Throughout the sixties, government authorities were going through a period of unjustified action or giving the “third degree” to criminal suspects. Thus, brought the birth of legal aid movements, this was helpful for the suspects to receive legal aid. In other words, with this movement and many more after, police interrogations made people start to question officer’s behavior during interrogations. To illustrate, the famous Supreme Court of the United States landmark court case, Miranda V. Arizona, was one of the identifying starts of others questioning government authorities and citizen’s constitutional rights. In Miranda V. Arizona, on March 13, 1963 in Phoenix, Arizona, Ernesto Miranda was apprehended due to, kidnapping, rape, and robbery. …show more content…
The victim pointed out Ernesto Miranda, then the police officers interrogated Ernesto Miranda. After two harsh hours of interrogation, Ernesto Miranda confessed to his crime. Ernesto Miranda gives the police officers a written and signed confession, with his signature he agreed that he knew exactly what his actions meant, which meant that he confessed to his criminal actions and he was giving away his rights. Throughout this whole entire period of arrest to interrogation, Ernesto Miranda has not received his constitutional rights and he was unaware of his constitutional rights at all. As result, in 1966, when Ernesto Miranda’s trial started, his lawyer Alvin Moore, objected all claims or evidence dealing with Ernesto Miranda Confession. He argued that the confessions were not valid due to Ernesto Miranda not able to freely give a confession. For that reason, the Supreme Court of the United States reviewed his case, they decided that Ernesto Mirandas confession was nugatory due to the police officers failing to notify Ernesto Miranda of his constitutional