Free Essay

Monsanto Place and Price Analysis

In:

Submitted By pvest41
Words 1886
Pages 8
Monsanto Place and Price Analysis
Fundamentals of Marketing and Sales
BUS3030
Pamela Vest

PLACE

Distribution Channels
Monsanto, an agriculture company, creates, produces, and provides genetically modified seeds to farmers around the world. With the issues of agriculture, Monsanto is working to produce more, conserve more, and improving lives (Monsanto, 2014). As the world’s population grows and not enough of land suitable for agriculture, farmers must produce more. Farmer’s crops yield more, and are reducing water, nutrients, and energy by using the Monsanto seeds.
Monsanto creates genetically modified seeds in labs, by taking two good parents and breeds them to produce an offspring plant that is suitable for a certain agricultural area. With manufacturing plants, seed production facilities, and research centers scattered around the world, Monsanto distribution channels are focused around the geographic area near these facilities. Monsanto produces the seeds in their plants and must produce and distribute enough to meet the weekly high demands of farmers. With the precise timing the production and distribution plans due to the high demand, make for a more credible business approach. Monsanto manufacturing plants lack the storage spaces for the seeds, resulting in Monsanto having to use Public Storage facilities. Once at the public storage facilities, seeds are then delivered to distributor warehouse, and then they are delivered to retailers, whole sellers, trade partners, then to farmers. Bulk terminals do not deliver to warehouses, but straight to the retailers from the plants. Placement Strategy With the seasons, farmers are in demand for certain products and certain times. Monsanto not only has to consider the seasons, but must also consider the active ingredients. With products having to be made a least 6 months before the farmers growing season, Monsanto must remain ahead of the seasons and produce enough of seeds as to keep the profits benefiting the company. In the U.S., active ingredients and finish goods are usually produced simotaniasly. The headquarters develop forcasts and are used throughout the production and distrubition season. If the forcast fails to predict a market effect for that season, distribution sent to the wrong site, products will not be enough or worse yet, excess products could be produced. Seeing these could be affects, it is important that the forecast is developed, planned, and followed precisely.
Storage is limited at the production plants, so a loose process is used, which ships to all points to where the product might be sold. Such as, if corn is not grown in a certain area, Monsanto will not seed corn seeds to the agricultural area that is not used or suitable for growing corn. Monsanto must stay ahead of the season as to be sure they have enough seeds for the farmers the next growing season. With this come precise planning, production, and shipping to the needed areas. Planning and time is very important when it comes to the production of the seeds. Without it, farmers could be without the seeds that are needed for that season, or the wrong seeds being delivered.
Due to sterile seeds, and threats of lawsuits, farmers are stuck in a vicious circle of having to purchase the seeds year after year, as a way to keep their crops growing at a higher yield while using less during the growing season.Without these GM seeds, the crops would yield less while using more resources. With the nationally placed plants and retailers, farmers can easily obtain the seeds recommended for their geographic and agricultural needs. Farmers do not find any availability issues when it comes to Monsanto seeds.

PRICING
Pricing Strategy
Monsanto pricing is based on the value of the products compared to other seed products. To make farmers more profitable by using Monsanto seeds than a competitor’s product, the seeds are annually priced. The goal for Monsanto is to give farmers more for their dollar than the competitor products, provide farmers with the best seeds that yield a higher crop, and agronomic solutions.
Tangible and intangible benefits are considered with determining the value of the seeds. The factors of tangible involve the money farmers save on inputs that the seeds reduce the need for, such as chemicals, labor, equipment, fuel, water etc.) Along with the income from the yield increase. Intangible factors include financial risks, exposure to chemicals reduced, and convince. These benefits do differ between regions and the pricing is taken into consideration. Data from field testing conduced in cooperation from the farmers is collecting and used to quantify benefits. With this data, it is analyzed and used to price the products as a way to deliver more value to farmers than the products of the competitor’s.
Commodity prices fluctuate daily, so Monsanto uses the Chicago Board of Trade as a rolling average of prices for corn and soybean and with the cotton New York Exchange is used. Rolling average is used to look at a measurement of long term change such as the prices from this year to last year.
Farmers have a choice every season when it comes to seeds, herbicide systems, and trait technologies. With the realization of this, Monsanto prides itself with being transparent in the prices and the way they price. After all, for Monsanto to be successful the farmers must also be successful.
In 2011, Monsanto changed its pricing strategy in order to remain the key manufacturer and supplier. Monsanto conducted discussion with 1,200 growers and with the concern of weak sale of corn and soybean sales drove them to the decision to lower prices. With is strategy, Monsanto expected the profit to increase from 13 percent to 17 perfect (Kasky, 2010).
In 2014, Monsanto bought the Climate Corporation and is selling detailed weather and soil information to farmers. With this data, farmers are able to plan, rack, and harvest crops which make farmers more productive. Monsanto new product line, drought resistant corn and cotton are engineered to resist drought and still yield the same amount of corn during the harvest.
The pricing strategy is based on the advantage that Monsanto has over the first generation of products, natural seeds. Monsanto products are legally protected by US patents which gives the company justification for pricing their products slightly above the market price. Due to the patents, farmers are not allowed to save second generation seeds for replanting a second crop. With this stipulation on the seeds from the crops, farmers are forced to continue to buy new seeds each year for additional crops. With Monsanto, they are the largest seed supplier in the world; farmers are limited to the availability to purchase seeds.
“Our pricing has the flexibility built in to ensure the grower captures the greatest return from his seed investment, irrespective of market volatility,” Chief Executive Officer Hugh Grant (Monsanto, 2014). Monsanto Monopoly | 80% US corn | 93% US soybean | 1676 number of patents, seeds, and plant owned by Monsanto | 282 Million of acres worldwide grow Monsanto seeds | 151.4 million of acres grow Monsanto in the US | 95% of the US GE corn seed market contains the Monsanto traits | 89% of the US GE cotton seed market contains the Monsanto traits |

Pricing Comparison
Due to fewer choices, the prices for Monsanto seeds are priced higher depending on the geographic areas. Monsanto, DuPont, Syngeta, and Dow own 80% of the Corn US market and 70% of the soybean business along with controlling more than 50% of the world seed supply. With the purchase of smaller seed companies, Monsanto has dominated the seed industry. With this strategy, Monsanto gives farmers less to choose from and can charge a higher price for the products.
In 2010, soybean prices were $70 per bag, a percent of 143 increases from 2001. As of today, there is a 325 percent increase with soybean and corn seeds.
With Monsanto, geographic locations are taken into effect as to seeds being made available. Such as, in South Africa it is virtually impossible to obtain non-GE soy seeds, but Monsanto seeds are readily available. Over 85% of soybean and corn seeds are GE seeds, with over half having the Monsanto trait, figure 1 (Newman, 2010).

Figure [ 1 ]

Pricing Analysis
As Monsanto continues to purchase major and small seed companies, they are eliminating the choices that farmers have as to who to obtain seeds from. With the competition eliminated, Monsanto can price their seeds higher and the farmers are forced to purchase due to no other company to buy from. With the prices for seeds continue to climb, Monsanto continues to profit. However, some farmers do purchase the seeds due to the seeds producing higher yielding crops for the growing season. Monsanto is on a mission to feed the world and I believe that they will succeed.
Farmers are forced to continue to purchase seeds from Monsanto each growing season due to the patents that is in effect. With these patents, farmers are not able to save seeds for the next growing season. Farmers in violation of these patents are taken to court and sued for violation of infringement. Farmers are not able to fight the company due to limited financial funds, so they normally settle out of court.
Monsanto targets areas in the world that purchase their non-Monsanto seeds locally, such as El Salvador. The U.S. government has been pushing El Salvador to engage in a 5-year contract with Monsanto for the past two years. Salvadoran farmers are protesting a placed stipulation in a $277 million US aid package that requires the farmers to purchase Monsanto GM corn and bean seeds rather than allowing them to purchase their seeds locally (Clark, 2014). So, depending on the geographic locations and available seeds in that area depends on the price of the seeds. Controversy surrounds Monsanto with claims of taking advantage of the situation to gain power and profit.
With such actions as these, Monsanto is gaining control of the world’s food supply and dominating the seed industry. As they gain control, and eliminate competition farmers worldwide are forced to pay high prices for these seeds.
A decade ago the price for a 50-pound bag of soybean seeds were $11.00, today it is rose to $56.00. This is due to no choice or competition in the seed market.

References
Clark, M. (2014). The US Wants To Force GMO Seeds On Salvadoran Farmers, But They're Resisting: Report. Retrieved 2014, from http://www.ibtimes.com/us-wants-force-gmo-seeds-salvadoran-farmers-theyre-resisting-report-1623064
Graves, S., Gutierrez, C., Pulwer, M., Sidhu, H., & Weihs, G.Retrieved 2014, from http://web.mit.edu/sgraves/www/papers/monsanto.pdf
Kasky, J. (2010). Monsanto to Cut Soybean, Corn Seed Prices to Help Boost Profit About 15% - Bloomberg. Retrieved August 12, 2014, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-04-07/monsanto-will-lower-modified-seed-prices-to-help-boost-profit-by-about-15-.html
Monsanto. (2014). A Sustainable Agriculture Company. Retrieved August 11, 2014, from http://www.monsanto.com/pages/default.aspx
Newman, W. (2010). Rapid Rise in Seed Prices Draws U.S. Scrutiny - NYTimes.com. Retrieved 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/business/12seed.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Roseboro, K. (2013). The GMO Seed Monopoly: Fewer Choices, Higher Prices | Food Democracy Now. Retrieved 2014, from http://www.fooddemocracynow.org/blog/2013/oct/4/the_gmo_seed_monopoly_fewer_choices_higher_prices

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Monsanto Balances Environmental & Ethical Factors Case Study

...UNIT 2 COMPLETION QUESTIONS: Monsanto Balances Environmental & Ethical Factors   CASE SUMMARY: Summarize the key facts of the case in a paragraph. Monsanto Company is the world’s largest seed company specializing in biotechnology or genetic manipulations or organisms (Ferrell, Gatewood, Gatewood, & Taylor, 2010). Scientist of Monsanto spend numerous hours modifying crops, inserting new genes or adapting existing genes within plant seeds, to meet certain aims; for example, higher crop yields or insect resistance. Their seeds have increased quantity and availability of crops, and help all farmers worldwide increase food production and revenues. Monsanto was started in 1901 by John F. Queeny, selling food additives, food extracts, and artificial sweeteners to different companies. Times changed and in the seventies, Monsanto marketed its first roundup herbicide that would propel the company even more into the public’s consciousness. However, it did do that, but within a few years after the introduction of Agent Orange which contained carcinogenic chemical dioxin, Monsanto had legal problems and a lawsuit was filed in 1979 by veterans who claimed they had been harmed by the chemical. Monsanto and other manufacturers agreed to settle for $180 million. The leaders of Monsanto decided a new focus was needed and in 1981 the company made a change focusing on biotechnology. With this new quest, the company began selling soybeans, cotton, and canola seeds if they...

Words: 2454 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Ethic Issues

...Part I Intra- and Extra Organizational Ethical Issues In prior to clarify the relationship between intra- and extra-organizational intangibles in individual cases, how these intangibles within business organizations could interact with those organizations’ various external constituents or stakeholders should be stressed in the very beginning. As the cornerstone of the corporate strategy, risk management plays a crucial role in promoting business ethics and social responsibility. Since any failure to appear in business integrity could result in a ruin of reputation, both of employers and employees should commit themselves to maximize returns to their shareholders. Therefore, how to evaluate and control the risk within corporations has become the center of business development. Strengthening customer loyalty and investors’ confidence could differentiate companies from their competitors mainly by improving intra-organizational ethics. On the contrary, ignoring business ethics from the companies could encourage their major competitors to use that against them, thus resulting in an enormous loss of share in the market. In addition, taking the initiative in business ethics could allow corporations to avoid interruption of taxation and regulation. Conversely, the dishonest business acting is possible to force the company into litigation or penalization by the law agencies of local governments. However, merely concentrating on the intra-organizational ethics could underestimate the...

Words: 2688 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Impact of Genetic Modification of Food on Global Food Marketing

...on global food marketing Since genetically modified (GM) food has entered the global food market in early mid 1990s and corn, rice, canola oil and soybeans become among the first FDA-approved Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), large companies such as Monsanto, Nestle and PepsiCo experienced cost benefits with these new ingredients and the trend has quickly spread to other sects of the food industry. Genetically modified food can be defined as organisms in which genetic material has been altered by recombinant DNA technology. It sparks controversy among agricultural sectors. Some may advocate that such biotechnology generates a set of potential benefits to producers or consumers with cheaper production costs and food attribute enhancements while others may dispute the possible costs of unintended allergic responses, long-term health and environmental effects, ethical or moral issues. Consumers’ perceptions of these potential benefits and costs shape market responses to the new technologies and eventually determine how widely the technology is adopted. This essay will discuss the issues around genetic modification of food and the impact of them on how food is marketed globally. Table 1 below shows the PESTLE analysis to examine the external environment for GM food. Politically, GMOs regulations differ in countries, with marked differences between US and EU. Many GM plants including varieties of soya bean, cotton, maize and rice not authorised for use in the EU, have been...

Words: 2234 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Monsanto Report a Corporate Profile

...Francisco, CA 94107 tel: (415) 293-9900 fax: (415) 293-8394 info-ca@fwwatch.org www.foodandwaterwatch.org Copyright © 2013 by Food & Water Watch. All rights reserved. This report can be viewed or downloaded at www.foodandwaterwatch.org. A CORPORATE PROFILE Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Company History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Modern-Day Monsanto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Monsanto’s Environmental Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Market Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 1. TIMELINE: A Selected History of Monsanto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Influence on Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 2. Monsanto’s Interlocking Board Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 3. Monsanto’s Revolving...

Words: 7321 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Film Analysis: the Corporation

...Film Analysis: The Corporation University/Institution Name: Student’s Name: Professor’s Name: Course Name: Date Submitted: Film Analysis: The Corporation Introduction The Corporation, an infotainment by moviemakers Jennifer Abbott and Mark Achbar and authored by Joel Bakan, explores the legal standard, basically inquiring: if corporations were people, what manner of people would they be? Making use of psychiatrical main beliefs and FBI forensic technics, and through several case studies, the motion picture ascertains that this “being”, the corporation, which has an ever-increasing power over the daily existence of almost all living creatures on earth, would be a sociopath. The case studies consist of a story concerning how two reporters were sacked from Fox News for declining to downplay a story about the risks of a product of Monsanto given to dairy cattle, and another regarding Bolivian employees who confederated to guard their rights on their own water provision. The commonness of corporate control over our lives is looked into by analyzing efforts to manipulate behavior, together with that of children. The key argument of the infotainment is that, as the corporate legal “body” under current law is regarded to be a person, founded on its characteristics and personality, is a sociopath. Bakan establishes this standpoint on several things but letting the Psychologist tackle the question while the expert deals with psychosis. The major problems of a corporation discussed...

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gmo's

...need for basic food items is increased. Technology is involved in every facet of our lives. It is used continuously every day whether it be waking up to an alarm clock, watching TV that you recorded on a digital video recorder, brushing your teeth with a mechanical toothbrush, or using your GPS navigation system when going to your latest vacation destination. The latest technology has made it possible for people to communicate with others all over the world in both audio and video formats. Scientists are continuously looking for ways to make living easier and more productive. They are looking for solutions to world hunger, new medical advances to cure cancer and other diseases plaguing the world, and ways to make our society a healthier place to live. In this research paper, we will be discussing Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) and their contributions to these causes. We will be examining the history, political, moral, ethical, and many other ways that GMOs have influenced everyday living. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)...

Words: 12380 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Nestle

...Case Analysis Nestlé Group 3 11 February 2010 David Chol, Whitney Drost, Raynard Geason, Sarah Laborde, Casey Landers, Darren McNeely, Vanessa Robicheaux, Nicholas Knight, Taylor Mendel, Jonathan Bush, John Priola, William Ratcliff Table of Contents Introduction3 Goals3 Constraints3 Introduction Through the years, Nestlé has emerged as a multi-national company that serves as a brand in itself as well as an umbrella company for many well-recognized processed food commodity brands. Nestlé was established in 1867, with the distribution of its first product, dehydrated baby food; this product quickly made the company profitable. Through a series of well-coordinated mergers and the growth of a vast selection of innovative food products, Nestlé became the global giant it is today. Nestlé’s success can be attributed to its deep agricultural supply chain, strong local market teams, hiring from within, and long tenured CEOs. Nestlé has become the epitome of innovation and success in the retail food product industry. In 1996 Nestlé established the Nestlé Environmental Management System (NEMS) in an attempt to produce more environmentally friendly products. NEMS required innovative eco-design in the company’s products and activities, and gave preference to suppliers who worked to improve their levels of efficiency and sustainability regarding their use of resources. Aside from this, NEMS also requires independent environmental auditing regarding the practices...

Words: 3316 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Burt's Bees: Leaving the Hives

...Josephine Campeau Sustainability in the Business Environment | Ronald Whitfield Josephine Campeau Sustainability in the Business Environment | Ronald Whitfield Burt’s Bees: leaving the Hives Burt’s Bees: leaving the Hives It is fascinating to see how quickly trends are launched, accepted and then spurned. The world of consumer products can be compared to a roller-coaster; always full of surprises. Yet, health and sustainability have seemed to gain shopper’s consideration. Fortunately, Burt’s Bees has managed to seize market opportunities and offer products that have satisfied consumers desires for more than 30 years. Still, the company has evolved and is very different than when it first begun. This analysis will consider the evolution of the brand, the current business model and the risks and opportunities accompanying those transformations. The acquisition of Burt’s Bees by Clorox has raised concerns. People feared of having to let go “their brand” other thought that Burt’s Bees would have to forgo all its special characteristics by merging with Clorox. Certainly, the purchase brought changes but also optimism. With an altered distribution process and an economy of scale greater number of people can now have access to the brand. Furthermore, the marketing team understood that it had to convey a convincing message to its clientele; the ecofriendly and natural benefits of the product line would remain. The fidelity that people had toward the brand was in jeopardy...

Words: 1721 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Scientific Paper

...Science Daily Using Less Water to Grow More Potatoes ScienceDaily (Sep. 1, 2011) — Research conducted in part at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has confirmed that in some production systems, planting potatoes in flat beds can increase irrigation water use efficiency. Agricultural Research Service (ARS) agricultural engineer Bradley King, who works at the ARS Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory in Kimberly, Idaho, was one of the scientists who led these studies. ARS is USDA's chief intramural scientific research agency, and this research supports the USDA commitment to enhancing sustainable agriculture. When potato production started in Idaho more than 100 years ago, farmers seeded their crops in ridged rows and watered their plants by channeling surface irrigation to flow through the furrows between the rows. Even though most commercial potato producers in the Pacific Northwest now irrigate their crops with sprinklers, they still typically use ridged-row planting systems. But this planting configuration allows irrigation runoff to collect in the furrow and percolate below the crop root zone. This means that the water is unavailable to the crops, and can also lead to increased nitrate leaching from the soil. King and his partners conducted a series of studies on planting potatoes in flat beds instead of ridged rows. One two-year study compared ridge-row planting systems, a 5-row planting configuration on a raised bed where the plant rows were 26...

Words: 3777 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Ipr and Competition

...Contents List of abbreviations 2 Index of Authorities 3 List of Statutes 3 List of Cases 3 Aim of the study 4 Review of literature 4 Research Methodology: 4 Hypothesis: 4 INTRODUCTION 5 Intellectual Property Rights and policy 6 Competition Law and Policy 7 CONFLICT BETWEEN IPR AND COMPETITION LAW 9 INDIAN SCENARIO 14 Analysis of Judgments 16 CONCLUSION 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY 21 List of abbreviations AIR - All India Reporter CCI – Competition Commission of India US – United States of America Del – Delhi Bom - Bombay SC – Supreme Court IPR – Intellectual Property Rights GI – Geographical Indication Index of Authorities List of Statutes * The Competition Act; 2002. * The Copyright Act, 1957. * The Patents Act, 1970. * The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 or the Trade Marks Act, 1999. * The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. * The Designs Act, 2000. * The Semi-conductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000. List of Cases * FICCI Multiplex Association of India v United Producers/Distributers Forum (case No 1 of 2009, CCI) * Reliance Big entertainment Ltd v Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, Case No 25 2010. * Microfibres Inc v Giridhar, 128 (2006) DLT 238. * Amir Khan Production Pvt Ltd v Union of India, 2010(112) Bom L R 3778 * Kingfisher v CCI writ petition no 1785 of 2009. * Manju Bharadwaj v ZEE Telefilms Ltd (1996) 20 CLA 229. ...

Words: 6824 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Gmos: Truth vs. Myth

...GMO MYTHS AND TRUTHS An evidence-based examination of the claims made for the safety and efficacy of genetically modified crops Michael Antoniou Claire Robinson John Fagan June 2012 GMO Myths and Truths An evidence-based examination of the claims made for the safety and efficacy of genetically modified crops Version 1.3 by Michael Antoniou Claire Robinson John Fagan © Earth Open Source www.earthopensource.org 2nd Floor 145–157, St John Street, London EC1V 4PY, United Kingdom Contact email: claire.robinson@earthopensource.org June 2012 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this paper, or otherwise published by EOS, are those of the authors and do not represent the official policy, position, or views of other organizations, universities, companies, or corporations that the authors may be affiliated with. GMO Myths and Truths 2 About the authors Michael Antoniou, PhD is reader in molecular genetics and head, Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s Cols: lege London School of Medicine, London, UK. He has 28 years’ experience in the use of genetic engineering technology investigating gene organisation and control, with over 40 peer reviewed publications of original work, and holds inventor status on a number of gene expression biotechnology patents. Dr Antoniou has a large network of collaborators in industry and academia who are making use of his discoveries in gene control mechanisms for the production of research, diagnostic and therapeutic products...

Words: 78055 - Pages: 313

Premium Essay

Article

...strategies. Several companies have successfully adopted such strategies. These include pharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi-Aventis, information technology companies such as SAP and Vendavo, wireless internet service providers such as the Australian company Xone, airlines such as Lufthansa, vehicle manufacturers such as BMW, and biotech companies such as Tigris Pharmaceuticals. The increasing endorsement of customer value-based strategies among academics and practitioners is based on a general recognition that the keys to sustained profitability lie in the essential features of customer value-based pricing, including understanding the sources of value for customers; designing products, services, and solutions that meet customers’ needs; setting prices as a function of...

Words: 4946 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Positioning the Battle for Your Mind

...redirecting... | |cover |next page > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ...

Words: 30800 - Pages: 124

Premium Essay

Bus560 Final Exam Solution

...C. The company is determined to satisfy customer needs D. The company wants to use a customer focused strategy 2. The process of planning and executing conceptions, pricing, promotion and distribution of ideas, goods and services to create exchange that satisfy individual and organizational goals is the definition of A. Marketing B. Management C. Strategic planning D. Accounting 3. Identify the marketing type which is designed to attract donors, members, participants or volunteers? A. Product B. Organization C. Place D. Cause 4. In large organizations, the marketing plans of individual departments are guided by A. Plans rolled out by the production unit B. Sales strategies of the marketing department C. Planning activities of the organizational units D. Strategic plans or blueprints for the entire organization 5. Which type of marketing would involve strategies to elect a political candidate? A. Product B. Service C. Person D. Place 6. The organization's mission, objectives, strategies and its...

Words: 10819 - Pages: 44

Premium Essay

Corpwatch

...Corporate Sustainability and NGO-Activism: The Case of Corporate Watch Description and analysis of the mission, concept and impact of Corpwatch Corpwatch is an independent non-profit organization dealing with environmental, social and other topics. Therefore investigative research and journalism is practiced to inform public about environmental issues and to increase transparency. The organization was founded in 1996 in the San Francisco Bay Area. The project was started by the Tides Center and is led by a six-member Executive Committee of the Advisory Board. The foundation from which the organization emerged and evolved was the book, The Corporate Planet: Ecology and Politics in the Age of Globalization, written by 's founder Joshua Karliner, and published by Sierra Club Books in 1997. Another strong affiliated organization are the Friends of the Earth International. CorpWatch puts itself as a part of a diverse global movement for human rights, social justice, environmental sustainability, peace, corporate transparency and accountability. The Mission The vision of Corpwatch is to promote human, environmental, social and worker rights at the local, national and global levels by making corporate practices more transparent and holding corporations accountable for their actions. Actions, decisions, and policies undertaken and pursued by private corporations are seen with a huge impact on public life without public control, but only few mechanisms to hold them...

Words: 1841 - Pages: 8