Premium Essay

Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary

Submitted By
Words 505
Pages 3
Citations: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137

Parties: William MARBURY, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants v. James MADISON, Defendant Appellees

Objectives
Of Parties: The appellants (Marbury) filed against President Thomas Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, seeking a mandamus directing the delivery of the commission signed by ex-President John Adams, which appointed William Marbury as the justice of the peace of the District of Columbia. The appellee has declined to deliver the commission.

Theories of
The litigation: 1. Appeal: The appellants contend that the Supreme Court can, in any case, issue a write of mandamus. That it the aforementioned writ can, in any case, be directed to the secretary of state, and that, in this case, the supreme court should issue a writ of mandamus directed to James Madison. …show more content…
Appeal: The appellants are filing directly under original jurisdiction of the supreme court without previous trial and request a writ of mandamus as permitted by Judiciary Act of 1789, § 13.

Facts: Appellant William Marbury was appointed by ex-President John Adams with the consent of congress as justice of the peace for the District of Columbia and seeks possession of his commission. The secretary of state under President Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, refuses to deliver the commission over which the appellant claims a right. The appellant request a writ of mandamus to be issued by the Supreme Court under the power of its original jurisdiction directing the court to deliver the commission in question.

Issue: The issue is whether the appellant has the right to the commission he demands, whether the law provides a remedy to the violation of the right in question, whether the correct remedy to violation of the right in question is a mandamus issued by the Supreme Court, and whether the Court has the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary

...Title and Citation : Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Facts:  While it was still the Adams Administration, William Marbury was named and appointed to be a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia by John Adams within the last hours of the Adams Administration.  Adams had also made other appointments before the Administration changed to Jefferson’s name.  The appointments were acknowledged and accepted by the Senate, but due to an oversight Adam's appointments, (42 new justices of the peace as well as 16 circuit judges), did not go through and were not delivered.  When Jefferson became president, James Madison who was Jefferson's secretary of state, denied Marbury's appointment as well as the other appointments.  In response to this denial, Marbury, as well as three others who also were denied appointments, decided to fight and petition for a writ of mandamus, in an effort to have their appointments be delivered.  This case specifically focuses on Marbury.   Laws at Issue:  Article I Section VIII Clause 17,Article III Section II and The Judiciary Act of 1789...

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marbury Vs Madison Supreme Court Case

...Andrea Montes Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Throughout this paper you will understand the original crime and why this issue is being appealed. Also there will be an explanation on how the Supreme Court justified the verdict. Towards the end you will find out the result of this court case and my opinion on whether it was fair for either Marbury or Madison. To start it off this case mainly focuses on how there was a unconstitutional move or act during the process. And it explains who and what Marbury and Madison did in this case. President John Adams lost his reelection against Thomas Jefferson, a Republican. Federalist lost control of congress before the new President (jefferson) and Congress took office, although , President John Adams and his Federalist Party still had control over congress. President John Adams signed forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices under the Organic Act, an attempt by the Federalists to take control of the federal judiciary before Thomas Jefferson took office. Commissions are supposed to be turned in before the...

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mcculloch Vs Maryland Case Study

...9/21/14 McCulloch vs. Maryland Court in Context In order to fully understand how gauge whether a Supreme Court case is impactful, it is necessary to understand the types of Supreme Court cases that make up the majority of cases. According to Hall, the Supreme Court has roughly five limited functions; these are “regime enforcement, division of labor, overcoming gridlock, blame avoidance, and legitimation.” These functions are important to understand to really classify a Supreme Court case as truly important. For most people, who do not know history very well, it can be hard to understand how a case tried over 200 years impacts their life today. In the cases succeeding Marbury V. Madison (the first case to use a process known as Judicial Review) we can see these functions being exercised and develop over time....

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Supreme Court Justices

...currently has eight associate justices; this number can be fixed by Congress. The Supreme Court has a mission statement that states "The Supreme Court is the highest tribunal in the nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. The Court stands as the final arbiter of the law and guardian of constitutional liberties." It is the highest federal court in the United States and has jurisdiction over all federal courts and state courts. Who are the current members? Provide a brief summary of each. John G Roberts Jr.; Chief Justice. From Buffalo, New York, and born on January 27 of 1955, thus making him sixty years old. He attended Harvard University; he received his bachelor's degree in 1976 and his JD in 1979. He has had much experience in law, from assisting law, associate to various presidents, such as Ronald Reagan, to the US Department of Justice. He was nominated by former President George W. Bush to be Chief Justice; he has currently been active since September 29, 2005. Antonin Scalia; Scalia was born in Trenton, New Jersey. He was born on March...

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

...Today, the United States Supreme Court is regularly lambasted for many of the decisions it makes, and the phrase “worst decision in history” is regularly thrown around. The polarized political climate in the United States combined with a twenty four hour media cycle helps push this perspective, but in reality the vast majority of Supreme Court decisions are not nearly as good or bad as the public wants to believe. Of course, there are exceptions, especially historical ones. The landmark 1857 case of Dred Scott vs. Sandford is an outstanding example of a Supreme Court decision that was both as horrible as it seems, as well as impactful for a large amount of people in the United States, directly. This paper will analyze the Dred Scott decision,...

Words: 2011 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Foundation Outline (Prof. William Ewald)

...[Enter Document Title]  Foundations            of the U.S.               Legal System  Prof. William Ewald  Contributors  Wim De Vlieger Suvitcha Nativivat Alasdair Henderson Ana Carolina Kliemann Alexey Kruglyakov Rafael A. Rosillo Pasquale Siciliani Paul Lanois Gloria M. Gasso Kamel Ait El Hadj Yuanyuan Zheng Ana L. Marquez Pumthan Chaichantipyuth Wenzhen Dai Penn Law Summer 2006 I.  Introduction and Historical Background    A. What the course will cover?      This  is  not  an  introductory  course.    You  are  all  lawyers;  I  shall  assume  a  good  deal  of  professional  expertise,  and  that  many  of  you  already  have  a  body  of  knowledge  about  American  law.    The task: prepare you for the coming year, give you the basic grounding that you will need  for the courses you are going to start taking in September.  For this, you need two things:    ♥ A  great  deal  of  basic  factual  information  about  how  the  courts  and  the  legal  system  function, and about basic legal concepts (and legal vocabulary);     ♥ But  more  importantly:  background  information  about  some  of  the  critical  ways in which  the American legal system is unique, and differs from legal systems elsewhere in the  world.  This is hard: often you will find that your professors or fellow‐students will make  assumptions  or  presuppose  certain  ways  of  doing  things  that  aren’t  explained  in  class.    A  large goal of this course is to explain those assumptions...

Words: 43059 - Pages: 173