Free Essay

Marketing

In:

Submitted By atto989
Words 19146
Pages 77
22 August 2012

For Announcement to the Market
Name of Companies: BHP Billiton Limited (ABN 49 004 028 077) and BHP Billiton Plc (Registration No. 3196209)

Report for the year ended 30 June 2012 This statement includes the consolidated results of the BHP Billiton Group, comprising BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc, for the year ended 30 June 2012 compared with the year ended 30 June 2011. The results are prepared in accordance with IFRS and are presented in US dollars. US$ Million 72,226

Revenue Profit attributable to the members of the BHP Billiton Group

up

0.7%

to

down 34.8% to

15,417

Net Tangible Asset Backing: Net tangible assets per fully paid share were US$11.59 as at 30 June 2012, compared with US$10.52 at 30 June 2011. Dividends per share: Final dividend for current period (record date 7 September 2012; payment date 28 September 2012) Final dividend for previous corresponding period This statement was approved by the Board of Directors. US 57 cents fully franked

US 55 cents fully franked

Jane McAloon Group Company Secretary BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc

NEWS RELEASE
Release Time Date Number IMMEDIATE 22 August 2012 18/12

BHP BILLITON RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012

 Our strategy to own and operate large, long-life, low-cost, expandable, upstream assets diversified by commodity, geography and market remains a major point of differentiation, particularly in the current, more challenging economic environment.  Underlying EBIT(1)(2) decreased by 15% to US$27.2 billion and Attributable profit excluding exceptional items(3) declined by 21% to US$17.1 billion. Exceptional items totalling US$1.7 billion contributed to a 35% decline in Attributable profit to US$15.4 billion.  Underlying EBIT margin(3) remained at a robust 39% while Underlying return on capital was 23%.  Strong momentum established with annual production records achieved at 10 operations. Our low risk, largely brownfield projects in execution are expected to create substantial shareholder value.  Net operating cash flow(4) of US$24.4 billion reflected the strong cash generating capacity of the business throughout the economic cycle. Gearing of 26% remains within the parameters defined by our solid A credit rating.  An 11% increase in the 2012 financial year dividend takes the compound annual growth rate of our progressive dividend to 26% over the last 10 years.
Year ended 30 June Revenue Underlying EBITDA(1) (1)(2) Underlying EBIT Profit from operations Attributable profit – excluding exceptional items Attributable profit (4) Net operating cash flow Basic earnings per share – excluding exceptional items (US cents) Basic earnings per share (US cents) Underlying EBITDA interest coverage (times)(1)(3) Dividend per share (US cents) 2012 US$M 72,226 33,746 27,238 23,752 17,117 15,417 24,384 321.6 289.6 53.2 112.0 2011 US$M 71,739 37,093 31,980 31,816 21,684 23,648 30,080 393.5 429.1 102.8 101.0 Change % 0.7% (9.0%) (14.8%) (25.3%) (21.1%) (34.8%) (18.9%) (18.3%) (32.5%) (48.2%) 10.9%

The financial information on pages 21 to 43 has been prepared in accordance with IFRS. This news release including the financial information is unaudited. Refer to page 17 for footnotes, including explanations of the non-IFRS measures used in this announcement. Variance analysis relates to the relative financial and/or production performance of BHP Billiton and/or its operations during the year ended 30 June 2012 compared with the year ended 30 June 2011, unless otherwise noted.

News Release

RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Safety is a priority for BHP Billiton BHP Billiton’s commitment to establish best practice in health and safety was illustrated by a six per cent decline in the Group’s Total Recordable Injury Frequency (TRIF) in the 2012 financial year. Regrettably, despite the decline in the TRIF to its lowest level on record, the Group suffered the tragic loss of three colleagues over the twelve month period. The Group will maintain and enhance its focus on the elimination of fatal risks. Robust performance in a challenging environment Our strategy to own and operate large, long-life, low-cost, expandable, upstream assets diversified by commodity, geography and market remains a major point of differentiation, particularly in the current, more challenging economic environment. Disciplined investment throughout the economic cycle has established strong momentum in our major businesses, demonstrated by a twelfth consecutive annual production record at Western Australia Iron Ore (WAIO) and record annual production at another nine operations. Weakness in commodity markets and industry wide cost pressure resulted in a 15 per cent decline in Underlying EBIT and a 21 per cent fall in Attributable profit (excluding exceptional items) in the 2012 financial year. Net operating cash flow of US$24.4 billion declined by 19 per cent while Underlying return on capital was 23 per cent. The value of the Company’s diversified strategy was reflected in the Group’s Underlying EBIT margin, which remained at a robust 39 per cent. The Group has been quick to respond to the change in the operating environment and has acted decisively by closing energy intensive silicomanganese alloy production capacity in South Africa and by temporarily closing capacity at TEMCO (Australia). In addition, metallurgical coal production at Norwich Park (Australia) was suspended following a review of the mine’s profitability. The viability of other high-cost operations is being assessed and additional measures are being implemented that will substantially reduce operating costs and non-essential expenditure across the business. The sale of our 37 per cent non-operated interest in Richards Bay Minerals (South Africa) to Rio Tinto is well advanced while the review of our diamonds business is ongoing. Other targeted divestments are being considered. These actions demonstrate the Group’s commitment to further simplify the portfolio. Exceptional items contributed to the decline in Attributable profit Attributable profit of US$15.4 billion for the 2012 financial year included a number of exceptional items: an impairment of the Fayetteville (US) dry gas assets acquired from Chesapeake Energy in March 2011 of US$1.8 billion (US$2.8 billion before tax); an impairment of the Nickel West (Australia) assets of US$355 million (US$449 million before tax); and a US$342 million (US$452 million before tax) charge for the suspension or early closure of operations and the change in status of specific projects, which included an impairment of the Olympic Dam Project (Australia). Other exceptional items included the settlement of insurance claims at Queensland Coal (Australia), which resulted in other income of US$199 million (US$284 million before tax), while a US$637 million non-cash income tax credit was recognised following the passage of Australia’s Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) and Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT) extension into legislation in March 2012. Investing in high return growth With 20 major projects currently in execution with a combined budget of US$22.8 billion, BHP Billiton is largely committed for the 2013 financial year. No major project approvals are expected over this timeframe. The majority of the Group’s high quality projects in execution are scheduled to deliver first production before the end of the 2015 financial year. These low risk, largely brownfield projects will underpin the strong near-term momentum that has been established in our major businesses and create substantial value for our shareholders.
2

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

BHP Billiton has an unrivalled portfolio of development options beyond those projects in execution and a significant number of these are embedded within our existing footprint. As our current expenditure commitments decline, future capital will be allocated to those options that maximise shareholder value, while also considering the balance between short and long-term returns. Our proven strategy delivers sector leading shareholder returns The Group’s long stated priorities for capital management remain unchanged: firstly, to invest in high return growth opportunities throughout the economic cycle; secondly, to maintain a solid A credit rating and to grow our progressive dividend; and finally, to return excess capital to shareholders. The disciplined application of these priorities within the framework of our strategy has not only facilitated strong growth in the business but has also enabled the Company to return US$53.8 billion to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buy-backs over the last 10 years. The total dividend declared for the 2012 financial year increased by 11 per cent to 112 US cents per share. The increase in the final dividend to 57 US cents per share takes the compound annual growth rate of our progressive dividend to 26 per cent over that same 10 year period. Outlook Economic outlook Concerns surrounding the stability of the Eurozone and the decline in economic activity that accompanied the managed slowdown of growth in China led to significant market volatility in the 2012 financial year. In China, the Government has introduced stimulatory measures aimed at supporting sustainable growth. The successful containment of inflation, looser monetary policy and evidence of a recovery in infrastructure investment should be positive for commodities demand in the short to medium term. Similarly, there are encouraging signs that the United States housing market may have stabilised which should translate into upside for the world’s largest economy if it leads to an improvement in consumer and business confidence. Our positive longer-term view is unchanged as urbanisation and industrialisation across the developing world is expected to remain the primary driver of global economic growth. While the rate of expansion within China has adjusted to a more sustainable level as its economy has matured, economic growth in this decade is expected to rise substantially in absolute terms given the higher starting base. Commodities outlook Prices for many of BHP Billiton’s products declined during the 2012 financial year as global economic growth slowed and concerns surrounding the economic outlook increased. The impact was compounded by improved supply for some commodities. In the short term, we expect volatility in commodity markets to persist as temporary weakness in the manufacturing and construction sectors across all key markets is expected to weigh on market sentiment. However, in the medium term we expect supportive economic policy and a broad growth bias, particularly in China, to lead to measured improvement in the external environment beginning in the first half of the 2013 financial year. Growth in fixed asset investment in China over this timeframe is expected to support demand for the steel making raw materials and iron ore prices specifically. In the longer-term, however, the strong financial returns that are being generated by the low-cost iron ore producers will continue to encourage investment in brownfield capacity. The development of this low-cost supply should, in our view, lead to a flattening of the cost curve and the gradual mean reversion of prices, consistent with the backwardated nature of the iron ore forward curve.

3

News Release

The long-term dynamics for copper are particularly positive. Structural operating and capital cost pressure associated with rising strip ratios and declining ore grades suggests that a relatively steep copper cost curve should be maintained. Furthermore, the need to attract substantial new capacity into the market every year, if supply is to keep pace with demand, should provide long-term support for the copper price. Geopolitical concerns and macroeconomic sentiment continued to influence the energy complex and crude oil pricing in particular. In the United States, the combination of an unusually warm winter and strong supply growth had a detrimental impact on the Henry Hub natural gas price in the second half of the 2012 financial year. This rapid decline in price resulted in a very significant switch from coal to gas fired electricity generation while on the supply side, there was a marked decrease in the level of drilling activity in the dry gas basins. As the market continues to rebalance, we believe that the Henry Hub gas price will adjust to reflect the economics of incremental investment which should, in our view, support higher prices in the longer-term. In summary, the global macroeconomic environment is expected to stabilise before improving in the first half of the 2013 financial year. This recovery will provide support for commodity demand and pricing in the short to medium term. For specific commodities, the industry will find it difficult to develop new supply quickly enough to satisfy the expected increase in demand. This is particularly the case for industries where barriers to entry are high (e.g. potash) or where the global resource endowment is in decline (e.g. copper). We believe that our strategy of being a low-cost, upstream, diversified natural resources company will provide more opportunities to create long-term shareholder value as commodity demand patterns evolve with economic development.

4

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Development projects BHP Billiton approved eight major projects during the 2012 financial year for a total investment commitment of US$7.5 billion (BHP Billiton share). Pre-commitment funding of US$2.7 billion (BHP Billiton share) was also approved to further progress a series of development options. In response to the challenging external environment the Group has chosen to delay the 2.5 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) expansion of Peak Downs that is associated with the Caval Ridge mine development (Australia). The 5.5 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) Caval Ridge mine remains on schedule to deliver first production in the 2014 calendar year. With 20 major projects currently in execution with a combined budget of US$22.8 billion, BHP Billiton is largely committed for the 2013 financial year. No major project approvals are expected over this timeframe. As our current expenditure commitments decline, future capital will be allocated to those options that maximise shareholder value, while also considering the balance between short and long-term returns. Six major projects delivered first production in the 2012 financial year, namely: WAIO Rapid Growth Project 5, Worsley Efficiency and Growth, North West Shelf CWLH Life Extension and the New South Wales Energy Coal RX1 Project (all Australia), the Antamina Expansion (Peru) and the Escondida Ore Access project (Chile). Projects that delivered first production during the 2012 financial year
Customer Sector Group Petroleum Project Capacity(i) Capital expenditure (US$M)(i) Budget North West Shelf CWLH Life Extension (Australia) BHP Billiton – 16.67% Worsley Efficiency and Growth (Australia) BHP Billiton – 86% Antamina Expansion (Peru) BHP Billiton – 33.75% Escondida Ore Access (Chile) BHP Billiton – 57.5% Iron Ore WAIO Rapid Growth Project 5 (Australia) BHP Billiton – 85% Replacement vessel with capacity of 60,000 barrels of oil per day. 1.1 million tonnes per annum of additional alumina capacity. Increases ore processing capacity to 130,000 tonnes per day. The relocation of the in-pit crushing and conveyor infrastructure provides access to higher grade ore. Project integrated into subsequent expansion approvals that will increase WAIO capacity to 220 (v) million tonnes per annum . Increases run-of-mine thermal coal production by approximately 4 million tonnes per annum. 245 Actual(iii) 211 Date of initial production(ii) Target 2011 Actual Q3 2011

Aluminium

2,995(iv)

2,995

Q1 2012(iv)

Q1 2012

Base Metals

435

435

Q1 2012

(iv)

Q1 2012

319

319

Q2 2012

Q2 2012

4,800

4,800

H2 2011

Q3 2011

Energy Coal

RX1 Project (Australia) BHP Billiton – 100%

400

400

H2 2012

(iv)

Q2 2012

9,194
(i) (ii)

9,160

All references to capital expenditure are BHP Billiton’s share unless noted otherwise. All references to capacity are 100 per cent unless noted otherwise. References are based on calendar years.

(iii) Number subject to finalisation. (iv) As per revised budget and/or schedule. (v) Consistent with the revised scope of the iron ore development sequence.

5

News Release

Projects approved during the 2012 financial year
Customer Sector Group Petroleum Project Capacity
(i)

Budgeted capital expenditure (i) (US$M) 400

Target date for initial (ii) production 2016

North West Shelf Greater To maintain LNG plant throughput Western Flank-A (Australia) from the North West Shelf operations. BHP Billiton – 16.67%

Base Metals Escondida Organic Growth Replaces the Los Colorados Project 1 (Chile) concentrator with a new 152,000 tonnes per day plant. BHP Billiton – 57.5% Escondida Oxide Leach Area Project (Chile) BHP Billiton – 57.5% Iron Ore WAIO Orebody 24 (Australia) BHP Billiton – 85% New dynamic leaching pad and mineral handling system. Maintains oxide leaching capacity. Maintains iron ore production output from the Newman Joint Venture operations. The greenfield mine will add 5.5 million tonnes per annum of export metallurgical coal as planned. The associated 2.5 million tonnes per annum expansion of Peak Downs has been delayed indefinitely. Maintains Illawarra Coal’s production capacity with a replacement mining domain and capacity to produce 3.5 million tonnes per annum of metallurgical coal. Increases saleable thermal coal production by 8 million tonnes per annum to approximately 40 million tonnes per annum.

2,207

H1 2015

414

H1 2014

698

H2 2012

Metallurgical Caval Ridge (Australia) Coal BHP Billiton – 50%

2,100(iii)

2014

Appin Area 9 (Australia) BHP Billiton – 100%

845

2016

Energy Coal Cerrejon P40 Project (Colombia) BHP Billiton – 33.3%

437

2013

Newcastle Third Port Increases total coal terminal capacity Project Stage 3 (Australia) from 53 million tonnes per annum to BHP Billiton – 35.5% 66 million tonnes per annum.

367

2014

7,468
(i) All references to capital expenditure are BHP Billiton’s share unless noted otherwise. All references to capacity are 100 per cent unless noted otherwise.

(ii) References are based on calendar years. (iii) Capital expenditure under review following the decision to delay the 2.5 million tonnes per annum expansion of Peak Downs. Excludes announced pre-commitment funding.

6

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Projects currently under development (approved in prior years)
Customer Sector Group Petroleum Project Capacity
(i)

Budgeted capital expenditure (US$M)(i) 1,050 900(iii)

Target date for initial production(ii) 2013 2012(iii)(iv)

Macedon (Australia) BHP Billiton – 71.43% Bass Strait Kipper (Australia) BHP Billiton – 32.5% – 50% Bass Strait Turrum (Australia) BHP Billiton – 50% North West Shelf North Rankin B Gas Compression (Australia) BHP Billiton – 16.67%

200 million cubic feet of gas per day. 10,000 barrels of condensate per day and processing capacity of 80 million cubic feet of gas per day. 11,000 barrels of condensate per day and processing capacity of 200 million cubic feet of gas per day. 2,500 million cubic feet of gas per day.

1,350

(iii)

2013

(iii)

850

2013

Diamonds & EKATI Misery Open Pit Specialty Project (Canada) Products BHP Billiton – 80% Iron Ore WAIO Jimblebar Mine Expansion (Australia) BHP Billiton – 96% WAIO Port Hedland Inner Harbour Expansion (Australia) BHP Billiton – 85% WAIO Port Blending and Rail Yard Facilities (Australia) BHP Billiton – 85% Samarco Fourth Pellet Plant (Brazil) BHP Billiton – 50% Metallurgical Daunia (Australia) Coal BHP Billiton – 50%

Project consists of a pushback of the existing Misery open pit which was mined from 2001 to 2005. Increases mining and processing capacity to 35 million tonnes per annum. Increases total inner harbour capacity to 220 million tonnes per annum with debottlenecking opportunities to 240 million tonnes per annum. Optimises resource and enhances efficiency across the WAIO supply chain. Increases iron ore pellet production capacity by 8.3 million tonnes per annum to 30.5 million tonnes per annum. Greenfield mine development with capacity to produce 4.5 million tonnes per annum of export metallurgical coal. Increases productive capacity by 0.4 million tonnes per annum and extends the life of the mine by 21 years. Increases port capacity from 44 million tonnes per annum to 55 million tonnes per annum and reduces storm vulnerability.

323

2015

3,300(v)

Q1 2014

1,900(v)

H2 2012

1,400(v)

H2 2014

1,750

H1 2014

800

2013

Broadmeadow Life Extension (Australia) BHP Billiton – 50% Hay Point Stage Three Expansion (Australia) BHP Billiton – 50%

450

2013

1,250

(v)

2014

15,323
(i) (ii) All references to capital expenditure are BHP Billiton’s share unless noted otherwise. All references to capacity are 100 per cent unless noted otherwise. References are based on calendar years.

(iii) As per revised budget and/or schedule. (iv) Facilities ready for first production pending resolution of mercury content. (v) Excludes announced pre-commitment funding.

7

News Release

Income statement To provide clarity regarding the underlying performance of our operations we present Underlying EBIT, which is a measure used internally and in our Supplementary Information, that excludes any exceptional items. Exceptional items are described on page 11. The difference between Underlying EBIT and Profit from operations is set out in the following table:
Year ended 30 June Underlying EBIT Exceptional items (before taxation) Profit from operations (EBIT) 2012 US$M 27,238 (3,486) 23,752 2011 US$M 31,980 (164) 31,816

Underlying EBIT The following table and commentary describes the approximate impact of the principal factors that affected Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year compared with the 2011 financial year:
US$M Underlying EBIT for the year ended 30 June 2011 Change in volumes: Increase in volumes Decrease in volumes Net price impact: Change in sales prices Price-linked costs Change in costs: Costs (rate and usage) Exchange rates Inflation on costs Asset sales Ceased and sold operations New and acquired operations Exploration and business development Other Underlying EBIT for the year ended 30 June 2012 US$M 31,980

2,529 (2,221) 308 (2,213) 253 (1,960) (3,138) 820 (764) (3,082) 78 347 (86) (819) 472 27,238

Volumes Disciplined investment throughout the economic cycle has established strong momentum in our major businesses, demonstrated by a twelfth consecutive annual production record at WAIO and record annual production at another nine operations. In aggregate, volumes increased Underlying EBIT by US$308 million in the period. WAIO shipments rose to a record annualised rate of 179 million tonnes in the June 2012 quarter (100 per cent basis). The resultant 23 million tonne (BHP Billiton share) uplift in WAIO shipments increased Underlying EBIT by US$2.4 billion in the 2012 financial year. Downtime at our non-operated facilities in the Gulf of Mexico (US) and the North West Shelf, and natural field decline, particularly at Pyrenees (Australia), were the major contributors to the volume related US$1.1 billion reduction in Underlying EBIT for the Petroleum business. The high margin Atlantis and Mad Dog (both US) facilities resumed production in August 2012. In Base Metals, annual copper production records were set at Antamina and Spence (Chile) although lower grades and industrial action constrained performance at Escondida. An overall decline in Base Metals volumes reduced Underlying EBIT by US$509 million in the period.

8

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Prices Prices for many of BHP Billiton’s products declined during the 2012 financial year as global economic growth slowed and concerns surrounding the economic outlook increased. In total, lower average realised prices reduced Underlying EBIT by US$2.0 billion in the 2012 financial year, net of price-linked costs. The impact was most apparent in our Base Metals and Iron Ore businesses where weaker prices reduced Underlying EBIT by US$1.6 billion and US$1.3 billion, respectively. No respite was provided for our Aluminium, Manganese and Stainless Steel Materials businesses where lower realised prices reduced Underlying EBIT by a combined US$1.2 billion. In Petroleum, a 19 per cent increase in the average realised price of oil and a 29 per cent rise in the average realised price of liquefied natural gas contributed to a US$1.5 billion increase in Underlying EBIT in the 2012 financial year. In addition, stronger thermal and metallurgical coal prices increased Underlying EBIT by a combined US$434 million, net of price-linked costs. Costs Higher costs, excluding the impacts of inflation, exchange rate volatility and non-cash items, reduced Underlying EBIT by US$2.7 billion in the 2012 financial year. Labour and contractor cost increases accounted for approximately one third of the impact while industrial action at Queensland Coal created additional pressure. The Group has been quick to respond to the change in the operating environment and has acted decisively by closing energy intensive silicomanganese alloy production capacity in South Africa and by temporarily closing capacity at TEMCO. In addition, metallurgical coal production at Norwich Park was suspended following a review of the mine’s profitability. The viability of other high-cost operations is being assessed and additional measures are being implemented that will substantially reduce operating costs and non-essential expenditure across the business. Non-cash items, which included foreign exchange rate related adjustments to the carrying value of inventory and higher depreciation associated with the completion of major projects, reduced Underlying EBIT by a further US$435 million in the 2012 financial year. Exchange rates The cost related impact of the stronger Australian dollar reduced Underlying EBIT by US$565 million in the 2012 financial year. However, the positive restatement of monetary items in the balance sheet that followed the general strengthening of the US dollar against a basket of currencies at the end of the period resulted in a US$1.1 billion increase in Underlying EBIT. In total, exchange rate volatility increased Underlying EBIT by US$820 million. The following exchange rates against the US dollar have been applied:
Average Year ended 30 June 2012 1.03 492 1,825 1.78 7.77 Average Year ended 30 June 2011 0.99 486 1,843 1.68 7.01 As at 30 June 2012 1.00 510 1,807 2.08 8.41 As at 30 June 2011 1.07 470 1,779 1.57 6.80 As at 30 June 2010 0.85 545 1,920 1.81 7.68

Australian dollar(i) Chilean peso Colombian peso Brazilian real South African rand
(i)

Displayed as US$ to A$1 based on common convention.

Inflation on costs Inflationary pressure had an unfavourable impact on all Customer Sector Groups and reduced Underlying EBIT by US$764 million during the 2012 financial year. The pressure was most notable in Australia and South Africa which accounted for 75 per cent of the total impact.

9

News Release

Asset sales The contribution of asset sales to Underlying EBIT increased by US$78 million from the corresponding period and primarily reflected the receipt of a post-closing payment that followed the 2006 divestment of our interests in Cascade and Chinook (US). Ceased and sold operations A favourable foreign exchange related restatement and partial release of the Newcastle steelworks (Australia) rehabilitation provision accounted for the majority of the US$347 million increase in Underlying EBIT. New and acquired operations Assets are reported as new and acquired operations until there is a full year period for comparison. New and acquired operations reduced Underlying EBIT by US$86 million in the 2012 financial year. Exploration and business development Exploration expense increased by US$662 million to US$1.7 billion in the 2012 financial year. Within Minerals (US$928 million expense), greenfield exploration continued on copper targets in South America, nickel and copper targets in Australia, and iron ore and potash targets globally. Petroleum exploration expense was US$818 million and included a US$144 million impairment of exploration previously capitalised. Our activities focused on offshore Western Australia, the Gulf of Mexico, South East Asia and our recently acquired Onshore US business. A general increase in the level of business development expenditure reduced Underlying EBIT by a further US$157 million in the 2012 financial year. Other The absence of specific provisions and non-cash charges that were reported in the Aluminium and Base Metals businesses in the 2011 financial year largely accounted for a US$472 million increase in Underlying EBIT in the period. Net finance costs Net finance costs increased to US$730 million from US$561 million in the corresponding period. This was primarily driven by increased net interest expense on higher net debt, partially offset by exchange rate variations on net debt. Taxation expense Total taxation expense including royalty-related taxation, exceptional items and exchange rate movements, was US$7.5 billion, representing an effective tax rate of 32.5 per cent (30 June 2011: 23.4 per cent). Excluding the impacts of royalty-related taxation, exceptional items and exchange rate movements, taxation (3) expense was US$8.1 billion representing an underlying effective tax rate of 30.5 per cent (30 June 2011: 32.1 per cent). Exchange rate movements increased taxation expense by US$250 million (30 June 2011: decrease of US$1.5 billion). The reduced impact compared to the 2011 financial year is predominantly due to eligible Australian entities electing to adopt a US dollar tax functional currency from 1 July 2011. Exceptional items decreased taxation expense by US$1.7 billion (30 June 2011: decrease of US$2.1 billion) predominantly due to the recognition of tax benefits of US$1.2 billion arising from the impairments of goodwill and other assets in relation to the Fayetteville shale gas assets, Nickel West and the Olympic Dam expansion project, and the recognition of a net income tax benefit of US$637 million on enactment of the MRRT and PRRT extension legislation in Australia.
10

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Government imposed royalty arrangements calculated by reference to profits after adjustment for temporary differences are reported as royalty-related taxation. Royalty-related taxation (excluding exceptional items) contributed US$889 million to taxation expense representing an effective tax rate of 3.9 per cent (30 June 2011: US$828 million and 2.6 per cent). Other royalty and excise arrangements which do not have these characteristics are recognised as operating costs within profit before taxation. These amounted to US$3.1 billion during the period (30 June 2011: US$2.9 billion). Exceptional items
Year ended 30 June 2012 Exceptional items by category Impairment of Fayetteville goodwill and other assets Impairment of Nickel West goodwill and other assets Suspension or early closure of operations and the change in status of specific projects(i) (i) Settlement of insurance claims Recognition of deferred tax assets on enactment of MRRT and PRRT extension legislation in Australia Gross US$M (2,835) (449) (502) 300 – (3,486) Tax US$M 996 94 108 (90) 637 1,745 Net US$M (1,839) (355) (394) 210 637 (1,741)

(i) Includes amounts attributable to non-controlling interests of US$(34) million (US$7 million tax expense).

As a result of the fall in United States domestic gas prices and the company’s decision to adjust its development plans, the Group has recognised impairments of goodwill and other assets in relation to its Fayetteville shale gas assets. A total impairment charge of US$2.8 billion (US$996 million tax benefit) was recognised in the 2012 financial year. The Group has recognised impairments of goodwill and other assets at Nickel West as a result of the continued downturn in the nickel price and margin deterioration. A total impairment charge of US$449 million (US$94 million tax benefit) was recognised in the 2012 financial year. As part of our regular portfolio review, various operations and projects around the Group have either been suspended, closed early or changed in status. These include: the change in status of the Olympic Dam expansion project; the temporary suspension of production at TEMCO and the permanent closure of the Metalloys South Plant in South Africa; the indefinite cessation of production at Norwich Park; and the suspension of other minor capital projects. As a result, impairment charges of US$422 million (US$84 million tax benefit), idle capacity costs and inventory write-down of US$40 million (US$12 million tax benefit) and other restructuring costs of US$40 million (US$12 million tax benefit) were recognised in the 2012 financial year. During 2008, extreme weather across the central Queensland coalfields affected production from the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) and BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal (BMC) operations. The Group settled insurance claims in respect of the lost production and insurance claim income of US$300 million (US$90 million tax expense) was recognised in the 2012 financial year. The Australian MRRT and PRRT extension legislation were enacted in March 2012. Under the legislation, the Group is entitled to a deduction against future MRRT and PRRT liabilities based on the market value of its coal, iron ore and petroleum assets. A deferred tax asset, and an associated net income tax benefit of US$637 million, was recognised in the 2012 financial year to reflect the future deductibility of these market values for MRRT and PRRT purposes, to the extent they are considered recoverable. Cash flows Net operating cash flows after interest and tax decreased by 19 per cent to US$24.4 billion for the 2012 financial year. A US$3.8 billion reduction in cash generated from operations (after changes in working capital balances) was the major contributor to the decline. Higher net income tax paid and increased royalty-related taxation payments further reduced net operating cash flows after interest and tax by US$1.4 billion and US$408 million, respectively.
11

News Release

Investing cash flows increased by US$15.6 billion primarily driven by investment in subsidiaries and operations of US$12.6 billion in the 2012 financial year. Capital and exploration expenditure totalled US$20.8 billion in the 2012 financial year. Expenditure on major growth projects was US$16.3 billion, including US$5.1 billion on Petroleum projects and US$11.2 billion on Minerals projects. Capital expenditure on sustaining and other items was US$2.0 billion. Exploration expenditure was US$2.5 billion, including US$1.6 billion classified within net operating cash flows. Net financing cash flows include proceeds from borrowings of US$13.3 billion partially offset by dividend payments of US$5.9 billion and debt repayments of US$4.3 billion. Proceeds from borrowings include the issuance of a three tranche Global Bond of US$3.0 billion, a five tranche Global Bond of US$5.3 billion, a two tranche Euro Bond of €2.0 billion and proceeds from Commercial Paper of US$995 million. Net debt, comprising interest bearing liabilities less cash, was US$23.6 billion which was an increase of US$17.8 billion compared to the net debt position at 30 June 2011. Dividend Disciplined investment in our business, our commitment to a solid A credit rating and progressive dividend, and a track record of returning surplus capital to shareholders, have been the hallmarks of our capital management strategy for more than a decade. This approach has not only facilitated strong growth in our business but has also enabled the company to return US$53.8 billion to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buy-backs over the last 10 years. The total dividend declared for the 2012 financial year increased by 11 per cent to 112 US cents per share. The increase in the final dividend to 57 US cents per share takes the compound annual growth rate of our progressive dividend to 26 per cent over that same 10 year period. The dividend to be paid by BHP Billiton Limited will be fully franked for Australian taxation purposes. Dividends for the BHP Billiton Group are determined and declared in US dollars. However, BHP Billiton Limited dividends are mainly paid in Australian dollars, and BHP Billiton Plc dividends are mainly paid in pounds sterling and South African rand to shareholders on the UK section and the South African section of the register, respectively. Currency conversions will be based on the foreign currency exchange rates on the Record Date, except for the conversion into South African rand, which will take place on the last day to trade on JSE Limited, being 31 August 2012. Please note that all currency conversion elections must be registered by the Record Date, being 7 September 2012. Any currency conversion elections made after this date will not apply to this dividend. The timetable in respect of this dividend will be: Last day to trade cum dividend on JSE Limited and currency conversion into rand Ex-dividend Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and JSE Limited (JSE) Ex-dividend London Stock Exchange (LSE) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Record Date (including currency conversion and currency election dates, except for rand) Payment date 31 August 2012 3 September 2012 5 September 2012 7 September 2012 28 September 2012

American Depositary Shares (ADSs) each represent two fully paid ordinary shares and receive dividends accordingly. BHP Billiton Plc shareholders registered on the South African section of the register will not be able to dematerialise or rematerialise their shareholdings between the dates of 3 September and 7 September 2012 (inclusive), nor will transfers between the UK register and the South African register be permitted between the dates of 31 August and 7 September 2012 (inclusive). Details of the currency exchange rates applicable for the dividend will be announced to the relevant stock exchanges following conversion and will appear on the Group’s website.

12

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Debt management and liquidity In August 2011, the Group arranged a new unsecured 364 day multicurrency term and revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Petrohawk Energy Corporation. The US$7.5 billion facility consisted of two tranches: a US$5.0 billion term loan and a US$2.5 billion revolving credit facility. The term loan and the revolving credit facility have since been cancelled. During the 2012 financial year the Group issued the following debt securities in the debt capital markets:  In November 2011, a three tranche Global Bond comprising US$1.0 billion 1.125% Senior Notes due 2014, US$750 million 1.875% Senior Notes due 2016 and US$1.25 billion 3.250% Senior Notes due 2021.  In February 2012, a five tranche Global Bond comprising US$1.0 billion Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014 paying interest at three-month US dollar LIBOR plus 27 basis points, US$1.0 billion 1.000% Senior Notes due 2015, US$1.25 billion 1.625% Senior Notes due 2017, US$1.0 billion 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022, and US$1.0 billion 4.125% Senior Notes due 2042.  In May 2012, a two tranche Euro Bond comprising €1.25 billion 2.125% bonds due 2018 and €750 million 3.000% bonds due 2024. As at 30 June 2012, the Group had US$995 million outstanding in the US commercial paper market and the Group's cash and cash equivalents on hand was US$4.9 billion. The Group has access to an undrawn US$4.0 billion Revolving Credit Facility to support the commercial paper program, which expires in December 2015. Our commitment to maintain a solid A credit rating remains unchanged. Corporate governance On 14 May 2012, the Board announced the appointment of Mr Pat Davies as a Non-executive Director with effect from 1 June 2012.

CUSTOMER SECTOR GROUP SUMMARY
The following table provides a summary of the performance of the Customer Sector Groups for the 2012 financial year and the corresponding period.
Year ended 30 June (US$M) Petroleum Aluminium Base Metals Diamonds and Specialty Products Stainless Steel Materials Iron Ore Manganese Metallurgical Coal Energy Coal (ii) Group and unallocated items Less: inter-segment revenue BHP Billiton Group
(i) (ii)

2012 12,937 4,766 11,596 1,326 2,993 22,601 2,152 7,576 6,022 310 (53) 72,226

Revenue 2011 10,737 5,221 14,152 1,517 3,861 20,412 2,423 7,573 5,507 385 (49) 71,739

Change % 20.5% (8.7%) (18.1%) (12.6%) (22.5%) 10.7% (11.2%) 0.0% 9.4% N/A N/A 0.7%

Underlying EBIT(i) 2012 2011 Change % 6,348 6,330 0.3% (291) 266 (209.4%) 3,965 6,790 (41.6%) 199 587 (66.1%) 32 588 (94.6%) 14,201 13,328 6.6% 235 697 (66.3%) 1,570 2,670 (41.2%) 1,227 1,129 8.7% (248) (405) N/A – – N/A 27,238 31,980 (14.8%)

Underlying EBIT includes trading activities comprising the sale of third party product. Underlying EBIT for the Group is reconciled to Profit from operations on page 8. Includes consolidation adjustments, unallocated items and external sales from the Group's freight, transport and logistics operations.

13

News Release

Petroleum The successful integration and further development of our Onshore US shale liquids and gas assets contributed to a 40 per cent increase in petroleum production to 222 million barrels of oil equivalent for the 2012 financial year. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year was unchanged from the prior period at US$6.3 billion. This strong financial performance was achieved despite natural field decline at Pyrenees and the substantial deferral of high margin production in the Gulf of Mexico and the North West Shelf. Higher prices increased Underlying EBIT by US$1.5 billion largely as a result of a 19 per cent increase in the average realised price of oil to US$110.66 per barrel and a 29 per cent rise in the average realised price of liquefied natural gas to US$14.23 per thousand standard cubic feet. For US natural gas, our average realised price in the 2012 financial year was US$2.82 per thousand standard cubic feet. We achieved success in our conventional exploration program in the 2012 financial year as seven of 12 wells encountered hydrocarbons. The associated rise in our level of activity resulted in a US$310 million increase in exploration expense for the period. A US$775 million high impact exploration program, largely focused on the Gulf of Mexico and Western Australia, will target large prospective resources in the 2013 financial year. Capital expenditure across our conventional and unconventional businesses totalled US$5.8 billion in the 2012 financial year. Exploration and development expenditure specifically within our Onshore US business totalled US$3.7 billion and is expected to rise to US$4.0 billion in the 2013 financial year. Over 80 per cent of the activity in our Onshore US business will be focused on the liquids rich Eagle Ford shale and the Permian Basin. Development of these liquids rich shales complements our traditional project pipeline given the rapid payback on investment and particularly high rates of return. Petroleum production is forecast to increase to approximately 240 million barrels of oil equivalent in the 2013 financial year, despite the deferral of Onshore US natural gas drilling. This includes a 15 per cent rise in valuable liquids production which will be underpinned by the recommencement of operations at Mad Dog and Atlantis and an increase in activity in our liquids rich Onshore US acreage. The strong growth potential of our shale business was demonstrated by the 60 per cent increase in liquids production to more than 40 thousand barrels per day over the 10 month period. Aluminium Record annual production at the Alumar refinery (Brazil) contributed to a four per cent increase in total alumina production in the 2012 financial year. Metal production was lower as potline capacity at Hillside (South Africa) was temporarily curtailed following a major unplanned outage in the March 2012 quarter. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year decreased by US$557 million to a loss of US$291 million as weaker prices and cost escalation drove significant margin compression. An eight per cent reduction in the average realised price of aluminium (to US$2,314 per tonne) and a three per cent decline in the average realised price of alumina (to US$333 per tonne) reduced Underlying EBIT by US$245 million, net of price-linked costs. Higher raw material costs for inputs such as coke and caustic soda led to a further US$223 million decline in Underlying EBIT. Costs associated with the Hillside outage added to the decline. The Worsley Efficiency and Growth project delivered first production during the 2012 financial year. Base Metals BHP Billiton established strong momentum in its Base Metals business in the June 2012 quarter. Escondida copper production increased by 22 per cent from the March 2012 quarter as mining activities progressed towards higher grade ore while quarterly material mined, mill throughput and copper production records at Antamina added to the strong finish to the year. Annual copper production, however, declined marginally in the 2012 financial year as lower grades and industrial action constrained performance at Escondida for the first nine months of the year.

14

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year decreased by US$2.8 billion to US$4.0 billion. A 14 per cent fall in the average realised price of copper to US$3.58 per pound was the major contributor to the decline and reduced Underlying EBIT by US$1.4 billion. General cost pressure across the Base Metals portfolio, together with unit cost escalation specifically associated with industrial activity and lower ore grades at Escondida, reduced Underlying EBIT by US$841 million. At 30 June 2012, the Group had 278,547 tonnes of outstanding copper sales that were revalued at a weighted average price of US$3.49 per pound. The final price of these sales will be determined in the 2013 financial year. In addition, 239,156 tonnes of copper sales from the 2011 financial year were subject to a finalisation adjustment in 2012. This finalisation adjustment and the provisional pricing impact as at 30 June 2012 decreased Underlying EBIT by US$265 million for the period (2011 financial year: US$650 million gain). Escondida copper production is forecast to increase by approximately 20 per cent in the 2013 financial year. Successful completion of both the Escondida Ore Access and Laguna Seca debottlenecking projects is expected to drive Escondida copper production to over 1.3 million tonnes (100 per cent basis) in the 2015 financial year. Development of Escondida Organic Growth Project 1 and the Oxide Leach Area Project is expected to sustain Escondida copper production at an elevated level for the remainder of this decade. Diamonds and Specialty Products As anticipated, diamond production in the 2012 financial year was lower than the prior period. EKATI (Canada) production is forecast to remain constrained in the medium term as the operations extract lower grade material, consistent with the mine plan. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year declined by US$388 million to US$199 million, despite stronger diamond and titanium prices that increased Underlying EBIT by US$246 million. The decline in production at EKATI, which reduced Underlying EBIT by US$357 million, was the major contributing factor to the compression of operating margins. Higher potash exploration and business development costs decreased Underlying EBIT by a further US$171 million. The sale of our 37 per cent non-operated interest in Richards Bay Minerals to Rio Tinto is well advanced while the review of our diamonds business is ongoing. Stainless Steel Materials The successful replacement of the Line 1 furnace at Cerro Matoso (Colombia) in the September 2011 quarter led to an increase in annual nickel production. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year decreased by US$556 million to US$32 million. A 22 per cent decline in the average realised nickel price reduced Underlying EBIT by US$584 million, net of price-linked costs. At Nickel West Mt Keith, a reduction in mining activity and the commissioning of the Talc Redesign project delivered tangible cost benefits during the period. Construction of the new Kwinana hydrogen plant (Australia) was also completed in the 2012 financial year. Iron Ore BHP Billiton’s commitment to invest throughout the economic cycle delivered a twelfth consecutive annual production record in iron ore. WAIO shipments rose to a record annualised rate of 179 million tonnes in the June 2012 quarter (100 per cent basis). Consistently strong operating performance, the ramp up of Ore Handling Plant 3 at Yandi, dual tracking of the company’s rail infrastructure and additional ship loading capacity at Port Hedland contributed to the record result. Samarco’s (Brazil) three pellet plants continued to operate at capacity during the period.

15

News Release

Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year increased by US$873 million to a record US$14.2 billion. Outstanding financial performance was underpinned by record production at WAIO which increased Underlying EBIT by US$2.4 billion. This was partially offset by a seven per cent and five per cent decline in fines and lump prices, respectively, which reduced Underlying EBIT by US$1.3 billion, net of price-linked costs. While the acquisition of the HWE Mining subsidiaries in September 2012 eliminated third party contractor margin, one-off integration costs and an increase in exploration expense more than offset the cost savings achieved in the period. WAIO production is forecast to increase by approximately five per cent in the 2013 financial year. Commissioning of the WAIO Port Hedland Inner Harbour Expansion project remains on schedule for the second half of the 2012 calendar year and is expected to increase our inner harbour capacity to 220 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis). Subsequent debottlenecking opportunities that will enable us to maximise our capacity in the inner harbour continue to be assessed. Manganese Consistently strong operating performance and improved plant availability at both GEMCO (Australia) and Hotazel (South Africa) underpinned annual ore production and sales records in the 2012 financial year. Alloy production was substantially lower than the corresponding period following the termination of energy intensive silicomanganese production at Metalloys and the temporary suspension of production at TEMCO. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year decreased by US$462 million to US$235 million. A 22 per cent decline in the average realised price of ore and a 10 per cent decline in the average realised price of alloy reduced Underlying EBIT by US$400 million, net of price-linked costs. In contrast, record manganese ore sales increased Underlying EBIT by US$64 million. The US$167 million (BHP Billiton share) GEEP2 expansion project will further solidify GEMCO as one of the lowest cost and largest manganese mines in the industry. On completion, the GEEP2 project will increase processing capacity from 4.2 to 4.8 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) with first production anticipated on schedule in the second half of the 2013 calendar year. Metallurgical Coal A modest increase in metallurgical coal production was achieved in the 2012 financial year despite numerous operating challenges. Production at Queensland Coal remained constrained largely as a result of industrial action, weather related downtime and geotechnical issues at Gregory Crinum. Record annual production at Illawarra Coal (Australia) followed successful commissioning of the West Cliff Coal Preparation Plant upgrade project. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year decreased by US$1.1 billion to US$1.6 billion. Lower production and associated unit cost pressures at Queensland Coal reduced Underlying EBIT by US$1.1 billion. The progression of our development pipeline also led to an increase in exploration and business development costs in the period. In contrast, a six per cent increase in the price of hard coking coal increased Underlying EBIT by US$339 million, net of price-linked costs. In July 2012, force majeure was lifted across all BMA sites. In addition, BMA and the unions reached a framework agreement that should guide the finalisation of the BMA Enterprise Agreement. Further work is underway to finalise local mine site details. In response to the challenging external environment the Group has chosen to delay the 2.5 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) expansion of Peak Downs that is associated with the Caval Ridge mine development. The 5.5 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) Caval Ridge mine remains on schedule to deliver first production in the 2014 calendar year. Following a review of the Norwich Park mine’s profitability, BHP Billiton also announced the indefinite closure of this operation during the June 2012 quarter and is currently reviewing the viability of its other high-cost operations.

16

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Despite these actions, the capacity of our Queensland Coal business is expected to rise substantially by the end of the 2014 calendar year as all other projects remain on schedule and budget. BHP Billiton announced approval of the US$845 million Appin Area 9 project (Australia) in the period. This underground development is expected to sustain Illawarra Coal’s production capacity at nine million tonnes per annum with first production anticipated in the 2016 calendar year. Energy Coal Annual production records were achieved at two of BHP Billiton’s export oriented operations, Cerrejon Coal (Colombia) and New South Wales Energy Coal. The RX1 Project at New South Wales Energy Coal delivered first production during the June 2012 quarter, significantly ahead of schedule. This project capitalises on strong demand for high ash coal in our key growth markets. Underlying EBIT for the 2012 financial year increased by US$98 million to US$1.2 billion. Stronger volumes and a higher proportion of export sales, largely associated with improved rail performance at BECSA (South Africa) and the accelerated expansion of New South Wales Energy Coal, increased Underlying EBIT by US$152 million in the period. Higher average realised prices, most notably at Cerrejon Coal, contributed to a US$95 million increase in Underlying EBIT, net of price-linked costs. In contrast, higher labour and raw material costs contributed to a US$190 million reduction in Underlying EBIT. During the 2012 financial year, BHP Billiton approved a further eight million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis) expansion of the Cerrejon Coal mine. The US$437 million project (BHP Billiton share) will increase export capacity to approximately 40 million tonnes per annum (100 per cent basis), with first production anticipated on schedule in the 2013 calendar year. In addition, the partners approved the third phase of expansion of the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group’s (NCIG) coal handling facility in Newcastle (Australia). Group and Unallocated items The Underlying EBIT expense for Group and Unallocated in the 2012 financial year decreased by US$157 million to US$248 million. Higher corporate and information technology costs were more than offset by a foreign exchange related restatement and partial release of the Newcastle steelworks rehabilitation provision.

The following notes explain the terms used throughout this profit release: (1) Underlying EBIT is earnings before net finance costs, taxation and any exceptional items. Underlying EBITDA is Underlying EBIT before depreciation, impairments and amortisation of US$6,508 million for the year ended 30 June 2012 and US$5,113 million for the year ended 30 June 2011. We believe that Underlying EBIT and Underlying EBITDA provide useful information, but should not be considered as an indication of, or alternative to, Attributable profit as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Underlying EBIT is used to reflect the underlying performance of BHP Billiton’s operations. Underlying EBIT is reconciled to Profit from operations on page 8. Non-IFRS measures are defined as follows: • Attributable profit excluding exceptional items – comprises Profit after taxation attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group less exceptional items as described in note 2 to the financial report. • Underlying EBITDA interest coverage – for the purpose of deriving interest coverage, net interest comprises Interest on bank loans and overdrafts, Interest on all other borrowings, Finance lease and hire purchase interest less Interest income. • Underlying effective tax rate – comprises Total taxation expense excluding Royalty-related taxation, exceptional items and Exchange rate movements included in taxation expense divided by Profit before taxation and exceptional items. • Underlying EBIT margin – comprises Underlying EBIT excluding third party EBIT, divided by revenue excluding third party product revenue. • Underlying return on capital – represents net profit after tax, excluding exceptional items and net finance costs (after tax), divided by average capital employed. Capital employed is net assets less net debt. Net operating cash flows are after net interest and taxation.

(2) (3)

(4)

17

News Release

Forward looking statements This release contains forward looking statements, including statements regarding: trends in commodity prices and currency exchange rates; demand for commodities; plans, strategies and objectives of management; closure or divestment of certain operations or facilities (including associated costs); anticipated production or construction commencement dates; capital costs and scheduling; operating costs and shortages of materials and skilled employees; anticipated productive lives of projects, mines and facilities; provisions and contingent liabilities; tax and regulatory developments. Forward looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as ‘intend’, ‘aim’, ‘project’, ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘plan’, ‘believe’, ‘expect’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘will’, ‘continue’ or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations concerning the results of operations or financial condition, or provide other forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this release. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward looking statements. For example, our future revenues from our operations, projects or mines described in this release will be based, in part, upon the market price of the minerals, metals or petroleum produced, which may vary significantly from current levels. These variations, if materially adverse, may affect the timing or the feasibility of the development of a particular project, the expansion of certain facilities or mines, or the continuation of existing operations. Other factors that may affect the actual construction or production commencement dates, costs or production output and anticipated lives of operations, mines or facilities include our ability to profitably produce and transport the minerals, petroleum and/or metals extracted to applicable markets; the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the market prices of the minerals, petroleum or metals we produce; activities of government authorities in some of the countries where we are exploring or developing these projects, facilities or mines, including increases in taxes, changes in environmental and other regulations and political uncertainty; labour unrest; and other factors identified in the risk factors discussed in BHP Billiton’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (including in Annual Reports on Form 20-F) which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Except as required by applicable regulations or by law, the Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. Non-IFRS financial information BHP Billiton results are reported under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) including Underlying EBIT and Underlying EBITDA which are used to measure segment performance. This release also includes certain non-IFRS measures including Attributable profit excluding exceptional items, Underlying EBITDA interest coverage, Underlying effective tax rate, Underlying EBIT margin and Underlying return on capital. These measures are used internally by management to assess the performance of our business, make decisions on the allocation of our resources and assess operational management. Non-IFRS measures have not been subject to audit or review. No offer of securities Nothing in this release should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell BHP Billiton securities in any jurisdiction. Reliance on third party information The views expressed in this release contain information that has been derived from publicly available sources that have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. This release should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by BHP Billiton.

18

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Further information on BHP Billiton can be found on our website: www.bhpbilliton.com

Media Relations Australia Antonios Papaspiropoulos Tel: +61 3 9609 3830 Mobile: +61 477 325 803 email: Antonios.Papaspiropoulos@bhpbilliton.com Kelly Quirke Tel: +61 3 9609 2896 Mobile: +61 429 966 312 email: Kelly.Quirke@bhpbilliton.com Fiona Martin Tel: +61 3 9609 2211 Mobile: +61 427 777 908 email: Fiona.Martin2@bhpbilliton.com United Kingdom Ruban Yogarajah Tel: +44 20 7802 4033 Mobile: +44 7827 082 022 email: Ruban.Yogarajah@bhpbilliton.com Deirdra McCracken Tel: +44 20 7802 7462 Mobile: +44 7827 253 764 Email: Deirdra.S.McCracken@bhpbilliton.com Americas Jaryl Strong Tel: +1 713 499 5548 Mobile: +1 281 222 6627 email: Jaryl.Strong@bhpbilliton.com
BHP Billiton Limited ABN 49 004 028 077 Registered in Australia Registered Office: 180 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Tel +61 1300 55 4757 Fax +61 3 9609 3015

Investor Relations Australia James Agar Tel: +61 3 9609 2222 Mobile: +61 467 807 064 email: James.Agar@bhpbilliton.com Andrew Gunn Tel: +61 3 9609 3575 Mobile: +61 439 558 454 email: Andrew.Gunn@bhpbilliton.com United Kingdom and South Africa Tara Dines Tel: +44 20 7802 7113 Mobile: +44 7825 342 232 Email: Tara.Dines@bhpbilliton.com Americas Brendan Harris Tel: +44 20 7802 4131 Mobile: +44 7990 527 726 email: Brendan.Harris@bhpbilliton.com Matt Chism Tel: +1 713 599 6158 Mobile: +1 281 782 2238 email: Matt.E.Chism@bhpbilliton.com

BHP Billiton Plc Registration number 3196209 Registered in England and Wales Registered Office: Neathouse Place London SW1V 1BH United Kingdom Tel +44 20 7802 4000 Fax +44 20 7802 4111

Members of the BHP Billiton Group which is headquartered in Australia

19

News Release

This page is left blank intentionally

20

BHP Billiton Group Financial Information
For the year ended 30 June 2011 2012

Financial Information

Contents
Financial Information Page

Consolidated Income Statement ..................................................................................................................... 23 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income...................................................................................... 24 Consolidated Balance Sheet ........................................................................................................................... 25 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement................................................................................................................ 26 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity............................................................................................... 27 Notes to the Financial Information.................................................................................................................. 30
The financial information included in this document for the year ended 30 June 2012 is unaudited and has been derived from the draft financial report of the BHP Billiton Group for the year ended 30 June 2012. The financial information does not constitute the Group’s full financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2012, which will be approved by the Board, reported on by the auditors, and subsequently filed with the UK Registrar of Companies and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. The financial information set out on pages 21 to 43 for the year ended 30 June 2012 has been prepared on the basis of accounting policies consistent with those applied in the 30 June 2011 financial statements contained within the Annual Report of the BHP Billiton Group, except for a change to the basis on which borrowings are classified as current or noncurrent. Borrowings otherwise due for repayment within 12 months of balance date are now classified as non-current only if the committed refinancing facility is with the same lender and on the same or similar terms. Under the previous policy, it was not necessary for such facilities to be with the same party for the borrowings to be classified as noncurrent. This change in policy was adopted in light of amendments to IAS1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’ recommended by the IASB, modifying criteria for the classification of such borrowings as current. Borrowings of US$995 million drawn under the Group’s commercial paper program have therefore been classified as current with no impact on comparative amounts as the program was undrawn in all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The comparative figures for the financial years ended 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2010 are not the statutory accounts of the BHP Billiton Group for those financial years. Those accounts have been reported on by the company’s auditors and delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The reports of the auditors were (i) unqualified, (ii) did not include a reference to any matters to which the auditors drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying their report and (iii) did not contain a statement under Section 498(2) or (3) of the UK Companies Act 2006. All amounts are expressed in US dollars unless otherwise stated. The BHP Billiton Group’s presentation currency and the functional currency of the majority of its operations is US dollars as this is the principal currency of the economic environment in which it operates. Where applicable, comparative figures have been adjusted to disclose them on the same basis as the current period figures. Amounts in this financial information have, unless otherwise indicated, been rounded to the nearest million dollars.

22

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Consolidated Income Statement for the year ended 30 June 2012

Notes

Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M

Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M

Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M

Revenue Group production Third party products Revenue Other income Expenses excluding net finance costs Profit from operations Comprising: Group production Third party products

1

68,747 3,479 72,226 906 (49,380) 23,752

67,903 3,836 71,739 531 (40,454) 31,816

48,193 4,605 52,798 528 (33,295) 20,031

23,626 126 23,752 4 4 4 225 (955) (730) 23,022 (7,238) (252) (7,490) 15,532 115 15,417 6 6 289.6 288.4

31,718 98 31,816 245 (806) (561) 31,255 (6,481) (828) (7,309) 23,946 298 23,648 429.1 426.9

19,920 111 20,031 215 (674) (459) 19,572 (6,112) (451) (6,563) 13,009 287 12,722 228.6 227.8

Financial income Financial expenses Net finance costs Profit before taxation Income tax expense Royalty-related taxation (net of income tax benefit) Total taxation expense Profit after taxation Attributable to non-controlling interests Attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group Earnings per ordinary share (basic) (US cents) Earnings per ordinary share (diluted) (US cents) Dividends per ordinary share – paid during the period (US cents) Dividends per ordinary share – declared in respect of the period (US cents)

5

7 7

110.0 112.0

91.0 101.0

83.0 87.0

The accompanying notes form part of this financial information.

23

Financial Information

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 30 June 2012

Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M Profit after taxation Other comprehensive income Actuarial losses on pension and medical schemes Available for sale investments: Net valuation (losses)/gains taken to equity Net valuation (gains)/losses transferred to the income statement Cash flow hedges: Losses taken to equity Realised losses transferred to the income statement Unrealised losses transferred to the income statement Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations taken to equity Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations transferred to the income statement Tax recognised within other comprehensive income Total other comprehensive income for the year Total comprehensive income Attributable to non-controlling interests Attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group The accompanying notes form part of this financial information. 15,532 (250) (32) (2) (320) − 205 19 − 89 (291) 15,241 117 15,124

Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M 23,946 (113) (70) (47) − − − 19 − 120 (91) 23,855 284 23,571

Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M 13,009 (38) 167 2 (15) 2 − 1 (10) 111 220 13,229 294 12,935

24

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 30 June 2012

Notes

30 June 2012 US$M

30 June 2011 US$M

ASSETS Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Other financial assets Inventories Assets classified as held for sale Current tax assets Other Total current assets Non-current assets Trade and other receivables Other financial assets Inventories Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Deferred tax assets Other Total non-current assets Total assets LIABILITIES Current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Liabilities classified as held for sale Other financial liabilities Current tax payable Provisions Deferred income Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Other financial liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Deferred income Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets EQUITY Share capital – BHP Billiton Limited Share capital – BHP Billiton Plc Treasury shares Reserves Retained earnings Total equity attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group Non-controlling interests Total equity

33

4,781 7,704 282 6,233 848 137 466 20,451 1,475 1,881 424 95,247 5,112 4,525 158 108,822 129,273

10,084 8,197 264 6,154


273 308 25,280 2,093 1,602 363 67,945 1,456 3,993 188 77,640 102,920

3

12,024 3,531 433 200 2,811 2,784 251 22,034 509 24,799 317 5,287 8,914 328 40,154 62,188 67,085

9,723 3,519


288 3,693 2,256 259 19,738 555 12,388 79 2,683 9,293 429 25,427 45,165 57,755

1,186 1,069 (533) 1,912 62,236 65,870 1,215 67,085

1,183 1,070 (623) 2,001 53,131 56,762 993 57,755

The accompanying notes form part of this financial information. 25

Financial Information

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 30 June 2012
Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M
Operating activities Profit before taxation Adjustments for: Non-cash exceptional items Depreciation and amortisation expense Net gain on sale of non-current assets Impairments of property, plant and equipment, financial assets and intangibles Employee share awards expense Financial income and expenses Other Changes in assets and liabilities: Trade and other receivables Inventories Trade and other payables Net other financial assets and liabilities Provisions and other liabilities Cash generated from operations Dividends received Interest received Interest paid Income tax refunded Income tax paid Royalty-related taxation paid Net operating cash flows Investing activities Purchases of property, plant and equipment Exploration expenditure Exploration expenditure expensed and included in operating cash flows Purchase of intangibles Investment in financial assets Investment in subsidiaries, operations and jointly controlled entities, net of their cash Payment on sale of operations Cash outflows from investing activities Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Proceeds from financial assets Proceeds from sale or partial sale of subsidiaries, operations and jointly controlled entities, net of their cash Net investing cash flows Financing activities Proceeds from interest bearing liabilities (Settlements)/proceeds from debt related instruments Repayment of interest bearing liabilities Proceeds from ordinary shares Contributions from non-controlling interests Purchase of shares by Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) trusts Share buy-back – BHP Billiton Limited Share buy-back – BHP Billiton Plc Dividends paid Dividends paid to non-controlling interests Net financing cash flows Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, net of overdrafts, at the beginning of the financial year Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, net of overdrafts, at the end of the financial year The accompanying notes form part of this financial information. 23,022 3,417 6,408 (116) 100 270 730 (481) 1,464 (208) (288) (18) (1,026) 33,274 25 127 (715) 530 (7,842) (1,015) 24,384 (18,385) (2,452) 1,602 (220) (341) (12,556) − (32,352) 159 151 6 (32,036) 13,287 (180) (4,280) 21 101 (424) − (83) (5,877) (56) 2,509 (5,143) 10,080 (56) 4,881

Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M
31,255 (150) 5,039 (41) 74 266 561 (384) (1,960) (792) 2,780 46 387 37,081 12 107 (562) 74 (6,025) (607) 30,080 (11,147) (1,240) 981 (211) (238) (4,807) − (16,662) 80 118 − (16,464) 1,374 222 (2,173) 32 − (469) (6,265) (3,595) (5,054) (90) (16,018) (2,402) 12,455 27 10,080

Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M
19,572 (255) 4,759 (114) 35 170 459 (265) (1,713) (571) 565 (90) (306) 22,246 20 99 (520) 552 (4,931) (576) 16,890 (9,323) (1,333) 1,030 (85) (152) (508) (156) (10,527) 132 34 376 (9,985) 567 103 (1,155) 12 335 (274) – – (4,618) (277) (5,307) 1,598 10,831 26 12,455

26

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 June 2012

For the year ended 30 June 2012 US$M

Share capital – BHP Billiton Limited

Attributable to members of the BHP Billiton Group Share Treasury Reserves Retained capital shares earnings – BHP Billiton Plc

Total equity attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group 56,762 15,417 (253) (32) (2) (320) 205 19 90 15,124 3 − (424) 29 − 270 (5,894) − 65,870

Noncontrolling interests

Total equity

Balance as at 1 July 2011 Profit after taxation Other comprehensive income: Actuarial (losses)/gains on pension and medical schemes Net valuation losses on available for sale investments taken to equity Net valuation gains on available for sale investments transferred to the income statement Losses on cash flow hedges taken to equity Unrealised losses on cash flow hedges transferred to the income statement Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations taken to equity Tax recognised within other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income Transactions with owners: Proceeds from the issue of shares BHP Billiton Plc shares cancelled Purchase of shares by ESOP trusts Employee share awards exercised net of employee contributions Employee share awards forfeited Accrued employee entitlement for unvested awards Dividends Equity contributed Balance as at 30 June 2012
The accompanying notes form part of this financial information.

1,183 − − − − − − − − − 3 − − − − − − − 1,186

1,070 − − − − − − − − − − (1) − − − − − − 1,069

(623) − − − − − − − − − − 83 (424) 431 − − − − (533)

2,001 − − (32) (2) (320) 205 19 (33) (163) − 1 − (189) (8) 270 − − 1,912

53,131 15,417 (253) − − − − − 123 15,287 − (83) − (213) 8 − (5,894) − 62,236

993 115 3 − − − − − (1) 117 − − − − − − (56) 161 1,215

57,755 15,532 (250) (32) (2) (320) 205 19 89 15,241 3 − (424) 29 − 270 (5,950) 161 67,085

27

Financial Information

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 June 2012 (continued)

For the year ended 30 June 2011 US$M Share capital – BHP Billiton Limited

Attributable to members of the BHP Billiton Group Share capital – BHP Billiton Plc Treasury shares Reserves Retained earnings Total equity attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group 48,525 23,648 (105) (71) (38) 19 118 23,571 (6,345) (3,678) − (469) 39 − 266 (21) (5,126) − 56,762 Noncontrolling interests Total equity

Balance as at 1 July 2010 Profit after taxation Other comprehensive income: Actuarial losses on pension and medical schemes Net valuation (losses)/gains on available for sale investments taken to equity Net valuation gains on available for sale investments transferred to the income statement Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations taken to equity Tax recognised within other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income Transactions with owners: BHP Billiton Limited shares bought back and cancelled BHP Billiton Plc shares bought back BHP Billiton Plc shares cancelled Purchase of shares by ESOP trusts Employee share awards exercised net of employee contributions Employee share awards forfeited Accrued employee entitlement for unvested awards Distribution to option holders Dividends Equity contributed Balance as at 30 June 2011

1,227 − − − − − − − (44) − − − − − − − − − 1,183

1,116 − − − − − − − − − (46) − − − − − − − 1,070

(525) − − − − − − − − (3,678) 3,595 (469) 454 − − − − − (623)

1,906 − − (71) (38) 19 24 (66) − − 46 − (121) (9) 266 (21) − − 2,001

44,801 23,648 (105) − − − 94 23,637 (6,301) − (3,595) − (294) 9 − − (5,126) − 53,131

804 298 (8) 1 (9) − 2 284 − − − − − − − (17) (90) 12 993

49,329 23,946 (113) (70) (47) 19 120 23,855 (6,345) (3,678) − (469) 39 − 266 (38) (5,216) 12 57,755

28

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 June 2012 (continued)

For the year ended 30 June 2010 US$M

Share capital – BHP Billiton Limited

Attributable to members of the BHP Billiton Group Share Treasury Reserves Retained capital shares earnings – BHP Billiton Plc

Total equity attributable to members of BHP Billiton Group 39,954 12,722 (38) 160 2 (15) 2 1 (10) 111 12,935 (274) 8 – 170 43 (10) (4,618) 317 48,525

Noncontrolling interests

Total equity

Balance as at 1 July 2009 Profit after taxation Other comprehensive income: Actuarial losses on pension and medical schemes Net valuation gains on available for sale investments taken to equity Net valuation losses on available for sale investments transferred to the income statement Losses on cash flow hedges taken to equity Realised losses on cash flow hedges transferred to the income statement Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations taken to equity Exchange fluctuations on translation of foreign operations transferred to the income statement Tax recognised within other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income Transactions with owners: Purchase of shares by ESOP trusts Employee share awards exercised net of employee contributions Employee share awards forfeited Accrued employee entitlement for unvested awards Issue of share options to non-controlling interests Distribution to option holders Dividends Equity contributed Balance as at 30 June 2010

1,227 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1,227

1,116 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1,116

(525) – – – – – – – – – – (274) 274 – – – – – – (525)

1,305 – – 160 2 (15) 2 1 (10) 57 197 – (88) (28) 170 43 (10) – 317 1,906

36,831 12,722 (38) – – – – – – 54 12,738 – (178) 28 – – – (4,618) – 44,801

757 287 – 7 – – – – – – 294 – – – – 16 (6) (277) 20 804

40,711 13,009 (38) 167 2 (15) 2 1 (10) 111 13,229 (274) 8 – 170 59 (16) (4,895) 337 49,329

29

Financial Information

Notes to the Financial Information 1. Segment reporting

The Group has nine reportable segments aligned with the commodities which we extract and market, reflecting the structure used by the Group’s management to assess the performance of the Group: Reportable segment Petroleum Aluminium Principal activities Exploration, development and production of oil and gas Mining of bauxite, refining of bauxite into alumina and smelting of alumina into aluminium metal Mining of copper, silver, lead, zinc, molybdenum, uranium and gold Mining of diamonds and titanium minerals; potash development Mining and production of nickel products Mining of iron ore Mining of manganese ore and production of manganese metal and alloys Mining of metallurgical coal Mining of thermal (energy) coal

Base Metals Diamonds and Specialty Products Stainless Steel Materials Iron Ore Manganese Metallurgical Coal Energy Coal

Group and unallocated items represent Group centre functions. Exploration and technology activities are recognised within relevant segments. It is the Group’s policy that inter-segment sales are made on a commercial basis.

30

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

1.
US$M

Segment reporting (continued)
Petroleum (c) Aluminium Base Metals Diamonds and Specialty Products Stainless Steel Materials Iron Ore Manganese Metallurgical Coal Energy Coal Group and unallocated items/ eliminations BHP Billiton Group

Year ended 30 June 2012 Revenue Group production Third party products Rendering of services Inter-segment revenue Total revenue (a) Underlying EBITDA (b) Depreciation and amortisation Impairment (losses)/reversals Underlying EBIT (b) Comprising: Group production Third party products (b) Underlying EBIT Net finance costs Exceptional items Profit before taxation Capital expenditure Total assets (c) Total liabilities
(a) (b) (c)

12,616 230 91

3,279 1,487

11,162 434

1,326 –

2,919 60


12,937 9,415 (2,916) (151) 6,348 6,345 3 6,348

– –
4,766 25 (316) – (291) (292) 1 (291)

– –
11,596 4,687 (793) 71 3,965 3,982 (17) 3,965

– –
1,326 353 (154)


14 2,993 425 (393)

22,156 86 320 39 22,601 15,027 (826)

2,136 16 – – 2,152 359 (102) (22) 235 231 4 235

7,569 – 7 – 7,576 1,991 (423) 2 1,570 1,570 – 1,570

5,155 856 11 – 6,022 1,601 (374)

– 310 – (53) 257 (137) (111)

68,318 3,479 429 – 72,226 33,746 (6,408) (100) 27,238 27,112 126 27,238 (730) (3,486) 23,022 20,223 129,273 62,188


199 199 – 199


32 18 14 32


14,201 14,170 31 14,201


1,227 1,137 90 1,227


(248) (248) – (248)

5,830 38,461 5,763

852 9,931 1,371

2,650 17,638 3,627

598 3,468 1,033

513 4,513 1,391

5,634 22,726 4,024

418 2,556 1,100

2,808 9,406 2,561

893 7,067 2,636

27 13,507 38,682

Revenue not attributable to reportable segments comprises sales of freight and fuel to third parties. Underlying EBIT is earnings before net finance costs, taxation and any exceptional items. Underlying EBITDA is Underlying EBIT, before depreciation, amortisation and impairments. Total assets in Petroleum increased from US$18.7 billion at 30 June 2011 to US$38.5 billion at 30 June 2012, predominantly arising from the acquisition of Petrohawk Energy Corporation – refer to note 10.

31

Financial Information

1.
US$M

Segment reporting (continued)
Petroleum Aluminium Base Metals Diamonds and Specialty Products Stainless Steel Materials Iron Ore Manganese Metallurgical Coal Energy Coal Group and unallocated items/ eliminations BHP Billiton Group

Year ended 30 June 2011 Revenue Group production Third party products Rendering of services Inter-segment revenue Total revenue (a) Underlying EBITDA (b) Depreciation and amortisation Impairment (losses)/reversals Underlying EBIT (b) Comprising: Group production Third party products Underlying EBIT (b) Net finance costs Exceptional items Profit before taxation Capital expenditure Total assets Total liabilities

10,603 127 2 5 10,737 8,319 (1,913) (76) 6,330 6,325 5 6,330

3,601 1,620 – – 5,221 596 (330) – 266 275 (9) 266

13,550 602 – – 14,152 7,525 (735) – 6,790 6,796 (6) 6,790

1,517 – – – 1,517 779 (192) – 587 587 – 587

3,698 158 – 5 3,861 990 (404) 2 588 583 5 588

20,182 93 98 39 20,412 13,946 (618) – 13,328 13,296 32 13,328

2,423 – – – 2,423 780 (83) – 697 697 – 697

7,565 – 8 – 7,573 3,027 (357) – 2,670 2,670 – 2,670

4,651 851 5 – 5,507 1,469 (340) – 1,129 1,058 71 1,129

– 385 – (49) 336 (338) (67) – (405) (405) – (405)

67,790 3,836 113 – 71,739 37,093 (5,039) (74) 31,980 31,882 98 31,980 (561) (164) 31,255 11,610 102,920 45,165

1,984 18,674 4,529

1,329 9,602 1,606

1,404 15,973 3,118

319 2,833 664

651 4,912 1,579

3,627 17,585 3,652

276 2,439 1,049

1,172 6,731 2,088

754 6,176 2,386

94 17,995 24,494

32

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

1.
US$M

Segment reporting (continued)
Petroleum Aluminium Base Metals Diamonds and Specialty Products Stainless Steel Materials Iron Ore Manganese Metallurgical Coal Energy Coal Group and unallocated items/ eliminations BHP Billiton Group

Year ended 30 June 2010 Revenue Group production Third party products Rendering of services Inter-segment revenue Total revenue (a) Underlying EBITDA (b) Depreciation and amortisation Impairment (losses)/reversals Underlying EBIT (b) Comprising: Group production Third party products Underlying EBIT (b) Net finance costs Exceptional items Profit before taxation Capital expenditure Total assets Total liabilities

8,682 86 3 11 8,782 6,571 (1,998) – 4,573 4,570 3 4,573

2,948 1,405 – – 4,353 684 (278) – 406 393 13 406

9,528 881 – – 10,409 5,393 (729) (32) 4,632 4,639 (7) 4,632

1,272 – – – 1,272 648 (163) – 485 485 – 485

3,311 306 – – 3,617 1,085 (427) 10 668 646 22 668

10,964 67 69 39 11,139 6,496 (495) – 6,001 6,003 (2) 6,001

2,143 7 – – 2,150 784 (72) – 712 717 (5) 712

6,019 – 40 – 6,059 2,363 (309) (1) 2,053 2,053 – 2,053

3,214 1,051 – – 4,265 971 (228) (13) 730 642 88 730

– 802 – (50) 752 (482) (60) 1 (541) (540) (1) (541)

48,081 4,605 112 – 52,798 24,513 (4,759) (35) 19,719 19,608 111 19,719 (459) 312 19,572 9,766 88,852 39,523

1,951 12,733 3,175

1,019 8,078 1,318

763 14,970 2,621

127 2,588 527

265 4,507 1,154

3,838 13,592 2,526

182 2,082 794

653 5,597 1,475

881 5,425 1,965

87 19,280 23,968

33

Financial Information

2.

Exceptional items
Gross US$M (2,835) (449) (502) 300 – (3,486) Tax US$M 996 94 108 (90) 637 1,745 Net US$M (1,839) (355) (394) 210 637 (1,741)

Year ended 30 June 2012 Exceptional items by category Impairment of Fayetteville goodwill and other assets Impairment of Nickel West goodwill and other assets Suspension or early closure of operations and the change in status of specific projects (a) Settlement of insurance claims (a) Recognition of deferred tax assets on enactment of MRRT and PRRT extension legislation in Australia

(a) Includes amounts attributable to non-controlling interests of US$(34) million (US$7 million tax expense).

Impairment of Fayetteville goodwill and other assets: As a result of the fall in United States domestic gas prices and the company’s decision to adjust its development plans, the Group has recognised impairments of goodwill and other assets in relation to its Fayetteville shale gas assets. A total impairment charge of US$2,835 million (US$996 million tax benefit) was recognised in the year ended 30 June 2012. Impairment of Nickel West goodwill and other assets: The Group has recognised impairments of goodwill and other assets at Nickel West as a result of the continued downturn in the nickel price and margin deterioration. A total impairment charge of US$449 million (US$94 million tax benefit) was recognised in the year ended 30 June 2012. Suspension or early closure of operations and the change in status of specific projects: As part of our regular portfolio review, various operations and projects around the Group have either been suspended, closed early or changed in status. These include: the change in status of the Olympic Dam expansion project; the temporary suspension of production at TEMCO and the permanent closure of the Metalloys South Plant in South Africa; the indefinite cessation of production at Norwich Park; and the suspension of other minor capital projects. As a result, impairment charges of US$422 million (US$84 million tax benefit), idle capacity costs and inventory write-down of US$40 million (US$12 million tax benefit) and other restructuring costs of US$40 million (US$12 million tax benefit) were recognised in the year ended 30 June 2012. Settlement of insurance claims: During 2008, extreme weather across the central Queensland coalfields affected production from the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) and BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal (BMC) operations. The Group settled insurance claims in respect of the lost production and insurance claim income of US$300 million (US$90 million tax expense) was recognised in the year ended 30 June 2012. Recognition of deferred tax assets on enactment of MRRT and PRRT extension legislation in Australia: The Australian MRRT and PRRT extension legislation were enacted in March 2012. Under the legislation, the Group is entitled to a deduction against future MRRT and PRRT liabilities based on the market value of its coal, iron ore and petroleum assets. A deferred tax asset, and an associated net income tax benefit of US$637 million, was recognised in the year ended 30 June 2012 to reflect the future deductibility of these market values for MRRT and PRRT purposes, to the extent they are considered recoverable.

34

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

2.

Exceptional items (continued)
Gross US$M (314) 150 – – (164) Tax US$M – (45) 718 1,455 2,128 Net US$M (314) 105 718 1,455 1,964

Year ended 30 June 2011 Exceptional items by category Withdrawn offer for PotashCorp Newcastle steelworks rehabilitation Release of income tax provisions Reversal of deferred tax liabilities

Withdrawn offer for PotashCorp: The Group withdrew its offer for PotashCorp on 15 November 2010 following the Board’s conclusion that the condition of the offer relating to receipt of a net benefit as determined by the Minister of Industry under the Investment Canada Act could not be satisfied. The Group incurred fees associated with the US$45 billion debt facility (US$240 million), investment bankers’, lawyers’ and accountants’ fees, printing expenses and other charges (US$74 million) in progressing this matter during the period up to the withdrawal of the offer, which were expensed as operating costs in the year ended 30 June 2011. Newcastle steelworks rehabilitation: The Group recognised a decrease of US$150 million (US$45 million tax charge) to rehabilitation obligations in respect of former operations at the Newcastle steelworks (Australia) following a full review of the progress of the Hunter River Remediation Project and estimated costs to completion. Release of income tax provisions: The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) issued amended assessments in prior years denying bad debt deductions arising from the investments in Beenup and Boodarie Iron (both Australia) and the denial of capital allowance claims made on the Boodarie Iron project. The Group challenged the assessments and was successful on all counts before the Full Federal Court. The ATO obtained special leave in September 2010 to appeal to the High Court in respect of the denial of capital allowance claims made on the Boodarie Iron project. The Group’s position in respect of the capital allowance claims on the Boodarie Iron project was confirmed by the High Court in June 2011. As a result of these appeals, US$138 million was released from the Group’s income tax provision in September 2010 and US$580 million in June 2011. Reversal of deferred tax liabilities: Consistent with the functional currency of the Group’s operations, eligible Australian entities elected to adopt a US dollar tax functional currency from 1 July 2011. As a result, the deferred tax liability (DTL) relating to certain US dollar denominated financial arrangements has been derecognised, resulting in a credit to income tax expense of US$1,455 million.

35

Financial Information

2.

Exceptional items (continued)
Gross US$M 186 653 (298) (229) – 312 Tax US$M (53) (196) 12 50 128 (59) Net US$M 133 457 (286) (179) 128 253

Year ended 30 June 2010 Exceptional items by category Pinal Creek rehabilitation Disposal of Ravensthorpe nickel operations Restructuring of operations and deferral of projects Renegotiation of power supply agreements Release of income tax provisions

Pinal Creek rehabilitation: On 22 February 2010 a settlement was reached in relation to the Pinal Creek (US) groundwater contamination which resulted in other parties taking on full responsibility for ground water remediation and partly funding the Group for past and future rehabilitation costs. As a result, a gain of US$186 million (US$53 million tax expense) was recognised reflecting the release of rehabilitation provisions and cash received. Disposal of Ravensthorpe nickel operations: On 9 December 2009, the Group announced it had signed an agreement to sell the Ravensthorpe nickel operations (Australia). The sale was completed on 10 February 2010. As a result of the sale, impairment charges recognised as exceptional items in the financial year ended 30 June 2009 were partially reversed totalling US$611 million (US$183 million tax expense). In addition, certain obligations that remained with the Group were mitigated and related provisions released; together with minor net operating costs this resulted in a gain of US$42 million (US$13 million tax expense). Restructuring of operations and deferral of projects: Continuing power supply constraints impacting the Group’s three Aluminium smelter operations in southern Africa, and temporary delays with the Guinea Alumina project, gave rise to charges for the impairment of property, plant and equipment and restructuring provisions. A total charge of US$298 million (US$12 million tax benefit) was recognised by the Group in the year ended 30 June 2010. Renegotiation of power supply arrangements: Renegotiation of long term power supply arrangements in southern Africa impacted the value of embedded derivatives contained within those arrangements. A total charge of US$229 million (US$50 million tax benefit) was recognised by the Group in the year ended 30 June 2010. Release of income tax provisions: The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) issued amended assessments in prior years denying bad debt deductions arising from the investments in Hartley, Beenup and Boodarie Iron and the denial of capital allowance claims made on the Boodarie Iron project. BHP Billiton lodged objections and was successful on all counts in the Federal Court and the Full Federal Court. The ATO has not sought to appeal the Boodarie Iron bad debt disallowance to the High Court which resulted in a release of US$128 million from the Group’s income tax provisions. The ATO sought special leave to appeal to the High Court in relation to the Beenup bad debt disallowance and the denial of the capital allowance claims on the Boodarie Iron project and was granted special leave only in relation to the denial of the capital allowance claims on the Boodarie Iron project.

36

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

3.

Interests in jointly controlled entities
Contribution to profit after taxation Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M (5) 553 1,367 909 294 145 3,263 Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M 66 602 2,694 906 231 (172) 4,327 Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M 4 438 2,175 430 172 (145) 3,074

Major shareholdings in jointly Ownership interest at BHP Billiton Group (a) controlled entities reporting date 30 June 2012 % 47.1 33.75 57.5 50 33.33 30 June 2011 % 47.1 33.75 57.5 50 33.33 30 June 2010 % 47.1 33.75 57.5 50 33.33

Mozal SARL Compañia Minera Antamina SA Minera Escondida Limitada Samarco Mineração SA Carbones del Cerrejόn LLC Other (b) Total
(a)

The ownership interest at the Group’s and the jointly controlled entity’s reporting date are the same. When the annual financial reporting date is different to the Group’s, financial information is obtained as at 30 June in order to report on a basis consistent with the Group’s reporting date. Includes the Group’s effective interest in the Richards Bay Minerals joint venture of 37.76 per cent (30 June 2011: 37.76 per cent; 30 June 2010: 37.76 per cent), the Guinea Alumina project (ownership interest 33.3 per cent; 30 June 2011: 33.3 per cent; 30 June 2010: 33.3 per cent), the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd (ownership interest 35.5 per cent; 30 June 2011: 35.5 per cent; 30 June 2010: 35.5 per cent) and other immaterial jointly controlled entities.

(b)

Assets held for sale: In February 2012 the Group announced it had exercised an option to sell its non-operated interest in Richards Bay Minerals to Rio Tinto. The remaining assets and liabilities of the Richards Bay Minerals joint venture were classified as current assets held for sale of US$848 million (predominantly comprising cash and cash equivalents of US$120 million, trade and other receivables of US$196 million, inventories of US$128 million and property, plant and equipment of US$369 million), and as current liabilities held for sale of US$433 million (predominantly comprising trade and other payables of US$153 million, interest bearing liabilities of US$178 million and tax liabilities of US$67 million) at 30 June 2012.

4.

Net finance costs
Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M 19 471 12 – 411 128 (256) (140) 110 51 806 (141) (104) (245) 561 Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M 24 460 14 – 359 130 (301) 131 (138) (5) 674 (117) (98) (215) 459

Financial expenses Interest on bank loans and overdrafts Interest on all other borrowings Finance lease and hire purchase interest Dividends on redeemable preference shares Discounting on provisions and other liabilities Discounting on post-retirement employee benefits (a) Interest capitalised Fair value change on hedged loans Fair value change on hedging derivatives Exchange variations on net debt Financial income Interest income Expected return on pension scheme assets

22 696 37 – 481 129 (314) 345 (376) (65) 955 (122) (103) (225) 730

Net finance costs
(a)

Interest has been capitalised at the rate of interest applicable to the specific borrowings financing the assets under construction or, where financed through general borrowings, at a capitalisation rate representing the average interest rate on such borrowings. For the year ended 30 June 2012 the capitalisation rate was 2.83 per cent (30 June 2011: 2.87 per cent; 30 June 2010: 3.5 per cent).

37

Financial Information

5.

Taxation
Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M

Taxation expense including royalty related taxation UK taxation expense Australian taxation expense Overseas taxation expense Total taxation expense

(21) 6,043 1,468 7,490

21 3,503 3,785 7,309

178 3,798 2,587 6,563

Total taxation expense including royalty-related taxation, exceptional items and exchange rate movements, was US$7,490 million, representing an effective rate of 32.5 per cent (30 June 2011: 23.4 per cent; 30 June 2010: 33.5 per cent). Exchange rate movements increased taxation expense by US$250 million (30 June 2011: decrease of US$1,473 million; 30 June 2010: increase of US$106 million). The reduced impact compared to the year ended 30 June 2011 is predominantly due to eligible Australian entities electing to adopt a US dollar tax functional currency from 1 July 2011. Exceptional items decreased taxation expense by US$1,745 million (30 June 2011: decrease of US$2,128 million; 30 June 2010: increase of US$59 million) predominantly due to the recognition of tax benefits of US$1,193 million arising from the impairment of goodwill and other assets in relation to the Fayetteville shale gas assets, the Nickel West assets and the Olympic Dam Project assets; and the recognition of a net income tax benefit of US$637 million on enactment of the MRRT and PRRT extension legislation in Australia. Government imposed royalty arrangements calculated by reference to profits after adjustment for temporary differences are reported as royalty related taxation. Royalty-related taxation (excluding exceptional items) contributed US$889 million to taxation expense representing an effective rate of 3.9 per cent (30 June 2011: US$828 million and 2.6 per cent; 30 June 2010: US$451 million and 2.3 per cent).

6.

Earnings per share
Year ended 30 June 2012 Year ended 30 June 2011 429.1 426.9 858.2 853.8 23,648 23,648 Year ended 30 June 2010 228.6 227.8 457.2 455.6 12,722 12,743

Basic earnings per ordinary share (US cents) Diluted earnings per ordinary share (US cents) Basic earnings per American Depositary Share (ADS) (US cents) (a) Diluted earnings per American Depositary Share (ADS) (US cents) (a) Basic earnings (US$M) Diluted earnings (US$M)

289.6 288.4 579.2 576.8 15,417 15,417

38

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

The weighted average number of shares used for the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share reconciles to the number used to calculate basic earnings per share as follows:
Year ended 30 June 2012 Million Weighted average number of shares Basic earnings per ordinary share denominator Shares and options contingently issuable under employee share ownership plans Diluted earnings per ordinary share denominator
(a) Each American Depositary Share represents two ordinary shares.

Year ended 30 June 2011 Million 5,511 29 5,540

Year ended 30 June 2010 Million 5,565 30 5,595

5,323 23 5,346

7.

Dividends
Year ended 30 June 2012 US$M Year ended 30 June 2011 US$M 3,076 2,003 – 5,079 Year ended 30 June 2010 US$M 2,787 1,831 – 4,618

Dividends paid/payable during the period BHP Billiton Limited BHP Billiton Plc – Ordinary shares – Preference shares (a)

3,559 2,335 – 5,894

Dividends declared in respect of the period BHP Billiton Limited BHP Billiton Plc – Ordinary shares – Preference shares (a)
(a)

3,621 2,376 – 5,997

3,331 2,183 – 5,514

2,921 1,920 – 4,841

5.5 per cent dividend on 50,000 preference shares of £1 each declared and paid annually (30 June 2011: 5.5 percent; 30 June 2010: 5.5 percent).

Year ended 30 June 2012 US cents Dividends paid during the period (per share) Prior year final dividend Interim dividend 55.0 55.0 110.0

Year ended 30 June 2011 US cents 45.0 46.0 91.0

Year ended 30 June 2010 US cents 41.0 42.0 83.0

Dividends declared in respect of the period (per share) Interim dividend Final dividend

55.0 57.0 112.0

46.0 55.0 101.0

42.0 45.0 87.0

Dividends are declared after period end in the announcement of the results for the period. Interim dividends are declared in February and paid in March. Final dividends are declared in August and paid in September. Dividends declared are not recorded as a liability at the end of the period to which they relate. Subsequent to year end, on 22 August 2012, BHP Billiton declared a final dividend of 57.0 US cents per share (US$3,049 million), which will be paid on 28 September (30 June 2011: 55.0 cents per share – US$2,943 million; 30 June 2010: 45.0 US cents per share – US$2,504 million).

39

Financial Information

BHP Billiton Limited dividends for all periods presented are, or will be, fully franked based on a tax rate of 30 per cent.
2012 US$M 7,494 2,547 10,041 2011 US$M 3,971 3,218 7,189 2010 US$M 3,861 818 4,679

Franking credits as at 30 June Franking credits arising from the payment of current tax payable (a) Total franking credits available
(a)

The payment of the final 2012 dividend declared after 30 June 2012 will reduce the franking account balance by US$785 million.

8.

Share capital

On 15 November 2010, BHP Billiton announced the reactivation of the remaining US$4.2 billion component of its previously suspended US$13 billion buy-back program and subsequently announced an expanded US$10 billion capital management program on 16 February 2011. This expanded program was completed on 29 June 2011 through a combination of on-market and off-market buy-backs. As at 30 June 2011, there were 2,181,737 shares (US$83 million) in BHP Billiton Plc bought back on-market which were cancelled during the year ended 30 June 2012.

9.

Subsequent events

Other than the matters outlined elsewhere in this financial information, no matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year that have significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations, results of operations or state of affairs of the Group in subsequent accounting periods.

10.

Business combinations

Major business combinations completed during the year ended 30 June 2012 were: Petrohawk Energy Corporation On 14 July 2011, the Group announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Petrohawk Energy Corporation (Petrohawk) by means of an all-cash tender offer for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Petrohawk. The acquisition date of Petrohawk was 20 August 2011. Petrohawk is an oil and natural gas company based in the United States. It owns a number of shale gas assets in Texas and Louisiana and associated midstream pipeline systems. This acquisition provides the Group with operated positions in the resource areas of the Eagle Ford shale, Haynesville shale and the Permian Basin. Petrohawk was purchased for total consideration of US$12,005 million consisting of US$11,690 million for existing shares and US$315 million for settlement of outstanding options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights (collectively referred to as employee awards). The vesting of the employee awards was accelerated at the acquisition date pursuant to a change of control clause in the original employee award plans. As a result, all of the consideration for settlement of such awards was included in purchase consideration. The terms of the acquisition agreement did not include any contingent consideration. Acquisition related costs of US$46 million have been expensed and included in other operating expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement.

40

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

10.

Business combinations (continued)

Details of the business combination are as follows:
Provisional fair value reported at 31 December 2011 US$M ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables (a) Other financial assets Inventories (b) Property, plant and equipment (c) Intangibles – Goodwill Other assets Total assets LIABILITIES Trade and other payables Interest bearing liabilities Other financial liabilities Current tax payable Deferred tax liabilities (d) Provisions Total liabilities Net assets less non-controlling interest share of net assets Net assets acquired Gross consideration Cash and cash equivalents acquired Net consideration paid
(a) (b)

Adjustments to provisional fair value US$M – 5 – 1 (5,667) 3,591 – (2,070)

Final fair value US$M 10 327 240 60 15,350 3,591 68 19,646

10 322 240 59 21,017 – 68 21,716

645 3,800 7 62 5,049 88 9,651 12,065 (60) 12,005 12,005 (10) 11,995

(4) – – (5) (2,061) – (2,070) – – – – – –

641 3,800 7 57 2,988 88 7,581 12,065 (60) 12,005 12,005 (10) 11,995

The gross contractual amount for trade and other receivables was US$330 million of which US$3 million was not expected to be collected at acquisition date. The fair values were provisional at 31 December 2011 due to the complexity of the valuation process, particularly in relation to the valuation of the oil and gas properties and the accounting for the corresponding deferred tax liability. As a result, the provisional accounting did not separate any goodwill from the value of property, plant and equipment. Subsequent to 31 December 2011, management has obtained a final independent fair valuation of the oil and gas properties and adjusted the provisional value accordingly. Goodwill is calculated as a residual amount and the net impact of the above adjustments results in the recognition of goodwill of US$3,591 million. The difference between the allocated fair values of the oil and gas properties acquired and the corresponding tax base gives rise to a DTL. Reducing the valuation of the oil and gas properties gives rise to a corresponding reduction in the DTL.

(c) (d)

The goodwill of US$3,591 million is attributable to the expected synergies to be realised through managing the portfolio of both the acquired assets and the Group’s existing assets, and to the measurement of deferred income taxes based on nominal amounts rather than fair value. None of the goodwill recognised is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Group has entered into certain retention arrangements with the employees of Petrohawk. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Group will make retention payments at different intervals, subject to mandatory service requirements, and grant restricted share awards in BHP Billiton Limited with vesting dates ranging from 31 December 2012 to 22 August 2014. All retention benefits paid to employees will be accounted for as a postcombination employee benefits expense in the Consolidated Income Statement, of which US$56 million has been expensed since the acquisition date. From the date of the acquisition to 30 June 2012, revenue of US$1,740 million and a loss after taxation of US$136 million were included in the Consolidated Income Statement with regards to Petrohawk.

41

Financial Information

HWE Mining On 30 September 2011, the Group finalised the purchase of the HWE mining services business (HWE Mining), comprising three entities and other property, plant and equipment, which provide contract mining services to the Group’s Western Australian Iron Ore (WAIO) joint ventures, from Leighton Holdings Limited (Leighton Holdings). The acquisition was funded by the Group’s available cash and control was obtained through the purchase of all the issued share capital of the acquired entities. The acquisition relates to the mining equipment and related assets that service the Area C, Yandi and Orebody 23/25 operations and is consistent with the Group’s previously stated intention to move the WAIO business from contract mining to owner-operator mining. Acquisition related costs of US$17 million have been expensed and included in other operating expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement. Details of the business combination are as follows:
Provisional fair value reported at 31 December 2011 US$M ASSETS Trade and other receivables (a) Inventories Property, plant and equipment Intangibles – Goodwill Deferred tax assets Total assets LIABILITIES Interest bearing liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Provisions Deferred income Total liabilities Net assets acquired Consideration paid
(a)

Adjustments to provisional fair value US$M – – – 16 – 16

Final fair value US$M 7 44 380 187 9 627

7 44 380 171 9 611

109 – 31 22 162 449 449

– 16 – – 16 – –

109 16 31 22 178 449 449

This represents the gross contractual amount for trade and other receivables all of which is expected to be collected.

The consideration paid was in excess of the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities and therefore goodwill of US$187 million has been recognised in respect of the acquisition. The goodwill is attributable to the skilled work force and the expected synergies to result from an in-house mining workforce, improved safety and the management of costs. None of the goodwill recognised is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Prior to the acquisition, the Group and HWE Mining were parties to a contract under which HWE Mining supplied contract mining services to the Group. At the time of acquisition, the Group, as manager of the WAIO joint ventures, agreed to settle outstanding claims which amounted to US$241 million. This resulted in US$120 million being recognised in other operating expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement during the year ended 30 June 2012, with the remaining balance having been accrued for in prior periods. The settlement amount was based on mutually agreed claims using commercial rates and extinguished any right for Leighton Holdings to make retrospective claims for work performed prior to the acquisition date. A payment of US$20 million was made to Leighton Holdings for transitional services to be provided post acquisition. This payment was treated as a prepayment, included within other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and was amortised over its period of use.

42

BHP Billiton Financial Results for the year ended 30 June 2012

10.

Business combinations (continued)

From the date of the acquisition to 30 June 2012, revenue of US$1,064 million, which includes US$870 million of intercompany revenues, and a profit after taxation of US$101 million were included in the Consolidated Income Statement with regards to HWE Mining. Notional financial information The revenue and profit after taxation of the combined Group for the year ended 30 June 2012 as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of 1 July 2011 are US$72.6 billion and US$15.6 billion respectively. Business combination during the year ended 30 June 2011 Fayetteville Shale gas The financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2011 included disclosure of the provisional fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the Fayetteville Shale gas business acquired in March 2011. The fair values were provisional at 30 June 2011 due to the complexity of the valuation process. The provisional fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired approximated the consideration paid (US$4,819 million) and therefore no goodwill or bargain purchase gain was recognised at 30 June 2011. Subsequent to 30 June 2011, management has made the following adjustments to the business combination accounting:
Provisional fair value reported at 30 June 2011 US$M ASSETS Trade and other receivables Inventories Property, plant and equipment (a) Intangibles – Goodwill Total assets LIABILITIES Trade and other payables Provisions Total liabilities Net assets acquired Consideration paid
(a)

Adjustments to provisional fair value US$M – – (523) 552 29

Final fair value US$M 38 3 4,280 552 4,873

38 3 4,803 – 4,844

21 4 25 4,819 4,819

– 24 24 5 5

21 28 49 4,824 4,824

US$523 million adjustment to fair value of oil and gas properties is based on additional information relating to the condition of the properties at acquisition date. In particular, information about the minimum level of development activity required to retain the acreage.

The adjustments to the provisional fair values, which have been recognised by restating the 2011 comparative information, have resulted in recognition of goodwill of US$552 million. The goodwill of US$552 million was attributable to the synergies expected to be derived from market access and an assembled workforce at the field level. Goodwill recognised that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes is US$552 million. During the year ended 30 June 2012 goodwill and property, plant and equipment recognised as part of the Fayetteville business combination has been impaired – refer note 2 Exceptional Items.

43

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Marketing

...ASB-1104 Introduction to Marketing Assignment 1 In view of the dynamic nature of the marketing environment, to what extent do you consider consumers to be, in practice, central to marketing activities? Name: ZHUOMING AN Student No: 500356688 Tutor: David James Introduction What is marketing? The answer is not changeless. There are some different definitions about marketing. The Chartered Institute of Marketing define that "Marketing is the management process responsible for identifying, anticipating and satisfying consumers' requirements profitably." (CIM). Taking a concern into this definition, it indicates that marketing begins before a product or service is developed. In additional, it also explain that marketing involves identifying an unsatisfied consumer need or want and determining if a profitable opportunity exists. Another definition is that “A social and managerial process by which individuals and groups obtain what they need and want through creating and exchanging products and value with others." (Kotler et al., 2005). The basic idea of this definition is that core to all marketing activities is customer satisfaction, which means marketing is an ongoing process as consumer demands and the environment is constantly changing. Products need to adapt as demands change. At the same time, marketing does not involve misleading, tricking or manipulation the customer. The Jobber also define the marketing is "The achievement of corporate goals through meeting...

Words: 1933 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Marketing

...*/introduction Critically evaluates the marketing planning process Discusses impediments to effective implementation of marketing plan Introduction The leading exponents of the marketing planning have been warned of the communications factors, operational, cultural and managerial in which frequently impede the effective implementation of the marketing planning programmers in the past two decades. (Cravens, 1998; Doyle, 1998; Greenley, 1982; Leeflang and de Mortanges, 1996; McDonald, 1992a, b; 1995; Piercy and Morgan, 1994; Jain, 1993; Simkin, 1996a, b; Verhage and Waarts, 1988). There have some specific guidance are offered in the recent years to assist marketing managers overcoming those internal organisational and in pre-empting forces (cf. Cravens, 1998; Dibb et al., 1996; Lings, 1999; Piercy, 1997; 1998; Simkin, 2000). Yet, the recent research has shows barriers to the implementation of programmes and marketing strategies. (Dibb and Simkin, 2001; Simkin, 2000). Another key barrier is indicating impeding the deployment of effective marketing practices used to be the lack in most marketing function or either in organisations. (cf. McDonald, 1992a, b; Piercy and Morgan, 1994). The research are shows this is a no longer to the case with the bulkiness businesses professing to have a marketing department undertaking not only promotion and customer research,but are relate to the Kotleresque textbook approach to marketing management (Dibb and Simkin, 1997; Piercy...

Words: 1580 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Marketing

...A high-level data model in business or for any functional area is an abstract model that documents and organizes the business data for communication between functional and technical people. It is used to show the data needed and created by business processes. A data model in software engineering is an abstract model that documents and organizes the business data for communication between team members and is used as a plan for developing applications, specifically how data are stored and accessed. An entity-relationship model (ERM) is an abstract conceptual data model (or semantic data model) used in software engineering to represent structured data. There are several notations used for ERMs. Methodology: 1. Use E-R model to get a high-level graphical view of essential components of enterprise and how they are related 2. Then convert E-R diagram to SQL DDL, or whatever database model you are using E-R Model is not SQL based. It's not limited to any particular DBMS. It is a conceptual and semantic model – captures meanings rather than an actual implementation The E-R Model: The enterprise is viewed as set of * Entities * Relationships among entities Symbols used in E-R Diagram * Entity – rectangle * Attribute – oval * Relationship – diamond * Link - line Ellipsis (plural ellipses; from the Ancient Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis, "omission" or "falling short") is a series of dots that usually indicate an intentional omission of a word, sentence...

Words: 1759 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Defining Marketing Paper ShuMikki Stinson MKT/351 Thomas Collins August 26, 2013 Marketing is a tool that can help business owners to prosper with their product. Marketing can be defined as an instrument that is helpful to individuals to promote their goods in their unique way that other people items would not be an eye-catcher. It is vital to know that the key thing for every marketing tool that the individual uses will be used for the proper reasons. By the individual using marketing tools in the proper way, the individual will reach their marketing level in which they wish to be at. There are side effects when it comes to the marketing tools and the techniques which they do not work properly as it was intended too. There are numerous of definitions that relate to the marketing field. According to William D. Perreault, the author of Basic Marketing, the best definition of marketing is the performance of activities that seek to accomplish an organization’s objectives by anticipating customer or client needs and directing a flow of need satisfying goods and services from producer to customer or client. (William D. Perreault, 2011). Marketing is important because it can be a benefit for a business or a hardship. Respectable marketing methods can make a transformation between a concrete upsurges in sales to an impasse circumstances on a quality merchandise. Marketing can be as simple as having a general conversation, which is usually the case in the long run. Marketing is vital...

Words: 767 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Omar Rochell Marketing MKT/421 April 7, 2011 Nikki Jackson Introduction Marketing is exposed to someone every day, even when they do not seem realize it. Driving down the roads you see billboards everywhere and that is part of marketing. Logos people were on their shirts and signs in the middle or on the sign of football fields are all part of marketing. Even when a child is marketing themselves to their parents to borrow the car or go to a party they are marketing themselves to their parents in exchange for the car or the party. A set of activities that will benefit both parties’ objectives is my own personal definition of marketing. This paper will be defining marketing in different perspectives. Discussing the importance of marketing in a organizational success will also be discussed with examples included from different organizations. As an organization it is important to know what marketing is and how to establish success. What is Marketing “Marketing is defined as the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that will have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large.”(American Marketing Association, 2011) Marketing is a process that helps links the consumer, customer, and public to information that will help identify and market opportunities. Marketing research will generate, and evaluate different types of market actions, monitor marketing performance, and help improve...

Words: 1088 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Marketing

...focus inward on the organization’s needs instead of outward (the customer’s needs). • Product is aimed at everyone. • Firms want to profit through maximizing sales volume. • Promotion to achieve goals. 2. Describe some of the characteristics of a firm that would follow a marketing orientation. Marketing orientation is “a philosophy that assumes that a sale does not depend on an aggressive sales force but rather than on a customer’s decision to purchase a product; it is synonymous with the marketing concept.” • Unlike sales orientation, a firm would focus outward on the customers wants and needs. • The goal of a firm is to satisfy customers wants and needs and delivering superior value. • The target is specific groups of people. • Where sales orientation profits by sales volume, marketing orientation firms profit with good feedback from customers or customer satisfaction. • It’s more about marketing and less about selling (less persuasion). • Firms identify what customers want and have businesses give them what they want efficiently. 3. In what ways does McDonald's embody both a marketing and a societal marketing orientation? Do some internet research if necessary. McDonald’s embodies a marketing orientation...

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Marketing

...customer-focused and heavily committed to marketing. These companies share a passion for understanding and satisfying customer needs in well-defined target markets. They motivate everyone in the organization to help build lasting customer relationships based on creating value. Marketing is just as important for non-profit-making organizations as it is for profit-making ones. It is very important to realize that at the heart of marketing is the customer. It is the management process responsible for identifying, anticipating and satisfying consumer requirements profitability. Background The term ‘‘marketing’’ is derived from the word ‘‘market’’, which refers to a group of sellers and buyers that cooperate to exchange goods and services. The modern concept of marketing evolved during and after the revolution in the 19th and 20th centuries. During that period, the proliferation of goods and services, increased worker specialization and technological advances in transportation, refrigeration and other factors that facilitate the transfer of goods over long distances resulted in the need for more advance market mechanisms and selling techniques. But it was not until the 1930s that companies began to place a greater emphasis on advertising and promoting their products and began striving to tailor their goods to specific consumer needs. By the 1950s, many larger companies were sporting entire marketing departments charged with devising and implementing marketing strategies that would complement...

Words: 2190 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Marketing

...MARKETING PLAN RESEARCH DEFINITION: A marketing plan is a business document written for the purpose of describing the current market position of a business and its marketing strategy for the period covered by the marketing plan. Marketing plans usually have a life of from one to five years. PURPOSE: The purpose of creating a marketing plan is to clearly show what steps will be undertaken to achieve the business' marketing objectives. CONTENT OF MARKETING: A marketing plan for a small business typically includes Small Business Administration Description of competitors, including the level of demand for the product or service and the strengths and weaknesses of competitors. 1. Description of the product or service, including special features 2. Marketing budget, including the advertising and promotional plan 3. Description of the business location, including advantages and disadvantages for marketing 4. Pricing strategy 5. Market Segmentation The main contents in marketing plan are: * Executive Summary Brief statement of goals and recommendations based on hard data. * Environmental Analysis Presents data on the market, product, competition, distribution, macro-environment. (Product fact book) S.P.I.N.S. Situation “Where am I”, Problem identification/Implications “What is happening”, Needs Assessment “Why is it happening”, Solutions “What can I do about it” Market Situation: Data on target market, size and growth for past years...

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Marketing MKT 421 Marketing According to “American Marketing Association” (2013), “Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customer, clients, partners, and society at large.” The American Marketing Society has grown to be the largest marketing associations in the world. The members work, teach, and study in the field of marketing across the globe. Another definition of marketing is according to “About.com Investors” (2013), “Marketing is an activity. Marketing activities and strategies result in making products available that satisfy customers while making profits for the companies that offer those products.” Organizations success lies in marketing and it is the heart of the success. The marketing introduces a product or service to potential customers. An organization can offer the best service or product in the industry but the potential customers would not know about it without marketing. Sales could crash and organizations may close without marketing. For a business to succeed the product or service that is provided needs to be known to the potential buyers. Getting the word out is important part of marketing in any organizational success. Product or service awareness is created by marketing strategies. If marketing is not used the potential customers will never be aware of the organizational offerings and the organization will not have the opportunity to succeed...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marketing

...chapter 1 Marketing’s Role in the Global Economy When You Finish This Chapter, You Should 1. Know what marketing is and why you should learn about it. 2. Understand the difference between micro-marketing and macro-marketing. 3. Know why and how macromarketing systems develop. 4. Understand why marketing is crucial to economic development and our global economy. 5. Know why marketing special— ists—including middlemen and — facilitators—develop. 6. Know the marketing functions and who performs them. 7. Understand the important new terms (shown in red). www.mhhe. When it’s time to roll out of bed in the morning, does your General Electric alarm wake you with a buzzer—or by playing your favorite radio station? Is the station playing rock, classical, or country music—or perhaps a Red Cross ad asking you to contribute blood? Will you slip into your Levi’s jeans, your shirt from L. L. Bean, and your Reeboks, or does the day call for your Brooks Brothers interviewing suit? Will breakfast be Lender’s Bagels with cream cheese or Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes—made with grain from America’s heartland—or some extra large eggs and Oscar Mayer bacon cooked in a Panasonic microwave oven imported from Japan? Will you drink decaffeinated Maxwell House coffee—grown in Colombia—or some Tang instant juice? Will you eat at home or is this a day to meet a friend at the Marriott-run cafeteria—where you’ll pay someone else to serve your breakfast? After breakfast, will you head off to school...

Words: 14069 - Pages: 57

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Abstract In the world of today with rude competition everywhere, customers’ expectations have become higher than ever. It is not the customers who come towards the products but it is the products which should make their way to the customers. And for this, only competitive businesses that are able to stimulate customers’ interests survive in the market. Therefore firms need to increase customers’ awareness about their products or services to be able to pull and encourage them to engage in purchase of their products. And as such, the promotional mix used by a company is really important for this task. The promotional mix in itself is very broad, consisting of various tools, like advertising, personal selling, direct marketing, public relation and sales promotion. To make the optimum use of these tools, marketers usually select them, depending on their budget and objectives, as well as the sector in which they operate (Kotler & Armstrong 1997). As such, research has been conducted on the use of promotional mix and research questions and objectives have been set. The methodology which will be used has been devised. We shall be doing a descriptive study through a survey questionnaire, in which there will be open as well as close ended questions and the questionnaire will be administered through personal interview that is direct, face-to-face. The sample size will be 100 persons and will all be customers of J Kalachand & Co Ltd. After the research, we will be...

Words: 4233 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Marketing is the process of communicating the value of a product or service to customers, for the purpose of selling that product or service. Marketing can be looked at as an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, delivering and communicating value to customers, and customer relationship management that also benefits the organization. Marketing is the science of choosing target markets through market analysis and market segmentation, as well as understanding consumer behavior and providing superior customer value. From a societal point of view, marketing is the link between a society’s material requirements and its economic patterns of response. Marketing satisfies these needs and wants through exchange processes and building long term relationships. Organizations may choose to operate a business under five competing concepts: the production concept, the product concept, the selling concept, the marketing concept, and the holistic marketing concept.[1] The four components of holistic marketing are relationship marketing, internal marketing, integrated marketing, and socially responsive marketing. The set of engagements necessary for successful marketing management includes capturing marketing insights, connecting with customers, building strong brands, shaping the market offerings, delivering and communicating value, creating long-term growth, and developing marketing strategies and plans.[2] Marketing may be defined in several ways, depending on...

Words: 270 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Marketing

...oriented philosophy is so important. The phrase market-oriented is used in marketing conversations as an adjective describing a company with a marketing orientation. Market orientation more describes the company's approach to doing business. Market-oriented defines the company itself. If a company is market-oriented, its board and executive leadership believe that the best way to succeed is to prioritize the marketplace above products. This usually goes over well with customers, but the company also must have adequate research and development to provide what the market wants. Hence, a market-oriented organization is one whose actions are consistent with the marketing concept. Difference Between Marketing Orientation & Market Oriented by Neil Kokemuller, Demand Media http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-marketing-orientation-market-oriented-14387.html Marketing is a management process and management support for marketing concept is very important element in success. If a company wants to be successful then it is market oriented. Marketing involves identifying the customer requirements and estimate the customer requirements in future. It requires planning which is very important process of marketing. To satisfy the needs the business should provide benefits – offering right marketing at right time at right place. Generally market based companies adopt strategic level marketing that defines the mission and long term objectives of the company. Market oriented...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marketing

...qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer...

Words: 789 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marketing

...Assessment: MKC1 Market Environmental Variables Reading: Contemporary Marketing: Chapter 3 Questions: 1. How would you categorize Generation X using the five segments of the marketing environment? A: Competitive Environment B: Political-legal environment C: Economic environment D: Technological environment E: Social-cultural environment 2. Joe and Ryan both have storefronts in the local mall. Joe sells candies and Ryan sells pretzels. Are Joe and Ryan in direct competition with each other? A: Yes B: No Consumer Behavior and Marketing Reading: Contemporary Marketing: Chapter 5 Questions: 1. Rachel and Sarah’s parents always purchased groceries from the local Aldi marketplace. What is this type of behavior an example of? A: Cultural influences B: Social Influences C: Personal factors 2. Maryanne purchases Maxwell House coffee every two weeks from the grocery. What is this type of behavior an example of? A: Routinized Problem Solving B: Limited problem solving C: Extended problem solving 3. Aaron does research on several local colleges before applying to his first three choices. This is an example of: A: High – involvement purchase decision B: Low – involvement purchase decision Marketing Plans Reading: Contemporary Marketing: Chapter 2 + Ch. 2 Appendix Web sites: http://www.jpec.org/handouts/jpec33.pdf http://www.netmba.com/marketing/process/ Questions: 1. Strategies are designed to meet objectives...

Words: 8933 - Pages: 36