Premium Essay

Hebb and Bolles

In:

Submitted By luckie20
Words 1317
Pages 6
Contributions from Donald O. Hebb and Robert C. Bolles
Specialized research in the brain sciences has increased dramatically in recent years. Many psychologists have contributed important foundations and findings in the brain sciences. There have been many important discoveries that offer links between brain science and learning. Donald O. Hebb and Robert C. Bolles have made significant contributions to the field of learning and cognition.
Donald Olding Hebb was a prominent Canadian psychologist. Hebb's work has been highly influential in the area of neuropsychology. His contributions included connections in cell assemblies, phase sequences, effects of environments on learning, and work dealing with the effects of short term and long term memory (Olson & Hergenhahn, 2013). He sought to understand how the function of neurons contributed to psychological processes such as learning. Hebb was instrumental in defining psychology as a biological science by identifying thought as the integrated activity of the brain (Brown, 2003). His views on learning described behavior and thought in terms of brain function, explaining cognitive processes in terms of connections between neuron assemblies. These ideas played a large part in his views on education and learning. His greatest achievement was to persuade psychologist that in order to understand the behavior of living organisms you must study the neural machinery responsible for that behavior (Pinel, 2009). Hebb proposed that neural structures called “cell assemblies” made up the basis of mental concepts. This cell assembly is the brain's thoughts or ideas. This cell assemblies work together to form phase sequences, which are streams of thoughts. Once these cell assemblies and phase sequences are formed, they can be activated by stimulation from the environment. The more stimulating the environment, the more

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Motivation Table

...University of Phoenix Material Motivation Concepts Table Use the following table to complete the Motivation Concept Table assignment for Week One. You are encouraged to modify table formatting to suit your needs. Please consult with course instructor for additional assignment specifications. The completed table will serve as a resource for the remainder of the course. | | |Time Period Created | | |Theory Name |Major Theorist(s) | |Key Theory Concepts | |Will: |Descartes |1637 |Will motivates all actions. | | | | | | | | | |Will is an initiated and directed action. | | |Ruckmick |1936 |Striving to create impulses to act. Ruckmick | | | | |identified striving as an act of will in 1936.| | | | |The ability to resist self-denial or | | | ...

Words: 436 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Motivation Concepts Table and Analysis

... Biological urges impulses and appetites. Freud’s Drive Theory Freud 1915 All behavior is motivated to serve the fulfillment of need. Hull’s Drive Theory Hull 1943 and 1952 Drive is a physiological basis and bodily need is the ultimate basis of motivation. Drive can be predicted before it occurs. Decline of Drive Theory Sheffield & Roby 1950 Learning can occur when there is no equivalent experience of drive decline. Harlow 1953 Learning occurs when there is a drive reductions and well as an increase in drive. Klien 1954 Motivation can result from something other than bodily disturbances. Bolles 1972 A decrease in drive is not necessary for learning to occur. Theory Name Major Theorist(s) Time Period Created Key Theory Concepts Post-Drive Theory Years Bolles 1975 Had the dominant perspective on motivation. Berlyne 1967 Optimal level of arousal Hebb 1955 Olds 1969 Pleasure centers in the brain Miller 1948 Approach and avoidance conflicts, conditioned motives Murray 1938 Universal Needs Rogers 1959 Self-actualization Dynamics of Action Achievement motivation Theory Atkinson 1964 Some of the mini-theories that works to understand or investigate one area, such as motivational phenomenon, particular circumstance, groups of people and theoretical question. Cognitive Perspective Attribution Theory of achievement Weiner 1972 Lazarus 1984 Scherer...

Words: 856 - Pages: 4