Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession Ruth D. Hines
Article information:
To cite this document: Ruth D. Hines, (1989),"Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework Projects and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 Iss 2 pp. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132268 Downloaded on: 22 September 2014, At: 01:18 (PT) References: this document contains references to 0 other documents. To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 14644 times since 2006*
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
William E. Shafer, Yves Gendron, (2005),"Analysis of a failed jurisdictional claim: The rhetoric and politics surrounding the AICPA global credential project", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 Iss 4 pp. 453-491 Stephen P. Walker, Ken Shackleton, (1998),"A ring fence for the profession: advancing the closure of British accountancy 1957#1970", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 Iss 1 pp. 34-71 Sue Sheldon, (1999),"Responding to the Challenges of Change", Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 11 Iss 1/2 pp. 161-162
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 394654 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
This article has been cited by: 1. Deviraj Gill and, Anne BroderickBrand Heritage and CSR Credentials: A Discourse Analysis of M&S Reports 179-199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 2. Fábio Frezatti, David B. Carter, Marcelo F.G. Barroso. 2014. Accounting without accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 27:3, 426-464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 3. Ying Zhang, Jane Andrew. 2014. Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25:1, 17-26. [CrossRef] 4. Marion Davis, David Hay. 2012. An Analysis of Submissions on Proposed Regulations for Audit and Assurance in New Zealand. Australian Accounting Review 22:3, 303-316. [CrossRef] 5. Kevin Clarke, Jack Flanagan, Sharron O'Neill. 2012. Success in winning Australian Research Council grants as a measure of comparative professionalised disciplinary research activity. Pacific Accounting Review 24:1, 51-79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 6. Eva Heidhues, Chris PatelChapter 4 The Influence of Power and Legitimacy on German Attitudes Toward the IASB and the Promotion of Professional Judgments 75-122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 7. References 163-196. [Citation] [PDF] [PDF] 8. James Guthrie, Lee D. Parker. 2011. Reflections and projections. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 25:1, 6-26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 9. Crawford Spence, David Carter. 2011. Accounting for the General Intellect: Immaterial labour and the social factory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22:3, 304-315. [CrossRef] 10. Henri Guénin-Paracini, Yves Gendron. 2010. Auditors as modern pharmakoi: Legitimacy paradoxes and the production of economic order. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21:2, 134-158. [CrossRef] 11. William E. Shafer, Richard S. Simmons. 2008. Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21:5, 695-720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 12. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting and Business Research 37:1, 39-54. [CrossRef] 13. Lee D. Parker. 2007. Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting and Business Research 37:1, 59-61. [CrossRef] 14. Sylvain Durocher, Anne Fortin, Louise Côté. 2007. Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theorybuilding study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32:1-2, 29-59. [CrossRef] 15. Ngaire Kirk. 2006. Perceptions of the true and fair view concept: an empirical investigation. Abacus 42:2, 205-235. [CrossRef] 16. James Guthrie, Indra Abeysekera. 2006. Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new?. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting 10:2, 114-126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 17. Bradley N. Potter. 2005. Accounting as a social and institutional practice: perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus 41:3, 265-289. [CrossRef] 18. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The epistemology of macroeconomic reality: The Keynesian Revolution from an accounting point of view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28:5, 471-517. [CrossRef] 19. Tomo Suzuki. 2003. The accounting figuration of business statistics as a foundation for the spread of economic ideas. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28:1, 65-95. [CrossRef] 20. Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam, Juliet RoperApplying critical discourse analysis: Struggles over takeovers legislation in New Zealand 121-155. [Abstract] [Enhanced Abstract] [PDF] [PDF] 21. Fran M. Wolf, James A. Tackett, Gregory A. Claypool. 1999. Audit disaster futures: antidotes for the expectation gap?. Managerial Auditing Journal 14:9, 468-478. [Citation] [Full Text] [PDF] 22. Maria Cadiz Dyball, Lina J. Valcarcel. 1999. The “rational” and “traditional”: the regulation of accounting in the Philippines. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12:3, 303-328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 23. Jane Andrew. 1999. Measurement and Imperialism in the ‘New Millennium’. Pacific Accounting Review 11:1/2, 23-27. [Abstract] [PDF] 24. David Coy, Michael Pratt. 1998. An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11:5, 540-561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 25. John Innes, Tom Brown, David Hatherly. 1997. The expanded audit report ‐ a research study within the development of SAS 600. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:5, 702-717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 26. Tom Lee. 1995. The professionalization of accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8:4, 48-69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 27. Mark Shying. 1995. INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CULTURE AND ACCOUNTANTS' PERCEPTIONS OF PROFESSIONALISM. Asian Review of Accounting 3:2, 58-69. [Abstract] [PDF]
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
28. Timothy J. Fogarty, Mohamed E.A. Hussein, J. Edward Ketz. 1994. Political Aspects of Financial Accounting Standard Setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:4, 24-46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 29. Tom Lee. 1994. Financial Reporting Quality Labels. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:2, 30-49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 30. Irene Tutticci, Keitha Dunstan, Scott Holmes. 1994. Respondent Lobbying in the Australian Accounting Standard‐setting Process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7:2, 86-104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 31. Tony Tinker. 1991. The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16:3, 297-310. [CrossRef] 32. Robin Roslender. 1990. Sociology and management accounting research. The British Accounting Review 22:4, 351-372. [CrossRef]
Downloaded by UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA At 01:18 22 September 2014 (PT)
