Premium Essay

Mamgt

In:

Submitted By soniayu
Words 14120
Pages 57
Lexical cohesion and the organization of discourse
First year report

PhD student: Ildikó Berzlánovich Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Gisela Redeker Dr. Markus Egg

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen University of Groningen

2008

Table of contents
1 Introduction.........................................................................................................1 2 Lexical cohesion...................................................................................................2 2.1 Lexical cohesion and discourse organization................................................2 2.1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................2 2.1.2 Lexical cohesion and genre.....................................................................2 2.1.3 Lexical cohesion and coherence .............................................................3 2.2 The role of lexical cohesion in the segmentation and centrality of discourse units......................................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................5 2.2.2 Discourse segmentation ..........................................................................6 2.2.3 Central discourse units............................................................................8 2.2.4 Conclusion ..............................................................................................8 3 Lexical cohesion analysis....................................................................................9 3.1 The patterns of lexical cohesion: chains and networks .................................9 3.2 Classification of lexical cohesive relations .................................................12 3.3 Elements forming lexical

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Midterm Study Guide

...-team defn sm # of ppl w complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable 6 chars Sm grps (2-10), work to achieve common goal, interdep mems, bounded/stable ovr t, auth to manage own work/internal processes, op in soc context (not island) When should use team team’s OBJs…..hi complex + interdep complex is task - breadth/depth of skills/expertise/interdepent task -pooled split up, do apart, glue together -sequential 1 way dependency -reciprocal 2 way Leadership: - main lship styles coercive - immediate compliance from ees use str8fwd tasks problem EEs crisis sits NOT use complex tasks self-mot, talented EEs ovr LT authoritative - LT direction and vision for team use new vision/clear direction needed (times of ch) new team member needs guidance you’re expert/source of auth NOT use EE exp, know much as you if not more promoting self-managed teams/participative decis-making affiliative leader - creating harmony among EEs and btwn l and team use str8fwd and perf is adequate diverse/conflicting grps to work together EEs exp personal difficulties NOT use bad EEs perf corrective pef feedback is nec crisis/complex sits, clarity control needed EE task-oriented individs democratic - building commitment and consensus among EEs Use competent, have as much/more knowl as you mems’ work muts b coord you’re unclear about best approach/have competent mems...

Words: 1553 - Pages: 7