Premium Essay

Individuality In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead

Submitted By
Words 815
Pages 4
The idea of not giving into anyone, of not letting anyone affect one’s own decisions and beliefs, builds a strong personality. In The Fountainhead, Howard Roark has the same, uncompromising personality. No matter what others think of him or do to him, he does what he thinks is right. Similarly, when Ellsworth Toohey asks Roark what Roark thinks of Toohey after everything Toohey does to him, Roark merely says “But I don’t think of you,” (Rand 401) in order to show that nothing bothers Roark, a trait of his personality. The brief exchange between Toohey and Roark clearly depicts the theme of individuality as Roark’s line expresses the true meaning of the theme.
The theme of the novel has a deeper, underlying meaning to it. Rand tries to promote …show more content…
Roark was asked to create traditional models at the Stanton Institute instead of modern ones. When Roark said he would not change his ideas, he was expelled. Even the Dean had told him that Roark would be able to come back, but Roark denied the offer because that meant he would have to change his ideas. During that encounter, Roark said “It’s past. There’s no point in discussing my choice of subjects now,” which shows that Roark does not care about the past and what has happened (Rand 9). This statement ties in with the second part of the theme, which is to not let anything bring one down. He was untouched by what had happened, only about himself and how he had to keep moving on. This situation is the same situation as the one with Toohey during which Roark shows that no one matters to him and rather he cares about doing what he feels is right and deciding what to do …show more content…
Toohey had belittled Roark numerous times in The Banner which led to Roark not receiving any jobs and loosing the temple assignment. As a result, once the temple was completed, Roark went to see the final result where he conversed with Toohey. Toohey tried to anger Roark by reminding him of the past, in order to hurt Roark’s image even more. But Roark said he did not think about Toohey without showing any passion (Rand 401). This line clearly depicts the theme of individuality. It shows that even after Toohey took away Roark’s job and ruined his image in society, Roark did not care at all because he did what he felt was right. Roark did not give in to society. Roark showed Toohey that Toohey was not significant enough for Roark to think about Toohey. Roark ignored Toohey similar to the way he ignored all the articles that insulted him, his professors and the Dean. Roark felt that if he gave in to Stoddard’s demands, he would be at the same level as Toohey and hence would be corrupted. However, the characteristic of not being influenced shows how individuals like Roark are stronger and see themselves as elevated above everyone else, simply due to their strong personality which never lets them

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Individuality In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...Anthem Contest Essay Within the dystopian setting of Ayn Rand’s Anthem, the human spirit is enslaved and oppressed. Living under a totalitarian dictatorship, all people are obligated to live unselfishly. Beneath this collectivist regime, everyone lives a life of servitude and dependence on one another. There is no individuality, no identity, no sense of self, no word “I”. Taking its place is the word “WE”, emphasizing the collective body that encompasses all. In order for the State to maintain control over its subordinates, it has meticulously brainwashed all to believe that it is wrong to be different, to have a preference, to be superior, and to think or act independently from the collective. With these rules as the moral doctrine, each person is...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Comparing Roark And Toohey's The Fountainhead

...Howard Roark and Ellsworth Toohey are declared in The Fountainhead where they both exclaim prime illustrations of a realistic perspective. Specifically, Roark is the hidden side of society that is obsolete, and hard to understand that is actually among realization. Evidently, Roark is an exemplar of the "individual" that is truly successful for his talents, reason, drive, and inner beliefs: " they were sketches of buildings such as had never stood on the face of the earth."-(7). Roark absorbs his art impression into buildings and architecture. His artistic view is quite unorthodox that is questioned. Society's view on abstract structure is irrelevant to Roark's behavior. He avoids any temptation of conformity to commit to his personal...

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Becuz

...Anthem by Ayn Rand Author's Foreword |F.1 |This story was written in 1937. | |F.2 |I have edited it for this publication, but have confined the editing to its style; I have reworded some passages and cut | | |out some excessive language. No idea or incident was added or omitted; the theme, content and structure are untouched. The| | |story remains as it was. I have lifted its face, but not its spine or spirit; these did not need lifting. | |F.3 |Some of those who read the story when it was first written, told me that I was unfair to the ideals of collectivism; this | | |was not, they said, what collectivism preaches or intends; collectivists do not mean or advocate such things; nobody | | |advocates them. | |F.4 |I shall merely point out that the slogan "Production for use and not for profit" is now accepted by most men as | | |commonplace, and a commonplace stating a proper, desirable goal. If any intelligible meaning can be discerned in that | | |slogan at all, what is it, if not the idea that the motive of a man's work must be the needs of others, not his own need, | | |desire or gain? ...

Words: 22792 - Pages: 92