Free Essay

Henry Iv

In:

Submitted By yaxi
Words 1186
Pages 5
The Willingness of Henry IV to Embrace Religious Toleration Henry IV of France, born Henry de Bourbon, was the son of Jeanne d’Albret the King of Navarre. Although baptized as a Roman Catholic, young Henry was raised as a Protestant. During the French Wars of Religion, he joined the Huguenot forces and became one of the leading Huguenots after the deaths of both Conde and Coligny. He was crowned King Henry III of Navarre after the death of his mother in June of 1572. After the third and bloodiest of the religious wars, which ended after the signing of the Peace of Saint-Germain-En-Laye, Catherine de Medici, who was Queen of France at the time, arranged to have her daughter, Margaret, marry Henry III of Navarre, in an attempt to cement the peace. The marriage was unpopular with many prominent Catholics, especially Pope Gregory XIII and King Philip II of Spain. Soon after the marriage, the Massacre of St Bartholomew’s Day broke out, over 20000 Protestants were killed in four days throughout France. The King of France at the time, Henry the III, attempted to guide the nation by steering a course between the vengeful Huguenots, and the Catholic League which was a large organization of zealous and dedicated Catholics. Henry granted the Huguenots almost complete religious and civil freedom with the Peace of Beaulieu in 1576, but he was forced to revoke it the next year because of Catholic League pressure. In the mid 1580’s, the Catholic League became dominant in France. After he failed to defeat the Catholic League, Henry III was forced to ally himself with Henry of Navarre. Soon after, however, Henry III was assassinated by a Dominican monk, and Henry of Navarre, because of his marriage and distant royal heritage, became the first Protestant King of France. He soon converted to Catholicism in order to unify France, and he granted many freedoms to the Huguenots in his Edict of Nantes. Henry of Navarre’s limits on accepting religious toleration were that politics and nation came before religion; and his views were shaped by the religious conflicts leading up to the Edict of Nantes. Henry III of Navarre is remembered for unifying France after many wars and conflicts between religious denominations. Henry’s mother, Jeanne d’Albret, who had converted to Calvinism, raised Henry as a Protestant or more accurately, as a Huguenot. However Henry was a politique, or a person who sets aside their personal religious beliefs for the greater good. As King Henry IV of France, he was the monarch of a nation that was comprised of 90% Catholics and had just emerged from a series of bloody conflicts and massacres between religious denominations, and was resting upon an uneasy peace. Partly because of the threat of direct Spanish intervention, and partly because he wanted to unify France, King Henry IV “publicly abandoned the Protestant faith and embraced the traditional and majority religion of his country,” (KOT 357) and was reported to have said “Paris is well worth a mass.” This showed that Henry was long weary of religious strife and was fully prepared to place a simple political peace above absolute religious unity in France. He believed a royal policy of tolerant Catholicism would be the best way to achieve such a peace. (KOT 357) The choice to convert to Catholicism was a wise one, as it turned out. King Henry was very popular among his people. Informal in both dress and manner, he quickly gained the loyalty of his people despite his Protestantism. A factor of this acceptance could have possibly been his heredity which clearly linked him to past monarchs and guaranteed his eligibility to the throne despite what many saw as his heretical beliefs. (KOT 356) With the Edict of Nantes, he proclaimed a formal religious settlement, one designed to pacify all the parties that had previously been at each other’s necks in bloody conflict, so that France, and the French people, would never have to endure the looming specter of a religious war again. To do this, he assured the Huguenots religious freedom and rights, and allowed them to go to university and hold public office, usually, though, within their territory. (KOT 357-358) Henry IV was willing to endure as much religious toleration as was necessary to reconstruct France from the ashes of a religious war, and to ensure that the safety, stability, and security of the state came before the personal beliefs of any group, large or small. Henry IV’s ideas on society and religion were influenced by the events of the decades before his rise to power. The Edict of Nantes was formed as a result of the long years of war as well as other religious conflict, and their effect on Henry of Navarre. Henry would later in his life see the years of bloody conflict between the religious groups as a reason enough to pursue tolerance between religions. Henry realized that neither group, be it the Huguenots or the radical Catholics, were going to be entirely eliminated from France, so religious toleration and compromise would allow France to rise from the neo-civil war that had engulfed and weakened it considerably. He turned his back on the total religious unity that was so characteristic of early medieval Europe was no longer possible. Henry decided that France should move on and recover as well they could from the wars and not make the same devastating mistake twice. His near death experience during the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s day reinforced his stance as a politique. He was convinced that as a ruler, he had to strike a balance between the total Catholicism wanted by the Pope and Philip II of Spain, and the complete religious freedom wished for by the Huguenots. To this end, in his Edict of Nantes, he granted to the Huguenots almost every right they had been pushing, fighting, and dying for as well as reaffirming that France was an officially Catholic nation, and all citizens, whether they were Catholic or Protestant, had to pay the tithe and follow Catholic holidays. (The Edict of Nantes)
In conclusion, King Henry IV’s willingness to accept religious toleration was a manifestation of the belief that the nation as a whole must be placed above individual religious beliefs of any person or groups views. His were shaped by the decades of religious conflict and the realization that a total religious hegemony was no longer possible in post-reformation Europe. Though he was faced with daunting challenges from outside forces such as the ardently catholic Spain and a hostile papacy, as well as having the burden to reform and reunite a nation torn apart by a lasting religious conflict, Henry’s grand vision and decisive actions in steering France toward religious peace and harmony, would make him remembered as one of France’s most popular kings who had the support of the people and succeeded in creating a much more powerful France.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. http://www.french-at-a-touch.com/French_History/edict_of_nantes_%5B1589%5D.htm

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hal And Falstaff In Shakespeare's Henry IV

...In Henry IV Part 1, Shakespeare truly embodies the conflicts of friendships, which he does so in the relationship of Hal and Falstaff. Henry IV Part 1 by Shakespeare is a story about the king of England at the time, Henry IV, but mainly focuses on his son Hal, and his relationships all of his friends, but Falstaff in particular. Hal and Falstaff have a complex friendship, because it is hard to decipher if there is true loyalty, emotion, and lovingness between the two, but Falstaff seems to be truly invested and on the other hand Hal looks like he is in this relationship just for his own comedic benefit. Hal shows Falstaff little love throughout the play even when he thinks Falstaff is dead. During Act 1 Scene 2, when Falstaff wakes up in the bar asking Hal the time of day, instead of...

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Comparison of Ofvtcn and Henry Iv

...Ramandeep Lobana, ENG 4UO-A Wednesday July 16th, 2014 A Comparison of the Fatherly Figures in William Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1 and Dale Wasserman’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest A father figure is a man to whom a person looks up to and whom he treats like a father. Fathers who have an involved relationship with children are more likely to have an impact on their social and emotional development (Rosenberg). In the play, Henry IV ,Part 1 by William Shakespeare, there are two main plots that converge in a melodramatic action at the end. One of the plots is between Hal and his relationship with his father whereas the second plot is about Hotspur and other noblemen that form a rebellion against King Henry. In the other play, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, by Dale Wasserman, McMurphy, the protagonist, rebels against the authority of Nurse Ratched, the antagonist, to change the way the patients are treated. Through genuine love and leading Hal and the patients, both McMurphy and Falstaff act as father figures. However, McMurphy protects his patients whereas Falstaff’s cowardly behaviour restrains him from helping Hal. To start off, McMurphy and Falstaff give Hal and the patients advice that guides them and helps them cope with their difficulties. Firstly, McMurphy tries to educate the patients to give them a better understanding of Nurse Ratched's real personality. For example, when the patients tell McMurphy how caring Nurse Ratched is, McMurphy furiously tells...

Words: 1246 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

From Anarchy to Law—the Prince’s Motivation in Henry Iv Part Two

...Shuai Shao ENGL2000 Text and Contexts Professor Furry 10/10/15 From Anarchy to Law—The Prince’s Motivation in Henry IV Part Two Henry IV Part Two depicts the last preparatory phase before Prince Hal’s ascension to the throne. Through the entire play, Shakespeare illustrates Hal’s journey to self-discovery, a process of maturation that is a prerequisite to becoming a successful ruler. Shakespeare complicates this course of development by giving Prince Hal a complex character. The young prince’s physical journey from the court to the tavern and back to the court again corresponds to his psychological process of self-retrospection. Nevertheless, as the heir to the throne, Prince Hal’s underlying motivation for appearing to transform from a reckless and irresponsible young man to a just and honorable ruler is clear. He is politically inclined and actively looking for opportunities to gain support. Even though Prince Hal is aware of the heavy burdens and responsibilities of a king, he is confident enough that he can effectively manipulate people’s expectations to perform well. Some readers believe that at the beginning of Henry IV Part One, Prince Hal reveals his evil nature and the desire to betray his lowlife friends by delivering the speech, “By so much shall I falsify men’s hopes, and like bright metal on a sullen ground, my reformation, glittering o’er my fault, shall show more goodly, and attract more eyes, than that which hath no foil to set it off” (1.2.217-221). However...

Words: 1630 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Essay On King Henry IV

...repeat itself. From the battle fields of England and France, all the way to Ancient Rome, leaders of the state will take any action necessary to protect the state, other than place themselves in harm’s way, as without them, no state exists. King Henry IV fascinated Shakespeare; the author tells the man’s achievements over the course of two plays. In 1 Henry IV, the monarch faces rebellion from both Scottish...

Words: 1093 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Suck

...exploration being done Jacquie’s Cartier made voyages between 1534 and 1543. However, Canada’s severe winters made him give up and as a consequence, the French ignored most of Canada only paying attention to a few fur traders and fisherman. As time went on the fisheries began having great success which made them grow in numbers that rivaled those of New Spain in volume of shipping. In 1550 the French spread to Havannah and along the Atlantic coast of Florida. This is where New Spain was settled in. As a Result, Pedro Mendez de Aviles attacked them in 1565, and executed those individuals who did not want to convert to Catholicism. Because of Francis’s wars of religion more efforts were blocked for the rest of the century. Then King Henry IV came into power and believed that the survival of the state should take precedence over religious precedence. Someone with the same ideals was a Catholic Soldier and explorer by the name of Samuel De Champlain. Champlain made voyages to Canada with the hope and belief that Catholics and Huguenots could work together and even intermarry. In 1608 he established friendly relations with local Indians where he established Quebec. In 1625 the French crown declared that only the Catholic faith could be practiced in New France. Furthermore, in 1638, Jesuit Missionaries made great efforts to convert Indians. As a consequence, they were able to convert over 10,000 Indians within 40 years; however problems such as suspicion of witchcraft reduced...

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Dsadsad

...Graph ng France Henry IV * Ipinalabas niya ang Edict of Nantes upang ang mga digmaan sanhi ng relihiyon na nagbibigay sa mga Huguenot ng kalayaan sa pagsamba at pantay na karapatan pulitikal na tinatamasa ng mga Katoliko. Louis XIII * Muling nalugmok ang France sa kaguluhan ngunit hindi madaling nagupo ang pundasyong itinatag ni Henry IV. Para maipagpatuloy ang panuntunan ng kanyang aman, pinili niya si Richelieu bilang Punong Ministro. Richelieu * May 2 siyang layunin ang gawing makapangyarihan at maging pangunahin lakas ito sa Europe * Pinalakas ang pamahalaan local at nagatas ng mga mangangasiwa na tinatawag na intendants, sa maikling panahon lubos na nakontrol ng intendants ang local na pamahalaan Thirty Years Wars * Sa paghangad ng france na pigilan ang dominasyon ng mga Hapsburg sa Europe pumasok ito sa thirty years wars. Nang tila magwakas na ang digmaan biglang sumanib ang France sa protestante ang france at mga kaalyansa nito ay nagtagumpay. Winakasan ng Kasunduan sa Westphalia ang digmaan. Ang kinilalang makapangyarihang estado pagkatapos ng digmaan ay france Kasunduan sa Westphalia * Ang naging pangunahing bunga ng digmaan ay ang pagangat ng france bilang pangunahing kapangyarihan sa Europe at paghina ng Hapsburg sa Germany at Spain. Humina ang kanilang emperador. Patakarang military ni Louis XIV May nagawang mali si Louis XIV na naghakbang sa paghina ng france. Inakala niya na hindi tapat at mapanganib ang mga Huguenot kaya pinawalang-bisa...

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Growth of French Power

...The Growth of French power Around this time both French and English power became two very different city states. The English went the route of a constitutional monarchy with their Kings being a symbol of power but still kept in check by parliament and the rights of its subjects. In the meantime the French model went the route of a full monarchy where the Kings power was considered absolute as they were thought to have been chosen by gods will to rule its subjects and thus were above everyone else. The divine right of king’s theory as it was known gave the kings a kind of sanctity to which the kings often exploited in order to have their commands carried out upon its people. Having recognized that the representative assemblies still maintained some rights the assemblies in this case being deputies from the elites such as the clergy, nobility, and leaders of the cities took power from them and eliminated any interference from the church thus giving the kings full power over all. Once this level of power had been attained it was then a constant power struggle between the monarchy and the papacy. Where the kings insisted they keep a well subdued nation through the power of the pulpits within the church. As the pulpits preached religion so too did they preach submission to civil authority. The monarchy’s ability to appoint heads of the church made it so that the church would remain under their control as well. In 1516 after negotiation with pope Leo X agreed to allow the French...

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Henry IV Vs. Perry Supreme Court Case Study

...Conflicts between secular and non-secular leaders continued through the middle ages into modern times through arguments over who really has control such as the Van Orden vs Perry Supreme Court Case and arguments between leaders such as Pope Gregory II and King Henry IV. Pope Gregory stated made a series of statement in the Dictatus Papae that angered many secular leaders, particularly Henry IV. Pope Gregory stated,” ... the church was founded by God alone. The Roman pontiff alone can be called universal. He alone can depose or reinstate bishops. It may be permitted to him to depose emperors.” This angered many non-secular leaders, because if the Pope had the ability to depose (remove) or reinstate (bring back) the Pope frightened the Secular leaders such as Kings, because they could be...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Gregory Vii (Hildebrand)

...was abbot, and he probably took monastic vows. The Emperor Henry III took him to Germany, and he continued his studies in Cologne. Very likely he also visited Aix-la-Chapelle and Cluny. He attended the council at Worms at which Bishop Bruno of Toul was chosen Pope (Leo IX), and the latter took him to Rome (1049) and made him a cardinal subdeacon. He had great influence during the pontificate of Leo. On the latter's death (1054) the Roman people manifested a desire to have Hildebrand as successor; but this honor he declined, preferring to gain more experience. Besides important domestic employments which were assigned to him, he was sent as legate to the Council of Tours (1054), in which the cause of Berengarius was examined. (See BERFEGARIUS of TOURS.) He was likewise one of the three legates dispatched to Germany to consult about a successor to Leo IX. Under the four popes who followed Leo--Victor II, Stephen IX, Benedict X, and Alexander II, known in history as the German popes--Hildebrand continued to be the predominant. Power and inspired into their government of the Church the great principles to which his life was devote. Henry IV (1050-1106) was Holy Roman emperor and king of Germany from 1056 to 1106. An able, ruthless, and secretive monarch, he led the empire into a disastrous confrontation with Pope Gregory VII in the Investiture Controversy. Born in Goslar, Saxony, Henry IV was the only son of Emperor Henry III and Agnes of...

Words: 1652 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ap Euro Notes

...AP EUROPEAN HISTORY NOTES- Filled with silliness and inside jokes, enjoy at your leisure :) If something is in [] brackets, it is only written in there for our pleasure, ignore it if you are looking for actual information. Key: • 7: The Renaissance and Reformation- 1350-1600 UMSUniversal o Georgio Vasari- Rinascita=rebirth (like Renaissance) painter/architect Male Suffrage o Individualism: People sought to receive personal credit for achievements, unlike medieval ideal of “all glory goes to god” Names Ideas o Renaissance: Began in Italian city-states, a cause de invention of the printing press, laid way for Protestant Reformation Events Books/Texts Italy: City states, under HRE (Holy Roman Empire) o For alliances:  old nobility vs. wealthy merchants FIGHT P-Prussia  Popolo: third class, “the people”, wanted own share of wealth/power R-Russia A-Austria  Ciompi Revolts: 1378 Florence, Popolo were revolting [eew], brief period of control over government B-Britain  Milan taken over by signor (which is a tyrant) • o Under control of the Condottiero (mercenary) Sforza- Significant because after this, a few wealthy families dominated Venice (e.g. Medici) Humanism: Francesco Petrarch (Sonnets), came up with term “Dark Ages”, began to study classical world of rhetoric and literature  Cicero: Important Roman, provided account of collapse of Roman Republic [like Edward Gibbon], invented Ciceronian style: Latin style of writing...

Words: 17289 - Pages: 70

Free Essay

How Accurate Is It to Say That One of the Reasons That Henry V Invaded France in 1415 Was to Strengthen His Position as King of England?

...accurate to say that one of the reasons that Henry V invaded France in 1415 was to strengthen his position as King of England, but it is not the only reason nor is it necessarily the main reason; France’s domestic situation, and Scotland’s lack of threats were also reasons why England invaded France at that time. One of the main reasons why Henry V invaded France was indeed that he wanted to strengthen his position as the King of England; Henry had inherited the throne from his father, Henry IV, who had had many troubles during his reign regarding his line to the throne: many thought that Henry IV had a weak claim to the Crown, and the line to the throne was weakened by the fact that he had usurped the role from Richard II and had not been Richard’s heir. Henry V wanted to strengthen his claim to the throne and secure his position as King of England by invading France in 1415; invading France would have shown that Henry was a traditional King and intended to win his support and honour on the battle field like many of the Medieval Kings before him, showing that he could be a strong and worthy King, which also counteracted his father’s abilities in later life: Henry IV had become ill during the later years of his life and could not campaign to places like Wales and Scotland in person, meaning that he had lost some support over the years, though his son, the future Henry V, had taken over the roles of business and government. Henry would have also invaded France in 1415 to establish...

Words: 1116 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

To Kill a Mockingbird

...England is tense: King Henry IV has died, and his son, the young King Henry V, has just assumed the throne. Several bitter civil wars have left the people of England restless and dissatisfied. Furthermore, in order to gain the respect of the English people and the court, Henry must live down his wild adolescent past, when he used to consort with thieves and drunkards at the Boar’s Head Tavern on the seedy side of London. Henry lays claim to certain parts of France, based on his distant roots in the French royal family and on a very technical interpretation of ancient land laws. When the young prince, or Dauphin, of France sends Henry an insulting message in response to these claims, Henry decides to invade France. Supported by the English noblemen and clergy, Henry gathers his troops for war. Henry’s decision to invade France trickles down to affect the common people he rules. In the Boar’s Head Tavern in Eastcheap, some of the king’s former friends—whom he rejected when he rose to the throne—prepare to leave their homes and families. Bardolph, Pistol, and Nim are common lowlifes and part-time criminals, on the opposite end of the social spectrum from their royal former companion. As they prepare for the war, they remark on the death of Falstaff, an elderly knight who was once King Henry’s closest friend. Just before his fleet sets sail, King Henry learns of a conspiracy against his life. The three traitors working for the French beg for mercy, but Henry denies their request...

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Battle of Agincourt

...Agincourt: An Unexpected Victory The King of England, Henry V, accomplished one of the most memorable and significant feats of his reign by conquering the French at the Battle of Agincourt. The invasion of France started in the late summer of 1415 when King Henry V was only twenty-seven years of age and had only spent two years as king of England. Many historians have conjectured about his battle strategy upon entry into battle, but his exact planned methods and tactics still cannot be determined. However, the history of the battle is better documented than most, and because of these accounts, historians are able to determine a much clearer picture of the actual events as they took place. One of Henry’s chaplains, along with the Lord of Saint-Remy, wrote their accounts of the battle’s events. The French brought along historians by the names of Enguerrand de Monstrelet and Waurin. There were many secondary sources that contributed greatly to what is know of the battle, but the highest volume of information came from these four men. Nonetheless, something that cannot be documented is where Henry V and his men drew their motivation to enter battle facing a seemingly insurmountable opponent, and leave with victory. The conflict between these two countries over the years reached a boiling point, which lifted tensions high enough to bring the armies within range. This lesson shows that an inferior force can win a land battle given the right battlefield, social population...

Words: 2383 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Awesome

...Alen Kaminsky 4/15/15 The Life of a Serf in the Medieval Age Henry was a man of few words, and a man with a great deal of responsibility in his life. Being a serf in Medieval Europe was definitely not the easiest of tasks to have. Henry was a man with a family a wife, a son, and an ailing mother, whom he was forced to take care of in their very petite living area. Henry was from France, and served under King Philip II Augustus (AKA Philip II of France), who served Capetian France from 1180-1223. The man was a menacing leader who believed in war first tactics to resolve issues. He used war methods to win back property that originally belonged to France, and “Waged war against the Plantagenet rulers of England” whom ruled the French territories of Normandy, Maine, Anjou, and Aquitaine. You can also attribute his war tactics, and successes to the surplus of income he’d brought to the French monarchy. Henry was among the many serfs whom served under Philip II, but he’d always seem to come out as the favorite in terms of his overall help to Philip II. Henry was a head grounds man to the gardens set up along the palace in which Philip II resided. On top of being a great help to the king, he was an avid supporter of his majesty, and was no pacifist in the slightest, as he supported all the war tactics used to gain back French land from the English. While being a diligent worker was key to his successes in the life of a serf, the negatives of the life were very evident as...

Words: 1177 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

King Henry V

...William Shakespeare’s Henry V is based on the exploration of leadership. Although the film was difficult to follow at times, certain diction and actions of the characters made the film easier to follow. The diction and actions of King Henry V definitely showcased his abilities as a leader. Henry V focuses on leadership development by concentrating on succession, conflict and redemption. In the film, Henry V shows growth through stature and ability all while developing skills and credibility in the eyes of his followers. Because of this growth, Henry V comes to epitomize transformational leadership through his use of key qualities like vision and values, energy and a teachable point of view. It is through his use of vision and values, energy and a teachable point of view that his followers witness not only his growth as a leader, but also his attention to England’s well-being, unifying his realm and achieving organizational goals. When young King Henry V assumed the throne of his father, Henry IV, he was adamant on gaining the respect of the English people and the court. In order to gain this respect, Henry V had to live down his wild adolescent past in which he befriended drunkards and thieves and showed disrespect to the throne. As shown in the film, Henry V was willing to do whatever was necessary to disassociate himself with his adolescent past. If this meant rejecting his former drunkard and thieve friends, then Henry would do it. Even Henry, himself, killing one...

Words: 1435 - Pages: 6