...Introduction to Torts Victor M. Salas-Pellot PA165-01 – Unit 3 Professor Laurence Mraz Kaplan University February 19, 2013 FACTS: Leroy McPhillen was a regular patron of The Bottom’s Up Pub, an intoxicated man named John, began shouting obscenities at a woman seated at a table near Mr. McPhillen. As the woman ignored the man’s ranting, the man approached the woman in a threatening manner. Before the man reached the woman, Mr. McPhillen invited the man to join him at his table. The man refused and grabbed the woman’s wrist. Mr. McPhillen then carefully twisted the man’s arm behind his back and restrained him with a neck hold. Mr. McPhillen refused the man’s request to release him, and firmly seated the man and threatened to punch him if he moved. The woman then informed Mr. McPhillen that the man was her husband. ISSUE: The questions presented are which intentional torts were committed, and what defenses are available to the tortfeasors? Both John and Leroy are guilty of committing intentional torts. Both parties have debatable defenses. Though the fact remains that more information is needed regarding the events that occurred prior to the assault and battery to the woman, and the time of how long the intoxicated man was confined. Before determining...
Words: 1003 - Pages: 5
...carefully twisted the man’s arm behind his back and restrained him with a neck hold. Mr. McPhillen refused the man’s request to release him, and firmly seated the man and threatened to punch him if he moved. The woman then informed Mr. McPhillen that the man was her husband. Issue / Questions presented: The questions presented are (1) which intentional torts were committed, and (2) what defenses are available to the tortfeasors? Short Answer: In this case, both the intoxicated man and Mr. McPhillen are in fact guilty of committing intentional torts. Both parties do have arguable defenses available. However, more information is needed regarding (1) events occurring prior to the Assault and Battery on the woman, and (2) the duration of the intoxicated man’s confinement. In order to determine which applicable statutes apply, and each party’s available defenses, we must first define each intentional tort committed. PA165-01 (Unit 3) 2 Intentional Torts Committed: 1A. The first intentional tort was the intoxicated man’s shouting obscenities at the woman, approaching her in a threatening manner, and finally grabbing her wrist. Regardless of her relationship to him, his actions are considered an Assault and Battery. All elements necessary to constitute this offense are present, as...
Words: 1191 - Pages: 5
...deserving of the reward expected. Tort law can be misused and in most cases it is. At times that tort law includes the protective barrier over criminals, and in many cases it is used as exactly that. This paper examines the lives of varied individual in four different cases in which tort law is used, and quite possibly abused. The Scenario Paper In any courtroom across the country, and more than likely, across the globe, a person can find the use of tort. Over the years, the governing bodies in tort law have transformed it from its common law origins. Tort, as with any law, is forever changing and evolving by the use of lawyers and judges, alike. Despite certain efforts for the reform of tort, it is still difficult to overlook the use of modern torts and fail to see the convoluted system of rules and laws covering the main purpose of tort law. According to the Cornell University Law School website (2010, para. 4), “torts fall into three general categories: intentional torts (e.g., intentionally hitting a person); negligent torts (e.g., causing an accident by failing to obey traffic rules); and strict liability torts (e.g., liability for making and selling defective products).” This paper will examine a few of these types of torts and their possible outcomes. Scenario One In scenario one, there are several intentional and unintentional tort actions that are displayed. The torts that clearly stand out are battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress...
Words: 1760 - Pages: 8
...Synopsis of Tort Cases Paper Introduction Monica Bertrand The purpose of this paper will be for Team B to analysis two scenarios and decide what tort actions were found in the two scenarios that we chose. The scenario’s that were chosen by team B is scenario two and four. Within this paper we will discuss what tort actions were found in each scenario, and decide who are the plaintiffs, and defendants. In this paper we will discuss the elements of the tort claim and how it constitutes the plaintiff’s claim and how it can be resolved. My portion for team paper bullets one through three Monica Bertrand In scenario two the setting is in an Italian restaurant where the owner will be sued for negligence. The tort action for starters would be negligence. Tort is a word that means wrong done, that an individual has committed knowingly or not or by strict liability. The plaintiff has a right to monetary gain for damages inflicted while the tort was committed. According to Cheese man 2010, “Tort laws provide remedial compensation for damages. Segment of tort laws includes intentional torts against persons, negligence found under unintentional torts, special negligence doctrines for professionals, and strict liability and product liability for manufacturers”. Within scenario two Anna along with the old lady and the customers that were trying to leave the restaurant are the plaintiff’s. Anna can sue the restaurant owner for negligence, because glass was found in her...
Words: 422 - Pages: 2
...Abstract This paper will identify the various degrees of legal protection BUG must acquire for its intellectual property. Explanation of intentional conflict of law that may affect potential civil liability of Steve and WIRETAP will be discussed along with additional legal issues that may also affect BUG. The six different issues will reveal several torts violated and damages that may be awarded from BUG. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to explain specific, hypothetical scenarios dealing with several legal issues. Bug Inc. electronic products are assembled in foreign countries, currently the products are only distributed in U.S. mainly for the use in surveillance. BUG Inc. is planning to expand the electronic device distribution to international markets. Team C has provided detailed answers and feedback to the six scenarios and different types of legal protections BUG must have for its intellectual property, employment laws, international laws, imprisonment rights, internet law, responsibilities, and manufacturing problems associated with the company’s business dealing in domestic and international courts. These protections are elemental strategic plans allowing the organization to minimize any risks in the international distribution. The Trade Secrets Act has been adopted by many states to protect company’s trade secrets or intellectual property. BUG’s company as designer and manufacturer of electronic devices and own software is protected under the law...
Words: 1980 - Pages: 8
...Synopsis of Tort Cases Paper A synopsis is a summary of the text or subject, and in each scenario there are tort actions that need to be identify, and to make out who are the plaintiffs and defendants in these scenario cases. We will explain which claim got resolved by taking legal actions for the reason’s they were put in these different dangerous situations that could have been avoided. Scenario One Scenario one deals with intentional tort, unintentional torts and strict liability tort. The first intentional tort is the battery by Daniel on Malik for accidently spilling cold beer on his son Ruben. Daniel shoved Malik which caused him to fall. Malik tried to break his fall and grabs the railing which didn’t support the weight of Malik. The railing broke and Malik hit the steps and knocked out two of his front teeth. This will fall under strict liability tort. Malik can file a law suit against the owners of the football stadium for not ensuring the railing was safe for everyone in the stadium. This fall under product liability “The liability of manufacturers, sellers, and others for the injuries caused by defective products.” Cheeseman (2010). “Defamation of character false statement(s) made by one person about another. In court, the plaintiff must prove that (1) the defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff and (2) the statement was intentionally” Cheesesman (2010). Daniel can suit the woman in court for intentionally making...
Words: 1989 - Pages: 8
...Learning Outcomes This week students will: 1. Examine the elements of negligence and tort liability. 2. Compare appropriate punishment for corporations that commit crimes with appropriate punishment for persons who commit crimes that harm businesses. 3. Apply consumer protection law to a business situation. Introduction This week focuses on study of torts, criminal law, and consumer protection law (specifically, product liability). These are each different substantive areas of law that are relevant to business and business persons. Students will distinguish between criminal law and torts, including negligence and intentional torts. Students will also compare the differences between corporations that commit crimes and persons who commit crimes that harm businesses, and they will take a position regarding which presents the greatest threat to civil society, using current events to support their positions. In addition, students will also consider product liability arising from poorly regulated imports, and the impact of potential liability on U.S. companies. Students will also consider product recalls as a preemptory measure to mitigation liability. Students will identify and discuss the elements of negligence and a consumer protection statute. By the end of Week Two, students should understand the difference between crimes and torts, between negligence and intentional torts, and how the issue of product liability impacts businesses and consumers. Required Resources ...
Words: 924 - Pages: 4
...Synopsis of Tort of Cases Paper Synopsis of Tort Cases A tort is the French word for wrong. There are three categories of torts which are intentional torts, unintentional torts, and strict liability. Tort law is basically what protects different types of injuries that arise from the different torts. Many lawsuits that are done use many of the different torts to look for monetary gain, or tort damages. Tort damages are basically monetary damages that are sought from the offending party (Cheese man, p. 95.para.2). There have been many scenarios that have brought up different tort damages. Sometimes there are just one specific situation tha starts the tort cases. As the following scenario is reviewed that different tort actions are described, the potential plaintiffs are identified, and the elements of the tort claim that constitute the plaintiff’s claim and how the facts conform to those elements are described. Tort laws provide remedial compensation for damages. Segments of tort laws included intentional torts against persons, negligence found under unintentional torts, special negligence doctrines for professionals, and strict liability and product liability for manufactures (Cheeseman, 2010). Under each tort segment are violations with descriptive terms to provide details of offenses. I an individual believe a wrongful event has occurred; the individual has the right to file a civil lawsuit against the wrongdoer. This type of lawsuit can be some with or without the aid of an...
Words: 1273 - Pages: 6
...was kept away from her family except when it was convenient for her spouse. I do not think that a person could be committed today based on the evidence given in this case. Apparently, she became mentally ill when she filed for divorce. 3. How should these kinds of cases be handled today? If a person is in danger of harming themselves or others, all of the events should be documented so there is a trail of events. Depending on how bad or life threatening the event is, they may involuntarily commit the person and remain in constant contact with the family. How can intentional torts arise in the healthcare field? Be sure to provide specific examples. Intentional torts are intentional actions that result in harm to the plaintiff. The harm need not be intended, but the act must be intentional, not merely careless or reckless. Most intentional torts are also crimes. The classic intentional tort in medical practice is forcing unwanted medical care on a patient. The care may...
Words: 2342 - Pages: 10
...Synopsis of Tort Cases In this paper, you will find synopsizes of four tort cases. Each scenario will include the type of tort actions in the case, potential plaintiffs and defendants, elements of the tort claim that constitute the plaintiff’s claim as well as any defenses that the defendant may assert. Additionally, you will find the writer opinion as to how they believe the claim will be resolved along with the legal reasons for their belief. Scenario One The torts actions, elements, potential plaintiffs, defendants, and claim resolution arise from a series of actions that took place at a football game. Daniel and his son Ruben, age 8, go to a football game. The quarterback drops back to throw a pass, and is hit by an opposing player, breaking the quarterback’s arm, and sending the ball into the stands, injuring a fan. Malik jumps up to yell at the referee, spilling his cold beer on Ruben. Daniel is upset to see Ruben’s enjoyment spoiled this way, and shoves Malik. As Malik falls, he grabs onto the railing, which gives way under his weight. Malik’s face hits the aisle steps, knocking out two of his front teeth. On their way out, Daniel stops at the concession stand to buy two diet soft drinks. A lady standing in line at the concession stand smells the beer on Ruben, and she starts yelling at Daniel, accusing him of giving beer to a child. She makes a huge scene, and several customers cast disgusted glances toward Daniel. One of them is Daniel’s boss...
Words: 3434 - Pages: 14
... [edit] Categories Torts may be categorized in several ways: one such way is to divide them into Negligence, Intentional Torts, and Quasi-Torts. The standard action in tort is negligence. The tort of negligence provides a cause of action leading to damages, or to relief, in each case designed to protect legal rights, including those of personal safety, property, and, in some cases, intangible economic interests. Negligence actions include claims coming primarily from car accidents and personal injury accidents of many kinds, including clinical negligence, worker's negligence and so forth. Product liability cases, such as those involving warranties, may also be considered negligence actions, but there is frequently a significant overlay of additional lawful content. Intentional torts include, among others, certain torts arising from the occupation or use of land. The tort of nuisance, for example, involves strict liability for a neighbor who interferes with another's enjoyment of his real property. Trespass allows owners to sue for entrances by a person (or his structure, such as an overhanging building) on their land. Several intentional torts do not involve land. Examples include false imprisonment, the tort of unlawfully arresting or detaining someone, and defamation (in some jurisdictions split into libel and slander), where false information is broadcast and damages the plaintiff's reputation. In some cases, the development of tort law has spurred lawmakers...
Words: 3153 - Pages: 13
...Synopsis of Tort Cases Paper Matt Howze, Kim Woodard, Anthony Fennell, Mario Hauser, Mike Anson BUS/415 Mrs. Pamela Weddell June 12, 2011 Introduction Throughout this reading, we have evaluated several scenarios and made legal decisions based on the information that we know and the information that we have learned in the previous chapters. Our goal is to determine the tort actions seen in the scenarios identify potential plaintiffs, identify potential defendants, why they are defendants, the elements of the tort claims that constitute the plaintiffs’ claims, any defenses that the defendants may assert, and how the case will be resolved with legal reasoning. Scenario 1 What tort actions do you see? Intentional: Assault is the threat of immediate harm or offensive contact or any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of eminent of harm. Battery an unauthorized and harmful or offensive physical contact with another person Duress/distress a person whose extreme an outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly cause severe emotional distress to another person is liable for that emotional distress. Defamation false statement made by one person about another in court the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made an untrue statement of fact about the plaintiff. Also the statement was intentionally or accidentally published to a third party. Slander oral defamation of character Unintentional torts: Negligence a doctrine that says a person is liable for...
Words: 1738 - Pages: 7
...Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk Plan A business, whether for or not for profit, in this country, is regulated under guidelines known to us as laws. These laws hold business leaders accountable for conducting business in an ethical manner and protect consumers from negligent practices imposed by a business. An example of these laws is Tort Law, which is a law that provides compensation for tortuous acts to an injured party or party’s property through a civil lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Tort, defined as “a wrong”, is categorized by two components: Negligence Torts and Intentional Torts. The issue of a tort violation is a matter of the plaintiff proving his or her case or the defendant establishing a reasonable doubt that dismantles the plaintiff’s case. By using Alumina, Inc. as a point of reference, this paper will address how regulatory risks are identified and how they can be managed though preventive, detective and corrective measures. It will also concentrate on the torts and risks identified in the simulation and develop a plan that recognizes and minimizes the regulatory risks in this week’s simulation as well as those examined throughout the chapters in this week’s readings. Alumina, Inc., a four billion dollar United States based aluminum maker located along the borders of Lake Dira in Erehwon, is a manufacture of packaging materials, automotive components, bauxite mixing, alumina refining and aluminum smelting. It operates in eight countries...
Words: 1059 - Pages: 5
...HSA515 February/1/2011 Healthcare Policy Law and ethics Abstract The Snow Storm Lawsuit is a case of Negligence, Duty to act, and wrongful death. This paper will explain the legal, ethical and professional considerations. The Chief Executive Officer of a small non-profit community hospital were on vacation in the Bahamas, the are was hit by a large snow storm, in this case, many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it to work, as a result. This paper will explain how the employees reacted, and how the patients ethically, legally and professional suffered from the unexpected incident. While the Chief Executive officer of a small non-profit community hospital was vacationing in the Bahamas, the area was hit by a large snow storm. Many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it in to work, 3-11 and 11-7 shifts. As a result the patients units were understaffed and days shift personnel were required to remain on duty until relieved. During this snow storm, several patients sustained minor injuries from falls out of their bed, and one patient died after being given the wrong medication, the nurse on duty also left the hospital to go to Wendy’s to buy dinner, after one year, the families of these patients sued the hospital on the behalf of their deceased relatives. The three legal considerations are, during the snow storm, many of the hospital health care providers were unable to make...
Words: 1140 - Pages: 5
...Actual damages. An intentional tort is one where the tortfeasor was willful in bringing about a particular event that caused harm to another party. Negligence is an accidental (without willful intent) event that caused harm to another party. The difference between the two is the mind-set and intent of the tortfeasor. I will describe an example of negligence and an intentional tort. I was at the swimming pool with some of my friends and one of them accidentally spilled a small amount of baby oil on the deck area next to the pool. I didn’t see the spill until I stepped into it and went skidding about three feet across the deck. Luckily, I didn’t get hurt, but my friends all laughed about it and said I had a really scared look on my face. Now this incident was clearly a result of negligence. The next part of the story is more disturbing. My friends thought it would be even funnier to get two more bottles of baby oil and pour them all over the deck and video record people unknowingly walking across the slippery deck, and all in the hopes of getting a laugh watching someone slip and fall. I cringed but didn’t say anything as the first victim walked right into the trap. This was a pretty big guy, so when he slipped, he went down hard. I’m pretty sure that at one point his feet were actually higher than his head. He landed with a loud thud, but got up and walked away rubbing his shoulder where he landed on it. Now this was nothing less than an intentional tort. Strict liability applies...
Words: 445 - Pages: 2
