to avoid graffiti is the utilization of digital cameras. By the smart use of surveillance digital cameras, we are able to easily manage the graffiti once forever.

It is clear from the mentioned facts that Graffiti has no artistic background. This is no more than a medium to zone the regions by the local teenage gangs. Graffiti being an offense should be penalized at every step, and the federation should take some serious stops to eliminate the graffiti artists. For the sake of supposition if still, people consider it an art form, then why they do not buy canvas and papers for their art? Why they use public property without permission to draw sexual content and anti-social elements? Who gave them right to destroy the subways and the residential regions? There are many questions which any favorer of graffiti can never answer.