Premium Essay

Morality vs. Ethics

In:

Submitted By jlewis487
Words 1346
Pages 6
Module One Essay
Murder is wrong. One should always tell the truth. It is not right to steal. Most people would agree with the aforementioned phrases. However, what are they classified as? Do these expressions deal with morality, ethics, or both? Although these terms are often confused, morality and ethics are very distinct. On the surface this terminology may seem analogous, but their definitions are quite dissimilar. Morality and ethics are major components when examining the decision making of corporations. Despite having different meanings, morality and ethics are interrelated words that play a major part in business organizations.
Morality
The term morality deals with an individual or groups interpretation of what is right and wrong. In fact, it can be defined as the standards that a group or individual has about what is good and evil or right and wrong (Velasquez, 2006). Morals for the most part, are fairly unwavering within a group. The vast majority of people would agree that it is wrong or immoral to murder, steal, lie, or cheat. These are examples of moral standards. Moral standards are described as the types of behaviors or actions believed to be morally good or bad (Velasquez, 2006). There is also what is known as nonmoral standards. These principles judge what is good or bad in a nonmoral way such as good grammar or proper etiquette (Velasquez, 2006). In addition to understanding the meaning of morality, it is important to understand where these standards come from.
Morality comes from many different influences in a person’s life. These standards are usually absorbed as a child from family, friends, church, school, and other various social influences (Velasquez, 2006). As an individual matures, their beliefs are further expanded. Life experiences, learning, and intellectual advancement allow people to develop principles better

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Morals and Ethics

...Morals and Ethics in Society Kalob Lisk Rasmussen College Author Note This paper is being submitted on July 14, 2016, for Thomas Santangelo’s B406 Business Law and Ethical Behavior course. Morals and Ethics in Society Morals and ethics in society play major roles in our lives and our work environments and I am more than happy to write this research paper to help explain the similarities and its key differences. And this research paper will also include where both morals and ethics derived from and what can cause both of these. How can ethics or morals affect the work atmosphere and even outside of work. And with ethics and morals the key difference is that ethics comes from the social system and can be an external factor, while morals can be derived from the individual and is an internal factor. Ethics can be linked back to the Greek word “ethos” (Diffen, 2016) meaning “character”. And according to Merriam-Webster the full definition of ethos “The distinguishing character, sentiment, moral nature, or guiding beliefs of a person, group or institution”. (Merriam-Webster, 2016) Ethical behavior can be motivated by self-interest, or some intuitive sense of right and wrong and this can stem from our social system which I briefly describe in the first paragraph is an external factor. And consequently there is no clear-cut blueprint of ethics that you can use to project your business’ reputation and well-being of your employees and customers (Small Business, 2016)...

Words: 1023 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

We Did It Wow

...Ethics week 2 Team E Week 3 Issue: Team presentation Should tolerance of homosexuality be taught in our schools without parent consent? Does this violate the fundament social responsibility of parents? Week 5 issue: Why should illegal immigrants be entitled to free education, heath care services, food stamps and an assortment of other social service benefits? Does it make sense to reward those who break the law? Individual assignment 1. 5 primary barriers and obstacles that cause us to breach our moral & ethical values 2. How do they cause you to breach your moral and ethical values - Things that cause us to do the wrong things (temptations) ex: how does self interest cause us to do the wrong things 3. What needs be done to over come those obstacles 4. Do this for each of the primary barriers Week 3 presentation: 10 points 1. Provide background on issue- extent of it taught in schools MARCELA Ex: polls, legislature, historical value 2. ID and discuss all arguments on either side of the question (broad implications of this issue) Do schools have the rights where do their rights begin and end JAMES What are the rights of the parents where do their rights begin and end JOE 3. Team conclusion- 4. Justify conclusion, why was one side more compelling than the other MIKE 20 min presentation * Construction (4 out of 10 points) * accuracy * COPY OF PPP 3 slides to each page NOTES Metaethics: understanding where do our...

Words: 1126 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Comparing Ethics and Morality

...Comparing Ethics and Morality M. Williams ETH/316 December 5, 2013 Leroy T. Smith III, PhDc In order to determine the differences, you would have to know the meanings of each. Virtue would emphasize one’s character which embodies determining or evaluating ethical behavior; living with high moral standards. Virtue-based ethical theories place less emphasis on which rules people should follow and instead focus on helping people develop good character traits, such as kindness and generosity. These character traits will, in turn, allow a person to make the correct decisions later on in life. (Cline, 2013) Utilitarianism is the morally correct course of action that affects the greater good, without a regard to benefits or burdens. According to utilitarianism, morality is a matter of the non-moral good produced that results from moral actions, rules, and moral duty are instrumental, not intrinsic. One main problem is that utilitarianism if adopted, justifies as morally appropriate things that are clearly immoral. (Moreland, 2009) Deontology determines the morality of an action based on a set of rules or a “binding duty”. Deontological ethics is in keeping with Scripture, natural moral law, and intuitions from common sense. For example, acts of lying, promise breaking, or murder are intrinsically wrong, and we have a duty not to do these things. (Moreland, 2009) A personal example of these values is when I was walking out of Kroger, my son and I observed an older woman struggling...

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Eth/316 Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Rukiya Parsons Ethics and Social Responsibility / 316 09/03/2015 Larhonda Jones Ethics Essay Ethics is defined as the study of moral philosophy that involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct as it pertains to habit or custom. The ethical theory focuses on the actions or character of an individual in relation to an ethical situation or issue. When I think of ethics I automatically am drawn to the conclusion of something being considered right or wrong based on cultural rules, while on the other hand when judging the morality of a situation I will almost always base my decision on personal values of what I consider to be just. This paper will compare the similarities and differences of ethical theories as it relates to ethics and morality. Consequential Theories “Consequential theories base morality on the results or outcomes of behaviors. Actions with good consequences are morally right; actions with bad consequences are morally wrong.” (Nicholas Manias, 2013, Ethics Applied, p.113) Utilitarianism An ethical theory that is almost self-explanatory, concluding that the best moral action results in optimal use or “utility” in an individual producing more good in a situation than bad for great numbers. As stated in the reading, happiness vs. unhappiness and the outcome of happiness proves to be morally ethical. Non-consequential Theories “Non-consequential theories base morality on factors other than...

Words: 405 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Friedrich Nietzsche

...“transvaluation of values”. By emphasizes this idea, Nietzsche tried to make people look beyond the traditional values and undergo the transformation that was vital in obtaining new and true values. Nietzsche also understood that there were two types of morality that existed in society. The two types of morality that Nietzsche emphasized are called master-morality and slave-morality. Master-morality is when the master is the judge and creator of all values. This is what determines the values and dominates strength. On page 214 in Great Traditions in Ethics by Theodore C. Denise, Nicholas P. White, and Sheldon P. Peterfreund Nietzsche states, “He honors whatever he recognizes in himself: such morality is self-glorification. There is a feeling of plentitude, of power, which seeks to overflow, the happiness of high tension, the consciousness of a wealth which would fain give and bestow.” In other words, Master-morality conveys strength, ability, power and aggressiveness. Those with master morality are strong and have created their own morality and they know that they are their own judges. Nietzsche does not say that it only conveys these four characteristics because there is also a place for compassion. He is also trying to explain that master-morality dominates the characters of humans. The...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mgt216 Wk 1 Ethical and Moral Issues

...ethical and moral issues in the business world. We will examine differences between personal ethics and business ethics. The preceding matters are all relevant to one another. The author will also provide some examples of common ethical problems that are faced in the business world. In order to distinguish the major differences between ethical and moral issues, we have to understand the differences. The following quote comes from an article named “Ethics and Morality in Business” by Thomas R. Schori, Ph.D., and Michael L. Garee:  Most of us instinctively believe, by virtue of our religious beliefs, our moral upbringing, or even our own internal moral "compass," that ultimately evil will be punished, either in the here and now or certainly in the great beyond.” Schori and Garee describe the battle between humanity and morality in that statement. The idea that people have the ability to understand right and wrong is expressed in that statement. Personal character will differ from person to person. However, there is still the balance between right and wrong that we all identify in our own ways. Society also plays a role in the topic of morality and ethics. Our personal beliefs are related to our own morals. The way society, business, and other types of institutions view issues come in to play with ethics. In order to examine the difference between business ethics and personal ethics, one must understand each category. It is possible for someone to make different decisions...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Similarties & Differences in Virtue

...Similarities and Differences in Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics This document will discuss the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. A persons ethical and social responsibility is very important to their personal and business success. Unfortunately, it is difficult to identify and classify what is ethical and moral. I will also provide a personal example of one of the ethical behavior. The first question you must ask yourself is what are the meaning of Virtue Theory, utilitarianism, and Deontological. According to the Webster Dictionary; Virtue- normally good behavior or character, a good moral quality, or the good result that comes from somerthing. Now what does that mean in laymens term, After reviewing the technical and professional expernatiation When talking about ethics it is hard to distinguish between ethics and morality. It is also hard to distinguish exactly what realm of ethics contributes to my everyday decisions. Ethics can be defined as “well-founded standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues [and] ethics refers to the study and development of one's ethical standards” (Andre, Shanks, & Velasquez, 2010, para. 8-9). According to Psychology Today (2013) morality is, “ethics, evil, greed, sin, and conscience” (para. 1). “Morals can vary from person to person...

Words: 1138 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Distinguish Between Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist Forms of Ethics and How They Relate to Business

...in a business context. Andrew Brady 10358293 Ethics can be defined as distinguishing and choosing between right and wrong (Oxford English Dictionary) and is a central part of what makes us human. It is, however, not as simple as it would first appear. The idea of ethics has long been the topic of discussion for philosophers and there are many differing views on the issue ranging from utilitarianism to virtue ethics. Despite this multitude of views certain grounds are agreed upon with regards to ethics: * The possibility of free will. * The focus on an individual’s relationship with others. * Some form of individual responsibility. (O’Regan, A; 2012) Morality and ethics are the fabrics with which our society is sewn. Society, its laws, social order and ethics are all interlinked. One of the main goals of society is to create harmony among its people and as such morality plays a huge role (Anon; 2007). Without these moral principles humans would act on mere base instinct with little regard for consequence, be they positive or negative. With this in mind it can be said that ethics and morality arise when we are no longer bound by the rules and laws of our society and as such must look within ourselves to decide what is right or wrong (Anon; 2007). As I have already said ethics is seen as an entirely human concept and is often seen as a social construct. I would be inclined to agree with this sentiment as ethics tend to change from culture to culture. That which...

Words: 3104 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Ethics

...Ethics Essay Jessica Washington ETH/316 February 1, 2014 Randy Howell Ethics Essay There are two major theories that try to break down and justify moral rules and principles of life. Virtue ethics looks closer at the role ones character plays, what virtues that person has to determine their ethical behavior. Deontological ethics is the natural moral law one lives by, intuitions from common sense. The word “deontological” comes from the Greek word Deon which means “binding duty.” (Moreland, 2009) Deontological ethics focuses more on doing the right thing, yes we know that lying or cheating is wrong however the consequences are not important. Consequences are what allow and help us realize what is morally wrong. When it comes to Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). (Moreland, 2009) A utilitarian believes that there is no rule or moral act that can be looked at as right or wrong morality is a means to a greater end. The difference between these ethical approaches of morality can be found in the way moral dilemmas are seen, not in the moral conclusion reached in the end. The word "virtue" is one such word that some individuals may interpret to imply a type of strength or power, while another individual may interpret the word to imply a type of righteousness and purity. (Ethics, 2013) Moral and ethical statements should also...

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Virtue Ethics

...The virtue ethics theory is presently one of three most well known points of views in normative ethics. Virtue in itself is moral excellence and righteousness and goodness. It can simply be defined as the theory that establishes the virtues, or moral character. Deontology in contrast to the virtue theory is a theory that governs duties and rules and emphasizes that for every action there is a consequence. Deontological ethics is in staying with Scripture, natural moral law, and intuitions from common sense.In the same sense, the utilitarian theory also focuses on consequences, but in a different light. The utilitarian theory states that people should try to maximize overall well-being. There are many different utilitarian theories, but they all have one thing in common. Each theory basically says that no moral rule or act is intrinsically right it wrong. Morality is a matter of the non-moral good produced that results from moral actions and rules, and moral duty is instrumental, not intrinsic. (Moreland J.P. 2009) Values are the regard that something is held to deserve or the importance or preciousness of something. Values, virtue and morality all go together. People have different beliefs, morals, and values because different people have different perspective on what are right and wrong. One theory I think can relate to a lot of things that have happened in my life is the utilitarian theory. I think I always try to maximize the most good that I possibly can. The world will...

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Phi 445

...Week One Journal Objective You will outline and explain ethical theories and then apply that knowledge to how organizations would function were they to adopt those ethical principles. In addition, you will also examine punishments for corporations and present your own ideas about the relationship between ethical demands on business entities vs. those on individuals in society. Instructions In this assignment you will reflect on the topics of Week One and apply them to an analysis of ethical paradigms. You will be asked to respond to two prompts below. The first asks you to explain three of the ethical philosophies you encountered in Chapter 1 of Introduction to Business Ethics, and then determine how companies that abide by these policies would act. In the second prompt, you will be asked to explain various punishments that can be given to corporations and the behaviors that are ethically dangerous to corporations. Please answer all questions in detail. Because this journal is worth 5% of your final grade, there is a high expectation for your participation. Grades for the journals are based on content, critical engagement, quality of reflection, and detail. Please submit the completed journal via the Assignment Basket found in the Week One Journal tab on the left navigation toolbar by Day 7. Organizations Select a Not-For Profit and a For Profit organization you would like to study. These will be the organizations that you will be focusing on throughout...

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Individual Research Paper

...Running head: ACCOUNTING ETHICS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEONTOLOGY AND UTILITARIANISM Accounting Ethics: Differences between Deontology and Utilitarianism Yaa Mendez Liberty University Outline: Introduction with thesis Deontology: definition, concepts Utilitarianism: definition, concepts Similarities between deontology and utilitarianism Difference between deontology and utilitarianism Conclusion In 2013, the movie, The Wolf of Wall Street portrayed the dishonest dealings of people involved in securities exchange and trades of foreign and public companies. The actor, Leonardo DiCaprio, had an sensational thirst for wealth and learned of greed from his superior. This movie portrays the idea that greed, an unethical behavior, is an acceptable behavior that business individuals must cultivate to increase their wealth. So what is ethics? According to Spiceland, Sepe, and Tomassini (2007), ethics is “a code or moral system that provides a criteria for evaluating what is right and wrong” (Spiceland, Sepe, and Tomassni, 2007). Deontological theories base morality on certain duties or obligations and claim that certain actions are right or wrong regardless of the consequences that may follow from the actions. Deontology is a moral theory that depends on scriptures that are governed by rules, moral laws, and intuition. The word deontology is derived from the Greek term “deon” and “logos” which means the “study of duty” (Moreland, 2009). Moreland (2009)...

Words: 1805 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Ethics

...Ethics Many people have different assumptions of what ethics is or what ethics is about. The dictionary says that ethics are a system of a moral principle and morals is what we consider to be principles of wrong or right conduct. Ethically some people believe this requires he or she to have a reason and justification for what he or she believes (Weber, 2008). This paper will compare the similarities and differences between virtue, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics theory’s with a description of differences in how each address ethics and morality. With a personal experience that will explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral beliefs as they relate to one of the three theories. Virtue Theory Similarities between virtue, utilitarianism, and deontological theory’s are they all recognize and support justice and responsibility towards ethics and a standard of action. Virtue focuses on what he or she should choose as their own personal innermost behavior or character and not solely on what customs or laws of a person’s culture are. When his or her character is good, then his or her choices or actions are good ("Virtue Ethics", 2009-2011). Utilitarianism This is an ethical structure that is steered toward outcomes and the results of actions. Making decisions and taking some sort of action that would benefit others by doing something good to the best of one’s ability and preventing anything bad from happening. Goals, results,...

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics

...A Summary of the Terms and Types of Ethical Theories Ethics is a branch of philosophy addressing questions about morality. Ethics is divided into two different ways of looking at the morality of humanity. They are Consequential and Non-Consequential. CONSEQUENTIAL ETHICS In Consequential Ethics, the outcomes determine the morality of the act. What make the act wrong are the consequences. It says, it will be legitimate to lie in order to get out of a serious problem, such as to save a persons life. In other words a white lie is fine. So the essence of morality is determined by the result or outcome of the act. NON – CONSEQUENTIAL ETHICS In non-Consequential Ethics, the source of morality comes from something else: law, God’s law, moral law, sense of duty, and your definition of what is the virtuous thing to do. All those considerations are built into the act itself before you could think of consequences, before it makes it right or wrong. One classic example is this system is lying. Lying could be wrong because in one system, it’s a violation of the nature of speech. It’s wrong to use a lie to achieve a good end. Simply put, a lie is a lie, is a lie. Egoism – Utilitarianism – Pragmatism Egoism - Means, act in your own self-interest. Utilitarianism - Do that which is moral only if the act produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. There are two brands of Utilitarianism: 1. Act Utilitarianism- Do the act. No consideration of before or after...

Words: 2474 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Chart

...Axia College Material Appendix B Ethical Theories Chart Complete the chart below using information from the weekly readings and additional research if necessary. Include APA formatted in-text citations when applicable and list all references at the bottom of the page. Ethical Theory | | | | | Utilitarianism | Deontological | Virtue ethics | | Definition | “Moral decisions require taking full advantage of the benefits as well as minimizing the damage to society. (Trevino & Nelson, 2007)”Or moral worth can determine only by the result outcome. One can only weight the morality of an action after knowing the consequences. | “Somebody who concentrates on carrying out what is “right” consistent with their own ethics as it’s as ideals. (Trevino & Nelson, 2007)” “So this approach judges the morality of someone action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules, according to which the rightness of an action is determined by its consequences.” | This focuses more on the integrity of the moral actor than on the moral act itself.”“A concentration on virtue ethics, or honesty, deal mainly with an individual’s character, inspirations, as their objectives, in place of results or regulations, as their crucial factor of moral philosophy.” (Trevino & Nelson, 2007) | Ethical thinker associated with theory | Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart | Immanuel Kant | Plato and Aristotle | Decision-making process | “What action nets the best...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2