Free Essay

Kant's Concept of Pure Reason

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By prateekkolhar
Words 2562
Pages 11
German Philosophy: Kant’s concept of reason
Critique of Pure Reason
Prateek S Kolhar (EE10B109) 29th April 2014

1. Introduction
During the period of enlightenment in Europe, there were 2 schools of thought that talked about the way we acquire knowledge: Rationalism and Empiricism. Rationalists like Leibniz claimed that knowledge is innate, that is, we are born with all the knowledge and the experiences that we have in this world just help us in uncovering/ remembering this knowledge. Empiricist believed that all knowledge is got only through experience in other words we are born with our minds/souls like a clean slate and the experiences write on them. With this struggle between the two schools of thought enlightenment Europe was striving to find ways to arrive at a consensus about some of these aforementioned central issues of theory of knowledge. And the champion of a philosopher who accomplished with task was Immanuel Kant. Kant borrowed many concepts from both empiricism and rationalism. But he felt that the many of the rationalist ideas were too simplistic and dogmatic and some of the empiricist ideas we too skeptic about the ability of humans to acquire true knowledge. As a part of his critical philosophy, with an aim to resolve this problem of theory of knowledge he wrote 3 critiques: Critique of pure reason, Critique of practical reason and Critique of judgment. Critique of Pure Reason talks about the process of knowledge acquisition in natural sciences, the way in which the structures of our mind influences what we understand about the world and the limitations of our understanding. In Critique of Practical Reason, he addresses the issues of moral judgment and preconditions of our minds to arrive at such judgments. Critique of Judgment talks about aesthetic judgment and attempts to unify pure natural sciences and ethics.

2. Critique of Pure Reason:
In the critique of pure reason, we understand a lot about what Kant’s idea of knowledge acquisition is and how the mind influences the very process of acquiring the percepts. It also talks about something called the pure reason and presents pure reason as a faculty to which other faculties of the mind are subordinated. He says that we receive the percepts from the world through our senses but theses percepts are influenced by the structures of our mind. These preconditions in some sense filter out some information

about the true world or the so called noumenal world. The world as we know through our senses is called the phenomenal world. He says that we cannot acquire knowledge about the noumenal world as we can’t experience it. It is like seeing through say red colored glass ever since we were born, we would not be able to conclude about the actual color of the real world (noumena) and the phenomenal world in this context would have just shades of red. Here he agrees with the model of knowledge acquisition of Hume, where he also talks about our senses deceiving us in being able to acquire knowledge about the true world. Unlike Hume, Kant never doubted the possibility of genuine knowledge. He tries to understand the way in which reason has arrived at some principles which it has long been in in the habit of acquiring knowledge. He says that true knowledge is possible but only about the phenomenal world and not the noumenal world. He also says that there are certain preconditions or a priori structures of the mind that influence the way we sense the world. And these preconditions of the mind are not got through experience; they are just a priori part of the mind. Here he is borrowing some concepts from the rationalists where they say knowledge is innate. Though he says that there are certain a priori concepts in our mind he disagrees with the rationalists with regards to having knowledge about everything already in our minds, when he says that the knowledge about the noumenal world is not possible. The critique of pure reason is divided into 3 parts: Transcendental Aesthetic- it talks about the problem of sensibility and several issues related to sense perception through the study of space and time as the a priori forms of perception. Transcendental Analytic: talks about problems related to the relating of various concepts got from the perceptions of the different objects in the world. It studies the means by which the mind categorizes data from the senses. Transcendental Dialectic: deals with reasoning, as it addresses issues related to inference from the concepts of our understanding and can be seen as “the study of the fallacious attribution of the objective reality to the perceptions of the mind of external objects”: what this means is that it tries to study the bad habit of the mind to conclude that the percepts received from the experiences give us the truth about the noumenal world.

2.1. Transcendental Aesthetic:
It talks about the factors that are absolutely necessary in perceiving things and there factors act as the preconditions of our mind in all possible perceptions. It deals with those preconditions that influence the sensory process but are not characteristics of any specific perception object. As these factors are preconditions and are not got from any experience that is they do not have any empirical origin, they are a priori and hence are also transcendental. It affirms the importance of intuition in receiving information of the world and says that intuition is the only way in which we can relate to the objects immediately. This section presents a faculty called the sensibility. Sensibility is the capacity of the mind to be able to receive representations of objects by being affected by them. The way we receive the information/percepts from the world is influenced by the structures/preconditions of our mind and these preconditions that influence the sensibility are the

notion of space and time. Space and time are called the forms of sensibility. They are not part of any object, they are part of the sensory process and we don’t really acquire this perception of space and time, it has been in use all the while and hence they have no empirical origin and hence are transcendental. Space and time have been affecting the precepts that we receive ever since we can remember; there was not a point in life where we didn’t know the spatial and temporal orientation of objects. We have never been able to think out of these constructs of time and space. We have never learnt about the notion of space and time through any particular experience; so we conclude that these so called forms of sensibility have been innate and are hence transcendental.

2.2. Transcendental Analytic:
This section of the critique addresses the next stage in the process of in acquiring knowledge that is the understanding and its relation with sensibility. While sensibility is the faculty of receiving the impressions of the objects in the world, understanding is the ability to produce concepts from the percepts and think of the objects in context. In some sense understanding is forming the imagery of objects in our minds. Transcendental analytic is concerned with the aspects of the a priori concepts or principles that govern our understanding and the application of these a priori concepts to the percepts that we receive from the sensibility. In simpler words it looks at the a priori concepts that the mind uses to synthesize the phenomenal world in the mind. Kant says that the act of understanding can be reduced to the act of judgment. He says that the mind in its unique process of judging is trying to unify different representations with the help of different concepts to form one final conclusion or cognition. In other words, judgments synthesize representations by means of concepts. Understanding tries to assimilate and relate different concepts and also unite there concepts to produce a new concept. Kant says that there are 12 categories of understanding and they actually stand for the possible ways in which the human mind synthesizes the concepts from the percepts it receives through sensations. And the broad categories of these 12 categories are quality, quantity, modality and relations. The different types of judgments have a close relation to these 12 categories of understanding. Quantity: unity, plurality and totality. Quality: reality, negation and limitation. Modality: possibility/impossibility, existence/non-existence and necessity/contingency. Relations: inherence & subsistence, causality & dependence and community.

2.3. Transcendental Dialectic:

Kant here critically analyses the ability of understanding and reason, the faculties of the mind to give us true knowledge about the noumenal world. Transcendental Dialectic gives an account on pure reason and how it influences understanding and the working of the mind as a whole. To understand the difference between “understanding” and “reason”, let’s look at their definition as per this critique. Understanding is the faculty concerned with actively producing knowledge through of concepts. Understanding is quite commonly attributed to being the mind itself. It produces logical perspective and compares different concepts with each other, and also to the empirical perspective (where it is also called judgment). This enables us to relate concepts with our intuition in order to produce phenomenal knowledge. For Kant, reason is both a logical and a transcendental faculty of the mind. As a logical faculty, it produces or rather directs the conclusions through abstractions of the concepts from the ‘understanding’, as a transcendental faculty. It creates conceptions and contains a priori ideas whose objective existence cannot be concluded empirically. Kant presents the transcendental ideas of pure reason as regulative concepts of the mind. Kant proposes that there are three regulative ideas that help us go further after the sensual experience of the objects in the world. He claims that our mind tries to unify the concepts that are there in the mind and these ideas are necessary in our attempt to unify the plurality/differences of our experiences. These transcendental ideas are: the self, the cosmos and the God. These ideas are transcendental because they do not correspond to any object of our direct experience. Kant suggests that they are not the result of intuition, but pure reason. He says that the human reason has a tendency to construct a totally unified, coherent and systematic world-view and the roots of this tendency lie in these ideas of reason.

2.3.1. Ideas of reason:

The self is the idea of a subject that is a unification of all experience, all powers of perception & thought. All the changes in this ‘self’ belong to one being and the activity of thought is devoid of the phenomena of the world. We cannot experience this ‘self’. It is in built in us. Even when we experience any object in the world it is already implied that the information/percept is experienced by this ‘self’. For example the statement “This is a pen”, already implies that, “I think” is appended to the statement, making it “I think this is a pen”. Since we cannot get any precepts about the ‘self’, it is a priori and hence transcendental. Pure reason also tries to create synthesize a unified collection infinitely long causal series of event in experience by forming the concept of the world or cosmos. Our mind likes to believe that all the events outside the self, form a long chain of connected events. Here it tries to unify all that the mind experiences as one entity that is the cosmos. The world cannot be experienced from the beginning to the end and hence cannot be experienced as a long causal series of related events. Hence as there is no percept to this concept, it is an in built idea in our mind and hence transcendental. The idea of God is the attempt of reason to unify our experience and everything else including the self and the cosmos into one entity. Kant says the idea of God is the transcendental ideal. This is because God is the perfect being to which everything connects to and all perfections are attributed to. Hence

God is treated as an ideal to which our thoughts and understanding aims to get unified into. To put forward his point that the idea of God is transcendental Kant says: “We have not the slightest ground to assume in an absolute manner the object of this idea…. It becomes evident that the idea of such a being, like all speculative ideas, seems only to formulate the command of reason, that all connection in the world be viewed in accordance with the principles of a systematic unity—as if all such connection had its source in one single all-embracing being as the supreme and sufficient cause.” Through these 3 ideas of reason our mind is constrained or inspired to reach to the virtual points of understanding that lie in these unifying concepts. Our mind tries to bring all the experience and thought and houses it under one roof and not as separate entities. This is probably why it is easier for us to understand things when we study them in a systematic manner connecting to a central topic or object. So to put forward his concept of knowledge, Kant chooses the middle ground between skeptical empiricism and dogmatic rationalism. He says that we cannot get knowledge about anything that is not given to us empirically and by this agrees with the empiricists to some extent. He says that the reason has a negative effect on the mind when it tries to apply the categories of understanding to prove the existence of these ideas of reason. Hence he warns us by saying that “concepts without percepts are empty. Percepts without concepts are blind”. Nevertheless, ideas produced by reason alone such as self, cosmos, and God can help us synthesize coherence to our experiences. However, Kant makes it clear that he disagrees with the rationalists who believed that these ideas corresponded to some objects whose existence could be proved. He says that these ideas govern our mind but to try to prove or disprove their existence is being foolish. He says: “…there is a great difference between something given to my reason as an object absolutely or merely as an object in the idea. In the former case our concepts are employed to determine the object [transcendental]; in the latter case there is in fact only a scheme for which no object, not even a hypothetical one, is directly give, and which only enables us to represent to ourselves other objects in an indirect manner, namely in their systematic unity, by means of their relation to this idea. Thus, I say, that the concept of a highest intelligence is a mere idea.” So the whole concept of sensibility, understanding, reason and theory of knowledge can be summarized in the following diagram:

Ideas of reason

Self

Cosmos

God

Pure Reason

True World / Noumena

Sensory process / Sensibility

Percepts

Mind / Understanding

Knowledge of the phenomenal world

concepts

concepts

Space and Time

12 categories of understanding

Fig: shows the relation between different components of the mind it producing the phenomenal knowledge from the noumenal world.

References
1. 2. 3. NPTEL lectures on European Philosophy: http://nptel.ac.in/syllabus/109106051/ Online course on Philosophy from the CSUN: http://www.csun.edu/~kdm78513/subjects/philosophy/ Stanford blog on philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-reason/

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Kant's Second Antinomy

...third transcendental antinomy specifically. The problems that Hegel finds with Kant's notion of freedom and necessity pave the way for his own philosophy to fill in the gaps. This section of the paper will focus on highlighting Hegel's criticism of Kant's third antinomy, which is based off of his general critique of the antinomies in addition to Kantian conceptions...

Words: 810 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

What Is Critical Junc

...Critique of Pure Reason's Transcendental Dialectic 3.2.1 The Ens Realissimum The Transcendental Dialectic's “Ideal of Reason” contains the best known and most frequently anthologized components of Kant's philosophy of religion. In addition to its portrayal of the ens realissimum, one finds within it Kant's objections to the Ontological, Cosmological and Physico-theological (Design) arguments for God's existence. It is thus the text most central to the negative elements of Kant's philosophy of religion and is integral to the widely held view that Kant is deeply hostile to faith. The general aim of the Transcendental Dialectic is to expose reason's excesses, its drive to move beyond the limits of possible experience, and to bring all concepts into a systematic unity under an “unconditioned condition.” The Transcendental Dialectic begins with a critique of reason's illusions and errors within the sphere of Rational Psychology. It then moves on to a critique of cosmological metaphysics, and then to the “Ideal of Reason” where Kant turns to Rational Theology and its pursuit of religious knowledge. As Kant explains, underlying all the traditional proofs for God's existence is the concept of the ens realissimum, the most real being. Reason comes to the idea of this being through the principle that every individuated object is subject to the “principle of complete determination.” While the generality of concepts allow them to be less than fully determined (e.g. our concept of a horse...

Words: 13468 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Social Issues

...“The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy,” Mark Timmons (ed.) Essays on Kant’s Moral Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000). The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy Allen Wood Yale University By the year 1768, Kant claimed to be at work on a system of ethics, under the title “metaphysics of morals” (Ak 10:74).[1] During the so-called ‘silent decade’ of the 1770s, when Kant was working on the Critique of Pure Reason, he promised repeatedly not only that he would soon finish that work but also that he would soon publish a “metaphysics of morals” (Ak 10:97, 132, 144).[2] Yet it was not until four years after the first Critique that Kant finally wrote a work on ethics, and even then he merely laid the ground for a metaphysics of morals by identifying and establishing the supreme principle on which a system of duties would be based (G 4:392). Three years later, in the Critique of Practical Reason Kant once again dealt entirely with foundational questions in moral philosophy. Kantian ethics is primarily known, especially among English-speaking philosophers, through these two ethical works of the 1780s, neither of which contains anything like a ‘metaphysics of morals’. Many of Kant’s chief works in the early 1790s are devoted to practical philosophy. The Critique of Judgment’s treatment of taste and teleology is concerned both with moral psychology and with the view of the world which a morally disposed person should take. Other works even...

Words: 10308 - Pages: 42

Free Essay

Kant Versus Hume

...Kant VS Hume David Hume works from world to mind, Immanuel Kant from mind to world. Hume, how we experience the world is conditioned by the world. Kant, how we experience the world is conditioned by the mind. Most contemporary philosophers believe that Hume refuted the views of the rationalists before him (Descartes, Hobbes Spinoza, and Leibniz), who all held that there is an element of genuine a priori reasoning in causal inference. According to Hume, however, causal relations are not logically necessary, and hence they cannot be known a priori. To say that even if A caused B, it is not logically impossible to suppose that, given A, B might not have occurred. (De Pierris) So far as reason and logic are concerned, given a particular event, anything may happen next. This is precisely the reason why causal relations cannot be known a priori; in order to determine whether or not a causal relation holds between A and B we must rely on our experience of similar relations. "There are no objects," wrote Hume, "which by the mere survey, without consulting experience; we can determine to be the causes of any other; and no objects, which we can certainly determine in the same manner not to be the causes" (Lorkowski) Hume analyzed the idea of causality by emphasizing the three demands that can be verified through observation. First he argued the aspect of constant conjunction. In this aspect, the cause and effect must be spatially and constantly existent. Secondly, he asserted that it...

Words: 971 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Material on Morality

...dignity of man’ and sciences reduction of human beings to ‘specks of dust’. His rejection of many Enlightenment philosophies and work to reconcile others resulted in the philosophies that rocketed philosophy far beyond the debate between rationalists and empiricists. I will explore Kant’s views on what knowledge is and what is possible to know, which I will then compare these views to those held by sceptics and dogmatists. Similarly, I will discuss how Kant’s deviating epistemology led to the formation of his categorical imperative and views on morality, contrasting this moral code to the ones of the Hellenistic schools of thought. Lastly, I will deliberate on how Kant’s categorical imperative is nonoperational with the 20th and 21st century’s understanding of psychology and quantum physics. Kant believed that our understanding of the external world was two-part, basing our knowledge not only on our sense-perception experiences but on a priori concepts as well. Kant’s two-part epistemology is not at all similar with the mind-body theories of reality proposed by many enlightenment thinkers. Kant’s epistemology is derived of his criticisms of those he labeled dogmatists and sceptics. Kant’s sceptics, like Hume, thought that there was nothing to...

Words: 2123 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Kant

...The Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, argues upon the basis of morality introducing the ideals of the categorical imperative as the central concept of moral philosophy. The definition of the categorical imperative leads Kant towards the critique of pure reason arguing that without a goodwill one can’t even be worthy of being happy. Kant introduces goodwill, treating people as means rather than ends and doing the right thing for the right reason. Making a distinction between science and knowledge and eliminating common sense on a route to the philosophical, Kant defines reason as reason a practical faculty to influence will and also being essential to will. Kant argument in the Groundwork focuses upon the basic idea of what makes a good person good. It is the possession of a will that is a way determined by, or makes decision based of moral law. This goodwill is supposed to be the idea of one who only makes decisions that she holds to be morally worthy, taking moral considerations in themselves to be conclusive reasons for guiding her behavior. This sort of disposition or character is something we all highly value. Kant believes we value it without limitation or qualification. Formulated by pure reason, the categorical imperative according to Kant underscores his argument. The value of a good will thus cannot be that it secures certain valuable ends, whether of our own or of others, since there value is entirely...

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Immanuel Kant and Hume, David

...funding initiative. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free Author & Citation Info | Friends PDF Preview | InPho Search | PhilPapers Bibliography Kant and Hume on Morality First published Wed Mar 26, 2008; substantive revision Sun Aug 12, 2012 The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) is often contrasted with that of David Hume (1711–1776). Hume's method of moral philosophy is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the necessity of grounding morality in a priori principles. Hume says that reason is properly a “slave to the passions,” while Kant bases morality in his conception of a reason that is practical in itself. Hume identifies such feelings as benevolence and generosity as proper moral motivations; Kant sees the motive of duty—a motive that Hume usually views as a second best or fall back motive—as uniquely expressing an agent's commitment to morality and thus as conveying a special moral worth to actions. Although there are many points at which Kant's and Hume's ethics stand in opposition to each other, there are also important connections between the two. Kant shared some important assumptions about morality and motivation with Hume, and had, early in his career, been attracted to and influenced by the sentimentalism of Hume and other British moralists. The aim of this essay is not to compare Hume and Kant on all matters ethical. Instead, we examine...

Words: 24372 - Pages: 98

Premium Essay

Immanuel Kant Determinism

...In Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason Immanuel Kant attempts to reconcile causal determinism on the one hand and human freedom on the other. Kant’s unique argument centers around a distinction between human reason, which originates spontaneously from itself with no previous cause, and its effect on the external world which always has a cause and is part of a causal chain of events. In essence human beings have the freedom to choose a response regardless of the effects of events in the external world. Kant presents cogent and comprehensive argument that is difficult to write off. I will argue in favor or Kant’s position as he does a masterful job in removing what appears to be an obvious contradiction of compatibilism. Kant identifies two forms of causality: causality via the laws of nature, or determinism and causality from freedom of will (Critique of Pure Reason, A532 / B560). Causality from nature is...

Words: 2020 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Epistemology In Western Philosophy

...This skepticism gives no foundation on knowledge, as not only knowledge cannot be derived by reason, but also senses experiences are not reliable – it often deceives us. Kant’s Transcendental Philosophy The mention of Kant’s epistemology is necessary as his idea is revolutionary. Since Descartes’ “Cogito, Ergo Sum”, modern philosophy has shifted its approach to subjectivity, and the trend reaches its peak in Kant’s philosophy. To what he called “Copernican Revolution” – from concerning the objectivity of knowledge to subject’s cognitive ability. In Kant’s view, human are not born as blank sheet, but was given the concept of time, space, causality, etc. The acquisition of knowledge is then possible under such a framework, where those concepts are stated under 4 categories of pure understanding. Kant attempted to look for a type of proposition that is informative and universal – to respond Hume’s view that what is universal is uninformative, and what is informative is not universal. In his work “critique of pure reason”, Kant made distinctions of two kinds of knowledge and judgements. The former is epistemological and the latter is...

Words: 1125 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

A Critique on Kant's Principle of Autonomy

...QUEEN OF APOSTLES PHILOSOPHY CENTRE JINJA (PCJ) CRITIQUE OF THE NOTION OF AUTONOMY IN KANT’S MORAL PHILOSOPHY AN UNDER GRADUATE DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF ETHICS AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF UGANDA MARTYRS UNIVERSITY (UMU) NKOZI, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN PHILOSOPHY BISIMWA MUNYALI EVARISTE MARCH 2011 1 DEDICACE This work is dedicated in a special way to: My ever loving and caring God, My family and the community of the Missionaries of Africa. 2 DECLARATION I………………………………………………………..have read the rules of Uganda Martyrs University on plagiarism and hereby state that this work is my own. It has not been submitted anywhere else for any qualification. I have acknowledged the secondary sources used in this work. NAME OF STUDENT…………………………………………………………. SIGNATURE…………………………………………………………………… DATE: …………………………………………………………………………… SUPERVISOR………………………………………………………………….. SIGNATURE…………………………………………………………………… DATE: ………………………………………………………………………….. 3 ABSTRACT The importance of a philosophical study dealing with moral issues, especially the principle of autonomy is indisputably great. It is a common agreement that morality is located within the scope of duty. Kant corroborates this held agreement by stating the categorical imperative which every human is obliged to act upon. He conceived this categorical imperative as the moral law which all those who claim to be moral beings have to live on. However, he also affirmed...

Words: 21012 - Pages: 85

Premium Essay

John Stuart Mill vs. Immanuel Kant

...for our society than Immanuel Kant’s principle that it is better to do what's morally just. I will explain why Mill’s theory served as a better guide to moral behavior and differentiate between the rights and responsibilities of human beings to themselves and society. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral customs are formed. Immanuel Kant presented one perspective in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his skill to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another belief as presented in the book, Utilitarianism, which is seemingly conflicting with the thoughts of Kant. What is most unique about the ethics of morality is the idea of responsibilities to particular individuals. According to both Mill and Kant, moral obligations are not fundamentally particularistic because they are rooted in universal moral principles. Both philosophers have made great impacts in their niche areas in the field. An analysis of their theories may help develop a better understanding of them and their theories. Mill holds an empiricist theory while Kant holds a rationalist theory. Kant explains morality through forms that he believes are essential to free and sensible judgment. Mill’s utilitarian approach is a form of consequential theory because the rightness or wrongness of an act is determined by the outcomes. Kant’s ethics of duty is the foundation...

Words: 2175 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Kant's Categorical Imperative

...The Categorical Imperative Analyzing Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for A Metaphysics of Morals Anders Bordum WP 4/2002 January 2002 MPP Working Paper No. 4/2002 © January 2002 ISBN: 87-91181-06-2 ISSN: 1396-2817 Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy Copenhagen Business School Blaagaardsgade 23B DK-2200 Copenhagen N Denmark Phone: +45 38 15 36 30 Fax: +45 38 15 36 35 E-mail: as.lpf@cbs.dk www.cbs.dk/departments/mpp 2 The Categorical Imperative Analyzing Immanuel Kant's Grounding for a Metaphysics of Morals By Anders Bordum Keywords: Categorical imperative, discourse ethics, duty, ethics, monologic, dialogic, Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas, self-legislation, self-reference. 3 Abstract In this article I first argue that Immanuel Kant’s conception of the categorical imperative is important to his philosophy. I systematically, though indirectly, interconnect the cognitive and moral aspects of his thinking. Second, I present an interpretation of the Kantian ethics, taking as my point of departure, the concept of the categorical imperative. Finally, I show how the categorical imperative is given a dialogical interpretation by Jürgen Habermas in his approach, usually referred to as discourse ethics. I argue that the dialogical approach taken by discourse ethics is more justifiable and therefore more usefuli. I The Synthesis of Rationalism and Empiricism The philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is in the main inspired...

Words: 10855 - Pages: 44

Free Essay

Compare Kant’s Theory of Transcendental Idealist Space with That If One of the Philosophers (Newton/Clarke) That Kant Claims Have a Transcendental Realist Conception of Space. Which Conception If Space Is More True and Why?

...Compare Kant’s theory of transcendental idealist space with that if one of the philosophers (Newton/Clarke) that Kant claims have a transcendental realist conception of space. Which conception if space is more true and why? The ontological nature of space is one of the fundamental questions in Kant’s metaphysics and is the foundation around which he constructs his notion of transcendental idealism laid out in his Critique of Pure Reason. Written in response to the previous ‘realist’ conceptions of space Kant challenged strongly the view of its ultimate reality and served to shift the scope of the ontological argument from one of ‘absolutism’ versus ‘relationalism’ to a more developed debate of ‘realism’ against ‘idealism’ as he brought the relationship between space and time, and the mind strongly to the fore. In this essay I am going to contrast this Kantian notion of space as being ‘transcendentally ideal’ against the branded ‘transcendental realism’ of Newton and Clarke. Starting with the latter I’ll go on to bring in the former then proceed to analyse the developments Kant forges past his predecessors. I will then conclude by assessing how and why his view holds more metaphysical depth than that put forward in the Newtonian model by looking at how he accounts for the scope and perspective of human consciousness and the epistemological limits inherent within it. To begin however I will now go to the absolutist models put forward by Newton and Clarke. Prior to Kant,...

Words: 2223 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Kant

...religious sect known as Pietists. His religious upbringing influenced his life and philosophy. 2. Kant entered the University of Königsberg were he studied the classics, physics, and philosophy. a. He was impressed by the advancements in learning made by science, particularly that of Newton. b. The dominant philosophy being taught at the University was Continental Rationalism, particularly that of Leibniz. 3. Kant’s life was remarkably unremarkable. He traveled little, and he had no notable political connections. He was known most for his meticulous, if not eccentric, behavior. Nevertheless, he was also known for being a brilliant thinker, writer, and lecturer. His most important writings include: Critique of Pure Reason, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Principles of Metaphysics and Morals, Metaphysical First Principles of Natural Science, Critique of Practical Reason, Critique of Judgment, Religion within the Limits of Pure Reason, and Perpetual Peace. A. The Shaping of Kant’s Problem 1. The major philosophical systems of his time, Rationalism and Empiricism, seemed to Kant inadequate to explain the two major issues which he articulated in his famous statement: “Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe…the starry heavens above and the moral law within.” a. On the one hand, the heavens as understood by science seemed to be ordered by deterministic laws...

Words: 4837 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Kant's Theory Of Freedom

...That is, our feelings of nature are properly designed and therefore ought to be heeded. Kant’s belief of ethics might be seen as an over-arching design and order of nature. The third illustration considers the issue of developing one’s talents. Nature endows us with aptitudes that are intended for a given purpose, which Kant implies, are valid in an appropriate system of nature. Like the antecedent moralists, Kant appeals to the teleology of nature. Initially, in the first section of Groundwork Kant seems to echo Aristotle, but then takes great care to refute Aristotle’s expositions of virtues. As Kant moves to a discussion of the second and fourth illustrations which concern duties to others, his analogy with nature prevails. Kant draws again...

Words: 5485 - Pages: 22