Free Essay

Mediation

In:

Submitted By destg
Words 3889
Pages 16
Mediation and Ethics Consultation:

Destiny Gove

Mediation and Ethics Consultation:

“The orchestration of moral collaboration [required in ethics consultation] will be complex. Parties will share morally problematic situations but may have different senses of what is relevant and understandably different personal stakes. The ethicist has special responsibility to enliven a process in which these common moral concerns stay in focus while differences are recognized and, ideally, mediated.”
—Margaret Walker, 1993, p. 39.

Abstract

Mediation has received considerable attention in the bioethics literature on ethics consultation. The recent consensus report Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation issued by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities acknowledges positive benefits of mediation training. In times when moral consensus in the most intractable of cases is not possible, mediation or other conflict resolution strategies might help the parties reach a resolution. Moreover, mediation training can help ethics consultants achieve mastery of the interpersonal elements of ethics consultation. However, to argue that mediation can be appropriately adapted as an ethics consultation modality is a more controversial matter. This paper surveys the bioethics literature regarding the role of mediation as a consultation modality and presents criticisms levied against bioethics mediation. The strongest criticisms concern the supposed neutral or impartial stance mediators must take to the conflicts in which they intervene. Such impartiality is either not appropriate for ethics consultation or it is impossible to achieve, opponents of bioethics mediation argue. In defense of the role of mediation in ethics consultation, I argue that these two strong criticisms can be overcome by suggesting a new understanding of impartiality for ethics consultation that comports with the approach posited in Core Competencies. Thus, if impartiality only extends to the parties and their values, not to the norms used to reach the outcome, mediation as a stand-alone consultation modality represents a viable option.

Mediation and Ethics Facilitation

Mediation has received considerable attention in the bioethics literature on ethics consultation. The recent consensus report Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation (hereafter Core Competencies) issued by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) acknowledges positive benefits of mediation training. Consensus in intractable cases may not be possible. In this event, Core Competencies (1998) suggests “mediation or other conflict resolution techniques…can often help involved parties come to a mutually agreeable solution” (p. 8). In addition, “formal training in specific techniques such as mediation…is one way to obtain advanced interpersonal and process skills” (ASBH, 1998, p. 16). Mediation refers both to a process and a set of conflict resolution skills. The mediation process traditionally features mediator impartiality or neutrality, confidentiality of the proceedings, an opportunity for parties to voice their concerns without interruption, and mediator-guided problem-solving, option generation, and option assessment (Hoffmann, 1994a). The goal is a feasible, joint agreement balancing the concerns that originally brought the parties to mediation. Ethics facilitation, the approach endorsed in Core Competencies, involves two stages. The first involves fact gathering and sharing from chart reviews and interviews, followed by consultant use of bioethics knowledge and concepts to generate a range of ethical options for resolving the conflict or uncertainty. The second stage allows participants to voice their concerns about the options. Ethics consultants then use interpersonal facilitation skills to clarify participants’ values and views regarding the options and builds consensus for the selection of one option. The stages of mediation follow a sequence similar to ethics facilitation. Before identifying and analyzing the conflict or uncertainty that has brought the parties to mediation, mediators explain the mediation process and its ground rules. Then, mediators listen attentively to each parties’ perception of the conflict or uncertainty and use communication techniques to acknowledge emotions often underlying interpersonal conflicts. Such a stage allows the building of rapport and empathy, first between the mediators and the parties, then, hopefully, between the parties themselves.

Mediation as an Ethics Consultation Modality: A Survey of the Bioethics Literature

The bioethics literature makes several references to the role that mediators, the mediation process, or mediation skills play in resolving bioethical problems.[1] Despite its prevalence in the ethics consultation literature, few sources argue that mediation can serve as a stand-alone consultation modality. Nancy Dubler and Leonard Marcus (1994) outline such a model in their book Mediating Bioethical Disputes: A Practical Guide. Like traditional configurations of the mediation process, Dubler and Marcus argue that a bioethics mediator must be impartial. The goal behind bioethics mediation is to help transform parties’ initial positional stances to a conflict or uncertainty into shared opportunities for dialogue and resolution. Dubler and Marcus argue that impartiality—where the mediator does not favor any particular parties’ position—facilitates this transformation. The goal of mediation should be a consensus solution, generated in light of common interests and in comportment with established and recognized ethical and legal standards. Of the four mediation stages, the second focuses on narrative. Mediation participants relate their perspective of the situation in their own words and without interruption. The mediators acknowledge any emotive content in such narratives and use communication techniques like active listening or mirroring to represent the substance of the narrative to other participants. The goal is to ensure that all parties have an adequate understanding of the situation, that all parties have a comprehensive account of “the facts” as each of them understands them, and that the mediator has made the parties comfortable expressing their views and concerns. An interesting literature has emerged focusing on narrative in moral thinking. Stories provide robust descriptions of our moral experiences, blending emotion, rationality, perception, and judgment into one corpus. One article in particular, Margaret Walker’s (1993) “Keeping Moral Space Open: New Images of Ethics Consulting,” relates narrative in ethics consultation to mediation. Unlike Dubler and Marcus, Walker does not posit a model of ethics consultation based on mediation. Rather, she argues that morality is best described as the exchange and mutual understanding of often divergent moral narratives. Morality thus becomes less concerned with theories and their application to specific cases and more with establishing “a medium of progressive acknowledgement and adjustment among people in (or in search of) a common and habitable moral world” (Walker, 1993, p. 35). The ethics consultant acts as an architect of the moral space where such a search can take place and a mediator of the divergent moral narratives within such space.

Criticisms of Bioethics Mediation

Bioethics mediation supporters, like Yvonne Craig (1996), tout that mediation enhances patient autonomy. The reason concerns the impartial stance mediators take to disputes. Impartiality, Craig argues, empowers participants and encourages moral ownership of the problem. The claim of impartiality, however, has received significant criticism. Opponents argue that bioethics mediation is an inappropriate method for resolving particular clinical problems because the neutral or impartial role of the mediator is either not appropriate for ethics consultation or impossible to achieve. The Façade of Mediator Neutrality and Impartiality. Giles Scofield argues that ethics consultation should not be considered a profession, and thus efforts at professionalization should not be attempted. His rationale for this claim concerns an inability of ethicists to articulate, teach, test, and certify what amounts to ethical expertise. In addition, Scofield believes that ethics consultation, because it assumes that its practitioners somehow have the market on moral expertise, represents the antithesis to the democratic understanding of morality—that all persons are moral equals. Scofield cites Walker as a scholar who seems to share his criticism regarding the inappropriateness of ethical expertise. Instead of suggesting that ethicists are experts or ethical engineers who master code-like theories and use this knowledge to solve moral problems for their owners, Walker proposes the idea that ethics consultants should be regarded as architects or mediators. Their role is not to solve moral difficulties for the parties experiencing them, but rather to create moral space where conversations can occur. Such a role should uphold and operationalize a commitment to moral pluralism—that all persons are moral equals. Moreover, it would emphasize the role of narrative dialogue and conversation above any expertise in moral theory the ethicist brings to the consultation. Nevertheless, Scofield criticizes Walker’s mediator role. He argues that the consultant’s role as a mediator seems objective and impartial, but it is not. The mere involvement of the consultant violates any notion of objective neutrality: “It is impossible to mediate a discussion without affecting, even influencing, it. …[W]e should not delude ourselves into thinking that they [ethicists] do not, cannot or will not influence how others discuss and deliberate ethical dilemmas” (Scofield, 1993, p. 20). In essence, Scofield objects to the implicit moral superiority inherent in casting ethics consultants as architects or mediators. Both still presuppose some sort of ethical or conversational expertise, he argues, which “is hardly a benign claim. If consent is the essence of democracy, and conversation is the essence of consent, then the ethics consultant’s claim is that some individuals know better than others what needs to be said and how conversations ought to proceed” (Scofield 1993, 20). The Paradox of Neutrality or Impartiality. Author Diane Hoffmann takes Scofield’s criticism one step further and suggests that the supposed neutrality or impartiality of the mediator poses a paradox for its use in ethics consultation. Not only is impartiality impossible to achieve, it is not appropriate for ethics consultation. Hoffmann argues directly against authors who suggest mediation enhances patient autonomy. If mediation enhances autonomy, Hoffmann posits, then the participants should be the primary decision-makers. The mediator should both refrain from inputting values into the debate and not force participants to use outside norms to reach agreement. Since mediators cannot help but shape the discussion with their own values, and bioethics mediation, in particular, must use relevant norms from ethics, policy, and the law (Scofield, 1993; Dubler & Marcus, 1994; Hoffmann, 1994b; Waldman, 1997a; Waldman, 1997b), then the argument that mediation enhances autonomy does not hold. Traditional mediation, Hoffmann argues, attempts to place the decision-making onus on the participants by eschewing reliance on outside norms and by ensuring the neutrality of the mediator. The principles and rules of justice governing legal and civil interaction between persons are suspended in mediation and the parties are free to create their own understandings of such principles and rules. Neither are appropriate for ethics consultation, however. Core Competencies suggests that a pure facilitation (or a pure mediation) approach might yield a consensus that falls outside of culturally enshrined and socially acknowledged ethical and legal limits. Such criticisms seem to doom mediation from playing any appropriate role in ethics consultation.

The Use of Norms in Bioethics Mediation: A New Understanding of Impartiality

Three Types of Norm-Based Mediation. On the basis of her critique of using mediation to resolve certain ethical conflicts, Hoffmann asks about the appropriate place of norms in mediation. Mediation, traditionally structured and practiced, presupposes that participants will generate the norms that will constrain the options and solutions to resolve a case. Ellen Waldman (1997a; 1997b) terms such traditional mediation norm-generation. She contrasts norm-generation with two other norm-based approaches to mediation: norm-education and norm-advocation. These three forms of norm-based mediation help to distinguish several subtypes of impartiality, one of which comports with the ethics facilitation approach promulgated in Core Competencies. Waldman argues that norm-generation has its place in mediation and in bioethics. Some bioethical conflicts or uncertainties involve cases where no norm yet exists to guide resolution. Waldman points to futility disputes as an example. In contrast, norm-education involves educating the parties regarding the legal and ethical norms at stake, but allows the parties to judge how to apply or interpret such norms. Waldman argues that rarely is norm-education useful for mediating bioethical disputes. It would be inappropriate to educate the parties regarding a consensus norm in bioethics, but then tell them either to feel free to interpret it how they want or to disregard it altogether. Finally, norm-advocation involves educating the parties regarding the relevant legal, social, and ethical norms, but the mediator urges the inclusion of particular norms in the resolution. Norm-advocation seems to mirror the stance in Core Competencies that consensus cannot be reached if it does not fall within a socially accepted range of ethical options. Moreover, norm-advocation seems to involve constraining the “substance” of agreements to ensure not only the fairness of the outcome (Hoffmann’s worry) but also accomplishes it in such a way that does not violate the autonomy of the participants or the democracy of the process (Scofield’s worry). Thus, while norm-advocation might be appropriate for bioethics mediation, norm-education is certainly not, and norm-generation, the traditional structuring of mediation, has limited utility. The Use of Norms in Bioethics Mediation and a Parallel in Ethics Consultation. Hoffmann argues that end-of-life disputes in particular ought not be resolved by traditional applications of mediation. First, mediation presupposes that all parties are competent to negotiate. In end-of-life disputes, often the party whose interests are the subject of the mediation is incapacitated or incompetent and cannot participate. Thus, Hoffmann worries that no one in mediation will be properly able to represent the values of the patient and negotiate in good faith on his or her behalf. Mediation may not be able to ensure the adequate protection of the patient’s rights, she argues.[2] Hoffmann’s worry regarding the use of norms in mediation has a correlate in ethics consultation. The bioethics literature has debated several questions related to the appropriate use of norms in ethics consultation. Should ethics consultants be patient advocates and ensure the protection of patients? Should ethics consultants make recommendations or merely provide moral advice? If ethics consultants make recommendations, should they stem from well articulated and supported personal positions or should they represent consensus opinions from the bioethics literature? Core Competencies clearly argues that ethics consultants should not advocate for any one party. Such a role clearly violates the consultant’s facilitative role. Rather, ethics consultants should strive to ensure the equal protection of all parties’ rights and interests by balancing power, ensuring effective communication, and facilitating divergent moral views. That ethics consultants should not advocate for any party suggests ethics facilitation requires a type of impartiality towards the parties and their values. Impartiality, in this sense, operationalizes an explicit respect for moral pluralism by not privileging any one set of values. Construing impartiality as limited to the parties and their values and preferences provides an answer to the second question above. According to Core Competencies, ethics consultants can and should provide recommendations, but in two very different senses. The result of the first stage of ethics facilitation should yield several ethically justifiable options. These are, in effect, the options that ethics consultants could recommend. However, ethics consultants do not have to recommend that specific options be implemented. The only admonition Core Competencies provides is that ethics consultants should make it known when they are recommending particular options, especially when such recommendations incorporate the consultants’ personal moral views. Disclosure will lessen the tendency such recommendations have to impose the consultant’s values on the parties and so usurp their decision-making authority and responsibility. Core Competencies does not use the language of impartiality or neutrality to describe the role of norms in ethics facilitation. Nevertheless, its warning that ethics consultants be conscious of the influence of their personal moral views on the consultation outcome, coupled with its focus on participant decision-making ownership, suggests that ethics facilitation implicitly utilizes norm-advocation. If consultants do indeed recommend particular options, already determined to be ethically sound, they are advocating that particular norms determine the consultation outcome. The only proviso is that how such norms are advocated be made explicitly clear—consensus norms from the bioethics literature or personal moral views. Imposing one’s own values seems in direct violation of the facilitative role Core Competencies outlines. However, norm-advocation does not impose one’s personal values but rather socially and ethically enshrined values. A clear example concerns situations where the options generated are not ones the consultant would have generated or chosen, but they accord with acknowledged ethical and legal standards. The challenge for consultants, then, becomes how to avoid imposing their values or seeming to do so by advocating for particular norms to decide the consultation. Strict impartiality is inappropriate for ethics consultation, but how does norm-advocation uphold the sort of impartiality to the parties and their values required by a commitment to moral pluralism? An answer to this question can be found by turning to one of the first publications to articulate the use of bioethics mediation, Dubler and Marcus’ Mediating Bioethics Disputes. These authors unknowingly posit norm-advocation as the goal of bioethics mediation. Dubler and Marcus (1994) argue that the goal of bioethics mediation is a “principled solution”—a solution generated through application of the mediation process that both respects the interests of the participants but also accords with consensus ethical and legal standards (p. 34). A principled solution is Dubler and Marcus’ answer to the problem of pure facilitation discussed in Core Competencies. In order to protect against facilitated or mediated agreements falling outside of socially determined legal and ethical boundaries, agreements using bioethics mediation must not represent applications of pure norm-generating mediation. Ethical and legal consensus, where they exist, should guide the resolution in such a way that the ethical and legal norms match the expressed and articulated values of the parties. Where such norms do not exist, perhaps applications of norm-generation bioethics mediation may be appropriate, as Waldman suggests.

Conclusion: Overcoming the Problem of Impartiality Both Scofield and Hoffman argue that mediator impartiality is a façade. The use of norm-advocation, which seems most appropriate for bioethics mediation, violates the strict impartiality of the mediator. Like Scofield claims, in order to ensure the integrity of the outcome, the mediator must advocate that certain values or norms take precedence in the consultation. Thus, while the mediator might appear impartial, advocating that certain values should help decide the matter not only usurps the democratic ideals behind traditionally structured norm-generating mediation but also makes the mediator’s supposed impartiality disingenuous. I argue that we need to reconstrue impartiality. Scofield and Hoffman seem to contend that a mediator must be impartial or neutral to both the parties and the values or norms used to resolve the dispute. Ethics facilitation requires that consultants be impartial to the former, but not the latter. Thus, impartiality towards the parties—not favoring or advocating for one particular party—supplies an appropriate context for a form of impartiality in ethics consultation. Ethics facilitation clearly mandates that ethics consultants not impose their own values on the participants. In essence, a commitment to moral pluralism requires that the ethics consultants be impartial towards the participants, their values and preferences, and even the options generated, so long as they comport with established ethical and legal norms. However, ethics facilitation requires partiality towards the outcome—the decisions reached must accord with (or at least not violate) socially, ethically, and legally recognized standards. Thus, the ethics consultants cannot be impartial to the outcome or to the norms used to reach that outcome. These distinctions between three subtypes of impartiality—towards participants, towards outcome, and towards norms—indicate that Hoffmann and Scofield have conflated the notion of impartiality in their analyses. Although the paradox of impartiality might apply to traditionally structured mediation, the paradox lacks applicability to norm-advocation bioethics mediation and the use of mediation processes and skills in ethics consultation. Ethics facilitation requires that no one person’s moral values or interests be accorded privileged status. The attempt to reach consensus in ethics facilitation represents a blending designed to uphold impartiality towards the parties and their values but also comportment with recognized ethical, legal, and clinical standards. Mediation modalities that incorporate norm-advocation, but eschew impartiality towards outcome and norms, comport with ethics facilitation and thus could serve as stand-alone ethics consultation processes.

References

|American Hospital Association and CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution. (1995). Managing Conflict in Health Care Organizations. New York: |
|CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution. |
|American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). (1998). Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation. Glenview, IL: ASBH. |
|Baylis, F.E. (1994). A profile of the health care ethics consultant. In F.E. Baylis (Ed.), The Health Care Ethics Consultant (pp. 25-44). |
|Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc. |
|Cassarett, D.J., Daskal, F., & Lantos, J. (1998). Experts in ethics? The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Center Report 28(6): |
|6-11. |
|Craig, Y. 1996. Patient decision-making: Medical ethics and mediation. Journal of Medical Ethics 22: 164-167. |
|Dubler, N.N. & Marcus, L.J. (1994). Mediating Bioethical Disputes: A Practical Guide. New York: United Hospital Fund. |
|Dubler, N.N. (1998). Mediation and managed care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 46: 359-364. |
|Frader, J.E. (1992). Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation. Theoretical Medicine 13(1): 31-44. |
|Gibson, J.M. (1994). Mediation for ethics committees: A promising process. Generations 18(4): 58-60. |
|Gibson, K. (1999). Mediation in the medical field: Is neutral intervention possible? Hastings Center Report 29(5): 6-13. |
|Glidewell, B.L. (1996). Role of the ombudsman. Dimensions in Critical Care Nursing 15(3): 157. |
|Hoffmann, D. (1994a). Case consultation: Paying attention to process. HEC Forum 6(2): 85-92. |
|Hoffmann, D. (1994b). Mediating life and death decisions. Arizona Law Review 36: 821-877. |
| |
|Lynch, A. (1994). “…Has knowledge of [interpersonal] facilitation techniques and theory; has the ability to facilitate [interpersonally]…”: |
|Fact or fiction. In F.E. Baylis (Ed.), The Health Care Ethics Consultant (pp. 45-62). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc. |
|Reynolds, D.F. (1994). Consultectonics: Ethics committee case consultation as mediation. Bioethics Forum 10(4): 54-60. |
|Rubin, S. & Zoloth-Dorfman, L. (1994). First-person plural: Community and method in ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics 5(1): |
|49-54. |
|Scofield, G. (1993). Here come the ethicists! Trends in Health Care, Law & Ethics 8(4): 19-22. |
|Society for Health and Human Values (SHHV) & Society for Bioethics Consultation (SBC) Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. |
|(1997). Discussion draft of the SHHV-SBC task force on standards for bioethics consultation: 1-23. |
|Spielman, B.J. (n.d.). A mediation model of clinical medical ethics. Unpublished manuscript. |
|Wagoner, R.J. (1992). Introducing mediation to hospital ethics. California Lawyer 12: 69-72. |
|Waldman, E.A. (1997a). Identifying the role of social norms in mediation: A multiple model approach. Hastings Law Journal 48(4): 703-769. |
|Waldman, E.A. (1997b). Using norm-based mediation in ethics consultation. Presentation at the Joint Meeting of the American Association of |
|Bioethics, Society for Bioethics Consultation, Society for Health and Human Values, November 5-9, 1997, Baltimore, MD. |
|Walker, M.U. (1993). Keeping moral space open: New images of ethics consulting. Hastings Center Report 23(2): 33-40. |

----------------------- [1]The bibliography contains a comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of sources from the bioethics literature that reference mediation. [2]Hoffmann’s worry about the lack of patient protection prompts an example of how norm-advocation can ameliorate her concern. Ethics consultants can educate the parties to an end-of-life dispute (one in which the patient is not a participant) regarding the legally and ethically appropriate standards for surrogate decision-making and ensure that the decisions that emerge accord with those standards.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Mediation

...To: Maria From: Sarah Farrell Date: March 1st 2015 Dear Maria, I did some research regarding what we had discussed earlier and found two cases, that direct me on whether or not you should be adding in the arbitration clause. The first case was CB Richard Ellis, INC. v. American Envtl. Waste Mgmt. 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20064 (E.D.N.Y Dec. 4, 1998), the New York courts attitudes to arbitration and mediation clauses where the plaintiff contracted with the defendants company for waste removal services under a written contract with general mediation clause governing “any dispute”, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this agreement or the work when the plaintiff sued for fraud, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract for overbilling and paying kickbacks, the defendant moved to stay the proceeding and compel mediation. The court found the Federal Arbitration Act applied to mediation under the parties’ contract as a process that would “settle” the controversy. The mediation clause was broadly worded, had no exclusions, and covered all disputes relating to the contract. It had a strong presumption favoring in arbitration and governed disputes that only touched the matters of the agreement. In the second case, Dean Witter Reynolds v. Byrd, 470 U.S. 213, 218, 84 L. Ed. 2d 158, 105 S. Ct. 1238 (1985). In 1981, respondent invested $160,000 in securities through petitioner broker-dealer. The parties had a written agreement to arbitrate any disputes that...

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mediation

...A DEFENDANT’S MEDIATION STATEMENT Name: Institution: Date: Opening Statement for the Defendant (Mediation). 1. Parties attending the Mediation Case a. The plaintiff, Carmen L. b. The defendant, Juanita Solis. c. Ms close Jones, a key witness d. Mr. Dennis Watson, a key witness 2. Brief Summary of Facts The plaintiff and the defendant are sisters. The plaintiff was drinking whiskey and cola as she talked to the defendant. She spilled whiskey and slipped when she got up. As a result of the fall, Carmen suffered a severe back injury. The plaintiff commenced this mediation case suing the restaurant of negligence. The siblings of the defendant have also raised alarming claims against the defendant. They claim that being given the job by their mom was a misdeed and that the defendant is ripping the family apart. The sources of these happenings are strongly attributed to the lat will left by the parents of the parties. The plaintiff expected to be named as the manager of the restaurant because she has worked in the business for around eight years. Following, the pass over, the plaintiff resolved to heavy drinking of alcohol the circumstance leading to the accident. 3. Claim and defense to counter the claim The plaintiffs claim lies on the basis that the restaurant was negligent. However, the defendant disputes these claims as the circumstances underlying the accident solely lie on the responsibility of defendant as confirmed by the summary of facts...

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Advocacy and Mediation

...Advocacy and Mediation website review BSHS 422 University of Phoenix In this paper three websites pertaining to mediation and advocacy for different types of people will be reviewed. All of these websites are great vehicles for researching advocacy and mediation. These websites offer a plethora of information regarding advocacy and mediation. The National Organization of Human Services website, defines the field of Human Services as - "broadly defined, uniquely approaching the objective of meeting human needs through an interdisciplinary knowledge base, focusing on prevention as well as remediation of problems, and maintaining a commitment to improving the overall quality of life of service populations. The Human Services profession is one which promotes improved service delivery systems by addressing not only the quality of direct services, but also by seeking to improve accessibility, accountability, and coordination among professionals and agencies in service delivery” (The National Organization for human service). In America, the National organization of Human Services is considered to be the nation's principal agency for health protection and provision of essential human services to all Americans especially those who are considered to be in the lower level of society. Human Services professionals working for and with the varied agencies mediate and advocate to resolve conflict and to educate about its varied causes and concerns. Advocates speak for and...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mediation in Family

...Introduction Conflict is a problematic event, and, such as, it needs to be managed (Sara, 2011). To a certain extent, it is correct because it endangers existing relationship and undermines the constructive initiative between at least two parties in the group process. On the other side, some researchers may insist the appearance of conflict is inevitable, in somehow conflict may emerge from everyday in our life. Mediation The word mediation is now in common usage, but still liable to be ambiguous with similar words such as “conciliation” and “reconciliation”. Mediation has become increasingly necessary to agree a universal definition. According to The Council of the European Union, it defines mediation as: “a structured process…whereby two or more parties to a dispute attempt by themselves, on a voluntary basis, to reach an agreement on the settlement of their dispute with the assistance of a mediator.” A mediator is defined as: “any third person who is asked to conduct mediation in an effective, impartial and competent way…” Mediators help the parties to explore more settlement and to reach mutual agreement. Participants are encouraged to reach the agreement autonomously and mutually decision, without threats and pressure from each parties and without direction from the mediator. Counselor VS Mediator Although family mediators and counselors undoubtedly similar with some common areas of knowledge and skills, it is important to state that the role of mediator differs...

Words: 1502 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Mediation and Arbitration

...essential to resolve disputes through mediation and arbitration to make a mutual decision between parties who are unable to resolve issues by themselves as well as avoid high cost legal fees. Mediation and arbitration may not work all the time but with the right mediator and arbitrator, at least eighty percent of the time they are able to work out an agreement that is acceptable to both parties (Cahn & Abigail, 2007, pg. 196). Once the case is acceptable, legal action may not be needed and the parties can move forward to an agreement. Cahn & Abigail (2007) defined the role of arbitration as a neutral third party considering both sides of a dispute and makes a decision, which is more binding than that of a judge in the legal system if both parties have agreed in advance to abide by the decision (no appeal)” (pg. 195). Depending on the situation and conflict, it can be beneficial going through arbitration so all parties will be able to express their side without having a judge or jurors make a final ruling. Cahn & Abigail (2007) defined the role of mediation as a neutral third party that facilitates communication between the conflicting parties so that they may work out their own mutually acceptable agreement” (pg. 195). Conflicts can be difficult to resolve because all parties feel that their way is the right way and no other way is right. This can get out of line especially when the conflict needs to be resolved. The function of mediation and arbitration is to resolve conflicts...

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Adr & Mediation

...formal and informal means of resolving disputes in an economical way. Two of the most commonly used ADRs are arbitration and mediation. All disputes within the learning team will use the mediation process for resolution. The learning team charter that was set up in the first class must be followed as all team members discussed. The conflicts between the team members that effect the efficiency and productivity of the learning team will be subject to the ADR process. If a disagreement, dispute, or claim arises the team members should use their best efforts to settle the dispute. Any conflict that cannot be solved by the involved members will enable the ADR process after 24 hours. If a dispute arises between team members, they must participate in a mediation process with a neutral person appointed by the other remaining team members. If the dispute involves all of the learning team, a facilitator will be involved to appoint the mediator. The mediator will have confidential discussion with each involved member and will try to reach voluntary agreement. Mediation involves no formal procedures and the mediator does not have the power to render a binding decision or force parties to agree. In the event the dispute is not settled during mediation, an arbitration clause will follow. If the dispute cannot be settled within 36 hours after mediation has been appointed, the dispute will be referred and resolved through arbitration. The...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mediation and Advocy

...Mediation and Advocacy Literature Review An internet search for websites that link mediation and advocacy to human services was done and multiple sites populated on the topic of mediation and advocacy. However, I decided to research three of the websites listed on the University of Phoenix Material; National ADR Organizations. The three sites I reviewed are: • Mediators: www.mediators.org • Arizona Mediation Institute: http://www.arizonamediation.com/process.php • CDR Associates: http://www.mediate.org/ Following is a summary of what I reviewed in each website and the resources linking mediation and advocacy to human services. • Mediators: This site did not provide an about us or mission statement. It is not a website that provides a service. It provides information and various articles about different categories like: child custody, child support, mediators, family law and divorce. I found the information on this site very helpful for individuals dealing with divorce. My son is going through a divorce and I was able to get some helpful information regarding child custody. The different articles provided addressed various topics relating to human services and the process to mediation. • Arizona Mediation Institute: The Arizona Mediation Institute site offers a service and an about us tab that stated they offer “an unparalleled mediation experience. By creating a mediation environment that is both approachable and professional, Arizona Mediation Institute provides...

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Conflict and Mediation

...Conflict and Mediation OL 7001-8 Assignment 6 Karen Platt Dr. Benton September 6, 2015 Mediation Workplace-based stress may be triggered by interpersonal differences, which can produce damaged relationships, loss of productivity, decreased job satisfaction, and lowered morale (Cahn & Abigail, 2014; McKenzie, 2015). Stress is the emotional or intellectual response by someone to a perceived threat in his or her workplace or personal life (Cahn & Abigail, 2014; McKenzie, 2015). In many cases stress can result in workplace conflict. Not all work-place conflict can be resolved without third-party intervention. A third-party is brought in to facilitate a negotiation process when individuals cannot negotiate or agree on an issue effectively. Mediation is an intervention in a standard negotiation conflict acceptable by all involved parties (Cahn & Abigail, 2014). The unbiased third-party has limited or no authoritative decision-making power, is neutral, and perceived as being fair (McKenzie, 2015). Mediation has been found to produce better organizational outcomes than other interventions. This paper provides a closer look at mediation, mediators, and the process used during conflict resolutions. In addition, the author has provided an example of a practical application of a mediation plan used by mediators. Mediator’s Roles and Responsibilities Independent mediators are neutral, impartial, and normally have no prior relationships with the...

Words: 1791 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Develop Mediation Guidelines

...Develop Mediation Guidelines Mediation is suitable for most workplace disputes. The following guidelines outline the way this organisation conducts workplace dispute mediations. Mediation is an informal and flexible process in which a neutral third party, the mediator, seeks to facilitate discussions between the parties with a view to assisting the parties to resolve the dispute, or at least, to clarify the issues in dispute. The Mediator The mediator is independent and impartial and has no vested interest in the outcome of the settlement of the dispute. If the mediator becomes aware at any stage of any circumstance that might reasonably be considered to affect adversely his or her capacity to act independently or impartially, the mediator must inform the parties immediately. The mediator must in such circumstances terminate the proceedings, unless the parties agree otherwise. The mediator will not later act for any party in, or relating to, any conciliation, arbitral or court proceedings in respect of the dispute. Date, Time and Place of Mediation/Identification of Issues The mediation shall take place as soon as practicable after any further documentation agreed to be provided has been forwarded to the mediator. The mediation shall be fixed for a date, time and place agreeable to the parties and the mediator. In the event that the parties cannot agree on a place for holding the mediation the mediator shall nominate the place. The parties agree to be bound by the...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Managing Mediation Process

...Managing a Mediation Process offers an overview of the process of mediating interstate and intrastate conflicts. Each of its six chapters covers a different step in the process, identifying what needs to be done at that step and how best to accomplish it: ● ● ● ● ● ● SMITH AND SMOCK MANAGING A MEDIATION PROCESS Assess the Conflict Ensure Mediator Readiness Ensure Conflict Ripeness Conduct Track-I Mediation Encourage Track-II Dialogue Construct a Peace Agreement Managing a Mediation Process is the first of several handbooks in the Peacemaker’s Toolkit series and deals largely with Track-I efforts. Each handbook in the series addresses a particular facet of the work of mediating violent conflicts, including such topics as negotiating with terrorists, managing public information, constitution making, assessing and enhancing ripeness, and Track-II peacemaking, among others. MANAGING A MEDIATION PROCESS Consolidating practical wisdom distilled from the hard-won experience of seasoned mediators into an easily digestible format, this handbook is designed to help mediators identify areas where they may need more research or preparation, as well as options and strategies relevant to the particular case on which they are working. Examples from past mediation efforts are provided. CT ST RU CE T CONA PEA MEN E AGRE Managing a MEDIATION PROCESS AGE OURC II E ENCTRA GU O DIAL UC T ONDAC I ON C R T DIATI ME Amy L. Smith and...

Words: 17566 - Pages: 71

Premium Essay

Mediation and Advocacy Review

...Mediation or Conflict Resolution Processes The interviewee position as Center Coordinator/Supervisor requires her to play the role of the internal and external mediator. She plays mediator when staff members have issues that arise between them. Mediation is used with the interviewee because it allows the individuals involved to give their perspectives on the matter. During mediation the interviewee demonstrates fairness, respect, equal attention and confidentiality. This helps when a neutral party to the matter, can assist the individual in making a decision that is satisfying for all parties as a resolution to the matter at hand. Some of the issues that the interviewee serve as mediator for are child abuse or neglect, low income families that are not able to meet the needs of their children and families, language barriers, challenging behaviors of the students and encouragement of parental involvement. Each case is handled with the appropriate actions warranted for each issue respectfully, and cautiously not to overlook anything and to ensure immediate attention. The interviewee has been an advocate for over 40 years. Advocacy is important to her because children need someone to be their voice and truly loves children. Also she feels strongly about being the voice of individuals who do not understand the process of acquiring resources for needed services. The interviewee goals are to provide a smooth transition for the children from Head Start to Elementary School and...

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mediation & Advocacy Lit Review

...Mediation and Advocacy Literature Review Alex Vasquez BSHS 442 September 21, 2011 Instructor- Barker The field of human services combines counseling, social work and psychology in one. Meditation is a step by step process in which agreements and disagreements are explored with individuals who have a conflict and try to reach an understanding of one another. A mediator is not there to create a solution but rather promote it and keep their parties engaged in problem solving. An advocate also works with clients but they side with the better half. They work with clients in order to help them negotiate on their own and also represent them during their conflicts. Linking mediation and advocacy to human services requires all three parties to be fully engaged in helping individuals. An advocate and mediator are instructed to help individuals during a conflict; this links them to human services because they are required to use their thinking skills as well as people skills to help them during their disagreements. Human service professionals are determined to find the equality in other individuals by helping them realize what the other half is expecting from the other person as well as carrying out many roles. Human services professionals negotiate just like mediators and advocates with their clients the purpose, goals, and nature of a helping relationship, all professionals are entitled to protect the client's rights by providing confidentially and maintaining a decent privacy...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mediation: an Effective Resolution Proces

...still feel this way and practice accordingly. In the personal injury field one needs to be very aggressive in order to seek the best compensations and the best outcome for the client. It is my obligation to give the best advice to my client before seeking any other legal alternatives. As attorneys we must acknowledge that we represent a ‘person’ who is a victim of some sort of incident. Whether they are the victim or the accused we are hired because they need our legal help. Once the facts have been established and the case has been processed (disclosure/ evidence obtained), mediation can be the best course of action. The reasons mediation are favourable are: 1. Negative consequences from litigation; 2. Time and legal costs of litigation; and 3. Mediation is a predictable and less confrontational option. Mediation is a method of problem-solving that relies on consent of the parties. For this reason it is more attuned to self-determination than is a trial resulting in a solution imposed by a judge. As a lawyer it is my duty to give the soundest advice possible. Whether this requires a...

Words: 2574 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Assessment Manage Mediation Process

...Research the following TERMS and PHRASES these are linked with your assessment. Attach your definition or explanation to each point. Please remember to Reference. Question 1 In your own words explain the following: a) Mediation Action between parties, as to effect an agreement or reconciliation ✔ b) Triggers anything- an act or event that serves as stimulus and initiate a reaction or series or reactions. ✔ c) Parameters Guidelines, boundaries of the scenario on given policy ✔ d) Communication techniques Skills and implementations used to exchange or thoughts, opinion, information, and messages. ✔ e) Models and Systems for mediation consist of 4 main models : Facilitative mediation, Evaluative Mediation, Transformative mediation, and Narrative mediation ✔ f) Stakeholders All parties that are directly or indirectly related which all share an interest to a act or event ✔ g) Endorsement approval or sanction given by any party ✔ h) Participant A person or a group that take part in any given situation ✔ i) Resolution a resolve or the act of resolving or determining upon an action ✔ j) Mediator A third party; person or a group(s) as an intermediary, settling dispute or agreement between parties ✔ k) Negotiation Mutual discussion and arrangement or the term of a transaction or agreement ✔ l) Arbitration The hearing and determining of a dispute or the settling of differences parties...

Words: 1849 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Six Stages of Mediation Process

...Six Stages of The Mediation Process In mediation, two or more people come together to try to work out a solution to their problem. A neutral third person, called the mediator, is there to help them along. Most mediators have some training in conflict resolution, although the extent of their training varies greatly. Unlike a judge or an arbitrator, the mediator does not take sides or make decisions. The mediator's job is to help the disputants evaluate their goals and options and find their own mutually satisfactory solution. Mediation is forward-looking; the goal is for all parties to work out a solution they can live with and trust. It focuses on solving problems, not uncovering the truth or imposing legal rules. This, of course, is a far different approach than courts take. In court, a judge or jury looks back to determine who was right and who was wrong, then imposes a penalty or award based on its decision. Because the mediator has no authority to impose a decision, nothing will be decided unless both parties agree to it. Knowing that no result can be imposed from above greatly reduces the tension of all parties -- and it also reduces the likelihood that someone will cling to an extreme position. Also, if mediation does not produce an agreement, either side is free to sue. Typically, neighbor-to-neighbor or other personal issues are resolved in a few hours. Negotiations between divorcing couples or small businesses often involve several half-day sessions, spread...

Words: 625 - Pages: 3