Free Essay

Interrogatory

In:

Submitted By wravneet
Words 746
Pages 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NO. C126447
HAROLD BENNETT,
Plaintiff,

vs. INTERROGATORIES SOUTH WESTERN HOSPITAL
Defendant.

TO: DEFENDANT, SOUTH WESTERN HOSPITAL
TO: JOHN DONG

Under the authority of Rule 33 of the (Title of Rules), Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, request that Defendant, answer, in writing and under oath, within 30 days of receipt hereof, the interrogatories hereinafter set forth.

DEFINITIONS

1. "COMPLAINT" shall mean and refer to Plaintiff's complaint originally filed on 08-10-15 in Department XVII of the Santa Clara County District Court, Case No. C126447.
2. "PROPERTY" shall mean and refer to the real property owned by the Defendant.
3. "YOU", "YOUR", "YOURS", and/or "DEFENDANT" shall mean and refer to as well as, his agents, attorneys, employees, accountants, family members, investigators, or any other person acting on his behalf.

INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY NO. 1:

Describe in detail the number of employees and each employee’s job duties on the date of the incident in this case.

INTERROGATORY NO. 2:

Identify any warning, caution, "wet floor", or other relevant signs that were displayed in the area where the incident occurred, including their verbiage, size and exact location.

INTERROGATORY NO. 3:

Please provide the full name, title, address and phone number of each employee present in the building at the time of this incident.

INTERROGATORY NO. 4:

Prior to this incident, when was the last time the floor area where the incident occurred was washed or sanitized? Please provide the approximate date and time as well as the name of the individual(s) responsible for such cleaning.

INTERROGATORY NO. 5:

To your knowledge, did anyone see Mr. Bennett fall? INTERROGATORY NO. 6:

Please state the name, address and job title of any employee from whom Plaintiff asked for assistance after his fall on June 1, 2015.

INTERROGATORY NO. 7:

Please state the name, address and job title of each employee or agent of defendant who is directly above or supervisory to Kevin Porter.

INTERROGATORY NO. 8:

Identity any document written, created, filed in, produced, or utilized to document the slip and fall incident suffered by Plaintiff on June 1, 2015.

INTERROGATORY NO. 9:

Please state the name, address and job title of any employee or agent of this Defendant who came to Plaintiff's aid after he slipped and fell June 1, 2015.

INTERROGATORY NO. 10:

Please state the name, address, and job title of any person who prepared any documentation regarding the slip and fall suffered by Plaintiff on June 1, 2015.

INTERROGATORY NO. 11:

Please state, at the time Plaintiff reported that he had fallen on June 1, 2015 what his condition was, including whether he was able to stand, or walk without assistance.

INTERROGATORY NO. 12:

State whether any policy or policies of insurance exist which may provide coverage to this Defendant for any liability, which may arise as a result of the incident referred to in Plaintiff's Petition.

INTERROGATORY NO. 13:

State the name and address of the Insurer.

INTERROGATORY NO 14:

State the policy number and amount of liability insurance coverage afforded by each such policy.

INTERROGATORY NO. 15:

Identify each retained expert witness, including employees of the Defendant, whom you expect to call at trial to provide expert witness testimony.

INTERROGATORY NO. 16:

State full address, occupation, place of employment and qualification of each such expert witness.

INTERROGATORY NO. 17:

Attach a copy of expert's curriculum vitae.

INTERROGATORY NO. 18:

Was any employee to agent of this Defendant disciplined or reprimanded in any way or terminated as a result of slip and fall incident suffered by Plaintiff on June 1, 2015?

INTERROGATORY NO. 19:

Other than the incident that is the subject matter of this lawsuit, have any other slip and/or fall incident occurred at the location of this accident, within the past five years? If so, please provide the date, parties name, nature of the incident and lawsuit information (if any) regarding each such incident.

INTERROGATORY NO. 20:

Please list the names of all the directors and human resource personnel of this Defendant. DATED this 15 day of September, 2015.

JOSEPH ASTOR
Bar No: 98354
3591 Oracle Circle
San Jose, California
Attorneys for Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that on this 15 day of September, 2015, I placed a true and correct copy of the foregoing INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to counsel on the attached service list: Mary Smith An employee of JOSEPH ASTOR

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Civil Litigation Interrogatories

...----------------- NOTICE OF SERVICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the undersigned, Elise Smith, Esquire, did prepare Defendants, Lewis E. Olson and Albert Dobiash's Interrogatories to answer. Same were served on counsel by regular mail in accordance with the attached mailing affidavit. SMITH & ASSOCIATES By: ________________________ Elise Smith, Esquire #173 Attorney for Plaintiff, Wolf 750 South Madison St., Suite 400 Friendship, Wisconsin (434)876-5432 INTERROGATORY DIRECTIONS: (1) Responding Party. The interrogatories must be answered: (A) by the party to whom they are directed; or (B) if that party is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who must furnish the information available to the party. (2) Time to Respond. The responding party must serve its answers and any objections within 30 days after being served with the interrogatories. A shorter or longer time may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered by the court. (3) Answering Each Interrogatory. Each interrogatory must, to the extent it is not objected to, be answered separately and fully in writing under oath. (4) Objections. The grounds for objecting to an interrogatory must be stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the court, for good cause, excuses the failure. (5) Signature. The person...

Words: 740 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Interrogatories for a Home Inspector

...IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ADAMS COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN CONSTANCE WOLF, f/k/a CONSTANCE WOLFGRAM Plaintiff, v. INTERROGATORIES Civil Action No. ________ LEWIS E. OLSON ALBERT DOBIASH (Note Send the Interrogatories separate) Defendants. In accordance with Rules _____________________________ of the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedures, Plaintiff requires that you answer the following Interrogatories in writing and under oath. DEFINITIONS As used herein below, the following words have the meaning hereafter set forth: 1. “Defendant”, “you”, and “your” refer to the party or parties to whom these Interrogatories are directed and all other persons acting on behalf of such party, including, but not limited to, attorneys and their associates, investigators, agents, employees, representatives, and others who are in possession of or who may have obtained information for or on your behalf of this answering party. 2. “Plaintiff” means Constance Wolf, f/k/a Constance Wolfgram. 3. “Document” is used herein in its broader sense to mean every document or other tangible thing, including without limitation the following items, whether printed, typed, recorded, photographed, filmed or reproduced by any process namely: agreements, letters, memoranda, records, reports, contracts, agreements, expense accounts, business records, notes, reports, photographs, and/or summaries of investigations, and any other information containing papers, writings or physical things...

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gayle Stewart Trucking Company Case Study

...Plaintiff(s) v. Gayle Stewart Trucking Company Defendant(s) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2017-92343 INTERROGATORIES Assigned to the Honorable JOSEPH CANTON TO: Plaintiff Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, Alice Bates, et al hereby demands that Gayle Stewart Trucking Company answer in writing and under oath within 40 days from the receipt hereof the following Interrogatories: FIRST SET OF UNIFORM INTEROGATTORIES TO PLAINTIFF INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE A. All information is to be divulged which is in the possession of the individual or corporate party, his attorneys, investigator, agents, employees,...

Words: 1806 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Natal Hatter V. Smart Deal Case Summary

...Hatter v. REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES Index No: _101__ Defendant: Smart Deal, Inc. _________________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff requests that Defendant respond to the following interrogatories separately and fully in writing and under oath, pursuant to statute 2030 of the Virginia Code Of...

Words: 1042 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethical Dilemma

...IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF Illinois Justin King, Plaintiff vs. Anheuser-Busch, Defendant Civil Action No. 12345 PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, Plaintiff hereby submits the following Interrogatories to Defendant. Plaintiff requests that Defendant serve its answers, in writing and under oath, to the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff at 262 Millers Ridge, Lebanon Junction, Kentucky 40150, within 30 days of service of these Interrogatories. For the purpose of these Interrogatories only, Plaintiff has used the definitions set forth below. Interrogatories 1. State your company's annual/monthly/quarterly maintenance records/requirements for all of your trucks. 2. State your company's policies as far as far as length of time that a driver can be on the road. Can you provide a copy of the drivers log? 3. State your companies accident reports and insurance policies and procedures in regards to your trucks that are on the road delivering daily. 4. State any conversations that you had with police officers about the accident, including: a. The date, time, and place of each conversation. b. What your driver stated to each officer/paramedic, attending physicians, if you cannot remember the exact words, state them as you remember. c. What each officer/attending physicians recited or said to you verbatim or what you remember. 5. State all of...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Business Law Questions

...Appellate courts do not hear testimony of witnesses or attempt to determine which of the witnesses who testified at trial should have been believed. Determining the credibility of the witnesses is the job of the trier of fact. Appellate courts review the trial record, motions, and evidentiary exhibits. True False A Demurrer would be the appropriate pre-trial motion to file if the complaint did not state a valid cause of action (valid claim) even if all the allegations contained in the complaint were true. True False Identify which, if any, of the underlying occur during the informal discovery phase of a lawsuit: Depositions Interrogatories The actual trial Both A & B None of the above One of the types of pleadings that Defendants file in response to the plaintiff’s complaint is called the answer (which is also referred to as the response). True False Identify which, if any, of the below circumstances can occur as a result of an appeal: The appellate court can reverse the trial court The appellate court can affirm the trial court The appellate court can remand the case to the trial court Any of the above Does it ever occur in a lawsuit that the defendant stipulates to the plaintiff’s factual allegations? Yes No The quantum of evidence required for a verdict in a civil case is identical to the quantum of evidence required for a conviction in a criminal case. True False The jury hears the evidence presented at trial and decides the facts that...

Words: 1809 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Complaint

...UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: ______________________ _________________________________________ x NELLY HARRISON. Plaintiff, v. HUNTER BECK d/b/a/ BECK INTERNATIONAL Defendants. _________________________________________x PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF RULE 26.1(g) INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS Nelly Harrison propounds the following interrogatories upon Hunter Beck Operating As Beck International and requests that they be answered separately, fully and under oath within thirty (30) days of service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 and Local Rule 26.1(g). DEFINITIONS (a) The words “you,” “yours” and/or “yourselves” means Beck International and any directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives or other persons acting, or purporting to act, on behalf of Beck International. (b) The singular shall include the plural and vice versa; the terms “and” or “or” shall be both conjunctive and disjunctive; and the term “including” mean “including without limitation”. (c) “Date” shall mean the exact date, month and year, if ascertainable or, if not, the best approximation of the date (based upon relationship with other events). (d) The word “document” shall mean any writing, recording, electronically stored information or photograph in your actual or constructive possession, custody, care or control, which pertain directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, either...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Legal Civil Procedures

...Texas State Supplement to Accompany Civil Litigation 7E Peggy N. Kerley Joanne Banker Hames, J.D. Paul A. Sukys, J.D., Ph.D. Prepared by Peggy N. Kerley Updated in 2013 by Jennifer Carpenter Australia • Brazil • Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom • United States i © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. ii PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................iv PART I INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL LITIGATION CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 Litigation and the Paralegal..................................................................................................................1 The Courts and Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................2 PART II INITIATING LITIGATION CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 7 Preliminary Considerations and Procedures.......................................................................................9 Investigation and Evidence .................................................................................................................10 The Complaint...............................................................................................................................

Words: 31166 - Pages: 125

Free Essay

Business Law

...cannot be applicable in non-legal contexts. So substantive law underlines the essential substance of a trial. Procedural law provides the machinery to enforce the substantive laws on the government bodies. It comprises the rules by which a court hears and determines what happens in civil or criminal proceedings. It deals with the method by which substantive law is made and administered. Procedural law has no independence and can be applicable in non-legal contexts. It only tells how the legal process to be executed by giving a step-by-step action. Question Two: During the discovery phase, the parties resort to the use of interrogatories, depositions, admission requests and document production requests. Briefly define these different discovery tools and explain the purpose for each. Explain the purpose of discovery as you understand it. Interrogatories are a formal set of written questions directed by one litigant and required to be answered by the other party and are used for the purpose of clarifying and narrowing the issues or the facts and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented at trial in the case. Deposition is the oral testimony of a witness by the lawyers outside the court and is used for the purpose of narrowing the issues, gathering information for the trail and also shortening the trail by making decision on the knowledge in advance. Admission Request is one party’s written demand that the other party admit or deny certain statements of supposed...

Words: 490 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Paralegal Studies

...firms to increase their earnings. Paralegal is a highly demand profession which makes me reflect that litigation practice is a rewarding career. 2. As a paralegal what documents should you attempt to obtain before a lawsuit is filed during the informal fact-gathering stage? What sources are available to you to locate these documents? The attorney’s work product, now called “trial preparation materials.” Trial preparation materials include any “documents and tangible things” that were “prepared in anticipation of litigation” by another party or that party’s “representative.” It is only a “qualified privilege” and based upon a showing of “substantial need.” Discovery should be carried out in the following order: 1. Interrogatories 2. Requests to produce and subpoenas 3. Depositions...

Words: 3519 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Information and Services

...ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007 Remedial Law SUMMER REVIEWER 3. Special Proceedings – remedy by which a party seeks to establish a status, a right, or a particular fact. CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIONS (A) As to nature ORDINARY ACTION Governed by rules. CIVIL ordinary SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION Also governed by ordinary rules but SUBJECT to specific rules prescribed (Rules 62 to 71). Special features not found in ordinary civil actions. RULE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Title of the Rules The Rules of Court are not penal statutes. They cannot be given retroactive effect. They can, however, be made applicable to cases pending at the time of their passage and therefore are retroactive in that sense. Under the 1987 Constitution, the rule-making power of the Supreme Court has the following limitations: 1. It must provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases; 2. Uniform for all courts of the same grade; and 3. Shall not diminish, increase or modify substantive rights (Art: VIII Section 5[5]). Section 2. In what courts applicable Section 3. Cases governed ACTION CLAIM An ordinary suit in a A right possessed by one court of justice. against another. One party prosecutes The moment said claim is another for the filed before a court, the enforcement or claim is converted into an protection of a right or action or suit. QuickT the prevention or redress ime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. of...

Words: 40805 - Pages: 164

Free Essay

State of Confusion Paper

...initial plaintiff’s argument or case against the other party, also known as the defendant. This allows the defendant to have knowledge of the plaintiff’s facts amid legal grounds of their claims. At times when suing another party they may arise to suing you back, if in that case such a situation occurs, you will then fight back in court while also trying to defend yourself. Then a counterclaim can be filed by the defendant if they have an independent claim against the plaintiff. The second stage is Discovery. This includes depositions which entails the parties of deposing or interviewing under oath before the start of the trial. There are a few types discovery. One is written discovery which has its own two forms; Interrogatories and Requests for admission. Interrogatories are the questions that in your own version of the claims. Requests of admission mainly ask the party to deny or admit to the facts stated in the claim. Penalties can come about if not answered, or answered if false manner. Discovery can also include subpoenas from the court ordering individuals or organizations to produce certain documentation, interview under oath, or answer any written questions which would be the second form of discovery. The third is depositions. This involves a court reporter transcribing your sworn statement from the questions asked by the attorney/s. The third stage is Motions. This is an application or a request to the court regarding or asking for a ruling. This includes different types...

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Thinking Critically About Ethics

...Graded Project Thinking Critically About Ethics By Mike Wilson, Esq. Reviewed by Brian Bastyr, Esq. All terms mentioned in this text that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Use of a term in this text should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. About the Author Mike Wilson is a freelance writer and college instructor who has had wide legal and educational experience. He graduated with his Bachelor of Arts degree in English from the University of Kentucky in 1976, and three years later received his law degree from the same school. He has been a partner in a law firm, a solo practitioner, and has done work in General and Family Mediation. He has also been a fulltime instructor in Paralegal Studies at Sullivan College, Kentucky. He was given the “Teacher of the Year” award in 1997. Mr. Wilson has published a number of papers on law-related topics in scholarly and popular journals. About the Reviewer Brian Bastyr is a senior attorney editor for West Group, a legal publishing company. He earned a bachelor’s degree at the University of Illinois, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Illinois College of Law. He is currently a member of the Illinois bar, and has published a number of articles in legal journals. Copyright © 2000 by Penn Foster, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any...

Words: 3548 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Fggggggggg

...United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Reports - NORDMANN v. NATIONAL HOTEL COMPANY, 425 F.2d ... Page 1 of 7 NORDMANN v. NATIONAL HOTEL COMPANY, 425 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1970) Mary LeBlanc NORDMANN, wife of/and Ervin A. Nordmann, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NATIONAL HOTEL COMPANY, d/b/a The Jung Hotel et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 26894. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 19, 1970. Page 1104 Ashton R. Hardy, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellants. Phillip A. Wittmann, David L. Stone, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellees. Before RIVES, BELL and DYER, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge: Mr. and Mrs. Nordmann sued the National Hotel Company for damages which resulted from a robbery and assault committed upon them in a Jung Hotel room in New Orleans between 12:10 A.M. and 1:10 A.M. on October 18, 1965. The Nordmanns, accompanied by a friend and business associate, William Mixon, registered into the hotel as paying guests the previous afternoon. That evening, with several other friends, they attended a ball in the hotel ballroom. The hotel contains some twelve hundred guest rooms, and there were some twelve to fourteen hundred people at the ball. Shortly after midnight, when the Nordmanns left the ball and started up to their room, they entered a self-serving, automatic type elevator. They were followed by the man who later robbed and assaulted them. When they left the elevator they did not notice that this man followed until Mr. Nordmann put...

Words: 4404 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Rubric

...RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNED CASE PRESENTATIONS AND PAPERS 1. Each student will be assigned a case from the end-of-chapter cases in the text book. You are required to submit a paper on the case and to engage in an in-class discussion with the professor about the case. 2. The cases in the textbook are what lawyers call squibs. The squibs are short summaries of the case and not the full court opinion about the case. You will be able to do an internet search under the name of the case and find the full court opinion, which will have much more information than the squib in the textbook. 3. Using the information in the full case opinion, you will be required to do the following a. (up to 25 points) Submit a paper of 500 to 750 words on the case. The paper must treat the following areas: - what are the facts of the case? - what is the law that applies in this situation? - what is the issue? That is a statement of how the law applies to the facts of the case - discussion - make an argument that supports a particular outcome in the case. NOTE – you do not have to agree with the court’s opinion. Feel free to come to a different conclusion that the court did, if you think the law and facts support you. - state your conclusion. b. (up to 25 points) Be prepared to engage in an in-class discussion with the professor about this case. You should be very familiar with the law and facts and should NOT be referring to the textbook, the case or your notes during this discussion. The discussion will...

Words: 2774 - Pages: 12