Premium Essay

Mgmt591- Building a Coalition Case Study

In:

Submitted By abbymo11
Words 956
Pages 4
Building A Coalition
Group Development
According to Bruce Tuckman's model of group development, the stages include forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. A group starts in the forming position where the ground rules are established and the team members hardly know each other. As it moves to the storming stage, the members of the group are still individualized and resist any form of leadership. The storming stage is where it is likely for the group to get stuck. With the help of a good boss, the norming stage will come next in which the concept of teamwork is accepted. Once that is mastered, the performing stage comes into play in which the team continues to work in a good trusting atmosphere to complete their task. Finally, a reflection is made over the team's accomplishments and that is to be known as the adjourning stage. In the case study Building a Coalition, the members of the group are currently in the forming stage of their group development. This being because they have yet to identify exactly what three members are going to be included in the final team. Once their team members are set that will get the ball rolling to proceed to the next stage, storming. The Woodson Foundation could have benefited from understanding the stages of group development in that it could have acted as an effective resource that has proper guidelines in place to know what it takes to form a highly functioning team. From the information presented in the article, it is apparent that the Woodson Foundation is reluctant in working together with the other organizations in order to create a successful program. Seeing that each of the groups have their specific areas of strong concern, like the Woodson foundation's focus on hard data, NCPIE's focus on the parents, and the school's consistency with the school board and unionization with new jobs, the development

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Mis 535

...Case Study: Building a Coalition MGMT591 First of all, in order to successfully build a coalition for Woodson Foundation, we should be aware of the necessary stags of group development that we are going to go over: The first stage is Forming, which is bringing the new plan in development by creating an executive team with the assistance of Human Resources to select the correct candidates for the new occupations available. The second period is Storming, which brings conflict among the members of the group, principally because each representative of the groups has his or her particular interests. To go through this phase, they have to think as a team without all the doubtful behavior The third phase will be Norming. To succeed here, they should set their common goal up to begin the performance, feel more comfortable with the rest of the team, and work efficiently together. An important issue to take into account here is that there has to be someone who leads that work assuming the role of leader. The following stage is Performing. This stage will start when the team starts to perform together to achieve the objective set up by the association. Last but not least, the Adjourning stage starts when the team members feel a sense of loss and their enthusiasm decay because the team's task is approaching to the end. Because of this phase, it is imperative to distinguish the team members for their achievements and exult the team's overall accomplishment. In this case, since...

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Mgmt 591

...Case Study Week 3 Zhengyu Gui dragonfly8563@gmail.com MGMT591 Professor Bodero July 2014 Group Development When developing teams, a five-stage group-development model called the Tuckman Ladder is referenced most often. The model, first proposed by the educator Bruce Tuckman, is consisted of five distinct stages all teams go through: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each stage is characterized as the following: * Forming: Characterized by a great deal of uncertainty about the group’s purpose, structure, and leadership. Not until these issues are sorted out members can think of themselves as part of the team and move on to the next stage. * Storming: Characterized by intragroup conflict. Members accept the existence of the group but resist the constraints it imposes on individuality. There is conflict over who will control the group. When this stage is complete, there will be a relatively clear hierarchy of leadership within the group. * Norming: Characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness. There is now a strong sense of group identity and camaraderie. This stage is complete when the group structure solidifies and the group has assimilated a common set of expectations of what defines correct member behavior. * Performing: Characterized by fully functional group. The group structure at this point is fully functional and accepted. Group energy has moved from getting to know and understand each other to performing the...

Words: 1417 - Pages: 6