Free Essay

Media in the Courtroom

In: Social Issues

Submitted By jenniferrenee1
Words 1170
Pages 5
Media In The Courtroom

Media in the courtroom can profoundly change and alter the outcome of a trial by allowing society to form an opinion before justice prevails. How is that possible, from Judge Judy to the Supreme Court society wants to be involved by any means possible to give their opinion on how justice should prevail? The journalists and television companies sell this belief, they hide behind the first amendment rights to air and publish any information that in turn helps to sell their product. Society is blinded by the need to know mentality, they have not realized the end results may not end in their favor. The only time society sees an error in our system is when the error affects their lives. Reality T.V is a catalyst to this need to know mentality. Cameras, Television, Radio, Internet, and Journalists these are the instruments that set criminals free. Ladies and Gentlemen I intend to prove without a reason of doubt that media in the courtroom is detrimental to the process of a fair trial and a defendants right to due process.
As John Q public should be aware the justice system is a process to keep society safe, if they interfere with that process how can they say lady justice prevailed. Let’s say they have a defendant who has been accused of killing 10 people he has signed a confession of guilt and of course has hired a lawyer. First he is arrested and informed of his rights. Next they go into the courtroom where a judge informs him of his rights and his right to a fair trial and due process. Then he is given a jury of his peers and these jurors are instructed by our Judge not to speak about this case for if they do they are jeopardizing the defendant’s right to a fair trial and his due process. As you can see every step and precaution is taken to protect the rights of the accused. So you may be asking yourself, what is due process, in one word--fairness. (www.lectlaw.com/def/d080.htm)
Some of you may remember a landmark case known as the Simpson trials where a husband O.J Simpson was accused of killing his wife Nichole Brown and her friend Ron Goldman. The case was only hours old, no real detective work had begun, no charges had been pressed and the media jumped into action. Why because O.J Simpson was a Heisman trophy football player. His case did not start in a court room, it started with him being filmed driving the notorious white bronco down a freeway crying about his predicament. The media decided this was a story worth covering this was going to sell papers and boost ratings. Consequently taking us through every piece of evidence, every mishap, and every tear from the victim’s families, and showing us motherless children. How does that help decide if he is guilty or not guilty? The media then decided to put on their own courthouse proceedings via television, they tried him and the entire court proceeding each day showing us how pathetic a witness could be (by the defenses standards). How one racist cops out of hundreds at the scene was out to get O.J and how a goofy tenant did not know what he was talking about seeing O.J. run on the side of his home, but lets not forget the most notorious of the evidence the glove, if it could not fit we must acquit. The frenzy began t-shirts were made and society put him on trial in our living rooms. Did due process play into this scenario, did the media consider his Amendment Rights or were they concerned with what to put on the six o’clock news?
Additionally we are finding media in the courtroom changing venues and altogether changing the verdict this is a case in fact. In 1965, the United States Supreme Court held that Texas financier Bill Sol Estes had been denied his right to a fair trial because the court proceedings were televised. Journalists and their equipment had packed the courtroom. Legal scholars debated the scope of the Supreme Court’s opinion. Some contended the court had ruled that the mere presence in the courtroom of broadcast cameras and equipment automatically amounted to a denial of due process of law to a criminal defendant. Others, including some members of the court, suggested that the requirements of due process might not be offended as camera technology improved. The legal debate continued for years, during which broadcast reporters and newspaper photographers were generally unable to use cameras, microphones, and recorders to cover court proceedings. (www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/Forum/.../History.doc)
Media can argue their amendment rights but, in a democratic society, the supreme court has noted, the press fulfills the important function of informing the public about the judicial process consequently, the media carry the ethical obligation not to impair criminal trial proceedings deliberately Ultimately, the responsibility to ensure fairness rests with the trial court (Roshwalb 1994). The purpose of this is not only to protect a defendant but to protect a system that has been under scrutiny for centuries. As you can see due process is imperative to our justice system.
Finally in my opinion we have to ask ourselves why we need to know what is happening in someone else’s home? Does the media need to fill a void for our own morbid curiosity? Are they saying that our needs need to be fulfilled more so than those on trial? Are they willing to let a cold blooded murderer walk free to hurt again? After watching the news on a local murder here in my hometown of Modesto, Scott Peterson was well known here in town he murdered his wife and unborn child. Everyone here knew he had done it, a lot of us saw him on the phone laughing and carrying on while they searched for his missing pregnant wife. What I thought to myself at the time was no matter the outcome I would not read or involve myself into the case, I did not want to take the chance of being put onto that case and failing our system. After carefully viewing the information in regards to setting criminals free by allowing society to make the rules, I hope you too can see how detrimental it is to allow society to dictate the outcome of a trial. There is a system in place that ensures the accused the right to due process and a fair trial by his peers. We must stand strong against those who want to sabotage a system that has been in place for many centuries. Societies rights are not at issue in our courtrooms, a defendants rights are!

Citations and References

Websites: (www.lectlaw.com/def/d080.htm) (www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/Forum/.../History.doc)

Author citations: (Roshwalb 1994).

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Media and the Courtroom

...The Influence of Media in Judicial System The Influence of Media in Judicial System How many times has there been an innocent person released after more than a decade of serving in prison? Does media frenzy have an effective role in matters like this? Does everybody believe in the saying “innocent until proven guilty?” With much variety of media’s entertainments, public interest, as expected, has been increased, and it is still increasing. Despite the fact that it is good for people to be aware of what is going on around them, there has to be a line to how much media can interfere into life of others. The presence of media in the courtroom assures that people would be informed of how the legal system works besides of being an observer of a fair and unbiased trail. But their presence in the courtroom with cameras, tapes, and other especial equipments would cause more harm than benefit. Freedom of speech in addition to people’s interest in drama of the courtroom stimulates media’s curiosity in legal matters, and sometimes this curiosity will defy the privacy of others. Media’s influence on public and especially on jury repeatedly has caused the change of the verdict, an example of this influence is a case from Capital Defense Network; “Conviction for murders, armed robbery and attempted rape with a punishment of death was reversed and remanded for retrial because juror read news accounts detailing defendant's prior assault of a woman with a hammer...

Words: 2179 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Media in the Courtroom

...Media in the Courtroom COM 150 February 27, 2011 Media in the Courtroom In this day and age the public looks for information though the media to inform them on what is happening in the world today, but with all the different ways that we have to receive information via the newspaper, or TV news, should we also allow cameras onto our courtrooms? There have been several debates on whether or not cameras should be permitted in the courtroom during court proceedings even though the media feels that they have the right to inform the public about how the justice system works, while some feels that it is more for entertainment, and others feel that it is just an invasion of privacy on the part of the victim and the witnesses. In my paper I will examine both sides of the argument and leave it up to you to make your own decision on whether or not cameras should be allowed into the courtroom. The media has been reporting trials for decades by the use of newspapers and or radio. But in 1935 television broadcasted one of the first trials which they called “The Trial of the Century”. The trial that I am speaking about is the Lindbergh baby trial, it was a highly publicized trial that may have started the debated on whether or not cameras should be allowed into the courtrooms. From the day the trial started hundreds of reporters would flack to the court house in the town of Flemington, New Jersey. The media had gotten so out of control that judge Trenchard had to ban the use of all typewriters...

Words: 1177 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Cameras in Court Rooms

...Should Cameras Be Placed in Courtrooms So That Criminal Trials Can Be Televised? It is axiomatic in democracy that everyone has access to the justice system and has the right to know how those laws are enforced. This can be ensured by having trials in courtrooms televised. Whether to have cameras in courtrooms or not was a huge debate that began back in 1977 in Miami (May 2008). After a long debate higher court judges decided to allow trials to be televised in Miami. Those debates never ended because of different judges all over the world having different opinions. Personally speaking, cameras should be allowed in courtrooms so that criminal trials can be televised, to make it clear to people what circumstances they would face if they were to do anything illegal. In every country in the world laws are made in the parliament by the government in regards to the opinions of higher court judges. Many proceedings carried in the parliament are allowed to be televised so that citizens can know what the laws they should abide by are. The irony in televising parliament proceedings is that people are allowed to watch laws being made, but they cannot see how they are being enforced. If criminal trials are televised then people can know how those laws are being enforced and would be more cautious by restraining themselves from breaking the law. This is because they would know what the circumstances of their actions are, thanks to the televised criminal trials. In the United States...

Words: 907 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Tv Cameras in the Courtroom

...CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM. Term Paper ID:19839 Get This Paper Free! or Buy This Paper Essay Subject: Right to fair trial vs. right of public to witness court proceedings & know what govt. is doing.... More... 7 Pages / 1575 Words 5 sources, 11 Citations, MLA Format $28.00 More Papers on This Topic Paper Abstract: Right to fair trial vs. right of public to witness court proceedings & know what govt. is doing. Paper Introduction: SHOULD CAMERAS BE ALLOWED IN THE COURTROOM? Introduction and Problem Statement Although the title of this research is broad, cameras, in the context of this paper, refers to television cameras. Courts in different jurisdictions in the United States impose differing restrictions on media coverage within courtrooms. Some jurisdictions do not allow cameras of any kind, requiring even the print media to employ artist sketches for any visual reporting of courtroom proceedings. Others permit the use of still cameras under controlled conditions. Few jurisdictions permit the unrestricted use of television cameras in courtrooms. Most jurisdictions that do permit television cameras in the courtroom do not permit continuous live coverage of the proceedings. Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while...

Words: 2168 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Courthouse

...When we got to the third floor, there were two cases going on. One case had a “please be quiet” sign in front of the door, and all the observation seats in the courtroom were filled. The second case’s door was open and there was only one person observing, so we chose that one because it seemed less threatening. The courtroom was relatively small and the only people that were really in the room were people that needed to be present during the court hearing including the lawyers, witnesses, judge, court reporter and jury. There was only one other person observing besides the people I came with. Once we got settled into our seats, it was immediately obvious that the person was on defense for driving under the influence of alcohol. The witness currently on stand was the office who pulled the defendant over. The person asking him questions was the prosecuting attorney, who we later had the opportunity to interview. The prosecutor was asking the witness very detailed, specific and precise questions about the night of the DUI. These questions included asking about the surroundings and environment of that night, including where they were located and a description of the cement sidewalk where the sobriety tests were performed. The witness was also asked to describe, very specifically, which field sobriety tests he asked the defendant to perform. The three tests that he had described were the lack of smooth pursuit test, the Romberg Test and to stand on one leg. The lack of smooth...

Words: 966 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Omalley's Tavern

...An Assignment Submitted by Sara Cotleur Liberty University Online Class Business 301-D04, Section 201320, Spring 2013 Deborah White vs. John Daniels and O’Malley’s Tavern Introduction The case in question is case number 82A04-8876-CV-285, between Deborah White as the plaintiff and John Daniels and O'Malley's Tavern as defendants before a mock U.S. District Court, in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff’s attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jackson Walsh while those of the defendants are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. Mr. and Mrs. White went to O'Malley's Tavern on the Saturday, July 28, 2007, a tavern in Gary, Indiana. Edward Hard, a former fiancé of Mrs. White was also patronizing the same tavern and on seeing the two, he approached them to convey his congratulations on their recent marriage and then went back to his seat and resumed his drinks. The first defendant, Mr. Daniels, was the only licensed bartender working at O'Malley's Tavern. Mrs. White and Mr. Daniels confirmed Mr. Hard consumed four to six shots in about twenty-eight minutes after the arrival of the Whites. Thus Mr. Daniels had constructive knowledge of Mr. Hard’s intoxication. On consuming his last alcoholic drink he tried to leave and in the process tripped on a cue stick as he stood up but picked himself up. Mr. Daniel did not notice this stumbling incident and thus was not aware of the intoxication level of Mr. Hard and could not be said to have absolute knowledge on...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Introduction to Policing

...infallible statements of right/wrong, and they should not be used as grading elements. Also, at present, WritePoint cannot detect quotations or block-quotes, so comments in those areas should be ignored. Please see the other helpful writing resources in the Tutorials and Guides section of the Center for Writing Excellence. Thank you for using WritePoint. Courtroom [Make sure paragraph indentation is five to seven spaces or one tab stop] Work Group Mary C. Thomas CJ\204 October 15, 2012 Kimberly Haney Courtroom Work Group This paper will [Doctoral-level comment (but recommended for any collegiate writer)--Avoid anthropomorphisms (attributing human characteristics to nonhuman or inanimate objects). Consider that no paper can...

Words: 1952 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Fiction vs Reality

...Axia College of University of Phoenix As soon as a couple decades ago there was no such thing as media. Children played hop scotch for fun, chewing gum in class was the worst moral crime committed and sexual promiscuity was a folklore that was thought to originate with a few prostitutes that were as rare as Bigfoot. As the introduction of television introduced waves of crime, sex and betrayal into the homes of Americans the crime rate began to spike like never before. This spike in crime sparked a deep yearning to investigate the uncharted criminal mind. As media has expanded from radio to television and the Internet, crime has exploded all over the world and the need to control this wild horse has sparked worldwide interest in reality based television shows that depict the inner workings of a convicts mind and how the hero police officers, detectives, crime scene investigators and judges outwit, catch and then prosecute these lawbreakers. This exciting new fad has people watching these half hour shows and believing that they are entirely accurate. There are some television shows that use a great deal of fact in the creation of the show while other shows do not even come close. Since people have become enamored with courtroom based movies and television shows this has created a false sense of knowledge among common viewers that almost an entire nation believing that courtrooms consist of a defendant and a plaintiff (or a prosecuting attorney and a defense attorney) yelling...

Words: 1267 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Court Report Assignment

...CCJ12 Court Report: 1. Which court did you attend and what was the date of your attendance? I attended Sydney Downing Centre Local Court in New South Wales on Friday. 2. What kind of hearing did you attend? (e.g. sentence, summary trial, committal hearing, jury trial, mention, call-over etc) I attended a sentence hearing for the matter R vs Williamson. His Honour Judge D Frearson SC presided. The defendant had pleaded guilty prior to this hearing on 15th October 2013. 3. What were the charges against the defendant? Were these summary or indictable offences? How did you know this? Williamson entered a guilty plea to four major charges related to cheating and defrauding Health Services Union (HSU), creating false documents with the intention to deceive, and the recruiting of others to hinder a police investigation. Of these four charges, Williamson was charged with two counts of Director Cheat and Defraud which, which according to s.176A of the NSW Crimes Act 1900 No 40 carries a maximum penalty of ten years, one count of Officer Publish False Statement which carries a maximum of seven years according to s.192H of the Act, and two counts of Recruiting Another to Assist in Carrying out a Criminal Act s351A(1) of the Act. There were four forms of this count each carrying a maximum penalty of seven years per form. In Australian common law jurisdictions (New South Wales, South Australia and Victoria) an indictable offence is an offence that is tried on...

Words: 2691 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Jury Nullification

...Unfair and Damaging Practices in the Courtroom: Ethnicity Based Jury Nullification Josi Barth CJA/344 November 18, 2014 Bernice Baver Unfair Practices in the Courtroom: Ethnicity Based Jury Nullification On the television today, many of the most dramatic parts of the programming revolve around courtroom proceedings. An overzealous prosecutor asking tough and often damning questions to a pitiful guilty looking defendant is the main focus for the audience. The part that is often unseen and overlooked is ethnicity and the role it plays in the criminal justice system when it comes to courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. When it comes to these situations, there appears to be a certain amount of bias or indifference to minority citizens (The Criminology and Criminal Justice Collective of Northern Arizona University, 2009). Because of these biases, many minorities have little to no confidence in the court systems and subsequently are less likely to bring his or her case to court. For a further look into how ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings and judicial practices, one can analyze arguments for and against ethnicity based jury nullification and contemporary examples of jury nullification. Jury nullification is defined as the process that allows juries to acquit when the facts of the case suggest a conviction. This allows citizens to play a larger role in deciding guilt and who is punished (Mcnamara & Burns, 2009, Chapter 11). Ethnicity based...

Words: 1079 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Media vs the World

...The Media vs The World My face is glued to the television as I await the verdict that I had so anxiously wanted to hear for years. To no surprise, it was not a verdict we had all hoped for, partially due to the media. The Casey Anthony trial, is just one of the many that have fallen into the classification of a “media trial,” a loose term that describes the profound impact media coverage has on a person’s reputation by creating a pre-assumed perception of guilt or innocence, before, or after a case goes to court. This pre-assumed perception gives the general public, potential jury members, an impartial view on a court case, overall, influencing the system of American justice. This injustice, especially in high profile cases, happens when jury members, sometimes court officials, simply want to gain their “five seconds of fame.” Now an additional problem lies within the simple, yet complex, fight between the right of free press and the right to an impartial jury. Let’s face it, there is no such concept as an impartial jury, simply due to the media attention that trials receive these days. Within this main problem, lies many problems that interfere with the American idea of justice. Are we craving, and striving to find entertainment, or justice? One problem that stems from media that could possibly add to jury bias and court outcomes, it is what lawyers refer to as the “CSI Effect.” Named after the hit television show, this phenomenon describes the distorted view crime investigation...

Words: 1829 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Attorney vs Judge

...Attorney vs. Judge Lisa Lupola CJS/211 July 13, 2015 Instructor Leesa McNeil Social Media “With the rampant expansion of social media and online technologies over the past decade, it is no surprise that Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and blogs have made their way into the courtroom, pervaded the jury box, and even pierced the veil of judges’ chambers”, Assoc. of Bar of St. of N.Y. Eth. Op. 2012-2, *4-7 (2012). Unfortunately, for a 52-year-old lawyer Joyce Nanine McCool, is disbarred after using Twitter and an online petition on Facebook, encouraging citizens to contact the judges involved in an alleged child abuse custody case. Did this lawyer act in the best interest the of children in this alleged sex-abuse and divorce case or was this was an act of unethical and unprofessional misconduct attempting to influence the judges involved in this case? Why would this attorney risk being disbarred for this cause? Outside the Box Ms. McCool, Esq. represented a client and friend in a bitter divorce case in which the client’s two small daughters accused their father of sexual abuse. The ethical dilemma constitutes ex parte communication, which is prohibited. The "12 Cfr 263.9 -Ex Parte Communications"(1994) website defines, “Ex parte communication as any material oral or written communication relevant to the merits of an adjudicatory proceeding that was neither on the record nor on reasonable prior notice to all parties that takes place between:”...

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Criminology

...With the rapid development of technology into everyday life, nearly every aspect of a courtroom proceeding, other than electronic filing, involves using paper. In most jurisdictions, attorneys must deliver courtesy copies of any filing to chambers, print and carry numerous copies of often voluminous binders of exhibits to hearings, as well as bring paper copies of any orders to be signed to court. However, in the future, paper will be replaced by technology which will reduce time and energy. The electronic readers and the tablet computers will be the mainstream in the courtroom. This will create applications for separate files. Example: tables, podiums and stands will have electronic readers, allowing documents to be viewed by each party. While media in the courtroom can affect the verdict, there is also an affect on the jurors, attorneys, judges, victims, and witnesses. There is a sound basis for being concerned about the potential impact of cameras in the courtroom on judges. (Lepofsky, 1994). Cameras in the courtroom are significant added burden on the judge. The judge will have to police the cameras, to ensure compliance with all rules, and try to prevent any prejudicial camera-induced impact (Lepofsky, 1994). However, the courtroom of the future is likely to look very different, there will be the need for a more supporting data networks to empower every site of a building. Such as using video conferencing with lawyers and judges...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Courtoom Participation

...Courtroom Participation Paper Keva Russell CJA/224 01/09/12 Mr. Mitchell In this paper, there will be discussion about the various courtroom participants and also discuss each role. There also will be a discussion of the duties and responsibilities of the major participants, how they are selected to become participants and their importance in the court proceedings. There are several different courtroom participants, such as, the judges, the law clerks (division clerks), prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, victims, defendants and bailiffs. There could possibly be additional courtroom participants, like, the media, the courtroom reporters, interpreters and speculators. The judge is a public officer who hears and decides cases in a court of law. The law clerks are the people who help with getting information for the judge, helping with entering verbiage into the system and looking up cases that have similar circumstances as the case that is presented. The prosecutor prosecutes the case. They are driven to put the alleged suspect, criminal or defendant behind bars or obtain a record from committing a crime. Whereas the defense attorneys help the defendants with their cases to get them from going to jail or doing the maximum time for the crime committed. Witnesses are the people that are called to court to describe a crime that they saw with their own eyes. Victims are the people that the crime was committed on. They also can testify against the defendant...

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Courtroom Bribery

...Introduction - The study of bribery and corruption in the courtroom is paramount to protecting the rights of every person seeking justice. The fact that a judge or District Attorney is 99% honest simply will not suffice. Even the 1% must be treated fairly and equally under the laws of our country. Just like Jesus would leave the ninety-nine to go after the one, we must protect everyone equally under the laws established. Meditate on the words of Edmund Burke “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” The study and revelation of courtroom corruption is significant because I have personally observed bribery in the hallways of courtrooms in North Carolina. A wise man once told me that the courtroom is not black or white, but green because the person with the most money is routinely dispensed the best outcome. Another personal reason that this topic is personally significant is because I now reside in the state of Mississippi where the 2004 Corporate Crime Reporter asserted that our state was the most crooked state in America. (Mokhibar, 2004) I. The problem is that too many times the issues in the courtroom are not really about the truth. A. Case study on the Duke Lacrosse case involving Durham County District Attorney, Mike Nifong. (Yaeger, 2007) B. Factors involved in the Duke Lacrosse case, and the lives that were destroyed as a result of courtroom corruption. 1. The politics...

Words: 622 - Pages: 3